❉✉r❤❛♠ ❘❡s❡❛r❝❤ ❖♥❧✐♥❡
❉❡♣♦s✐t❡❞ ✐♥ ❉❘❖✿
✵✽ ❙❡♣t❡♠❜❡r ✷✵✶✺
❱❡rs✐♦♥ ♦❢ ❛tt❛❝❤❡❞ ✜❧❡✿
❆❝❝❡♣t❡❞ ❱❡rs✐♦♥
P❡❡r✲r❡✈✐❡✇ st❛t✉s ♦❢ ❛tt❛❝❤❡❞ ✜❧❡✿
P❡❡r✲r❡✈✐❡✇❡❞
❈✐t❛t✐♦♥ ❢♦r ♣✉❜❧✐s❤❡❞ ✐t❡♠✿
❙❡♥② ❑❛♥✱ ❑✳❆✳ ❛♥❞ ❆♣✐ts❛✱ ❙✳▼✳ ❛♥❞ ❆❞❡❣❜✐t❡✱ ❊✳ ✭✷✵✶✺✮ ✬❆❢r✐❝❛♥ ♠❛♥❛❣❡♠❡♥t ✿ ❝♦♥❝❡♣t✱ ❝♦♥t❡♥t ❛♥❞
✉s❛❜✐❧✐t②✳✬✱ ❙♦❝✐❡t② ❛♥❞ ❜✉s✐♥❡ss r❡✈✐❡✇✳✱ ✶✵ ✭✸✮✳ ♣♣✳ ✷✺✽✲✷✼✾✳
❋✉rt❤❡r ✐♥❢♦r♠❛t✐♦♥ ♦♥ ♣✉❜❧✐s❤❡r✬s ✇❡❜s✐t❡✿
❤tt♣✿✴✴❞①✳❞♦✐✳♦r❣✴✶✵✳✶✶✵✽✴❙❇❘✲✵✽✲✷✵✶✺✲✵✵✸✻
P✉❜❧✐s❤❡r✬s ❝♦♣②r✐❣❤t st❛t❡♠❡♥t✿
❚❤✐s ❛rt✐❝❧❡ ✐s
❝
❊♠❡r❛❧❞ ●r♦✉♣ P✉❜❧✐s❤✐♥❣ ❛♥❞ ♣❡r♠✐ss✐♦♥ ❤❛s ❜❡❡♥ ❣r❛♥t❡❞ ❢♦r t❤✐s ✈❡rs✐♦♥ t♦ ❛♣♣❡❛r ❤❡r❡
❤tt♣✿✴✴❞r♦✳❞✉r✳❛❝✳✉❦✴✶✻✸✹✵✴✳ ❊♠❡r❛❧❞ ❞♦❡s ♥♦t ❣r❛♥t ♣❡r♠✐ss✐♦♥ ❢♦r t❤✐s ❛rt✐❝❧❡ t♦ ❜❡ ❢✉rt❤❡r ❝♦♣✐❡❞✴❞✐str✐❜✉t❡❞ ♦r
❤♦st❡❞ ❡❧s❡✇❤❡r❡ ✇✐t❤♦✉t t❤❡ ❡①♣r❡ss ♣❡r♠✐ss✐♦♥ ❢r♦♠ ❊♠❡r❛❧❞ ●r♦✉♣ P✉❜❧✐s❤✐♥❣ ▲✐♠✐t❡❞✳
❯s❡ ♣♦❧✐❝②
❚❤❡ ❢✉❧❧✲t❡①t ♠❛② ❜❡ ✉s❡❞ ❛♥❞✴♦r r❡♣r♦❞✉❝❡❞✱ ❛♥❞ ❣✐✈❡♥ t♦ t❤✐r❞ ♣❛rt✐❡s ✐♥ ❛♥② ❢♦r♠❛t ♦r ♠❡❞✐✉♠✱ ✇✐t❤♦✉t ♣r✐♦r ♣❡r♠✐ss✐♦♥ ♦r ❝❤❛r❣❡✱ ❢♦r
♣❡rs♦♥❛❧ r❡s❡❛r❝❤ ♦r st✉❞②✱ ❡❞✉❝❛t✐♦♥❛❧✱ ♦r ♥♦t✲❢♦r✲♣r♦✜t ♣✉r♣♦s❡s ♣r♦✈✐❞❡❞ t❤❛t✿
• ❛ ❢✉❧❧ ❜✐❜❧✐♦❣r❛♣❤✐❝ r❡❢❡r❡♥❝❡ ✐s ♠❛❞❡ t♦ t❤❡ ♦r✐❣✐♥❛❧ s♦✉r❝❡
• ❛ ❧✐♥❦ ✐s ♠❛❞❡ t♦ t❤❡ ♠❡t❛❞❛t❛ r❡❝♦r❞ ✐♥ ❉❘❖
• t❤❡ ❢✉❧❧✲t❡①t ✐s ♥♦t ❝❤❛♥❣❡❞ ✐♥ ❛♥② ✇❛②
❚❤❡ ❢✉❧❧✲t❡①t ♠✉st ♥♦t ❜❡ s♦❧❞ ✐♥ ❛♥② ❢♦r♠❛t ♦r ♠❡❞✐✉♠ ✇✐t❤♦✉t t❤❡ ❢♦r♠❛❧ ♣❡r♠✐ss✐♦♥ ♦❢ t❤❡ ❝♦♣②r✐❣❤t ❤♦❧❞❡rs✳
P❧❡❛s❡ ❝♦♥s✉❧t t❤❡ ❢✉❧❧ ❉❘❖ ♣♦❧✐❝② ❢♦r ❢✉rt❤❡r ❞❡t❛✐❧s✳
❉✉r❤❛♠ ❯♥✐✈❡rs✐t② ▲✐❜r❛r②✱ ❙t♦❝❦t♦♥ ❘♦❛❞✱ ❉✉r❤❛♠ ❉❍✶ ✸▲❨✱ ❯♥✐t❡❞ ❑✐♥❣❞♦♠
❚❡❧ ✿ ✰✹✹ ✭✵✮✶✾✶ ✸✸✹ ✸✵✹✷ ⑤ ❋❛① ✿ ✰✹✹ ✭✵✮✶✾✶ ✸✸✹ ✷✾✼✶
❤tt♣✿✴✴❞r♦✳❞✉r✳❛❝✳✉❦
“African Management”: Concept, Content and Usability
Anderson Konan SENY KAN
Suzanne Marie APITSA
Emmanuel ADEGBITE
Université de Toulouse - Toulouse
Business School
20, bd Lascrosses - BP 7010 - 31068
Toulouse Cedex 7
Tel : +33 (0)5.61.29.47.40
Fax : +33 (0)5.61.29.49.94
Email : ka.seny-kan@tbseducation.fr
Universitré du Havre
25, rue Phlippe Le Bon 76600
Le Havre Cedex
Tel : +33 (0)6 71 12 06 21
Durham University Business
School, Stockton-on-Tees TS17
6BH.
Tel: +44 (0) 191 3345902
Fax: +44 (0) 191 334014
Email :
emmanuel.adegbite@durham.ac.uk
Email : suzanne.apitsa@orange.fr
Abstract
Purpose – While management research in the African context is not very visible in the extant
management literature, there is a piecemeal corpus of literature that has arisen in response to
the exclusion and marginalisation of Africa in the broad field of management scholarship. The
idea underlying this reasoning is that the Western management model prevailing so far in
Africa is inadequate because of cultural considerations. However, what is meant by “African
management” still remains unfamiliar to both researchers and practitioners, both in Africa and
outside.
Design/methodology/approach – The authors conduct a selective review of the fragmented
“African management” literature to identify its direction. The paper questions how “African
management” research scattered in the literature can be consolidated in a single
comprehensive frame.
