doi:10.1093/brain/awaa429 BRAIN 2021: 144; 391–401 | 391 UPDATE Hearing and dementia: from ears to brain Jeremy C. S. Johnson,1 Charles R. Marshall,1,2 Chris J. D. Hardy1,† and Jason D. Warren1,† These authors contributed equally to this work. The association between hearing impairment and dementia has emerged as a major public health challenge, with significant opportunities for earlier diagnosis, treatment and prevention. However, the nature of this association has not been defined. We hear with our brains, particularly within the complex soundscapes of everyday life: neurodegenerative pathologies target the auditory brain, and are therefore predicted to damage hearing function early and profoundly. Here we present evidence for this proposition, based on structural and functional features of auditory brain organization that confer vulnerability to neurodegeneration, the extensive, reciprocal interplay between ‘peripheral’ and ‘central’ hearing dysfunction, and recently characterized auditory signatures of canonical neurodegenerative dementias (Alzheimer’s disease, Lewy body disease and frontotemporal dementia). Moving beyond any simple dichotomy of ear and brain, we argue for a reappraisal of the role of auditory cognitive dysfunction and the critical coupling of brain to peripheral organs of hearing in the dementias. We call for a clinical assessment of real-world hearing in these diseases that moves beyond pure tone perception to the development of novel auditory ‘cognitive stress tests’ and proximity markers for the early diagnosis of dementia and management strategies that harness retained auditory plasticity. 1 Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK 2 Preventive Neurology Unit, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK 3 Movement Disorders Centre, Department of Clinical and Movement Neurosciences, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK 4 Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK 5 UCL Ear Institute and UCL/UCLH Biomedical Research Centre, National Institute for Health Research, University College London, London, UK Correspondence to: Prof Jason Warren Dementia Research Centre UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology University College London 8–11 Queen Square London WC1N 3BG, UK E-mail: jason.warren@ucl.ac.uk Keywords: hearing; dementia; Alzheimer’s disease; frontotemporal dementia; Lewy body disease Introduction: scope and nature of the problem Hearing impairment in later life is a major clinical issue and a leading association of cognitive decline (Gates and Mills, 2005; Lin et al., 2011; Loughrey et al., 2018), presenting significant potential opportunities for dementia diagnosis, treatment and prevention (Dawes et al., 2015; Taljaard et al., 2016; Livingston et al., 2017). But how are hearing impairment and dementia related? Hearing loss of any Received August 14, 2020. Revised October 2, 2020. Accepted October 17, 2020. Advance access publication December 22, 2020 C The Author(s) (2020). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Guarantors of Brain. V This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/brain/article/144/2/391/6044086 by guest on 22 May 2021 † Rimona S. Weil,1,3,4 Doris-Eva Bamiou,5 392 | BRAIN 2021: 144; 391–401 manifestation of canonical dementia syndromes. We propose a roadmap for future work directed towards developing novel auditory cognitive tests, biomarkers and therapies. The auditory brain: structural and functional substrates for neurodegeneration The auditory system has evolved to allow adaptive behavioural responses to complex, dynamic acoustic environments (Griffiths et al., 2001; Pickles, 2015). However, its structural and functional characteristics confer specific vulnerabilities to neurodegenerative pathologies. Anatomically, the hierarchy of auditory processing relays and in particular the large-scale cerebral networks that process sound information (Fig. 2) are highly distributed. The spread of pathogenic proteins in neurodegenerative dementias (Fig. 2) targets these networks rather than the peripheral organs of hearing. Though histopathological data remain limited, neurodegenerative pathologies may preferentially involve auditory association cortex and cortico-cortical projections rather than primary sensory cortex (Esiri et al., 1986; Lewis et al., 1987), thereby striking the integrative mechanisms that are most critical for auditory object analysis. Accurate auditory signal transduction (for example, during spatial hearing or speech perception) depends on precise integration of frequency-based (spectral) and time-based (temporal) information (Griffiths et al., 2001; Bizley et al., 2009): any pathology that damages relevant neural circuits is likely to disrupt such processing early in its course. As the auditory signal passes up the processing hierarchy, it is transformed non-linearly such that it is no longer a direct replica of the incoming signal encoded at the periphery (Wang, 2007; Gaucher et al., 2013); due to the intrinsically temporal nature of sound, this transformation of auditory information is particularly evident in the time domain and supports the extraction of invariant auditory object features and cross-modal integration. The resulting percept is normally robust to noisy variations in the sensory signal; however, its non-linear nature means that even small perturbations of neural circuit function due to neurodegenerative disease may have disproportionately large perceptual and behavioural consequences. Two additional, related guiding principles of auditory system operation that are critical for adaptive functioning in complex, dynamic auditory environments are functional plasticity and reciprocity. Reciprocity is mediated by recursive, afferent-efferent feedback that supports auditory change detection and topdown tracking of behaviourally relevant sound sources (Shamma and Micheyl, 2010; Zion Golumbic et al., 2013), as well as predictive decoding and ‘filling-in’ of ambiguous and varying auditory inputs, such as degraded speech (Malmierca, 2014; Simon, 2015; Donhauser and Baillet, 2020) (Fig. 1). Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/brain/article/144/2/391/6044086 by guest on 22 May 2021 cause tends to limit social engagement and quality of life (Graydon et al., 2019), amplifies the effects of cognitive impairment and may confound or delay diagnosis of dementia (Panza et al., 2015; Wayne and Johnsrude, 2015). Conversely, diagnosis of hearing loss and compliance with hearing aids are hindered by cognitive impairment (Dawes et al., 2015). There may, however, be a more fundamental pathophysiological basis for the association: hearing is a complex cognitive function that, alongside other cognitive functions, is directly vulnerable to the pathophysiological processes that cause dementia (Wayne and Johnsrude, 2015; Hardy et al., 2016). Recent studies addressing the link between hearing impairment and dementia have focused predominantly on audiometric pure tone detection, the ability to detect quiet sounds (Lin et al., 2011; Loughrey et al., 2018). However, most natural auditory environments or ‘scenes’ comprise mixtures of sounds that change over time, and listening—perception and understanding of sounds—is a highly active cognitive process (Bendixen, 2014) (Fig. 1). Consider, for example, the everyday scenario of following a conversation in a crowded room. After substantial ‘pre-cognitive’ processing in the auditory brainstem (Cope et al., 2015), the incoming auditory signal must be deconstructed (by ‘auditory scene analysis’) (Goll et al., 2012a; Golden et al., 2015c; Hardy et al., 2016) into discrete and stable percepts or ‘auditory objects’ corresponding to voices and speech features, separate from background noise (Griffiths and Warren, 2004; Goll et al., 2010b). Such auditory objects must be matched to stored representations and expectations to achieve recognition and ultimately, an appropriate behavioural response. These processes collectively constitute ‘auditory cognition’ (Fig. 1) and depend critically on neural computations in auditory cortical and linked processing networks: the auditory brain (Fig. 2). Evidence that neurodegenerative pathologies target the auditory brain and produce ‘central’ hearing deficits disproportionate to any peripheral hearing loss was first produced some time ago (Kurylo et al., 1993; Strouse et al., 1995). More recently, a diverse array of ‘central’ auditory deficits has been described in these diseases (Mahoney et al., 2011; Rohrer et al., 2012; Fletcher et al., 2015, Golden et al., 2015c; Grube et al., 2016; Hardy et al., 2016; Eversfield and Orton, 2019; Jafari et al., 2020), ranging widely beyond ‘deafness’ (impaired sound detection) to encompass altered auditory perception, understanding and behavioural responses, with far-reaching consequences for hearing function in daily life. To date, however, the role of the auditory brain in linking hearing impairment to cognitive decline has been largely overlooked. Here we argue that the auditory brain is integral to the development and expression of hearing impairment in dementia. Our case rests on three interwoven lines of evidence: the structural and functional characteristics of auditory brain organization targeted by neurodegenerative diseases; the known extensive interplay between so-called ‘peripheral’ and ‘central’ hearing mechanisms; and mounting data on auditory cognitive dysfunction as a prominent, early and specific J. C. S. Johnson et al. Hearing and dementia: from ears to brain BRAIN 2021: 144; 391–401 | 393 Plasticity (for example, perceptual learning of degraded speech) (Hardy et al., 2018) enables dynamic neural adaptation to auditory experience. These functional principles are evident throughout the auditory system (Russo et al., 2005; Barascud et al., 2016; Guinan, 2018) and are highly sensitive to synaptic neurochemical (particularly cholinergic) modulation, especially under challenging listening conditions (Dhanjal et al., 2013; Kuchibhotla et al., 2017; Minces et al., 2017). They are therefore potentially highly susceptible to neurodegenerative pathologies that disrupt synaptic and neurotransmitter pathway integrity. Moreover, the characteristics of non-linear stimulus coding, extensive efferent regulation of afferent pathways and pervasive plasticity (though not specific to audition) are much more marked in the auditory system than in other sensory systems, notably vision (King and Nelken, 2009). Impaired functional adaptation of auditory brainstem pathways has perceptual consequences in patients with mild cognitive impairment (Bidelman et al., 2017), suggesting that indices of auditory plasticity may be sensitive and dynamic markers of neurodegenerative pathologies. ‘Peripheral’ and ‘central’ hearing: a false dichotomy and a double hit The anatomical and functional interactions of auditory processing stages (Figs 1 and 2) suggest that any sharp distinction between ‘peripheral’ and ‘central’ hearing is likely to be a false dichotomy. Pure tone audiometry (PTA), the Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/brain/article/144/2/391/6044086 by guest on 22 May 2021 Figure 1 Processes and interactions in ‘peripheral’ and ‘central’ hearing. The functional organization of the auditory processing hierarchy and the interplay of hearing with more general cognitive functions. Ellipses indicate the broad domains of peripheral hearing (blue; anatomically, the peripheral hearing apparatus which receives incoming sounds, cochlea and auditory nerve), precognitive auditory processing (green; chiefly the auditory brainstem), auditory cognition (yellow; auditory cortex and its cerebral connections) and general cognitive functions (red; see Fig. 2 for neuroanatomy). Listed within the ellipses are some key stages in the analysis of auditory information: ‘peripheral’ and ‘central’ hearing processes lie on a functional and anatomical continuum, with reciprocal connections between successive processing stages (black arrows). This organization implies that pathologies (such as neurodegenerative proteinopathies) predominantly targeting auditory cognitive (and general cognitive) processing stages may have cascading effects at other processing stages. Certain additional functional properties that operate across auditory processing stages, such as non-linear signal coding and plasticity, are likely to be particularly vulnerable to the effects of neurodegenerative pathologies (see text). External red and blue arrows here signify general mechanisms by which hearing dysfunction of any cause may promote cognitive decline, and the converse; these mechanisms are likely to be mutually reinforcing and may additionally compound more specific effects of auditory brain dysfunction, with the potential to establish pathophysiological ‘vicious cycling.’ 394 | BRAIN 2021: 144; 391–401 J. C. S. Johnson et al. pinning hearing (Fig. 1) as spheres overlaid in a left lateral view of the brain. These regions are anatomically and functionally linked into large-scale, distributed networks. The colour convention follows that in Fig. 1 (green, precognitive auditory processing in brainstem pathways, enclosed by the grey filled outline; yellow, auditory cognition in auditory cortices; red, general cognitive processes in connected cerebral regions); note, however, that there is no simple, one-to-one correspondence between particular brain regions and individual ‘tiers’ of the processing hierarchy outlined in Fig. 1. Brain regions are designated as follows: ATL = antero-mesial temporal lobe (also encompassing amygdala and hippocampus); CN = cochlear nucleus (ventral and dorsal); HG = Heschl’s gyrus (medial portion contains primary auditory cortex); IC = inferior colliculus; IFG = inferior frontal gyrus (closely associated with insular cortex, deep to the cerebral surface); IPL = inferior parietal lobe; ITC = inferior temporal cortex; MGB = medial geniculate body; MTG = middle temporal gyrus; OFC = orbitofrontal cortex; PFC = prefrontal cortex; SO = superior olive (its main projection in the lateral lemniscus has several additional, small associated nuclei); STG = superior temporal gyrus; TPJ = temporo-parietal junctional cortex. Also shown in grey filled outline is the cingulate gyrus, projected from the medial surface of each cerebral hemisphere: this signifies linked deep medial prefrontal and parietal cortices that also participate importantly in integrative and modulatory cognitive processes relevant to hearing. (B) Key components of the brain networks implicated in hearing that are also predominantly targeted in representative neurodegenerative proteinopathies. These patterns of brain degeneration anticipate the differential involvement of particular auditory functions and therefore distinctive functional hearing profiles or ‘auditory phenotypes’ of these disorders (see text and Table 1). Although the neuroanatomical patterns shown correspond to the distribution of most severe regional brain atrophy in each disease, dysfunction predates atrophy and additional connected brain regions may also be implicated in the pathogenesis of auditory symptoms. AD = typical Alzheimer’s disease; nfvPPA = non-fluent agrammatic variant primary progressive aphasia; svPPA = semantic variant primary progressive aphasia. mainstay of standard clinical audiological assessment, is generally interpreted as an index of ‘peripheral’ (cochlea and auditory nerve) hearing. However, PTA thresholds are affected by attention (Musiek et al., 2017), executive function (Gates et al., 2010) and brainstem pathologies that do not directly involve the cochlea (Cope et al., 2015), reflecting the known role of top-down influences on cochlear sensitivity (Terreros and Delano, 2015). Furthermore, PTA does not fully predict ability to hear speech in noise (the principal hearing complaint of older listeners) (Anderson et al., 2011; Guest et al., 2018; Holmes and Griffiths, 2019). Conversely, ‘central’ hearing functions that rely on high-fidelity signal coding at brainstem level (such as speech intelligibility) are tuned by efferent synaptic functional adaptation at the cochlea (Pressnitzer et al., 2008) and auditory agnosia is modulated by peripheral hearing loss (Coebergh et al., 2020). Neurodegenerative diseases that principally involve cortical and subcortical pathways may therefore significantly impact hearing functions canonically attributed to the peripheral sense organs; indeed, elevated PTA thresholds have recently been documented in the non-fluent agrammatic variant of primary progressive aphasia (nfvPPA), a primary cortical degeneration (Hardy et al., 2019). On the other hand, anatomical involvement of subcortical auditory relays by neurodegenerative pathology does not necessarily lead to a perceptual deficit (Hughes et al., 2014). Moreover, neurodegenerative diseases typically target the ageing brain, and healthy ageing itself affects multiple stages Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/brain/article/144/2/391/6044086 by guest on 22 May 2021 Figure 2 The auditory brain in health and neurodegenerative disease. (A) Major anatomical regions that mediate the processes under- Hearing and dementia: from ears to brain BRAIN 2021: 144; 391–401 | 395 Table 1 Auditory phenotypes of some major dementia syndromes Syndrome Core clinical features Alzheimer’s disease Typical Episodic/topographical memory loss, parietal deficits Auditory deficitsa Proposed auditory diagnostic testb Pathological neuroanatomyc Difficulty tracking sound sources/information in busy acoustic environments, auditory disorientation, difficulty understanding less familiar accents, auditory agnosia, increased sound sensitivity Similar or more severe than typical AD Scene analysis, localization, attention, melody contour, accents, environmental sound recognition, working memory Auditory stream separation, sound localization/motion detectioni, DLT1,2,3,4 Posterior cingulate, precuneus, lateral temporo-parietal cortex More severe involvement of auditory scene /spatial processing Phoneme perception, prosody perception, working memory Pure tone detection, complex tone perception, auditory scene analysis, rhythm perception, speech loudness perception Auditory stream separation, sound localization/motion detectioni,j,2,5 j Phoneme discriminationj,6 Sinewave speech comprehensionk,7,8 Cortico-subcortical circuits Pure tone detection, perception of pitch interval/timbre/ rhythm/prosody, accent comprehension Environmental sound/ voice recognition, emotional recognition/reactivity, hedonic valuation, integration of semantic/affective information Emotional recognition/ reactivity, hedonic valuation, voice recognitionf, integration of semantic/affective information Temporal pattern discrimination9 Peri-Sylvian networks, prefrontal cortex Environmental sound recognition10 Auditory/multimodal association cortex in anterior temporal lobe, orbitofrontal cortex, insula Vocal emotion recognition11 Auditory/multimodal association cortex in anterior temporal lobe, orbitofrontal cortex, insula, anterior cingulate, striatal circuits PCAd Visuo-perceptual/visuospatial, other parietal deficits LPAd Anomia, phonological and verbal working memory deficits Fluctuating alertness/attention/executive deficits, visuo-perceptual deficits, visual hallucinations, REM sleep behaviour disorder, parkinsonism Similar or more severe than typical AD Speech production deficits, agrammatism Agnosia for environmental sounds/ accents, word deafnessf svPPA Anomia and vocabulary loss, visual agnosias, behavioural changes similar to bvFTD Musicophilia/sound aversiong, tinnitus, phonagnosia/nonverbal sound agnosia bvFTD Socio-emotional, executive dysfunction with disinhibition, apathy, loss of empathy, obsessions and rituals, dietary and other behavioural abnormalities Sound aversion/musicophiliag, phonagnosiah LBDe FTD nfvPPA Auditory hallucinations The table summarizes major clinical features, and auditory cognitive deficits, candidate auditory cognitive tests for early diagnosis and neuroanatomical associations in canonical dementia syndromes for which adequate data are available (see also Fig. 3). a Auditory domains affected based on behavioural test performance; bBased currently on experimental studies (examples referenced below) with a view (particularly for Alzheimer’s disease) to potential scalability, e.g. online administration, but provisional and require further clinical validation; cMajor distribution of pathological changes in brain networks relevant to auditory deficits, as assessed using voxel-based morphometry, functional neuroimaging (chiefly functional MRI) and/or post-mortem material; dUnderpinned by Alzheimer pathology in majority of cases; eIncludes dementia with Lewy bodies and Parkinson’s disease dementia; fNot usually severe; gAssociated with altered autonomic responses to sound; hParticularly associated with right temporal lobe atrophy; iCan be delivered via headphones using virtual space stimuli; jOther auditory abnormalities analogous to typical Alzheimer’s disease; kProcessing of degraded (e.g. sinewave-transformed) speech that is subject to perceptual learning and modulated by neurotransmitter function, by analogy with tests on degraded visual stimuli that show promise for diagnosis of LBD. AD = Alzheimer’s disease; bvFTD = behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia; DLT = dichotic listening test; FTD = frontotemporal dementia; LBD = Lewy body disease; LPA = logopenic aphasia; nfvPPA = non-fluent agrammatic variant of progressive non-fluent aphasia; PCA = posterior cortical atrophy; svPPA = semantic variant of primary progressive aphasia. Examples of experimental studies using proposed tests: 1Goll et al., 2012a; 2Golden et al., 2015c; 3Tuwaig et al., 2017; 4Gates et al., 2011; 5Hardy et al., 2020; 6Johnson et al., 2020; 7 Weil et al., 2017; 8Hardy et al., 2017c; 9Grube et al., 2016; 10Golden et al., 2015b; 11Omar et al., 2011. Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/brain/article/144/2/391/6044086 by guest on 22 May 2021 Key auditory symptoms 396 | BRAIN 2021: 144; 391–401 J. C. S. Johnson et al. of auditory processing, ranging from cochlea to cortex (Bendixen, 2014; Bidelman et al., 2014; Roth, 2015; Henry et al., 2017; Zhao et al., 2019). Some of these effects (in particular, degeneration of synapses between inner hair cells and auditory nerve fibres) are undetectable or ‘hidden’ on standard PTA and may therefore be underestimated (Wu et al., 2019); other effects (such as attentional suppression of irrelevant sensory information) may only emerge under challenging listening conditions or for particular tasks, such as tracking fine-grained temporal information in speech (Henry et al., 2017). Increased cognitive effort and engagement of task-relevant capacities (in auditory cortex or executive control systems) may compensate to a degree for the widespread effects of ageing on auditory signal processing (Profant et al., 2015; Meister et al., 2016; Glick and Sharma, 2017; Bidelman et al., 2019); however, if compensatory mechanisms are compromised by neurodegenerative pathology, this ‘double hit’ may cause hearing loss to become functionally significant. Such decompensation would be relatively more likely under adverse listening conditions. Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/brain/article/144/2/391/6044086 by guest on 22 May 2021 Figure 3 A pathophysiological synthesis of hearing impairment and dementia. This figure schematizes proposed relations between development of peripheral hearing loss (blue), changes in auditory cognition (gold) and general cognitive function (red) and underlying neurodegeneration (black), based on emerging epidemiological and pathophysiological evidence. Hearing loss can be considered a potential causal risk factor for cognitive decline (Risk), a proximity marker for incipient dementia (Proximity) or a feature of the established dementia syndrome (Phenotype), according to the time window in which it occurs; the mechanisms of these effects are distinct but likely to be interdependent. Alzheimer’s disease has been the major focus of epidemiological studies assessing the risk of developing dementia in association with hearing loss (Lin et al., 2011; Taljaard et al., 2016; Livingston et al., 2017; Loughrey et al., 2018), though the distinction from cerebrovascular and other pathologies is problematic; midlife hearing loss may account for 10% of all cases of dementia, and has been proposed to have a direct potentiating effect (arrow) on the evolution of neurodegeneration. Though the mechanism of this linkage is unclear, animal models suggest it could occur via cellular effects such as oxidative stress or altered gene expression (Frenzilli et al., 2017; Park et al., 2018), changes in neural circuit function (Oxtoby et al., 2017; Bidelman et al., 2019) or a complex interaction between aberrant circuit activity and protein spread (Griffiths et al., 2020). However, a direct causal effect has not been established: for example, peripheral hearing function was not associated with brain amyloid deposition (a relatively specific preclinical marker of Alzheimer’s disease) in a large cohort of cognitively healthy older people (Parker et al., 2020) and such an effect would still not account for the majority of cases of dementia with hearing alterations. Here we suggest that alterations in ‘central’ hearing or auditory cognition may constitute an early warning signal of incipient dementia, due to the computational demands imposed by listening in challenging everyday acoustic environments. In support of this idea, predominantly central auditory deficits (involving, for example, dichotic listening) have been shown to predict CSF tau levels and regional atrophy profiles consistent with Alzheimer’s disease pathology in cross-sectional studies (Tuwaig et al., 2017) and longitudinal development of a clinical syndrome compatible with Alzheimer’s disease (Gates et al., 2011), while large genetic and neuropathological surveys have suggested changes in hearing (in particular, speech-in-noise perception) may be a preclinical marker of neurodegeneration (Brenowitz et al., 2020a, b). We emphasize that deficits of peripheral and central hearing and more general cognitive functions are likely to interact strongly, with ‘vicious cycling’. Hearing and dementia: from ears to brain In this context, neurodegenerative effects on auditory brain function might act as ‘proximity makers’ for incipient, more generalized cognitive decline. Major dementias have diverse auditory phenotypes Alzheimer’s disease Alzheimer’s disease produces a core impairment of auditory scene analysis, not attributable to more elementary deficits of sound perception or generic cognitive capacities (Idrizbegovic et al., 2011). Auditory scene processing deficits may predate onset of more generalized cognitive decline in people at risk of developing Alzheimer’s disease (Golob et al., 2009; Gates et al., 2011) and in both the typical amnestic and posterior cortical (visuospatial) syndromic presentations of Alzheimer’s disease (Goll et al., 2012a; Golden et al., 2015c; Hardy et al., 2020), suggesting that such deficits are a functional marker of Alzheimer’s disease pathology. This interpretation would corroborate neuroanatomical findings linking impaired auditory scene analysis to dysfunction and atrophy of the temporo-parietal ‘default mode’ network that is essential to Alzheimer’s disease pathogenesis (Warren et al., 2012; Goll et al., 2012a; Golden et al., 2015a, c) (Fig. 2). More generally, auditory phenotypic features of Alzheimer’s disease may signify a unifying deficit in encoding sound sources and patterns as distinct auditory objects (Griffiths and Warren, 2004; Goll et al., 2010b, 2011; Hailstone et al., 2012; Hardy et al., 2017b). Such a deficit might ultimately underpin environmental sound agnosia in Alzheimer’s disease (Coebergh et al., 2020) and impaired phonological processing (most saliently in the logopenic variant) (Johnson et al., 2020), amplified by abnormalities of auditory working memory (Dhanjal et al., 2013). Lewy body disease Auditory dysfunction is prevalent in the Lewy body disease (LBD) spectrum (Parkinson’s disease and dementia with Lewy bodies) and may be a marker of disease onset, evolution and severity (Seifan et al., 2019; Jafari et al., 2020). Diverse auditory