International Journal of
Environmental Research
and Public Health
Article
Markers Specific to Bacteroides fragilis Group
Bacteria as Indicators of Anthropogenic Pollution of
Surface Waters
Sebastian Niest˛epski , Monika Harnisz * , Ewa Korzeniewska
and Adriana Osińska
Department of Engineering of Water Protection and Environmental Microbiology, Faculty of Geoengineering,
University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Prawocheńskiego 1, 10-720 Olsztyn, Poland;
sebastian.niestepski@uwm.edu.pl (S.N.); ewa.korzeniewska@uwm.edu.pl (E.K.);
adriana.osinska@uwm.edu.pl (A.O.)
* Correspondence: monika.harnisz@uwm.edu.pl
Received: 20 August 2020; Accepted: 27 September 2020; Published: 29 September 2020
Abstract: The aim of this study was to evaluate the applicability of markers specific to Bacteroides
fragilis group (BFG) bacteria as indicators of anthropogenic pollution of surface waters. In addition,
the impact of wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) on the spread of genes specific to fecal indicator
bacteria and genes encoding antimicrobial resistance in water bodies was also determined. Samples
of hospital wastewater (HWW), untreated wastewater (UWW), and treated wastewater (TWW)
evacuated from a WWTP were collected, and samples of river water were taken upstream (URW)
and downstream (DRW) from the wastewater discharge point to determine, by qPCR, the presence
of genes specific to BFG, Escherichia coli and Enterococcus faecalis, and the abundance of 11 antibiotic
resistance genes (ARGs) and two integrase genes. The total number of bacterial cells (TCN) in the
examined samples was determined by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Genes specific to BFG
predominated among the analyzed indicator microorganisms in HWW, and their copy numbers were
similar to those of genes specific to E. coli and E. faecalis in the remaining samples. The abundance of
genes specific to BFG was highly correlated with the abundance of genes characteristic of E. coli and E.
faecalis, all analyzed ARGs and intI genes. The results of this study indicate that genes specific to BFG
can be used in analyses of human fecal pollution, and as indicators of environmental contamination
with ARGs. A significant increase in the copy numbers of genes specific to BFG, E. coli, and seven
out of the 11 analyzed ARGs was noted in samples of river water collected downstream from the
wastewater discharge point, which suggests that WWTPs are an important source of these genes in
riparian environments.
Keywords: antibiotics resistance genes; anthropogenic pollution; Bacteroides fragilis group bacteria
1. Introduction
The microbiological quality of surface waters has to be monitored to ensure their sanitary safety.
According to European Union standards, the sanitary quality of surface water is evaluated based
mainly on the enumeration of Escherichia coli, coliform bacteria, and intestinal enterococci in water
samples. The presence of these bacteria in water samples points to recent contamination of aquatic
environments with fecal matter [1–4]. These analyses rely on culture-based laboratory techniques
(such as, e.g., the most-probable-number and membrane filtration methods), which are cheap and simple
to perform, but do not clearly identify the source of contamination. Escherichia coli and Enterococcus
bacteria are present in both human and animal feces; therefore, the source of pollution cannot be
accurately determined [5,6]. Moreover, a growing body of research suggests that E. coli and Enterococcus
indicator bacteria originate not only from human and animal feces, but also from contaminated soil,
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 7137; doi:10.3390/ijerph17197137
www.mdpi.com/journal/ijerph
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 7137
2 of 14
sewage sludge, or even algae farms [7,8]. Additional indicators, e.g., based on specific markers of
human fecal pollution, are needed to expand the range of the existing standard methods and overcome
their limitations in monitoring the microbiological quality of surface waters [9–12]. The application of
specific indicators of human fecal pollution would enhance the sensitivity of microbiological quality
assessments and enable precise identification of the sources of environmental contamination.
Bacteria of the family Bacteroides predominate in the human gut microbiota [13,14], therefore they
could be used as potential indicators of water contamination with human feces. Analyses of genetic
markers specific to Bacteroides bacteria colonizing the human gut, based on PCR and qPCR assays,
have become popular tools for tracking the sources of microbial contamination in surface waters in
recent years [10,15–17]. The application of markers specific to human-associated Bacteroides sp. would
support the unambiguous identification of water pollution sources, such as household wastewater or
treated sewage.
Antibiotic resistance constitutes a global health problem [18]. The widespread use of antibiotics in
human and veterinary medicine has accelerated the spread of antibiotic resistance determinants in the
environment [19]. The presence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria (ARB) and antibiotic resistance genes
(ARGs) in the natural environment is often associated with human activities, such as aquaculture,
livestock farming, and evacuation of treated municipal wastewater to surface water bodies [20].
Fecal E. coli, coliforms, and enterococci are the most frequently analyzed bacteria that are isolated
from treated wastewater [21,22]. Bacterial strains resistant to various groups of antibiotics are widely
identified. Antibiotic resistance genes are localized on mobile genetic elements, such as plasmids,
transposons, and integrons, which facilitates the spread of antibiotic resistance between bacteria of the
same and different origin via horizontal gene transfer (HGT) [23]. Research has demonstrated that
ARG-harboring plasmids are transferred between various strains of E. faecalis and between E. faecalis
and E. coli in wastewater [21]. Niest˛epski et al. [13,24] have recently reported high levels of antibiotic
resistance and considerable diversity of ARGs in Bacteroides fragilis group (BFG) strains isolated
from hospital wastewater and wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs), as well as the widespread
coexistence of genes specific to BFG and resistance genes in wastewater and rivers receiving treated
sewage. These observations suggest that fecal indicator bacteria could be robust indicators of water
contamination with ARGs.
Microbial counts in wastewater are reduced 10- to 100-fold during treatment [25]. Despite the above,
considerable amounts of ARB and ARGs are still present in treated wastewater which is evacuated
to surface water bodies and reaches ground water [20,26–30]. Korzeniewska and Harnisz [28],
Czekalski et al. [31], and Zhang et al. [32] demonstrated that total bacterial counts are reduced
during specific wastewater treatment processes, such as disinfection, but the percentage of ARB and,
consequently, ARGs in the bacterial community can increase. Previous studies have shown that
WWTPs can be sources of drug-resistant and multidrug-resistant bacteria, such as E. coli and Bacteroides
sp., in surface waters [24,33,34].
The potential spread of environmental ARB and ARGs and the transfer of ARGs from
environmental bacteria to human pathogens compromise the effectiveness of antimicrobial drugs,
which can have serious implications for public health [35]. The markers associated with HGT, such as
integrons, are often identified in locations that are subjected to high levels of anthropogenic pressure,
including in environments contaminated with wastewater [36]. Recent research has confirmed that
ARGs and integrase genes are effective indicators of human-caused pollution [37–39].