Findings – The paper identifies the key elements underlying the “African management”
narrative. It also articulates these elements within a frame which represents an unprecedented
attempt to render advocacy of “African management” more insightful and useful in global
management scholarship.
Originality/value – The vibrant economic trends of Africa and its forthcoming dynamics are
on the spotlight. At the same time, this upturn raises again a central concern about African
societies’ development in which organizations are expected to play a pivotal role. Yet the
paucity and fragmented nature of the current state of African management research do not
enable either practitioners or academia to get a deep understanding of African organizations.
This article constitutes a major contribution by identifying the analytical parameters that
really count in African organizations.
Keywords African management, African Thought,
Paper type General review
1
Introduction
From the analysis of all the most informed observers, Africa is experiencing unprecedented
growth period. Some trends testify to changes experienced on the continent. For example, the
recently published Ibrahim Index (2014) points out that the institutional governance of fiftyfour African countries has improved continuously since the 2000s. McKinsey Global Institute
(MGI) meanwhile expects a doubling of macroeconomic indicators of Africa's development
and urge international companies to take a look at the opportunities in the continent (MGI,
2010). Walsh (2015) indicates that in the recent years, Africa as a whole has even surpassed
the rest of the world in terms of economic growth. For example, between 2004 and 2013,
African countries (including 52 out of the 54) had achieved a growth rate of 4.99%. Africa is
now seen for its potential wealth in terms business opportunities (MGI, 2010; McKinsey &
Company, 2012; Chironga et al., 2011; The Economist, 2011, 2013; The Independent, 2013;
Walsh, 2015). Major players in the media industry have even developed programs relaying
the economic and entrepreneurial dynamics of Africa. This is the case for Bloomberg with a
programme like Africa Business Weekly or CNN with Inside Africa.
Carmody (2011) somewhat nuances this enthusiasm indicating that if this economic
context is favorable for the whole of Africa, it specifically benefit Sub-Saharan Africa1 which
is more engage in a changing global economy. A recent study published by the Wall Street
Journal shows that among the top ten African economies attracting the attention of 200
European and American multinationals, nine are in the sub-Saharan part of the continent
(Wall Street Journal, 2014). If this economic dynamic which aims to contribute to the
economic takeoff of African countries is extensively studied through the prism of a variety of
disciplines (sociology, history, anthropology, politics, etc.), organizations which are the real
economic engines are still the subject of highly rare and fragmentary studies in management
(e.g., Kamdem, 2000; Nkomo, 2011; Wren and Bedelian, 2009; Zoogah et al, 2015a).
However, as Nkomo (2011) stresses that the quality of knowledge of African management is
essential to the development of most African countries. Accordingly, following Kamdem
(2000), we consider that it is necessary to build a coherent and comprehensive understanding
of the management of African organizations.
This paper contributes to the literature on ''African management'' by providing a critical
review of its fundamental constituents and the links they may have. Indeed, considering that
companies have a major societal role to play in transforming African states, the theoretical
1
In this article Africa will designate sub-Saharan Africa.
2
and managerial implications of our study contribute to a better understanding of how African
organizations function.
Our study also contributes to a wider debate in which authors like Boyacigiller and Adler
(1991) invite our management researchers to study management systems outside the most
prevalent models. In particular, Walsh (2015) argues that researchers have poor knowledge
about the management African organizations. This article is an attempt to feel this gap by
examining the basic components of the ''African management'' (e.g., Hatchuel, 2005). We
intend to produce the elements of accessibility to action models that govern the functioning of
African organizations. Such objective has a threefold reason that justifies its urgency
(Theimann et al., 2006). First, African managers think they have sacrificed their authenticity
in managing African organizations through an unsuccessful adoption of Western ideals.
Second, the absence of African systems of thought in the international literature in
management is increasingly criticized. Finally, owing to the growth of international business
and globalization, there is awareness that Africa could be the world growth driver whose
domestic markets are fairly constrained.
This cognizance then revives a debate in favor of the recognition of an ''African
management'' from which, for instance, has emerged the idea of an African capitalism called
"africapitalism" advocated by the Nigerian banker, economist and philanthropist, Tony O.
Elumelu (Amaeshi, 2013a, b; Elumelu, 2015; Amaeshi and Idemudia, 2015). Thus, as the
reference to the '' African management 'is increasingly evoked by managers and academics, it
is timely to contribute to its promotion by identifying what it refers to, examining its
dynamics in order to disentangle its main concepts and narratives.
Our article is structured as follows. First, we position management research on African
organizations as compared to the generic analytical perspectives of organizations. Thereafter,
we define a framework used as guideline to examine the usability of ''African management''.
We present our results that show that how "African management" emerges as an act of
resistance to the dominant literature in management. The African system of thought is
mobilized as a means of (re) appropriation of African authenticity. However, the difficulty to
unravel ''African management'' is that it is inherently subject to multiple influences. Despite
this difficulty, ''African management'', although being spread in a piecemeal fashion, reveals
two forms of actionability which give it the ability to be put into practice. Finally, we discuss
the implications of our results in terms of research methodology, public policy and
management education systems.
3
Overview on organizations' analysis and African management issues
Reviewing the organization involves the distinction of its main features (Kamdem, 2000). The
organization is singularised by the institutionalization of the division of labor, power and
communication responsibilities. It is also marked by the presence of decision centers
exercising a function of control and guidance upon the activities of its members. Finally, the
organization is characterized by the mobility of its members. This mobility is itself a function
of organizational objectives and individual skills of its members. These three characteristics
of the organization determine its objects of analysis.
Figure 1 traces the evolution of the central objects of the analysis of the organization
according to five different investigation perspectives. From its rationalist and functionalist to
humanist and culturalist conceptions, the organization has gradually become both a material
and symbolic object. The former analysis suggests the organization have failed to consider the
human aspects in a productive system. The organization is then gradually perceived as an
object that is not only material but above all symbolic.
These generic analysis perspective of the organization structure suggest that the
management research on African organizations emerged belatedly in comparison with
international research (e.g., Kamdem, 2000; Nizet and Pichault, 2007; Oghojofor et al., 2012).
In particular, on the one hand the rationalist and functionalist perspectives and on the other
hand humanist and culturalist feed the bulk of management research on African organizations.
(Kamdem, 2000).
4
Figure 1 : Generic perspective of the analysis of the organization
Rationalist and
Neo-rationalist and
functionalist
reformist
Mainstream
Mainstream
Mainstream
Mainstream
Mainstream
Analysis of blue-collar
Analysis of decision-
Systemic analysis of the
Analysis of social
Analysis of human
work at the workshop
Analysis of manager's
administrative work
making
Descriptive analysis of
the manager’s work
Organist and systemic
Actionalist and strategic
Humanist and
culturalist
organization
Socio-technical analysis
of the organization
movements
Strategic analysis of
power
relations at the
workplace
Intercultural analysis of
the organization
Analysis of
Analysis of
administrative
organizational culture
bureaucracy
Psychodynamic
Analysis of the
organization
Central Object
Central Object
Central Object
Central Object
Central Object
The formalization as an
The characterization of
The determination of the
The design of the
The recognition of the
essential process of the
the decision and the
relationship between on
organization as
relativity and complexity
organization. This
central role of the
the one hand the
determined by issues of
of Human at the
involves the valuation of
manager in this process
organization and its
power and the actors'
workplace.
environment and on the
game of power. The
Therefore, the
the technical nature of the
5
work organization and the
other hand, the
organization is also seen
organization can be
identification of key
organization and the
as a reflection of the
understood by the
organizational functions
Human
society
emotional and affective
traits of its members.
Gradual consideration of a social dimension to the materialistic design of the organization
Source : Based on Kamdem (2000)
6
Within the first perspective, it is the assessment of the instrumentation of the administrative
bureaucracy that attracts the attention of researchers. The studies conclude that the
administrative bureaucracy resulted in a dysfunctional organizational system in Africa. The
failure of African organizations overwhelmingly pointed out in the literature emphasizes the
needs of identification of the success or failure factors of African economies.