phenomena have been reported, ranging from auditory hallucinations to impairments of auditory scene analysis, tone and rhythm processing (Mollaei et al., 2019; Cochen De Cock et al., 2020; Jafari et al., 2020). Electrophysiologically, there is evidence of impaired auditory | 397 startle, deviance detection, habituation and sensory filtering (Perriol, 2005; Jafari et al., 2020) as well as olivocochlear efferent pathway dysfunction (De Keyser et al., 2019). The unifying deficit may be dynamic disruption of synaptic transmission at multiple levels of the auditory hierarchy (Jafari et al., 2020), due to abnormal top-down, neuromodulatory (principally dopaminergic) regulation. Frontotemporal dementias Auditory perceptual dysfunction is emerging as a core feature of nfvPPA (Goll et al., 2010a, 2011; Golden et al., 2016; Grube et al., 2016; Hardy et al., 2019), including deficits of rhythm, pitch and timbre perception (Goll et al., 2010a, 2011; Grube et al., 2016) and sound detection (Hardy et al., 2019). The key mechanism is likely to be impaired auditory pattern analysis in peri-Sylvian and connected prefrontal regions that govern expectations about incoming sensory traffic (Cope et al., 2017; Hardy et al., 2017a, b) (Fig. 2). In contrast, semantic variant PPA typically spares elementary auditory pattern perception, leading instead to degraded semantic analysis of environmental sounds, voices and affective auditory signals (Bozeat et al., 2000; Goll et al., 2010a, b, 2012b; Hailstone et al., 2011; Fletcher et al., 2015; Golden et al., 2015b; Muhammed et al., 2018). This profile reflects selective degeneration and functional reorganization of antero-medial temporal lobe (Fig. 2) and its connections, including orbitofrontal cortices and auditory thalamus. In the behavioural variant of frontotemporal dementia, inappropriate emotional reactions to voices, environmental sounds and music are often prominent (Omar et al., 2011; Fletcher et al., 2015): these are likely to be driven by impaired valuation and regularity decoding in complex auditory environments, linked to dysfunction of neural circuits mediating reward and rule processing (Clark et al., 2017, 2018). Hearing impairment: cause, canary or corollary of dementia? The complex pathophysiological relations between hearing impairment and dementia (schematized in Fig. 3) remain to be fully defined. Impoverished sensory fidelity due to peripheral hearing loss or disturbed subcortical auditory trafficking will potentially have effects both on auditory cognition and more general cognitive functions such as attention, executive processing and perceptual learning (Loughrey et al., 2018; Fig. 1), leading to ‘vicious cycling’. Hearing loss might therefore produce both syndromic and generic cognitive signatures. The balance of these is likely to depend on stimulus and task demands as well as the particular neurodegenerative process. Emerging epidemiological evidence suggests Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/brain/article/144/2/391/6044086 by guest on 22 May 2021 The neurodegenerative diseases that cause canonical dementia syndromes have specific profiles of large-scale, corticosubcortical network involvement, determined by the patterns of spread of pathogenic proteins (Seeley et al., 2009; Warren et al., 2013) (examples in Fig. 2). These pathologies have correspondingly diverse clinical phenotypes including prominent auditory cognitive deficits (Table 1). BRAIN 2021: 144; 391–401 398 | BRAIN 2021: 144; 391–401 that hearing impairment may potentiate neurodegeneration, perhaps via an interaction of aberrant auditory activity with culprit proteinopathies in vulnerable neural circuits (Griffiths et al., 2020) (Fig. 3). Indeed, hearing impairment might constitute a facilitating cause of neurodegenerative disease evolution, an early warning ‘canary’ for impending cognitive disaster or an accompaniment of established dementia: these non-exclusive mechanisms would have mutually reinforcing consequences for auditory brain function. The balance of neuroanatomical, physiological and clinical evidence suggests that the auditory brain plays a key role in the increasingly well documented association between dementia and hearing impairment. Degeneration of central auditory processing mechanisms (in particular, auditory cognitive dysfunction) will tend to amplify any degree of peripheral deafness and reduce compensatory capacity under natural (noisy) listening conditions. This reflects the extensive reciprocal interplay between afferent and efferent auditory processing pathways, exquisitely vulnerable to neurodegenerative proteinopathies. Moreover, neurodegenerative pathologies have distinct and relatively specific auditory cognitive phenotypes as well as generic effects on cognitive functions relevant to hearing, in line with the large-scale neural network signatures of these diseases. The synthesis we propose has neurobiological, diagnostic and management implications that should be tackled in future work. Neurobiologically, central auditory dysfunction is likely to be a fundamental, early consequence of neurodegenerative dementias, due both to direct involvement of susceptible auditory processing networks by pathogenic protein spread and remote effects on highly interconnected structures. This requires substantiation using physiologically grounded neuroimaging techniques such as functional MRI and magnetoencephalography that may also help clarify the neural mechanisms of compensatory and therapeutic effects. Detailed, longitudinal disease phenotyping with biomarker and ultimately histopathological support (accounting for healthy auditory ageing and comorbid disease) will be required to elucidate the auditory pathophysiological signatures of particular proteinopathies, to assess the relative importance of hearing impairment in different diseases and to clarify the role of peripheral hearing deficits in potentiating the neurodegenerative process (Griffiths et al., 2020). Diagnostically, hearing impairment might plausibly constitute a proximity marker for incipient cognitive decline and dementia, reflecting the heavy computational demands that auditory signal processing imposes on failing neural circuits. If substantiated in longitudinal studies of at-risk populations, this would raise the exciting prospect of novel auditory ‘cognitive stress tests’ for detecting the early stages of neurodegeneration and identifying dynamic, physiological biomarkers of disease evolution, residual plasticity and therapeutic response (Hardy et al., 2018). Such markers could represent red flags for targeting population-based screening and recruitment into dementia prevention trials from primary care settings and could be developed into ‘digital biomarkers’ that are highly scalable. For example, headphone-based tests of spatial hearing, degraded speech perception and dichotic listening could be performed online (Gates et al., 2011; Golden et al., 2015c). In addition, developing a toolkit of novel tests to quantify the relative contributions of peripheral and central auditory deficits would allow