G Model
FUSION-6983; No. of Pages 5
ARTICLE IN PRESS
Fusion Engineering and Design xxx (2013) xxx–xxx
Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect
Fusion Engineering and Design
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/fusengdes
Thermal stability of the grain structure in the W-2V and
W-2V-0.5Y2 O3 alloys produced by hot isostatic pressing
J. Martínez a , B. Savoini a , M.A. Monge a , A. Muñoz a,∗ , D.E.J. Armstrong b , R. Pareja a
a
b
Departamento de Física, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, 28911-Leganés Madrid, Spain
Department of Materials, University of Oxford, Park Road, Oxford OX1 3PH, UK
h i g h l i g h t s
•
•
•
•
•
W-2V and ODS W-2V-0.5Y2 O3 alloys have been produced following a powder metallurgy route.
Grain microstructure and microhardness have been studied after isothermal treatments in vacuum.
Both alloys exhibit a duplex grain size population: a submicron-sized grain and a coarse grained one.
The Y2 O3 addition inhibits growth of the coarse grains for T < 1973 K.
The Y2 O3 nanoparticles enhance the microhardness of W-2V-0.5Y2 O3 .
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Received 14 September 2012
Received in revised form 14 May 2013
Accepted 15 May 2013
Available online xxx
Keywords:
W alloys
Oxide dispersion strengthened W alloys
Grain growth
Recovery
Microhardness
a b s t r a c t
W-2V and ODS W-2V-0.5Y2 O3 alloys have been produced following a powder metallurgy route consisting
of mechanical alloying and a subsequent high isostatic pressing HIP at 1573 K. The grain microstructure and microhardness recovery of the alloys have been studied in samples subjected to isothermal
treatments in vacuum in temperature range 1073–1973 K. Both alloys exhibit a duplex grain size distribution consisting of a submicron-sized grain and a coarse-grained population. It has been found that the
Y2 O3 addition inhibits growth of the coarse grains at T < 1973 K. Submicron grain growth, with activation enthalpy of 1.9 and 2.49 eV for W-2V and W-2V-0.5Y2 O3 , respectively, was observed at T ≥ 1573 K.
It resulted that the rate constant for grain growth is 30 times higher in W-2V-0.5Y2 O3 than in W-2V.
The considerable enhancement of the microhardness in the W-2V-0.5Y2 O3 appears to be associated to
dispersion strengthening.
© 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
Tungsten-base alloys are being considered prime candidate
materials for making plasma facing components (PFCs) in the future
fusion reactors, in particular for the construction of a He-cooled
divertor of the future demonstration fusion reactor (DEMO) [1].
A safe and efficient operating condition of these tungsten PFCs
requires new tungsten alloys with enhanced mechanical properties. Solution hardening, dispersion strengthening and grain refinement are the traditional approaches applied for developing these
tungsten alloys [2–5]. It has been found that the Y2 O3 addition can
induce a relative improvement of the mechanical properties of the
W-Ti and W-V alloys, attributable to oxide dispersion strengthening (ODS) and grain refinement induced by the powder metallurgy
processing of these alloys [5,6]. In particular, the transmission
∗ Corresponding author. Tel.: +34 916249413; fax: +34 916248749.
E-mail address: angel.munoz@uc3m.es (A. Muñoz).
electron microcopy (TEM) analyses have already established that
the oxide dispersion and the grain structure of these ODS W-V
alloys have ultrafine characteristics [7]. The mechanical behavior of these alloys at high temperature, therefore, will depend on
the thermal stability of their microstructure. Although the ultrafine grained structure is rather unstable it is expected that the
dispersion of the stable nanoparticles enhances the microstructure stability by inhibiting the recovery, recrystallization and grain
growth. With the aim of evaluating the stability of the ODS nanostructured tungsten alloys, the evolution of the grain microstructure
and microhardness recovery of the powder metallurgy W-2V and
W-2V-0.5 Y2 O3 alloys have been studied in samples subjected to
isothermal treatments in temperature range 1073–1973 K.
2. Experimental
W-2V and ODS W-2V-0.5Y2 O3 (wt%) alloys, hereafter referred
to as W2V and W2V0.5Y, were produced following a powder metallurgy route consisting of mechanical alloying and subsequent high
0920-3796/$ – see front matter © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2013.05.057
Please cite this article in press as: J. Martínez, et al., Thermal stability of the grain structure in the W-2V and W-2V-0.5Y2 O3 alloys produced by
hot isostatic pressing, Fusion Eng. Des. (2013), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2013.05.057
G Model
FUSION-6983; No. of Pages 5
2
ARTICLE IN PRESS
J. Martínez et al. / Fusion Engineering and Design xxx (2013) xxx–xxx
Fig. 1. SEM contrast images showing the structure of duplex grain sizes in (a) W2V y (b) W2V0.5Y. The insets correspond with enlarged ECC images from representatives
areas of the low magnification pictures. The black patches in the images consist of pure V in agreement with the energy dispersive analyses.