It is in this context that the second perspective - humanist and culturalist - is mobilized
aiming at taking into account cultural considerations within African organizational
environment. This second perspective takes three main directions depending on how culture is
integrated in the analysis (Kamdem, 2000). First, African culture has been regarded as a key
factor in the failure of African organizations. This in turn would explain the delay of African
economies (Easterly and Levine, 1997). This ethnocentric reasoning is justified by the idea
that due to an "economy of affection" (e.g., Hyden, 2006), characterizing Africa, which
opposes to a productivist economy, African culture should deserve greater account (Kamdem,
2000). Second, a more reflective approach enabled a renewal of the way to take into account
African culture in the analysis of African organizations. It is now considered that there is no
need for African culture to adapt to the African administrative bureaucracy. Rather, managers
have to understand what Africa has as the most dynamic is its culture. A third response to the
failure of African organizations is to seek a paradigm that can help understand and integrate
African cultural traits. Unlike the first two perspectives, this third response is attempting to
understand the conjunction modalities of African traditions and Western modernity in the
formation of an African productive economy (e.g., Bourgoin, 1980, D’Iribarne, 2003; Henry,
1991; Kamdem, 1996; Mutabazi, 2006).
It therefore appears a strong desire to defend a distinctive identity in ''African
management''. But this attempt is fraught with difficulties including one that deserves to be
highlighted. (e. g., Kamdem, 2000 ; Zoogah and Nkomo, 2012). Indeed, it is important to note
that almost all of the small proportion of studies focusing on African organizations is mainly
subject to a Western prism of organizational analysis. In fact, most of current knowledge on
the management of African organizations is centered on the theoretical corpus test that by
definition obscures the very identity of the ''African management''. Kamdem (2000) concludes
that the loosely conceptualization of the organization as an object of study may be questioned.
In line with Kamdem's (2000), we contend that the ''African management'' as an object of
study is still poorly conceptualized. There is therefore a need to build a framework to better
understand the main components of the ''African management'' (e.g., Jackson, 2013 ; Walsh,
2015 ; Zoogah et al. 2015a).
7
Setting the framework of the analysis
Hatchuel (2005) discusses the usefulness of management research in general and revives
debate on how researchers and managers access management knowledge. This reflection also
makes sense in the case of African management which is still largely confined in Africa and
strongly dependent on the English-language production originating mainly from South Africa
(e.g., Ahiauzu, 1986; Amoako-Agyei, 2009; Choudhury, 1986; Jackson, 2011, 2012, 2013;
Jones, 1896; Nkomo, 2011; Nzelibe, 1986 ; Zoogah and Nkomo, 2012)2. Therefore, the socalled African management is not very diffuse for it is mainly published in journals and / or
books with a limited audience and an access difficulty. It is true that since the 90s, African
management research gets an international attention (Zoogah et al., 2015a). But that is also
where another problem lies: that of the poor accessibility of African academic institutions to
international research resources. Hence, it is the question of how African management
literature can be mobilized and valued in academic circles as well as in African organizations.
We contribute to this debate by borrowing, from the information science literature, the
concept of usability (Koohang, 2009) to examine the contribution of research on African
management to the understanding on how African organizations function. The usability refers
to the ability of a system to effectively meet the needs of individuals. Indeed, it may be
difficult for managers to understand the notion of African management what may encompass.
Hence, it is important to elucidate the African management in terms of its currency, relevance
(organizational and personal relevance) and actionability (e. g., Bailey and Clarke, 2000,
2001).
In other words, the usability of African management can be attained under the three
following conditions. First, African management must contain knowledge that can be
connected to what really matters to organizational processes (currency). Second, it must be
linked to organizational values and individual objectives and interests (organizational and
personal relevance). Third, the African management knowledge must be actionable in the
sense that the managers can to put it into practice in their decision-making process (e. g.,
Bailey and Clarke, 2000). Hereafter, we detail each of those three conditions.
The currency refers to a knowledge portfolio intended to face major organizational issues
such as strategy, business processes, change management and performance (e.g., Gray and
Meister, 2004, 2006; Hansen and Von Oetinger, 2001 ; Rulke et al., 2000). Thus, the currency
2
Actually, the top-five most prolific African nations in economics and business research are respectively South
Africa, Kenya, Ethiopia, Nigeria and Tunisia (Nkomo, 2015).
8
of African management should allow a new understanding or at least a better understanding of
these four critical organizational issues. In other words, managers must be able to refer to
African management as important enough for analyzing organizational situations.
In terms of relevance, African management must reflect individuals' decision-making
accuracy within their organizations (e. g., Hernes, 2014; Jaworski, 2011, Rich, 1977, 1997).
This means that managers must be able to take advantage in using knowledge claimed in
African management literature. From this point of view, managers' motivation is key to
grasping the fundamental managerial activities including generation, communication and
exploitation of knowledge. The use of African management in the conduct of these three
activities demonstrates its relevance. Therefore, African management attains certain relevance
when one can demonstrate the interest it arouses among managers. Beyond its organizational
and societal benefits, African management must also allow managers to derive personal
benefits. In this case, African management will allow managers’ efficiency in achieving their
goals.
The relevance is achieved when the managers in all his/her managerial activities can
glimpse the improvement of his / her efficiency through the use African management
knowledge. The managers may not perceive such an individual benefit unless he/she manages
to clearly identify the contents of this African management. In other words, the managers
must perceive African Management as part of a set of actions available to him / her in
connection with the performance of his managerial activities. The debate on the African
management may appear somewhat enigmatic if it is not in line with managerial practices
within African organizations. Examining the relevance of African management thus entails
the understanding of how knowledge that emerges from the African management literature
addresses the problems encountered by African organizations. For Hernes (2014), discussing
the relevance of management research is to admit that managerial work is localized,
embedded, and function of time.
Finally, the actionable character of African management refers to the idea that managers
can use it when they face some opportunities in exercising their managerial activities
(McGahan, 2007; Pearce and Huang, 2012). Actionable means here that the knowledge
generated through the African management literature can be converted into usable ideas. The
actionability of African management does not mean that academic knowledge should be more
pragmatic. However, the actionability of knowledge depends greatly on its execution
conditions (e.g., Hatchuel, 2005). Bailey and Clarke (2000), for isnstance, propose to consider
knowledge as a set of usable ideas. Their suggestion requires a distinction between data,
9
information and knowledge. Data becomes information only when put in context. The
information in turn becomes knowledge when it is of interest to a potential user at a given
point in time. This implies that to be actionable, African management must be practical given
the actual capabilities of the managers.
According to Pearce and Huang (2012) management research can be actionable in three
ways. Management research can be symbolically actionable if it purports to legitimize
managers' bias or preferred actions. It can also be instrumentally actionable when research
results are used to solve a specific practical problem. This form of actionability reflects the
idea that management research influences managers' actions. Finally, management research
can help managers to have a conceptual understanding of a management phenomenon. This
latter form of use of management knowledge has not produced an immediate application in
managers' course of actions. For Pearce and Huang (2012) the instrumental and conceptual
usage of management research render it the most actionable.
From this framework, we analyze the articles dealing with ''African management''. Thus,
our study contributes by presenting a systematic review of management research on African
organizations (e.g., Nkomo, 2011; Zoogah, 2008; Zoogah and Nkomo, 2012). Our study is
although complementary to existing contributions, but differs widely. Indeed, previous studies
offer a critical review of management studies focusing on the African context. In particular,
Nkomo (2011) highlights the tensions and contradictions of this literature. Zoogha (2008),
Zoogah and Nkomo (2012) analyze the trend of management research on African
organizations. For us, we present a critical review of the concept of ''African management' 'in
the management literature.
On the currency of ‘’African management”: What really counts?
