Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
medRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.08.17.20176537; this version posted August 21, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license . Urban Sprawl of Covid-19 Epidemic in India: Lessons in the First Semester Rajeev Gupta1 Kiran Gaur2 Raghubir S Khedar1 Rajinder K Dhamija3 From:1Department of Medicine, Eternal Heart Care Centre & Research Institute, Jaipur, India; 2 Department of Statistics, Mathematics and Computer Science, SKN College of Agriculture, SKN Agriculture University, Jobner, Jaipur, India. 3Department of Neurology, Lady Hardinge Medical College & SSK Hospital, New Delhi, India. Correspondence: Dr Rajeev Gupta, Department of Medicine, Eternal Heart Care Centre & Research Institute, Jagatpura Road, Jawahar Circle, Jaipur 302017 India. Email: rajeevgg@gmail.com; drrajeev.gupta@eternalheart.org; Phone: +91-141-5147000; FAX +91-141-5147001. Wordcount: Abstract: 251; Text: 1987; References: 43; Tables 3; Figures 5; Supplementary Table 1. 1 NOTE: This preprint reports new research that has not been certified by peer review and should not be used to guide clinical practice. medRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.08.17.20176537; this version posted August 21, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license . ABSTRACT Background & Objective : The covid-19 epidemic is rapidly escalating in India and unlike developed countries there is no evidence of plateau or decline in the past 6 months. To evaluate association of state-level sociodemographics with incident cases and deaths we performed an ecological study. : Publicly available data sources were used. Absolute number of covid-19 cases and deaths Methods were obtained and cases and deaths/million in each state calculated from February to July 2020. To assess association of state level disease burden with sociodemographic variables (urbanization, human development, healthcare availability, healthcare access and quality etc.) we determined Pearson’s correlation and logarithmic trends. : Covid-19 in India has led to >2,000,000 cases and 45,000 deaths by end July 2020. There is large Results variation in state-level cases/million ranging from 7247 (Delhi), 3728 (Goa) and 3427 (Maharashtra) to less than 300/million in a few. Deaths/million range from 212 (Delhi), 122 (Maharashtra) and 51 (Tamilnadu) to 2 in north-eastern states. Most of the high burden states (except Delhi) are reporting increasing burden and deaths with the largest increase in July 2020. There is a significant positive correlation of urbanization with covid-19 cases (r=0.65, R2=0.35) and deaths (r=0.60, R2=0.28) and weaker correlation with other sociodemographic variables. From March to July 2020, stable R2 value for urbanization is observed with cases (0.37 to 0.39) while it is increasing for deaths (0.10 to 0.28). Conclusions : Covid-19 epidemic is escalating in India and cases as well as deaths are significantly greater in more urbanized states. Prevention, control and treatment should focus on urban health systems. KEYWORDS: Covid-19; SARS; Coronavirus; India; Epidemiology; Urban Health; 2 medRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.08.17.20176537; this version posted August 21, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license . INTRODUCTION Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) related to novel coronavirus (covid-19) has rapidly spread globally. Initial cases were reported from China from where it rapidly spread to Europe, East Asia, Europe, North and South America and lately to Africa and South Asia.1 India is currently facing the maximum impact.2,3 The disease has been an urban phenomenon globally and has been mainly reported from densely populated urban conglomerations in China and low socioeconomic status urban locations in Europe and North America.4 United Nations estimates that 90% of all Covid-19 cases are urban and there is only limited evidence of rural spread.5 Covid-19 related burden has been controlled in many countries across the globe using well known public health strategies of testing and tracing of cases (using laboratory methods) and isolation.6 This strategy combined with universal masking, hand hygiene and sanitation, avoidance of crowding and physical distancing has led to virtual disappearance of covid-19 from some countries.7 Drug therapies for prophylaxis or treatment are yet not available as none has proved successful in randomised controlled trials.8 Vaccine is under development. In India, the epidemic is now a semester (6 months) old. Epidemiological transition of the disease from contacts of returning travellers from Asia and Europe to metropolitan cities and large townships has been reported.9 The disease has now transited from the major metropolises to smaller cities, towns and townships with limited spread to the rural.10 The disease initially presented in low socioeconomic urban locations and gradually spread to rural locations due to large scale urban