Dih

Resumen

Este ensayo aborda la discusión de cómo el derecho internacional de los derechos humanos (DDHH) ha influenciado humanizando a otras disciplinas del conocimiento en derecho internacional como lo es el derecho internacional humanitario (DIH) y el derecho internacional penal (DIP). Se arriba a la conclusión de la noción de humanidad bien sustentada en la costumbre internacional como el punto de conexión entre estas tres disciplinas diferenciadas en derecho objetivo, subjetivo y procesal.
Se sostiene conforme a derecho internacional penal que las violaciones de derechos humanos incluso flagrantes no son crímenes internacionales porque las conductas delictivas se constituyen en tipos penales distintos, con elementos del tipo y del crimen diversos.
De los ámbitos de aplicación en el trabajo de la Corte Penal internacional ratione materiae y ratione personae, se llega a la conclusión de la existencia independiente y paralela de las disciplinas, aunque no excluyente, donde el DDHH es el nuevo watch dog de la sociedad global cuyo escrutinio condiciona inescapablemente al DIH y al DIP. 
Summary

This essay addresses the discussion of how international human rights law (IHRL) has influenced humanizing other disciplines of knowledge in international law such as international humanitarian law (IHL) and international criminal law (ICL). We come to the conclusion of the notion of humanity well supported in international customary law as the point of connection between these three disciplines differentiated in objective, subjective and procedural law. It is held in accordance with the law that even flagrant human rights violations are not international crimes because the criminal conducts are constituted in different criminal types, with elements of the different type and crime. From the fields of application, ratione materiae and ratione personae in the work of the International Criminal Court, we come to the conclusion of the independent and parallel existence of the disciplines although not mutually exclusive, where IHRL is the new “watch dog” of the global society whose scrutiny inevitably conditions IHL and ICL.

Era industrialisasi yang semakin maju maka semakin kompleks permasalahan yang terjadi dalam perselisihan hubungan industrial, maka untuk penyelesaiannya diperlukan institusi atau lembaga yang mendukung mekanisme penyelesaian perselisihan yang cepat, tepat, adil dan murah diluar pengadilan. Undang-Undang No. 22 Tahun 1957 dan Undang-Undang No. 12 Tahun 1964 sudah tidak sesuai lagi dengan perkembangan keadaan dan kebutuhan dewasa ini. Selanjutnya, perlu diterbitkannya Undang-Undang baru karena sejak diberlakukannya Undang-Undang. No.5 Tahun 1986 tentang Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara (PTUN), maka Putusan Panitia Penyelesaian Perselisihan Pusat  (P4P) yang semula bersifat final dapat diajukan gugatan pada Pengadilan Tinggi Tata Usaha Negara (PTTUN) yang selanjutnya dapat dimohonkan Kasasi pada Mahkamah Agung.Dengan berlakunya Undang-Undang No.2 Tahun 2004, terhitung mulai tanggal 14 Januari 2005 (Pasal 126) PERPU No.1 Tahun 2005 Tentang Penundaan Pelaksanaan UU No. 2 Tahun 2004 Tentang ...

This research aims to generate a responsive regional legislation in support of the implementation of regional autonomy. So that the implementation of regional autonomy does not give birth to new problems that can impede development and economic growth of a region. In this legal research used several approach es including; approach primary legislation Law No.32 of 2004 on regional autonomy and Law No.12 of 2011 on the establishment of legislation. O ther approach esare being approached on a case, the historical approach, comparative approaches, and conceptual approaches.

ABSTRACTThe policy to determine the copyright holder on the song unknown its creator according to the Copyright Acts in Indonesia is performed by the State, in which the State holds that copyright consistently based on article 11 paragraph (3) of the Acts Number 19 of 2002 about copyright. The copyright is held by the State and to be the collective property. The protection period is without period of time or unlimited, in which the state is holding the copyright consistently. In Indonesia, the period of time for copyright protection generally is along the life of its creator plus 50 years or 50 years after for the first time it notified or published. This case conducted recalled the developments in trade, industry, and investment fields already such rapid, until need the protection increase for the Creator and Owner of the Related Right by keep pay attention to the vast society interest. The efforts reached for the law enforcement to the infringement to copyright on the song whose c...