J Occup Health 2018; 60: 111-125
Review
The prevalence of occupational health-related problems in
dentistry: A review of the literature
Rajeshree Moodley1, Saloshni Naidoo2 and Jacqueline van Wyk3
1
Discipline of Dentistry, School of Health Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa,
Discipline of Public Health Medicine, School of Nursing and Public Health, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban,
KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa and 3 Discipline of Clinical and Professional Practice, School of Clinical Medicine, College
of Health Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa
2
Abstract : The study was conducted to report on the
scope and prevalence of occupational health relatedproblems experienced by dentists, dental therapists, and
oral hygienists in their practice of dentistry. Background: Professional practice and dental training have
many risk factors, and the dental team should be able to
recognize these factors to protect themselves. The
prevalence of conditions related to the musculoskeletal
system, stress, percutaneous injuries, ears, and eyes
are of concern. The dental team should also not forget
hepatitis B, hepatitis C, and HIV as risks in practice. Dental practitioners should protect themselves by selfrecognizing risk factors and by maintaining proper working conditions. Methods: The study targeted all empirical research, case studies, and systematic literature reviews written in English. All articles selected were subjected to a data analysis process. Data were captured on
an Excel spreadsheet and reported in a comprehensive
table. Results : The literature addressing occupational
health among dental practitioners included mainly crosssectional studies and review papers (2001-2016). Fortynine studies were included in the review. Musculoskeletal disorders remain the most researched occupational
health-related problems in dentistry. Eye protection compliance was low among practitioners. Percutaneous injuries especially among young dentists and students were
still a concern. Conclusion: Occupational health-related
problems are still prevalent in current dentistry practice,
despite changes in equipment and surgery design. The
reported prevalence of occupational related-health problems and other findings of investigative studies highlight
Received July 19, 2017; Accepted November 13, 2017
Published online in J-STAGE December 6, 2017
Correspondence to: R. Moodley, Discipline of Dentistry, School of Health
Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, University Rd Reservoir Hills
4000, Durban, South Africa (e-mail: moodleyra@ukzn.ac.za)
the need for continuous professional education and a
need to improve clinical practice aspects of dentistry curricula.
(J Occup Health 2018; 60: 111-125)
doi: 10.1539/joh.17-0188-RA
Key words : Musculoskeletal disorders, Occupational
health, Percutaneous injury, Stress
Introduction
Dental practitioners in dentistry training and practice
environments are challenged with a number of occupational health barriers. The dental worker is prone to
physical and psychological stressors which are aggravated
by the work environment 1) . Irrespective of where one
works, the goal is to be in a safe environment without
having fear of incurring work-based injuries. It is important to have a “philosophy of prevention” which should
be followed to reach health and safety goals 2) . Occupational health is a multidisciplinary and comprehensive approach which aims to protect and promote the health of a
worker. The enhancement of physical, mental, and social
well-being will ensure that workers live productive lives3).
Dental workers are prone to occupational health-related
problems occupational health problems, with dental hazards being of a physical, biological, chemical, and psychosocial nature4). Musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs), eye injuries, vibration-induced neuropathy, and psychological
conditions are some of the poor health outcomes due to
occupational health issues5). Problems such as contact dermatitis, hearing loss, and toxicity from materials used
during dental practice have also been noted. Other risks
include incidents due to exposure to infectious diseases,
radiation, and noise, and allergy to dental materials6) . The
prevention of such injuries should be included in educa-
112
J Occup Health, Vol. 60, 2018
Fig. 1.
Diagram of the search strategy
tion and training, to reduce occupation-related health
problems among dental workers. This paper reports on
the scope and prevalence of occupation-related health
problems experienced by dentists, dental therapists, and
oral hygienists in their practice of dentistry.
traction sheet. All of the extracted data were then incorporated into an Excel spreadsheet to identify common
themes. Data extraction was done independently by two
reviewers, and consensus was reached on the inclusion of
manuscripts7,8).
Methodology
Results
The study targeted all empirical research, case studies,
and systematic literature reviews written in English. Letters to editors, conference proceedings, and policy statements were not considered. Articles were retrieved using
search engines e. g. , Ebscohost, PubMed, and Google
Scholar. Only articles published within a 15-year time period of 2001 and 2016 were included for review. The keywords/phrases included occupational health among dentists / dental therapists / hygienists, musculoskeletal problems among dentists/dental therapists/hygienists, risk factors for occupational health in dentistry, eye / sight / ear
problems in dentistry, dental occupational health, and occupational health among oral hygienists and dental therapists.
The titles, keywords, and abstracts of articles were considered for potential relevance, and the full articles were
obtained for those articles deemed to be relevant (Fig. 1).
The articles were then subjected to data extraction and
critical analysis through the use of a data extraction sheet.
The extraction sheet was piloted on five articles, and adjustments were made. The authors, study designs, participants, locations, interventions, prevalences, outcomes,
and conclusions were recorded in the electronic data ex-
The results are presented in a table format so as to summarize the methods, prevalence data, outcomes, and recommendations. The literature addressing occupational
health among dental practitioners includes mainly crosssectional studies and review papers. Most of the literature
(90%) addresses MSDs among dentists, with limited literature covering occupational health or MSDs among oral
hygienists and dental therapists. The selected studies focused on the prevalence of occupational health-related
problems and not on the intervention to potentially address the particular issue. Forty-nine studies were included in the review and were selected after an initial
electronic search through keywords (Table 1). The results
are presented as the prevalence of stress, burnout, musculoskeletal disease (back, neck, hands, and shoulders, etc.),
vision-related occupational health-related problems, percutaneous injury (PCI), noise, mercury-related occupational health issues, allergy, and infections. The outcomes
and recommendations of the studies were included (Table
1).
Title/Reference
Work-related musculoskeletal disorders in Australian dentists and orthodontists: Risk assessment
and prevention 9)
Relationship between
Comorbid Health Problems and Musculoskeletal Disorders Resulting
in Musculoskeletal
Complaints and Musculoskeletal Sickness
Absence among Employees in Korea 10)
Evaluation of musculoskeletal disorders in
dentists and application
of DMAIC technique to
improve the ergonomics
at dental clinics and
meta-analysis of literature 11)
Prevalence of musculoskeletal disorder and
alternative medicine
therapies among dentists
of North India: A descriptive study 12)
The relationship between
physical load and
musculoskeletal complaints among Brazilian
dentists 13)
Sample
Design
Prevalence
450 dentists Cross sectional 88.9%-dentists
83.6%-orthodontists
447 ortho- study
dontists
29,711
workers
Cross sectional 32.26%-muscular pain
study
60 dentists
Cross sectional 68.3%-MSD
study intervention
3598
dentists
Cross sectional 80%-MSD
study
Intervention by
complementary
and alternative
medicine
340 dentists Cross sectional 58.4%-lower back
study
Outcome
Recommendations
Less than1/3 received ergonomics training.
