J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol (2005) 18:167–174
Original Studies
Youth Preferences for Prenatal and Parenting Teen Services
Joanne E. Cox, MD1, Laura Bevill, BS1, Jessica Forsyth, MPH2, Sylvia Missal, MSW, LICSW,
MBA1, Mollie Sherry, MSW, LICSW1, and Elizabeth R. Woods, MD, MPH2
1
Division of General Pediatrics, 2Division of Adolescent Medicine, Children’s Hospital Boston, Boston, Massachusetts
Abstract. Study Objective: Parenting teens served by a
teen-tot program and teens from a prenatal clinic participated
in focus groups to explore their perceptions of medical care,
social services, and psycho-educational parenting groups.
Design: The teens met in four focus groups, two prenatal
and two postnatal.
Setting: Teens receiving care from a teen-tot program
and associated prenatal clinic in a large metropolitan area
in New England.
Participants: A total of 16 pregnant (n ⫽ 6) and parenting (n ⫽ 10) teens ages ranging from 16 to 21 years (13
African American, 2 Latina, and 1 Haitian) participated in
the four focus groups.
Methods: A qualitative focus group study was performed. Structured, culturally sensitive questions guided the
discussion based on a hypothetical case scenario. Themes
were identified through grounded theory with three coders
and differences were reconciled.
Results: The groups revealed prenatal and postnatal
mothers valued medical and social services provided in a
teen-focused hospital clinic. Prenatal teens looked to providers for health education services and group support. Parenting teens requested consistent doctors for their children and
social supports for themselves. Both groups desired assistance with social services, education, housing, and finances as well as educational services for fathers.
Conclusions: Teen parents’ perceptions and suggestions
for services are critical to program development that meets the
needs of participants.
Key Words. Focus groups—Parenting teens—Prenatal teens—Parenting groups—Teen-tot model
Address correspondence to: Joanne E. Cox, MD, Children’s Hospital Boston, 300 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115; E-mail:
Joanne.cox@childrens.harvard.edu
쑖 2005 North American Society for Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology
Published by Elsevier Inc.
Introduction
Despite major declines in teen pregnancy rates in the
last decade, 43 out of 1,000 teens between the ages
of 15 and 19 years gave birth during 2002.1,2 During
pregnancy, teens are at risk for poor compliance with
prenatal care, and teens under age 17 years have higher
incidence of medical complications.3,4 After delivery,
teen parents face significant socioeconomic risk, and
their children have higher incidence of development
delay and academic failure.3 Programs have been developed that include medical services, mental health
assistance, parenting groups, and advocacy.5 Studies
have shown that specialized prenatal and postnatal parenting programs can enhance prenatal care compliance,6
improve parenting abilities, and decrease family
stress.7
Along with medical and social services, parenting
groups are a modality used to enhance teens’ personal
development and child rearing abilities. Groups educate parenting teens on many topics they have not
yet learned because of their young age.8,9 Psychoeducational groups for prenatal and parenting teens
focus on infant care, child development, medical health,
the maternal/child relationship, and emotional wellbeing. Talking with other teen mothers enhances support and decreases isolation.10 Group participation may
provide teens with skills to overcome difficult personal
experiences and decrease repeat pregnancies.8
Interventions must be fine tuned to the specific
needs of the population. Conducting focus groups is
a well-known qualitative method of assessing a population’s needs and evaluating a program.11 Research
has shown that focus groups can be successful in
gathering health care perspectives from teens.12 Young
people’s perceptions of care may improve the mode
of health care and the responsiveness of the recipients
to the care.13 The objective of this study was to explore
1083-3188/05/$22.00
doi:10.1016/j.jpag.2005.03.003
168
Cox et al: Youth Preferences in Teen Services
the perceptions and preferences of parenting and pregnant teens cared for in a teen-tot program and an affiliated prenatal program concerning services they have
received or would ideally like to receive from the
program. Suggestions were elicited early in the development of a new program to help shape the services
offered to young parents.
(Table 1). Only one participant was multiparous. Prenatal program staff recruited pregnant teens from
within their teen-focused prenatal clinic. Teen-tot
clinic staff recruited parenting teens to participate in
the focus groups. Participants were telephoned and
approached during clinic visits. Each subject read, understood, and signed an informed consent that had
been approved by Children’s Hospital Boston’s Institutional Review Board.