to rural migration.9 However, it remained ensconced in urban areas also and with the release of government-instituted lockdown and subsequent crowding the epidemic has resurfaced in urban locations.11 This is unlike the olden epidemics whence disease would transmit from the rich to poor people and urban to rural locations.12,13 Understanding macrolevel determinants of this transition is important for understanding covid-19 dynamics and to formulate policies for controlling it. In the present article we describe covid-19 related disease and death burden in terms of absolute numbers and per million populations in all states of the country using publicly available data over the first semester of the India epidemic, February to July 2020. We have also estimated association of disease burden and mortality with various sociodemographic indices using univariate analysis to identify important drivers. METHODS The study has been conducted using publicly available data.9,14 The project proposal was submitted to institutional ethics committee as part of covid-19 registry being maintained at our centre. The committee approved use of secondary data for this report. Daily data on covid-19 in various states and 3 medRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.08.17.20176537; this version posted August 21, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license . regions of India are being regularly updated at a non-commercial public website, www.covid19india.org.14 This website updates daily data on covid-19 related cases, deaths, recovery and testing at the state level of India. We obtained data for all the states in the country and clubbed daily data into weekly and monthly numbers beginning February 2020 to end of July 2020. The data were collated on spreadsheets. We then calculated number of cases and deaths per million population (2020 estimates) for each state. We also obtained data on multiple sociodemographic indices of each state from public websites. The following indices were used: urbanization index (UI, proportion of urban to rural population), human development index (HDI), social development index (SDI),sociodemographic index (SI), epidemiological transition index (ETI, proportion of disability adjusted life years due to communicable, maternal, neonatal and nutritional diseases to non-communicable diseases), healthcare availability and quality index (HAQI), healthcare availability index (HAI), and social vulnerability index (VI). (Supplementary Table 1). Details of estimation of each of these indices have been reported earlier.15,16 To determine association of the state-level sociodemographic variables with covid-19 cases and deaths we initially calculated Pearson’s correlation coefficient (r value) using MS Office Excel-2007. MS Office Powerpoint-2007 was used to plot scatter-graphs for estimation of correlation of various sociodemographic indices with total cases/million and deaths/million at end of 6 months of the data (July 2020). Logarithmic trend-line was drawn to calculate trends (R2). SPSS Statistical Package was used to calculate univariate and multivariate regression association statistics. To identify monthly change in sociodemographic association with covid-19 cases/million and deaths/million we calculated R2 values for months of April, May, June and July. RESULTS India is currently (July 2020) reporting more than 50,000 covid-9 cases and 1,000 covid-19 related deaths daily and the cumulative burden is high for cases (>1,800,000) as well as deaths (38,000). India is among the top-5 countries in terms of absolute number of cases and deaths.17 Although, the number of cases and deaths per million (cases 1300, deaths 30) is low, it is the only large country where the epidemic is escalating. There is significant state-level variation with five states- Maharashtra, Tamilnadu, Andhra Pradesh, Delhi and Karnataka accounting for more than two-thirds of cases and deaths (Figure 1). Cases and deaths per million also show large variation with cases per million highest in Delhi (7247), Goa (3728), Maharashtra (3427), Tamilnadu (3158) and Andhra Pradesh (2614) and deaths per million the highest in 4 medRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.08.17.20176537; this version posted August 21, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license . Delhi (212), Maharashtra (122), Tamilnadu (51), Gujarat (38) and Pondicherry (35) (Figure 2). Absolute number and numbers/million population of monthly covid-19 cases in various states of the country are shown in Table 1.The cases were low in Feb to May 2020 but have increased rapidly in the following months with greatest escalation in July 2020. Significant diversity is observed in trends of increase in monthly number of cases and cases/million across various states of the country. Greatest month-onmonth increase is observed in a few states: Delhi, Goa, Maharashtra, Tamilnadu and Andhra Pradesh (Figure 3). Absolute number of deaths/month and death/million/month are shown in Table 2. Similar