The Effect of Socio-Technical Enablers on Knowledge Sharing in Institutions of Higher Learning: A Propo
Conference
Article 1
Year of Publication: 2011
Fourth Annual International Business
© 2011 by IJCA Journal
Number 1 -
Authors:
Shiva Jahani
Azura Abdullah Effendi
T. Ramayah
{bibtex}ibc043.bib{/bibtex}
Abstract
In this rapidly changing world towards a “Knowledge based economy”, knowledge is
gradually being considered as the most important key driver of this economy. Effective
Knowledge management program that include acquire, use, and leverage within the
organization will help the success of economies in the future. However, most organizations
attempt to focus on systems and tools, rather than on the critical part which is knowledge
sharing within the organization. Knowledge sharing is vital in university because the majority of
the employees are knowledge workers. This is a conceptual study on the enablers of knowledge
1/6
The Effect of Socio-Technical Enablers on Knowledge Sharing in Institutions of Higher Learning: A Propos
sharing based on the soci- technical theory with a view to suggest how the theory can be
applied to improve higher education system. The role of knowledge delivery personnel has to be
emphasized in addition to technology. Socio-technical approach are studied which recognize
interaction between social and technologies. This paper studies to identify the major problems
that hinder KS pract.ice focusing on leadership role in higher education to develop collaborative
work towards a goal to help overcome problems using technical aspects, involving people and
processes.
Reference
- Alavi, M. and Leidner, D. E. (2001). Knowledge and knowledge Management systems:
Conceptual foundations and research issues. MIS Quarterly, 25(1), 107-136.
- Alavi, M. and Leidner, D. E. (1999). Knowledge management systems: issues, challenges,
benefits. Communications of AIS, 1(7), 2-41.
- Allee, V. (2000). Knowledge networks and communities of practice. OD Practitioner:
Journal of the organizational Development Network, 32(4).Retrieved 14 February 2005
http://www.odnetwork.org/odponline/vol32n4/knowledgenets.html.
- Barth, S. (2000). KM horror stories, Knowledge Management, 3(10), 36-40.
- Bartol, K. and Srivastava, A.(2002). Encouraging Knowledge Sharing: The Role of
Organizational Reward Systems. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 19(1), 64-77.
- Bass, B. (1985). Leadership and Performance Beyond Expectations. New York: The Free
Press.
- Bass, B. M. and Avolio, B. J.(1993). Transformational leadership: a response to critiques,
in Chemers, M. M, Ayman, R (Eds), Leadership Theory and Research: Perspectives and
Directions, Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
- Bass, B. M. and Avolio, B. J.(1994). Improving Organizational Effectiveness through
Transformational Leadership. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Bates, A. W. (2000). Managing Technological Change. Strategies for college and
university leaders. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
- Bernbom, G. (Ed.). (2001). Information Alchemy: The Art and Science of Knowledge
Management. Educause Leadership Series Number 3, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
- Berson, Y., Nemanich, L.A., Waldman, D.A., Galvin, B. M. and Keller, R. T. (2006).
Leadership and organizational learning: a multiple levels perspective.The Leadership Quarterly,
17(6), 577-94.
- Bhatt, G.(2001). Knowledge management in organizations: Examining the interactions
between technologies, techniques, and people.Journal of Knowledge Management, 5(1), 68-75.
- Bock, G. W. and Kim, Y. (2002). Breaking myths of rewards: An exploratory study of
attitudes about Knowledge sharing. Information Resources Management Journal, 15(2), 14-21.
Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. New York: Harper & Row, New York, NY.
- Chen, L. Y. and Barnes, F. B. (2006). Leadership behaviors and knowledge sharing in
professional service firms engaged in strategic alliances. The Journal of Applied Management
and Entrepreneurship, 11(2), 51 – 69.
2/6
The Effect of Socio-Technical Enablers on Knowledge Sharing in Institutions of Higher Learning: A Propo
- Choi, B. and Lee, H. (2003). An empirical investigation of KM styles and their effect on
corporate performance. Information & Management, 40(5), 403-17.