Methods
Setting
The focus groups were conducted in two collaborating
hospital-based comprehensive programs, one for prenatal teens and the other for parenting teens. At the
prenatal program, nurse midwives and a social worker
provide comprehensive psycho-social and obstetrical
care that encourages compliance with prenatal care,
good nutrition, STD/HIV prevention, and breastfeeding. The social worker connects teens with community
services, including housing, education, and home visiting services.
At birth, mother and baby are visited in hospital by
a pediatric nurse practitioner who identifies concerns
and provides well-baby care education. She coordinates the transition of care to a teen-tot program where
a multidisciplinary team provides comprehensive,
family-centered health care to both young parents and
their children. Within the first week, the teen mother
meets her primary health care team of nurse, social
worker, and medical provider who follow her for the
first three years of her child’s life. The social worker
begins an assessment of her history, family situation,
school situation, relationship to baby’s father, and outstanding needs and provides ongoing support. The
nurse provides individual health education and careful
follow-up of any medical issues of mother or child.
The father of the child, if present, is offered a range
of services as well.
A social worker and nurse practitioner team conducts both prenatal and postnatal psycho-educational
groups. These groups using an array of interactive
activities, foster compassionate, empathetic, and appropriate relationships among teens participating in
the parenting groups.14,15 Group topics are structured to
fit the appropriate educational needs of the teens either
prenatal or parenting and are based on the Nurturing
Curriculum.16,17
Population
Teen mothers were eligible to participate in the focus
groups if they were (1) less than 19 years old at delivery, (2) attended the prenatal program and/or the teentot program, and (3) spoke English. The ethnic and
socioeconomic status of the teens that participated in
the focus groups was reflective of the clinic populations
Data Collection
Four focus groups (two prenatal and two parenting)
were conducted within a 6-month span between December of 2001 and May of 2002. A trained facilitator
used a structured moderator’s guide that was developed
from conceptualization by the multidisciplinary service delivery team (made up of nurses, social workers,
and physicians). The teens were given a culturally
sensitive, hypothetical case scenario describing a 16year-old teen carrying a child to term or parenting a
healthy newborn baby, depending on the type of group
(Table 2). The facilitator posed questions about services the hypothetical teen parent, the child, and others
involved would need in the described circumstances.
The audiotapes from three of the focus groups were
transcribed verbatim without names or identifiers. A
separate recorder took detailed notes as well to capture
verbal and nonverbal communications. From the fourth
group, only detailed notes were available, due to a
tape recorder malfunction. Demographic data were
collected from an intake questionnaire administered at
the time the teens initiated services. Participants were
provided cab rides to and from the hospital, $10 reimbursement, childcare during group sessions, and nutritious snacks.
Data Analysis
Three authors (LB, SM, ERW) independently manually coded the transcription text for underlying themes.
Initially, descriptive open coding was used. As
themes emerged, coding strategies were modified and
refined using grounded theory techniques.18–20 Interpretive coding was verified by comparing back to focus
group transcript. Main themes that linked the
Table 1. Age and Race of Participants (n ⫽ 16)
Age
Average Age
Age Range
Race
African American
Latina
Haitian
Prenatal (n ⫽ 6)
Parenting (n ⫽ 10)
18.0 years
16–20 years
18.9 years
18–21 years
5
1
0
8
1
1
Cox et al: Youth Preferences in Teen Services
169
Table 2. Focus Group Questions
Prenatal Group Questions
Case scenario: Juanita is a 16-year-old girl who is six months pregnant for the first time. She has had a healthy pregnancy so far. She is
attending school currently. What will help her do the best for herself, the pregnancy and her family?
What will be helpful in terms of health services?
Who else needs services?
What other services would be helpful to Juanita like food, money, jobs, housing, and breastfeeding?
What would you like or dislike about parenting groups? What would you do?
Postnatal Group Questions
Case scenario: Juanita is a 16-year-old girl who has a healthy, newborn baby. She would like to go back to school. The father of the baby
visits often. What will help Juanita do the best for herself, her baby, and her family?
What kind of health services is necessary for her and her baby?
What about services besides health care can a hospital offer Juanita, like food, housing, money, school, and jobs?
If you could have one wish, for you, your baby and your family, what would it be?
What would you like or dislike about parenting groups? What would you do?
categories were then developed in the final analyses,
and are presented here with a representative range of
youth comments.
Results
A total of 16 teens participated in the focus groups,
with ten parenting teens and six prenatal teens (Table 1).
