ARTICLE IN PRESS
Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 322 (2010) 1589–1591
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jmmm
Cooling by adiabatic pressure application in La0.7Ca0.3MnO3 magnetocaloric
effect material
R. Szymczak a, R. Kolano b, A. Kolano-Burian b, J. Pietosa a, H. Szymczak a,
a
b
Institute of Physics, Polish Academy of Sciences, al.Lotnikow 32/46, Warsaw, Poland
Institute of Non-Ferrous Metals, Sowinskiego
5, 44-101 Gliwice, Poland
a r t i c l e in fo
abstract
Available online 9 September 2009
The effect of hydrostatic pressure on Curie temperature, the critical exponents and entropy change in
La0.7Ca0.3MnO3 are determined. The pressure increases the Curie temperature. The combined magnetic
entropy change, due to both magnetic field and pressure application, is found to be significant. It suggests
that manganites are suitable candidates as barocaloric refrigerants near room-temperature region.
& 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Keywords:
Magnetocaloric effect
Magnetic refrigeration
Manganite
1. Introduction
Recently, there has been an upsurge of interest in the
development of a new magnetic refrigeration technology, based
on magnetocaloric effect, as a promising alternative to the
conventional gas compression technique. A number of new
materials with large magnetocaloric effect have been discovered
but the search is still on materials with even higher values of the
magnetocaloric effect to use in magnetic refrigerators. Recently, it
has been shown that manganites are good candidates to work as
magnetic refrigerants at room-temperature region [1]. We have
shown [2] that the changes in entropy near Curie temperature (TC)
depend strongly on various extrinsic factors. These results suggest
that the magnitude of the magnetocaloric effect should depend
strongly on methods of sample preparation. We have performed
detailed studies on the magnetocaloric effect for La1 xCaxMnO3
with x= 0.3, 0.35 and 0.4 prepared by nonstandard ceramic
method. It was shown that in this case the sharpness of the
paramagnetic to ferromagnetic transition increases with Ca
doping. In all studied samples paramagnetic–ferromagnetic
transition is very narrow but no hysteresis was observed and
the transitions were identified as second-order ones. Accordingly,
the values of the critical exponents were determined for these
transitions. The maximum entropy change detected in La0.7Ca0.3MnO3 for a field of 2 T reaches 8 J/kg K, which exceeds that of
gadolinium. It is the highest value ever observed for doped
LaMnO3 manganites. The values of the critical exponents of
La0.7Ca0.3MnO3 (b =0.5 and g =1) are satisfactorily described in
frames of the mean field model.
Corresponding author.
E-mail address: szymh@ifpan.edu.pl (H. Szymczak).
0304-8853/$ - see front matter & 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.jmmm.2009.09.020
An alternative technique for clean cooling devices was
proposed by Müller et al. [3]. This technique is based on the
barocaloric effect. The basic principle is analogous to cooling by
the magnetocaloric effect; however, for the barocaloric effect an
entropy change is realized by the application of external pressure.
In this paper we report on first measurements of the impact of
hydrostatic pressure on magnetocaloric effect in La0.7Ca0.3MnO3
manganite. Since the paramagnetic–ferromagnetic transition in
this manganite is very narrow the effect of pressure on Curie
temperature was expected to be high.
Though the pressure dependence of magnetic properties has
been studied in manganites [4–12], to the best of our knowledge
this is the first report on the influence of pressure on magnetocaloric effect and on the barocaloric effect in this group of materials.
2. Experimental
Details on the preparation and characterization of La0.7Ca0.3MnO3
manganite can be found in Ref. [2]. A miniature hydrostatic pressure
cell was used for magnetization measurements in a commercial
(Quantum Design Ltd.) SQUID magnetometer. The pressure value
was determined at low temperatures using the known pressure
dependence of the critical temperature of the superconducting state
of a Pb sensor placed inside the cell. The magnetization has been
measured under pressure up to 11 kbar at temperatures from 4.2 to
300 K and in magnetic fields up to 50 kOe.
Fig. 1 shows the temperature dependence of the zero field
cooled (ZFC) and field cooled (FC) magnetization of La0.7Ca0.3MnO3
in a field of 20 Oe at ambient pressure and for an applied pressure
of 11 kbar. As seen in the figure, the paramagnetic to ferromagnetic
transition is very sharp and the sharpness increases with pressure.
The Curie temperature, TC, determined by the inflection point in
the low-field (H=20 Oe) M–T curve, was found to be 250 and
ARTICLE IN PRESS
1590
R. Szymczak et al. / Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 322 (2010) 1589–1591
La0.7 Ca0.3 MnO3
P = 11 kbar
50 kO e
H = 20 Oe
ZFC
FC
0.1
P = 11 kbar
P=0
−ΔS mag [J/(kg K)]
M/H [emu/(g Oe)]
8
La0.7 Ca0.3 MnO3
0.2
6
20
4
10
2
0.0
200
250
5
300
2
T [K]
0
Fig. 1. Temperature dependence of the ZFC and FC magnetization in a field of 20 Oe
at ambient pressure and for applied pressure of 11 kbar for the La0.7Ca0.3MnO3.