Musculoskeletal problems which were
associated with increased levels of stress at
work.
More research into interventions.
For management of musculoskeletal
complaints in the workplace, differences in
health problems between employees with
musculoskeletal complaints as well as the
physical and psychological risk factors
should be considered.
After three months only 23 respondents
applied ergonomics at their work place,
prevalence of pain was reduced in neck
from 47.8% to 21.7% out of total 23 respondents, shoulder pain 39.1% to 17.3%,
pain in elbows from 26% to 21.7%, as well
as in other locomotor organs. The p-value
was significant with p<0.05.
Complementary and alternative medicine
was remarkably good for MSD management.
Pain complaints were associated with the
following characteristics: awkward posture
at work; prolonged standing or sitting;
strenuous position of the upper limbs;
excessive tightening of the hands during
clinical treatment; and the use of vibrating
tools.
The outcome highlights the need of workshops to create awareness of ergonomics as
effective measures for reducing MSD
among dentists.
Rajeshree Moodley, et al.: Occupational health problems in dentistry
Table 1. Results
Complementary and alternative medicine
should be scientifically tested to establish
those that work.
Randomised control trial should be conducted to establish efficacy.
The results of the present study suggest a
high prevalence of musculoskeletal complaints in dentists that are significantly
associated with variables related to their
physical workload.
113
Title/Reference
Sample
Design
Prevalence
Outcome
Stress among dentists in
Yemen 14)
Stress was reflected in dentists with the
368 dentists Cross sectional The most prevalent factors
study
that contribute to stress were signs being musculoskeletal fatigue in 63%
and nervousness in 57.1%.
uncooperative patients
(72.3%), amount of work (too
much, too little) (60.5%) and
constant drive for technical
perfection (54.6%).
Occupational mercury
exposure in association
with prevalence of
multiple sclerosis and
tremor among US
dentists 15)
Prevalence of Upper
Extremity Musculoskeletal Disorders in Dentists: Symptoms and Risk
Factors 16)
Neck and upper extremity symptoms among
male dentists and pharmacists 17)
Occupational Hazards
among Dentists: A
Descriptive Study 18)
13902
dentists
Investigative
0.18% reported MS and
1.24% reported tremor.
130 dentists Descriptive,
55.9%-neck
Cross sectional 43.8%-shoulder
study
39.2%-waist
34.5%-wrist
32.5%-back
252 dentists Cross sectional 76.2%-neck or hands
study
66 dentists
Hg0 exposure was not associated with MS
15% of the subjects had to leave their clinic
or reduce their work hours, and overall
68.9% of the subjects reported that they had
experienced pain and discomfort at least
once over the last year
Praying and reading the Quran was reported
by over two thirds (70.6%) of the participants to manage stress.
Dentists with less than 30 years of experience displayed more stress.
Lack of experience, low income, uncooperative patients, and dental procedurerelated factors were the main significant
factors that caused stress
Occupational Hg0 exposure in US dentists
decreased over time and now is approaching that of the general population.
Our results suggest a positive association
between Hg0 exposure and tremor
High pain frequency and high risk levels
suggest inappropriate and incorrect ergonomic postural habits existing among dental
professionals
Male dentists are at risk of developing musculoskeletal disorders in the neck and upper
extremities more than male pharmacists
Cross sectional 83.3%-neck pain
study
9%-Allergy
59%-PCI
42.2%-stress
Regular physical exercise was associated
with decreased neck pain
As for psychosocial factors, high job
demand was associated with symptoms in
the shoulder
Working hours per day were associated with
neck paina
MSD most common problem and ergonomics not featured in dental curricular in India.
Continuing dental education programmes
should include education regarding ergonomics, new materials, operating methods,
new laws, vaccination 4)
Primary prevention
Early intervention
Continuous education
J Occup Health, Vol. 60, 2018
Prevalence of work-relat- 272 dentists Cross sectional 88%-MSD
ed musculoskeletal
study
83.8%-Neck
symptoms of the neck
and upper extremity
among dentists in China 19)
Recommendations
114
Table 1. Results (continued)
Title/Reference
Design and evaluation of
ergonomic interventions
for the prevention of
musculoskeletal disorders in India 20)
Use of complementary
and alternative medicine
for work related musculoskeletal disorders associated with job contentment
in dental professionals:
Indian outlook 21)
Work Characteristics and
musculoskeletal disorders among Postgraduate
Dental Students: A Pilot
Study 22)
Self-reported musculoskeletal pain among
dentists in South Africa:
A 12-month prevalence
study 23)
Sample
Design
Prevalence
Case study
Outcome
Recommendations
Proper implementation of ergonomic
interventions can improve the economy of
the nation
The cause for concern is that most of the
interventions are not properly designed
601 dentists Cross sectional 82%-MSD
study
Dentists who do not suffer from MSD
experience higher job satisfaction.
Dentists who use CAM therapies for the
prevention and management of WRMSD
may experience higher job satisfaction and
longevity than those who use conventional
therapies
264-dentists Cross sectional
who are
study/observapost gradu- tional
ate students
Correlation between body mass and pain
Females displayed more pain than males
Special attention should be paid to the
design of the working environment in faculties conforming to ergonomic principles
49%-MSD
34% lower back
26%-neck
20%-upper back
Musculoskeletal disorders, may substantially affect the over-all well-being of the
dentist.
Dentistry is a profession that is prone to
burnout with low energy and motivation
It suggested that ergonomics should be
covered in the educational system to reduce
risks to dental practitioners.
Musculoskeletal complaints may have
connection with general health. One must pay
attention with one’s nutrition and exercise
The dental staff must be informed in order
to recognize, control and prevent the
potential occupational hazards in the
workplace
115
338 dentists Cross sectional 79.9%-Neck
study
72.4%-Shoulders
69.8%-Lower back
54.5%-Upper back
24%-Hips/thighs
27.4%-Knees
19.6%-Ankles/feet
49.7%-Wrists/hands
59.3%-were aware of ergonomics
Ergonomics and muscu- 170 dentists Cross sectional 73.9%-MSD
study
31.7%-Neck
loskeletal disorder: As an
18.9%-Shoulder
occupational hazard in
7.2%-Arms
dentistry 24)
29.2%-Back
13%-Hands
152 dentists Cross sectional 91%-exposed to an occupaOccupational health
study
tional risk.
problems among dentists
41.8%-percutaneous injury
in Moldavian Region of
caused by sharp instruments
Romania 25)
in the last year.
