4
Endoscopes
Arianna Massella and Paolo Bocus
4.1
Endoscopes
Since its introduction more than 40 years ago,
endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) has changed the treatment of biliopancreatic diseases. At the beginning, it was
a diagnostic procedure, but over time due to the
development of noninvasive imaging, it evolved
to a therapeutic procedure. Such an evolution has
required developments in technology and training to bring us to present ERCP.
Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) was developed
in the early 80s to overcome mainly difficulties
by the radiological techniques of the time in visualizing the pancreas, located in retroperitoneal
space and often covered by air. The first scope
commercially available from 1986 was a fiberoptic radial device. In the early 1990s with the
advent of the curved, linear-array echoendoscope
began the era of interventional EUS (EUS-FNA).
Over the years, many improvements have been
achieved such as switchable frequencies, to allow
more detailed visualization of GI wall layers and
the conversion from a mechanical to a fully electronic instrument. This allowed to develop new
A. Massella · P. Bocus (*)
IRCCS “Sacro Cuore—Don Calabria”,
Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico,
Ospedale Classificato e Presidio Ospedaliero
Accreditato—Regione Veneto, Negrar di Valpolicella,
Verona, Italy
functions such as Doppler, elastosonography, and
the contrast enhanced echoendoscopy.
4.2
Duodenoscopes
The standard endoscope for ERCP is the sideviewing duodenoscope, equipped with a tip with
four-way angulation capability, a side-positioned
air/water nozzle, an instrument channel, and
a forceps elevator adjacent to the instrument
channel outlet that allows fine linear instrument
position changes facilitating cannulation and
placement of various devices.
Instrument channel diameter ranges from 2.2
to 5.5 mm. Duodenoscopes with 4.2 mm internal
channel allowing to place biliary endoprostheses
(10–11.5 Fr circumference) are the most used.
Pediatric duodenoscopes with a 2.2 mm channel are
available for examination in infants, while largest
instrument channels (>5 mm) are found in so-called
“mother/baby” scope system usedfor choledochoscopy and pancreatoscopy. However this system is
difficult to manipulate and is now rarely used [1].
In certain situations where a traditional duodenoscope is not suitable (e.g., in patients with
a Billroth II or a Roux-en-Y reconstruction), a
forward-viewing endoscope may be tried instead
[2]. Conventional endoscopes however provide a
limited visualization of the ampullary region and
are limited with respect to control of accessories
during cannulation due to the absence of elevator.
© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020
M. Mutignani et al. (eds.), Endotherapy in Biliopancreatic Diseases: ERCP Meets EUS,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42569-2_4
27
28
A. Massella and P. Bocus
In recent years, infections due to multidrugresistant organisms (MDROs) have become a
concern in health care, including in gastrointestinal endoscopy. Cases and serial outbreaks
of MDROs infections associated with ERCP
have been published from different countries
from 2010 [3]. All the processes of cleaning,
disinfection, and sterilization of duodenoscopes have been analyzed featuring different
issues [4].
Major manufacturers developed tools to
prevent infections such as detachable disposable distal cap. Post-procedure reprocessing is
performed by detaching the disposable distal
cap and cleaning and disinfecting the tip of the
scope [5]. In addition, new adaptors that can
be attached to the tip of the duodenoscope to
inject a cleaning solution have been developed
(Figs. 4.1, 4.2, and 4.3).
Four
major
manufacturers,
Olympus
(Olympus America, Center Valley, Pa), Pentax
(Pentax of America, Montvale, NJ), Fujifilm
endoscopy (Fujinon, Wayne, NJ), and Karl Storz
Se & Co. (Tuttlingen, Germany—Fig. 4.4), produce duodenoscopes, and these are their major
characteristics (Table 4.1).
4.3
Echoendoscopes
Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) combines
endoscopy and intraluminal ultrasonography.
The new electronic instruments are connected
with processors with considerable digital capabilities. Therefore, the technical peculiarities
of the endoscopes of the same brand (i.e., NBI,
FICE, Hi-scan) are contemporary available with
the technical features of the most modern ultrasounds equipment (Doppler, power Doppler, color
Doppler, tissue harmonic echo [THE], contrast
harmonic EUS [CH-EUS], elastography, etc.).
The instruments for endoscopic ultrasound
evaluation can be divided in:
– radial echoendoscopes
purposes,
for
diagnostic
– linear echoendoscopes for diagnostic and
interventional purposes.
Radial echoendoscopes consist of electronic
radial-array transducers that orient the individual piezoelectric elements around the distal tip
in a 360° radial array, producing an image in a
plane perpendicular to the long axis of the echoendoscope that is very similar to the images provided by computed tomography. Radial-array
echoendoscopes are used only for diagnostic
EUS examinations because tissue sampling and
therapeutic interventions are not possible due
to the lack of visualization of needle or other
devices track.
