Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

From $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

DH 2 vs Albatros D I/D II: Western Front 1916
DH 2 vs Albatros D I/D II: Western Front 1916
DH 2 vs Albatros D I/D II: Western Front 1916
Ebook156 pages1 hour

DH 2 vs Albatros D I/D II: Western Front 1916

Rating: 3.5 out of 5 stars

3.5/5

()

Read preview

About this ebook

An illustrated account of the DH 2, the most successful 'pusher' fighter of World War I, against the Albatros D II, part of a long family of fighters that in many ways symbolized German aerial might in the conflict.

Flown by Victoria Cross recipient Lanoe Hawker and the members of No 24 Sqn, the ungainly yet nimble DH 2 helped the Allies attain air superiority over the Somme in early 1916 and hold it through the summer. With its rotary engine 'pusher' configuration affording excellent visibility and eliminating the need for a synchronized machine gun, the DH 2 was more than a match for anything the Germans could put in the air. That is, until the arrival of the Albatros D II, a sleek inline-engined machine built for speed and with twin-gun firepower.

This book dissects the epic struggle in the skies above the Somme in 1916, pitting the manoeuvrable yet under-gunned DH 2s against the less nimble yet better armed and faster Albatros D IIs. In the end the Germans would regain air superiority, three squadron commanders – two of whom were considered pinnacles of their respective air forces – would lose their lives, and an up-and-coming pilot (Manfred von Richthofen) would triumph in a legendary dogfight and attain unimagined heights fighting with tactics learned from a fallen mentor.
LanguageEnglish
Release dateMay 20, 2012
ISBN9781780964201
DH 2 vs Albatros D I/D II: Western Front 1916
Author

James F. Miller

James F. Miller is a married father of two who lives in Naples, Florida. A commercial pilot and lifelong student of all aspects of aviation, his current research focuses on the middle years of World War I.

Read more from James F. Miller

Related to DH 2 vs Albatros D I/D II

Titles in the series (36)

View More

Related ebooks

Wars & Military For You

View More

Related articles

Reviews for DH 2 vs Albatros D I/D II

Rating: 3.5 out of 5 stars
3.5/5

1 rating0 reviews

What did you think?

Tap to rate

Review must be at least 10 words

    Book preview

    DH 2 vs Albatros D I/D II - James F. Miller

    Reading

    INTRODUCTION

    While modern air forces employ time-tested, combat-proven tactics and decades-old aeroplanes designed on well understood aeronautical principles and built with ample time for testing and refining, air forces of World War I were literally writing the book on tactics and aeroplane design as dictated by the current state of the war. Indeed, throughout the conflict a perpetual reactionary arms race existed to counter and hopefully conquer the enemy’s latest aeroplane technology. Nowhere was this more evident than with single-seat scouts.

    Better known today as ‘fighter aeroplanes’, single-seat scouts were born as a direct result of two-seater aerial reconnaissance and artillery observation. Such infantry cooperation aeroplanes were crucial for the furtherance of army strategic and tactical planning for ground force success. This was particularly the case on the static Western Front, where trench-based warfare throttled any cavalry-based reconnaissance. Without exaggeration, two-seater photographic reconnaissance was as important in World War I as satellites are today.

    Naturally, it became desirable for all combatants not only to amass as much intelligence as possible via two-seater excursions over the frontlines but to simultaneously prevent the enemy from achieving the same. This begat two-seater crews arming themselves for aerial interception of their belligerent counterparts, but soon single-seat ‘scouts’ were developed to use speed to dash quickly over the lines, conduct a specific observation, and then quickly regain the lines. However, both sides realised that single-seat scouts provided an effective means with which to hunt and shoot down enemy reconnaissance aeroplanes, as well as to protect their own reconnaissance types from similar treatment. A natural result of these tactical implementations was scout-versus-scout combat – the ‘fighter aeroplane’ and ‘dogfighting’ were born.

    No. 24 Sqn DH 2s 6000 (left) and 5925 (right) at Bertangles in July 1916 – note 5925’s slightly lower nacelle front. This aircraft was one of three DH 2s involved in an epic clash with Jasta 2 that saw the loss of No. 24 Sqn CO Maj Lanoe Hawker.

