Search Results (115)

Background: Biologic therapies, such antitumour necrosis factor-alpha agents (infliximab and adalimumab), as well as newer agents (ustekinumab and vedolizumab), all have well-demonstrated safety and efficacy profiles in the management of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The choice of an optimal first-line biologic remains unclear due to a lack of comparative randomised trials and real-world studies; however, certain patient and disease characteristics may influence this choice. The aims of this study were to explore temporal trends in the choice of a first-line biologic therapy and the factors that influence this choice. Methodology: This study is a retrospective observational cohort study of all patients with IBD who commenced induction and completed at least one maintenance dose of a biologic therapy between 1 January 2015 and 31 December 2021. Relevant patient and disease-specific factors were collected, including history of malignancy and opportunistic infections at time of diagnosis, for each eligible patient. Factors affecting the choice of biologic therapy were compared using ANOVA and chi-square tests. Results: 280 patients were included in the study. Ustekinumab has overtaken infliximab and adalimumab as the first-line choice for Crohn’s disease since its introduction in 2018. Infliximab has remained the preferred first-line therapy for ulcerative colitis over adalimumab and vedolizumab. Ustekinumab has become he preferred biologic agent for older patients and those with a history of malignancy. Conclusions: Whilst an older agent such as infliximab is still preferred for the management of UC, novel agents such as ustekinumab are now more readily considered as a first-line agent for the management of CD. Full article

Purpose: Currently, there is no clinical data reported on the therapy of dual biological agents in pediatric-onset inflammatory bowel disease (PIBD) patients in China. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of dual biologic therapy or biologics combined with small molecule drugs in refractory PIBD patients in China. Methods: Clinical, laboratory, endoscopic, and ultrasound data of PIBD patients from the Department of Gastroenterology of Beijing Children’s Hospital between January 2021 and October 2024 were retrospectively analyzed. PIBD patients who received dual biologic treatment or a combination of biologic and small molecule therapy were included in this study. Steroid-free clinical remission and adverse events were recorded. Results: In this retrospective study, out of 520 children with IBD, twelve children (2.3%) were diagnosed with refractory PIBD and met the criteria for dual biotherapy, including four with UC (33%) and eight with CD (67%). The median age of patients was 13.64 (range, 1.2–17.1) years at eligibility for dual biologic therapy. There are eight (67%) patients treated with infliximab/ustekinumab (IFX + UST), three (25%) patients with upadacitinib/ustekinumab (UPA + UST), one (8%) patient with infliximab/vedolizumab (IFX + VDZ). At 3, 6, and 12 months of dual biological treatment, 91.2% (11/12), 100% (12/12), and 100% (12/12) patients showed steroid-free clinical remission, respectively. The median fecal calprotectin decreased significantly from 1852.5 µg/g (IQR, 762.5–1988.25) at baseline to 359.0 (IQR, 217.5–730.25) μg/g at 3 months, 113 (IQR, 73.7–256) μg/g at 6 months, and 82.5 (IQR, 40.25–122.25) μg/g at 12 months. Only one CD patient with IFX + UST reported mild elevation of aminotransferase, who recovered after symptomatic treatment. Conclusions: Dual biologic or small molecule therapy may be effective and safe for children with refractory PIBD in China. Full article

Background/Objectives: Several population pharmacokinetic models of vedolizumab (VDZ) are available for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients. However, their predictive performance in real-world clinical settings remains unknown. This study aims to externally evaluate the published VDZ pharmacokinetic models, focusing on their predictive performance and simulation-based clinical applicability. Methods: A literature search was conducted through PubMed to identify VDZ population pharmacokinetic models. A total of 114 VDZ concentrations from 106 IBD patients treated at the University Medical Center “Zvezdara”, Republic of Serbia, served as the external evaluation cohort. The predictive performance of the models was assessed using prediction- and simulation-based diagnostics. Furthermore, the models were utilized for Monte Carlo simulations to generate concentration–time profiles based on 24 covariate combinations specified within the models. Results: Four published pharmacokinetic models of VDZ were included in the evaluation. Using the external dataset, the median prediction error (MDPE) ranged from 13.82% to 25.57%, while the median absolute prediction error (MAPE) varied between 41.64% and 47.56%. None of the models fully met the combined criteria in the prediction-based diagnostics. However, in simulation-based diagnostics, pvcVPC showed satisfactory results, despite wide prediction intervals. Analysis of NPDE revealed that only the models by Rosario et al. and Okamoto et al. fulfilled the evaluation criteria. Simulation analysis further demonstrated that the median VDZ concentration remains above 12 μg/mL at week 22 during maintenance treatment for approximately 45–60% of patients with the best-case covariate combinations and an 8-week dosing frequency. Conclusions: None of the published models satisfied the combined criteria (MDPE, MAPE, percentages of prediction error within ±20% and ±30%), rendering them unsuitable for a priori predictions. However, two models demonstrated better suitability for simulation-based applications. Full article

