Ghosts
By Henrik Ibsen
3.5/5
()
About this ebook
Henrik Ibsen
Henrik Ibsen (1828–1906) is the Norwegian playwright deemed the “father of realism.” Born in Skien, Norway, Ibsen was exiled in 1862 to Italy, where he wrote the tragedy Brand. After moving to Germany in 1868, he wrote A Doll’s House (1879), one of his most famous works; Hedda Gabler (1890), the title character of which is one of theater’s most notorious roles; and many other plays. In 1891, Ibsen returned to Norway, where he remained until his death.
Read more from Henrik Ibsen
An Enemy of the People Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5An Enemy of the People (1882) Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Doll’s House: A Play in Three Acts Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Ghosts Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Nora : A Doll's House (NHB Modern Plays) Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAn Enemy of the People (NHB Modern Plays) Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Wild Duck Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Rosmersholm Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Master Builder Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5An Enemy of the People Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHedda Gabler (NHB Modern Plays) Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWhen We Dead Awaken Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5An Enemy of the People: With linked Table of Contents Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Ghosts Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Hedda Gabbler Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPeer Gynt Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSix Plays by Henrik Ibsen (Barnes & Noble Classics Series) Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Doll's House Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe League of Youth Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Hedda Tesman (NHB Modern Plays) Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Doll's House and Other Plays Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Ghosts (1881) Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Master Builder Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5
Related to Ghosts
Related ebooks
Miss. Julie Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Four Plays Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWhen We Dead Awaken Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Hedda Gabler by Henrik Ibsen - Delphi Classics (Illustrated) Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Misanthrope Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Master Builder Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Three Sisters by Anton Chekhov (Illustrated) Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Plays, written by Sir John Vanbrugh, volume the first Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Doll's House and Other Plays Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Anna Christie Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Straw Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsUncle Vanya Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Seagull Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Three Sisters Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTartuffe Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Lady from the Sea Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Richard III Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Life is a Dream Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Cherry Orchard Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5August Strindberg: Five Major Plays Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Three Sisters Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Changeling Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Wild Duck Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Plays of Anton Chekhov Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Salome Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Hedda Gabler Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5King Lear Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Measure for Measure Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Woman of No Importance Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Electra Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5
Thrillers For You
Animal Farm Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Leave the World Behind: A Novel Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Pretty Girls: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Fairy Tale Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The 7 1/2 Deaths of Evelyn Hardcastle Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Hidden Pictures: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5We Have Always Lived in the Castle Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Maidens: A Novel Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Dark Tower I: The Gunslinger Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Institute: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Housemaid Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Mr. Penumbra's 24-Hour Bookstore: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Girl Who Was Taken: A Gripping Psychological Thriller Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Rock Paper Scissors: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Long Walk Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Only Good Indians Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Sympathizer: A Novel (Pulitzer Prize for Fiction) Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Needful Things Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Eyes of the Dragon Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Last Flight: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Flicker in the Dark: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5I'm Thinking of Ending Things: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Family Upstairs: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Everyone in My Family Has Killed Someone: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Troop Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Paris Apartment: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Thirteen: The Serial Killer Isn't on Trial. He's on the Jury. Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Different Seasons Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Cryptonomicon Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Finn Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Related categories
Reviews for Ghosts
172 ratings6 reviews
- Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5a play about Mrs. Alving a widow,who was accused by Pastor Manders,of failing in providing enough moral guidance to her son Oswald....
MANDERS. Just as you once disowned a wife's duty, so you have since
disowned a mother's.
MRS. ALVING. Ah--!
MANDERS. You have been all your life under the dominion of a
pestilent spirit of self-will. The whole bias of your mind has been
towards insubordination and lawlessness. You have never known how to
endure any bond. Everything that has weighed upon you in life you
have cast away without care or conscience, like a burden you were
free to throw off at will. It did not please you to be a wife any
longer, and you left your husband. You found it troublesome to be a
mother, and you sent your child forth among strangers.
MRS. ALVING. Yes, that is true. I did so.
MANDERS. And thus you have become a stranger to him.
MRS. ALVING. No! no! I am not.
after this conversation,Mrs. Alving was forced to tell the truth that she had kept hidden.that Captain Alving was an awful man who was unfaithful throughout his life....
there are many symbols in this play....
the ghosts which are MRS. ALVING thoughts....lies about the past and her fear to say the truth,that should be told....
Oswald last wish before dying is to see the sun light ,he kept crying out for the sun. which symbolize for the joy of life which he always seeks....
The fire that destroys the orphanage which she was naming after her husband name....that destroyed the whole building,and eliminated all the deception.....
MANDERS. And it is to this man that you raise a memorial?
MRS. ALVING. There you see the power of an evil conscience.
MANDERS. Evil--? What do you mean?
MRS. ALVING. It always seemed to me impossible but that the truth
must come out and be believed. So the Orphanage was to deaden all
rumours and set every doubt at rest. - Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Excellently written, dark, controversial at time and now drama about all kinds of unpleasantries that affect peoples lives from 'dissipated lives' to euthanasia and using morphine to commit suicide cos of VD. I will explore Ibsens Ouvre.
- Rating: 2 out of 5 stars2/5Dilemma’s: -erfelijkheid (Oswald)-hypocrisie en burgerlijke moraal:Manders-vrouwenplicht: mrs Alving-respect voor ouders: Regina (weer erg engelachtig)-euthanasie: Oswaldniet helemaal geslaagd!
- Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5A powerful, controversial play (like most of his), he conveys a less than sterling relationship between mother and son that disintegrates when the truth comes out and the son's mind deteriorates. The truth will always out.
- Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Ibsen's plays really take you to the end of 19th century - and make youfeel the anxiety caused by social pressures and hypocrisy and seek the power to break free from the rules and conventions and reach for something real.
- Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Hey, Whoopi Goldberg isn't in this...I found the play interesting, but Oswald's hysterics were melodramatic and bordered on comical. For a better play about a dysfunctional family, read Tennessee Williams.
Book preview
Ghosts - Henrik Ibsen
THIRD.
INTRODUCTION.
The winter of 1879-80 Ibsen spent in Munich, and the greater part of the summer of 1880 at Berchtesgaden. November 1880 saw him back in Rome, and he passed the summer of 1881 at Sorrento. There, fourteen years earlier, he had written the last acts of Peer Gynt ; there he now wrote, or at any rate completed, Gengangere . It was published in December 1881, after he had returned to Rome. On December 22 he wrote to Ludwig Passarge, one of his German translators, My new play has now appeared, and has occasioned a terrible uproar in the Scandinavian press; every day I receive letters and newspaper articles decrying or praising it.... I consider it utterly impossible that any German theatre will accept the play at present. I hardly believe that they will dare to play it in the Scandinavian countries for some time to come.
How rightly he judged we shall see anon.
In the newspapers there was far more obloquy than praise. Two men, however, stood by him from the first: Björnson, from whom he had been practically estranged ever since The League of Youth , and Georg Brandes. The latter published an article in which he declared (I quote from memory) that the play might or might not be Ibsen's greatest work, but that it was certainly his noblest deed. It was, doubtless, in acknowledgment of this article that Ibsen wrote to Brandes on January 3, 1882: "Yesterday I had the great pleasure of receiving your brilliantly clear and so warmly appreciative review of Ghosts .... All who read your article must, it seems to me, have their eyes opened to what I meant by my new book—assuming, that is, that they have any wish to see. For I cannot get rid of the impression that a very large number of the false interpretations which have appeared in the newspapers are the work of people who know better. In Norway, however, I am willing to believe that the stultification has in most cases been unintentional; and the reason is not far to seek. In that country a great many of the critics are theologians, more or less disguised; and these gentlemen are, as a rule, quite unable to write rationally about creative literature. That enfeeblement of judgment which, at least in the case of the average man, is an inevitable consequence of prolonged occupation with theological studies, betrays itself more especially in the judging of human character, human actions, and human motives. Practical business judgment, on the other hand, does not suffer so much from studies of this order. Therefore the reverend gentlemen are very often excellent members of local boards; but they are unquestionably our worst critics. This passage is interesting as showing clearly the point of view from which Ibsen conceived the character of Manders. In the next paragraph of the same letter he discusses the attitude of
the so-called Liberal press"; but as the paragraph contains the germ of An Enemy of the People , it may most fittingly be quoted in the introduction to that play.
Three days later (January 6) Ibsen wrote to Schandorph, the Danish novelist: I was quite prepared for the hubbub. If certain of our Scandinavian reviewers have no talent for anything else, they have an unquestionable talent for thoroughly misunderstanding and misinterpreting those authors whose books they undertake to judge.... They endeavour to make me responsible for the opinions which certain of the personages of my drama express. And yet there is not in the whole book a single opinion, a single utterance, which can be laid to the account of the author. I took good care to avoid this. The very method, the order of technique which imposes its form upon the play, forbids the author to appear in the speeches of his characters. My object was to make the reader feel that he was going through a piece of real experience; and nothing could more effectually prevent such an impression than the intrusion of the author's private opinions into the dialogue. Do they imagine at home that I am so inexpert in the theory of drama as not to know this? Of course I know it, and act accordingly. In no other play that I have written is the author so external to the action, so entirely absent from it, as in this last one.
They say,
he continued, that the book preaches Nihilism. Not at all. It is not concerned to preach anything whatsoever. It merely points to the ferment of Nihilism going on under the surface, at home as elsewhere. A Pastor Manders will always goad one or other Mrs. Alving to revolt. And just because she is a woman, she will, when once she has begun, go to the utmost extremes.
Towards the end of January Ibsen wrote from Rome to Olaf Skavlan: "These last weeks have brought me a wealth of experiences, lessons, and discoveries. I, of course, foresaw that my new play would call forth a howl from the camp of the stagnationists; and for; this I care no more than for the barking of a pack of chained dogs. But the pusillanimity which I have observed among the so-called Liberals has given me cause for reflection. The very day after my play was published the Dagblad rushed out a hurriedly-written article, evidently designed to purge itself of all suspicion of complicity in my work. This was entirely unnecessary. I myself am responsible for what I write, I and no one else. I cannot possibly embarrass any party, for to no party do I belong. I stand like a solitary franc-tireur at the outposts, and fight for my own hand. The only man in Norway who has stood up freely, frankly, and courageously for me is Björnson. It is just like him. He has in truth a great, kingly soul, and I shall never forget his action in this matter."
One more quotation completes the history of these stirring January days, as written by Ibsen himself. It occurs in a letter to a Danish journalist, Otto Borchsenius. It may well be,
the poet writes, that the play is in several respects rather daring. But it seemed to me that the time had come for moving some boundary-posts. And this was an undertaking for which a man of the older generation, like myself, was better fitted than the many younger authors who might desire to do something of the kind. I was prepared for a storm; but such storms one must not shrink from encountering. That would be cowardice.
It happened that, just in these days, the present writer had frequent opportunities of conversing with Ibsen, and of hearing from his own lips almost all the views expressed in the above extracts. He was especially emphatic, I remember, in protesting against the notion that the opinions expressed by Mrs. Alving or Oswald were to be attributed to himself. He insisted, on the contrary, that Mrs. Alving's views were merely typical of the moral chaos inevitably produced by re-action from the narrow conventionalism represented by Manders.
With one consent, the leading theatres of the three Scandinavian capitals declined to have anything to do with the play. It was more than eighteen months old before it