- Conger, J. A. and Kanungo, R.N. (1998). Charismatic Leadership in Organizations.
Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage Publications.
- Cummings, J. N. (2004). Work groups, structural diversity and knowledge sharing in a
global organization. Management Science, 50(3), 352-364.
- Davenport, T. (1998). Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage What They Know.
Harvard Business School Press.
- Davenport, T. H. and Prusak, L. (2000). Work Knowledge: How Organizations Manage
What They Know. Harvard Business School Press, Boston: MA.
- Davenport, T. H. (1994). Saving IT’s soul: human-centered information management.
Harvard Business Review, 72(2), 119-31.
- Den Hartog, D. N., Van Muijen, J. J. and Koopman, P. L. (1997). Transactional versus
transformational leadership: an analysis of the MLQ. Journal of Occupational and
Organizational Psychology, 70(1),19–29.
- Drucker, P. F. (1993). Post- capitalist society. Butterworth Heinemann:Oxford.
- Dyer, J. and Nobeoka, K.(2000). Creating and managing a high performance
knowledge-sharing network: the Toyota Case. Strategic Management Journal, 21(3), 345-367
- Fahey, L. and Prusak, L. (1998). The eleven deadliest sins of knowledge management.
California Management Review, 40, 265-76.
- Graetz, F. (2000). Strategic change leadership. Management Decision, 38(8), 550-64.
- Gray, P. (2001). The impact of knowledge repositories on power and control in the
workplace. Information technology & people , 14(4), 364-384.
- Gupta, A. and Govindarajan, V. (2000). Knowledge management's social dimension:
Lessons from Nucor Steel. Sloan Management Review, fall, 71-80.
- Hall, H. (2001). Input-friendliness: motivating knowledge sharing across intranets. Journal
of Information Science, 27(3), 139-46.
- Hoefling, T. (2001). Working virtually: Managing people for successful virtual teams and
organizations. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing.
- Inkpen, A. C. (2000). Learning through joint ventures: a framework of knowledge
acquisition. Journal of Management Studies, 37(7), 1019–1043.
- Ipe, M. (2003). Knowledge Sharing in Organizations: A Conceptual Framework. Human
Resource Development review, 2(4), 337-359
- Karlsen, J. T. and Gottschalk, P. (2004). Factors Affecting Knowledge Transfer in IT
Projects. Engineering Management Journal, 16(1), 3-10.
- Kakabadse, A. and Kakabadse N. (1999). Essence of Leadership. International Thomson
Business Press, London.
- Kidwell, J. J., Vander, K. M. and Johnson, S. L. (2000). Applying corporate knowledge
management practices in higher education. Educause Quarterly, 23(4), 28-33.
- Kolekofski, K. E., & Heminger, A. R. (2003). Beliefs and attitudes affecting intentions to
share information in an organizational setting. Information & Management, 40(6), 521-532.
- Kyriakidou, O. (2004). Developing a knowledge sharing culture. Management Services,
48(6), 22-23.
- Lin, H.-F. and Lee, G. G. (2004). Perception of senior managers toward knowledge
sharing behavior. Management Decision, 42(1), 108-125.
- Ling, C. W., Sandhu, M. S. and Jain, K. K. (2009). Knowledge sharing in an American
3/6
The Effect of Socio-Technical Enablers on Knowledge Sharing in Institutions of Higher Learning: A Propos
multinational company based in Malaysia. Journal of Workplace Learning, 21(2), 125-142.
- McDermott, R. and O.Dell, C. (2001). Overcoming cultural barriers to sharing knowledge.
Journal of Knowledge Management, 5(1), 76 - 85.
- Matzler, K., Rier, M., Hinterhuber, H.H., Renzl, B. and Stadler, C. (2005). Methods and
concepts in management: significance, satisfaction and suggestions for further research:
perspectives from Germany, Austria and Switzerland. Strategic Change, 14(1), 1-13.
