Integrative Medicine as “Medicine”: A Perspective

Integrative Medicine Reports Volume 1.1, 2022 DOI: 10.1089/imr.2022.0054 Accepted April 14, 2022 Open camera or QR reader and scan code to access this article and other resources online. GUEST EDITORIAL Open Access Integrative Medicine as ‘‘Medicine’’: A Perspective Sanchari Mukhopadhyay, MD,1 Bharath Holla, MD, PhD,1 Hemant Bhargav, MD, PhD,1,* Kishore Kumar Ramakrishna, MD, PhD,1 Umesh Chikkanna, MD,1 Shivarama Varambally, MD, DSc,1 and Bangalore N. Gangadhar, MD, DSc2 Abstract With the advent and acceptance of biological medicine, now called as modern biomedicine (or allopathy), the older regional medical systems were categorized as complementary and alternative medicine (CAM). Recently, the term CAM has been replaced with ‘‘integrative medicine.’’ This viewpoint manuscript focuses on the essential connotation of such terms and clarifies the debates on the several confusing terminologies hampering its actual conceptualization and leading to the ‘‘othering’’ phenomenon in health care approaches. Integrative medicine, in its essence, is a form of holistic and evidence-based health care approach that includes but is not limited to medical treatment. A closer look at the current management protocols of most noncommunicable diseases, such as diabetes mellitus, hypertension, obesity, pain syndromes, and psychiatric illnesses reveals that it incorporates relevant evidence-based management of all health care domains, along with mainstream pharmacologic and surgical treatment options. These management approaches point toward an already existing integration in the mainstream medical practice. Simultaneous management of all the dimensions of health and illness by expanding the current sphere of integration will ultimately result in comprehensive patient care. Therefore, we conclude that integrative medicine is essentially an application of different ‘‘culturally sensitive’’ health care approaches, optimally tailored to a given patient’s needs and difficulties. Efforts are needed at the clinical, research, and administrative levels to reduce the ‘‘othering’’ phenomenon seen in health care approaches that are often detrimental to efficient patient care. There is a need to promote collaboration between different disciplines and generate evidence base to optimize integrative medical practice further. Establishing interdisciplinary departments of integrative medicine at mainstream medical institutions may be the first step in this direction. Keywords: integrative medicine; complementary medicine; alternative medicine; mainstream medicine 1 Department of Integrative Medicine, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India. Medical Assessment and Rating Board, National Medical Commission (NMC), India. 2 *Address correspondence to: Hemant Bhargav, MBBS, MD, PhD, Department of Integrative Medicine, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Hosur Main Road, Bengaluru, Karnataka 560029, India, Email: drbhargav.nimhans@gmail.com ª Sanchari Mukhopadhyay et al., 2022; Published by Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. This Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons License [CC-BY] (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 86 Mukhopadhyay, et al.; Integrative Medicine Reports 2022, 1.1 http://online.liebertpub.com/doi/10.1089/imr.2022.0054 Preamble History of medical care can be traced back to ancient times all over the world.1 Historically, there was an era when diseases were considered to be caused by evil spirits entering the body. Witchcraft, black magic, trepanation, mummy powder therapy, and so on were tried as treatments for the same.2 Later, medical systems based on concepts of health and illnesses evolved. Ancient medical practices considered human bodily structure and functions and their abnormalities in a holistic way. Ancient India, Greece, Egypt, Rome, Arabia, Persia (now Iran), China, Africa, Australia, and South America all practiced their own forms of traditional medicines as evidenced from several inscriptions.3 Gradually modifications and sophistication were introduced in the previously chronicled methods of medical management; surgical treatment being an example. With improvement in the knowledge of human anatomy, germ theory of infectious diseases, trauma management and the like, medical practice was constantly updated and improved. The 19th and 20th centuries saw the advent of specific biologic treatments, radiologic imaging techniques, development of chemical, molecular, and genetic laboratory investigation techniques, and further novel areas for scientific research, including both technology and medicine.1 The current mainstream medical practice (allopathy) is often denoted as biomedicine, and the other existing medical practices as complementary and alternative medicine (CAM).4 The use of CAM has been on the rise in the past few decades all over the world, with hospitals and care facilities often incorporating it into their management plans.4 The National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NCCAM) was established in 1998 under the National Institute of Health, United States in view of the wide use of CAM, which was unregulated until then.5 Recently its name has been changed to the National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH).6 This denotes a change in the conceptualization of CAM as a comprehensive integrative health care practice. In this article, we shall delve deeper into the concept of integrative medicine and try to answer a pertinent but yet-unanswered question, ‘‘What is, and what is not, integrated medical care?’’ Nomenclature: Clarification of Concept and debates Integrative medicine has been known by several names, including CAM, holistic medicine, traditional 87 medicine, and region-specific names such as oriental medicine or Indian systems of medicine, mind–body medicine, functional medicine, to name a few. The definition of CAM as given by the former NCCAM is that it refers to ‘‘a group of diverse medical and health care systems, practices, and products that are not presently considered to be part of conventional medicine.’’4,7 Ernst et al. defined CAM as ‘‘diagnosis, treatment and/or prevention which complements mainstream medicine by contributing to a common whole, by satisfying a demand not met by orthodoxy or by diversifying the conceptual frameworks of medicine.’’8 These descriptive definitions have been criticized due to their inability to clearly explain the concept and attributes of CAM. Rees and Weil suggested that integrative medicine is not just a synonym for CAM, and that the connotation it has is much more extensive; integrative medicine focusses on overall health and healing rather than just disease and treatment.9 NCCIH also emphasizes on the concept of integrative health as a holistic approach to health and well-being, achieved by coordinated conjoint use of conventional and complementary medicines.10 It brings natural products (e.g., herbs, vitamins, minerals, and probiotics), mind and body practices (e.g., yoga including meditation, chiropractic manipulation, Tai Chi, qigong, and massage), and other health approaches (Ayurveda, Traditional Chinese Medicine [TCM], homeopathy, and naturopathy) under the rubric of complementary health approaches.10 The debate regarding the terminology is discussed in a qualitative study by Holmberg et al. from four perspectives, namely medical practice, research, public relations, and health care delivery. This study found integrative medicine to be a term well agreed-upon, conveying its role in medicine and health care.11 While an appropriate term plays an important role in elucidating the underlying concept, excessive focus on it may actually be counterproductive by narrowing the repertoire. Thus, it is important that we discard the technicalities of naming and stick to the core concept of integrative medicine as it stands now, as per the NCCIH. It is pertinent to mention in this study the salient points of the continued debate and conflict regarding integration of different medical systems and health approaches. They include safety concerns, lack of welldesigned efficacy studies, insufficient knowledge about drug–product interactions, lack of stringency in regulatory control over products leading to misuse, statistically significant bias in mainstream medicine journals against CAM, and conflict between research- and Mukhopadhyay, et al.; Integrative Medicine Reports 2022, 1.1 http://online.liebertpub.com/doi/10.1089/imr.2022.0054 clinical-based practice.12 In contrast, research in complementary health care approaches has increased and significant data exist on the benefit of certain practices in some illnesses.13–15 In the next section, we discuss the current evidence-based management protocols in some common physical and psychiatric illnesses. Evidence of Integration in Mainstream Medical Practice Across Categories and Dimensions Dimensions of health and wellness include physical, intellectual, emotional, social, vocational, financial, and environmental ones.16 A holistic health care management comprises management of all the dimensions, medical being one of them. An effective interdisciplinary collaboration is required for comprehensive health care provision.17 We argue that the current approach followed by mainstream medicine is also integrative in its essence. This can be illustrated in the current evidencebased management protocols of some important noncommunicable diseases discussed hereunder: 1. Diabetes mellitus (DM): The World Health Organization (WHO) report on management of DM states that proper diet and regular exercise are the backbones that need to be tailor-made for the patients. It has subdivided the management into nutritional, exercise, and pharmacologic domains. The drug treatment options include insulin, insulin secretagogues, insulin sensitizers, and a-glucosidase inhibitors. The goal of treatment is to control the plasma glucose and serum glycosylated hemoglobin levels and any associated morbidity. The report emphasizes that comprehensive diabetes care, however, is more than just plasma glucose management. It needs multidisciplinary collaboration to identify and manage the risk factors and complications also.18 Nutritional recommendations and exercise are well evidenced in the literature as effective primordial and primary prevention as well as management modalities for borderline to mild clinical illness. The American Diabetes Association (ADA) has given evidence-based recommendations for lifestyle management, including nutrition and physical activity.19 Broadly, they focus on timely evidence-based patient-centered management, both pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic. The 2021 revision of the ADA guidelines on standards of medical care in diabetes includes social and cost domains, with a focus of care improvement and health promotion in DM rather than only clinical management. 