CLB-09055; No. of pages: 4; 4C:
Clinical Biochemistry xxx (2015) xxx–xxx
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
Clinical Biochemistry
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/clinbiochem
Polymorphisms in FTO and TCF7L2 genes of Euro-Brazilian women with
gestational diabetes
Sandra Fabrico de Melo a, Henrique Ravanhol Frigeri a,b, Izabella Castilhos Ribeiro dos Santos-Weiss a,
Rosângela Roginski Réa c, Emanuel Maltempi de Souza d, Dayane Alberton a,
Fabiane Gomes de Moraes Rego a, Geraldo Picheth a,⁎
a
Post-Graduate Program in Pharmaceutical Science, Federal University of Parana, Brazil
Health and Biosciences School, Pontifical Catholic University of Parana, Curitiba, Parana, Brazil
c
Endocrinology and Metabolism Service (SEMPR), Clinical Hospital, Federal University of Parana, Brazil
d
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Federal University of Parana, Brazil
b
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Received 27 February 2015
Received in revised form 14 May 2015
Accepted 15 June 2015
Available online xxxx
Keywords:
Gestational diabetes mellitus
FTO
TCF7L2
Polymorphisms
Case-controlled study
SNP
a b s t r a c t
Objective: To investigate the association between fat mass and obesity-associated (FTO) gene polymorphisms rs8050136C N A and rs9939609T N A, and transcription factor 7-like 2 (TCF7L2) gene polymorphisms
rs12255372G N T and rs7903146C N T, in a sample group of pregnant Euro-Brazilian women with or without
gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM).
Methods: Subjects were classified as either healthy pregnant control (n = 200) or GDM (n = 200) according
to the 2010 criteria of the American Diabetes Association. The polymorphisms were genotyped using fluorescent
probes (TaqMan®).
Results: All groups were in the Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium. The genotype and allele frequencies of the
examined polymorphisms did not exhibit significant difference (P N 0.05) between the groups. In the healthy
and GDM pregnant women groups, the A-allele frequencies (95% CI) of FTO polymorphisms rs8050136 and
rs9939609 were 39% (34–44%); 38% (33–43%) and 40% (35–45%); 41% (36–46%), respectively; and the T-allele
frequencies of TCF7L2 polymorphisms rs12255372 and rs7903146 were 30% (26–35%), 32% (27–37%) and 29%
(25–34%), 36% (31–41%), respectively.
Conclusion: The examined polymorphisms were not associated with GDM in the Euro-Brazilian population
studied.
© 2015 The Canadian Society of Clinical Chemists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Introduction
Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a type of diabetes diagnosed
during pregnancy, which is not considered to be overt diabetes; GDM
affects 1–14% of all pregnancies worldwide, with rising incidence level
[1]. GDM occurs in about 7% of pregnancies in Brazil, a prevalence that
is rapidly increasing in association with the obesity epidemic [2].
Chronic hyperglycemia in GDM is associated with an increase in
the morbimortality of both the mother and fetus [3]. Patients with
GDM have increased risk of developing type 2 diabetes (T2D), and the
children of GDM mothers are more susceptible to diabetes and obesity
in adult life [1].
Obesity and family history of diabetes are two major risk factors
common to GDM and T2D [4]. These similarities suggest that both
⁎ Corresponding author at: Clinical Analysis Department, Federal University of Paraná,
Curitiba, Parana, Brazil Rua Prefeito Lothário Meissner, 632, 80210-170 Curitiba, PR, Brazil.
E-mail address: gpicheth@ufpr.br (G. Picheth).
these diseases could share genetic factors such as single nucleotide
polymorphisms (SNPs) involved in disease predisposition [5].
Fat mass and obesity-associated (FTO) is a protein-coding gene
located in chromosome region 16q12.2 (NCBI GeneID: 79068). It was
initially described in mice and encodes for a 502 amino acid protein
[6]. The FTO is associated with the control of food intake and energy
balance. However, the function of FTO remains to be elucidated [7].
Polymorphisms (SNPs) in this gene have been associated with obesity
in European subjects, as well as with the increase of fat mass in other
populations [7–9]. FTO SNPs rs8050136C N A and rs9939609T N A were
shown to be associated with fat body mass accumulation and obesity
in several studies, primarily among Asians and Europeans [6,10,11].
