The exploratory study sought to establish the state of workplace HIV and AIDS programming interventions in Zimbabwe by assessing the extent to which Zimbabwe Stock Exchange listed Companies in Harare Province complied with International...
moreThe exploratory study sought to establish the state of workplace HIV and AIDS programming interventions in Zimbabwe by assessing the extent to which Zimbabwe Stock Exchange listed Companies in Harare Province complied with International Labor Organization conventions, guidelines, principles as well as provisions of Statutory Instrument 202 of 1998.compelling all Corporate entities to develop and implement comprehensive workplace HIV and AIDS programming interventions. Mandatory workplace HIV and AIDS interventions (WHAIs) were introduced to mitigate the pandemic effects on the most productive population aged between 24 and 49 years infected and affected by HIV and AIDS. An eclectic methodology combining triangulation of
informants, methods, techniques, data collection instruments and data presentation tools was adopted A cross-section of study informants including Company Executives, Human Resource Management practitioners, Workplace HIV programme Focal persons, Peer Educators and Employees constituted the study sample frame of 465 elements. A number of research measurement variables including considering existence of evidence indicating level of corporate policy awareness, management commitment, operational capacities, resource prioritization/availability, mainstreaming and integration activities, leveraging synergies, supporting institutions, enabling policy frames, integrated programming monitoring and evaluation systems, sufficient government incentives. The study concluded that Workplace HIV and AIDS Interventions (WHAIs) were generally weak, fragmented, underfunded and underdeveloped. Most workplace programming interventions were poorly designed, coordinated and managed. The study attributed this gloomy to factors including non-integration of WHA Is as a business case, apparent absence of senior management commitment, low priority given to employee welfare support in the deployment of corporate resources, adverse effects of a shrinking national economy, technical capacity deficiencies, downplaying the essence of leveraging synergies, flagrant disregard of programme implementation guidelines, benchmark standards and conventional management success factors