Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Kat's Reviews > The Ministry of Time

The Ministry of Time by Kaliane Bradley
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
63448764
it’s only March, but I can confidently say literally no matter what else I’ll be reading this year, this book will firmly sit at the #1 spot of “what the f did I just read” by the end of 2024. 🫡

Simply put, The Ministry of Time (which has NOTHING to do with the Spanish series of the same name and sure as hell didn't plagiarise anything) is a novel set in not so distant future Britain about a compliant civil servant who out of the blue is told that her country has acquired the means to travel through time and who finds herself promptly recruited as a time travel agent who, alongside others, is tasked to live with, assist, and monitor a group of ‘expats’ stolen from across time, shepherding them into the 21st century, all in order to test the limits of time travel.

But I also need want to tell you that one of goodreads’ top liked reviews on this book calling it “the closest thing to OUTLANDER since [they] have read since OUTLANDER” doesn’t even come close to describing what this novel also is:

a self-insert, first person POV fanfiction, not about a fictional character, but about a man who really existed, who even has his own Wikipedia page (read that again), leading to a narrative set-up so incredulous and bizarre, if the author had told me she and her friends came up with this idea during a pub crawl that, after consuming several alcohol containing beverages, led to a wild round of the Wiki Game until one of them stumbled upon Graham Gore’s entry only to read that he was an English naval officer who supposedly died during an Arctic expedition in the 1850s, I would have believed her, no questions asked. 🤠

before you continue reading I need you to be very real about this and take a look at the man in question:
description
I can't and won't elaborate. 🙂‍↔️🙂‍↔️

But maybe I just need to chill out because doesn’t every idea for a story start with a bit of self-indulgent self-insert? Dante did it, Stephanie Meyer did it, surely Kaliane Bradley can do it, too. The latter, however, included a real person turning him into her version of a fictional character. This, too, has been done before (recent examples include The Christie Affair as well as Hamnet), and I’m not looking to jump into an ethics discussion I am wholly unequipped for, but it was bizarre reading about the main character being gone down on (can I even say this??) by a navy officer (who in real life was definitely a racist and misogynistic Imperialist) in first-person narrative. And the sex was actually well-written in a way that was super realistic for a man and a woman born two centuries apart having sex for the first time. 🫣
He bit me sharply on the shoulder and some other animal noise escaped me. He started to dig his thumbs into tender places while he moved in me. I bucked insistently into the pressure. A certain thrilling pain, which lived in my body like another body, woke and opened its long series of tributaries through my ribs.


Another reason why this is not only far from Outlander, but also far from what fans of Outlander might hope to find in here, is that yes, there is a romance story but this novel isn’t ABOUT romance, something that clearly shows in the writing style and the story’s focal point (more on that later). Bradley’s writing is expressive, creative, smashing nouns and adjectives together into similes and metaphors that should make no sense but weirdly do.

We entered the season of rains. A great graphite pencil inscribed the diagonal journey of water on the air.

March came in, mellow and pastel. The air felt washed. The scrubbed newness of the spring gave the rooftops and the street furniture a friendly polish.


The novel is part sci-fi, speculative fiction, action adventure, spy thriller, and romantic comedy and the writing reflects all of these genres more successfully than not, mostly because it changes style more often than not. Sweeping metaphors follow internal monologues, stand-up style commentary is superseded by onomatopoetic neologisms used to convey coughing, sneezing, throwing up, and sounds of pleasure. It’s hard for me to describe but there is something raw and yet precisely wielded about her words that makes me wonder what her literary voice sounds like when it focuses on just one of the themes touched upon in this novel instead of a myriad of them in which it is drowned out by all the things squeezed into it.