    However, the superiority pendulum swung without equality as each side strove to counter what the enemy already possessed. The Germans struck first with their Fokker Eindeckers, armed with a single Maxim machine gun that was synchronised to fire through the propeller arc. Not necessarily an extremely nimble aeroplane – it did not have to be when pursuing sluggish two-seater reconnaissance types such as the Royal Aircraft Factory (RAF) BE 2c – the monoplane’s armament and speed (approximately 88mph compared to the BE 2c’s modest 69mph at 10,000ft) allowed it to plunder Allied reconnaissance machines. This in turn gave rise to the legendary ‘Fokker Scourge’ description given to German air superiority over the Western Front from late 1915 through to early 1916.

    As yet the Triple Entente (Great Britain, France and Russia) had no reliable synchronisation gear with which to counter the new threat. However, the single-seat French Nieuport 11 ‘Bebe’ soon appeared with a single Lewis machine gun mounted atop the upper wing that fired over the propeller arc, bypassing the need for propeller synchronisation.

    The British answer to the problem was to employ the ‘pusher’ aeroplane concept – i.e. locate the engine behind the cockpit to allow the pilot freedom to fire a machine gun forward without any interference from the propeller. This arrangement had previously been used in two-seaters such as the Farman F 40 and RAF FE 2b, but the Aircraft Manufacturing Company’s DH 2 was the first single-seat pusher designed specifically for air-to-air interdiction.

    Now equipped with fighters that were as fast and more nimble than the German monoplanes and, crucially, available in greater numbers, the Entente had once again achieved control of the skies over the Western Front by the summer of 1916. A postwar German analysis concluded:

    With a dose of right rudder, Jasta 2’s Ltn Otto Höhne guns Albatros D I 390/16 on its takeoff run in the autumn of 1916. Höhne had shot down six aeroplanes with Jasta 2 by the time he was wounded in January 1917. A year later he would return to the unit as Staffelführer.

    The start of the Somme battle [1 July 1916] unfortunately coincided with the low point in the technical development of our aircraft. The unquestioned air supremacy we had enjoyed in early 1916 by virtue of our Fokker monoplane fighters had shifted over to the enemy’s Nieuport, Vickers [generic German term for British lattice-tailed pushers, in this instance referring to the DH 2] and Sopwith aircraft in March and April.

    As the German monoplanes were replaced by biplane fighters such as the Fokker D I and various Halberstadt machines, pilots wanted a fighter that had power enough to promote speed and bear the weight of twin-gun firepower. Enter the Albatros D I and D II, each boasting a 160hp engine that gave the pilots what they had asked for. The Albatros Ds were not as manoeuvrable as the Nieuport 11 or DH 2, but this was not a detriment when one considers that shooting down ungainly two-seaters was a primary endeavour. All pilots sought to attack under a cloak of surprise, using speed to swiftly approach one’s target unseen and then hammer it down before the crew of the aeroplane was even aware that they were under attack.

    Head to head, the DH 2 was more manoeuvrable than the Albatros D I and D II, but the latter were faster, had better rates of climb and were equipped with two beltfed machine guns and 1,000 rounds of ammunition. The DH 2 had a single gun with less than half that amount of ammunition, carried in 47- or 97-round drums that had to be replaced during combat. The Albatros also enjoyed a much more reliable inline engine than the DH 2’s rotary motor, which was prone to power loss or outright failure due to mechanical faults. However, even with properly running engines, speed triumphs manoeuvrability. The latter is a defensive tactic and fighter aeroplanes are offensive weapons, best employing surprise in order to prevail over an opponent. The DH 2’s nimble attributes, therefore, could not easily overcome the Albatros’s superior speed (the DH 2 was nearly 20mph slower in level flight), especially when in a dive, and firepower.

    Royal Flying Corps (RFC) pilot Capt R. H. M. S. Saundby’s recollections succinctly set the stage for the chapters that follow:

    The Albatros single-seater fighting machine was the first formidable tractor [engine in front] biplane scout produced by the enemy. While we had occasionally met them before, they only became numerous and, therefore, offensive at the beginning of November [1916]. The de Havilland Scout had a hard job when outnumbered by these machines, and only carried on because of its handiness and manoeuvring power, for its speed and climb were much inferior to these new Huns [slang for Germans and/or German aeroplanes].

    This outstanding close-up photograph of American volunteer pilot Lt Geoffrey H. Bonnell of No. 32 Sqn clearly reveals the DH 2’s nacelle and single 0.303in Lewis machine gun. Bonnell would later join the US Army Air Service and command the 147th Aero Squadron. (Aaron Weaver)

    CHRONOLOGY

    No. 32 Sqn DH 2 7907 features clear doped fabric sides, grey

    Enjoying the preview?
    Page 1 of 1