The above observations suggest that a new indicator which supports simultaneous assessments
of fecal contamination, as well as contamination with ARB and/or ARGs, should be introduced to
water quality analyses. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the applicability of markers
specific to BFG bacteria in analyses of the microbiological quality of surface waters. The following
research hypotheses were formulated and tested: (i) markers specific to BFG bacteria can be used as
indicators of anthropogenic pollution of surface waters; (ii) wastewater treatment plants are sources of
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 7137
3 of 14
dissemination of genes specific to fecal indicator bacteria and genes encoding antimicrobial resistance
in the environment.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Sample Collection
Samples of hospital wastewater (HWW, 100 mL), untreated wastewater (UWW, 100 mL), and
treated wastewater evacuated from the Łyna Wastewater Treatment Plant in Olsztyn, Poland (TWW,
300 mL), as well as samples of river water collected from the Łyna River around 600 m upstream and
downstream from the wastewater discharge point (URW and DRW, 500 mL each), were analyzed in
this study. The samples were collected into sterile bottles in winter (February) and summer (June)
of 2019, and they were transported at a temperature of 4 ◦ C to the laboratory for further analyses.
Samples of UWW were collected at the outlet of the coarse screen chamber.
2.2. Isolation of Genomic DNA from Wastewater and River Water Samples
All wastewater and river water samples were passed through standard polycarbonate membrane
filters with a hydrophobic edge (0.2 µm pore size) (Merck, Millipore, Burlington, MA, USA). Filters
containing sludge were cut into small pieces and transferred to sterile test tubes (2 mL). Tube contents
were combined with 1.5 mL of 1 × PBS, and the tubes were shaken at 200 rpm for 3 h at room
temperature. Genomic DNA was extracted with the Fast DNA SPIN Kit for Soil (MP Biomedicals,
Irvine, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The concentration and quality of
the isolated DNA were determined with the Nanodrop spectrophotometer (NanoDrop® ND-1000,
NanoDrop Technologies, Wilmington, DE, USA). Genomic DNA was stored at a temperature of −20 ◦ C
until analysis.
2.3. Determination of Total Number of Bacterial Cells by Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH)
The total number of bacterial cells (TCN) was determined by FISH and DAPI methods in 10 mL
specimens obtained from each sample of HWW, UWW, and TWW, and in 40 mL specimens obtained
from each sample of river water (URW and DRW). The specimens were fixed in freshly prepared
paraformaldehyde solution (pH 7.4, final concentration of 4%) and stored at room temperature for 1 h.
A set of serial solutions was made, and the fixed samples were passed through white polycarbonate
filters (0.2 µm pore size) (Merck, Millipore, Burlington, MA, USA) under low negative pressure.
The filters were twice rinsed with 20 mL of ultrapure water (dddH2 O), dried at room temperature, and
stored on Petri plates at a temperature of −20 ◦ C until analysis.
The TCN was determined under an epifluorescence microscope (BX61, Olympus, Tokyo, Japan)
by analyzing filter fragments stained with 4′ ,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI, final concentration of
0.1 µg/mL), with the use of a 16S rRNA-targeted EUB338 probe (hybridized to position 338–355 bp)
labeled with Cy3 cyanine dye. All samples were simultaneously analyzed with the NON338 probe
as a negative control for non-specific binding. According to Amann et al [40], probe sequences and
hybridization conditions are presented in Table S1. Oligonucleotide probes were synthesized by
Metabion (Martinsried, Munich, Germany). The number of bacterial cells in each wastewater and
river water sample was calculated based on 20 randomly selected fields across the entire surface of the
examined filter fragments, and it was expressed per mL of wastewater and river water samples.
2.4. Quantitative Analyses of Gene Prevalence
The conserved regions of the 16S rRNA gene and genes specific to E. coli (gene encoding the
beta-glucosidase enzyme, uidA), E. faecalis (fragment of the 16S rRNA gene, Faecalis1), and BFG
(gene encoding bacterioferritin, bfr, and a fragment of the 16S rRNA gene-HF183/BacR287) were
identified in samples of genomic DNA by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR).
The concentrations of genes encoding resistance to five groups of antibiotics, including beta-lactams
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 7137
4 of 14
(cfxA, blaAMP-C ), tetracyclines (tet(Q), tet(X)), macrolides, lincosamides and streptogramins (ermF, mef A,
linA), chloramphenicol (catA1, fexA), and vancomycin (vanA), were determined. The abundance of the
gene responsible for the synthesis of multidrug efflux transporter pumps (bexA) and genes encoding
class 1 and class 2 integrases (intI1 and intI2) was also determined. The copy numbers of the examined
genes were expressed per mL of wastewater or river water. The qPCR protocols were optimized
based on previously described primers, and are presented in Table S1 [15–17,41–50]. All qPCR assays
were carried out in the Roche LightCycler® 480 (Roche Applied Science, Indianapolis, IN, USA) in
15 µL of the reaction mix containing 1 µL (20 ng) of the genomic DNA matrix. All analyses were
performed in triplicate. The standard curves for every gene were derived from serial solutions of
plasmids containing the target genes.
2.5. Statistical Analysis
The differences in the concentrations of the analyzed genes in wastewater and river water samples
were determined by Kruskal–Wallis (KW) ANOVA. The correlations between the numbers of the
examined genes were determined based on the values of Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient.
The Mann–Whitney U (M–W U) test for two independent samples was used to compare gene
concentrations in samples of river water collected upstream (URW) and downstream (DRW) from
the wastewater discharge point. Statistical analyses were conducted in the Statistica 13.2 program
(StatSoft Inc., 1984–2019, Tulsa, OK, USA) at a significance level of p < 0.05. A cluster analysis was
performed with the use of Ward’s method. The results of the cluster analysis and correlation analysis
were visualized in the R environment (R v. 3.5.2 and RStudio v. 1.1.463, Boston, MA, USA) with the
use of gplots and corrplot packages.
