The Concept of Nature in the Thought of John Philoponus " We must now ask how this dynamic and relational way of thinking in his science, strictly in accordance with the nature or reality of things, affected Philoponos' theology in giving...
moreThe Concept of Nature in the Thought of John Philoponus " We must now ask how this dynamic and relational way of thinking in his science, strictly in accordance with the nature or reality of things, affected Philoponos' theology in giving it a dynamic form in the doctrine of God and of salvation. "-Thomas F. Torrance in Theological and Natural Science, p. 6 This essay attempts to clarify the way the great 6 th Century Alexandrian Grammarian, John Philoponus, thought to employ a new concept of nature both in his philosophical or scientific and in his theological works. It is argued that, for Philoponus, there exists a real cognitive interface between the science of his theology and the theology of his philosophy, his physics, and his cosmology. It is further argued that, standing on the holy ground of this interface, we also may seek to understand the contingent order of the Universe as God's Creation as it comes to us from the Incarnate Word or Logos of the Almighty, the Father of the Lord Jesus Christ. I offer it in honor of the Very Reverend Professor Thomas F. Torrance. Part A The concept associated with the term 'Israel' means different things to different people. It signifies to different people of various epochs in the history of the world a spectrum of understandings. At Fuller Theological Seminary, the Bible scholar William Sanford LaSor, in his book entitled Israel, explored the meaning of this term across the centuries of Biblical history, concluding with some sense of mystery about the significance of the term in various times at various places in the history of the world. As a concept, the term possessed both differentiated signification as well as an integrative reference across the diverse contexts in which it is employed. A range of meanings was indicated when the whole concept was studied. The Bible reader knows well the reality that one term can refer in time and space to very different particulars, while connecting them all up as a whole. 1 In a similar way, the concept of Nature has meant different things to different people in various times and different contexts. Our efforts to understand the nature of the Universe, for instance, have required many adjustments, so to speak. The great Quantum physicist, Paul Dirac, could employ the term in his science with the assumption of the real solidity of its significance for his physics, even while knowing that the nature of fundamental particles has changed in our time dramatically. 2 Only a few years after Dirac, the Cambridge physicist, Roger Penrose, in his magisterial work entitled The Road to Reality, could write about the problem in understanding the nature of the wholeness and the particulars of this Universe: " True-so they might argue-we have been fortunate enough to stumble upon mathematical schemes that accord with Nature in remarkable ways, but the unity of Nature as a whole with some mathematical scheme can