Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

From $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

Supreme Court Petition No 10-1275
Supreme Court Petition No 10-1275
Supreme Court Petition No 10-1275
Ebook32 pages23 minutes

Supreme Court Petition No 10-1275

Rating: 0 out of 5 stars

()

Read preview

About this ebook

The petitioner asked the Supreme Court two important questions:
1. On his petition to the California Supreme Court: is the petitioner entitled to a written and published opinion under his 1st Amendment right to petition, 5th Amendment right for due process and 14th Amendment right for equal treatment?
2. On his motion to void the trial court's judgment for lack of fundamental jurisdiction, did the California Appeal Court have discretion to avoid and not hear and decide the motion without a written and published opinion?

LanguageEnglish
Release dateJul 30, 2013
ISBN9781301888092
Supreme Court Petition No 10-1275
Author

James Constant

writes on law, government, mathematics and science, as they are and as they should be

Read more from James Constant

Related to Supreme Court Petition No 10-1275

Titles in the series (3)

View More

Related ebooks

Constitutional Law For You

View More

Related articles

Reviews for Supreme Court Petition No 10-1275

Rating: 0 out of 5 stars
0 ratings

0 ratings0 reviews

What did you think?

Tap to rate

Review must be at least 10 words

    Book preview

    Supreme Court Petition No 10-1275 - James Constant

    Supreme Court Petition No 10-1275

    Skipping Constitutional Mandates

    By James Constant

    Smashwords Edition

    Copyright © 2012 by James Constant

    Smashwords Edition, License Notes

    This ebook is licensed for your personal enjoyment only. This ebook may not be re-sold or given away to other people. If you would like to share this book with another person, please purchase an additional copy for each recipient. If you’re reading this book and did not purchase it, or it was not purchased for your use only, then please return to Smashwords.com and purchase your own copy. Thank you for respecting the hard work of this author.

    No. 10-1275

    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

    JAMES CONSTANT, Petitioner,

    v.

    THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA,

    acting by and through the Department of Transportation,

    Real Party in Interest, Respondent.

    On Petition For Writ of Certiorari To the Court of Appeal Of

    California 4th Appellate District

    PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI AND MOTION TO VOID JUDGMENT

    James Constant, pro per

    April 15, 2011

    i

    QUESTIONS PRESENTED

    1. On his petition to the California Supreme Court: is the petitioner entitled to a written and published opinion under his 1st Amendment right to petition, 5th Amendment right for due process and 14th Amendment right for equal treatment?

    2. On his motion to void the trial court's judgment for lack of fundamental jurisdiction, did the California Appeal Court have discretion to avoid and not hear and decide the motion without a written and published opinion?

    ii

    LIST OF PARTIES

    All parties appear in the caption of the case on the cover page.

    iii

    TABLE OF CONTENTS

    OPINIONS BELOW

    JURISDICTION

    STATUTORY PROVISIONS INVOLVED

    STATEMENT OF THE CASE

    Motion to Void Judgment For Lack of Fundamental Jurisdiction

    Petition Legal

    Enjoying the preview?
    Page 1 of 1