Participants’ ethnic backgrounds consisted of African
American, Latina, and Haitian. The young women’s
ages ranged between 16 and 21 years. Participants were
low-income, indicated by eligibility for Medicaid. All
prenatal teens were in the second or third trimester.
Of the parenting teens attending focus groups, 30%
were parents of more than one child.
Perceptions of Medical Health Care
As the focus group discussion progressed, it became
clear that the teens valued comprehensive medical services that were hospital based. Prenatal and postnatal
groups commonly desired comprehensive health services in a hospital setting. Their greatest expectation
from a hospital was primary health care for themselves
and their children. Teens felt most cared for and comfortable if they saw the same provider at each visit.
The two groups’ secondary preferences did differ,
as prenatal teens desired services that fostered exercise
and socialization around their pregnancy. One prenatal
teen indicated the importance of exercise for delivery:
“A lot of people don’t get the exercise they are supposed to. If you do a lot of walking, your pelvic area
is more loose and when you get ready to push your
baby out, it’s not that painful.” Another said, “They
should just have a building where there are only pregnant women’s programs. All they (doctors) tell you is
do a lot of exercises. What type of exercise? You don’t
know really what to do because you have never been
to a program like that.” Another identified the positive
support that exercise could provide:“Being pregnant
you get depressed. Your body is all out of shape. Your
chest is huge. So by you doing something that makes
you feel good about yourself, it lifts your self esteem
a lot.”
When asked the purpose of their prenatal care visits,
multiple prenatal teens mentioned basic reproductive
information and prenatal medical health: “See how far
along they are and they need their prenatal pills and
their monthly check-ups.” Another felt that education
about fetal development was especially important:
“Where the baby comes from. How it all gets started
and the sperm traveling to the egg.”
All parenting teens desired high quality care for
their children. They greatly valued the direct referral
services in a hospital and access to specialists within
the hospital if there was a complication regarding their
child’s health: “I want nothing but the best for my
son.” Another mother said, “It’s better in a hospital.
Everything you need is right here. I didn’t have to go
to another hospital if my daughter is sick.”
Parenting teens with older children receiving longer
term care spoke openly regarding their desire for consistent doctors accessible for regular health care visits
for themselves and especially for their children. The
parenting teens felt exasperated when providers to
whom they were attached left the program. Several
teens emphasized the need for: “A doctor who doesn’t
leave.” Another complained, “Every time I came in
they just gave me the first doctor they had in.” Because
prenatal teens obtain a shorter duration of services,
there were fewer concerns about staff turnover.
A few parenting teens were suspicious of private
doctors in private practices or of home visiting professionals. The teens placed greater confidence in the
hospital establishment more than an independent practice: “Private doctors are not as good as a clinic. They
just want to get paid and bounce.” Another said, “Who
are they to call themselves private doctors, you know?
They have a diploma, whatever. But I am not sure what
they do.”
170
Cox et al: Youth Preferences in Teen Services
Birth Control
Prenatal and parenting teens collectively wanted doctors to be honest and detailed in their descriptions of
birth control options. The teens wanted to know all
options available along with a doctor’s recommendation: “It’s nice to know all your different options and
things that you can use.” Ultimately, they desired to
make their own choice: “My doctor can say, ‘Okay, I
think the pill would be best for you. But just in case, if
you or your mom want to look over anything else,
here’s everything and every side effect.”
Sexually Transmitted Diseases
Prenatal teens wanted doctors to be upfront about potential sexually transmitted diseases that could impact
their child. One teen shared: “I think they (the doctor)
should just offer the test to you, instead of waiting for
you to be like, ‘Do you want to check me for syphilis?’
Be more informative that when they do the pap smear
(pelvic exam), it only shows for gonorrhea, chlamydia
and cervical cancer. It’s information that you need.”
Compared to prenatal teens, parenting teens were not
as concerned about sexually transmitted diseases.
Prenatal teens also felt it was difficult to find out
personal information regarding their health and their
pregnancy. “Not just pregnancy, but about sex, and
health, like all different diseases. Or sometimes you
might not want to be at the library if it’s packed. It’s
so hard to find privacy. Sometimes it’s hard to read at
your house because your mom might see. She’ll trip
out.” Multiple prenatal teens thought pamphlets in
doctors’ offices and in clinic rooms would be a private
way to gather information about their bodies and pregnancies without disclosing personal information to
their family and friends.