''African management" is part of a general reasoning having a dual objective: emancipation
and resistance to domination of the Western world through western managerial precepts.
Jackson (2014) emphasizes that ''control '' and '' resistance '' form a central duality in African
management literature. African management thus reflects a resistance posture which is at the
heart of an issue of power between the dominant and the dominated (e.g., Bhabha, 1994; Said,
1978/1995; Spivak, 1988) in which the dominated must develop analytical frameworks
helping them to take a stand.
10
Resistance to the extant dominant management literature
The claim of an African management is not an isolated phenomenon in the management
literature. We situate this quest in a general context of questioning the Universalist
pretensions of the Western management precepts. This general context that reflects a kind of
desire for emancipation has resulted in a stream of research called "Global South" (Alcadipani
et al., 2012). The term "Global South" refers to the idea that current knowledge on the
management of organizations of the southern countries - developing or emerging countries are largely produced with the lenses of western premises.
Better still; the knowledge that emerges from southern countries seems to be ignored by
the proponents of Western perspectives. Some pioneering studies had already pointed this
form of marginalization (e.g., Blunt, 1986; Blunt and Jones, 1997; Dia, 1996; Kiggundu,
1991; Nzelibe, 1986). Thus, under the banner - "Global South", the authors severely criticize
the hegemony of Western perspectives in management research (Zoogah and Nkomo, 2012).
The "Global South" in this respect represents a form of resistance to the dominant Western
literature in management. It is the opportunity to propose how the ways of all the southern
countries, the dominated, may partake in creating knowledge on southern organizations.
While ''Global South'' is aiming at reaching a form of authenticity in management
knowledge about Southern organizations, there is at the same time a recognition of the
convertible nature of Western management assumptions. Hernandez (2007) thus advocates
that the management is by nature an adaptive object. This is consistent with the idea that the
organization itself is a social object of perpetual transformations at structures, procedures and
individuals levels (Kamdem, 2000).
Within this general context, African management is at the crossroads of three major
intellectual postures that feed a wider debate on intercultural questions in management
(Anakwe, 2002; Horwitz et al., 2002; Jackson et al., 2013; Kamoche et al. 2012; Theimann et
al., 2006). A first perspective, contending a convergence, argues that the economic ideology
leads cultural values so that Western management methods will result, ultimately, in the
adoption of Western values by Africans. In contrast to this convergence viewpoint, a second
thesis advocates a divergence. It is considered that culture is deeply rooted in a context and
that it promotes values beyond a mere economic ideology. Accordingly, management
practices are culturally situated. Thus, the adoption of Western management practices by
Africans will not be able to subjugate African values. The third posture rather claims a
crossvergence. The crossvergence invites to consider the possibility of a mixture of values
11
when several cultures meet. Indeed, local culture influences the meaning, interpretation and
implementation of Western management practices. At the same time, the confrontation of
Western management to local culture helps the development of a hybridity in African
management practices. (Sartorius, 2011; Ward et al., 1999).
Despite the differences between these three perspectives, they have in common an idea that
a link between cultural characteristics and management of organizations does exist. Indeed, a
sense of common identity among actors within organizations can manifest through their
agreements on several topics related to the management of organizations (Theimann et al.,
2006). This may be the current state of the attributes of managing organizations. It may also
be the question of what can be considered ideal in terms of management style or
organizational factors such as hierarchy, decision-making and control. Finally, it may be how
management situations considered ideal change over time.
Three ideal types of organizational management in Africa can be identified (Jackson, 2002;
2004; Jackson et al., 2013). We distinguish between the postcolonial management systems
focused primarily on control, post-instrument systems centered upon individuals and results
and the African renaissance systems focused on stakeholders. The postcolonial management
is a legacy of colonization (Claeyé and Jackson, 2012; Jackson, 2012; Joy and Poonamallee,
2013; Nkomo, 2011). This first management style is based on a fundamental assumption of
mistrust towards human nature. This induces a need to impose control within organizations.
This management style unfortunately inhibits the creative capacity of organizations. It is a
style of management that recognizes employees have a restricted skill set primarily rewarded
in a pecuniary manner. This postcolonial management cannot be focused on results but be
influenced by the logic of bureaucratic control mechanisms.
The second management style, the post-instrumental, is the result of the mission of African
development that western actors have set themselves (Jackson, 2002). Western actors consider
that Africa could look like the Western developed countries by adopting management
methods imported through their multinationals and their development agencies. Importing
Western management precepts also involves the training of African actual and future
managers under Western leadership.
The third type of management acts as a rejection of Western ideals contained in the first
two management ideal types (Bolden and Kirk, 2009; McFarlin, 1999; Nzelibe, 1986;
Walumbwa et al., 2011; West, 2006). It is the ultimate form of expression of the desire for
emancipation and resistance to domination contained in the first two ideal types. The African
renaissance management style puts more emphasis on commitment towards stakeholders and
12
adopts an humanistic logic. It purports to reconnect African cultural principles which are
basically communal to the functioning of organizations. Indeed, as Ntuli (2002) mentions, the
logic underlying the African renaissance is that of a reappropriation of culture (s), religion (s),
and African values in the research on Africa's development.
African thought-system as mean of resistance
Michalopoulos and Papaioannou (2015) show that the strength of pre-colonial African
institutions continues to shape the functioning of African organizations. African renaissance
research connect with this perspective. This suggests that the current research on the
management of African organizations seems to have mistaken the investigation focus. This
then involves a better understanding of the African system of thought in order to scrutinize the
relationship between African values and the functioning of African organizations. (e.g.,
Ahiauzu, 1986; Nkomo, 2011; Nzelibe, 1986). Indeed, unlike the Western system of thought,
the African thought conceives life as a cycle (Ntuli, 2002). In this African thought, the world
is an interconnected reality composed of human beings, plants and animals in which the
survival of each entity depends on how all entities interact. In African societies, the beginning
and the end of life are connected to a world of myths. These myths take shape through rituals.
Rituals are effective through acts of worship (dances, sculptures, etc.) that mark the
milestones of life: birth, initiation, marriage, death. This African thought is based on
complementarity between the individual and the community to ensure the place of the human
in the grand scheme of things.
What also determines the difference between Western thinking and African thought is
based on the principles underlying learning styles and knowledge development (Theimann et
al., 2006). While Western principles are based on a scholastic approach, in Africa they are
based on a humanistic approach. The scholastic approach addresses the knowledge in two
essential ways that maintain conflicting reports. Knowledge is the result of a factual
understanding of objects like logic, science, etc. Yet, it can also be the result of a
metaphysical questioning of the nature of reality. The humanistic approach based modes of
learning and knowledge development in African societies is itself rooted in the rituals, history,
cultural practices, symbolism and myths. This principle considers the human being as the
starting point for any human action. It is based on a fundamental premise which states that
human beings have themselves the capacity for truth and good. It is the reappropriation of that
13
human being that represents the main aim of the African Renaissance based management
proponents. (e.g., Ntuli, 2002).
The system of thought is shaped in culture (Amoako-Agyei, 2009; Chen, 2014; Grzeda and
Assogbavi, 1999; Nzelibe, 1986; Walumbwa et al., 2011) and culture is built outside of the
organization (Kamdem, 2000). Nevertheless, organisational members are both individuals
from the workplace but also individuals outside the organization (Theimann et al., 2006).
Therefore, the question is how to ensure that the workplace integrates external elements
which profoundly distinguish individuals. Actually, the African system of thought reflects a
communal sociability (Kamdem, 2000). This sociability has an essential feature which is that
of being both intra and inter-communal, and the family is identified as the fundamental
socializing unit (e.g. Ntuli, 2002; Kamdem, 2000). The family is the basic unit of a clan. A
clan is a unit of the nation. The communal sociability takes shape through these units and is
structured around the four points (Ntuli, 2002).