88 Comorbidity (e.g., obesity, cardiovascular illnesses, and dyslipidemia) management has been emphasized. Behavior change and well-being have also been recognized as important predictors of outcome.20 2. Hypertension: The mainstay of hypertension management includes antihypertensive medication and lifestyle modification. Standard treatment guidelines for hypertension by the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, the Government of India have recommended either of or combination of the different classes of antihypertensive medication (calcium channel blockers, diuretics, angiotensin receptor blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, beta-adrenergic blockers, and spironolactone) as required along with lifestyle modification.21 The 2020 International Society of Hypertension global practice guidelines also state that lifestyle modifications can prevent or delay hypertension onset. Lifestyle modification is considered as first-line treatment along with antihypertensives, whose effects are often enhanced with lifestyle modification. They include in the assessment the psychosocial history, history of depression, physical activity, diet, tobacco and alcohol consumption, in addition to the clinical history, examination, and laboratory investigations of hypertension and associated cardiovascular and other medical morbidities.22 Thus, careful examination of existing clinical recommnedations for management of most of the non-communicable diseases reveal that management is essentially integrative and holistic (includes all the dimensions of the healthcare).23 3. Obesity and metabolic syndrome: Obesity is on the rise globally, due to factors such as sedentary lifestyle and unhealthy diet. Obesity is determined by body mass index (BMI) as per the WHO guideline. A BMI of 25–29.9 kg/m2 is suggestive of overweight status and that above 30 of obesity. Obesity is a known risk factor for proinflammatory, prothrombotic states, and cardiometabolic diseases. A multidisciplinary combination of lifestyle-related, medical, and surgical management approaches as necessary is strongly advised.24 Metabolic syndrome consists of the clinical parameters of insulin resistance (impaired glucose tolerance, increased fasting plasma glucose, type 2 DM, and lowered insulin sensitivity), increased body weight (waist-to-hip ratio >0.90 in men and 0.85 in women), dyslipidemia (triglycerides Mukhopadhyay, et al.; Integrative Medicine Reports 2022, 1.1 http://online.liebertpub.com/doi/10.1089/imr.2022.0054 >150 mg/dL and/or high-density lipoprotein <35 mg/dL in men or <39 mg/dL in women), and deranged blood pressure (>140/90 mmHg). Although the etiopathology can be multiple (genetic factors, immune-metabolic dysregulations, lifestyle factors, psychiatric illness and care, and medical illness and care), metabolic syndrome is indicative of increased risk of cardiovascular morbidities and DM.22,25 The American Heart Association treatment goals encompass management of lifestyle risk factors, elevated blood pressure and plasma glucose, and prothrombotic state. In lifestyle modification, weight reduction, physical activities, and dietary management are considered beneficial in prevention in high-risk individuals, for example, those on second-generation antipsychotics.25,26 4. Migraine and low back pain (LBP): Migraine is a primary headache, contributing to almost 88% of headache-related disability in the world.27 The management comprises acute treatment and prophylaxis. The first-line treatments for acute migraine are mostly pharmacologic, including triptans, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), paracetamol, and caffeine-containing analgesics. Antiemetics such as metoclopramide and parenteral dexamethasone are considered useful adjunct with good evidence. In about 38% of patients with episodic migraine, prophylactic management is found useful.28 Antiepileptics (divalproex and topiramate), beta-blocker (propranolol and esmolol) are the usual first-line treatments. Atenolol, nadolol, amitriptyline, and venlafaxine are second line. Limited evidence exists for drugs such as nebivolol, bisoprolol, carbamazepine, gabapentin, fluoxetine, nicardipine, verapamil, nimodipine, and nifedipine. In addition to the pharmacotherapy, there is grade-B evidence for nonpharmacologic managements such as relaxation training, thermal biofeedback, and cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) in prophylaxis. Acupuncture has a grade-A evidence as a useful adjunct in migraine prophylaxis.28,29 Identification and management of environmental, behavioral, and dietary triggers of migraine are also recommended by the American Association of Family Physicians in preventive treatment.28 Massage, yoga, and aerobic exercises are also advocated as adjuncts to first-line treatments.30 89 LBP is a common musculoskeletal condition, with an age-standardized point prevalence of 7.5% as of 2017, causing significant disability.31 The management requires assessing for red flag signs such as cancer, immunosuppression, intravenous