It is shared very early on that the British-Cambodian main character has been subjected to racial microaggressions all her life, something she picks up, talks about, and dissects throughout the course of the novel, reflecting her life as a biracial woman working for the government of a former colonial empire in a sometimes bitter, sometimes satirical, sometimes seemingly blassé voice. Those moments of critique that tear down past and current day Britain with its violent racist history as well as its linguistic gymnastics whenever Blackness or racial diversity comes up are the sharpest, the most poignant - Bradley’s language becoming a razor-sharp spear tip piercing the bullsh!t masquerading as equal opportunities for everyone.

Many other topics including manmade climate change, refugees, immigration, violence against women, homophobia, otherness, parent-child relationships, complicity, crimes against humanity etc are also mentioned, but none the above are explored as deeply as I would have liked. Maybe it’s because the novel tried to be or do too many things at once but there wasn’t enough of the stuff I DID enjoy for me to fall in love with this.

Since the BBC snapped up the adaptation rights to this even before the novel has come out, we will not have seen the last of Officer Graham Gore (and this will not even be the first time he is portrayed on screen since he already appeared in AMCs The Terror). Given that A24 is set to produce this six-episode series I admit I’m a little excited for how this aggressively weird, headstrong, unique, absurd novel ends up looking as a serialised adaptation.

Last but not least, write that self-insert fanfiction, speak your truth! ✨👸🏽

🎬 After reading this you should watch that: Kate and Leopold (2001), Lost in Austen (2008), About Time (2013)

As always, thanks to NetGalley, the publisher and the author for granting me an ARC in exchange for an honest review.
298 likes · flag

Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read The Ministry of Time.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

February 27, 2024 – Started Reading
February 27, 2024 – Shelved
February 28, 2024 –
47.0% "this is weird but I think I’m enjoying it?"
February 28, 2024 –
47.0% "“He tugged me suddenly towards him and my heart jumped into my throat. I made a noise. In fact, I said, ‘woof’.” — oh girl you’re down so bad it’s embarrassing 😭"
February 28, 2024 –
47.0% "“The city looked like it was painted by a lesser Impressionist.” — that’s such a killer insulting description 😭🤌🏻"
February 28, 2024 –
50.0% "„The psychoanalyst Graham worked with was a Freudian. I found this charming and always made an effort to dress up nicely for debriefings with him, as I imagined that he had all sorts of crackpot ideas about women and I was hoping he'd diagnose me as a sexual sadist or something chic like that.“"
March 3, 2024 – Shelved as: no-bullshit-romance
March 3, 2024 – Shelved as: netgalley
March 3, 2024 – Shelved as: ebook
March 3, 2024 – Shelved as: e-arc
March 3, 2024 – Shelved as: dont-know-how-i-feel-about-you
March 3, 2024 – Shelved as: debut-novel
March 3, 2024 – Shelved as: books-on-screen
March 3, 2024 – Shelved as: 2024-reads
March 3, 2024 – Finished Reading
April 30, 2024 – Shelved as: girlfailure-lit

Comments Showing 1-32 of 32 (32 new)

dateDown arrow    newest »

message 1: by Kartik (new) - added it

Kartik I had never heard of this until I saw your review, I think I’ll try it out since it at least sounds ambitious :)


message 2: by Kat (new) - rated it 3 stars

Kat Kartik wrote: "I had never heard of this until I saw your review, I think I’ll try it out since it at least sounds ambitious :)"

if it’s anything, it’s ambitious. I’d rather see someone try to be creative and inventive and fail at that than see someone who plays it safe with the same old formula


message 3: by liv ❁ (new) - added it

liv ❁ well this sure does sound like an interesting experience of a novel


message 4: by Kat (new) - rated it 3 stars

Kat Liv ❁ wrote: "well this sure does sound like an interesting experience of a novel"

It's audacious and I commend it for it. Would end up recommending this even though I "only" rated it three stars. Very curious to know what you'd make of it!


message 5: by liv ❁ (new) - added it

liv ❁ Kat wrote: "Liv ❁ wrote: "well this sure does sound like an interesting experience of a novel"

It's audacious and I commend it for it. Would end up recommending this even though I "only" rated it three stars...."