accurate characterization of auditory phenotypes in individual patients and could facilitate diagnosis of particular neurodegenerative pathologies (Table 1). It will be crucial to capture the real-world impact of central hearing impairment, which is likely to be more profound than would be predicted by the degree of any peripheral hearing loss. Management approaches that focus solely on peripheral sound amplification are likely to be of limited efficacy for improving hearing function in dementia. There is a clear practical and pathophysiological motivation to address any potentially reversible component of peripheral hearing loss and ensuring compliance with hearing aids (Proctor et al., 2020). Ultimately, however, the goal of management should be to minimize hearing-related disability in the complex listening environments of daily life—to treat the patient, not the audiogram or the neuropsychological test score. Personalized interventions directed to central auditory mechanisms such as ‘smart’ hearing aids (Koohi et al., 2017), hearing-based behavioural therapies and auditory cognitive rehabilitation (Russo et al., 2005) should be combined with education and environmental modification supported by a detailed assessment of functional disability. Pharmacological modulation of cholinergic and dopaminergic function to harness auditory plasticity has shown early promise in Alzheimer’s disease and LBD (Dhanjal et al., 2013; Hardy et al., 2017c; Jafari et al., 2020): such approaches could herald a new era of physiologically informed, integrated management focusing on retained capacity rather than deficits and embracing both central and peripheral auditory impairment in dementia. Funding The Dementia Research Centre is supported by Alzheimer’s Research UK, Brain Research Trust, and The Wolfson Foundation. This work was supported by the Alzheimer’s Society, Alzheimer’s Research UK and the National Institute for Health Research University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre. J.C.S.J. is supported by an Association of British Neurologists Clinical Research Training Fellowship, funded by Guarantors of Brain. C.R.M. is supported by a grant from Bart’s Charity. R.S.W. is supported by a Wellcome Clinical Research Career Development Fellowship (201567/Z/16/Z). D.E.B. is Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/brain/article/144/2/391/6044086 by guest on 22 May 2021 Conclusions: a synthesis and future view J. C. S. Johnson et al. Hearing and dementia: from ears to brain supported by a BRC Hearing and Deafness grant. C.J.D.H. is supported by an Action on Hearing Loss-Dunhill Medical Trust Pauline Ashley Fellowship. J.D.W. receives grant support from Action on Hearing Loss, Alzheimer’s Research UK, Alzheimer’s Society, Guarantors of Brain, Brain Research UK, MRC, Wellcome Trust, and the Wolfson Foundation. Competing interests The authors report no competing interests. Anderson S, Parbery-Clark A, Yi H-G, Kraus N. A neural basis of speech-in-noise perception in older adults. Ear Heart 2011; 32: 750–7. Barascud N, Pearce MT, Griffiths TD, Friston KJ, Chait M. Brain responses in humans reveal ideal observer-like sensitivity to complex acoustic patterns. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2016; 113: E616–25. Bendixen A. Predictability effects in auditory scene analysis: a review. Front Neurosci 2014; 8: 60. Bidelman GM, Lowther JE, Tak SH, Alain C. Mild cognitive impairment is characterized by deficient brainstem and cortical representations of speech. J Neurosci 2017; 37: 3610–20. Bidelman GM, Mahmud MS, Yeasin M, Shen D, Arnott SR, Alain C. Age-related hearing loss increases full-brain connectivity while reversing directed signaling within the dorsal–ventral pathway for speech. Brain Struct Funct 2019; 224: 2661–76. Bidelman GM, Villafuerte JW, Moreno S, Alain C. Age-related changes in the subcortical-cortical encoding and categorical perception of speech. Neurobiol Aging 2014; 35: 2526–40. Bizley JK, Walker KMM, Silverman BW, King AJ, Schnupp JWH. Interdependent encoding of pitch, timbre, and spatial location in auditory cortex. J Neurosci 2009; 29: 2064–75. Bozeat S, Lambon Ralph MA, Patterson K, Garrard P, Hodges JR. Non-verbal semantic impairment in semantic dementia. Neuropsychologia 2000; 38: 1207–15. Brenowitz WD, Besser LM, Kukull WA, Keene CD, Glymour MM, Yaffe K. Clinician-judged hearing impairment and associations with neuropathologic burden. Neurology 2020; 95: e1640–9. Brenowitz WD, Filshtein TJ, Yaffe K, Walter S, Ackley SF, Hoffmann TJ, et al. Association of genetic risk for Alzheimer disease and hearing impairment. Neurology 2020; 95: e2225. Clark CN, Golden HL, McCallion O, Nicholas JM, Cohen MH, Slattery CF, et al. Music models aberrant rule decoding and reward valuation in dementia. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci 2018; 13: 192–202. Clark CN, Nicholas JM, Agustus JL, Hardy CJD, Russell LL, Brotherhood EV, et al. Auditory conflict and congruence in frontotemporal dementia. Neuropsychologia 2017; 104: 144–56. Cochen De Cock V, Verbizier D, Picot MC, Damm L, Abril B, Galtier F, et al. Rhythm disturbances as a potential early marker of Parkinson’s disease in idiopathic REM sleep behavior disorder. Ann Clin Transl Neurol 2020; 7: 280–7. Coebergh JAF, McDowell S, van Woerkom TCAM, Koopman JP, Mulder J, Bruijn SFTM. Auditory agnosia for environmental sounds in Alzheimer’s disease: not hearing and not listening? J Alzheimers Dis 2020; 73: 1407–19. Cope TE, Baguley DM, Griffiths TD. The functional anatomy of central auditory processing. Pract Neurol 2015; 15: 302–8. Cope TE, Sohoglu E, Sedley W, Patterson K, Jones PS, Wiggins J, et al. Evidence for causal top-down frontal contributions to predictive processes in speech perception. Nat Commun 2017; 8: 2154. | 399 Dawes P, Emsley R, Cruickshanks KJ, Moore DR, Fortnum H, Edmondson-Jones M, et al. Hearing loss and cognition: the role of hearing AIDS, social isolation and depression. PLoS One 2015; 10: e0119616. De Keyser K, De Letter M, De Groote E, Santens P, Talsma D, Botteldooren D, et al. Systematic audiological assessment of auditory functioning in patients with Parkinson’s disease. J Speech Lang Heart Res 2019; 62: 4564–77. Dhanjal NS, Warren JE, Patel MC, Wise RJS. Auditory cortical function during verbal episodic memory encoding in Alzheimer’s disease. Ann Neurol 2013; 73: 294–302. Donhauser PW, Baillet S. Two distinct neural timescales for predictive speech processing. Neuron 2020; 105: 385–93.e9. Esiri MM, Pearson RCA, Powell TPS. The cortex of the primary auditory area in Alzheimer’s disease. Brain Res 1986; 366: 385–7. Eversfield CL, Orton LD. Auditory and visual hallucination prevalence in Parkinson’s disease and dementia with Lewy bodies: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychol Med 2019; 49: 2342–53. Fletcher PD, Downey LE, Golden HL, Clark CN, Slattery CF, Paterson RW, et al. Auditory hedonic phenotypes in dementia: a behavioural and neuroanatomical analysis. Cortex 2015; 67: 95–105. Frenzilli G, Ryskalin L, Ferrucci M, Cantafora E, Chelazzi S, Giorgi FS, et al. Loud noise exposure produces dna, neurotransmitter and morphological damage within specific brain areas. Front Neuroanat 2017; 11: 49. Gates G, Mills J. Presbycusis. Lancet 2005; 366: 1111–20. Gates GA, Anderson ML, McCurry SM, Feeney MP, Larson EB. Central auditory dysfunction as a harbinger of Alzheimer dementia. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2011; 137: 390. Gates GA, Gibbons LE, McCurry SM, McCusrry SM, Crane PK, Feeney MP, et al. Executive dysfunction and presbycusis in older persons with and without memory loss and dementia. Cogn Behav Neurol 2010; 23: 218–23. Gaucher Q, Huetz C, Gourévitch B, Laudanski J, Occelli F, Edeline JM. How do auditory cortex neurons represent communication sounds? Heart Res 2013; 305: 102–12. Glick H, Sharma A. Cross-modal plasticity in developmental and agerelated hearing loss: clinical implications. Heart Res 2017; 343: 191–201. Golden HL, Agustus JL, Goll JC, Downey LE, Mummery CJ, Schott JM, et al. Functional neuroanatomy of auditory scene analysis in Alzheimer’s disease. NeuroImage Clin 2015a; 7: 699–708. Golden HL, Clark CN, Nicholas JM, Cohen MH, Slattery CF, Paterson RW, et al. Music perception in dementia. J Alzheimers Dis 2016; 55: 933–49. Golden HL, Downey LE, Fletcher PD, Mahoney CJ, Schott JM, Mummery CJ, et al. Identification of environmental sounds and melodies in syndromes of anterior temporal lobe degeneration. J Neurol Sci 2015b; 352: 94–8. Golden HL, Nicholas JM, Yong KXX, Downey LE, Schott JM, Mummery CJ, et al. Auditory spatial processing in Alzheimer’s disease. Brain 2015c; 138: 189–202. Goll JC, Crutch SJ, Loo JHY, Rohrer JD, Frost C, Bamiou DE, et al. Non-verbal sound processing in the primary progressive aphasias. Brain 2010a; 133: 272–85. Goll JC, Crutch SJ, Warren JD. Central auditory disorders: toward a neuropsychology of auditory objects. Curr Opin Neurol 2010b; 23: 617–27. Goll JC, Kim LG, Hailstone JC, Lehmann M, Buckley A, Crutch SJ, et al. Auditory object cognition in dementia. Neuropsychologia 2011; 49: 2755–65. Goll JC, Kim LG, Ridgway GR, Hailstone JC, Lehmann M, Buckley AH, et al. Impairments of auditory scene analysis in Alzheimer’s disease. Brain 2012a; 135: 190–200. Goll JC, Ridgway GR, Crutch SJ, Theunissen FE, Warren JD. Nonverbal sound processing in semantic dementia: a functional MRI study. Neuroimage 2012b; 61: 170–80. Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/brain/article/144/2/391/6044086 by guest on 22 May 2021 References BRAIN 2021: 144; 391–401 400 | BRAIN 2021: 144; 391–401 disease and in mild cognitive impairment. Age Ageing 2011; 40: 249–54. Jafari Z, Kolb BE, Mohajerani MH. Auditory dysfunction in Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord 2020; 35: 537–50. Johnson JCS, Jiang J, Bond RL, Benhamou E, Requena-Komuro M, Russell LL, et al. Impaired phonemic discrimination in logopenic variant primary progressive aphasia. Ann Clin Transl Neurol 2020; 7: 1252–7. King AJ, Nelken I. Unraveling the principles of auditory cortical processing: can we learn from the visual system? Nat Neurosci 2009; 12: 698–701. Koohi N, Vickers D, Warren J, Werring D, Bamiou D-E. Long-term use benefits of personal frequency-modulated systems for speech in noise perception in patients with stroke with auditory processing deficits: a non-randomised controlled trial study. BMJ Open 2017; 7: e013003. Kuchibhotla KV, Gill JV, Lindsay GW, Papadoyannis ES, Field RE, Sten TAH, et al. Parallel processing by cortical inhibition enables context-dependent behavior. Nat Neurosci 2017; 20: 62–71. Kurylo DD, Corkin S, Allard T, Zatorre RJ, Growdon JH. Auditory function in Alzheimer’s disease. Neurology 1993; 43: 1893. Lewis D, Campbell M, Terry R, Morrison J. Laminar and regional distributions of neurofibrillary tangles and neuritic plaques in Alzheimer’s disease: a quantitative study of visual and auditory cortices. J Neurosci 1987; 7: 1799–808. Lin FB, Metter J, O’Brien R, Resnick SM, Zonderman AB, Ferrucci L, et al. Hearing loss and incident dementia. Johns Hopkins Med 2011; 68: 214–20. Livingston G, Sommerlad A, Orgeta V, Costafreda SG, Huntley J, Ames D, et al. Dementia prevention, intervention, and care. Lancet 2017; 390: 2673–734. Loughrey DG, Kelly ME, Kelley GA, Brennan S, Lawlor BA. Association of age-related hearing loss with cognitive function, cognitive impairment, and dementia a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2018; 144: 115–26. Mahoney CJ, Rohrer JD, Goll JC, Fox NC, Rossor MN, Warren JD. Structural neuroanatomy of tinnitus and hyperacusis in semantic dementia. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2011; 82: 1274–8. Malmierca MS, Sanchez-Vives MV, Escera C, Bendixen A. Neuronal adaptation, novelty detection and regularity encoding in audition. Front Syst Neurosci 2014; 8: 111. Meister H, Schreitmüller S, Ortmann M, Rählmann S, Walger M. Effects of hearing loss and cognitive load on speech recognition with competing talkers. Front Psychol 2016; 7: 301. Minces V, Pinto L, Dan Y, Chiba AA. Cholinergic shaping of neural correlations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2017; 114: 5725–30. Mollaei F, Shiller DM, Baum SR, Gracco VL. The relationship between speech perceptual discrimination and speech production in Parkinson’s disease. J Speech Lang Heart Res 2019; 62: 4256–68. Muhammed L, Hardy CJD, Russell LL, Marshall CR, Clark CN, Bond RL, et al. Agnosia for bird calls. Neuropsychologia 2018; 113: 61–7. Musiek FE, Shinn J, Chermak GD, Bamiou D-E. Perspectives on the pure-tone audiogram. J Am Acad Audiol 2017; 28: 655–71. Omar R, Henley SMD, Bartlett JW, Hailstone JC, Gordon E, Sauter DA, et al. The structural neuroanatomy of music emotion recognition: evidence from frontotemporal lobar degeneration. Neuroimage 2011; 56: 1814–21. Oxtoby NP, Garbarino S, Firth NC, Warren JD, Schott JM, Alexander DC. Data-driven sequence of changes to anatomical brain connectivity in sporadic Alzheimer’s disease. Front Neurol 2017; 8: 580. Panza F, Solfrizzi V, Seripa D, Imbimbo BP, Capozzo R, Quaranta N, et al. Age-related hearing impairment and frailty in Alzheimer’s disease: interconnected associations and mechanisms. Front Aging Neurosci 2015; 7: 2020–28. Park SY, Kim MJ, Kim HL, Kim DK, Yeo SW, Park SN. Cognitive decline and increased hippocampal p-tau expression in mice with hearing loss. Behav Brain Res 2018; 342: 19–26. Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/brain/article/144/2/391/6044086 by guest on 22 May 2021 Golob EJ, Ringman JM, Irimajiri R, Bright S, Schaffer B, Medina LD, et al. Cortical event-related potentials in preclinical familial Alzheimer disease. Neurology 2009; 73: 1649–55. Graydon K, Waterworth C, Miller H, Gunasekera H. Global burden of hearing impairment and ear disease. J Laryngol Otol 2019; 133: 18–25. Griffiths TD, Lad M, Kumar S, Holmes E, McMurray B, Maguire EA, et al. How can hearing loss cause dementia? Neuron 2020; 108: 401–12. Griffiths TD, Uppenkamp S, Johnsrude I, Josephs O, Patterson RD. Encoding of the temporal regularity of sound in the human brainstem. Nat Neurosci 2001; 4: 633–7. Griffiths TD, Warren JD. What is an auditory object? Nat Rev Neurosci 2004; 5: 887–92. Grube M, Bruffaerts R, Schaeverbeke J, Neyens V, De Weer AS, Seghers A, et al. Core auditory processing deficits in primary progressive aphasia. Brain 2016; 139: 1817–29. Guest H, Munro KJ, Prendergast G, Millman RE, Plack CJ. Impaired speech perception in noise with a normal audiogram: no evidence for cochlear synaptopathy and no relation to lifetime noise exposure. Heart Res 2018; 364: 142–51. Guinan JJ. Olivocochlear efferents: their action, effects, measurement and uses, and the impact of the new conception of cochlear mechanical responses. Heart Res 2018; 362: 38–47. Hailstone JC, Ridgway GR, Bartlett JW, Goll JC, Buckley AH, Crutch SJ, et al. Voice processing in dementia: a neuropsychological and neuroanatomical analysis. Brain 2011; 134: 2535–47. Hailstone JC, Ridgway GR, Bartlett JW, Goll JC, Crutch SJ, Warren JD. Accent processing in dementia. Neuropsychologia 2012; 50: 2233–44. Hardy CJD, Agustus JL, Marshall CR, Clark CN, Russell LL, Bond RL, et al. Behavioural and neuroanatomical correlates of auditory speech analysis in primary progressive aphasias. Alzheimers Res Ther 2017a; 9: 53. Hardy CJD, Agustus JL, Marshall CR, Clark CN, Russell LL, Brotherhood EV, et al. Functional neuroanatomy of speech signal decoding in primary progressive aphasias. Neurobiol Aging 2017b; 56: 190–201. Hardy CJD, Frost C, Sivasathiaseelan H, Johnson JCS, Agustus JL, Bond RL, et al. Findings of impaired hearing in patients with nonfluent/agrammatic variant primary progressive aphasia. JAMA Neurol 2019; 76: 607. Hardy CJD, Hwang YT, Bond RL, Marshall CR, Ridha BH, Crutch SJ, et al. Donepezil enhances understanding of degraded speech in Alzheimer’s disease. Ann Clin Transl Neurol 2017c; 4: 835–40. Hardy CJD, Marshall CR, Bond RL, Russell LL, Dick K, Ariti C, et al. Retained capacity for perceptual learning of degraded speech in primary progressive aphasia and Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Res Ther 2018; 10: 70. Hardy CJD, Marshall CR, Golden HL, Clark CN, Mummery CJ, Griffiths TD, et al. Hearing and dementia. J Neurol 2016; 263: 2339–54. Hardy CJD, Yong KXX, Goll JC, Crutch SJ, Warren JD. Impairments of auditory scene analysis in posterior cortical atrophy. Brain 2020; 143: 2689–95. Henry MJ, Herrmann B, Kunke D, Obleser J. Aging affects the balance of neural entrainment and top-down neural modulation in the listening brain. Nat Commun 2017; 8: 15801. Holmes E, Griffiths TD. ‘Normal’ hearing thresholds and fundamental auditory grouping processes predict difficulties with speech-in-noise perception. Sci Rep 2019; 9: 16771. Hughes LE, Rowe JB, Ghosh BCP, Carlyon RP, Plack CJ, Gockel HE. The binaural masking level difference: cortical correlates persist despite severe brain stem atrophy in progressive supranuclear palsy. J Neurophysiol 2014; 112: 3086–94. Idrizbegovic E, Hederstierna C, Dahlquist M, Kampfe Nordstrom C, Jelic V, Rosenhall U. Central auditory function in early Alzheimer’s J. C. S. Johnson et al. Hearing and dementia: from ears to brain | 401 Strouse AL, Hall JW, Burger MC. Central auditory processing in Alzheimer’s disease. Ear Heart 1995; 16: 230–8. Taljaard DS, Olaithe M, Brennan-Jones CG, Eikelboom RH, Bucks RS. The relationship between hearing impairment and cognitive function: a meta-analysis in adults. Clin Otolaryngol 2016; 41: 718–29. Terreros G, Delano PH. Corticofugal modulation of peripheral auditory responses. Front Syst Neurosci 2015; 9: 2019–30. Tuwaig M, Savard M, Jutras B, Poirier J, Collins DL, Rosa-Neto P; for the PREVENT-AD Research Group, et al. Deficit in central auditory processing as a biomarker of pre-clinical Alzheimer’s disease. J Alzheimers Dis 2017; 60: 1589–600. Wang X. Neural coding strategies in auditory cortex. Heart Res 2007; 229: 81–93. Warren JD, Fletcher PD, Golden HL. The paradox of syndromic diversity in Alzheimer disease. Nat Rev Neurol 2012; 8: 451–64. Warren JD, Rohrer JD, Schott JM, Fox NC, Hardy J, Rossor MN. Molecular nexopathies: a new paradigm of neurodegenerative disease. Trends Neurosci 2013; 36: 561–9. Wayne RV, Johnsrude IS. A review of causal mechanisms underlying the link between age-related hearing loss and cognitive decline. Ageing Res Rev 2015; 23: 154–66. Weil RS, Pappa K, Schade RN, Schrag AE, Bahrami B, Schwarzkopf DS, et al. The cats-and-dogs test: A tool to identify visuoperceptual deficits in Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord 2017; 32: 1789–90. doi: 10.1002/mds.27176. Wu PZ, Liberman LD, Bennett K, de Gruttola V, O’Malley JT, Liberman MC. Primary neural degeneration in the human cochlea: evidence for hidden hearing loss in the aging ear. Neuroscience 2019; 407: 8–20. Zhao S, Bury G, Milne A, Chait M. Pupillometry as an objective measure of sustained attention in young and older listeners. Trends Heart 2019; 23: 233121651988781. Zion Golumbic EM, Ding N, Bickel S, Lakatos P, Schevon CA, McKhann GM, et al. Mechanisms underlying selective neuronal tracking of attended speech at a “cocktail party”. Neuron 2013; 77: 980–91. Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/brain/article/144/2/391/6044086 by guest on 22 May 2021 Parker T, Cash DM, Lane C, Lu K, Malone IB, Nicholas JM, et al. Pure tone audiometry and cerebral pathology in healthy older adults. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2020; 91: 172–6. Perriol M-P. Disturbance of sensory filtering in dementia with Lewy bodies: comparison with Parkinson’s disease dementia and Alzheimer’s disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2005; 76: 106–8. Pickles JO, Auditory pathways: anatomy and physiology. 1st edn. Oxford: Elsevier B.V.; 2015. Pressnitzer D, Sayles M, Micheyl C, Winter IM. Perceptual organization of sound begins in the auditory periphery. Curr Biol 2008; 18: 1124–8. Proctor D, Bamiou D-E, Karia D, Lewis G, Livingston G, Omar RZ, et al. Identifying and treating hearing loss in mild cognitive impairment: a feasibility study for an interventional trial with hearing aids. Int Psychogeriatr 2020; 32: 537–8. Profant O, Tintera J, Balogová Z, Ibrahim I, Jilek M, Syka J. Functional changes in the human auditory cortex in ageing. PLoS One 2015; 10: e0116692. Rohrer JD, Sauter D, Scott S, Rossor MN, Warren JD. Receptive prosody in nonfluent primary progressive aphasias. Cortex 2012; 48: 308–16. Roth TN, Aging of the auditory system. 1st edn. Oxford: Elsevier B.V.; 2015. Russo NM, Nicol TG, Zecker SG, Hayes EA, Kraus N. Auditory training improves neural timing in the human brainstem. Behav Brain Res 2005; 156: 95–103. Seeley WW, Crawford RK, Zhou J, Miller BL, Greicius MD. Neurodegenerative diseases target large-scale human brain networks. Neuron 2009; 62: 42–52. Seifan A, Ganzer CA, Ryon K, Lin M, Mahmudur R, Adolfo H, et al. Detecting non-cognitive Features of Prodromal Neurodegenerative Diseases. Cas 2019; 11: 242–9. Shamma SA, Micheyl C. Behind the scenes of auditory perception. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2010; 20: 361–6. Simon JZ. The encoding of auditory objects in auditory cortex: insights from magnetoencephalography. Int J Psychophysiol 2015; 95: 184–90. BRAIN 2021: 144; 391–401