Social Services Including Mental Health Care
Prenatal teens did not express as much emotional stress
as did parenting teens. One prenatal teen expressed
the need for support during the initial stages of acceptance of her pregnancy as well as other family members’ acceptance of the pregnancy. The prenatal teens
would have liked the hospital to foster relationships
with other pregnant teens as the prenatal groups did
or other venues such as exercise groups in preparation
for labor and delivery as well as keeping fit and healthy
for their unborn child.
Many prenatal teens felt social services were not
taken full advantage of due to suspicion of the outcome
of disclosure of personal issues. One teen honestly
shared: “Maybe they are not truthful about the services
they need because they feel like ‘If I don’t have the
right housing, somebody might try to take my baby
away.’ I used to think like that. My mother had problems with DSS and we got taken away when we
were younger.”
All parenting teens expressed with a strong,
common voice how much they depended on the social
workers they were assigned in the teen-tot model for
emotional support. Numerous teens stated they would
not be as emotionally healthy as they were at the point
of the focus group without the empathetic support of
their social worker to help them cope with their life
situations. Parenting teens expressed that this was
the next most important service needed from a hospital
clinic after basic medical health services: “I am not
in school so everything I get is from YPP (The Young
Parent’s Program). All my support is from my mother
or YPP.” Another confided, “Even though right now
I have a lot of support, [from social worker and others]
sometimes it is too much for me. I cry in a corner.
It’s like, I can’t handle it.” Another pointed out the
importance of mental health support as part of the
medical visit: “How you feel mentally will affect you
physically. But if you workin’ you don’t have time to
go here and there to get help. That’s why I like YPP
‘cause they meet you half way and give you everything
you need.”
Some teens with emotional issues did not go to their
social workers for help but sought help elsewhere but
felt it was difficult to find. Few expressed reliance upon
their own parents and neighbors for social support.
At times, teens felt unsupported emotionally by local
social service agencies, school counselors, and other
case managers. The teens felt these people didn’t help,
were too busy, or were not welcoming. They unanimously agreed that help in the community was not
available for their specific needs.
Assistance with Primary Needs
Both prenatal and parenting teens commonly expressed
a need for help finding housing, jobs, childcare, education, and food. Teens found housing in the urban area to
be a challenge, with long waiting lists and placement
locations far from the urban center from which they
were accustomed. “If you do (get housing), you have
to wait two to five years. Start getting on the waiting
list!” Transportation is a major issue for young parents
when placed outside of the city: “Everything is close,
hospital and everything for my kids. I don’t want to
leave here. I know they are sending everybody to [a
neighboring community]. I can’t be taking bus and
train with my two babies.” Local community housing
services are overwhelmed and are not able to meet
the needs of teen families. Teens would either enjoy
more assistance in this area from the hospitals or are
already taking advantage of their social worker’s
connections within the community to gain housing.
“Can someone help me with housing?”
Both prenatal and parenting teens also felt they
needed support to finish their high school education
Cox et al: Youth Preferences in Teen Services
and seek opportunities for their futures. They felt overwhelmed navigating the educational systems while
pregnant or while caring for their children. Both groups
expressed desires for assistance to continue their education from social workers at the hospitals. “It’s so
hard. You only get minimum wage if you don’t have a
GED. But I want to be home with my babies while they
are young. When they get older, I’ll do something.”
Another stated, “It’s overwhelming. How do I pay
for college?”
In addition, parenting teens would like assistance
with childcare. Some parenting teens had taken advantage of their social worker’s assistance finding
childcare to go back to school. Prenatal teens had not
actively pursued this issue and therefore did not have
comments to make.
Nutrition
Prenatal teens used nutritional services at the hospital
to learn about healthy eating habits. Parenting teens
did not have such services as easily available. Parenting teens wanted a doctor/nutritionist’s help with
weight control. Both groups struggled to make healthy
eating a habit using WIC (Federal nutritional supplemental program). They felt WIC did not offer a diversity of foods or even foods recommended by the
hospital to eat. Both teen groups responded with heated
frustration: “They don’t provide the type of food you
are supposed to eat. They just give you milk.” Teens felt
that WIC should offer a greater range of foods: “They
show you all these types of products you can eat. Why
can’t they provide those to us. If they say, ‘Eat a lot
of fruit.’ Why can’t they provide fruits to us?”