First, a central place is given to the interrelationships and interdependencies between the
human, nature, the spiritual entities and ancestors. Then the family as the basic unit of society
is assigned a role of preserving life. The family as an institution is involved in all important
milestones of human life to ensure that during times of crises, conflict resolution takes place
as harmoniously as possible. The family provides a form of mentoring to its members.
Finally, the communal sociability is based on two cohesion and harmony institutions. One is
related to secret societies - the secret is particularly valued in African societies. And the other
is based on the councils of elders3.
Diversity is another characteristic element of culture in Africa. The ethnicity constitutes an
important dimension (Michalopoulos and Papaioannou, 2015; Nyambegera, 2002). Africa
societies are by essence multicultural where ethnicity is an essential source of sociological
attachment. The Sub-Saharan Africa has in fact more than 500 ethnic groups who speak more
than 1000 languages and dialects (Kamoche, 2002; Seriki et al., 2010). Ethnic group serves as
basic reference for self-identification. In this context, ethnicity can be understood as the use
and mobilization of the identity or ethnic difference to take advantage of situations of
competition, conflict and cooperation. If the ethnic group is just a cultural trait by which
individuals are identified and identify themselves, ethnicity is a instrumentation of belonging
to an ethnic group that may positively or negatively affect managerial practices (Kamoche,
3
Mutabazi (2007) describes the experience of the implementation of this type of council of elders in a subsidiary
of a multinational based in Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo. This institution is so important that Seny
Kan (2013) proposes to integrate it as a coordinating governance mechanism both at national and organizational
level in the African contexts.
14
2002; Michalopoulos and Papaioannou, 2015; Nyambegera, 2002; Seriki et al., 2010). The
salience of ethnicity as a central element of diversity in Africa imposes inclusive managerial
practices (Nyambegera, 2002) and especially as the ceaseless socio-political changes question
the justice and accountability in African organizations (Beugré, 2002).
''African management" is the object of ideological postures of which ideal types of
management style can be distinguished. The African system of thought is purposely mobilized
in the literature on African management as an essential tool for an emancipation and a
resistance attitude. This African thought system is based on a communal sociability and an
ethnic identification. In short, the challenge of the debate on the African management lies in
examining the conciliation conditions of productive efficiency of organizations and the
managerial implication of African system of thought (Kamdem, 2000). In this perspective,
what is driving the African management research through the African Renaissance aims to
build the foundations of the relationship between the individual outside the organization - in
its cultural cement - and the individual at the workplace.
Objectives and Interests at stake
The management of African organizations is under a diverse influence that generates
conflicting dynamics. Therefore, the inclusion of societal values is presented as a way to
balance the productive goals of organizations and the preservation of the communal harmony
of African societies.
Conflicting global-local dynamics
The global-local dynamics constitutes a major issue in the African management because
management in African countries is subject to a variety of external and internal influences:
multinationals, development agencies and local companies (Mitiku and Wallace, 1999). The
rush of emerging countries in Africa reinforces the external influences (Horwitz, 2012;
Jackson, 2012; Jackson et al., 2013). The development of the African management is thus at
the crossroads of a variety of influences which can be a source of great emulations or
otherwise real challenges. The challenges are, among others, related to the improvement of
the organization's strategy, organizational processes, change management and performance
(e.g., Mitiku and Wallace, 1999; Nizet and Pichaut, 2007; Zoogah et al., 2015a).
15
In general, current research suggests that the ''global-local ''conflicting dynamics are due to
the lack of incorporation of African cultural values into African organization analysis. For
Mutabazi (2008) this creates misunderstandings within African organizations on issues such
as time management; retribution; relationship to the others; the organizational environment
and the uncertainty. The mismatch between Western management models and african cultural
traits is often pointed out. The socio-cultural traits often considered common to African
societies are structured around social links and the perception of the role of individuals in
society (Muchiri, 2011). Social ties are woven within groups structured according to the
family and ethnic affinities. Under these conditions, an individual perceives its role as that of
looking after the interests of the group he belongs to.
Furthermore, the perception of an individual is under the influence of the other members of
his / her group of his / her ability to protect them. The relationship to the groups maintains
personal sacrifices values to the benefit of members of the groups. This results in paternalistic
management systems oriented patrimonial behavior characterized by ad hoc organizational
arrangements and hence by irregular arrangements (Hernandez, 2000, 2007). Ces systèmes de
management peuvent conduire à une concentration de l’autorité décisionnelle. Les acteurs
développant ainsi des espaces discrétionnaires qui peuvent remettre en cause les règles et
procédures organisationnelles. Social ties and the place of the individual within these links
determine the accumulation of social capital by actors (Khayesi and George, 2011) and
practices and actions (Nkomo and Kriek, 2011).
Aligning and balancing the stakes
For Muchiri (2011) the success of African organizations is related to an alignment of their
systems, styles and practices to their local cultural contexts. This effort has resulted in several
African management models such as the paternalistic model (Hernandez, 2000, 2007),
circulatory model (Mutabazi, 2006, 2007) and the participatory model (Prinsloo 2000).
Because of social ties and the relationship to others mentioned above, Hernandez (2000,
2007) proposes an African management model based on social relations. This model is based
on the idea that the production function is not limited only to the commonly admitted factors:
"labor" and "capital." A third factor called "C" (for Cooperation, Community, and
Collaboration) must be considered. In this model it is the accumulation of this "C" factor that
helps to align and balance the Western productive goals of organizations and social cohesion
16
in African societies. A company is no longer a mere nexus of contracts but a real social
community. In this way, social community existing outside the organization is incorporated
into the workplace (Hernandez, 2000; Prinsloo, 2000).
For Mutabazi (2006, 2007) beyond the diversity that characterises African societies,
common cultural traits forming a coherent system of beliefs, values and sociability rules can
be foundIn particular, rooted in parenthood, social ties are the subject of four types of
circulation between and within community which form the Mutabzi's circulatory model. First,
thanks to the social ties based on principles of solidarity and mutual assistance, the flow of
goods takes place through a dynamic of "gifts" / "counter-giftsAll members of a group should
contribute to these exchanges by right and duty. Thus, the circulation of individuals is
determined by their ability to networking. Second, the vast network of solidarity that emerges
encourages the pooling of resources which is the vector of the flow of human energy. Third,
there is the circulation of power based on age. Age gives indeed the legitimacy of exercising
power. But the legitimacy of an "elder" can be challenged if he / she does not contribute
ethically to other forms of circulation. Fourth, information flows within and between groups
with the ultimate aim of ensuring that people's behavior is consistent with three other
circulations.
Claims and thoughts into action
Two forms of actionability seem to emerge from the current state of the literature on African
management. On the one hand, we distinguish a conceptual actionability whose purpose is to
demonstrate the indigeneity of the management of African organizations. Indeed, the
identification of typical traits of the African management facilitates the resistance narrative to
the dominant management models. On the other hand, some of the distinctive features of
African management are subject to an instrumental actionability whose purpose is to solve
particular managerial problems.
Conceptual actionability: re-writing and re-interpreting prior knowledge
The re-writing and re-interpretation of the knowledge on African organization management
requires the identification the key concepts of the African management. Yet the indigeneity
African organizations and the distinctive nature of the ''African management'' remain elusive
due to a lack of convincing conceptualization (Jackson, 2013). There is no way to go around
17
this problem. The solution lies on designation identifying key concepts and / or characteristic
elements of the ''African management''.
The concept of ''Ubuntu'' appears to be the most visible Afrocentric concept the literature
on ''African Management''. (Prinsloo, 2000; Seny Kan, and Apitsa, 2014; Karsten and Illa,
2005; Lutz, 2009; Mangaliso, 2001; Mbigi, 1997; Mbigi and Maree, 1995; NewenhamKahindi, 2009; West, 2014). The ''Ubuntu'' is an expression in the Bantu language of South
Africa that reflects the communal nature of African countries. This concept is a boundary
marker that helps distinguish African societies - less individualistic and more communal from
Western societies - more individualistic and less communal. Thus the ''Ubuntu'' crystallizes
the idea of a communal perspective of the company (Lutz, 2009). From an analytical point of
view, ''Ubuntu'' is built on the distinctive features of African communal societies including
ethics, interdependence, the human spirit and totality (Prinsloo 2000). Although the concept is
widespread in the literature on ''African management'' it may be questioned on several points
(West, 2014).