drug use, fever, incontinence, unexplained weight loss in history, and saddle anesthesia, motor weakness in lower extremity, reduction in anal sphincter tone, and neurologic deficits on physical examination.32 A careful evaluation of the causes and treatments thereof are recommended. Medical and psychiatric assessments are to be done simultaneously. For the various attributes of LBP, CBT, self-exercise, patient education, physical therapies such as ultrasound, heal/cold therapy, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, spinal manipulative therapy, bracing, acupuncture, massage, yoga, interlaminar injections, annuloplasty, and pain-relieving medications are recommended with various degrees of evidence.32 The American College of Physicians also advised noninvasive options such as acupuncture, massage, superficial heat, NSAID, skeletal muscle relaxant as first line for acute or subacute LBP. Multidisciplinary rehabilitation, exercise, Tai Chi, yoga, mindfulness-based stress reduction, relaxation, biofeedback (thermal and electromyography), CBT, and acupuncture are recommended for chronic cases. Yoga is among the options that the American College of Physicians recommends for first-line treatment of chronic LBP.33 In patients with chronic LBP not responding to nonpharmacologic management, NSAID can be given as first-line medicine, and tramadol or duloxetine as second line. Opioids are advocated for use only in very limited cases with insufficient response to other treatments, after weighing for risk and benefit.34 Role of appropriate psychosocial interventions is also emphasized in these guidelines. 5. Depression: Depression is a serious mental illness (SMI), characterized by persistent pervasive sadness of mood, anhedonia, bleak or pessimistic views about future and the world, excessive or inappropriate guilt, recurrent thoughts of death or suicidality, and altered sleep, appetite, and sexual interest.35 The evidence-based first-line treatment for depression is either pharmacotherapy or psychotherapy depending on the severity and patient preference. The pharmacologic treatment options include selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, Mukhopadhyay, et al.; Integrative Medicine Reports 2022, 1.1 http://online.liebertpub.com/doi/10.1089/imr.2022.0054 serotonin and noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors, tricyclic antidepressants, and other newer agents such as mirtazapine, bupropion, trazodone, nefazodone, and agomelatine. Among the psychotherapies, good evidence exists for self-help, CBT, behavioral activation, interpersonal therapy, and others such as problem-solving therapy, psychodynamic psychotherapy, behavioral couples therapy, marital therapy, and family therapy. Physical activities are also mentioned in cases of mild to moderate depression.36,37 The American Psychiatric Association (APA) guidelines for management of major depression mention acupuncture, folate, S-adenosyl methionine (SAMe), St. John’s wort, and light therapy as potential treatment options.37 Both National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) and APA guidelines incorporate assessment and management of psychosocial factors and comorbidities along with the primary treatment of depression.36,37 6. Schizophrenia: Schizophrenia is another SMI, characterized by hallucinations, delusions, negative symptoms, disorganization of speech and behavior, catatonic symptoms, and significant decline in socio-occupational and biologic functions.38 The first-line management is with antipsychotics, firstgeneration (e.g., haloperidol, fluphenazine, and chlorpromazine) or second-generation (e.g., olanzapine, risperidone, aripiprazole, quetiapine, ziprasidone, and amisulpride), depending on the patient profile, tolerability, and preference.39,40 However, the management does not stop at reduction of the positive symptoms. Patients may often have deficits in general and social cognition, general wellbeing, quality of life, and may have persistent negative symptoms, leading to disability.41 Comorbidities are high in schizophrenia patients. These comorbidities may be due to the illness itself or medications. Lifestyle modifications and drug therapy are recommended to manage them.39,40 A successful rehabilitation plan is needed for a comprehensive management of schizophrenia. The Schizophrenia Patient Outcomes Research Team found benefits of psychotherapeutic techniques such as social skill therapy, supported employment, CBT, assertive community treatment, token economy, family therapy, and psychosocial interventions for substance use and weight reduction.42 The NICE guidelines in 2014 included yoga as one of the complementary approaches in schizophrenia due to 90 its demonstrated benefit in reducing negative symptoms and improving social cognition.43 Thus, although the acute treatment of schizophrenia is essentially pharmacologic, long-term management includes psychosocial, environmental, and physical domains. Some of the major noncommunicable disorders causing significant global disease burden are mentioned in this study. The list, however, is not exhaustive. There are other conditions, such as Parkinson’s disease, dementias, motor neuron disease, multiple sclerosis, and cardiovascular and cerebrovascular illnesses that contribute to considerable