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Total Number of Bacterial Cells and 16S rRNA Gene Copy Numbers in Wastewater and River
Water Samples
The TCN of the examined wastewater and river water samples ranged from 105 to 109 cells/mL
(Figure 1). The highest values were noted in HWW (108 cells/mL) and UWW (108 –109 cells/mL). In the
remaining samples, the TCN ranged from 105 to 106 cells/mL. The copy numbers of the 16S rRNA gene
were determined by qPCR. The results were used to estimate total bacterial counts in the analyzed
samples. The highest concentration of the 16S rRNA gene was noted in HWW (1010 copies/mL) and
UWW (109 –1011 copies/mL) (Figure 1, Table S2). The abundance of the 16S rRNA gene was determined
at 107 –108 copies/mL in TWW, and at 108 –109 copies/mL in river water sampled upstream (URW)
and downstream (DRW) from the wastewater discharge point. Niestepski et al. [13], Korzeniewska
and Harnisz [28], and Caucci et al. [51] reported similar 16S rRNA gene copy numbers in various
samples collected from WWTPs. The TCN determined in the FISH assay was significantly lower than
the concentration of the 16S rRNA gene determined by qPCR in all samples collected both in winter
and summer (KW, p < 0.05) (Table S5). These differences can probably be attributed to the fact that a
single bacterial cell can contain more than one copy of the 16S rRNA gene, and that the number of
copies can differ across and within taxa [52,53]. In the FISH method, an EUB probe is used to observe
and count individual bacteria regardless of the number of 16S rRNA gene copies inside each bacterial
cell. The qPCR assay supports estimations of the number of 16S rRNA gene copies in a sample, but not
in bacterial populations in the examined samples, and its results cannot be used to determine the exact
number of bacterial cells in a sample [52]. Therefore, the FISH method appears to be better suited for
determinations of TCN than qPCR.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 7137
5 of 14
Figure 1. The total number of bacterial cells (FISH) and the concentrations of bacterial genes (qPCR) in
wastewater and river water samples.
3.2. Concentrations of Genes Specific to Escherichia coli, Enterococcus faecalis, and BFG, and ARGs in
Wastewater and River Water Samples
The concentrations of genes specific to indicator bacteria and BFG as well as ARGs and genes
encoding integrase in samples of wastewater and river water are presented in Figure 1 and Table S2.
The copy numbers of genes specific to indicator bacteria, ARGs, and integrase genes were expressed in
absolute values (copies/mL), due to variations in the structure of bacterial populations in wastewater
and river water samples [52], as well as differences between the TCN determined in the FISH assay
and the number of 16S rRNA gene copies determined by qPCR. The absolute and relative abundance
of the examined genes in each sample is presented in Figures 1 and 2, and in Supplementary Materials
–
(Tables S2–S4).
–
Figure 2. Heatmap of gene concentrations in wastewater and river water samples collected in winter
(W) and summer (S) (copies/mL) (clusters are separated by the red line).
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 7137
6 of 14
The uidA and Faecalis1 genes, which are specific to E. coli and E. faecalis fecal indicator bacteria,
respectively, were identified, and the concentrations of the genes characteristic of BFG (bfr for
B. thetaiotaomicron, B. vulgatus, B. fragilis, B. caccae, B. ovatus, B. eggerthii, B. uniformis, B. stercoris,
Parabacteroides merdae, and P. distasonis; HF183/BacR287 marker for B. dorei) were determined in the
present study. In HWW and UWW samples, the number of uidA and Faecalis1 gene copies was
determined at 107 –108 copies/mL and 106 –107 copies/mL, respectively, whereas the abundance of genes
specific to BFG ranged from 104 to 109 copies/mL in the examined samples. The copy numbers of the
bfr gene and the HF183/BacR287 marker were significantly lower in UWW than in HWW (M–W U,
p < 0.05), and their concentrations exceeded those of uidA and Faecalis1 genes in HWW. In samples
of TWW and river water, the concentrations of genes specific to these bacteria were determined
at 102 to 105 copies/mL, and the number of Faecalis1 gene copies was lowest (Figure 1, Table S2).
The concentrations of genes specific to BFG, E. coli, and E. faecalis differed across sampling seasons (KW,
p < 0.05) (Table S5). In all samples, the abundance of genes characteristic of E. coli and E. faecalis was
below the TCN values determined in the FISH assay. In turn, the copy numbers of genes specific to BFG
exceeded the TCN in HWW samples collected in both winter and summer (Table S3). In the remaining
samples, the concentrations of genes specific to BFG were lower than the TCN determined by the FISH
method. The bfr gene and the HF183/BacR287 marker are localized within 16S rRNA. The genome of a
single bacterium of the genus Bacteroides harbors five copies of the 16S rRNA gene on average [53].
However, the results of this study point to a dominance of BFG in HWW, and to high concentrations of
genes of all indicator bacteria in the remaining samples of wastewater and river water, in particular
DRW. Rocha et al. [54] reported that genes characteristic of E. coli and E. faecalis are not effectively
removed during wastewater treatment. Our previous studies [13,24] demonstrated that BFG bacteria
are not completely eliminated in WWTPs during the activated sludge process. Feng et al. [55] and
Ordaz et al. [56] argued that, similarly to E. coli and E. faecalis, Bacteroides species should be regarded
as fecal indicator bacteria to accurately describe environmental contamination with human feces.
The present findings suggest that markers specific to BFG, in particular HF183/BacR287, are not only as
effective as the standard indicators of fecal contamination, but also support accurate identification of
the sources of human-caused pollution, which validates the first research hypothesis.
Eleven ARGs and two genes encoding integrase synthesis were identified in the analyzed samples
of wastewater and river water. Significant differences were noted between the total concentrations
of ARGs and intI genes in winter and summer samples (KW, p < 0.05) (Table S5). The highest copy
numbers of ARGs were determined in HWW, followed by UWW. In those samples, the concentrations
of ARGs ranged from 103 to 1011 copies/mL. Genes encoding resistance to tetracyclines (tet(Q), tet(X)),
MLS antibiotics (ermF, linA, mef A), and the cfxA gene encoding resistance to beta-lactams were most
abundant, and their average concentrations in both seasons ranged from 107 to 109 copies/mL. The fexA
gene encoding resistance to chloramphenicol was the least abundant ARG in HWW and UWW, and
its concentration was determined at 103 to 106 copies/mL. The analyzed ARGs were less abundant in
TWW and river water, at 101 to 105 copies/mL; ermF, tet(Q), and tet(X) were the dominant genes in those
samples. The copy numbers of nearly all analyzed ARGs were lowest in URW samples. Similarly to
this study, numerous researchers have reported on the widespread presence of ARGs in both TWW and
the receiving water bodies [29,51,54,57–63]. Mao et al. [61] observed an increase in the copy numbers
of ARGs during wastewater treatment in WWTPs. High concentrations of ARGs in wastewater and
river water could point to the presence of drug-resistant and multidrug-resistant bacterial strains in
wastewater and river water.