Both groups felt WIC did not offer them enough
food to eat for themselves whether pregnant or
breastfeeding, or their growing children. Teens agreed
that it would be helpful if hospitals provided vouchers
for local markets: “Why couldn’t they just provide stuff
that we like to eat? Like give us a certificate for Stop &
Shop where we could get whatever we need to get.”
They would like more assistance in this area from their
social worker and/or nutritionist.
Services to Others Including Fathers
When the topic of relationships with fathers was introduced, prenatal and parenting teens alike were reluctant to include them in the parenting groups. A few
parenting teens were often outright angry at the mention of their children’s fathers. “Please! The father?
I ain’t worried about him. If he wants to frolic, let him
frolic!” Once the teens calmed down, they did agree
relationships with fathers would be a good topic to
discuss in a parenting group: “Relationships should
be discussed because whatever you do in your house
will affect your child.”
171
When asked if the fathers should receive social
services also, teens mostly agreed. When prompted by
the moderator, teens suggested health care for their
children’s fathers and parenting groups separate from
the mothers but with similar group topics. Most parenting teens did not support regular participation by the
fathers in the same parenting groups: “Well, nothing
happens between parents, no communication, no point
to have parents together.” They felt it would detract
from the teen mothers’ bonding with each other and
with the group leaders. Having fathers present
would not allow the mothers to be as open when asking
personal questions. Teens also felt fathers would feel
the same fear of exposure while participating in groups
with other teen mothers: “I don’t want to be here
with them (fathers).” A few parenting teens strongly
opposed the idea of providing services for fathers:
“A sperm donor don’t mean nothing. To be a father
is different.”
Contrary to the parenting teens’ opinions, prenatal
teens were receptive to the idea of including the fathers
in one of the ten parenting group sessions to discuss
development, child bonding, or relationships. The
prenatal teens also suggested that a support group for
their own caregivers, such as their parents or grandparents, would be helpful as well.
Resources
Prenatal teens were very interested in prenatal and
postnatal resources concerning development and
child rearing. The prenatal teens expressed a desire
for more materials to educate themselves on their pregnancy, health, and child bearing experiences to come.
They requested books such as What to Expect When
You Are Expecting. A prenatal teen suggested that
information should be presented in steps: “And just
like, step-by-step, week-by-week, month-by-month.
Like pictures and charts and stuff like that would be
helpful so that people can see it.” With regard to
resources for parenting such as books, tapes, or videos,
most parenting teens acknowledged the educational
gifts they received were helpful. A few teens admitted
they did not have the resources such as a television,
VCR, or simply time to use the videos.
Prenatal and parenting teens alike expressed frustration with limited resources, education, housing, and
employment. They did not receive much help from
the hospital with these issues and could use more assistance. The financial challenges of teen parenting were
evident in the discussions: “Can you guys help me with
an apartment because I live in a one bedroom apartment. I have two kids. I had to sell my living room
set so I could put my bedroom set there so I could
take the bedroom and split it half for girl and half for
boy.” Another prenatal teen explained: “My mother told
me that I couldn’t get an upgrade on my food stamps
172
Cox et al: Youth Preferences in Teen Services
until after I had the baby. I am like, eating like a horse,
and I only get this much. I am not trying to be greedy,
like selfish, but that goes quick.” They turn to adults for
guidance about management of their meager resources:
“They should have a housing advocate,” or another
said,“…They should kind of let you know what you
should be buying for the baby once it comes.” Others
asked for: “Someone to talk to, you know, an advocate, a
mentor,” or another asked,“…A role model, somebody
that, you know, advice, that can give you advice.”
The parenting teens had generous solutions to creatively extend their resources such as food drives and
second hand stores where they can obtain used clothing
and furniture and donate these items in good condition.
One suggested providing“…housing, furniture, food.
You know how the old people have food drives or
whatever. That would be good, you know what I mean?
Bags of food, all that stuff donated?” Another recommended developing “Like a program after we give
birth and the baby has grown out of all these stuff,
we could bring them to that program….”
Prenatal and Parenting Groups
Both prenatal and parenting focus groups wanted to
discuss development of the fetus or newborn child
and relationships with their child’s father in a psychoeducational group series. In addition, parenting teens
desired group discussions on parenting stresses. All
participants expressed interest in fathers’ education in
the area of development and bonding with their children. Teens felt it was a good idea for fathers to become
educated in a child’s development and participate in
one session on that topic. Prenatal teens were more
eager to educate and incorporate their child’s father
into the services: “He is a good father but he needs
parenting classes too. Not just me. He needs to learn
what he has to do with an infant.” Another suggested,
“I think we should have a group together so that we
can let them know what we want and what we need.
