Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Next Article in Journal
Longitudinal Proteomic Analysis of Plasma across Healthy Pregnancies Reveals Indicators of Gestational Age
Next Article in Special Issue
Complex Diagnostics of Non-Specific Intellectual Developmental Disorder
Previous Article in Journal
Relaxin Inhibits the Cardiac Myofibroblast NLRP3 Inflammasome as Part of Its Anti-Fibrotic Actions via the Angiotensin Type 2 and ATP (P2X7) Receptors
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Microsatellite Instability in Russian Patients with Colorectal Cancer

Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(13), 7062; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23137062
by Vitaly Shubin *, Yury Shelygin, Sergey Achkasov, Oleg Sushkov, Ilya Nazarov, Alexey Ponomarenko, Iuliia Alimova, Anna Loginova and Aleksey Tsukanov *
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(13), 7062; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23137062
Submission received: 25 May 2022 / Revised: 20 June 2022 / Accepted: 23 June 2022 / Published: 25 June 2022

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Manuscript No. ijms-1765194

„Microsatellite Instability in Russian Patients with Colorectal Cancer” for International Journal of Molecular Sciences

 

Comments:

1.      At the end of the Introduction section, please include a clearly defined purpose of your work.

2.      Table 1. Please correct the table caption. Patient’s characteristics according to MSI / MSS status. OR MSI vs MSS status. OR microsatellite stability (MS) status.

3.      What was the situation of the necessity to administer neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy in the group of patients, depending on the MS status? Was there a clear correlation between the presence of metastases and the MS status and stage of disease? Was the patients' survival monitored depending on the MS status? Can the obtained results guide the choice of a therapeutic method?

4.      I am asking for the literature records unification.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

In the manuscript by Shubin et al., they analyzed the clinical data of 514 Russian patients to decide the frequency and characteristics of microsatellite instability in the Russian population. The results provided are of interest in general to clinicians and would be helpful to guide the diagnosis/categorizing/treatment of CRC patients. I have two suggestions for improving the manuscript:

1. The authors should provide the full name of "MMR" (supposedly mismatch repair) before using this acronym in the manuscript.

2. The authors should change Figures 4 and 6 to normal histograms. The way these two figures are plotted in the current manuscript is uncommon and distracting, and does not provide more information than regular histograms.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

The manuscript is corrected.

Back to TopTop