Fig. 2. Quantitative analysis of an EBSD pattern for the W2V alloy: (a) reconstructed EBSD image, (b) boundary disorientation mapping, and (c) boundary disorientation
frequency histogram and its theoretical probability density function for an untextured cubic polycrystal. The uncolored patches correspond to grains having sizes below the
resolution of the BSE detection system.
Please cite this article in press as: J. Martínez, et al., Thermal stability of the grain structure in the W-2V and W-2V-0.5Y2 O3 alloys produced by
hot isostatic pressing, Fusion Eng. Des. (2013), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2013.05.057
G Model
FUSION-6983; No. of Pages 5
ARTICLE IN PRESS
J. Martínez et al. / Fusion Engineering and Design xxx (2013) xxx–xxx
3
Fig. 3. Quantitative analysis of an EBSD pattern for the W2V0.5Y alloy: (a) reconstructed EBSD image, (b) boundary disorientation mapping, and (c) boundary disorientation
frequency histogram and its theoretical probability density function for an untextured cubic polycrystal. The uncolored patches correspond to grains having sizes below the
resolution of the BSE detection system.
isostatic pressing (HIP) for 2 h at 1573 K and 200 MPa, following the
procedure described elsewhere [8].
Samples of the alloys were vacuum sealed in respective quartz
ampoules and subjected to isothermal annealing for 1 h at a
given temperature in the range 1073–1973 K, followed by water
quenching. After the suitable surface polishing, the microstructure
of the samples was examined by electron channeling contrast
imaging (ECCI) in a MEB JEOL J8M6500 field emission scanning
electron microscope (SEM). In some cases, electron backscatter
diffraction (EBSD) patterns from the samples were also acquired
using a JSM-6300 scanning electron microscope. The images from
the EBSD patterns were reconstructed using the MTex v3.2.5 data
analysis software [9]. The applied criterion for discriminating
the grain boundaries was a crystallographic misorientation >5◦
between adjacent crystalline domains.
The experimental distributions of the grain sizes in the samples were determined from the ECC images using an improved
approach of the Jhonson–Saltykov stereological method to obtain
the spatial grain size distribution of the 3D microstructure from 2D
dimensional grain size measurements [10]. Vickers microhardness
Fig. 4. Grain microstructure of the W2V0.5Y alloy heat treated at 1573 K. (a) reconstructed EBSD image, (b) ECC image and (c) grain size distributions obtained from
quantitative analyses from the EBSD (striped bars) and ECC (grey bars) images.
Please cite this article in press as: J. Martínez, et al., Thermal stability of the grain structure in the W-2V and W-2V-0.5Y2 O3 alloys produced by
hot isostatic pressing, Fusion Eng. Des. (2013), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2013.05.057
G Model
FUSION-6983; No. of Pages 5
ARTICLE IN PRESS
J. Martínez et al. / Fusion Engineering and Design xxx (2013) xxx–xxx
4
measurements with an applied load of 2.94 N for 20 s were also
performed on each specimen.
3. Results and discussion
3.1. Grain microstructure
3.1.1. As-hipped samples
Fig. 1 shows the microstructure of the W2V and W2V0.5Y alloys
in the as-HIP condition. The HIP treatment appears to produce
V segregation to the powder particles surfaces giving rise to the
formation of V pools, which correspond with the black patches
revealed by SEM electron channeling images like those shown
in Fig. 1. The EDS-SEM analyses of the W2V0.5Y alloys did not
reveal the presence of Y2 O3 indicating that it should be very finely
dispersed. The SEM ECC images shown in Fig. 1 reveal that the
microstructure of both alloys exhibit intermingled grains having
significantly two different sizes, i.e. a duplex grain size distribution comprised of two grain families: one of coarse grains with
sizes larger than 1 m, and a second submicron-sized family. This
duplex grain size structure, along with the fact that the ECC images
from the coarse grains appear not to show contrast differences
attributable to a subgrain substructure, indicate that discontinuous dynamical recrystallization could have occurred during the HIP
consolidation. Also, it should be noted that the volumetric fraction
of submicron-sized grains in the W2V0.5Y alloy is clearly higher
than the fraction of coarse grains, but the opposite occurs in the
W2V alloy.