morbidity and mortality. In the standard treatment guidelines of these illnesses, the management approach recommended is patientcentered and holistic, catering to all the dimensions of health, including medical care. Where Does Integration Lie? From the aforementioned discussion, it is noticeable that integration of different health care approaches is carried out all over the world without giving it a particular name. Lifestyle management in form of diet and physical exercise forms an integral part of almost all the preventive and treating mainstream medicine protocols, as mentioned earlier. Yoga, Tai Chi, qigong, acupuncture, and other mind–body practices are often recommended as add-on to medical treatment. In psychiatry, the role of comprehensive management is widely seen in chronic SMIs, wherein medical, psychiatric, psychological, occupational, social, environmental, financial domains are included in the long-term plan. Thus, careful examination of existing clinical recommnedations for management of most of the non-communicable diseases reveal that management is essentially integrative and holistic (includes all the dimensions of the healthcare). Other Systems of Medicine and Integrative Approach: Expanding the Scope Physical exercise, dietary regulation, and to some extent yoga have already been incorporated in standard medical practice at present. However, these are not the only forms of treatment available across the world. TCMs include acupuncture, cupping, moxibustion, massage, herbal medicines, and mind–body practices such as Tai Chi and qigong. The therapeutic goal of TCM is to correct the disease-causing Mukhopadhyay, et al.; Integrative Medicine Reports 2022, 1.1 http://online.liebertpub.com/doi/10.1089/imr.2022.0054 imbalance of the opposing life forces (Yin and Yang) and enhance vitality.44 Similarly, traditional Indian medicines such as Ayurveda, Siddha, and Unani focus on the treatment of a disease and promotion of well-being in a holistic manner, taking into account the personal attributes of each patient. The therapeutic goals include enhancing longevity and rejuvenating the body, besides treatment of the disease.45 Many other forms of treatment are available worldwide, such as herbal remedies from different geographical areas, reflexology, chiropractic, spinal manipulation, massage, and relaxation techniques.46 Yoga is known to improve depression, anxiety, autonomic hyperactivity, and promote mindfulness and acceptance, and scientific studies on yoga have been on the rise.47 Similarly, there are Ayurvedic herbal formulations such as ashwagandha (Withania somnifera), brahmi (Bacopa monnieri), which are shown to have beneficial effects in cognitive impairment and dementia, depression, anxiety, schizophrenia, Parkinson’s disease, ataxia, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, attentiondeficit/hyperactivity disorder, and so on.48,49 The active phytoconstituents of these herbs have been analyzed. Mechanistic pathways for action have also been proposed and that includes inflammatory, immune, oxidative, and endocrine, causing adaptogenic effects. 50,51 TCM has also been demonstrated to act at molecular, biochemical network, tissue, and organ levels.52 Nutritional supplements such as folic acid, SAMe, curcumin, St. John’s wort, omega-3 fatty acids, vitamin E, and vitamin B are well studied in terms of effects, side effects, contraindications, and dosage, and are prescribed in conventional clinical settings. Essentially, all the traditional systems of medicine follow an inclusive approach in diagnosing and managing medical conditions. The concept of holism is evident in the ancient texts, including Charaka Samhita (Shareera Sthana, 1st Chapter, 86th Shloka) and Sushruta Samhita (Sutra Sthana, 4th Chapter, 7th Shloka) from India. There is evidence of holistic practices all across the world with similar basic principles modified by indigenous properties.53 Thus, there is a vast scope of expanding the current medical practices to incorporate the evidence-based traditional medicines. For example, an integrated system of health care exists in Cameroon, Central Africa, in collaboration with WHO, and is considered to have some role in improving health care access and treatment gap in the face of poverty and other socioenvironmental disadvantages.54 91 Stumbling Blocks in Conceptualization and Application The conceptualization of all the current medical practices as essentially integrative practices stumbles on the confusion regarding the nomenclature. Owing to the varied, inconsistent, and stigmatized naming of the other modes of treatment, the fundamental understanding is often lost. This next problem is the lack of knowledge among professionals. Owing to strict separation of medical and paramedical training, a professional trained in one form of health care often has minimal or no understanding of the other forms. This invariably leads to disapproval of the other management approaches as well as narrowing the range of health care delivery. Belief systems of both the practitioners and patients may be responsible for creating the dichotomy and poor acceptance of an integrative medical care. Another pertinent issue is the lack of well-designed studies to establish the efficacy and safety of several CAM modalities. Although there is an increase in research