to cases, deaths are the highest in Maharashtra, Delhi, Tamilnadu, Gujarat and Karnataka while deaths/million are the highest in Delhi, Maharashtra, Tamilnadu, Gujarat and Pondicherry. State-level trends in monthly deaths/million reveal rapidly escalating trends in Delhi, Maharashtra, Tamilnadu, Gujarat and Pondicherry. ON the other hand, a decline in trends of deaths/million is observed in Delhi and Andhra Pradesh (Figure 3). We correlated cumulative covid-19 cases and deaths/million at July 2020 with various sociodemographic indices (Table 3). A significant correlation of state-level urbanization index is observed with cases/million (r= 0.58, R2= 0.35) as well as deaths/million (r= 0.55, R2= 0.28) (Figure 4). Significant correlation (r value) is also observed for cases/million with HDI (0.42), sociodemographic index (0.60), ETI (-0.44) and HAQI (0.50) and non-significant correlation with SDI (-0.20), HAI (0.12), and VI (0.01). Significant correlation for deaths/million is observed for UI and sociodemographic index (0.50) only (Table 3). Multiple regression analysis reveals that the only significant association for covid-19 related deaths is with urbanization index (B= 0.55+0.24, standardized beta= 0.52, p=0.040). To evaluate monthly trends in association of cases and deaths/million with urbanization index we performed monthly analysis from April to July 2020 (Figure 5). Association of urbanization with cases/million for months of April, May, June and July, respectively, is similar (R2= 0.38, 0.37, 0.38 and 0.29) while with deaths/million it is increasing (R2= 0.10, 0.20, 0.21 and 0.28). DISCUSSION This study shows rapidly increasing burden of covid-19 cases and deaths in terms of absolute numbers as well as proportion per million in all regions of India. The burden is significantly greater in more urbanized states and mortality from the disease is increasing in these states during the first six months of the epidemic. Observational data from Europe and North America have not highlighted urban-rural difference in covid-19 burden.5 This could be due to the fact that most of these countries are highly urbanized (705 medRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.08.17.20176537; this version posted August 21, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license . 90%). In countries with larger proportion of rural individuals, such as China, Brazil, Iran, Mexico and South Africa, reports have highlighted the predominant urban nature of the disease,5 similar to our study. Reports from China, Europe, UK and USA have also reported that urban low socioeconomic status individuals, especially the minorities, are at greater risk of disease and deaths from covid-19.18,19,20 The UK Office of National Statistics has reported that the age-standardized mortality rate from covid-19 in the most deprived areas was 55.1/100,000 compared to 25.3/100,000 in the least deprived areas.21 In USA, a study from New York reported that number of patients hospitalized/100,000 (moderate to severe disease) population was the highest in the borough of Bronx (634) and lowest in Manhattan (331), and number of deaths/100N000 population was also the highest in Bronx (224) and lowest in Manhattan (122).22 The Bronx has the highest proportion of ethnic minorities, the most persons living in poverty and the lowest levels of educational attainment as compared to other boroughs of New York. Clinical registries from China, Europe and North America have highlighted a specific phenotype that is more prone to mortality from this infection- older age, male sex, hypertension, diabetes, obesity, concomitant cardiovascular disease and heart failure- especially in low socioeconomic status individuals.19,20,23,24,25 Because data on these variables is not available to us we cannot comment of association of these comorbidities with risk of developing or dying from covid-19 in India. However, epidemiological studies have consistently reported greater prevalence of elderly, obesity, hypertension, diabetes and cardiovascular diseases at the urban locations in India.26,27,28,29 In the present study we have not evaluated the patient-level socioeconomic or ethnic characteristics as such data are not available. However association of state-level development and healthcare related characteristics show insignificant correlation when adjusted for urbanization (Table 3). On the other hand, non-peer reviewed data from India has reported that more than two-thirds of the patients are concentrated in 13 Indian cities.30 Initial concentration of patients in low socioeconomic status localities within the urban locations has been reported.9 More studies regarding socioeconomic macro- and micro-level determinants of covid-19 infection are required from India as it has been predicted that covid-19 epidemic shall ultimately reside among the lower socioeconomic stratum in most countries.12 Public health strategies that have been successful in various high-income countries of Asia and Europe have focused on