The concentrations of most ARGs in HWW were similar in both sampling seasons. In UWW, the
copy numbers of ARGs were markedly lower in summer than in winter. According to Guo et al. [64]
and Rodriguez-Mozaz et al. [65], the copy numbers of ARGs are closely correlated with antibiotic
concentrations in wastewater. The results of the current study suggest that antibiotic consumption
in hospitals was fairly similar in summer and winter, but it was higher in the outpatient setting in
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 7137
7 of 14
winter. Similar observations were made by Ciszewski et al. [66], who reported a significant increase in
antibiotic consumption in Poland in fall/winter.
In HWW and UWW, the concentration of the intI1 gene ranged from 106 to 1010 copies/mL, and
the number of intI2 gene copies was estimated at 106 to 109 copies/mL. The abundance of intI1 and intI2
genes was determined at 103 –107 copies/mL in the remaining samples. The abundance of the intI1 gene
was considerably higher than the concentration of the intI2 gene. The present results corroborate the
findings of other authors who reported on the dominance of the intI1 gene among integrase-encoding
genes in environmental samples [67]. Integrons are ubiquitous in TWW [25,32,68,69] and in rivers such
as the Vistula, Warta, and Łyna [29,60,70,71]. These genetic structures promote rapid bacterial evolution
by enabling bacteria to accumulate, express, and transfer coding sequences such as ARGs [67,72].
According to Gillings et al. [37], class 1 integrons could be the main mobile genetic elements responsible
for the spread of antibiotic resistance, due to their widespread prevalence in the environment.
The concentrations of the analyzed genes in wastewater and river water samples collected in
winter and summer were subjected to cluster analysis with the use of Ward’s method. The results
were visualized in a heatmap with dendrograms (Figure 2). Based on these findings, wastewater
and river water samples were divided into two clusters. The first cluster was composed solely of
untreated wastewater (HWW and UWW) collected in both winter and summer. These samples were
characterized by the highest abundance of the tested genes. The second cluster contained samples of
treated wastewater and river water (TWW, URW and DRW).
A correlation matrix based on the values of Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient revealed
significant relationships between the TCN, the abundance of the 16S rRNA gene, genes specific to BFG,
E. coli, and E. faecalis, integrase genes, and ARGs in wastewater and river water samples (Figure 3,
Table S6). The TCN was correlated with the abundance of the conserved regions of the 16S rRNA gene
at r = 0.70 (p < 0.05). This observation confirms that despite differences in TCN and the concentration
of the 16S rRNA gene in the examined environmental samples, the above values were highly correlated.
Strong positive correlations were noted between the TCN and the abundance of all analyzed ARGs
(r = 0.61–0.85, p < 0.05), which points to the presence of ARB in wastewater and river water samples.
The copy numbers of genes encoding class 1 and class 2 integrons (r = 0.84–0.86, p < 0.05) and ARGs
(r = 0.50–0.77, p < 0.05) increased with a rise in the concentration of the 16S rRNA gene, which could
point to horizontal gene transfer between bacterial populations colonizing wastewater and river water.
Similar results were reported by An et al. [67].
The prevalence of genes specific to BFG in the examined samples was closely correlated with the
concentrations of genes characteristic of E. coli (uidA) and E. faecalis (Faecalis1) (r = 0.70–0.85, p < 0.05).
These results indicate that BFG bacteria coexist with E. coli and E. faecalis, and should be regarded
as microbial indicators of water quality in screening tests. The abundance of genes specific to BFG,
E. coli, and E. faecalis was also highly correlated with all examined ARGs (r = 0.52–0.98, p < 0.05).
The presence of indicator bacteria in wastewater and river water samples points to the coexistence
of ARGs in the analyzed environments, and high concentrations of ARGs in water can be attributed
to contamination with indicator bacteria [73,74]. In the present study, a significant correlation was
also noted between the copy numbers of vanA and Faecalis1 genes (r = 0.72, p < 0.05), which could
suggest that vancomycin-resistant E. faecalis strains (VRE) were present in the tested samples. In a
study by Oravcova et al. [75], enterococci harboring the vanA gene were frequently identified in
TWW, which indicates that these bacteria are not effectively eliminated during wastewater treatment.
The high coefficients of correlation between the abundance of genes specific to BFG and genes encoding
resistance to tetracyclines, MLS antibiotics, beta-lactams, and the bexA gene confirm previous findings
that BFG bacteria are a major reservoir of these ARGs [24,76,77]. In the current study, close correlations
were found between the prevalence of all analyzed ARGs in environmental samples (r = 0.63–0.98,
p < 0.05). These results, as well as previous findings [29], point to the presence of correlations between
the abundance of all examined ARGs in HWW, UWW, TWW, and river water. The genes specific
to BFG are not only indicators of fecal pollution, but they can also be used to determine the spread
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 7137
8 of 14
of ARGs in the environment. Karkman et al. [73] and Stachler et al. [78] also demonstrated that the
presence of ARGs in the environment is closely related to fecal contamination markers, and therefore it
could be associated with fecal contamination of the environment.
Figure 3. Spearman’s rank correlations between the concentrations of the analyzed genes (p < 0.05).
Spearman’s rank correlations
Positive correlations are marked in blue, and negative correlations are marked in red. Color intensity
and the size of circles correspond to the values of correlation coefficients.
3.3. The Influence of WWTPs on Gene Abundance in River Water
The abundance of the analyzed genes in samples of river water collected upstream and
– downstream
from the wastewater discharge point (URW and DRW, respectively) was compared to determine the
potential influence of a WWTP on the contamination of river water, and to evaluate the applicability of
markers specific to BFG bacteria as indicators of anthropogenic pollution (Table S7).
– In the group of
genes specific to BFG, E. coli, and E. faecalis, a significant increase in the copy numbers of bfr and uidA
genes and the HF183/BacR287 marker was noted in DRW (M-W U, p < 0.05), whereas no differences
were observed in the number of Faecalis1 gene copies. These results clearly indicate that the evaluated
WWTP contributed to the fecal contamination of river water. The concentrations of seven out of the 11
(63.63%) tested ARGs were higher in DRW than in URW (M–W U, p < 0.05). The abundance of selected
genes was three orders of magnitude higher in DRW than in URW, and the greatest differences were
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 7137
9 of 14
observed in winter. No significant differences in the abundance of the remaining four genes (blaAMP-C ,
tet(Q), fexA, and vanA) were noted in river water samples (M–W U, p > 0.05). The copy numbers
of both genes encoding integrase synthesis were higher in DRW than in URW (M–W U, p > 0.05).