work in yoga, Ayurveda, and Siddha in the past few decades, the evidence is still not robust for all clinical conditions. Wholesome integration gets jeopardized because of lack of methodologically sound data on mechanisms of action, safety, and drug–product interactions. TCM also encounters similar problems, although research is being carried out on toxicologic analysis, dose–toxicity relationships, and drug interactions. Similar large-scale research is required for the other traditional therapies as well. Other obstacles to realization of integration include unethical practices and unscientific propagation by untrained professionals, thereby reducing acceptance in the scientific community and raising doubt regarding their validity. What Is Not Integrative Medicine? As noted in the earlier discussion, integrative medicine is the inclusive medical practice of all modalities of evidence-based treatment. However, there are several treatment practices that, although globally followed, do not have sufficient evidence for efficacy and safety. Reiki is one such example whose efficacy is not established for the conditions studied such as depression, anxiety, and pain.55 Another instance may be herbs such as Yohimbe, cinnamon, Cat’s claw, dandelion, to name a few.46 Yohimbe is widely used in the Central and Western Africa for Mukhopadhyay, et al.; Integrative Medicine Reports 2022, 1.1 http://online.liebertpub.com/doi/10.1089/imr.2022.0054 erectile dysfunction, but it has a significant number of adverse effects such as seizure, tachycardia, and other cardiovascular morbidities. In view of the possible benefit but definitive risk, Yohimbe is not recommended as a dietary supplement. Cinnamon, although investigated for DM and irritable bowel syndrome, has not been found unequivocally effective. Besides these examples, it is pertinent to mention that not all treatment modalities among the traditional systems are thoroughly investigated for safety and efficacy. Thus, it is important to emphasize that integrative medicine, as it should be practiced and conceived, involves the amalgamation of only the treatment procedures whose safety and efficacy are acceptable. Conclusion and Future Directions To summarize the discussion, we can say that health care, practiced properly, is integrative medicine, integrating more than one principle of treatment. As emphasized in this article, patient-centered health care is the call of the hour across disciplines. A holistic health care management includes management of all the dimensions of health and well-being, including but not limited to medical treatment. Integrative medicine is essentially an application of different health care approaches, optimally tailored to a given patient’s needs and difficulties. All the modalities may not be needed in every patient and thus, customizing the health care to the individual profile will make the health care delivery truly patient centered. From the current scenario of working in silos, there is a need to incorporate approaches that are more inclusive. To achieve the same, the stumbling blocks need to be removed by strengthening scientific researchbased evidence for all forms of management, improving awareness in the population regarding benefits and adverse effects of all medical practices. Educating the professionals of different disciplines on the fundamentals of different systems of medicine, mind–body practices, nutritional supplements, and advocating collaborative treatment practice by bringing all the professionals together and encouraging interdisciplinary dialogue will be conducive to the proper evolution of integrative medicine. Efforts at institutional, national, regional, and international levels in this direction will establish a comprehensive health care beyond the puzzling, inconsistent, and meaningless trivia of nomenclature, and will pave the way toward establishing the integrative health 92 care approach as the mainstream management offered by the state or national health systems. Establishing such interdisciplinary departments of integrative medicine at mainstream medical institutions may be the first step in this direction. Acknowledgments Authors thank the Ministry of AYUSH, Government of India for funding the Center of Excellence in AYUSH Research at the National Institute of Mental Health Neurosciences, Bengaluru, India. The Wellcome Trust/Department of Biotechnology (DBT) India Alliance supports H.B. and S.V., respectively, with early and intermediate career fellowships for research in integrative medicine. Author Disclosure Statement H.B. is on the editorial board of Integrative Medicine Reports journal. Other authors have no competing financial interests. Funding Information No funding was received for this article. References 1. Koutsouris D. The evolution of medical care: from the beginnings to personalized medicine. Health Technol 2017;7:3–4. 2. Hajar R. The air of history: early medicine to galen (part I). Heart Views 2012;13:120–128. 3. Pan S-Y, Litscher G, Gao S-H, et al. Historical perspective of traditional indigenous medical practices: The current renaissance and conservation of herbal resources. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2014;2014: 525340. 4. Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on the Use of Complementary and Alternative Medicine by the American Public. Complementary and Alternative Medicine in the United States. Washington, DC: National Academies Press (US); 2005. 5. Pearson NJ, Chesney MA. The National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine. Acad Med 2007;82:967. 6. Duffy JD, Cohen L, Chaoul A. Integrative medicine in mental health. In: Friedman HS, ed. Encyclopedia of Mental Health, 2nd ed. Oxford: Academic Press; 2016:384–389. 7. NCCAM. What Is Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM)? 2002. http://nccam.nih.gov/health/whatiscam/index.htm (last accessed April 30, 2021). 8. Ernst E, Resch KL, Mills S, et al. Complementary medicine—a definition. Br J Gen Pract 1995;45:506. 9. Rees L, Weil A. Integrated medicine. BMJ 2001;322:119–120. 10. National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health, NIH. Complementary, Alternative, or Integrative Health: What’s In a Name? https://www.nccih.nih.gov/health/complementaryalternative-or-integrative-health-whats-in-a-name (last accessed April 30, 2021). 11. Holmberg C, Brinkhaus B, Witt C. Experts’ opinions on terminology for complementary and integrative medicine—a qualitative study with leading experts. BMC Complement Altern Med 2012;12: 218. 12. Ernst E. The complementary/alternative medicine debate: a perpetuation of myths? Complement Ther Med 2000;8:214–215. Mukhopadhyay, et al.; Integrative Medicine Reports 2022, 1.1 http://online.liebertpub.com/doi/10.1089/imr.2022.0054 13. Cramer H, Lauche R, Langhorst J, Dobos G. Yoga for depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Depress Anxiety 2013;30:1068–1083. 14. Cramer H, Lauche R, Azizi H, et al. Yoga for multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2014;9:e112414. 15. Calcagni N, Gana K, Quintard B. A systematic review of complementary and alternative medicine in oncology: psychological and physical effects of manipulative and body-based practices. PLoS One 2019;14: e0223564. 16. Stoewen DL. Dimensions of wellness: change your habits, change your life. Can Vet J 2017;58:861–862. 17. Tan C-E, Jaffar A, Tong S-F, et al. Comprehensive healthcare module: medical and pharmacy students’ shared learning experiences. Med Educ Online 2014;19:25605. 18. Khatib OMN. Guidelines for the Prevention, Management and Care of Diabetes Mellitus. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2006. 19. American Diabetes Association. Evidence-based nutrition principles and recommendations for the treatment and prevention of diabetes and related complications. Diabetes Care 2002;25(Suppl. 1):s50–s60. 20. American Diabetes Association. 1. Improving care and promoting health in populations: standards of medical care in diabetes—2021. Diabetes Care 2021;44(Suppl. 1):S7–S14. 21. Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. Standard treatment guidelines screening, diagnosis, assessment, and management of primary hypertension in adults in India. 2016. https://nhm.gov.in/images/pdf/ guidelines/nrhm-guidelines/stg/Hypertension_full.pdf (last accessed May 21, 2021). 22. Thomas U, Claudio B, Fadi C, et al. 2020 International Society of Hypertension Global Hypertension Practice Guidelines. Hypertension 2020;75: 1334–1357. 23. Whelton PK, Carey RM, Aronow WS, et al. 2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA Guideline for the Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Management of High Blood Pressure in Adults. J Am Coll Cardiol 2018;71:e127–e248. 24. Cerezo C, Segura J, Praga M, Ruilope LM. Guidelines updates in the treatment of obesity or metabolic syndrome and hypertension. Curr Hypertens Rep 2013;15:196–203. 25. Penninx BWJH, Lange SMM. Metabolic syndrome in psychiatric patients: overview, mechanisms, and implications. Dialogues Clin Neurosci 2018;20: 63–73. 26. Grundy SM, Cleeman JI, Daniels SR, et al. Diagnosis and management of the metabolic syndrome. Circulation 2005;112:2735–2752. 27. Steiner TJ, Stovner LJ, Jensen R, et al. Migraine remains second among the world’s causes of disability, and first among young women: findings from GBD2019. J Headache Pain 2020;21:137. 28. Ha H, Gonzalez A. Migraine headache prophylaxis. AFP 2019;99:17–24. 29. Kumar A, Kadian R. Migraine prophylaxis. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island, FL: StatPearls Publishing; 2021. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/ NBK507873/ (last accessed May 18, 2021). 30. Karakurum Göksel B. The use of complementary and alternative medicine in patients with migraine. Noro Psikiyatr Ars 2013;50(Suppl. 1): S41–S46. 31. Wu A, March L, Zheng X, et al. Global low back pain prevalence and years lived with disability from 1990 to 2017: estimates from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Ann Transl Med 2020;8:299. 32. North American Spine Society. Evidence-Based Clinical Guidelines for Multidisciplinary Spine Care: Diagnosis and Treatment of Low Back Pain. Burr Ridge, IL: North American Spine Society; 2020. 33. National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health, NIH. Yoga: What You Need To Know. April 2021. https://www.nccih.nih .gov/health/yoga-what-you-need-to-know (last accessed May 23, 2021). 34. Qaseem A, Wilt TJ, McLean RM, Forciea MA. Noninvasive treatments for acute, subacute, and chronic low back pain: a clinical practice guideline from the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med 2017;166: 514–530. 