widespread testing for covid-19 virus using appropriate technologies, social (physical) distancing, quarantining of the cases using either hospital or home isolation and aggressive and rapid tracing of contacts and their isolation.31 Other interventions include protection of healthcare workers; monitoring hotspots; watching for imports; clear and honest communication; avoiding going 6 medRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.08.17.20176537; this version posted August 21, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license . back to ‘normal’; and investing in finding alternate strategies.32 Consideration for economic effects, social isolation, family relationships, health related behaviours, disruption to essential services, disruption of education, traffic, transport and green spaces, social disorder and psychosocial impacts is essential.33 Lockdown has led to both macro- micro-level adverse economic consequences in India and most developing countries.34 Development of preventive medicines and vaccines is a work in progress.35 Controlled initiation of population-wide (herd) immunity has been suggested as the only alternative for India,36 but if uncontrolled can lead to disastrous health consequences. The essential urban nature of the disease and rapid spread of the disease in slums pose a challenge to control the epidemic in India and similar countries.5 Urban locations in India and slums are least prepared for the pandemic of covid-19 as most basic needs such as regular water supply, toilets, waste collection and adequate and secure housing are almost non-existent.37 Interventions that have been found useful in China and European countries may be impractical. Corburn et al suggest science-based policies for arresting course of the disease, improving general medical care, provision of economic, social and physical improvements, and focus on urban poor including migrants and slum-communities and certain microlevel strategies.38 Focus on using social and behavioural science techniques is essential to harness of benefits of such interventions.39 Focus on universal health coverage and creating resilient health infrastructure is crucial.40,41 Lessons from the covid-19 epidemic should guide policymakers to improve urban primary care and district hospitals.42 The present study shows that the covid-19 epidemic in India is still an urban phenomenon. It is probably in an intermediate stage of epidemiological transition.9 Non-pharmaceutical and multifocal policy level interventions are the most effective method to decrease the burden of this disease, although randomised trials are needed.43 A judicious strategy targeted to the urban population, especially the poor, with proper testing and containment, facilities for physical distancing and personal protection would be the most appropriate intervention. 7 medRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.08.17.20176537; this version posted August 21, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license . REFERENCES 1. Dawood FS, Ricks P, Njie GJ, Daugherty M, Davis W, Fuller JA, et al. Observations of the global epidemiology of COVID-19 from the prepandemic period using web-based surveillance: a cross-sectional analysis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 Jul 29:S1473-3099(20)30581-8. DOI: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30581-8. 2. Editorial. India under covid-19 lockdown. Lancet. 2020; 395:1315. 3. Pulla P. The epidemic is growing very rapidly: Indian government adviser fears coronavirus crisis will worsen. Nature. 2020; 583:180. 4. Lee VJ, Ho M, Kai CW, Aguilera X, Heymann D, Wilder-Smith A. Epidemic preparedness in urban settings: new challenges and opportunities. Lancet Infect Dis. 2020; 20:527-529. 5. United Nations. Policy brief: Covid-19 in an urban world. United Nations. July 2020. 6. Baker MG, Anglemeyer A. Successful elimination of covid-19 transmission in New Zealand. N Engl J Med. 2020; DOI: 10.1056/NEJMc2025203. 7. Chu DK, Akl EA, Duda S, Spolo KL, Yaacoub S, Schunemann J, et al. Physical distancing, face masks and eye protection to prevent person-to-person transmission if SARS-CoV-2 and Covid-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 395; 2020;1973-1987. 8. Siemieniuk RAC, Bartoszko JJ, Ge L, Zeeratkar D, Iscovich A, Pardo-Hernandez H, et al. Drug treatments for covid-19: living systematic review and network meta-analysis. BMJ. 2020; 370:m2980. 9. Gupta R, Dhamija RK, Gaur K. Epidemiological transition of covid-19 in India from higher to lower HDI states and territories: Implications for prevention and control. medRxiv preprints. 2020; DOI: 10.1101/2020.05.05.20092593. 10. Mishra S, Mohapatra A, Kumar R, Singh A, Bhadoria AS, Kant R, Restricting rural-urban connect to combat infectious disease epidemic as India fights Covid-19. J Fam Med Prim Care. 2020; 9:1792-1794. 11. Chandrashekhar V. As India’s lockdown ends, exodus from cities risks spreading Covid-19 far and wide. Science 2020; DOI: 10.1126/science.abc9596. 