49.3%-eye injuries caused by
solid particles
13.2%-blood splashes.
14.7% and/or chemicals
Rajeshree Moodley, et al.: Occupational health problems in dentistry
Table 1. Results (continued)
Title/Reference
Dental ergonomics to
combat musculoskeletal
disorders: A review 2)
Musculoskeletal disorders and symptom
severity among Australian dental hygienists 26)
A study on job postures
and musculoskeletal
illnesses in dentists 27)
Sample
Design
Prevalence
Review paper
624 hygien- Cross sectional 84.9%-neck
ists
study
69.7%-shoulder
68%-lower back
61.8%-upper back
60.1%-hand
65 dentists Cross sectional 75.9%-neck
and observa58.6%-shoulder
tional
56.9%-upper back
48.3%-lower back
44.8%-wrist
733 dentists Cross sectional 68%-MSD
Occupational health
study
42%-PCI
problems of dentists in the
18%-contact dermatitis
United Arab Emirates 28)
53%-eye
5%-hearing
review
Reports of musculoskeletal
Musculoskeletal disorders
symptoms among dental
and ergonomic risk factors
professionals are conspicuin dental practice 29)
ously high and manifested
mainly as neck, shoulder,
hand, arm wrist and low back
pain.
Recommendations
An interdisciplinary approach is necessary
to address the concern, and progressive
efforts should be taken to prevent MSDs in
dental professionals.
The problems start at undergraduate level
therefore interventions should begin there.
Promoting training on both ergonomics
(biomechanics) and stress reduction (psychosocial and physical) in dental schools as
a prevention strategy
MSD is a common problem that requires
medical attention.
Further research into the epidemiology, risk
factors, and impact on employment
Job analysis by the use of Rapid Entire Body
Assessment (REBA) showed that 89.6% of
limbs in group A and 79.3% of limbs in group
B had a score >4. Only neck and lower back
pain have significant relationship with the
risk levels obtained using the REBA method.
Work postures of dentists need to improve
Education, work station design, rest period
during work and regular physical activities
should be taken into account
Awareness of occupational health problems
should be highlighted in all research and
clinical congresses.
Further studies into the interventions to
reduce prevalence
Principles of ergonomics and design can be
applied to workstations so that there are
more neutral workstations.
Job rotations and work planning can be
introduced to prevent cumulative MSD.
Dental training to improve ergonomics.
Introduce micro breaks
Introduce flexibility and strengthening
exercises
Further research into causes of MSD
Knowledge of scope of ergonomics should
be disseminated.
Health and safety measures should be
researched and shared
J Occup Health, Vol. 60, 2018
Prevalence of musculo- 118 dentists Cross sectional 46.4%-neck
study
33.8%-Wrist
skeletal disorders among
28.8%-back
dentists in Kerman, Iran 30)
27.5%-shoulder
Outcome
116
Table 1. Results (continued)
Title/Reference
Sample
Design
90 dentists, Cross sectional
study
dental
therapists,
assistants
and technologists
Work-related musculo- 220 dentists Cross sectional
skeletal disorders among
study
dentists-a questionnaire
survey 32)
Occupational health
issues of oral health care
workers in Edo State,
Nigeria 31)
Prevalence and associated factors of back pain
among dental personnel
in the north eastern state
of Malaysia 6)
Musculoskeletal disorders among Brazilian
dentists 33)
Outcome
92%-MSD
47%-neck
35%-lower back
29%-fingers
23%-hip
20%-mid back
20%-shoulders
18.3%-knees
298 dentists Cross sectional 22.2%-back pain
study
86%-MSD
56%-back
47%-neck
26%-wrist
254 dentists Cross sectional 79.8%-MSD
study
58%-neck
52.7%-lumbar area
40.5%-back
27.1%-wrist
24.3%-shoulders
Recommendations
MSD was the predominant occupational
health problem and the potential impact
requires urgent educational and ergonomic
intervention
66.7%-wrist pain
76.7%-waist pain
84.4%-body pain
6.6%-Infection
17.8%-latex allergy
350 denCross sectional 44.9% back pain
tists, nurses study
and technicians
Risk factors and preva- 200 dentists Interviews
lence of musculoskeletal
disorders among Jordanian dentists 34)
Ergonomics and musculoskeletal pain among
postgraduate students
and faculty members of
the School of Dentistry
of the University of
Barcelona (Spain). A
cross-sectional study 35)
Prevalence
63.3%-no assistant
33% worked with no break
36.4% had one break.
More females experienced pain in the
fingers/males had more lower back symptoms
Significant relationships were found between MSDs and both standing work
position and non-use of rest breaks.
Risk factors were poor posture.
3.8%-work activities interrupted health
problems
The symptoms of MSDs increased with the
number of years of practice
Innovations for an ergonomically friendly
dental equipment would probably improve
the work practice and therefore the health of
dental personnel
Rajeshree Moodley, et al.: Occupational health problems in dentistry
Table 1. Results (continued)
Dentists are at higher risk to develop
musculoskeletal disorders, especially back
pain, arthritis, and tendonitis, than the
general population
Need for further training and continuing
education
Females reported more back pain and less
shoulder pain than males.
Neck, shoulder and back pain were significantly increased among older dentists and
dentists with more years of professional
experience
The participants who did stretching or other MSD is common among dentists with
preventive actions between patients suffered higher incidence among women.
lesser low back pain.
The neck is the most affected.
Oral surgeons showed a higher incidence of
neck pain
117
Title/Reference
Sample
Glutathione enzyme and 515 dental
selenoprotein polymor- professionphisms associate with
als
mercury biomarker levels
in Michigan dental
professionals 36)
Occupational noiseinduced hearing loss 37)
Self-reported occupational health of general
dental practitioners 38)
Design
Cross sectional Dentists had significantly
Survey/investi- higher hair mercury levels
gative
compared to non-dentists.
review
750 dentists Cross sectional 47%-dermatitis
59%-neck
study
57%-lower back
45%-shoulders
1670
Cross sectional 91%-Back pain
dentists
study
57.1%-back pain
83.1%-hanks
42%-emotional exhaustion
8%-burnout on all 3 scales
52%-treating children as a
stressor
48%-time pressure
43% high levels of concentration
247 dentists Cross sectional 57%-eye protection in laborastudy
tory
Female higher prevalence than male
19%-workplace bullying
94.7%-burnout
Higher levels of work engagement were
found amongst dentists who had additional
professional qualifications, worked longer
hours and worked in large group practices.