275
270
280
T [K]
Fig. 3. Magnetic entropy changes for La0.7Ca0.3MnO3 under magnetic field
variation DH for applied pressure of 11 kbar.
8
La0.7 Ca0.3 MnO3
P=0
relations to isothermal magnetization M(H) measurements
Z H
@M
DSmag ðT; HÞ ¼
dH
@T
0
-ΔS mag [J/(kg K)]
20 kO e
6
10
4
5
2
2
0
240
245
250
255
260
T [K]
performed at ambient pressure and under pressure of 11 kbar.
As expected, |DSmag(T, H)| becomes the maximum at TC where
the magnetization drops rapidly.
Magnetic entropy change in La0.7Ca0.3MnO3 is reported in
Figs. 2 and 3 and shows a decrease in |DSmag| under pressure. At
the same time the width of the peak in DSmag(T, H) dependence
considerably increases under pressure. It means that pressure
increases the refrigerant capacity RC of the system defined as
RC = DS DT, where DT is the operating temperature range. This
effect is important for possible applications of manganites as
magnetic refrigerants.
Fig. 2. Magnetic entropy changes for La0.7Ca0.3MnO3 under magnetic field
variation DH at ambient pressure.
3. Discussion and conclusions
268.5 K for samples at ambient pressure and for applied pressure
of 11 kbar, respectively. Although the sharpness of the transition
indicates a first-order character there is no thermal hysteresis
characteristic of this type of transition. It is possible to resolve the
above ambiguity applying the Banerjee criterion [13], according
to which the negative slope of the H/M versus M2 plot implies that
the system possesses a first-order phase transition, whereas
a positive slope corresponds to a second-order magnetic phase
transition. Examining the slope of the H/M versus M2 plots
(not shown here) indicates the second-order character of
this transition. Therefore, it may be characterized by critical
exponents. The critical exponents at ambient pressure were
determined to be b =0.2 and g =1.7 and for applied pressure of
11 kbar, b =0.1 and g =2. Such a small value of b indicates that
this phase transition can be characterized as nearly first order [14].
The La0.7Ca0.3MnO3 manganites show a large difference between
ZFC and FC magnetization curves, enhanced by applied pressure.
The difference between ZFC and FC magnetization curves arises
due to domain structure and the observed enhancement of this
effect is due to the pressure-induced suppression of magnetic
anisotropy observed also in other manganites [15].
Magnetocaloric effect was determined in this paper by
magnetic entropy change DSmag, obtained by applying the Maxwell
It is commonly accepted that double-exchange interactions
between Mn3 + and Mn4 + ions are responsible for ferromagnetism
in the metallic phase of manganites. The effect of hydrostatic
pressure on the ferromagnetic manganites with strong double
exchange is, at least qualitatively, well understood. As it results
from Fig. 1 the hydrostatic pressure increases TC and consequently
stabilizes ferromagnetic state. The application of pressure induces
the increase in the electronic transfer through the change in the
Mn–O–Mn bond angles and bond lengths.
As a result, the increase in the eg electron bandwidth W,
described by empirical formula WEcos Y/[Mn–O]3.5 where
Y = 12(p-/Mn–O–MnS), /Mn–O–MnS) is the Mn–O–Mn bond
angle and [Mn–O] is the bond length, favors charge delocalization.
This should lead to more pronounced ferromagnetic and metallic
properties and stabilization of the ferromagnetic metal state
through an enhancement of the double-exchange interactions and
finally to an increase in TC under pressure. Nevertheless, although
pressure increases volume of the ferromagnetic phase (determined by the spontaneous moment) the system under pressure
remains inhomogeneous. It is confirmed by magnetization
measurements presented in Figs. 4 and 5 (for comparison).
Although the magnetization reaches a high value indicating
on ferromagnetic ordering, the presence of unsaturated
ARTICLE IN PRESS
R. Szymczak et al. / Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 322 (2010) 1589–1591
60
M [emu/g]
50
La0.7 Ca0.3 MnO3
P = 11 kbar
40
266 k
268
270
272
274
276
278
280
30
20
10
0
0
10
20
30
40
50
H [kOe]
Fig. 4. Magnetization as a function of temperature for La0.7Ca0.3MnO3 under
applied pressure of 11 kbar.
1591
where N is the number of magnetic spins, S is average spin
momentum at magnetic sites, M and TC are magnetization and
Curie temperature for sample under pressure, respectively,
whereas MS is M for T= 0.