Linear echoendoscopes provide a plane of
imaging parallel to the long axis of the scope with
an image format that is similar to that obtained
with transabdominal ultrasonography; only this
type of probe allows real-time visualization of
needles and other accessories introduced through
the operative channel of the echoendoscope
[6–8]. It allows to perform fine-needle aspiration or biopsy (FNA or FNAB), stent delivering,
drainage, and locoregional treatments (i.e., celiac
plexus block and neurolysis).
Three major manufacturers (Olympus,
Pentax, Fujifilm) produce echoendoscopes. Their
characteristics are summarized in the tables
below (Figs. 4.5, 4.6, and 4.7, Tables 4.2 and 4.3).
4.4
EUS Processors
EUS processors consist of two parts: the first for
the endoscopic view and the second one for the
ultrasound view. These devices allow to capture,
manipulate, and store EUS images. These platforms may be exclusively dedicated to EUS or
may be compatible with transabdominal probes.
Traditionally, a strict partnership has been created between the echoendoscope companies and
well-known ultrasound processors manufacturers: Pentax radial and linear scopes are driven by
a Hitachi platform, whereas Olympus echoendoscopes run from Aloka systems.
4
Endoscopes
Table 4.1 Duodenoscopes
Distal end
Insertion tube outer
outer diameter diameter
(mm)
(mm)
Channel
inner
diameter
Working
length
(mm)
11.3
13.7
4.2
1240
11.3
13.5
4.2
1240
11.5
13.1
4.2
1250
11.5
13.1
4.2
1250
11.6
13
4.2
1250
Pentax
ED34-i10T2
11.6
13.6
4.2
1250
Storz
Silverscope
12.6
12.6
4.2
1260
Olympus
TJF-Q180V
Olympus
TJF-Q190V
Fujinon
ED-530XT
Fujinon
ED-530XT8
Pentax
ED34-i10T
Single
use
distal tip Remarks
Depth of
field
Electronic
(mm)
Angulation range
capabilities
Up Down Right Left
5–60
120° 90°
110° 90° NBI
No
V-System
5–60
120° 90°
110° 90° NBI
Yes
OT, HFT, V-System
4–60
130° 90°
110° 90° FICE
No
4–60
130° 90°
110° 90° FICE
Yes
4–60
120° 90°
105° 90° HISCAN
No
100°/10°
retro°
4–60
120° 90°
105° 90° HISCAN
Yes
140°
2–60
120° 90°
110° 90° /
No
Field of
view
100°/5°
retro
100°/15°
retro
100°/8°
retro
100°/8°
retro
100°/10°
retro
HD+, detachable cap,
Pentax “CleanCapsystem” (OE-A55)
HD+, DEC,
Disposable Elevator
Cap (OE-A63)
OT One-Touch Connector, FHT High-Force Transmission, HD+ High Definition New Chip, DEC Allows simplified reprocessing and increased cleaning capability, Pentax
“CleanCap-system” Detachable distal end cap for a safe and quick mechanical cleaning of air and water channels
29
30
Table 4.2 Radial echoendoscopes
Radial
Olympus
GF-UE160-AL5
Pentax
EG-3670URK
Fujinon
EG-580UR
Distal
end
Insertion
tube (mm) (mm)
11.8
Working
length
(mm)
1250
Channel
inner
diameter
(mm)
2.2
12.1
10.3
1250
2.4
Direction of
viewing
field
Forward
oblique
Forward
11.5
11.4
1250
2.8
Forward
Ultrasound
field of view
360°
Depth Frequency
of field (MHz)
3–100 5/6/7.5/10/12
CHEDoppler EUS
Yes
Yes
360°
4–100
5–10
Yes
Yes
System
Elastography compatibility
Yes
Hitachi-Aloka
Olympus
Yes
Hitachi-Aloka
360°
3–100
5/7.5/10/12
Yes
No
No
Fuji
A. Massella and P. Bocus
4
Endoscopes
Table 4.3 Linear echoendoscopes
Distal
end
Insertion
tube (mm) (mm)
12.6
14.6
Working
length
(mm)
1250
Channel
inner
diameter
(mm)
3.7
Olympus
TGF-UC180J
Pentax
EG-3270UK
12.6
14.6
1245
3.7
10.8
12
1250
2.8
Pentax
EG-3870UTK
12.8
14.3
1250
3.8
Fujinon
EG-580UT
12.4
13.9
1250
3.8
Linear
Olympus
GF-UCT180
Direction of
viewing
field
Forward
oblique
(55°)
Forward
Forward
oblique
(50°)
Forward
oblique
(50°)
Forward
oblique
(40°)
Ultrasound
field of view
180°
Depth of
field
Frequency
(mm)
(MHz)
3–100
5/6/7.5/10/12
CHEDoppler EUS
Yes
Yes
System
Elastography compatibility
Yes
Hitachi-Aloka
Olympus
90°
3–100
5/6/7.5/10/12
Yes
Yes
Yes
180°
5–100
5–10
Yes
Yes
Yes
Hitachi-Aloka
Olympus
Hitachi-Aloka
180°
5–100
5–10
Yes
Yes
Yes
Hitachi-Aloka
180°
3–100
5/7.5/10/12
Yes
No
No
Fuji
31
32
4.5
A. Massella and P. Bocus
ERCP Instruments
Fig. 4.1 Olympus TJF-Q190V. The single-use distal
cover allows better access for reprocessing accessories
during manual cleaning. The cover is transparent and is
destroyed during removal, preventing unintended reuse.