These results indicate, in accordance with the second research hypothesis, that WWTPs contribute to
the contamination of river water with genes specific to indicator bacteria and BFG as well as ARGs and
genes encoding class 1 and class 2 integrases. Numerous researchers have demonstrated that WWTPs
are important sources of multidrug-resistant bacteria, including bacteria that are potentially pathogenic
for humans (B. fragilis, E. coli, and E. faecalis) and harbor integrons or gene cassettes that carry resistance
genes [24,28,29,67,79,80]. According to Giebułtowicz et al. [79], these observations can be probably
attributed to the fact that wastewater is only partially treated in WWTPs. Environmental contamination
with indicator bacteria can be detected with qPCR-based techniques, which offer a viable alternative to
standard time-consuming culture methods [81,82]. The qPCR methods also support the use of specific
indicators, such as the bfr gene and the HF183/BacR287 marker, in environmental screening tests, to
determine fecal contamination and human-caused pollution, including the presence of ARGs.
4. Conclusions
This study evaluated the applicability of markers specific to BFG bacteria as indicators of
anthropogenic pollution in surface waters. Samples of HWW, UWW, TWW, and water from a river
receiving TWW were analyzed. The concentrations of genes specific to BFG were high in all samples,
and they were closely correlated with the abundance of genes specific to E. coli and E. faecalis, as well
as ARGs and integrase genes. These results suggest that genetic markers specific to BFG can be used
as indicators of anthropogenic pollution in the aquatic environment. The present findings indicate
that the presence of indicator bacteria in wastewater and river water samples is correlated with the
abundance of ARGs in these environments. This study also demonstrated that TWW evacuated from
the examined WWTP contributes to the contamination of river water with genes specific to fecal
bacteria, ARGs, and genes encoding class 1 and class 2 integrases.
Supplementary Materials: The following are available online at http://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/19/7137/s1:
Figure S1. Genes copy number per cells in environmental samples; Figure S2. Cells and genes copy number per
16S rRNA in environmental samples; Table S1. Oligonucleotide primers and parameters used for the detection of
genes, with qPCR analysis and FISH; Table S2. Average gene concentrations in wastewater and river water samples
(copies/mL); Table S3. Average gene concentrations in wastewater and river water samples (copies/cells); Table
S4. Average gene concentrations in wastewater and river water samples (kopii/16S rRNA); Table S5. Differences
in gene concentrations in the analyzed samples between seasons (Kruskal–Wallis ANOVA; significant results
are marked in red, p < 0.05); Table S6. Correlations between gene concentrations (Spearman’s rank correlation
coefficient; significant results are marked in red, p < 0.05); Table S7. A comparison of gene concentrations in URW
and DRW (Mann–Whitney U test; significant results are marked in red, p < 0.05).
Author Contributions: Conceptualization: S.N. and M.H.; methodology: M.H. and E.K.; software: S.N.; validation:
S.N., M.H., and A.O.; formal analysis: S.N.; investigation: S.N.; resources: S.N. and M.H.; data curation: S.N.;
writing—original draft preparation: S.N. and M.H.; writing—review and editing: S.N. and E.K.; visualization:
S.N.; supervision: M.H.; project administration: S.N.; funding acquisition: S.N. All authors have read and agreed
to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding: This study was supported by the Polish National Science Centre [grant No. 2016/23/N/NZ9/02167].
Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funder had no role in the design of the study;
in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish
the results.
References
1.
2.
ISO 9308-1:2014/AMD 1:2016, Water Quality—Enumeration of Escherichia Coli and Coliform Bacteria—Part 1:
Membrane Filtration Method for Waters with Low Bacterial Background Flora—Amendment 1; The International
Organisation of Standardisation: Geneva, Switzerland, 2014.
ISO 9308-2:2012, Water Quality—Enumeration of Escherichia Coli and Coliform Bacteria—Part 2: Most Probable
Number Method; The International Organisation of Standardisation: Geneva, Switzerland, 2012.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 7137
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
10 of 14
ISO 7899-1:1998/COR 1:2000, Water Quality—Detection and Enumeration of Intestinal Enterococci—Part
1: Miniaturized Method (Most Probable Number) for Surface and Waste Water—Technical Corrigendum 1;
The International Organisation of Standardisation: Geneva, Switzerland, 2000.
ISO 7899-2:2000, Water Quality—Detection and Enumeration of Intestinal Enterococci—Part 2: Membrane Filtration
Method; The International Organisation of Standardisation: Geneva, Switzerland, 2000.
Boehm, A.B.; Ashbolt, N.J.; Colford, J.M.; Dunbar, L.E.; Fleming, L.E.; Gold, M.A.; Hansel, A.; Hunter, P.R.;
Ichida, A.M.; McGee, C.D.; et al. A sea change ahead for recreational water quality criteria. J. Water Health
2009, 7, 9–20. [CrossRef]
Schriewer, A.; Odagiri, M.; Wuertz, S.; Misra, P.R.; Panigrahi, P.; Clasen, T.; Jenkins, M.W. Human and
Animal Fecal Contamination of Community Water Sources, Stored Drinking Water and Hands in Rural
India Measured with Validated Microbial Source Tracking Assays. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2015, 93, 509–516.
[CrossRef]
Byappanahalli, M.N.; Nevers, M.B.; Korajkic, A.; Staley, Z.R.; Harwood, V.J. Enterococci in the Environment.
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2012, 76, 685–706. [CrossRef]
Gomez-Donate, M.; Casanovas-Massana, A.; Muniesa, M.; Blanch, A.R. Development of new host-specific
Bacteroides qPCRs for the identification of fecal contamination sources in water. MicrobiologyOpen 2016, 5,
83–94. [CrossRef]
Cao, Y.P.; Sivaganesan, M.; Kelty, C.A.; Wang, D.; Boehm, A.B.; Griffith, J.F.; Weisberg, S.B.; Shanks, O.C.
A human fecal contamination score for ranking recreational sites using the HF183/BacR287 quantitative
real-time PCR method. Water Res. 2018, 128, 148–156. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Harwood, V.J.; Staley, C.; Badgley, B.D.; Borges, K.; Korajkic, A. Microbial source tracking markers for
detection of fecal contamination in environmental waters: Relationships between pathogens and human
health outcomes. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2014, 38, 1–40. [CrossRef]
Parker, J.K.; McIntyre, D.; Noble, R.T. Characterizing fecal contamination in stormwater runoff in coastal
North Carolina, USA. Water Res. 2010, 44, 4186–4194. [CrossRef]
Sercu, B.; Van De Werfhorst, L.C.; Murray, J.; Holden, P.A. Storm Drains are Sources of Human Fecal Pollution
during Dry Weather in Three Urban Southern California Watersheds. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009, 43, 293–298.