12. Harrison M. Contagion: How commerce has spread disease. New Haven. Yale University Press. 2012; 1-23. 13. Admas LV, Butterly JR. Diseases of poverty: epidemiology, infectious diseases and modern plagues. Hanover. Dartmouth College Press. 2015. 14. Anonymous. Coronavirus outbreak in India. Available at; www.covid19india.org. Accessed 10 Aug 2020.. 15. Gupta R, Gaur K, Ram CVS. Emerging trends in hypertension epidemiology in India. J Hum Hypertens. 2019. 33:575-587. 16. Acharya R, Porwal A. A vulnerability index for the management of ans response to the covid-19 epidemic in India; an ecological study. Lancet Glob Health. 2020; DOI: 10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30300-4. 17. Financial Times Visual and Data Journalism Team. Coronavirus tracked: see how your country compares. Available at: https://ig.ft.com/coronavirus-chart/ Accesssed 15 Aug 2020. 18. Balbo N, Kashnitsky I, Melegaro A, Mesle F, Mills MC, de Valk H, et al. Demography and the coronavirus pandemic. Population and Policy Brief no. 25. Berlin. Max Planck Society & Population Europe. 2020 19. Williamson EJ, Walker AJ, Bhaskaran K, Bacon S, Bates C, Morton CE, et al. Factors associated with covid-19 related death using OpenSafely. Nature. 2020 Jul 8; DOI: 10.1038/s41586-020-2521-4. 20. Richardson S, Hirsch JS, Narasimhan M, Crawford JM, McGinn T, Davidson KW, et al. Presenting characteristics, comorbidities and outcomes among 5700 patients hospitalized with covid-19 in the New York City area. JAMA. 2020; 323:2052-2059. 8 medRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.08.17.20176537; this version posted August 21, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license . 21. Iacobucci G. Covid-19: deprived areas have the highest death rates in England and Wales. BMJ 2020; 369:m1810. 22. Wadhera RK, Wadhera P, Gaba P, Figueroa JF, Joynt-Maddox KE, Yeh RW, et al. Variation in covid-19 hospitalization and deaths across New York City boroughs. JAMA. 2020; 323:2192-2195. 23. Guan WJ, Ni ZY, Hu Y, Liang WH, Ou CQ, He JX, et al. China Medical Treatment Expert Group for Covid-19. Clinical characteristics of coronavirus disease 2019 in China. N Engl J Med. 2020;382:1708-1720. 24. Cummings MJ, Baldwin MR, Abrams D, Jacobson SD, Meyer BJ, Balough EM, et al. Epidemiology, clinical course, and outcomes of critically ill adults with covid-19 in New York City: a prospective cohort study. Lancet. 2020; 395:1763=1770. 25. Docherty AB, Harrison EM, Green CA, Hardwick HE, Pius R, Normal L, et al. Features of 20,133 UK patients in hospital with covid-19 using the ISARIC WHO clinical characterization protocol: prospective observational cohort study. BMJ. 2020; 369:m1985. 26. NCD Risk Factor Collaboration (NCDRiSC). Rising rural body-mass index is the main driver of global obesity epidemic in adults. Nature. 2019; 569:260-264. 27. Gupta R, Ram CVS. Hypertension epidemiology in India: emerging aspects. Curr Opin Cardiol.2019; 34:331-341. 28. India State-Level Disease Burden Initiative Collaborators. The increasing trends in diabetes and variations among the states of India: The Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet Glob Health. 2018; 6:e1352-1362. 29. India State-Level Disease Burden Initiative Collaborators. The evolution of cardiovascular diseases and their risk factors in the states of India: the Global Burden of Disease Study 1990-2016. Lancet Glob Health. 2018; 6:e1339-1351. 30. Awasthi A, Mavlankar D. Covid-19 in India: an epidemic in congested cities. BMJ Global Health Blog. 2020; Available at: https://blogs.bmj.com/bmjgh/2020/05/28/covid-19-in-india-an-epidemic-in-congested-cities/. 31. Gawande A. Amid the coronavirus crisis, a regimen for reentry. New Yorker. 13 May 2020. Available at: https://newyorker.com/science/medical-dispatch/amid-the-coronavirus-crisis-a-regimen-for-renetry. 32. Ebrahim SH, Ahmed QA, Gozzer E, Schlagenhauf P, Memish ZA. Covid-19 and community mitigation strategies in a pandemic. BMJ. 2020; 368:m1066. 33. Douglas M, Katikireddi SV, Taulbut M, McKee M, McCartney G. Mitigating the wider health effects of covid-19 pandemic response. BMJ. 2020; 369:m1557. 34. Cash R, Patel V. Has covid-19 subverted global health? Lancet. 2020; 395:1687-1688. 35. Bhopal RS. Covid-19 zugzwang: potential public health moves towards population (herd) immunity. Public Health Practice. 2020; 1:100031. 36. Mullard A. Covid-19 vaccine development pipeline gears up. Lancet. 2020; 395:1751-1752. 37. Butsch C, Sakdapolrak P, Saravanan VS. Urban health in India. Int Asienforum. 2012; 43:13-32. 38. Corburn J, Vlahov D, Mberu B, Riley L, Caiaffa WT, Rashid SF, et al. Slum health: arresting covid-19 and improving well being in urban informal settlements. J Urban Health. 2020; 97:348-357. 39. Bavel JJV, Baicker K, Boggio PS, Capraro V, Cichocka A, Cikara M, et al. Using social and behavioral science to support Covid-19 pandemic response. Nat Hum Behav. 2020; 4:460-471. 40. Reddy KS, Patel V, Jha P, Paul VK, Shivakumar AK, Dandona LK, et al. Towards achievement of universal healthcare in India by 2020: a call top action. Lancet. 