The transcription factor 7-like 2 (TCF7L2) gene is located in chromosome region 10q25.3 (NCBI GeneID: 6934), and encodes for a protein of
596 amino acids [12]. The TCF7L2 protein is involved in the Wnt signaling pathway. The Wnt glycoprotein enhances the formation of heterodimers of beta-catenin with TCF7L2, which induces the expression
of several genes such as glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1), insulin, and
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2015.06.013
0009-9120/© 2015 The Canadian Society of Clinical Chemists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Please cite this article as: de Melo SF, et al, Polymorphisms in FTO and TCF7L2 genes of Euro-Brazilian women with gestational diabetes, Clin
Biochem (2015), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2015.06.013
2
S.F. de Melo et al. / Clinical Biochemistry xxx (2015) xxx–xxx
those encoding proteins associated with exocytosis of insulin granules
in pancreatic beta cells [13,14].
Polymorphisms in the TCF7L2 have been associated with increased
susceptibility to T2D [15]. The best studied SNPs of the TCF7L2
(rs12255372G N T and rs7903146C N T) have been correlated with higher
body mass index (BMI) and T2D susceptibility in related studies
[16–18].
Few studies have examined the association between polymorphisms
of the FTO and TCF7L2 and gestational diabetes, particularly in the
Brazilian population. In this study, we examined the association of the
FTO polymorphisms rs8050136 and rs9939609, and the TCF7L2 polymorphisms rs12255372 and rs7903146 in pregnant Euro-Brazilian women
with or without gestational diabetes.
Materials and methods
Subjects
A total of 400 unrelated Euro-Brazilian women were examined.
Healthy pregnant women were classified as control (n = 200), and
pregnant women with GDM as GDM group (n = 200), according to
the 2010 criteria of the American Diabetes Association [19]. The studied
groups were unmatched by age or BMI.
The control group was recruited from the Municipal Laboratory of
Curitiba, and the GDM patients from the Clinical Hospital of the Federal
University of Parana. Both institutions are public, and are located in
Curitiba, State of Parana, Brazil.
This research was approved by the Federal University of Parana's
Ethics Committee (CEP/SD: 1045.170.10.11 and CAAE: 5876.0.000.09110).
Clinical and laboratory data
Clinical and anthropometric data were collected from patient files or
from electronic registries.
Routine biochemical parameters were determined using an
Architect® automated system. Reagents, calibrators, and controls
were provided by the manufacturer (Architect, Abbott Diagnostics).
1,5-Anhydroglucitol levels were measured by an enzymatic method
(GlycoMark, Inc.). Glycated hemoglobin (HbA1C) was quantified
using HPLC (Varian II, BioRad Diagnostics).
Genotyping
DNA was extracted from whole blood using the “salting out”
method [20] and normalized to 20 ng/μL for subsequent assays.
Only samples with 280/260 absorbance ratios of 1.8 to 2.0
(NanoDrop, ThermoScientific) were used in this study. Polymorphisms (TaqMan codes) rs8050136 (C_20311259_10), rs9939609
(C_30090620_10), rs12255372 (C_291484_20), and rs7903146
(C_29347861_10) were genotyped using fluorescent probes
(TaqMan®, Life Technologies) and the real time PCR StepOnePlus™
System (Life Technologies). All reagents were supplied by Life Technologies. The reaction mixtures contained 3.0 μL of Master Mix, 0.3 μL of
SNP Genotyping Assay (40 ×), 1.7 μL ultra-pure water and 1.0 μL of
DNA (20 ng/μL). The PCR cycle used was as follows: 10 min at 95 °C
(1 cycle) followed by 40 cycles of 15 s at 92 °C and 60 s at 60 °C. All
genotypes were analyzed using the StepOnePlus software, and genotypes obtained exhibited a minimal quality threshold of 95%.
Statistical analysis
Normality was tested using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. Comparisons of parameters with normal distribution were performed using the
Student t-test for independent samples, or the Mann–Whitney U test for
non-normal distribution variables. Categorical variables were compared
using the Fisher exact test (two-tailed) or the chi-square test, as appropriate. Allele frequencies and Hardy–Weinberg (HW) equilibrium were
verified using the Chi-square test (http://ihg.gsf.de/cgi-bin/hw/hwa1.pl).
Statistical analyses were performed with the Statistica for Windows
version 8.0 software (StatSoft Inc., Tulsa, OK, USA). A probability lower
than 5% (P b 0.05) was considered significant.
Results
The anthropometric and laboratory characteristics of the study's
subjects are detailed in Table 1.
GDM patients were significantly older, heavier (high body mass
index), and more hypertensive than healthy pregnant women (control).