First, the concept is poorly documented empirically. Consequently, the generalization of
the concept to the whole of sub-Saharan Africa may be unfounded. Second, all its distinctive
elements are not unique to African societies. Third, the ''Ubuntu'' is presented with a form of
idealism that exposes only the positive aspects of African social norms (e.g., Chen, 2014;
Kragh, 2012). Despite its shortcomings, the concept of 'Ubuntu' still allows better
investigation of the social nature of managerial practices in African organizations. (e.g.,
Amoako-Agyei, 2009; Chen, 2014; Khan and Ackers, 2004).
The re-writing and re-interpretation of knowledge on African management is also carry out
by means of the development of theoretical models. For example, McFarlin et al. (1999)
proposes in the context of South Africa a model of Africanization of the management of
South African organizations. For these authors the Africanization allows the attainment of
four organizational purposes: great equity among employees; high productivity; strong
loyalty; and better organizational citizenship. Kamoche and Harvey (2006) re-examine the
issue of knowledge transfer within multinational's African subsidiaries. They suggest an
afrocentric model of the success of knowledge transfer. Zoogah et al. (2015a) for their part
propose a model explaining the effectiveness of African organizations. Grzeda and Assogbavi
(1999) discuss the cultural dimensions that influence the productivity of African
organizations. Other studies emphasize the political dimension and the local institutional
context of the development of the African Management (e.g., Ferguson et al., 2010; Horwitz
et al., 2002). Finally, the re-interpretation of knowledge on African management highlights
18
the hybridity that African organizations are subjected (Jackson et al., 2013; Kamoche, 2011;
Nkomo, 2011).
Instrumental actionability: tackling specific African managerial issues
The most commmon form of usability in the literature on African management is the
conceptual actionability. However, instrumental actionability is increasingly carries out
providing empirical based knowledge on the characteristic elements of the ''African
management''. For instance, Michalopoulos and Papaioannou (2015) highlight several factors
that explain the persistence of ethnicity, the characteristic element of the diversity of African
societies.
Each ethnic group is often a specific linguistic group. This strengthens intra-group
relations while limiting the inter-group communication. Individuals share the risk more easily
within an ethnic group than between ethnic groups. Fragmentation and ethnic identity are
compounded by income differences between ethnic groups and the opposition on the national
political scene. Finally, the colonial history of Africa has strengthened and / or even creates
ethnic identities. For these reasons, Michalopoulos and Papaioannou (2015) come to the
conclusion that ethnicity is a key factor to consider in the analysis of the performance of
African organizations. In this same vein, Rivera-Santos et al. (2015) show that social
entrepreneurship and the choice of the social mission activities are determined by ethnic
considerations. Diversity does not only have positive aspects, however, its negative aspects
can be channeled in a positive way in the organization (Seriki et al., 2013). Nkomo and Kriek
(2011) even show that promoting diversity helps managers to deal with organizational related
issues such as change management.
Due to various influences, management of African organizations is the subject of hybridity
of different forms. The hybridity in African organizations may be due to the influence of
companies from emerging market investing in Africa (Horwitz, 2012). Some studies
emphasize the dynamic of the hybridization within African organizations (Anakwe, 2002;
Claeyé and Jackson, 2012; Jackson et al., 2008; Kamoche and Newenham-Kahindi, 2009;
Price and van der Walt, 2013; Sartorius, 2011). The dynamic of the hybridization is
experienced within multinationals (Kamoche and Newenham-Kahindi, 2009; Sartorius, 2011)
as well as in SMEs (Jackson et al., 2008) or in NGOs (Claeyé and Jackson, 2012).
Newenham-Kahindi (2009) also shows that hybridization does not emerge only from the
North-South relationship, but also from South-South relations, particularly among African
19
countries. The empirical evidence of hybridization of management practices in African
organizations seems to confirm the crossvergence thesis.
The argument of the African renaissance, that is to say the reappropriation of African
values in the organizational environment is also the subject of an instrumental actionability. In
particular, Bolden and Kirk (2009) show that Africans have an inclusive and participatory
conception of leadership based on communal principles. This is an example of a study that
shows how to integrate African values into organizational practices. West (2006) also shows
how the African renaissance can help to address the incompatibility between Western
mangement models and African values. Wanasika et al. (2011) empirically demonstrate that
managerial implications the Afrocentric concept ''Ubuntu'' are common to different African
countries (i.e., Nigeria, Namibia, Zambia, Zimbabwe and South Africa).
Discussion and conclusion: ‘’African management’’, between
unfulfilled attempt and upcoming challenges
The appearance of the concept of "African management" in management research marks a
greater willingness than a simple opposition to the dominant management research tradition.
Beyond the idea of resisting what was previously legitimized as a universal management
knowledge (Nkomo, 2015), the "African management" aims to reveal the denied identity of
the management of African organizations. This study thus shows that the discourse on
"African management" is not a mere re-examination of the issue of contextualization of
management research in the African context. It is more about the development of an African
management theory of African organizations, that is to say, a theory about the context (e.g.,
Bamberger, 2008) participating in a generation Afrocentric knowledge of African
organizations (Holtbrügge, 2013 ; Lutz, 2009). This attempt, laudable as it is, remains
unfulfilled because the academic production on the "African management" is not sufficiently
abundant to form a coherent body of knowledge (e.g., Nkomo, 2015). Nevertheless, the
review we have carried through our analytical framework based on the usability of the
"African management" contributes to the literature on several points (e.g., Bailey and Clarke,
2000, 2001 ; Koohang, 2009; Pearce and Huang, 2012).
The management research on African organizations is part of three major intellectual
postures: convergence, divergence and crossvergence. The discourse on "African
20
management" seems to oppose to the convergence thesis of cultural values led through
managerial activities and rather seems to oscillate between the thesis of the divergence and
that of the crossvergence. Indeed, (re) reading African organizations through the prism of the
African system of thought is to admit the situated and contextual nature of organizational
process. In this sense the "African management" supports the view of the divergence and
corresponds to the ideal type of the African renaissance management. Yet, Nkomo (2011)
stresses that the African Renaissance contains itself the same contradictions and tensions
reproached to the alleged dominant literature management. The "African management" is a
form of rewriting of Africa. The paradox is that this resisting act perpetuates the binary
oppositions and hierarchies it denounces. The "African management" somehow falls into the
trap of essentialism it tries to correct.
Impregnated with the logic of the African Renaissance, the "African management" is
aiming at the understanding of organizational practices through the African system of thought.
In practice, achieving this goal could be a little bit tricky for reasons similar to those already
advanced in the general literature on management research in Africa (e.g., Hernandez and
Kamdem, 2007 ; Nkomo, 2011, 2015 ; Safavi, 1981). Indeed, from a methodological point of
view several criticisms can be put forward. In the current state of the literature, the "African
management" is more the object of theoretical reflections than empirical studies. Moreover, it
appears a homogenization tendency of values that characterize the African system of thought
while Africa remains a culturally diverse continent (e.g., Kiggundu, 1991). For Nkomo (2011)
there is an illusion of the cultural uniqueness in the rhetoric of the "African management"
that does not encourage the discovery of the variety and complexity of management processes
at work within African organizations. Several ways exist to capture this complexity. Bolden
and Kirk (2009) points out that a better way to build an Afrocentric management knowledge
on African organizations can be the use of a constructivist approach. For Walumbwa et al.