35. World Health Organization. The ICD-10 Classification of Mental and Behavioural Disorders Clinical Descriptions and Diagnostic Guidelines, 10th ed. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 1992. 36. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Depression in adults: treatment and 2 management NICE guideline: short version draft for second consultation. May 2018. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/gid- 93 37. 38. 39. 40. 41. 42. 43. 44. 45. 46. 47. 48. 49. 50. 51. 52. 53. 54. 55. cgwave0725/documents/short-version-of-draft-guideline (last accessed May 4, 2021). American Psychiatric Association. Practice Guideline for the Treatment of Patients With Major Depressive Disorder, 3rd ed. American Psychiatric Association; 2010. https://psychiatryonline.org/pb/assets/raw/sitewide/ practice_guidelines/guidelines/mdd.pdf (last accessed May 4, 2021). American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5Ò). Washington (DC): American Psychiatric Association; 2013. American Psychiatric Association. Practice Guideline for the Treatment of Patients with Schizophrenia, 3rd ed. American Psychiatric Association; 2020. https://psychiatryonline.org/doi/pdf/10.1176/appi.books .9780890424841 (last accessed May 10, 2021). National Institute for Health and Care Excellence2. Recommendations j Psychosis and schizophrenia in adults: prevention and management j Guidance j NICE. 2014. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg178/ chapter/1-Recommendations (last accessed May 11, 2021). Harvey PD, Strassnig MT, Silberstein J. Prediction of disability in schizophrenia: symptoms, cognition, and self-assessment. J Exp Psychopathol 2019;10:2043808719865693. Kreyenbuhl J, Buchanan RW, Dickerson FB, Dixon LB. The schizophrenia patient outcomes research team (PORT): updated treatment recommendations 2009. Schizophr Bull 2010;36:94–103. Varambally S, George S, Gangadhar BN. Yoga for psychiatric disorders: from fad to evidence-based intervention? Br J Psychiatry 2020;216:291– 293. John Hopkins Medicine. Chinese Medicine. John Hopkins Medicine Health. https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/health/wellness-andprevention/chinese-medicine (last accessed May 21, 2021). Pandey MM, Rastogi S, Rawat AKS. Indian traditional ayurvedic system of medicine and nutritional supplementation. Evid Based Complement Altern Med 2013;2013:e376327. National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health, NIH. Health Topics A–Z. NCCIH, NIH. https://www.nccih.nih.gov/health/atoz (last accessed May 21, 2021). Bhargav H, George S, Varambally S, Gangadhar BN. Yoga and psychiatric disorders: a review of biomarker evidence. Int Rev Psychiatry 2021;33:162– 169. Kongkeaw C, Dilokthornsakul P, Thanarangsarit P, et al. Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on cognitive effects of Bacopa monnieri extract. J Ethnopharmacol 2014;151:528–535. Zahiruddin S, Basist P, Parveen A, et al. Ashwagandha in brain disorders: a review of recent developments. J Ethnopharmacol 2020;257: 112876. Chaudhari KS, Tiwari NR, Tiwari RR, Sharma RS. Neurocognitive effect of nootropic drug brahmi (Bacopa monnieri) in Alzheimer’s disease. Ann Neurosci 2017;24:111–122. Singh N, Bhalla M, de Jager P, Gilca M. An overview on ashwagandha: a rasayana (Rejuvenator) of ayurveda. Afr J Tradit Complement Altern Med 2011;8(5 Suppl.):208–213. Zhang W, Huai Y, Miao Z, et al. Systems pharmacology for investigation of the mechanisms of action of Traditional Chinese Medicine in drug discovery. Front Pharmacol 2019;10:743. Young A. Internalizing and externalizing medical belief systems: An Ethiopian example. Soc Sci Med (1967) 1976;10:147–156. Fokunang C, Ndikum V, Tabi O, et al. Traditional medicine: past, present and future research and development prospects and integration in the National Health System of Cameroon. Afr J Tradit Complement Altern Med 2011;8:284–295. National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health, NIH. Reiki. NCCIH, NIH. December 2018. https://www.nccih.nih.gov/health/reiki (last accessed May 21, 2021). Cite this article as: Mukhopadhyay S, Holla B, Bhargav H, Ramakrishna KK, Chikkanna U, Varambally S, Gangadhar BN (2022) Integrative medicine as ‘‘medicine’’: a perspective, Integrative Medicine Reports 1:1, 86–94, DOI: 10.1089/imr.2022.0054. Mukhopadhyay, et al.; Integrative Medicine Reports 2022, 1.1 http://online.liebertpub.com/doi/10.1089/imr.2022.0054 Abbreviations Used ADA APA BMI CAM CBT DM GOI LBP ¼ ¼ ¼ ¼ ¼ ¼ ¼ ¼ American Diabetes Association American Psychiatric Association body mass index complementary and alternative medicine cognitive behavioral therapy diabetes mellitus Government of India low back pain 94 NCCAM ¼ National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine NCCIH ¼ National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health NICE ¼ National Institute for Health and Care Excellence NSAIDs ¼ nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs SAMe ¼ S-adenosyl methionine SMI ¼ serious mental illness TCM ¼ Traditional Chinese Medicine WHO ¼ World Health Organization Publish in Integrative Medicine Reports Immediate, unrestricted online access Rigorous peer review - Compliance with open access mandates - Authors retain copyright - Highly indexed - Targeted email marketing - liebertpub.com/imr