The calculations give DSmag = 24.3 J/kg K. This value is rather
high in comparison with the magnetic entropy change due to the
application of magnetic field.
To our knowledge, this is the first time the value of pure
barocaloric effect in manganites has been reported.
In conclusion, the magnetocaloric effect in La0.7Ca0.3MnO3
manganite under hydrostatic pressure has been investigated. It
was shown that the applied pressure itself can be used to change
the entropy of a solid in a significant way, without the need for
magnetic field variation. The results obtained suggest that the
combined effect of magnetic field and applied hydrostatic
pressure on the caloric properties of manganites is very promising
for constructing magnetic refrigerators. Although practical realization of this suggestion is not simple, one should nevertheless
consider manganites to be suitable candidates as barocaloric
refrigerants.
Acknowledgements
This work was partly supported by Ministry of Science and
Higher Education of Poland Project PBZ-KBN-115/T08/2004.
References
Fig. 5. Magnetization as a function of magnetic-field and temperature for
La0.7Ca0.3MnO3 under ambient pressure.
magnetization even at 5 T is an indication of a phase separation
into ferromagnetic and antiferromagnetic domains.
Using the above results one can calculate the magnetic entropy
change DSmag for H= 0 due to the hydrostatic pressure. These
calculations are performed under the assumption that the
pressure has negligible effect on phononic and electronic
contribution to the entropy of the studied system. It seems that
the mean-field approximation is a reasonable method to perform
such estimation. The magnetic entropy change DSmag is calculated
(following [15]) for T= TC, where TC is taken for La0.7Ca0.3MnO3 at
ambient pressure (TC =250 K)
DSmag ¼ Smag ðp; TC Þ Smag ðp ¼ 0; TC Þ
Smag ¼ NkB ½lnð2S þ 1Þ 3=2ðS=S þ1Þs2
9=20½ð2S þ 1Þ4 1=16ðS þ1Þ4 s4
s ¼ M=MS ¼ tan h½3SsTC =ðS þ 1ÞT
[1] M.-H. Phan, S.-C. Yu, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 308 (2007) 325.
[2] R. Szymczak, M. Czepelak, R. Kolano, A. Kolano-Burian, B. Krzymanska,
H. Szymczak, J. Mater. Sci. 43 (2008) 1734.
[3] K.A. Müller, F. Fauth, S. Fischer, M. Koch, A. Furrer, P. Lacorre, Appl. Phys. Lett.
73 (1998) 1056.
[4] H.Y. Hwang, t.T.M. Palstra, S.-W. Cheong, B. Batlogg, Phys. Rev. B 52 (1995)
15046.
[5] D.P. Kozlenko, I.N. Goncharenko, B.N. Savenko, V.I. Voronin, J. Phys.: Condens.
Matter 16 (2004) 6755.
[6] P.G. Radaelli, G. Iannone, M. Marezio, H.Y. Hwang, S.-W. Cheong,
J.D. Jorgensen, D.N. Argyriou, Phys. Rev. B 56 (1997) 8265.
[7] I.M. Fita, R. Szymczak, M. Baran, V. Markovich, R. Puzniak, A. Wisniewski,
S.V. Shiryaev, V.N. Varyukhin, H. Szymczak, Phys. Rev. B 68 (2003) 014436.
[8] S.V. Trukhanov, I.O. Troyanchuk, A.V. Trukhanov, I.A. Bobrikov, V.G. Simkin,
A.M. Balagurov, JETP Lett. 84 (2006) 254.
[9] D.P. Kozlenko, S.V. Trukhanov, E.V. Lukin, I.O. Troyanchuk, B.N. Savenko,
V.P. Glazkov, JETP Lett. 85 (2007) 113.
[10] D.P. Kozlenko, V.P. Glazkov, Z. Jirak, B.N. Savenko, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 16
(2004) 2381.
[11] S.V. Trukhanov, D.P. Kozlenko, A.V. Trukhanov, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 320
(2007) e88.
[12] K. Mydeen, P. Sarkar, P. Mandal, A. Murugeswari, C.Q. Jin, S. Arumugam, Appl.
Phys. Lett. 92 (2008) 182510.
[13] S.K. Banerjee, Phys. Lett. 12 (1964) 16.
[14] G. Xiao, G.Q. Gong, C.L. Canedy, E.J. McNiff, a. Gupta, J. Appl. Phys. 81 (1997) 5324.
[15] V. Markovivh, I. Fita, A.I. Shames, R. Puzniak, E. Rosenberg, C. Martin, A.
Wisniewski, Y. Yuzhelevski, A. Wahl, G. Gorodetsky, Phys. Rev. B 68 (2003)
094428.