I may check it out! It does sound very intriguing


Chelka Posladek This is exactly how I felt about this book. Thanks for the review!


Katerina I was also thinking of Kate & Leopold (2001) and the series Sleepy Hollow (2013) whilst reading The Ministry of Time.


message 8: by Kat (new) - rated it 3 stars

Kat Katerina wrote: "I was also thinking of Kate & Leopold (2001) and the series Sleepy Hollow (2013) whilst reading The Ministry of Time."

oh, Kate and Leopold is a fab rec!! I'll add it to the review!


message 9: by Melissa (new) - added it

Melissa I just finished this book and thought it was a huge mess. Your review summarized my thoughts perfectly (also, I’m laughing out loud at your comment about Gore’s photo.) Why did so many paragraphs open with awkward metaphors about the weather? Entire conversations between characters made absolutely zero sense, and I felt the majority of dialogue and actions were neither coherent nor logically motivated. I would often reread a paragraph to see if I had misunderstood something but nope, it just made zero sense. The entire book was painfully awkward.


message 10: by Kat (new) - rated it 3 stars

Kat Chelka wrote: "This is exactly how I felt about this book. Thanks for the review!"

Of course! It was a bit of weird one, right?


message 11: by Kat (new) - rated it 3 stars

Kat Melissa wrote: "I just finished this book and thought it was a huge mess. Your review summarized my thoughts perfectly (also, I’m laughing out loud at your comment about Gore’s photo.) Why did so many paragraphs o..."

it was certainly... something. I didn't really hate it but I think it was too experimental for me to properly work. Would be curious about the author's next project, though


message 12: by Charles (new) - added it

Charles I had this shelved as want to read, but now I’m just not so sure….it sounds like it’s all over the place and I’m not really into that kind of writing ….. maybe I’ll wait to see what BBC does with it. Loved your review though .


britta ❀ You make such a great point about the characters Kat, it is a bit uncomfy. I was frustrated by the Outlander comparison too.
I mention in my review but was annoyed this was marketed as a romance, I think this could’ve been a more successful book for me if it was more focused, I thought it was a fun, creative idea. Look for ward to checking out your tv recs, thanks! 💛


message 14: by Ketutar (new)

Ketutar Jensen Actually, it does have something to do with the Spanish series... I think it would be more honest to admit one has been inspired by something, than try to vehemently argue that "it has NOTHING to do with this or that". People need to stop screaming "plagiatry" and remember that one cannot claim ideas or titles as their own personal property. Nevertheless, I wish she had named her "ministry of time" differently. It wouldn't have been that difficult, would it?


message 15: by Jan (new)

Jan Priddy Thank you, Ketutar Jensen. I kept reading how the novel is "utterly unique" and thinking: No, it's not.


message 16: by Kat (new) - rated it 3 stars

Kat Ketutar wrote: "Actually, it does have something to do with the Spanish series... I think it would be more honest to admit one has been inspired by something, than try to vehemently argue that "it has NOTHING to d..."

Have you seen the show AND read the book? You make a fair point but the only people who should be allowed to say something on the topic (of plagiarism) are those who ultimately have seen/read both in order to be able to properly compare the two


message 17: by Kat (new) - rated it 3 stars

Kat britta ❀ wrote: "You make such a great point about the characters Kat, it is a bit uncomfy. I was frustrated by the Outlander comparison too.
I mention in my review but was annoyed this was marketed as a romance, ..."


Hi Britta, exactly my thoughts! It's probably the publisher's "fault" this was marketed as a romance (and not the author's) but god yes, that marketing strategy set expectations the book itself couldn't fulfil. But the overall concept is definitely fun and engaging! And if you only have time to check out one of my film recs, make it "About Time"!


message 18: by Kat (new) - rated it 3 stars

Kat Charles wrote: "I had this shelved as want to read, but now I’m just not so sure….it sounds like it’s all over the place and I’m not really into that kind of writing ….. maybe I’ll wait to see what BBC does with i..."