What we would like them to do to participate with
the newborn.”
Teens did not have a preference of persons with
certain degrees leading parenting groups. They preferred someone who was approachable and knowledgeable: “Someone with experience.” Both prenatal
and parenting teens had very positive views of educational and support groups. Support groups of all kinds
were appealing to focus group participants. “I guess just
being able to meet with other girls that were going
through the same thing as me. That made me want to
come to group. And group, for me, was really a lot of
fun. I really enjoyed group.” Another agreed, “I found
out there was a lot of girls my age, thinking about the
same thing, pregnant, going through different things.
So I don’t feel like I was alone.” Doing something
new and different was important to another, “So it is
something that you can get out of the house and just
smell fresh air and do something instead of laying
around all day and feeling sorry for yourself.”
Teens suggested that reasons to participate in a parenting group included friendship with other teens in
similar situations, interesting topics of discussion,
informed leaders, childcare, and free transportation.
Teens that participated in parenting groups viewed
food and gifts provided at each meeting as less important for attendance then transportation.
Discussion
Through focus groups, teens shared their perceptions
and made recommendations concerning health care
services provided to themselves and their children in a
hospital setting. Topics suggested for health education
included medical health care, STDs, growth and development, and birth control. Recommended services
beyond medical care included social services and
mental health support, and advocacy for healthy nutrition, exercise, housing, school and employment. Other
requested resources were services to fathers, and
grandparents including participation in selected sessions as part of a parenting group curriculum. There
were small but significant differences in services identified by prenatal versus postpartum teens.
A limitation of the study is that focus group participation was based on self-selection. Participants were
recruited from the site where they received care so
that their observations and suggestions reflect their
experience at the program. Teens who did not have a
sense of connectedness or confidentiality within the
clinic may not have wanted to participate. Overall,
the feedback from participants was extremely positive,
perhaps limiting the generalizability of the findings.
In addition, parenting teens were only English speaking and primarily African American from a large urban
area. Their impressions may not reflect the needs of
other populations of parenting teens in other medical
settings or locations of care.
Both groups requested the same providers for clinic
visits. This is consistent with other research studies21
that demonstrate teens’ desire for a close relationship
with one person, be it a medical provider, teacher,
mentor or relative who may greatly influence their decision-making. Parenting teens were more outwardly
vocal about seeing the same provider than prenatal
teens based on their experiences of prior providers
leaving over time, once the teens became attached.
Many urban teens have had many transitions in their
lives, are not in school, and feel isolated.22 Though
unaware of it themselves, they may desire a role model
to consistently encourage them in their child’s and
their own welfare.21
Cox et al: Youth Preferences in Teen Services
Prenatal teens looked to their providers for education about fetal conception and development, pregnancy, health risks, and well-being. As in previous
studies, the prenatal teens’ attitudes also parallel parenting teens’ desire for information regarding birth
control options and STD risks.13,21 Teens preferred a
style of communication that afforded them respect,
education, and control over their bodies and their
decisions.
After medical services, mental health was most
valued by parenting teens. Previous authors suggested
that adolescents feel connected and cared for through
family and social intimacy.23,24 Research also demonstrates social support interventions with at-risk
African American women may increase birth weight
of newborns.25 After birth, teens’ child rearing responsibilities, adulthood expectations, and familial
relationships are interrelated. With multiple demands,
parenting teens remain at high risk for depression.26,27 Parenting teens participating in the focus
groups have learned to successfully reach out to mental
health workers for assistance. Prenatal teens did not
yet have responsibilities of child rearing, thus did
not express need for as much emotional support.
Prenatal and parenting teens both requested help
with primary needs such as housing, education, and
childcare. Prenatal teens responded in anticipation of
future needs. Parenting teens reacted in more emotionally charged ways that conveyed immediate need. Parenting teens were on long housing waiting lists, had
been out of school for many reasons and lengths of
time, experienced poor child care choices, and had
been frustrated with insufficient funds for basic needs
such as healthy nutrition.
