The International Politics of Tourism

Bu bölümde, uluslararası turizm çalışmalarına, faaliyetin dinlenme ve eğlenme amaçlı boş zaman faaliyeti olarak uluslararası kısa süreli yer değişimi ve bunun mevcut ve muhtemel ekonomik etkilerinin ötesine geçmek anlamında kapsamlı, faaliyet kaynaklı sorunlara işaret etmek anlamında da eleştirel bakış açısı getirme iddiasındaki uluslararası politik ekonomi disiplini şemsiyesi altındaki önermeler incelenmiştir. Bu anlamda, ülkeler arasındaki uluslararası eşitsiz ilişkilerin uluslararası turizme etkilerinden söz edilmiş, uluslararası turizm faaliyetinde istihdam rejiminin genel niteliği tartışılmış ve ilişkili olarak da toplumsal cinsiyet kaynaklı sorunlara işaret edilmiştir. Faaliyetin çevre ile ilişkisi bağlamında, ekolojik toplumsal muhalefetin yanı sıra, yeni bir toplumsal hareket olarak ortaya çıkan anti-turizm hareketinin temel saikleri tartışılmıştır. Böylece, uluslararası turizmin politik ekonomisinin çerçevesi çizilmiş, araştırma gündem ve ajandası soruşturulmuştur.

This work addresses a critical analysis of the nature of cosmopolitan order encouraged by the World Tourism Organization. Given the growth of tourism activity and the challenges that it poses, this specialized agency of the United Nations has formally promoted equitable, responsible and sustainable development of tourism. However, the criticism of the principles from which the organization shapes tourism has put the focus on the objectives pursued. The conversion of these principles, included in the Global Code of Ethics for Tourism, adopted in 1999, into an international convention, approved in September 2017, presents a new scene that this work outlines from the cosmopolitanism perspective.

European Association of Archaeologists. Annual Meeting.
Barcelona 2018, 5th of September-8th of September.
Session: 776
Title:
Heritage management in the 21st Century: where is it heading? State Agencies, NGOs, Charities or independent organisations?
Keywords:
heritage management, conservation, visitor's experience

What are the challenges of heritage management in the XXI century? What are the good tools we should pick up and which one we should drop when it comes to heritage management?
How do we assess whether state-managed or private-managed heritage sites and museums are successful? What are the criteria? Is there a way to predict where we are heading when it comes to preserve our heritage not for our generation, but for those to come?
These are the questions I would like to discuss and hopefully find an answer to by case-studies and experiences of those working in the heritage sector across the country and abroad.

ABSTRACT:
Cultural sites and museums have been run primarily on public funding, yet some countries – although just a handful – have taken an alternative approach by establishing national independent organisations. They are set up as charities to receive special benefits and they strive to fund-raise enough to enable day-to-day operations as well as long-term conservation.
All these various agencies focus on operation management, service industry settings and branding heritage in order to generate revenues for conservation and enhance the quality of the visitor experience. What are the results achieved so far? Are current models suitable or are there alternative paths to be explored?
The purpose of this session is to gather experts of various backgrounds to share their on-going research on site and museum management, frameworks already in use by managers and directors of these institutions to enable relevant conservation and visitor's experience. Papers should explore issues encountered during the project development, creation and delivery of successful management plans – that deliver both vital conservation and exceptional visitor's experience – and the impact of institutions such as Heritage Lottery Fund. The session also aims at exploring the differences between heritage sites run by state agencies, NGOs, charities and independent organisations in the following areas: policies, decision-making, development of management plans, fund-raising to enable conservation and visitor's experience planning, define balance between conservation and visitor's experience delivery. Papers exploring financial issues and how to successfully address them are welcome.
Organisers
Main organiser:
Edoardo Bedin (United Kingdom) 1
Co-organisers:
Ms. Anna Miaczewska (Poland) 2
Affiliations:
1. Arheološki muzej u Zagrebu- Zagreb, Croatia
2. Uniwersytet Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej- Lublin, Poland
Theme:
Museums and the challenges of archaeological outreach in the 21st century
Session format:
Session, made up of a combination of papers, max. 15 minutes each