[CrossRef]
Niest˛epski, S.; Harnisz, M.; Ciesielski, S.; Korzeniewska, E.; Osińska, A. Environmental fate of Bacteroidetes,
with particular emphasis on Bacteroides fragilis group bacteria and their specific antibiotic resistance genes,
in activated sludge wastewater treatment plants. J. Hazard. Mater. 2020, 394, 122544. [CrossRef]
Wu, G.D.; Chen, J.; Hoffmann, C.; Bittinger, K.; Chen, Y.Y.; Keilbaugh, S.A.; Bewtra, M.; Knights, D.;
Walters, W.A.; Knight, R.; et al. Linking Long-Term Dietary Patterns with Gut Microbial Enterotypes. Science
2011, 334, 105–108. [CrossRef]
Bernhard, A.E.; Field, K.G. A PCR assay to discriminate human and ruminant feces on the basis of host
differences in Bacteroides-Prevotella genes encoding 16S rRNA. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2000, 66, 4571–4574.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
Green, H.C.; Haugland, R.A.; Varma, M.; Millen, H.T.; Borchardt, M.A.; Field, K.G.; Walters, W.A.; Knight, R.;
Sivaganesan, M.; Kelty, C.A.; et al. Improved HF183 Quantitative Real-Time PCR Assay for Characterization
of Human Fecal Pollution in Ambient Surface Water Samples. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2014, 80, 3086–3094.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
Liu, C.; Song, Y.; McTeague, M.; Vu, A.W.; Wexler, H.; Finegold, S.M. Rapid identification of the species of
the Bacteroides fragilis group by multiplex PCR assays using group-and species-specific primers. FEMS
Microbiol. Lett. 2003, 222, 9–16. [CrossRef]
WHO. Antimicrobial Resistance: Global Report on Surveillance 2014; World Health Organization: Geneva,
Switzerland, 2014.
Zhang, Q.Q.; Ying, G.G.; Pan, C.G.; Liu, Y.S.; Zhao, J.L. Comprehensive Evaluation of Antibiotics Emission
and Fate in the River Basins of China: Source Analysis, Multimedia Modeling, and Linkage to Bacterial
Resistance. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2015, 49, 6772–6782. [CrossRef]
Wu, D.L.; Zhang, M.; He, L.X.; Zou, H.Y.; Liu, Y.S.; Li, B.B.; Yang, Y.Y.; Liu, C.X.; He, L.Y.; Ying, G.G.
Contamination profile of antibiotic resistance genes in ground water in comparison with surface water.
Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 715. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 7137
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
33.
34.
35.
36.
37.
38.
39.
40.
41.
11 of 14
Karkman, A.; Do, T.T.; Walsh, F.; Virta, M.P.J. Antibiotic-Resistance Genes in Waste Water. Trends Microbiol.
2018, 26, 220–228. [CrossRef]
Rizzo, L.; Manaia, C.; Merlin, C.; Schwartz, T.; Dagot, C.; Ploy, M.C.; Michael, I.; Fatta-Kassinos, D.
Urban wastewater treatment plants as hotspots for antibiotic resistant bacteria and genes spread into the
environment: A review. Sci. Total Environ. 2013, 447, 345–360. [CrossRef]
Allen, H.K.; Donato, J.; Wang, H.H.; Cloud-Hansen, K.A.; Davies, J.; Handelsman, J. Call of the wild:
Antibiotic resistance genes in natural environments. Nat. Rev. Microbiol 2010, 8, 251–259. [CrossRef]
Niestepski, S.; Harnisz, M.; Korzeniewska, E.; Aguilera-Arreola, M.G.; Contreras-Rodriguez, A.;
Filipkowska, Z.; Osinska, A. The emergence of antimicrobial resistance in environmental strains of the
Bacteroides fragilis group. Environ. Int. 2019, 124, 408–419. [CrossRef]
Marin, I.; Goni, P.; Lasheras, A.M.; Ormad, M.P. Efficiency of a Spanish wastewater treatment plant for
removal potentially pathogens: Characterization of bacteria and protozoa along water and sludge treatment
lines. Ecol. Eng. 2015, 74, 28–32. [CrossRef]
Bengtsson-Palme, J.; Kristiansson, E.; Larsson, D.G.J. Environmental factors influencing the development
and spread of antibiotic resistance. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2018, 42, 68–80. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Huang, J.J.; Hu, H.Y.; Lu, S.Q.; Li, Y.; Tang, F.; Lu, Y.; Wei, B. Monitoring and evaluation of antibiotic-resistant
bacteria at a municipal wastewater treatment plant in China. Environ. Int. 2012, 42, 31–36. [CrossRef]
[PubMed]
Korzeniewska, E.; Harnisz, M. Relationship between modification of activated sludge wastewater treatment
and changes in antibiotic resistance of bacteria. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 639, 304–315. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Osinska, A.; Korzeniewska, E.; Harnisz, M.; Felis, E.; Bajkacz, S.; Jachimowicz, P.; Niestepski, S.; Konopka, I.
Small-scale wastewater treatment plants as a source of the dissemination of antibiotic resistance genes in the
aquatic environment. J. Hazard. Mater. 2020, 381. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Yang, Y.; Li, B.; Zou, S.C.; Fang, H.H.P.; Zhang, T. Fate of antibiotic resistance genes in sewage treatment
plant revealed by metagenomic approach. Water Res. 2014, 62, 97–106. [CrossRef]
Czekalski, N.; Berthold, T.; Caucci, S.; Egli, A.; Burgmann, H. Increased levels of multiresistant bacteria and
resistance genes after wastewater treatment and their dissemination into Lake Geneva, Switzerland. Front.
Microbiol. 2012, 3. [CrossRef]
Zhang, Y.L.; Marrs, C.F.; Simon, C.; Xi, C.W. Wastewater treatment contributes to selective increase of
antibiotic resistance among Acinetobacter spp. Sci. Total Environ. 2009, 407, 3702–3706. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Osinska, A.; Harnisz, M.; Korzeniewska, E. Prevalence of plasmid-mediated multidrug resistance
determinants in fluoroquinolone-resistant bacteria isolated from sewage and surface water. Environ. Sci.
Pollut. Res. 2016, 23, 10818–10831. [CrossRef]
Osinska, A.; Korzeniewska, E.; Harnisz, M.; Niestepski, S. The prevalence and characterization of
antibiotic-resistant and virulent Escherichia coli strains in the municipal wastewater system and their
environmental fate. Sci. Total Environ. 2017, 577, 367–375. [CrossRef]
Qiao, M.; Ying, G.G.; Singer, A.C.; Zhu, Y.G. Review of antibiotic resistance in China and its environment.
Environ. Int. 2018, 110, 160–172. [CrossRef]
Aubertheau, E.; Stalder, T.; Mondamert, L.; Ploy, M.C.; Dagot, C.; Labanowski, J. Impact of wastewater
treatment plant discharge on the contamination of river biofilms by pharmaceuticals and antibiotic resistance.