I think it was The Telegraph (??) who recently published their review of this novel and they went even lower than I did, rating it 2 stars and saying "it’s horribly written, plotted and, above all, edited" oopp. definitely a mixed bag


emily based on all the bizarre tumblr references in the book I just knoowwwww she was in the terror fandom circa like four years ago. and it drives me insane because I feel like I have to have seen one of her posts at some time. this book is going to make me have an aneurysm


emily it’s self insert fanfic but it’s also ponderous autofiction about being The Child Of An Immigrant and hemming and hawing about being biracial and What Microaggressions Mean To Me and it’s a comedy and it’s about ummmm climate change and the economy and corruption and geopolitics and cooking. and what do you call it, ms. bradley? The aristocrats!


message 21: by Kat (new) - rated it 3 stars

Kat emily wrote: "based on all the bizarre tumblr references in the book I just knoowwwww she was in the terror fandom circa like four years ago. and it drives me insane because I feel like I have to have seen one o..."

That’s so specific and so niche, I love it. The Terror came up when I was researching Gore and I was left bemused about the existence of the show.


message 22: by Kat (new) - rated it 3 stars

Kat emily wrote: "it’s self insert fanfic but it’s also ponderous autofiction about being The Child Of An Immigrant and hemming and hawing about being biracial and What Microaggressions Mean To Me and it’s a comedy ..."

the self-insert fanfic vibes are truly so strong with this one


MonReads (very behind — Hurricane Milton) Based on your review, I don’t know if I can get through another wtf did I just read book this year, so I removed it from my TBR.


message 24: by Kat (new) - rated it 3 stars

Kat MonReads wrote: "Based on your review, I don’t know if I can get through another wtf did I just read book this year, so I removed it from my TBR."

ohhh, what was your first wtf read of the year?


Nancy Excellent review!!


message 26: by Cerisaye (new) - added it

Cerisaye Haha I'm nearly finished, finally, and all the way through have had a good chuckle at its overtly The Terror fanfic vibe, with a really annoying Mary Sue. From my days of reading tonnes of slash fic I know this could've been done so much better.


Abigail Ronberg I don’t think Outlander is totally about the romance though…


Cristina Drafta The “kill your queers” as well as the black woman being part of the “bad guys” team at the end we’re CHOICES imo. Oh you want to fight what climate change does to immigrants? Not over my white guy!! Still don’t know if the main character is supposed to be a cautionary tale or not.


message 29: by Anne (new) - rated it 2 stars

Anne Sullivan got far more joy out of this review than from the book. well done!


message 30: by Kat (new) - rated it 3 stars

Kat Anne wrote: "got far more joy out of this review than from the book. well done!"

haha, thank you, Anne, and you're welcome!1


message 31: by Mara (new) - rated it 2 stars

Mara Great review, I definitely finished with a WTF did I just read vibe. Certainly glad I’d never seen any references to Outlander before now, I’m turning in my future grave at the very idea! I agree the sex between characters from different eras was well written and that’s as close to Outlander as I’ll allow (herself writing sex verra well, as any fan will contest!)
Future me may be back to renege my book club suggestion or perhaps a brigadier will hunt me down for my, let’s say unusual choice!


message 32: by Dh (new) - rated it 4 stars

Dh I disagree with your use of the term "fan fiction" to describe this work. The term is not only dismissive but it's also inaccurate here. Fan fiction involves new imaginings of fictional characters or worlds, not of historical figures. The practice of writing fiction about real people from history is as old as literature itself. And even some reimaginings of fictional characters rise to the level of literature (e.g, Wide Sargasso Sea). A principal characteristic of fan fiction is that it's written by amateurs. I can understand if you don't like the book, but I think calling it fan fiction is unfair and wrong.


back to top