Figs. 2 and 3 show reconstructed EBSD images for the W2V
and W2V0.5Y alloys, and the respective quantitative analyses of
grain crystallographic orientations along with the corresponding
boundary disorientation distributions. Figs. 2b and 3b show the
maps of the boundary disorientations, and Figs. 2c and 3c the
corresponding frequency histograms along with the Mackenzie
boundary disorientation distribution function, which gives the theoretical probability density of observing a particular boundary
disorientation angle in a cubic polycrystalline with their grains
randomly oriented, i.e. in an untextured cubic material [11]. Here,
the term disorientation corresponds to the lowest angle crystallographically related solution of a misorientation, according to the
definition given in Ref. 12. The reasonable agreement of this theoretical distribution with the experimental histograms of boundary
disorientation confirms the expected absence of any crystallographic texture in these alloys. Nevertheless, a clear deviation of the
experimental frequencies respect to the theoretical ones for disorientations < 15◦ is observed for both alloys. This deviation, being
more significant in the W2V0.5Y alloy, is attributed to the presence
of a high fraction of subgrains, or incidental dislocation boundaries.
A fraction of the low-angle boundaries induced by deformation
during the mechanical alloying may have resulted in unrecovered
subgrains during the HIP consolidation. Also, it appears that the
Y2 O3 addition produces a more recovery resistant alloy by reducing
the dislocation mobility, and therefore the subgrain recovery.
3.1.2. Annealed samples
The ECC images did not reveal any significant effect on the grain
microstructure of both alloys after annealing at T ≤ 1473 K, but a visible change in the size distribution of the submicron grains occurred
after annealing at 1573 K, as the SEM image shown in Fig. 4, and
the size distributions represented in Figs. 5 and 6, reveal. The size
distributions represented in Figs. 5 and 6 were determined from
quantitative analyses performed on ECC images. In order to validate the accuracy of the size distributions determined from the
ECC images, the size distribution for the W2V0.5Y heat treated at
1573 K was compared with the one obtained from reconstructed
Fig. 5. Duplex grain size distribution for the W2V alloy.
EBSD images. The agreement is very satisfactory as the histograms
represented in Fig. 4 reveal considering that the images analyzed
correspond to different zones of the sample.
The initial duplex size distribution for both alloys, which are
characterized by respective bimodal log-normal distributions, is
apparently retained after heat treatments at T ≤ 1473 K without
any perceptible grain growth, as the histograms in Figs. 5 and 6
reveal. The heat treatments at T ≥ 1573 K induced normal growth of
the submicron grains, until the bimodal distributions in both alloys
turn into monomodal at 1973 K. It is worthy of notice that: (1) the
volume fraction of the submicron grains is significantly higher in
W2V0.5Y than in W2V; (2) the volume fraction of the coarse grain
population in W2V0.5Y is lower than the corresponding to submicron grains, ∼30 against 70%; and (3) the micron-sized grains in
W2V0.5Y alloy appear not to coarsen for heat treatments at 1973 K
but they do in W2V. The above results confirm that the oxide dispersion inhibits significantly the grain growth of the coarse grains.
According to the classic approach for the kinetics of normal grain
growth induced by isothermal treatments, the grain size would be
given by [13]:
D2 − Do2 = Ko exp −
Q
kB T
t
(1)
where Do is the initial size, D the size at time t, Q the activation
enthalpy for isothermal growth, T temperature, kB the Boltzmann
constant and Ko a constant. The fits of the experimental data of the
submicron-sized grain distributions to Eq. (1) result in an activation enthalpy Q and rate constant Ko for submicron grain growth of
Please cite this article in press as: J. Martínez, et al., Thermal stability of the grain structure in the W-2V and W-2V-0.5Y2 O3 alloys produced by
hot isostatic pressing, Fusion Eng. Des. (2013), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2013.05.057
G Model
FUSION-6983; No. of Pages 5
ARTICLE IN PRESS
J. Martínez et al. / Fusion Engineering and Design xxx (2013) xxx–xxx
5
Fig. 7. Microhardness recovery (open circles W2V, closed circles W2V0.5Y).
4. Conclusions
The powder metallurgy W2V and W2V0.5 alloys exhibited a
duplex grain size distribution consisting of a submicron-sized grain
population and another coarse-grained. It has been found that the
Y2 O3 addition inhibits growth of the coarse grains at T < 1973 K, at
least. Although the activation enthalpy for submicron grain growth
in W2V0.5Y is significantly higher than in W2V alloy, submicron
grain growth at 1573 K has been observed in both alloys since the
rate constant Ko for W2V0.5Y is higher by a factor of 30. The considerable enhancement of the microhardness in the W2V0.5Y appears
to be associated to dispersion strengthening.