Previous research reports that fathers are the second
most frequent child care providers after mothers in low
income, single parent families.28 Father involvement
benefits the child; therefore, teen parents are encouraged to value dual child rearing responsibilities apart
from their romantic relationship.29 As many fathers
did not live with their children and were often found
to struggle in their parenting roles,30 teens were also
asked how to foster strong paternal relationships with
their children. They were also asked how to encourage
fathers in their own medical care.
Parenting teens’ suggestions regarding medical and
mental health care to fathers was mixed. The nature
of each mother’s relationship with the father; and, his
involvement at the time of the focus groups may have
greatly influenced teen’s responses to fathers’ services.
Parenting teens had more time for the relationship with
their child’s father to develop or deteriorate as life’s
demands increased with child rearing and other adult
responsibilities. Thus, these mothers had more to say
about father’s involvement in the child rearing process.
Overall, mothers would have liked their child’s father
173
to know more about child development and participate
in care taking. Prenatal teens felt similarly that they
were more aware of their child and their bodies than
their partners and wanted the fathers to gain similar
knowledge. Though admitting difficulty at times, both
groups valued the fathers’ relationships with their children and felt encouragement in this area to be important
considerations for future program development.5,31
The previous positive experience of participating in
parenting groups was a large incentive for focus group
participation. The teens valued the discussions they
had with group leaders and other teens. Often, parenting teens are isolated,32 come from difficult home
settings,33 and do not have many friendship building
skills. Previous studies have shown that the relationships the teens made in the groups were the most
rewarding part of participation.34,35 Like other studies
about youth development programs,36 teens valued free
transportation to parenting groups as the second most
important benefit of the groups. They were appreciative of food and gifts provided at groups but did not
believe these incentives were essential.
Focus groups proved to be valuable for evaluation
of a comprehensive teen pregnancy and parenting program that included psychoeducational groups. Teens
clearly valued consistent, supportive relationships with
program staff, a one-stop shopping model for medical
care, social services and parenting education. The teens
face formidable obstacles especially after delivery.
Development and refining of services using patient
feedback is critical to meeting the needs of young,
at risk families.
Acknowledgments: We would like to thank the staff and participants of the Young Parents Program, Children’s Hospital Boston
and the Brigham and Women’s Hospital. We would like to thank
Jennifer Valenzuela for teen recruitment and Anna Michonski
for organizing transportation, food, and babysitting for the
groups. This work was supported in part by the Office of Adolescent Pregnancy Programs. Grant # 5AP PA 002033-02-C, and
Leadership Education in Adolescent Health grant # 5T71 MC
00009-11 Maternal and Child Health Bureau (Title 5, Social
Security Act), Health Resources and Services Administration,
Department of Health and Human Services. This work was
presented in part to the Eastern Region for Pediatric Research,
Greenwich, CT, March 19, 2003.
References
1. Ventura SJ, Mosher WD, Curtin SC, et al: Trends in pregnancy rates for the United States, 1976–97: An update.
National Center of Health Statistics. Vital Health Statistics
49(4). Retrieved November 15, 2002, from www.cdc.gov/
nchs/releases/01new/trendprg.htm
2. National Vital Statistic Reports, December 17, 2003, Vol.
52, No. 10
174
Cox et al: Youth Preferences in Teen Services
3. Felice M, Feinstein RA, Fisher MM, et al: Adolescent Pregnancy-current trends and issues. Pediatrics 1998; 103:516
4. Fraser AM, Brockert JE, Ward RH: Association of young
maternal age with adverse reproductive outcomes. N Engl
J Med 1995; 332:1113
5. Cox J: The young parents program. Ambulatory Pediatric
Association Newsletter May 2000; 36:5
6. Barnet B, Duggan AK, Devoe M: Reduced low birth weight
for teenagers receiving prenatal care at a school-based
health center: effect of access and comprehensive care.
J Adolesc Health 2003; 33:349
7. Woods ER, Obeidallah D, Sherry M, et al: The parenting
program for teen mothers: The impact of a nurturing curriculum on adolescent parenting skills and life hassles.
Ambulatory Pediatr 2003; 3:240
8. Cowen P: Effectiveness of a parent education intervention
for at-risk families. J Spec Pediatr Nurs 2001; 6:74
9. Koniak-Griffin D, Anderson N, Brecht M, et al: Public health
nursing care for adolescent mothers: Impact on infant
health and selected maternal outcomes at 1 year postbirth.