GDM patients also had a high prevalence (approximately 70%) of diabetes
in their family history. Fasting glucose (b5.6 mmol/L) and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c b 6.5%; 47.5 mmol/mol) levels of the GDM group were
within the reference range, suggesting that these patients showed good
glycemic control. The low levels of 1,5-anhydroglucitol (b60.9 μmol/L;
b10 μg/mL), a marker for post-prandial hyperglycemia, in the GDM
group indicated the presence of hyperglycemic excursions in this group,
which is compatible with the disease.
Uric acid, total cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol, and triglycerides levels
were significantly higher (P b 0.05) in GDM patients. Only LDLcholesterol levels were not significantly different between the groups.
None of the patients had clinical symptoms of kidney disease or serum
creatinine above 97.2 μmol/L (1.1 mg/dL).
All genotypes in both groups were in HW equilibrium (P N 0.05). The
genotype and allele frequencies of the studied polymorphisms were not
significantly different (P N 0.05) between the groups (Table 2). The
sample size and power calculation for the results in Table 2 are low
and adequate for a prospective study. For an alpha of 0.05 and a
power of 0.80 a sample size larger than 1000 subjects per group should
be used.
Discussion
Several studies indicate that pregnant women with GDM are
often heavier and more hypertensive than healthy pregnant women
[21–23]. The characteristics of the GDM patients in our study are similar
to others reported.
Table 1
Anthropometric and laboratory characteristics of the study groups.
Characteristics
Control
n = 200
GDM
n = 200
P
Age, years
Body mass index, kg/m2
Hypertension, %
Family history of diabetes, %
Fasting glucose, mmol/L
2-h 75 g glucose, mmol/L
HbA1c, %c
1,5 anhydroglucitol, μmol/L
Creatinine, μmol/L
Urea, mmol/L
Uric acid, μmol/L
24.0 (20.0–28.0)
24.9 ± 4.0
0.5
–
4.59 (4.29–4.80)
–
–
90.8 (63.9–121.8)
70.7 (62.8–75.1)
3.32 (2.82–4.15)
202.2
(178.4–226.0)
4.92 ± 1.32
1,20 ± 0.28
3.15 ± 1.05
1.14 (0.87–1.49)
32.0 (28.0–36.0)
33.0 ± 6.4
6.5
69.0
4.90 (4.50–5.55)
9.09 (8.29–10.18)
5.7 (5.4–6.1) [39]
57.8 (36.6–77.9)
53.0 (50.4–63.6)
2.66 (2.16–3.24)
261.7
(226.0–309.3)
5.94 ± 1.27
1.44 ± 0.34
3.20 ± 1.06
2.53 (2.08–3.23)
b0.001a
b0.001
b0.001b
–
b0.001a
–
–
b0.001a
b0.001a
b0.001a
b0.001a
Total cholesterol, mmol/L
HDL-cholesterol, mmol/L
LDL-cholesterol, mmol/L
Triglycerides, mmol/L
b0.001
b0.001
0.612
b0.001a
Values are presented as mean ± SD, median (interquartile range) or %; and – , no information
available.
Control, healthy pregnant women; and GDM, gestational diabetes.
P values, t-test independent variables.
a
Mann–Whitney U test or.
b
Chi-square test.
c
HbA1c values in mmol/mol 39 (36–43).
Please cite this article as: de Melo SF, et al, Polymorphisms in FTO and TCF7L2 genes of Euro-Brazilian women with gestational diabetes, Clin
Biochem (2015), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2015.06.013
3
S.F. de Melo et al. / Clinical Biochemistry xxx (2015) xxx–xxx
Table 2
Genotype and allele frequencies of the FTO and TCF7L2 polymorphisms in the absence
(control) or presence of gestational diabetes (GDM).
Polymorphisms
Genotype
allele
Control
(n = 200)
GDM
(n = 200)
C/C
C/A
A/A
A
74 (37.0)
96 (48.0)
30 (15.0)
39.0 [34–44]
73 (35.5)
102 (51.0)
25 (12.5)
38.0 [33–43]
T/T
T/A
A/A
A
71 (35.5)
97 (48.5)
32 (16.0)
40.3 [35–45]
68 (34.0)
100 (50.2)
32 (15.8)
41.0 [36–46]
G/G
G/T
T/T
T
102 (51.0)
75 (37.5)
23 (11.5)
30.3 [26–35]
92 (46.0)
88 (44.0)
20 (10.0)
32.0 [27–37]
C/C
C/T
T/T
T
98 (49.0)
86 (43.0)
16 (8.0)
29.5 [25–34]
76 (38.0)
104 (52.0)
20 (10.0)
36.0 [31–41]
0.725
FTO rs8050136
Allele frequency (%)
FTO rs9939609
Allele frequency (%)
TCF7L2 rs12255372
Allele frequency (%)
TCF7L2 rs7903146
Allele frequency (%)
P
(χ2) 0.771
0.946
(χ2) 0.829
0.205
(χ2) 0.593
0.085
(χ2) 0.050
Control, healthy pregnant women; and GDM, gestational diabetes.
