One of the puzzles which perhaps future historians of economic thought will be able to explain is why the socio-economic critics of economic theory believe that they may overcome the deficits of liberal economic thinking if they interpret... more
One of the puzzles which perhaps future historians of economic thought will be able to explain is why the socio-economic critics of economic theory believe that they may overcome the deficits of liberal economic thinking if they interpret the economic man (homo oeconomicus) as a undersocialised category and confront it with the oversocialised view of man in sociology (homo sociologicus).