J Adolesc Health 2001; 30:44
10. Storber KC, Anderson AJ, Schowalter DS: Group prevention and intervention with pregnant and parenting adolescents. Handbook of Group Intervention for Children and
Families Boston, Allyn and Bacon, 1998, pp 280–306
11. Morgan D: Focus groups as qualitative research. In: Qualitative Research Methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, 1988, pp 9–23
12. Jones S, Hopkins S, Lester C: Teenage sexual health
through the eyes of the teenager: A study using focus
groups. Ambulatory Child Health 1997; 3:3
13. Rosenfeld S, Fox D, Keenan P, et al: Primary care experiences and preferences of urban youth. J Pediatr Health
Care 1996; 10:151
14. DiClemente R, Wingood G, Crosby R, et al: A prospective
study of psychological distress and sexual risk behavior
among black adolescent females. Pediatrics 2001; 108:1
15. Dadds, M. Families, Children, and the Development of
Dysfunction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1995,
pp 31–47
16. Parker S, Greer S, Zuckerman B: Double jeopardy: The
impact of poverty on early child development. Pediatr Clin
North Am 1988; 35:1227
17. Bavolek SJ. Handbook for the Adult-Adolescent Parenting
Inventory. Asheville, NC, Family Development Resources,
Inc., 1984.
18. Glaser BG, Strauss AL: The discovery of grounded theory:
Strategies for qualitative research. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine
de Gruyter, 1967
19. Strauss AL, Corbin JM: Basics of Qualitative Research:
Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Newbury
Park, CA: Sage Publications, 1990
20. Glaser BG: Basics of Grounded Theory Analysis. Mill
Valley, CA, Sociology Press, 1992
21. Rosenfeld S, Keenan P, Fox D, et al: Youth perceptions
of comprehensive adolescent health services through the
Boston HAPPENS program. J Pediatr Health Care 2000;
14:60
22. Ahluwalia S, McGroder S, Zaslow M, et al: Symptoms of
depression among welfare recipients: A concern for two
generations. Child Trends Research Brief. Washington DC:
Child Trends, 2001, December
23. Resnick MD, Harris LJ, Blum RW: The impact of caring
and connectedness on adolescent health and well-being.
J Pediatr Child Health 1993; 29:53
24. Manlove J, Terry-Humen E, Papillo AR, et al: Preventing teen pregnancy, childbearing, and sexually transmitted diseases: What the research shows. Child Trends
Research Brief. Washington, DC: Child Trends, 2002, May
25. Norbeck JS, DeJoseph JF, Smith RT: A randomized trial
of an empirically-derived social support intervention to
prevent low birth weight among African American women.
Soc Sci Med 1996; 43:947
26. Brent D, Birmaher B, Kolko D, et al: Subsyndromal depression in adolescents after a brief psychotherapy trial: Course
and outcome. J Affect Dis 2001; 63:51
27. Resnick MD, Bearman PS, Bauman KE, et al: Protecting
adolescents from harm. JAMA 1997; 278:823
28. National Center on Fathers and Families: The fathering
indicators framework: A tool for quantitative and qualitative analysis. Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania,
Graduate School of Education, 2001, pp 1–63
29. Gavin L, Black M, Minor S, et al: Young disadvantaged
fathers’ involvement with their infants: an ecological perspective. J Adolesc Health 2002; 31:266
30. Jaffee S, Caspi A, Moffitt T: Predicting early fatherhood and
whether young fathers live with their children: Prospective
findings and policy reconsiderations. J Child Psychol
Psychiatr 2001; 42:803
31. Rhein LM, Ginsburg KR, Schwarz DF, et al: Teen father
participation in child rearing: Family perspectives. J Adolesc
Health 1997; 21:244
32. Black M, Papas M, Hussey J, et al: Behavior and development of preschool children born to adolescent mothers:
Risk and 3-generation households. Pediatrics 2002; 109:
573
33. Furstenberg FF, Brooks-Gunn J, Morgan SP: Adolescent
mothers and their children in later life. Fam Plann Perspect
1987; 19:142
34. Cooley M, Unger D: The role of family support in determining developmental outcomes in children of teen mothers.
Child Psychiatr Hum Dev 1997; 21:217
35. Black M, Nitz K: Grandmother co-residence, parenting,
and child development among low income, urban mothers.
J Adolesc Health 1997; 18:218
36. Dignan M, Michielutte R, Sharp P, et al: The role of focus
groups in health education for cervical cancer among minority women. J Community Health 1990; 15:369