Recommendations
While dentists’ occupational exposures are
higher than the average population, a shift
toward use of composite resin fillings and
safer handling of mercury may result in
dentists having urine biomarker levels comparable to that of the general population
Hearing conservation program (decrease
source and level of noise)
Providing free protective devices and
training to be given on proper use
Should be a permissible exposure level
In a high noise environment-a 12 hour shift
should be followed by a day off.
Performing periodic hearing appraisals
Pregnant women-exposure to noise-affects
the hearing of the unborn child
The prevalence of musculoskeletal problems and dermatoses was high and impacted significantly on the daily lives of dentists
Early treatment and diagnosis
Increased knowledge of dental workers
Assessing impact of patient care is critical
Work stress relieving factors were exercise, Cope using active coping strategies
forgetting about work and interaction with
people
Eye protection compliance was low
The need for eye protection in all clinics
and labs.
Bi annual eye tests
J Occup Health, Vol. 60, 2018
Self-reported occupational health issues
among Lithuanian
dentists 39)
Occupational burnout
354 dentists Cross sectional
study
and work engagement: a
national survey of
dentists in the United
Kingdom 40)
700 dentists Cross sectional
Job stressors of New
study
Zealand dentists and their
coping strategies 41)
Eye care habits of
dentists registered in the
United Kingdom 42)
Outcome
Prevalence
118
Table 1. Results (continued)
Title/Reference
Sample
Design
Prevalence
The effect of tool handle
Experimental
shape on hand muscle
load and pinch force in a
simulated dental scaling
task 43)
Outcome of career
110 dentists Cross sectional 55.2%-stress at work
study
45.1%-staff management
expectancies and early
professional burnout
among newly qualified
dentists 44)
Recommendations
The instrument handle with a tapered, round
shape and a 10mm diameter required the
least muscle load and pinch force when
performing simulated periodontal work.
Modify work practice by rescheduling
patients with heavy calculus, taking breaks
and using sharp instruments. This will
reduce MSD of the upper extremities
Practice management is the professional
aspect about which young professionals
worry most. It is recommended that dental
schools pay attention to practice management skills and the stressfulness of work in
the curriculum
Pilot audiometric data showed a hearing loss Further studies are required to provide more
at 4,000 Hz for the left ear, indicative of
details on the risks for occupational hearing
occupational noise trauma.
impairment and vibration hand neuropathy
The two-point discrimination ability of the and to determine whether the problems
dominant hand tended to diminish in line
described were related to the practice of
with the number of years of practice.
dentistry
Mercury levels in whole blood were not
high in exposed dentists, although it was
reported that dentists have almost twice the
concentration of mercury in their blood as
non-dentists
Eye protection is sub optimal and it should
in this environment
Implementation of ergonomics decreases
MSD.
Creating guidelines for the implementation
of ergonomics
119
380 dentists Cross sectional 54%-low back pain, (stressstudy
correlated);
52.3%-vision problems,
(age-correlated)
9%-infections
22.5%-allergies, (mainly
latex)
7-stress level was scored on a
scale from 0 to 10;
6%-diminished sensitivity of
the fingertips
19.6%-auditory disorders
10 dentists Cross sectional Statistical correlation was
Mercury Exposure in
Dental Practice 46)
study and inves- found between blood mercury
tigative
levels and the duration of time
working in dental offices
(r=0.01); this ranged from 5
to 9 years.
138 dentists Cross sectional 80%-wore eye protection
Eye safety in operative
and hygien- study
48%-experienced ocular trauma
dentistry—A study in
96% of hygienists wore eye
general dental practice 47) ists
protection
The dentists saw a clear
Evaluation of ergonomic 57 dentists Intervention
Cross sectional relation between their impleinterventions to reduce
study
mentation of recommendamusculoskeletal disortions and a reduction in MSD;
ders of dentists in the
72% of the dentists reported a
Netherlands 48)
reduction or disappearance of
the main complaint.
Potential occupational
health problems for
dentists in Flanders,
Belgium 45)
Outcome
Rajeshree Moodley, et al.: Occupational health problems in dentistry
Table 1. Results (continued)
Title/Reference
Visual impairment on
dentists related to occupational mercury exposure 49)
Sample
15 dentists
Prevalence of musculo- 430 dentists
skeletal disorders in
dentists 50)
Mercury vapour levels in 180 dental
dental practices and body surgeries
mercury levels of dentists
and controls 51)
Design
Cross sectional/
comparative/
investigative
Cross sectional 62%-MSD
study
Cross sectional Urinary mercury levels of
Investigative
dentists were 4 times higher
than control
Prevalence of Carpal
305 hygien- Cross sectional
ists
Tunnel Syndrome and
Investigative
upper extremity tendinitis among dental hygienists 52)
264 dentists Interview and
Back & neck problems
observation
among dentists and
dental auxiliaries 53)
Mercury vapour release
from a dental aspirator 54)
Outcome
Recommendations
Contrast sensitivity functions were also
significantly affected in the group of
dentists compared to the age-matched
control group. They were uniformly reduced
at all spatial frequencies examined for both
luminance and chromatic (red-green and
blue-yellow) contrasts.
The physical load among dentists seems to
put them at risk for the occurrence of
musculoskeletal disorders.
80%-environmental mercury above occupational exposure standard
Reduction in the use of mercury
Monitoring
Adoption of safety protection
Regular monitoring of dentists’ visual functions in order to evaluate the presence of
very low-level mercury exposure
28%-Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
7%-tendonitis
54.4%-neck pain
73.5%-back pain
37%-of those complaining of
back pain sought medical help.
Investigative
10 times more air concentra- Venting of aspirated waste air to the outside
tion of mercury vapour-25 μg/ is clearly desirable in view of the findings of
m3 is the current limit of
this report.
occupational exposure
178 dentists Cross sectional 78%-musculoskeletal pain
study
50%-percutaneous injury
22%-contact dermatitis
mostly caused by allergy to
latex gloves
15%-eye problems
3%-hearing problems.
Psychosocial aspects should be taken into
account when investigating MSD
Greater emphasis is needed in the safe
handling of mercury greater emphasis
should be made relating to safe handling of
amalgam in the training and continuing professional development of dentists
The prevalence of hand and finger symptoms in the dominant hand among dental
hygienists in this study was high.