(2011) a multidisciplinary approach combining historical, philosophical, economic and sociopolitical perspectives may be considered. Nkomo (2015) refers to such a notion of
transdisciplinarity as "decolonial approach".
Another difficulty related to the resisting work underlying "African management"
discourse is that of its conditions of emergence and dissemination. Indeed, the diffusion of
academic knowledge quality is under the control of Western institutions (e.g., Nkomo, 2015).
In reality the existing conditions the "African management" are highly dependent on
dissemination tools of the scientific production of Western academics. It is as if the dominated
cannot emancipate itself without the backing of the dominant. This could undermine the
21
usability of the "African management" that we have exposed in this article. Indeed, the
"African management" may appear as a mere publishing opportunity for academics much
more concerned about their career progression than the examination the organizational issues
faced by managers of African organizations.
Enhancing the usability of the "African management" while solving the aforementioned
problems questions of wider discussions on the development of management education in
Africa which actually is influenced by a multitude of public and private institutions, local and
international (Kiggundu, 1991). Better yet, this multiple influence operates according to the
areas of influence of the former colonizers (Hernandez and Kamdem, 2007). The challenge
raised by this situation is related to the systemic nature of the solution to elaborate. Such a
solution has to be designed in order to put management education systems at the service of the
development of african countries (e.g., Abdulai, 2014 ; Nkomo, 2015).
This article supplements prior studies focusing on state of the art of management research
on African organizations. (e.g., Zoogah et al., 2015a ; Zoogah and Nkomo, 2012). Here we
develop a distinctive approach on the very notion of "African Management" This article
adresses an obvious need to disentangle tools for understanding the ''African management " as
research object. The reflection we conduct helps define access conditions to the modes of
action which govern the management of African organizations.
22
References
Ahiauzu, A. I. (1986) « The African Thought-System and the Work Behavior of the African
Industrial Man», International Studies of Management & Organization, 16(2): 37-58
Alcadipani, R., Khan, F. R., Gantman, E., & Nkomo, S. (2012). Southern voices in
management and organization knowledge. Organization, 19(2), 131-143.
Amaeshi, K. (2013a, July 13). Africapitalism: A philosophy for sustainable business in
Africa? Guardian, UK. Accessed March 05, 2015, from
http://www.theguardian.com/sustainable-business/africapitalism-philosophy-sustainablebusiness-africa
Amaeshi, K. (2013b, October 02). Africapitalism: Unleashing the power of emotions for
Africa’s Development? African Arguments of the Royal African Society (UK). Accessed
March 05, 2015, from http://africanarguments.org/2013/10/02/africapitalism-unleashingthe-power-of-emotions-for-africas-development-by-kenneth-amaeshi/
Amaeshi, K. & Idemudia, U. (2015) Africapitalism: A Management Idea for Business in
Africa? African Journal of Management 1(2): 210-223
Amoako-Agyei, E. (2009) « Cross-Cultural Management and Organizational Behavior in
Africa. » Thunderbird International Business Review, 51(4): 329-339
Apitsa, S. M. (2013, September). L'hybridation des pratiques de GRH à l'international par le
truchement de l'ethnicité en Afrique. In Annales des Mines-Gérer et comprendre (Vol. 113,
No. 3, pp. 51-61). ESKA.
Apitsa, S. M., & Amine, A. (2014). L'ethnicité, un levier d'action pertinent du management
interculturel des ressources humaines?. Management & Avenir,70(4), 13-31.
Bailey C. and Clarke, M. (2000) "How do managers use knowledge about knowledge management?",
Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 4 Iss: 3, pp. 235 – 243.
Bailey, C., and Clarke, M. (2001). Managing knowledge for personal and organisational
benefit. Journal of Knowledge Management, 5(1), 58-68.
Bhabha, H. K. (1994). The location of Culture. New York: Routledge.
Beugré, C. D. (2002). Understanding organizational justice and its impact on managing
employees: An African perspective. International Journal of Human Resource
Management, 13(7), 1091-1104.
Blunt, P. (1986). Techno-and Ethnocentrism in Organizational Studies: Comment and
Speculation Prompted by Ronen and Shenkar. Academy of Management Review, 11(4),
857-859.
23
Blunt, P., & Jones, M. L. (1997). Exploring the limits of Western leadership theory in East
Asia and Africa. Personnel Review, 26(1/2), 6-23.
Boyacigiller, N. A., & Adler, N. J. (1991). The parochial dinosaur: Organizational science in
a global context. Academy of Management Review, 16, 262–290.
Bourgoin, H. (1984). L’Afrique malade du management, Paris, Editions Jean Picollec.
Carmody, P. (2011). The new scramble for Africa. Cambridge: Polity
Chironga, M., Leke, A, Lund, S., & van Wamelen, A. (2011). Cracking the next growth
market: Africa. Harvard Business Review, 89(5), 117–123.
Choudhury A. M. (1986) « The Community Concept of Business: A Critique », International
Studies of Management & Organization, 16(2): 79-95
D’Iribarne, Ph. (2003), « Le Tiers-monde qui réussit, nouveaux modèles », Paris, Odile Jacob
Dia, M. (1996), « Africa’s Management in the 1990s and Beyond: Reconciling Indigenous
and Transplanted Institutions » The World Bank
Easterly W., Levine R. (1997), “Africa Growth Tragedy: Policies and ethnic divisions”,
Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol.112, N° 4, p. 1203-1250.
Gray, P. H., & Meister, D. B. (2004). Knowledge sourcing effectiveness.Management
Science, 50(6), 821-834.
Gray, P. H., & Meister, D. B. (2006). Knowledge sourcing methods. Information &
Management, 43(2), 142-156.
Greenwood, R., Hinings, C. R., & Whetten, D. (2014). Rethinking institutions and
organizations. Journal of Management Studies, 51(7), 1206–1220.
Hansen, M. T., & Von Oetinger, B. (2001). Introducing T-shaped managers. Knowledge
management's next generation. Harvard business review, 79(3), 106-16.
Hatchuel, A. (2005). Towards an epistemology of collective action: management research as a
responsive and actionable discipline. European Management Review, 2(1), 36-47.
Henry, A. (1991). Vers un modèle du management africain. Cahiers d'études africaines, 447473.
Hernandez, E.-M. (2000), « Afrique : l’actualité du modèle paternaliste », Revue Française de
Gestion, n°128, mars-avril-mai, pp.98-106.
Hernandez, E-M. (2007) « Entre tradition et modernité, proposition d’un modèle de
management Africain » Gestion 2000, Janvier-février 2007, pp.21-30.
Hernes, T. (2014). In search of a soul of relevance for European management
research. European Management Journal, 32(6), 852-857.
24
Hyden, G. (2006). African politics in comparative perspective. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge
University Press.
Ibrahim Index of African Governance (2014). A report available at:
http://www.moibrahimfoundation.org/iiag/ (accessed May 2, 2015).
Jackson, T. (2004) Management and Change in Africa: A Cross-Cultural Perspective,
London: Routledge.
Jackson, T. (2011) « From cultural values to cross-cultural interfaces: Hofstede goes to Africa
» Journal of Organizational Change Management, 24(4): 532-558
Jackson, T. (2012) « Postcolonialism and organizational knowledge in the wake of China's
presence in Africa: interrogating South-South relations » Organization, 19(2) 181–204
Jackson, T. (2013). Reconstructing the indigenous in African management
research. Management International Review, 53(1), 13-38.
Jones, M. (1988) « Managerial thinking: an African perspective. » Journal of Management
Studies, 25(5): 481-505
Jaworski, B. J. (2011). On managerial relevance. Journal of Marketing, 75(4), 211-224.
Khayesi, J. N. O., & George, G. (2011). When does the socio-cultural context matter?
Communal orientation and entrepreneurs’ resource accumulation efforts in Africa. Journal
of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 84, 471–492. doi:10.1111/j.20448325.2011.02029.x
Kamdem, E. (2014). Ni Taylor, ni folklore: pour un management africain interculturel et
créatif. Organizações & Sociedade, 3(6), 97-126.