- Nonaka, I. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization
Science, 5(1), 14-37
- Nonaka, I. T. (1995). The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies
Create the Dynamics of Innovation. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
- Norris, D. M., Mason, J., Robson, R., Lefrere, P. and Collier, G. (2003). A revolution in
knowledge sharing. Educause Review, 38(5), 14-26.
- O’Dell, C., Wiig, K. and Odem, P. (1999). Benchmarking univeils emerging knowledge
management strategies. Benchmarking : An International review, 6(3), 202- 11.
- Pan, S. and Scarbrough, L. (1998). A socio-technical view of knowledge sharing at
Buckman Laboratories. Journal of Knowledge Management, 2(1), 55–66.
- Pauline, D. and Mason, D. (2002). New Zealand Knowledge Management Survey:
Barriers and Drivers, Available online at: http://
nzkm.sites.totallydigital.co.nz/assets/survey.pdf
- Petrides, A.L. and Nodine, R.T. (2003). Knowledge management in education: defining
the landscape.The institution for the study of knowledge management in education Press, USA.
- Polanyi, M. (1997). The tacit dimension. London, UK: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
- Reid, I. C. (2000). The web knowledge management and universities Paper, The Sixth
Australian World Wide Web Conference, Cairns, Qld Australia.
- Reid, F. (2003). Creating a knowledge-sharing culture among diverse business units.
Employment Relations Today, 30(3), 43-49.
- Ribiere, V. M. and Sitar, A. (2003). Critical role of leadership in nurturing knowledge –
supporting culture. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 1(1), 39-48 Riege, A.
(2005). Three dozen knowledge sharing barriers managers must consider. Journal of
Knowledge Management, 9(3), 18-35.
- Ruggles, R. (1998). The state of the nation: knowledge management in practice, California
Management Review, 40(3), 80-9.
- Scott, E. B. (2003). The role of transformational and transactional leadership in creating,
sharing and exploiting organizational knowledge. Journal of leadership & Organizational
Studies, 9(4), 32-44
- Southon, F. C. G., Todd, R. J. and Seneque, M. (2002). Knowledge management in three
organizations: An exploratory study. Journal of the American Society for Information Science
and Technology, 53(12), 1047-1059.
- Srivastava, A. and Bartol, K. M. (2006). Empowering leadership in management teams:
Effects on knowledge sharing, efficacy, and performance. Academy of Management Journal,
49(6), 1239-1251.
- Sveiby, K. E. (1997). The New Organizational Wealth: Managing & Measuring KnowledgeBased Assets. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
- Szulanski, G. (1996). Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best
practice within the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17, Winter Special Issue, 27-43.
4/6
The Effect of Socio-Technical Enablers on Knowledge Sharing in Institutions of Higher Learning: A Propo
- Torrisi, S. (1998). Industrial organization and innovation: An international study of the
software industry. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
- Yukl, G. (1989). Managerial Leadership. A Review of theory and research, 15(2), 251-289.
- Yukl, G. (2006). Leadership in organizations, Sixth edition. Upper Saddle River, NJ:
PrenticeHall.
- Wah, L. (2000). Making knowledge stick. In: J.W. Cortada and J.A. Woods, Editors, The
knowledge management yearbook 2000–2001, Butterworth-Heinemann, Woburn, MA (2000),
145–156.
- Zhao, C., Gutl. C. and Chang, E. (2008). How modern technology in knowledge
management can support higher education institutions in modern learning settings.ICL
Conference. Sep, 24-26.
Computer Science
Key words
sharing
leadership
Index Terms
Knowledge Management (KM)
Ubiquitous Computing
knowledge
academics
knowledge workers
socio-technical system
5/6
The Effect of Socio-Technical Enablers on Knowledge Sharing in Institutions of Higher Learning: A Propos
6/6