Prevalence for CTS was nearly the same as
the general population
Aerobic and relaxation exercise to prevent
limitations and to increase productive years
Posture correction and weight monitoring
The safety of dental aspirators with respect
to mercury emissions warrants further
research
Further continuing education as a recommendation in the avoidance of PI/allergens
To identify appropriate intervention to
reduce its prevalence
Further studies are needed to identify
causes of musculoskeletal pain and to
identify appropriate interventions to reduce
its prevalence, as would similar measures to
reduce exposure to agents which may be
producing contact dermatitis
J Occup Health, Vol. 60, 2018
Occupational health
problems of dentists in
southern Thailand 55)
Prevalence
120
Table 1. Results (continued)
Rajeshree Moodley, et al.: Occupational health problems in dentistry
Discussion
The prevalence of occupational health-related problems
is a concern among dental practitioners, with MSDs,
stress, and PCIs being the most prevalent problems. A
number of studies have found that occupational healthrelated problems are on the increase, despite new and innovative equipment being developed and used in dental
practice. Several studies showed that dental workers presented with at least one occupational hazard 25,31) . To illustrate this, in the Moldavian region of Romania, the majority of dentists (91%) considered that they were exposed to
at least one occupational risk25). Biswas et al., in a review
paper, concurred that musculoskeletal symptoms among
dental professionals were conspicuously high and manifested mainly as neck, shoulder, hand, arm, wrist, and
lower back pain. The capabilities of the dental worker,
job demands, and improper work process and hand tool
use impose strain on the musculoskeletal system29). MSDs
were the most common occupational health-related problems reported among dentists in the Edo State of Nigeria.
These findings led the researchers to conclude that urgent
education and ergonomic intervention are needed 31) . This
review showed that female dentists had a higher prevalence of occupational health-related problems compared
with that of male dentists 22,32,34,38) . Ayers et al. reported
higher incidences of percutaneous injuries ( PCIs ) and
MSDs among female practitioners, which places women
at a higher risk of health problems38).
Stress and burnout
Stress among dentists is prevalent, and this expresses a
need for a stress management system. Practice and financial management are stressors among young dentists 56) .
The majority of dentists in the Puriene et al. study complained of burnout ( 94.7% ) , and 40.5% of those with
burnout presented with chronic symptoms39). A report of a
study conducted in the UK stated that 42% of surveyed
dentists displayed high scores of emotional exhaustion 40) .
Factors that caused stress among newly qualified dentists
were those concerning legal and insurance matters
(61.2%), practice organization (56.6%), and staff management (55.2%)44). The most common stressors reported
for a New Zealand study were treating difficult children
(52%), time pressures (48%), and maintaining high levels
of concentration (43%)41). Stress (50%) and lapses in concentration and fatigue (32.9%) were the most common
causes for needle-stick injury (NSI) 57) . To improve this
situation, there is a need to look at dentistry curricula and
to investigate whether each dentistry curriculum prepares
students to manage a practice. Patients with fear present
to dental practitioners and students. There is concern that
undergraduate training does not prepare dentistry students
to deal with fear in their patients. This leads to stress and
121
anxiety. Alzahem et al. suggest that students should have
access to psychologists to teach them how to deal with
fear56) . Psychologists in a dental training context can also
assist students with strategies to deal with their own fears,
i.e., the fear of failing and dealing with their fears, and
this in turn will assist the students to cope with fears in
private practice. Strategies to cope with stress and burnout were identified as active coping, planning, religion,
sports, forgetting about work, interaction with people, and
acceptance41,58).
Musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs)
The most common sites for MSDs were neck, lower
back, and shoulders38). Women showed a higher frequency
of intense pain involving the cervical, lumbar, dorsal, and
wrist areas (p < 0.05), placing them at a higher risk of injury 35) . Although the study of Alexandre et al. reported a
higher prevalence of complaints from male dentists about
back pain, the authors reported that female dentists were
at higher risk of tendonitis33).
The introduction of the principles of ergonomics in
practice is suggested by many researchers2,4,11,24,29,30,48) . This
is not consistent with the study conducted by Rafeemanesh et al., where 60% of the participants were aware
of correct ergonomic posture, yet nearly 74% of these
dentists reported MSDs of the back and neck being the
most painful 27) . For that study, the researchers also reported that pain increased with age and time spent in
clinical practice and that the specialty whose practitioners
were at greatest risk was prosthodontics27). The Rafie et al.
study using both a cross-sectional survey and observation
using rapid upper-limb assessment showed that 82.8% of
the subjects were at risk of MSDs. Nearly 69% of the
subjects in that study had experienced pain and discomfort over the preceeding 12-month period, while 15% had
to leave clinical work or reduce the hours worked due to
MSD symptoms 16) . The prevalence of hand and finger
symptoms was high among dental hygienists, with a high
rate of upper extremity tendonitis 59) . The job-related activities of dental hygienists, including the use of vibratory
tools and the repetitive nature of their work, places these
practitioners at risk for MSDs of the hands. MSDs of the
neck (85%), shoulder (70%), and lower back (68%) regions were frequently reported by dental hygienists26). The
information gathered from a study of Swedish dentists
tended to put dentists at the higher end of the spectrum of
healthcare professionals in terms of severity of musculoskeletal injury and lost work time. This emphasizes the
need to educate newly qualified practitioners and students
on musculoskeletal health60). However, job posture analysis revealed that the extraction of the left and right lower
jaw teeth, and also extraction of the right upper jaw teeth
and restoration of the upper teeth, exacerbated the worst
job postures 27) . A higher incidence of wrist pain was recorded for professionals exclusively dedicated to oral sur-
122
gery (p < 0.05 ) . No statistically significant correlation
was found between the workload (hours) and pain in the
different anatomical locations (p > 0.05) 35) . Despite the
evidence of the occurrence of MSD pain caused by the
work done by dental health workers, job posture analysis
and workplace analysis are not carried out very often in
dentistry. These forms of analysis should be carried out
by new and old practitioners to remove risks in dental
practice, thereby reducing the prevalence of MSDs.
Vision-related occupational health issues
Ocular hazards are common in dentistry 61) . Extreme
caution should be taken when performing clinical work.
The most striking evidence reported from the Lönnroth &
Shahnavaz study is that few dentists use eye protection.
The hazards reported in that study include injury from rotary instruments and chemical handling61). Chadwick concluded that a limited use of eye protection exposed dentists to unnecessary occupational risks 42) . The CantoPereira et al. study investigated visual impairment and occupational exposure to mercury among dentists and found
that visual color discrimination and contrast sensitivity
were indicators of a subtle neurotoxic effect of elemental
mercury 49) . The use of mercury in Nordic countries is
banned, with other countries proposing the phasing down
of amalgam use until an amalgam replacement can be
found. Visits to ophthalmologists should be regular, as
dental work impacts vision, yet Chadwick et al. found
that dentists with known eyesight problems were the only
ones who presented for regular eye examinations. The
study also found that the use of magnification was not
universally adopted and that eye protection compliance
was low 42) . Magnification enhances vision, preventing
dental practitioners from bending their necks, thereby decreasing the chances of developing MSDs.