2011; 377:760-768. 41. Durski KN, Osterholm M, Majumdar SS, Nilles E, Bausch DG, Atun R. Shifting the paradigm: using disease outbreaks to build resilient health systems. BMJ Glob Health. 2020; 5:e002499. 9 medRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.08.17.20176537; this version posted August 21, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license . 42. Gupta R. Health systems in post-covid-19 era: strengthening primary care and district hospitals. RUHS J Health Sciences. 2020; 5:61-65. 43. Haushofer J, Metcalf CJE. Which interventions work best in a pandemic? Science. 2020; 368:1063-1065. 10 medRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.08.17.20176537; this version posted August 21, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license . Table 1: Monthly covid-19 cases in absolute numbers and cases/million in various states State Andhra Pradesh Arunachal Pradesh Assam Bihar Chandigarh Chhattisgarh Delhi Goa Gujarat Haryana Himachal Pradesh Jammu & Kashmir Jharkhand Karnataka Kerala Madhya Pradesh Maharashtra Manipur Meghalaya Mizoram Nagaland Orissa Pondicherry Punjab Rajasthan Sikkim Tamil Nadu Telangana Tripura Uttar Pradesh Uttarakhand West Bengal Feb/March 44 (0.82) 0 (0) 1 (0.03) 21 (0.17) 15 (12.95) 9 (0.31) 120 (6.41) 5 (3.15) 74 (1.16) 43 (1.52) 3 (0.4) 55 (4.04) 1 (0.03) 101 (1.49) 241 (6.75) 66 (0.77) 302 (2.45) 1 (0.32) 0 (0) 1 (0.81) 0 (0) 4 (0.09) 1 (0.71) 42 (1.39) 93 (1.15) 0 (0) 124 (1.59) 97 (2.46) 0 (0) 104 (0.44) 7 (0.62) 37 (0.37) April 1359 (25.21) 1 (0.64) 42 (1.18) 404 (3.24) 59 (50.93) 31 (1.05) 3395 (181.44) 2 (1.26) 4321 (67.65) 296 (10.49) 37 (4.97) 559 (41.08) 109 (2.82) 464 (6.87) 257 (7.2) 2559 (29.98) 10196 (82.8) 1 (0.320 12 (3.56) 0 (0) 0 (0) 139 (3) 7 (4.95) 438 (14.53) 2491 (30.74) 0 (0) 2199 (28.25) 941 (23.91) 3 (0.72) 2107 (8.86) 50 (4.44) 721 (7.24) May 2168 (40.22) 3 (1.91) 1297 (36.43) 3382 (27.1) 219 (189.04) 458 (15.56) 16329 (872.7) 64 (40.35) 12399 (194.12) 1752 (62.12) 291 (39.05) 1832 (134.64) 525 (13.6) 2656 (39.31) 772 (21.62) 5464 (64.01) 57157 (464.15) 69 (22.32) 15 (4.46) 0 (0) 43 (19.11) 1805 (38.94) 62 (43.86) 1783 (59.15) 6247 (77.09) 1 (1.45) 20010 (257.06) 1660 (42.17) 313 (75.06) 5864 (24.65) 850 (75.55) 4743 (47.62) 11 June 11024 (204.51) 187 (119.07) 6966 (195.64) 6181 (49.53) 147 (126.89) 2360 (80.17) 67516 (3608.37) 1244 (784.24) 15849 (248.14) 12457 (441.66) 622 (83.47) 5051 (371.22) 1855 (48.06) 12021 (177.92) 3173 (88.88) 5504 (64.48) 107106 (869.76) 1163 (376.19) 26 (7.72) 159 (128.3) 416 (184.91) 5117 (110.38) 644 (455.59) 3305 (109.65) 9177 (113.25) 87 (126.04) 67834 (871.44) 13641 (346.55) 1077 (258.29) 15417 (64.81) 1974 (175.45) 13058 (131.09) July 126338 (2343.79) 1400 (891.46) 31862 (894.82) 40999 (328.52) 611 (527.42) 6334 (215.18) 48238 (2578.07) 4598 (2898.66) 28795 (450.82) 20417 (723.89) 1611 (216.18) 12862 (945.3) 8824 (228.64) 108873 (1611.44) 19171 (537.01) 18213 (213.37) 247357 (2008.68) 1387 (448.64) 770 (228.71) 248 (200.12) 1234 (548.52) 24812 (535.25) 2760 (1952.54) 10551 (350.05) 24075 (297.1) 564 (817.09) 155692 (2000.12) 46364 (1177.87) 3603 (864.07) 61969 (260.5) 4302 (382.37) 51629 (518.32) Cumulative 140933 (2614.55) 1591 (1013.08) 40168 (1128.09) 50987 (408.55) 1051 (907.23) 9192 (312.27) 135598 (7247.0) 5913 (3727.66) 61438 (961.89) 34965 (1239.69) 2564 (344.07) 20359 (1496.29) 11314 (293.15) 124115 (1837.03) 23614 (661.47) 31806 (372.61) 422118 (3427.83) 2621 (847.8) 823 (244.45) 408 (329.23) 1693 (752.55) 31877 (687.65) 3474 (2457.66) 16119 (534.78) 42083 (519.33) 652 (944.58) 245859 (3158.47) 62703 (1592.95) 4996 (1198.14) 85461 (359.26) 7183 (638.44) 70188 (704.63) medRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.08.17.20176537; this version posted August 21, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license . Table 2: Monthly Covid-19 deaths, absolute numbers and (deaths/million) in various states of India State Andhra Pradesh Arunachal Pradesh Assam Bihar Chandigarh Chattisgarh Delhi Goa Gujarat Haryana Himachal Pradesh Jammu & Kashmir Jharkhand Karnataka Kerala Madhya Pradesh Maharashtra Manipur Meghalaya Mizoram Nagaland Orissa Pondicherry Punjab Rajasthan Sikkim Tamil Nadu Telangana Tripura Uttar Pradesh Uttarakhand West Bengal Feb/March 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 1 (0.01) 0 (0) 0 (0) 2 (0.11) 0 (0) 6 (0.09) 0 (0) 1 (0.13) 2 (0.15) 0 (0) 3 (0.04) 2 (0.06) 5 (0.06) 10 (0.08) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 4 (0.13) 0 (0) 0 (0) 1 (0.01) 6 (0.15) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 3 (0.03) April 31 (0.58) 0 (0) 1 (0.03) 1 (0.01) 0 (0) 0 (0) 57 (3.05) 0 (0) 208 (3.26) 4 (0.14) 1 (0.13) 6 (0.44) 3 (0.08) 19 (0.28) 2 (0.06) 133 (1.56) 448 (3.64) 0 (0) 1 (0.3) 0 (0) 0 (0) 1 (0.02) 0 (0) 16 (0.53) 58 (0.72) 0 (0) 26 (0.33) 22 (0.56) 0 (0) 40 (0.17) 0 (0) 30 (0.3) May 31 (0.58) 0 (0) 2 (0.06) 21 (0.17) 4 (3.45) 1 (0.03) 414 (22.13) 0 (0) 824 (12.9) 16 (0.57) 4 (0.54) 20 (1.47) 2 (0.05) 29 (0.43) 