Sci. Total Environ. 2017, 579, 1387–1398. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Gillings, M.R. Integrons: Past, Present, and Future. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2014, 78, 257–277. [CrossRef]
[PubMed]
Gillings, M.R.; Gaze, W.H.; Pruden, A.; Smalla, K.; Tiedje, J.M.; Zhu, Y.G. Using the class 1 integron-integrase
gene as a proxy for anthropogenic pollution. ISME J. 2015, 9, 1269–1279. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Zheng, W.L.; Huyan, J.Q.; Tian, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Wen, X.H. Clinical class 1 integron-integrase gene—A promising
indicator to monitor the abundance and elimination of antibiotic resistance genes in an urban wastewater
treatment plant. Environ. Int. 2020, 135. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Amann, R.I.; Binder, B.J.; Olson, R.J.; Chisholm, S.W.; Devereux, R.; Stahl, D.A. Combination of 16S
rRNA-targeted oligonucleotide probes with flow cytometry for analyzing mixed microbial populations.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1990, 56, 1919–1925. [CrossRef]
Nadkarni, M.A.; Martin, F.E.; Jacques, N.A.; Hunter, N. Determination of bacterial load by real-time PCR
using a broad-range (universal) probe and primers set. Microbiology 2002, 148, 257–266. [CrossRef]
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 7137
42.
43.
44.
45.
46.
47.
48.
49.
50.
51.
52.
53.
54.
55.
56.
57.
58.
59.
60.
61.
12 of 14
Heijnen, L.; Medema, G. Quantitative detection of E. coli, E. coli O157 and other shiga toxin producing E. coli
in water samples using a culture method combined with real-time PCR. J. Water Health 2006, 4, 487–498.
[CrossRef]
Lu, J.; Santo Domingo, J.W.; Lamendella, R.; Edge, T.; Hill, S. Phylogenetic diversity and molecular detection
of bacteria in gull feces. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2008, 74, 3969–3976. [CrossRef]
Eitel, Z.; Soki, J.; Urban, E.; Nagy, E.; Anaerobic, E.S.G. The prevalence of antibiotic resistance genes
in Bacteroides fragilis group strains isolated in different European countries. Anaerobe 2013, 21, 43–49.
[CrossRef]
Ruppé, E.; Hem, S.; Lath, S.; Gautier, V.; Ariey, F.; Sarthou, J.; Monchy, D.; Arlet, G. CTX-M β-lactamases in
Escherichia coli from community-acquired urinary tract infections.” Cambodia. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2009, 15,
741–748. [CrossRef]
Ng, L.K.; Martin, I.; Alfa, M.; Mulvey, M. Multiplex PCR for the detection of tetracycline resistant genes.
Mol. Cell. Probes 2001, 15, 209–215. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Li, J.; Shao, B.; Shen, J.; Wang, S.; Wu, Y. Occurrence of Chloramphenicol-Resistance Genes as Environmental
Pollutants from Swine Feedlots. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013, 47, 2892–2897. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Maidhof, H.; Guerra, B.; Abbas, S.; Elsheikha, H.M.; Whittam, T.S.; Beutin, L. A multiresistant clone of Shiga
toxin-producing Escherichia coli O118: H16 is spread in cattle and humans over different European countries.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2002, 68, 5834–5842. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
He, Y.H.; Ruan, G.J.; Hao, H.; Xue, F.; Ma, Y.K.; Zhu, S.N.; Zheng, B. Real-time PCR for the rapid detection of
vanA, vanB and vanM genes. J. Microbiol. Immunol. Infect. 2019. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Goldstein, C.; Lee, M.D.; Sanchez, S.; Hudson, C.; Phillips, B.; Register, B.; Grady, M.; Liebert, C.;
Summers, A.O.; White, D.G.; et al. Incidence of class 1 and 2 integrases in clinical and commensal
bacteria from livestock, companion animals, and exotics. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2001, 45, 723–726.
[CrossRef]
Caucci, S.; Karkman, A.; Cacace, D.; Rybicki, M.; Timpel, P.; Voolaid, V.; Gurke, R.; Virta, M.; Berendonk, T.U.
Seasonality of antibiotic prescriptions for outpatients and resistance genes in sewers and wastewater
treatment plant outflow. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2016, 92. [CrossRef]
Kembel, S.W.; Wu, M.; Eisen, J.A.; Green, J.L. Incorporating 16S Gene Copy Number Information Improves
Estimates of Microbial Diversity and Abundance. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2012, 8. [CrossRef]
Vetrovsky, T.; Baldrian, P. The Variability of the 16S rRNA Gene in Bacterial Genomes and Its Consequences
for Bacterial Community Analyses. PLoS ONE 2013, 8. [CrossRef]
Rocha, J.; Fernandes, T.; Riquelme, M.V.; Zhu, N.; Pruden, A.; Manaia, C.M. Comparison of Culture- and
Quantitative PCR-Based Indicators of Antibiotic Resistance in Wastewater, Recycled Water, and Tap Water.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 4217. [CrossRef]
Feng, S.C.; McLellan, S.L. Highly Specific Sewage-Derived Bacteroides Quantitative PCR Assays Target
Sewage-Polluted Waters. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2019, 85. [CrossRef]
Ordaz, G.; Merino-Mascorro, J.A.; Garcia, S.; Heredia, N. Persistence of Bacteroidales and other fecal indicator
bacteria on inanimated materials, melon and tomato at various storage conditions. Int. J. Food Microbiol.
2019, 299, 33–38. [CrossRef]
Chen, B.A.; Hao, L.J.; Guo, X.Y.; Wang, N.; Ye, B.P. Prevalence of antibiotic resistance genes of wastewater and
surface water in livestock farms of Jiangsu Province, China. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2015, 22, 13950–13959.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
Fan, X.Y.; Gao, J.F.; Pan, K.L.; Li, D.C.; Dai, H.H.; Li, X. Functional genera, potential pathogens and predicted
antibiotic resistance genes in 16 full-scale wastewater treatment plants treating different types of wastewater.
Bioresour. Technol. 2018, 268, 97–106. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Jia, S.Y.; Zhang, X.X.; Miao, Y.; Zhao, Y.T.; Ye, L.; Li, B.; Zhang, T. Fate of antibiotic resistance genes and
their associations with bacterial community in livestock breeding wastewater and its receiving river water.