Percutaneous injury (PCI)
In Southern Thailand, PCI was experienced by 50% of
dentists, while 41.8% of dentists in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) experienced at least one PCI in the previous
year 25,55) . In a German study, 61.7% of dentists sustained
at least one NSI. The injuries were caused by surgical devices (46.2%), needles (25.4%), and scalpels (14.2%).
Only a few injuries were due to bite wounds (3.6%), skin
contact (0.6%), and muco-cutaneous contact ( 6.5% ) 57) .
Wicker & Rabenau and Leggat et al. concurred that students and younger dentists were at risk of PCIs 57,62) . This
demonstrates the importance of education programs for
younger dentists and vigilant supervision of dental students.
Noise
More studies need to be conducted into the effects of
noise on the dental worker. Noise in dental training is significant, and this is highlighted by Sampaio Fernandes et
J Occup Health, Vol. 60, 2018
al., who stated that the noisiest area is the gypsum and
prosthetic laboratory, followed by the preclinical area.
They further described clinical areas as having continuous
high noise levels, especially for clinical supervisors and
students. According to their research, the minimal acoustic comfort level is required in a dental setting and, to
achieve this, sound levels have to be reduced by at least
10 dBa 63) . Szymanska and Chopra & Pandey concurred
that the noise of the suction devices, salivary ejectors, turbines, amalgamators, model trimmers, mixing devices, ultrasonic scalers, and compressors causes impaired hearing 64,65) . Occupational noise is the most common cause of
hearing loss in adults. Noise-induced hearing loss is irreversible, as there is damage to the cochlear hair cells of
the inner ear and if staff and students are in a skills lab
where there is constant noise then they are exposed to irreparable damage to their ears. Given that mercury exposure affects the auditory senses, dentists and dental therapists who are exposed to dental amalgam from the time of
undergraduate training and throughout practice are at
greater risk due to long-term use 37) . Additional risks are
the quality of hand pieces used in dental training and
practice, which differs for different manufacturers, and so
does the associated noise level. Newly qualified dental
practitioners order equipment on the basis of funding and
affordablility rather than looking at the noise levels. Surgery design is an important factor in the reduction of
noise64). Furthermore, noise reduction in a dental setting is
needed for both patient and operator comfort.
Mercury-related occupational health-related problems
Mercury exposure as measured in the dental operatory
zone was found to be 10 times greater than the acceptable
exposure levels after 20 minutes of aspiration; this is due
to the corrugated tubing that traps amalgam 54) . A significant difference was reported between the level of urinary
mercury of Scottish dentists and that of a control group,
with the levels of dentists being 4.17 times higher in a
Scottish study 51) . In a study conducted by Atesagaoglu et
al., mercury levels in whole blood were not high among
the dentists, although this was not the case in other studies. The methyl mercury level was higher than mercury in
blood, and the authors concluded that mercury from other
sources was a greater risk than the mercury found in
amalgam 46) . There was a positive association between
mercury exposure and tremors among American dentists66). Dental operators were found to have a significantly
higher hair mercury level than non-dentists in a Michigan
study 36) . Dental students in a restorative clinic work with
dental amalgam and are exposed to mercury from 1st to
5th year. This exposure is a source of blood mercury, as
mercury crosses the pulmonary membrane and reaches
the blood stream. Improvement of mercury hygiene and
technical equipment can reduce exposure to mercury. The
curriculum of restorative dentistry includes mercury han-
123
Rajeshree Moodley, et al.: Occupational health problems in dentistry
dling and care, but there is a need to include this topic in
clinical and preclinical training and in continuous professional development activities67).
Mercury vapor inhaled by dental operators is retained
in the brain, endocrine organs, and other tissues. Cutright
et al., as cited by Guzzi et al., stated that there was a positive correlation between inhaled mercury dust and deposition of the inhaled mercury in blood and tissues 68) . This
reveals the need for a phase-down approach to amalgam
use and the corresponding increased use of amalgam alternatives.
Allergy
Allergy, mainly latex related ( 22.5% ) , was reported
among dentists from Belgium where potential occupational health problems were investigated45). A latex allergy
presents as pruritus, urticaria, eczema, and asthma. Almost half the sample of dentists (47%) had experienced a
dermatitis-type condition in the previous 12 months in
New Zealand38). Allergies associated with professional activity were reported by 76.1% of the dentists in the
UAE 25) . Dentistry is regarded as “wet work” which may
damage the skin barrier and lead to exposure to skin irritants and sensitivity to components in gloves. Airway irritants may also be present in the work environment of dental workers 69) . Dental students are intensive users of
gloves, which places them at risk of latex allergies. The
type of gloves used in training is central to sensitization
rates and latex-allergy symptoms. Low-protein nonpowdered gloves reduce exposure to the latex allergen45).
Infection
Belgian dentists ( 9% ) reported infections related to
dentistry 45) . In the UAE, 74.6% of dentists are protected
by vaccination against Hepatitis B and 76.1% against influenza 25) . PCIs due to the small operating field, patient
movement, and the variety of sharp instruments used on a
daily basis are greater in a dental setting and teaching environment when compared with those in other healthcare
settings. This exposes dental staff to HIV and Hepatitis B
and Hepatitis C viruses. A hands-on approach in the students’ learning process and the introduction of safer products and clinical procedures should form part of the curriculum to protect the student70).
A limitation to this review includes the number of articles selected and the fact that articles written only in English were selected.
Conclusion
This review shows that occupational health-related
problems still affect dental workers, with MSDs being the
most frequent problem. More research is being conducted
among dentists than among dental therapists and oral hygienists, with great gaps about factors affecting the health
of dental therapists and oral hygienists. The prevalence
and the investigative studies highlight the need for continuous professional education and a need to review dentistry curricula at a tertiary level.
Further research is required, where stresses and strains
are measured while dental workers carry out their normal
duties, and interventions need to be identified to reduce
the prevalence of MSDs. More studies are needed in the
occupational hearing-impairment area. Mercury handling
should be made safer, and it is imperative that newer and
safer dental materials be introduced from the level of undergraduate training and throughout practice.
Conflicts of interest: None declared.
References
1) Puriene A, Janulyte V, Musteikyte M, et al. General health of
dentists. Literature review. Stomatologija 2007; 9(1): 10-20.
2) Gupta A, Ankola AV, Hebbal M. Dental ergonomics to combat musculoskeletal disorders: a review. International Journal
of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics 2013; 19(4): 561-571.
3) WHO. Global strategy on occupational health for all: the way
to health at work, recommendation of the Second Meeting of
the WHO Collaborating Centres in Occupational Health, 1114 October 1994, Beijing, China. 1995.