6 (0.17) 213 (2.5) 1827 (14.84) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 8 (0.17) 0 (0) 25 (0.83) 136 (1.68) 0 (0) 149 (1.91) 54 (1.37) 0 (0) 177 (0.74) 5 (0.44) 284 (2.85) 12 June 125 (2.32) 1 (0.64) 8 (0.22) 45 (0.36) 2 (1.73) 12 (0.41) 2269 (121.27) 3 (1.89) 810 (12.68) 216 (7.66) 3 (0.4) 73 (5.37) 10 (0.26) 197 (2.92) 15 (0.42) 222 (2.6) 5569 (45.22) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 23 (0.5) 12 (8.49) 99 (3.28) 219 (2.7) 0 (0) 1025 (13.17) 178 (4.52) 1 (0.24) 480 (2.02) 36 (3.2) 351 (3.52) July 1162 (21.56) 2 (1.27) 91 (2.56) 230 (1.84) 9 (7.77) 41 (1.39) 1221 (65.26) 42 (26.48) 592 (9.27) 185 (6.56) 4 (0.54) 276 (20.28) 91 (2.36) 2073 (30.68) 49 (1.37) 295 (3.46) 7139 (57.97) 5 (1.62) 4 (1.19) 0 (0) 4 (1.78) 182 (3.93) 37 (26.18) 242 (8.03) 267 (3.29) 1 (1.45) 2734 (35.12) 259 (6.58) 20 (4.8) 933 (3.92) 39 (3.47) 913 (9.17) Cumulative 1349 (25.03) 3 (1.91) 102 (2.86) 298 (2.39) 15 (12.95) 54 (1.83) 3963 (211.8) 45 (28.37) 2440 (38.2) 421 (14.93) 13 (1.74) 377 (27.71) 106 (2.75) 2321 (34.35) 74 (2.07) 868 (10.17) 14993 (121.75) 5 (1.62) 5 (1.49) 0 (0) 4 (1.78) 214 (4.62) 49 (34.66) 386 (12.81) 680 (8.39) 1 (1.45) 3935 (50.55) 519 (13.19) 21 (5.04) 1630 (6.85) 80 (7.11) 1581 (15.87) medRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.08.17.20176537; this version posted August 21, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license . Table 3: Correlation of state-level covid-19 cases/million and deaths/million with various sociodemographic indices (Pearson’s correlation) in July 2020 Source Urbanization index (UI) Human development index (HDI) Census of India Government of India Social development index (SDI) Government of India Sociodemographic index (SI) Global Burden of Disease study Epidemiological transition index (ETI) Global Burden of Disease Study Healthcare availability index (HAI) Niti Aayog, Government of India Healthcare access and quality index Global Burden (HAQI) of Disease study Vulnerability index (VI) Population Council, India p<0.05, ** p<0.01 13 Cases/million Deaths/million 0.65** 0.42** 0.60** 0.32 -0.20 -0.13 0.60** 0.50** -0.44** -0.30 0.12 0.11 0.50** 0.35 0.01 0.13 medRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.08.17.20176537; this version posted August 21, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license . Figure 1: Absolute number of cumulative covid-19 cases and deaths in various states (July 2020) Covid-19 Deaths, Numbers Covid-19 Cases, Numbers Maharashtra Tamil Nadu Andhra Pradesh Delhi Karnataka Uttar Pradesh West Bengal Telangana Gujarat Bihar Rajasthan Assam Haryana Orissa Madhya Pradesh Kerala Jammu and Kashmir Punjab Jharkhand Chattisgarh Uttrakhand Goa Tripura Pondicherry Manipur Himachal Pradesh Nagaland Arunachal Pradesh Chandigarh Meghalaya Sikkim Mizoram 140933 135598 124115 85461 70188 62703 61438 50987 42083 40168 34965 31877 31806 23614 20359 16119 11314 9192 7183 5913 4996 3474 2621 2564 1693 1591 1051 823 652 408 0 100000 200000 422118 245859 300000 Maharashtra Delhi Tamil Nadu Gujarat Karnataka Uttar Pradesh West Bengal Andhra Pradesh Madhya Pradesh Rajasthan Telangana Haryana Punjab Jammu and Kashmir Bihar Orissa Jharkhand Assam Uttrakhand Kerala Chattisgarh Pondicherry Goa Tripura Chandigarh Himachal Pradesh Meghalaya Manipur Nagaland Arunachal Pradesh Sikkim Mizoram 2440 2321 1630 1581 1349 868 680 519 421 386 377 298 214 106 102 80 74 54 49 45 21 15 13 5 5 4 3 1 0 0 400000 14 2000 14993 3963 3935 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000 14000 16000 medRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.08.17.20176537; this version posted August 21, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license . Figure 2: Covid-19 cumulative cases and deaths per million in various states (July 2020) Cases per million population Delhi Goa Maharashtra Tamil Nadu Andhra Pradesh Puducherry Karnataka Telangana Jammu and Kashmir Haryana Tripura Assam Arunachal Pradesh Gujarat Sikkim Chandigarh Manipur Nagaland West Bengal Orissa Kerala Uttrakhand Punjab Rajasthan Bihar Madhya Pradesh Uttar Pradesh Himachal Pradesh Mizoram Chattisgarh Jharkhand Meghalaya 1837 1593 1496 1240 1198 1128 1015 962 945 907 848 753 705 688 661 638 535 519 409 373 359 344 329 311 293 244 0 1000 2000 7247 3728 3427 3158 2614 2458 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 15 8000 Delhi Maharashtra Tamil Nadu Gujarat Puducherry Karnataka Goa Jammu and Kashmir Andhra Pradesh West Bengal Haryana Telangana Chandigarh Punjab Madhya Pradesh Rajasthan Uttrakhand Uttar Pradesh Tripura Orissa Assam Jharkhand Bihar Kerala Arunachal Pradesh Chattisgarh Nagaland Himachal Pradesh Manipur Meghalaya Sikkim Mizoram Deaths per million population 0 50 211.8 121.8 50.6 38.2 34.7 34.4 28.3 27.7 25.1 15.9 14.9 13.2 12.9 12.8 10.2 8.4 7.1 6.9 5.0 4.6 2.9 2.7 2.4 2.1 1.9 1.8 1.8 1.7 1.6 1.5 1.4 0 100 150 200 250 medRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.08.17.20176537; this version posted August 21, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license . Figure 3: Trends in monthly cases/million and deaths/million in rapidly increasing states from Feb/March to July 2020 4000.00 140.00 3500.00 120.00 thn 3000.00 o M /n 2500.00 oli li M / 2000.00 se sa C 91 1500.00 idv oC 1000.00 100.00 h tn o 80.00 /M n o liil M /s 60.00 h ta e D 40.00 20.00 500.00 0.00 0.00 April Delhi Tamil Nadu Karnataka Haryana May Goa Andhra Pradesh Telangana June July April Maharashtra Pondicherry Jammu and Kashmir Delhi Gujarat Goa West Bengal 16 May Maharashtra Pondicherry Jammu and Kashmir June Tamil Nadu Karnataka Andhra Pradesh July medRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.08.17.20176537; this version posted August 21, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license . Figure 4: Association of Covid-19 cases and deaths/million with urbanization index (logarithmic regression) 8000 250 7000 200 no 6000 il i 5000 M /s es aC 4000 91 -d 3000 iv oC 2000 no ill i 150 M /e ta R tha 100 eD y = 1592.ln(x) - 4166. R² = 0.352 y = 41.14ln(x) - 120.2 R² = 0.278 50 1000 0 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 0 20 40 60 Urbanization Index % Urbanization Index % 17 80 100 medRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.08.17.20176537; this version posted August 21, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license . Figure 5: End-of-month logarithmic association of covid-19 cases/million and deaths/million with urbanization for April-July 2020 May'20 April'20 June'20 July'20 4000.00 1000.00 1000.00 4000.00 y = 4.88x - 83.65 R² = 0.37 y = 1.05x - 18.13 R² = 0.38 y = 18.74x - 341.17 R² = 0.38 y = 19.76x + 158.08 R² = 0.29 750.00 750.00 3000.00 3000.00 no liil M /e500.00 ta R es aC 500.00 2000.00 2000.00 250.00 250.00 1000.00 1000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 20 40 60 80 Urbanization Index % 100 0 40 60 80 0.00 0 100 200 May’20 April’20 y = 0.015x - 0.041 R² = 0.104 20 40 60 80 100 0 Urbanization Index % Urbanization Index % 50 50 20 June’20 40 60 80 100 July’20 200 y = 19.13ln(x) - 58.45 R² = 0.211 y = 4.177ln(x) - 12.26 R² = 0.203 20 Urbanization Index % y = 41.14ln(x) - 120.2 R² = 0.278 150 150 no ill i M /e ta25 R ht ae D 100 100 50 0 50 Urbanization Index % 100 0 0 0 0 50 0 50 Urbanization Index % 18 100 0 50 100 Urbanization Index % 0 50 100 Urbanization Index % medRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.08.17.20176537; this version posted August 21, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license . Supplementary Table 1: Demographic and social indices of various states State Population 2020 Data source Andhra Pradesh Arunachal Pradesh Assam Bihar Chandigarh Chhattisgarh Delhi Goa Gujarat Haryana Himachal Pradesh Jammu & Kashmir Jharkhand Karnataka Kerala Madhya Pradesh Maharashtra Manipur Meghalaya Mizoram Nagaland Orissa Pondicherry Punjab Rajasthan Sikkim Tamil Nadu Telangana Tripura Uttar Pradesh Uttarakhand West Bengal 53903393 1570458 35607039 124799926 1158473 29436231 18710922 1586250 63872399 28204692 7451955 13606320 38593948 67562686 35699443 85358965 123144223 3091545 3366710 1239244 2249695 46356334 1413542 30141373 81032689 690251 77841267 39362732 4169794 237882725 11250858 99609303 Urbanizatio n index Epidemiologica l transition index Human developmen t index Sociodemographi c index Social Developmen t Index Health care availability index Census of India Global Burden of Disease Study Government of India Government of India Niti Aayog, Governmen t of India 33.49 0.37 0.640 Global Burden of Disease Study 0.585 56.13 22.67 0.55 0.660 0.589 14.08 0.62 0.614 11.3 0.74 0.576 Healthcar e access & quality index Vulnerabilit y index Population Council, India 65.13 Global Burden of Disease Study 46.5 55.24 46.07 44.3 0.029 0.562 48.53 48.85 34.0 0.257 0.440 44.89 32.11 37.0 0.971 0.714 97.25 -- 0.775 -- -- 63.62 54.3 0.086 23.24 0.6 0.613 0.558 56.69 53.36 37.4 0.314 97.50 0.38 0.746 0.752 60.17 49.42 56.2 0.514 62.17 0.21 0.761 0.738 63.39 51.9 64.8 0.314 42.58 0.46 0.672 0.615 56.65 63.52 45.0 0.771 34.79 0.4 0.708 0.655 57.37 53.51 45.0 0.400 10.04 0.3 0.720 0.669 65.39 62.41 51.7 0.057 27.21 0.34 0.688 0.598 55.41 62.37 46.7 0.714 24.05 0.69 0.599 0.523 47.8 51.33 37.4 0.914 38.57 0.34 0.682 0.614 59.72 61.14 46.6 0.571 47.72 0.16 0.779 0.683 68.09 74.01 63.9 0.314 27.63 0.6 0.606 0.532 55.03 38.39 39.5 1.000 45.23 0.33 0.696 0.666 57.88 63.99 49.8 0.829 30.21 0.42 0.690 0.610 55.5 60.6 44.2 0.543 20.08 0.64 0.656 0.585 53.51 55.95 39.6 0.286 51.51 0.53 0.705 0.630 62.89 74.97 48.9 0.143 28.97 0.47 0.679 0.661 56.76 38.51 46.1 0.657 16.68 0.58 0.606 0.547 51.64 35.97 36.3 0.800 68.31 -- 0.738 -- -- 49.69 -- 0.200 37.49 0.29 0.720 0.650 62.18 63.01 49.5 0.429 24.89 0.66 0.629 0.530 52.31 43.1 40.7 0.686 24.97 0.45 0.716 0.632 62.72 50.51 50.5 0.000 48.45 0.26 0.708 0.648 65.34 60.41 51.2 0.571 48.45 0.38 0.669 0.609 -- 59 48.5 0.943 26.18 0.45 0.663 0.573 53.22 46.38 42.3 0.629 22.28 0.68 0.596 0.508 50.96 28.61 34.9 0.886 30.55 0.46 0.684 0.639 64.23 40.2 43.2 0.429 31.87 0.33 0.641 0.580 54.37 57.17 47.1 0.829 19