Values of genotypes are presented as n (%); allele frequencies as % [95% Confidence
Interval].
All genotypes were in Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium.
P-value, Fisher exact test two-tailed (genotype) or allele Chi-square test (χ2).
During normal pregnancy, the levels of total cholesterol and triglycerides in the plasma change atherogenically [24,25]. These changes are
aggravated in the presence of GDM [26]. This could explain the differences in the lipid profile between the study groups (Table 1). The levels
of the other laboratory parameters (Table 1) examined were as expected,
and the results were similar to those of several reports demonstrating
GDM patients with good glycemic control [21–25].
FTO polymorphisms have been associated with obesity, which is a
major risk factor for diabetes [11,27]. In our study, polymorphisms
rs9939609 and rs8050136, found in the FTO, were not associated with
GDM (Table 2). The A-allele of rs8050136 was found to correlate with diabetes in a Korean test-population, which exhibited increased levels of
insulin secretion (indicating a possible protective effect of this polymorphism in relation to the development of diabetes) [28].
The product of the TCF7L2 is involved in glycemic regulation and has
been associated with type 2 diabetes in different studies [13,29,30]. The
two intronic polymorphisms of TCF7L2 (rs7903146 and rs12255372)
studied did not correlate (P N 0.05) with gestational diabetes in our
test population (Table 2). Our results differed from those of a metaanalysis of four studies that examined rs12255372, and nine studies
evaluating rs7903146, which demonstrated an association among the
T-alleles and the risk for GDM [18].
The systematic review conducted by Zhang et al. [18] showed a compelling evidence for association of rs7903146T with GDM (Odds ratio
1.44; 95% CI 1.29–1.60, P b 0.001). These authors also showed a significative heterogeneity among Caucasians (I2 68.4%; P = 0.007). We hypothesized that the high miscegenation of the Brazilian population
added to the small sample size of this study could be the major factors
for the divergence of our results and the described systematic review.
The difference between the rs7903146 T-allele frequencies of the groups
was not significant (P = 0.050), but suggestive to more investigation,
especially with a large sample size. The T-allele was associated with impaired insulin secretion, enhanced rate of hepatic glucose production
[31,32], and with a high risk for GDM [32,33]. The association of this
polymorphism with T2D in a Euro-Brazilian population revealed that
the T-allele frequencies for healthy and T2D subjects were 27.0% and
35.8%, respectively [29]. These results were similar to those obtained
in the present study for GDM. Marquezine et al. [34] evaluated two
cohorts of Brazilian patients and found an association between type 2
diabetes and rs7903146 (P = 0.003; OR = 1.57 [1.16–2.11]) in one of
the cohorts.
Table 3 compares the studied risk allele frequencies in healthy subjects from different populations. Overall, the risk allele frequencies for
these polymorphisms among Brazilians were comparable to most
other populations, but significantly higher than Asian populations.
Since Brazilians are an admixed population, differences in genetic
background in the various regions could explain the disparity between
the results of our study and others regarding the rs7903146 polymorphisms. Additional studies with larger sample sizes are required to clarify the association between these polymorphisms and GDM. To the best
of our knowledge, this is the first study to examine polymorphisms in a
Brazilian population with GDM.
In conclusion, polymorphisms rs7903146 and rs12255372 of TCF7L2
and polymorphisms rs9939609 and rs8050136 of the FTO were not associated with GDM in the Euro-Brazilian population sample examined in
this study.
Acknowledgments
The CNPq and Araucaria Foundation supported this project.
No potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article have been
reported.
Table 3
Comparison between the allele frequencies of healthy pregnant women with those
obtained from other studies.