4) Reddy V, Bennadi D, Satish G, et al. Occupational hazards
among dentists: A descriptive study. Journal of Oral Hygiene
& Health 2015; 3(5): 1-4.
5) Leggat P, Kedjarune U, Smith DR. Occupational health problems in modern dentistry: A review. Industrial Health 2007;
45: 611-621.
6) Samat A, Shafei M, Yaacob N, et al. Prevalence and associated factors of back pain among dental personnel in the north
eastern state of Malaysia. International Journal of Collaborative Research on Internal Medicine and Public Health 2011; 3:
576-586.
7) Dochy F. A guide for writing scholarly articles or reviews for
the Educational Research Review. Educational Research Review 2006; 4: 1-2.
8) Cronin P, Ryan F, Coughlan M. Undertaking a literature review : a step-by-step approach. British Journal of Nursing
2008; 17(1): 38-43.
9) Sakzewski L, Naser-ud-Din S. Work-related musculoskeletal
disorders in Australian dentists and orthodontists: risk assessment and prevention. Work 2015; 52(3): 559-579.
10) Baek JH, Kim YS, Yi KH. Relationship between comorbid
health problems and musculoskeletal disorders resulting in
musculoskeletal complaints and musculoskeletal sickness absence among employees in Korea. Safety and Health at Work
2015; 6(2): 128-133.
11) Bedi H, Moon NJ, Bhatia V, et al. Evaluation of musculoskeletal disorders in dentists and application of DMAIC
technique to improve the ergonomics at dental clinics and
meta-analysis of literature. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic
Research 2015; 9(6): ZC01.
124
12) Gupta D, Mathur A, Patil GI, et al. Prevalence of musculoskeletal disorder and alternative medicine therapies among
dentists of North India: A descriptive study. Pharmacognosy
Research 2015; 7(4): 350-354.
13) Dantas FFO, de Lima KC. The relationship between physical
load and musculoskeletal complaints among Brazilian dentists.
Applied Ergonomics 2015; 47: 93-98.
14) Al-Zubair NM, Sultan Al-ak’hali M, Ghandour IA. Stress
among dentists in Yemen. The Saudi Journal for Dental Research 2015; 6(2): 140-145.
15) Anglen J, Gruninger SE, Chou HN, et al. Occupational mercury exposure in association with prevalence of multiple sclerosis and tremor among US dentists. The Journal of the
American Dental Association 2015; 146(9): 659-668. e1.
16) Rafie F, Zamani Jam A, Shahravan A, et al. Prevalence of upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders in dentists: symptoms
and risk factors. Journal of Environmental and Public Health
2015; 2015: 1-6.
17) Aminian O, Alemohammad ZB, Hosseini MH. Neck and upper extremity symptoms among male dentists and pharmacists.
Work 2015; 51(4): 863-868.
18) Reddy V, Bennadi D, Satish G, et al. Occupational hazards
among dentists: A descriptive study. Journal of Oral Hygiene
& Health 2015; 3(185): doi: 10.4172/2332.0702.1000185.
19) Feng B, Liang Q, Wang Y, et al. Prevalence of work-related
musculoskeletal symptoms of the neck and upper extremity
among dentists in China. BMJ open 2014; 4(12): e006451.
20) Gangopadhyay S, Dev S. Design and evaluation of ergonomic
interventions for the prevention of musculoskeletal disorders
in India. Annals of Occupational and Environmental Medicine
2014; 26(1): 18.
21) Devanand G, John BD, Rajendra GK, et al. Use of complementary and alternative medicine for work related musculoskeletal disorders associated with job contentment in dental
professionals: Indian outlook. Ethiopian Journal of Health Sciences 2014; 24(2): 117-124.
22) Kur"un!, Evirgen S, Akbulut N, et al. Work characteristics
and musculoskeletal disorders among postgraduate dental students: A pilot study. Journal of Musculoskeletal Pain 2014; 22
(1): 62-67.
23) Botha P, Chikte U, Esterhuizen T, et al. Self-reported musculoskeletal pain among dentists in South Africa: A 12-month
prevalence study. South African Dental Journal 2014; 69(5):
208-213.
24) Gopinadh A, Devi KNN, Chiramana S, et al. Ergonomics and
musculoskeletal disorder: as an occupational hazard in dentistry. The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice 2013; 14
(2): 299.
25) Bârlean L, D#nil#I, S#veanu I, Balco"C. Occupational health
problems among dentists in Moldavian Region of Romania.
Revista medico-chirurgicala a Societatii de Medici si Naturalisti din Iasi 2013; 117(3): 784-788.
26) Hayes MJ, Smith DR, Taylor JA. Musculoskeletal disorders
and symptom severity among Australian dental hygienists.
BMC Research Notes 2013; 6(1): 250.
J Occup Health, Vol. 60, 2018
27) Rafeemanesh E, Jafari Z, Kashani FO, et al. A study on job
postures and musculoskeletal illnesses in dentists. International Journal of Occupational Medicine and Environmental
Health 2013; 26(4): 615-620.
28) Al Ali K, Hashim R. Occupational health problems of dentists
in the United Arab Emirates. International Dental Journal
2012; 62(1): 52-56.
29) Biswas R, Sachdev V, Jindal V, et al. Musculoskeletal disorders and ergonomic risk factors in dental practice. Indian Journal of Dental Practice 2012; 4: 70-74.
30) Chamani G, Zarei MR, Momenzadeh A, et al. Prevalence of
musculoskeletal disorders among dentists in Kerman, Iran.
Journal of Musculoskeletal Pain 2012; 20(3): 202-207.
31) Osazuwa Peters N, Azodo CC, Obuekwe ON. Occupational
health issues of oral health care workers in Edo State, Nigeria.
International Dental Journal 2012; 62(3): 117-121.
32) Kierklo A, Kobus A, Jaworska M, et al. Work-related muculoskeletal disorders among dentists-a questionnaire survey.
Annals of Agricultural and Environmental Medicine 2011; 18
(1): 79-84.
33) Alexandre PCB, da Silva ICM, de Souza LMG, et al. Musculoskeletal disorders among Brazilian dentists. Archives of environmental & occupational health 2011; 66(4): 231-235.
34) Barghout NH, Al-Habashneh R, Al-Omiri MK. Risk factors
and prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders among Jordanian
dentists. Jordan Medical Journal 2011; 45(2): 195-204.
35) Harutunian K, Gargallo Albiol J, Barbosa de Figueiredo RP, et
al. Ergonomics and musculoskeletal pain among postgraduate
students and faculty members of the School of Dentistry of the
University of Barcelona ( Spain ) . A cross-sectional study.