Water Res. 2017, 124, 259–268. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Makowska, N.; Koczura, R.; Mokracka, J. Class 1 integrase, sulfonamide and tetracycline resistance genes in
wastewater treatment plant and surface water. Chemosphere 2016, 144, 1665–1673. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Mao, D.Q.; Yu, S.; Rysz, M.; Luo, Y.; Yang, F.X.; Li, F.X.; Hou, J.; Mu, Q.H.; Alvarez, P.J.J. Prevalence and
proliferation of antibiotic resistance genes in two municipal wastewater treatment plants. Water Res. 2015,
85, 458–466. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 7137
62.
63.
64.
65.
66.
67.
68.
69.
70.
71.
72.
73.
74.
75.
76.
77.
78.
79.
80.
13 of 14
Narciso-da-Rocha, C.; Manaia, C.M. The influence of the autochthonous wastewater microbiota and gene
host on the fate of invasive antibiotic resistance genes. Sci. Total Environ. 2017, 575, 932–940. [CrossRef]
Wang, M.Y.; Shen, W.T.; Yan, L.; Wang, X.H.; Xu, H. Stepwise impact of urban wastewater treatment on the
bacterial community structure, antibiotic contents, and prevalence of antimicrobial resistance. Environ. Pollut.
2017, 231, 1578–1585. [CrossRef]
Guo, X.Y.; Yan, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Xu, W.L.; Kong, D.Y.; Shan, Z.J.; Wang, N. Behavior of antibiotic resistance
genes under extremely high-level antibiotic selection pressures in pharmaceutical wastewater treatment
plants. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 612, 119–128. [CrossRef]
Rodriguez-Mozaz, S.; Chamorro, S.; Marti, E.; Huerta, B.; Gros, M.; Sanchez-Melsio, A.; Borrego, C.M.;
Barcelo, D.; Balcazar, J.L. Occurrence of antibiotics and antibiotic resistance genes in hospital and urban
wastewaters and their impact on the receiving river. Water Res. 2015, 69, 234–242. [CrossRef]
Ciszewski, M.; Czekaj, T.; Szewczyk, E.M. Outpatient Antibiotic Consumption Fluctuations in a View of
Unreasonable Antibacterial Therapy. Pol. J. Microbiol. 2017, 66, 119–123. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
An, X.L.; Chen, Q.L.; Zhu, D.; Zhu, Y.G.; Gillings, M.R.; Su, J.Q. Impact of Wastewater Treatment on the
Prevalence of Integrons and the Genetic Diversity of Integron Gene Cassettes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2018,
84. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Zhang, X.X.; Zhang, T.; Zhang, M.; Fang, H.H.P.; Cheng, S.P. Characterization and quantification of class 1
integrons and associated gene cassettes in sewage treatment plants. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2009, 82,
1169–1177. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Lin, M.; Liang, J.J.; Zhang, X.; Wu, X.M.; Yan, Q.P.; Luo, Z.X. Genetic diversity of three classes of integrons in
antibiotic-resistant bacteria isolated from Jiulong River in southern China. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2015, 22,
11930–11939. [CrossRef]
Koczura, R.; Mokracka, J.; Jablonska, L.; Gozdecka, E.; Kubek, M.; Kaznowski, A. Antimicrobial resistance of
integron-harboring Escherichia coli isolates from clinical samples, wastewater treatment plant and river
water. Sci. Total Environ. 2012, 414, 680–685. [CrossRef]
Kotlarska, E.; Luczkiewicz, A.; Pisowacka, M.; Burzynski, A. Antibiotic resistance and prevalence of class 1
and 2 integrons in Escherichia coli isolated from two wastewater treatment plants, and their receiving waters
(Gulf of Gdansk, Baltic Sea, Poland). Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2015, 22, 2018–2030. [CrossRef]
Escudero, J.A.; Loot, C.; Mazel, D. Integrons as adaptive devices. In Molecular Mechanisms of Microbial
Evolution; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2018; pp. 199–239.
Karkman, A.; Parnanen, K.; Larsson, D.G.J. Fecal pollution can explain antibiotic resistance gene abundances
in anthropogenically impacted environments. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10. [CrossRef]
Li, L.G.; Yin, X.L.; Zhang, T. Tracking antibiotic resistance gene pollution from different sources using
machine-learning classification. Microbiome 2018, 6. [CrossRef]
Oravcova, V.; Mihalcin, M.; Zakova, J.; Pospisilova, L.; Masarikova, M.; Literak, I. Vancomycin-resistant
enterococci with vanA gene in treated municipal wastewater and their association with human hospital
strains. Sci. Total Environ. 2017, 609, 633–643. [CrossRef]
Roberts, M.C. Acquired tetracycline and/or macrolide-lincosamides-streptogramin resistance in anaerobes.
Anaerobe 2003, 9, 63–69. [CrossRef]
Volkers, G.; Damas, J.M.; Palm, G.J.; Panjikar, S.; Soares, C.M.; Hinrichs, W. Putative dioxygen-binding
sites and recognition of tigecycline and minocycline in the tetracycline-degrading monooxygenase TetX.
Acta Cryst. D Biol. Crystallogr. 2013, 69, 1758–1767. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Stachler, E.; Crank, K.; Bibby, K. Co-occurrence of crAssphage with antibiotic resistance genes in an impacted
urban watershed. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. 2019, 6, 216–221. [CrossRef]
Giebultowicz, J.; Tyski, S.; Wolinowska, R.; Grzybowska, W.; Zareba, T.; Drobniewska, A.; Wroczynski, P.;
Nalecz-Jawecki, G. Occurrence of antimicrobial agents, drug-resistant bacteria, and genes in the
sewage-impacted Vistula River (Poland). Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2018, 25, 5788–5807. [CrossRef]
[PubMed]
Tennstedt, T.; Szczepanowski, R.; Braun, S.; Puhler, A.; Schluter, A. Occurrence of integron-associated
resistance gene cassettes located on antibiotic resistance plasmids isolated from a wastewater treatment
plant. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2003, 45, 239–252. [CrossRef]
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 7137
81.
82.
14 of 14
Kinzelman, J.; Anan’eva, T.; Mudd, D. Evaluation of Rapid Bacteriological Analytical Methods for Use as Fecal
Indicators of Beach Contamination. Report prepared for. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Science and
Technology. Region 5 Water Division, EPA Contract #EP-11-5-000072; EPA: Washington, DC, USA, 2013.
Sivaganesan, M.; Aw, T.G.; Briggs, S.; Dreelin, E.; Asian, A.; Dorevitch, S.; Shrestha, A.; Isaacs, N.; Kinzelman, J.;
Kleinheinz, G.; et al. Standardized data quality acceptance criteria for a rapid Escherichia coli qPCR method
(Draft Method C) for water quality monitoring at recreational beaches. Water Res. 2019, 156, 456–464.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access
article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution
(CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).