Gene polymorphism
Population
Allele frequencies (%)
References
FTO rs8050136
(A-allele)
Euro-Brazilian
39 [34–44]
This study
European
African American
Asian
Chinese Han
Euro-Brazilian
44.4
48.0
13.5
12.0
40 [35–45]
(31)
(35)
(28)
(9)
This study
Danish Caucasians
Europeans
African Americans
Spanish
British white
Chinese Han
Euro-Brazilian
46.2
44.4
48.0
39.3
40.0
12.0
30 [26–35]
(36)
(31)
(35)
(37)
(38)
(9)
This study
Mexican American
Southern Sweden
Czech
Caucasian
British
Indian
Mexican
Asian
Euro-Brazilian
39.4
30.9
30.6
36.0
29.0
18.0
11.4
0.2
29 [25–34]
(32)
(39)
(40)
(41)
(42)
(43)
(44)
(28)
This study
Greek women
European
Czech
Southern Sweden
Brazilian
Danish Caucasian
Scandinavian
British
Caucasian
Mexican
Sweden
Euro-Brazilian
Asian
39.5
38.4/32.2
33.8
32.9/39.1
33.5
34.6
31.9
30.7
34.0
32.0
28.0
27.0
3.9/6.0
(28)
(31) (45)
(40)
(46)
(34)
(36)
(47)
(42)
(48)
(49)
(49)
(29)
(45) (28)
FTO rs9939609
(A-allele)
TCF7L2 rs12255372
(T-allele)
TCF7L2 rs7903146
(T-allele)
The frequencies are presented as % [95% confidence interval].
Please cite this article as: de Melo SF, et al, Polymorphisms in FTO and TCF7L2 genes of Euro-Brazilian women with gestational diabetes, Clin
Biochem (2015), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2015.06.013
4
S.F. de Melo et al. / Clinical Biochemistry xxx (2015) xxx–xxx
References
[1] American Diabetes Association. Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus.
Diabetes Care 2013;36:S67–74.
[2] Sociedade-Brasileira-de-Diabetes. Diretrizes da Sociedade Brasileira de Diabetes
2012–2013. Barueri, São Paulo: Guanabara Koogan; 2013. p. 388.
[3] Metzger BE, Gabbe SG, Persson B, et al. International association of diabetes and
pregnancy study groups recommendations on the diagnosis and classification of
hyperglycemia in pregnancy. Diabetes Care 2010;33:676–82.
[4] Buchanan TA, Xiang A, Kjos SL, Watanabe R. What is gestational diabetes? Diabetes
Care 2007;30(Suppl. 2):S105–11.
[5] Castorino K, Jovanovic L. Pregnancy and diabetes management: advances and
controversies. Clin Chem 2011;57:221–30.
[6] Lima WA, Glaner MF, Taylor AP. Fenótipo da gordura, fatores associados e o
polimorfismo rs9939609 do gene FTO. Rev Bras Cineantropom Desempenho Hum
2010;12:164–72.
[7] Labayen I, Ruiz JR, Ortega FB, et al. Association between the FTO rs9939609 polymorphism and leptin in European adolescents: a possible link with energy balance
control. The HELENA study. Int J Obes (Lond) 2011;35:66–71.
[8] Hotta K, Nakata Y, Matsuo T, et al. Variations in the FTO gene are associated with
severe obesity in the Japanese. J Hum Genet 2008;53:546–53.
[9] Li H, Wu Y, Loos RJ, et al. Variants in the fat mass- and obesity-associated (FTO) gene
are not associated with obesity in a Chinese Han population. Diabetes 2008;57:264–8.
[10] Ahmad T, Chasman DI, Mora S, et al. The fat-mass and obesity-associated (FTO)
gene, physical activity, and risk of incident cardiovascular events in white women.
Am Heart J 2010;160:1163–9.
[11] Liu Y, Liu Z, Song Y, et al. Meta-analysis added power to identify variants in FTO
associated with type 2 diabetes and obesity in the Asian population. Obesity (Silver
Spring) 2010;18:1619–24.
[12] Tong Y, Lin Y, Zhang Y, Yang J, Liu H, Zhang B. Association between TCF7L2 gene polymorphisms and susceptibility to type 2 diabetes mellitus: a large Human Genome
Epidemiology (HuGE) review and meta-analysis. BMC Med Genet 2009;10:15.
[13] Prestwich TC, Macdougald OA. Wnt/beta-catenin signaling in adipogenesis and
metabolism. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2007;19:612–7.
[14] Raitakari OT, Ronnemaa T, Huupponen R, et al. Variation of the transcription factor
7-like 2 (TCF7L2) gene predicts impaired fasting glucose in healthy young adults:
the cardiovascular risk in young Finns study. Diabetes Care 2007;30:2299–301.