Kamdem, E. (2000), « L’analyse des organisations en Afrique : un champ émergent » Revue
Africaine de sociologie, 4(2): 92-132.
Karsten, L., & Illa, H. (2005). Ubuntu as a Key African Management Concept.Journal of
Managerial Psychology, 20(7), 612.
Kiggundu, M. N. (1991) The Challenges of Management Development in Sub‐Saharan
Africa, Journal of Management Development, Vol. 10 Iss: 6, pp.32 - 47
Koohang, A. (2009). Expanding the concept of usability. In Gill, T. G. and Cohen E.
Foundations of informing science: 1999-2008. Informing Science Press. USA
Lutz, D. W. (2009). African Ubuntu philosophy and global management. Journal of Business
Ethics, 84(3), 313-328.
Mangaliso, M. P. (2001). Building competitive advantage from ubuntu: Management lessons
from South Africa. The Academy of Management Executive, 15(3), 23-33.
Martin, R. (2012). The price of actionability. Academy of Management Learning &
Education, 11(2), 293-299.
25
Mbigi, L. (1997), Ubuntu: The African Dream in Management, Knowledge Resources,
Randburg.
Mbigi, L. and Maree, J. (1995), Ubuntu: The Spirit of African Transformation Management,
Knowledge Resources, Randburg.
McGahan, A. 2007. Academic research that matters to managers: On zebras, dogs, lemmings,
hammers, and turnips. Academy of Management Journal, 50: 748 –753
McKinsey & Company. (2012). The rise of the African consumer. a press release from
McKinsey & Company website. available at:
http://www.mckinsey.com/insights/consumer_and_retail/the_rise_of_the_african_consume
r
McKinsey Global Institute (MGI), 2010. Lions on the move: The progress and potential of
African economies. A report available at:
http://www.mckinsey.com/insights/africa/lions_on_the_move
Michalopoulos, S., & Papaioannou, E. (2015). On the ethnic origins of African development:
Traditional chiefs and pre-colonial political centralization. Academy of Management
Perspectives, 29(1), 32-71.
Mutabazi, E. (2006), « Face à la diversité des cultures et des modes de gestion : le modèle
circulatoire de management en Afrique », Revue Management et Avenir, n°10, septembre,
p.179-197.
Mutabazi E.,. 2007. Vers une intégration des modèles africains et occidentaux in Nizet, J., and
Pichaut F (eds). Les performances des organisations africaines. Pratiques de gestion en
contexte incertain. L’Harmattan. Paris
Mutabazi, E. 2008 « Culture et gestion en Afrique noire : le modèle circulatoire », dans
Eduardo Davel, Jean-Pierre Dupuis, et Jean-François Chanlat (dir.), Gestion en contexte
interculturel : approches, problématiques, pratiques et plongées, Québec, Presses de
l’Université Laval et Télé-université (UQAM), 2008.
Newenham-Kahindi, A. (2009). The Transfer of Ubuntu and Indaba Business Models Abroad
A Case of South African Multinational Banks and Telecommunication Services in
Tanzania. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 9(1), 87-108.
Nizet, J., & Pichault, F. (2007). Les performances des organisations africaines. Pratiques de
gestion en contexte incertain. L'Harmattan, Paris
Nkomo, S. M. (2011). A postcolonial and anti-colonial reading of ‘African’leadership and
management in organization studies: Tensions, contradictions and possibilities.
Organization, 18(3), 365-386.
26
Nkomo, S. (2015). Challenges for Management and Business Education in a ''Developmental''
State: The Case of South Africa. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 14(2),
242–258.
Ntuli, P., P. (2002). Indigenious knowledge systems and the African renaissance. Chapter 4.
pp. 53-66. In Hoppers, C. A. O. (Ed.). Indigenous knowledge and the integration of
knowledge systems: Towards a philosophy of articulation. New Africa Books.
Nzelibe C. O. (1986) « The Evolution of African Management Thought » International
Studies of Management & Organization 16(2): 6–16
Pearce, J. L., & Huang, L. (2012). The decreasing value of our research to management
education. Academy of Management Learning & Education,11(2), 247-262.
Prinsloo, E. D. (2000). The African view of participatory business management. Journal of
Business Ethics, 25(4), 275-286.
Rich, R.F. (1977), “Use of social science information by federal bureaucrats: knowledge for
action versus knowledge for understanding”, in Weiss, C.H. (Ed.), Using Social Research
in Public Policy Making, Lexington Books, Toronto, pp. 183-198.
Rich, R.F. (1997), “Measuring knowledge utilization: processes and outcomes”, Knowledge
and Policy: The International Journal of Knowledge Transfer and Utilization, Vol. 10 No.
3, pp. 11-24.
Rulke, D. L., Zaheer, S., & Anderson, M. H. (2000). Sources of managers' knowledge of
organizational capabilities. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 82(1),
134-149.
Said, E. (1978/1995). Orientalism. London: Penguin.
Seny Kan K. A. (2013) « Des pistes de réflexion pour la construction d’un cadre structurant
des économies en développement : Apport de la recherche en gouvernance d’entreprise »
African Management Studies, 1(2), 1-37
Seny Kan, K. A. and Apitsa, S. M. (2014, September 19). Le management africain expliqué
aux néophytes. Harvard Business Review. A press release available at:
http://www.hbrfrance.fr/chroniques-experts/2014/09/3475-existe-t-il-un-mode-demanagement-africain/ (accessed May 2, 2015).
Spivak, G. C. (1988). Can the subaltern speak?. In C. Nelson & L. Grossberg (Eds.), Marxism
and the interpretation of culture (pp. 271–313). Basingstoke: Macmillan.
The Economist. (2011, December 3). The Hopeful Continent: Africa rising. A press release
available at: http://www.economist.com/node/21541015 (accessed May 2, 2015).
27
The Economist. (2013, April 6). Investing in Africa: The hottest frontier. A press release
available at: http://www.economist.com/news/finance-and-economics/21575769strategies-putting-money-work-fast-growing-continent-hottest (accessed May 2, 2015).
The Independent (2013, June 01). Africa is the final frontier for the bold and patient investor.
A press release available at: http://www.independent.co.uk/money/spend-save/africa-isthe-final-frontier-for-the-bold-and-patient-investor-8640579.html (accessed May 2, 2015).
Wall Street Journal (2014, June 06). Nigeria, Argentina and Vietnam Prove Top Picks for
Multinationals. A press release available at:
http://blogs.wsj.com/frontiers/2014/06/06/nigeria-argentina-and-vietnam-prove-top-picksfor-multinationals/ (accessed May 2, 2015).
Walsh, J. P. (2015). Organization and Management Scholarship in and for Africa… and the
World. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 29(1), 1-6.
West, A. (2014). Ubuntu and business ethics: problems, perspectives and prospects. Journal
of business Ethics, 121(1), 47-61.
Wren D. A., Bedelian A. G. (2009), The evolution of management thought, sixth edition, John
Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Zoogah, D. B. (2008). African business research: A review of studies published in the Journal
of African Business and a framework for enhancing future studies. Journal of African
Business, 9(1), 219-255.
Zoogah, D. B., and Nkomo, S. (2012) Management research in Africa: past, present, future. In
Lituchy, T., Punnett, B. J., & Puplampu, B. B. (Eds.) Management in Africa: Macro and
micro perspectives (pp. 9–31). Routledge.
Zoogah, D. B., Peng, M. W., & Woldu, H. (2015a). Institutions, resources, and organizational
effectiveness in Africa. Academy of Management Perspectives, 29(1), 7-31.
Zoogah, D., Peng, M., & Habte, W. (2015b). Linking management research and African
organizations: Institutions, cultures, and resources. Academy of Management Perspectives,
29(1), XX-XX.
28