Acknowledgments
Fig. 6. Duplex grain size distribution for the W2V0.5Y alloy.
1.90 ± 0.06 eV (183 ± 6 kJ/mol) and 4.7 × 10−11 m2 /s for W2V, and
2.49 ± 0.11 eV (240 ± 11 kJ/mol) 1.4 × 10−9 and m2 /s for W2V0.5Y.
The activation energy for grain growth is associated to the one for
grain boundary diffusion and should be equal to the corresponding
activation enthalpy in ideal grain growth. The activation enthalpy
values for grain boundary self-diffusion reported for pure tungsten
are in the range 377–468 kJ/mol. Moreover, an activation enthalpy
for grain growth of 211 ± 13 kJ/mol has been reported for pure tungsten with grain size above 10 m [14]. The above implies that the
submicron-sized grain structure in W2V is quite more unstable that
a micron grain structure in pure tungsten. Although the Y2 O3 addition produces a considerable increase of the activation enthalpy
for submicron grain growth, the submicron-sized grain structure is
also unstable at 1573 K. However, Y2 O3 addition inhibits the growth
of the coarse grains at 1973 K.
3.2. Microhardness measurements
Fig. 7 shows the effect of the thermal treatments on the microhardness values. The values for W2V0.5Y are between 2.5 and 3
times higher than the corresponding values for W2V. This enhancement appears to be attributable to dispersion strengthening rather
than to grain hardening. A recovery onset at ∼1573 K is observed
for both alloys in coincidence with the submicron grain growth.
An unambiguous correlation between the mean grain size of these
alloys and the microhardness could not be established.
This work has been supported by the Ministry of Science and
Innovation of Spain (MICINN) under contract ENE2012-39787-C0605, Regional Government of Madrid through the ESTRUMAT-CM
program (MAT-1585), and the European Commission through the
European Fusion Development Agreement (EFDA). The authors
thank to the Microscopy laboratories of the Materials Department
(Oxford University) and CENIM (CSIC) for the Electron Microscopy
measurements.
References
[1] H. Bolt, V. Barabash, W. Krauss, J. Linke, R. Neu, S. Suzuki, et al., ASDEX upgrade
team, Journal of Nuclear Materials 329–333 (2004) 66–73.
[2] M. Schuster, I. Smid, G. Leichtfried, Physica B 234–236 (1997) 1224–1226.
[3] I. Smid, M. Akiba, G. Vieider, L. Plöchl, Journal of Nuclear Materials 258–263
(1998) 160–172.
[4] M.A. Monge, M.A. Auger, T. Leguey, Y. Ortega, L. Bolzono, E. Gordo, et al., Journal
of Nuclear Materials 386–388 (2009) 613–617.
[5] M.V. Aguirre, A. Martín, J.Y. Pastor, J. Llorca, M.A. Monge, R. Pareja, Journal of
Nuclear Materials 404 (2010) 203–209.
[6] A. Muñoz, J.Y. Pastor, R. Pareja, M.A. Monge, B Savoi, T. Leguey, et al., 1st Monitoring Meeting of MAT-W&W Alloys Project, in: EFDA, Garching, Germany,
7–9th February 2012, 2012.
[7] J. Martínez, B. Savoini, M.A. Monge, A. Muñoz, R. Pareja, Fusion Engineering and
Design 86 (2011) 2534–2537.
[8] A. Muñoz, M.A. Monge, B. Savoini, M.E. Rabanal, G. Garcés, R. Pareja, Journal of
Nuclear Materials 417 (2011) 508–511.
[9] F. Bachmann, R. Hielscher, H. Schaeben, Ultramicroscopy 111 (2011)
1720–1733.
[10] Y.H. Xu, H.C. Pitot, Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine 72 (2003)
1–20.
[11] J.K. Mason, C.A. Schuh, Acta Materialia 57 (2009) 4186–4197.
[12] V. Randle, O. Engler, Introduction to Texture Analysis, Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, 2000, pp. XIV.
[13] H. Gleiter, Acta Metallurgica 48 (2000) 1–29.
[14] J. Almanstötter, M. Rühle, International Journal of Refractory Metals and Hard
Materials 15 (1997) 295–300.
Please cite this article in press as: J. Martínez, et al., Thermal stability of the grain structure in the W-2V and W-2V-0.5Y2 O3 alloys produced by
hot isostatic pressing, Fusion Eng. Des. (2013), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2013.05.057