[15] Yi F, Brubaker PL, Jin T. TCF-4 mediates cell type-specific regulation of proglucagon
gene expression by beta-catenin and glycogen synthase kinase-3beta. J Biol Chem
2005;280:1457–64.
[16] Ciccacci C, Di Fusco D, Cacciotti L, et al. TCF7L2 gene polymorphisms and type 2
diabetes: association with diabetic retinopathy and cardiovascular autonomic
neuropathy. Acta Diabetol 2013;50:789–99.
[17] Klein K, Haslinger P, Bancher-Todesca D, et al. Transcription factor 7-like 2 gene
polymorphisms and gestational diabetes mellitus. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med
2012;25:1783–6.
[18] Zhang C, Bao W, Rong Y, et al. Genetic variants and the risk of gestational diabetes
mellitus: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update 2013;19:376–90.
[19] American Diabetes Association. Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus.
Diabetes Care 2010;33(Suppl. 1):S62–9.
[20] Lahiri DK, Nurnberger Jr JI. A rapid non-enzymatic method for the preparation of
HMW DNA from blood for RFLP studies. Nucleic Acids Res 1991;19:5444.
[21] Bryson CL, Ioannou GN, Rulyak SJ, Critchlow C. Association between gestational
diabetes and pregnancy-induced hypertension. Am J Epidemiol 2003;158:
1148–53.
[22] Langer O, Yogev Y, Xenakis EM, Brustman L. Overweight and obese in gestational diabetes: the impact on pregnancy outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005;192:1768–76.
[23] Lindheimer MD, Taler SJ, Cunningham FG. Hypertension in pregnancy. J Am Soc
Hypertens 2008;2:484–94.
[24] Chiang AN, Yang ML, Hung JH, Chou P, Shyn SK, Ng HT. Alterations of serum lipid
levels and their biological relevances during and after pregnancy. Life Sci 1995;56:
2367–75.
[25] Toescu V, Nuttall SL, Martin U, et al. Changes in plasma lipids and markers of oxidative stress in normal pregnancy and pregnancies complicated by diabetes. Clin Sci
(Lond) 2004;106:93–8.
[26] McGrowder D, Grant K, Irving R, et al. Lipid profile and clinical characteristics of
women with gestational diabetes mellitus and preeclampsia. J Med Biochim 2009;
28:72–81.
[27] Ramya K, Radha V, Ghosh S, Majumder PP, Mohan V. Genetic variations in the FTO
gene are associated with type 2 diabetes and obesity in south Indians (CURES-79).
Diabetes Technol Ther 2011;13:33–42.
[28] Cho YM, Kim TH, Lim S, et al. Type 2 diabetes-associated genetic variants discovered
in the recent genome-wide association studies are related to gestational diabetes
mellitus in the Korean population. Diabetologia 2009;52:253–61.
[29] Barra GB, Dutra LA, Watanabe SC, et al. Association of the rs7903146 single nucleotide polymorphism at the transcription factor 7-like 2 (TCF7L2) locus with type 2
diabetes in Brazilian subjects. Arq Bras Endocrinol Metabol 2012;56:479–84.
[30] Scott LJ, Bonnycastle LL, Willer CJ, et al. Association of transcription factor 7-like 2
(TCF7L2) variants with type 2 diabetes in a Finnish sample. Diabetes 2006;55:
2649–53.
[31] Ekelund M, Shaat N, Almgren P, et al. Genetic prediction of postpartum diabetes in
women with gestational diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2012;97:394–8.
[32] Watanabe RM, Black MH, Xiang AH, Allayee H, Lawrence JM, Buchanan TA. Genetics
of gestational diabetes mellitus and type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2007;30(Suppl.
2):S134–40.
[33] Shaat N, Lernmark A, Karlsson E, et al. A variant in the transcription factor 7-like 2
(TCF7L2) gene is associated with an increased risk of gestational diabetes mellitus.
Diabetologia 2007;50:972–9.
[34] Marquezine GF, Pereira AC, Sousa AG, Mill JG, Hueb WA, Krieger JE. TCF7L2 variant
genotypes and type 2 diabetes risk in Brazil: significant association, but not a significant tool for risk stratification in the general population. BMC Med Genet 2008;9:
106.
Please cite this article as: de Melo SF, et al, Polymorphisms in FTO and TCF7L2 genes of Euro-Brazilian women with gestational diabetes, Clin
Biochem (2015), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2015.06.013