Medicina Oral, Patología Oral y Cirugia Bucal 2011; 16(3):
425-429.
36) Goodrich JM, Wang Y, Gillespie B, et al. Glutathione enzyme
and selenoprotein polymorphisms associate with mercury
biomarker levels in Michigan dental professionals. Toxicology
and Applied Pharmacology 2011; 257(2): 301-308.
37) Azizi MH. Occupational noise-induced hearing loss. The International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine 2010; 1(3): 116-123.
38) Ayers K, Thomson W, Newton J, et al. Self-reported occupational health of general dental practitioners. Occupational
Medicine 2009; 59(3): 142-148.
39) Puriene A, Aleksejuniene J, Petrauskiene J, et al. Self-reported
occupational health issues among Lithuanian dentists. Industrial Health 2008; 46(4): 369-374.
40) Denton D, Newton J, Bower E. Occupational burnout and
work engagement: a national survey of dentists in the United
Kingdom. British Dental Journal 2008; 205(7): 382-383.
41) Ayers K, Thomson W, Newton J, et al. Job stressors of New
Zealand dentists and their coping strategies. Occupational
Medicine 2008; 58(4): 275-281.
42) Chadwick R, Alatsaris M, Ranka M. Eye care habits of dentists registered in the United Kingdom. British Dental Journal
2007; 203(4): E7.
43) Dong H, Loomer P, Barr A, et al. The effect of tool handle
125
Rajeshree Moodley, et al.: Occupational health problems in dentistry
shape on hand muscle load and pinch force in a simulated dental scaling task. Applied Ergonomics 2007; 38(5): 525-531.
44) Gorter R, Storm M, Brake JT, et al. Outcome of career expectancies and early professional burnout among newly qualified
dentists. International Dental Journal 2007; 57(4): 279-285.
45) Gijbels F, Jacobs R, Princen K, et al. Potential occupational
health problems for dentists in Flanders, Belgium. Clinical
Oral Investigations 2006; 10(1): 8-16.
46) Atesagaoglu A, Omurlu H, Ozcagli E, et al. Mercury exposure
in dental practice. Operative Dentistry 2006; 31(6): 666-669.
47) Farrier S, Farrier J, Gilmour A. Eye safety in operative
dentistry-A study in general dental practice. British Dental
Journal 2006; 200(4): 218-223.
48) Droeze EH, Jonsson H. Evaluation of ergonomic interventions
to reduce musculoskeletal disorders of dentists in the Netherlands. Work 2005; 25(3): 211-220.
49) Canto-Pereira LH, Lago M, Costa MF, et al. Visual impairment on dentists related to occupational mercury exposure.
Environmental Toxicology and Pharmacology 2005; 19 ( 3 ):
517-522.
50) Alexopoulos EC, Stathi IC, Charizani F. Prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders in dentists. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 2004; 5(1): 16.
51) Ritchie K, Burke F, Gilmour W, et al. Mercury vapour levels
in dental practices and body mercury levels of dentists and
controls. British Dental Journal 2004; 197(10): 625-632.
52) Werner R, Hamann C, Franzblau A, et al. Prevalence of carpal
tunnel syndrome and upper extremity tendinitis among dental
hygienists. Journal of Dental Hygiene: JDH 2002; 76(2): 126132.
53) Al Wassan K, Almas K, Al Shethri S, et al. Back & neck problems among dentists and dental auxiliaries. Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice 2001; 2(3): 17-30.
54) Stonehouse C, Newman A. Mercury vapour release from a
dental aspirator. British Dental Journal 2001; 190(10): 558565.
55) Chowanadisai S, Kukiattrakoon B, Yapong B, et al. Occupational health problems of dentists in southern Thailand. International Dental Journal 2000; 50(1): 36-40.
56) Alzahem AM, Van der Molen HT, Alaujan AH, et al. Stress
management in dental students: a systematic review. Advances
in Medical Education and Practice 2014; 5: 167-176.
57) Wicker S, Rabenau HF. Occupational exposures to bloodborne
viruses among German dental professionals and students in a
clinical setting. International Archives of Occupational and
Environmental Health 2010; 83(1): 77-83.
58) Al-Sowygh ZH. Academic distress, perceived stress and cop-
ing strategies among dental students in Saudi Arabia. The
Saudi Dental Journal 2013; 25(3): 97-105.
59) Werner RA, Hamann C, Franzblau PA. Prevalence of Carpal
Tunnel Syndrome and upper extremity tendinitus among dental hygienists. Journal of Dental Hygiene 2002; 76: 126-132.
60) Cherniack M, Dussetschleger J, Bjor B. Musculoskeletal disease and disability in dentists. Work 2010; 35(4): 411-418.
61) Lönnroth EC, Shahnavaz H. Users’ demands regarding dental
safety glasses. Combining a quantitative approach and
grounded theory for the data analysis. International Journal of
Occupational Safety and Ergonomics 2001; 7(1): 49-59.
62) Leggat PA, Chowanadisai S, Kedjarune U, et al. Health of
dentists in southern Thailand. International Dental Journal
2001; 51(5): 348-352.
63) Sampaio Fernandes J, Carvalho A, Gallas M, et al. Noise levels in dental schools. European Journal of Dental Education
2006; 10(1): 32-37.
64) Szyma!ska J. Work-related noise hazards in the dental surgery. Annals of agricultural and environmental medicine
2000; 7: 67-70.
65) Chopra S, Pandey S. Occupational hazards among dental surgeons. Medical Journal Armed Forces India 2007; 63(1): 2325.
66) Diaz-Caballero AJ, Gómez-Palencia IP, Díaz-Cárdenas S. Ergonomic factors that cause the presence of pain muscle in students of dentistry. Medicina Oral Patologia Oral y Cirugia Bucal 2010; 15(6): e906.
67) Tezel H, Ertas O, Ozata F, et al. Occupational health: Blood
mercury levels of dental students and dentists at a dental
school. British Dental Journal 2001; 191(8): 449-452.
68) Guzzi G, Pigatto PD, Ronchi A, et al. Exposure to mercury
among Norwegian dentists and dental healthcare personnel.
Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health 2010;
36: 430-431.
69) Schedle A, Örtengren U, Eidler N, et al. Do adverse effects of
dental materials exist? What are the consequences, and how
can they be diagnosed and treated? Clinical Oral Implants Research 2007; 18(s3): 232-256.
70) Younai FS, Murphy DC, Kotelchuck D. Occupational exposures to blood in a dental teaching environment: results of a
ten-year surveillance study. Journal of Dental Education 2001;
65(5): 436-448.
Journal of Occupational Health is an Open Access article distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. To view the details of this license, please visit (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/).