The new flushing adapter reduces the number of required
flushing steps and ensures controlled distribution of detergent and disinfectant solution to the distal tip of the endoscope during manual reprocessing
Fig. 4.2 Pentax ED34-i10T2. This video duodenoscope
combines a sterile disposable elevator cap (DECTM) for
single-patient use and simple disposal that advances
cleaning capability of the duodenoscope. This is to help
reduce risk of cross contamination
4
Endoscopes
33
Tit-up mechanism part
Fig. 4.3 Fujinon ED-530XT8. It is equipped with a disposable distal end cap that enables brushing of all channels and helps to improve the hygienic environment. A
covered tilt-up mechanism of the forceps elevator maintains the elevator wire clean without any additional clearing procedure
Fig. 4.4 Karl Storz 13885PKSK/NKSK duodenoscope. Removable and autoclavable Albarran module
34
4.6
a
A. Massella and P. Bocus
EUS Instruments
b
Fig. 4.5 The Olympus GF-UCT180 (a) delivers highquality ultrasound images with greater B-mode imaging
depth, offering safe control with a round transducer design
and a short rigid distal end. Olympus GF-UE160-AL5 (b)
radial ultrasound endoscope is a 360° radial-array scan-
a
Fig. 4.6 Pentax EG-3870UTK (a) ultrasound video
endoscope utilizes a curved, linear-array ultrasound transducer that provides a large 120° field of view. The
EG-3670URK (b) features a 360°, electronic, radial-array
ultrasound transducer, which generates high-resolution
c
ning endoscope. Olympus TGF-UC180J (c) linear ultrasound endoscope. The forward-viewing ultrasound
gastrovideoscope pioneers new opportunities in endoscopic ultrasound-guided treatment
b
ultrasound images. Both are supported by various imaging modalities such as Hitachi Real-Time Tissue
Elastography (HI-RTE) and Doppler function for a more
accurate localization and targeting of lesions
4
Endoscopes
35
a
Fig. 4.7 Fujifilm EG-580UT (a) ultrasound endoscope
with forceps elevator assist which enables convex scanning, developed for therapeutic interventions. With a
working channel of 3.8 mm and equipped with an Albarran
lever, it is the former scope, which also allows passage of
therapeutic devices and needle position guide on the ultrasound image. Fujifilm EG-580 UR (b) with the thin outer
b
diameter of 11.4 mm, the unique 190° bending, and the
brilliant Super CCD image quality; the new EG-580UR
allows to carry out endoscopic ultrasound examinations
almost as simply as a traditional endoscopic examination.
The 2.8 mm working channel enables a good suction ability and the use of a standard-size biopsy forceps. The electronic 360° radial scan ensures a reliable panoramic view
References
1. Baillie J, Byrne MF. ERCP preparation, positioning, and instrumentation. Tech Gastrointest Endosc.
2003;5(1):3–10.
2. Yao W, Huang Y, Chang H, et al. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography using a dual-lumen
endogastroscope for patients with Billroth II gastrectomy. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2013;2013:146867.
3. Rauwers AW, Voor In ’t Holt AF, Buijs JG, et al.
High prevalence rate of digestive tract bacteria in duodenoscopes: a nationwide study. Gut.
2018;67:1637–45.
4. Beilenhoff U, Biering H, Blum R, et al. Prevention
of multidrug-resistant infections from contaminated duodenoscopes: position Statement of the
5.
6.
7.
8.
European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
(ESGE) and European Society of Gastroenterology
Nurses and Associates (ESGENA). Endoscopy.
2017;49:1098–106.
Humphries RM, McDonnell G. Superbugs on duodenoscopes: the challenge of cleaning and disinfection of reusable devices. J Clin Microbiol.
2015;53(10):3118–25.
Adler DG, Conway JD, Coff JM, et al. EUS accessories. Technology status evaluation report. Gastrointest
Endosc. 2007;66:1076–81.
Ahmad N, Kochman ML. EUS instrumentation
and accessories: a primer. Gastrointest Endosc.
2000;52:s2–5.
Murad FM, Komanduri S, Abu Dayyeh BK,
et al. Echoendoscopes. Gastrointest Endosc.
2015;82(2):189–202.