Background/Objectives: Vedolizumab (VDZ) is approved in the treatment of patients with moderate to severe ulcerative colitis (UC) or Crohn’s disease (CD). VDZ exhibits considerable variability in its pharmacokinetic (PK) profile, and its exposure-response relationship is not yet fully understood. The aim was to investigate the variability in VDZ trough levels and PK parameters, to assess the relationship between VDZ PK and biochemical response, as well as clinical and endoscopic outcomes. Methods: We included 61 UC and 45 CD patients. Patients’ data and trough VDZ concentrations were retrospectively obtained. Population PK analysis was performed using non-linear mixed-effects modelling with NONMEM (version 7.5). Graphs and statistical analyses were performed using R (version 4.1.3). Results: In total, 116 trough VDZ concentrations from 106 patients were described by a two-compartment model. For a typical patient, clearance (CL) was estimated at 0.159 L/day, while in patients previously treated with anti-TNFα agents, VDZ CL increased by 26.4% on average. In univariate binary logistic regression, VDZ trough concentration was not statistically significant predictor of remission, whereas CL was. Moreover, combined CL and faecal calprotectin (FCP) were a statistically significant predictors of remission. The hazard ratio (HR) for CL above 0.1886 L/day was 0.35 (p = 0.05) and for FCP below 250 µg/g was 2.66 (p = 0.02) in a time-to-event analysis. Conclusions: Our population PK model incorporates the effect of prior anti-TNFα agents on CL, suggesting its association with more severe forms of IBD. VDZ CL emerged as a more robust and clinically relevant predictor of remission in IBD patients than trough concentration. Full article

In managing ulcerative colitis (UC), anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) agents are among the primary choices. Evidence suggests anti-TNF does not significantly increase malignancy risk (apart from lymphoma and melanoma), though uncertainties persist due to inconsistent long-term data. Kaposi’s sarcoma (KS), induced by human herpesvirus type-8 (HHV-8), is a multifocal neoplasm linked to immunosuppressive therapies, primarily affecting the skin and gastrointestinal tract. KS cases during anti-TNF therapy for UC are anecdotal. We report a rare occurrence of KS in the setting of the long-term use of the standard maintenance dose of infliximab (initiated in 2010) in a 56-year-old male patient with UC diagnosed in 2001. The patient underwent restorative proctocolectomy with ileal J-pouch-anal anastomosis in 2002 and subsequently developed chronic antibiotic-dependent pouchitis. Given the secondary loss of response to infliximab, a switch to vedolizumab was performed. In April 2024, the patient reported the presence of a skin lesion on the right leg. Following surgery, a rhomboid-shaped skin area was removed, encompassing the irregular, greyish KS lesion. The histopathological analysis confirmed the diagnosis of patch-like KS. We continued vedolizumab due to its gut-selective profile. The patient is in clinical remission and under dermatological follow-up with no lesion recurrence. Full article

Background/Objectives: Vitamin D (VD) has immunoregulatory properties, generating interest in its potential to influence therapeutic outcomes in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), other than affecting the expression of genes encoding enzymes and transporters involved in drug metabolism and transport. This study investigated VD-related single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) as predictors of clinical responses in patients with Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) treated with vedolizumab (VDZ) or ustekinumab (UST) after 3 (T3) and 12 months (T12), as well as the achievement of fecal calprotectin (FC) levels < 250 mg/kg, a marker of mucosal healing. Methods: In this prospective study, 103 patients (67 CD, 36 UC) were enrolled, 40 receiving VDZ and 63 receiving UST. SNPs in the genes CYP24A1, GC, CYP27B1, and VD receptor (VDR) were analyzed via polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and associated with clinical and laboratory outcomes. Results: UST therapy demonstrated a higher clinical response rate at T12 compared to VDZ (p = 0.03). A correlation was found between response at T3 and T12 (p = 0.0002). GC 1296 AC polymorphism negatively predicted response at T12, with 63.6% of non-responders carrying this genotype. CYP24A1 8620 AG was a negative predictor for achieving FC < 250 mg/kg (p = 0.045). CYP24A1 22776 CT and VDR Cdx2 GG increased the likelihood of presenting CD over UC (OR 3.40, p = 0.009 and OR 3.74, p = 0.047, respectively). Additionally, CYP27B1 −1260 GT and +2838 CT increased the likelihood of non-ileal CD (OR 3.13, p = 0.054; OR 7.02, p = 0.01). Conclusions: This study reveals associations between VD-SNPs, clinical response to VDZ and UST, and IBD phenotype and localization, supporting the development of personalized IBD treatment and warranting further validation. Full article

Abstract: The introduction of biological therapies has revolutionized inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) management. A critical consideration in developing these therapies is ensuring adequate drug concentrations at the site of action. While blood-based biomarkers have shown limited utility in optimizing treatment (except for TNF-alpha inhibitors and thiopurines), tissue drug concentrations may offer valuable insights. In antimicrobial therapies, tissue concentration monitoring is standard practice and could provide a new avenue for understanding the pharmacokinetics of biological and small-molecule therapies in IBD. Various methods exist for measuring tissue concentrations, including whole tissue sampling, MALDI-MSI, microdialysis, and fluorescent labeling. These techniques offer unique advantages, such as spatial drug-distribution mapping, continuous sampling, or cellular-level analysis. However, challenges remain, including sampling invasiveness, heterogeneity in tissue compartments, and a lack of standardized bioanalytical guidelines. Drug pharmacokinetics are influenced by multiple factors, including molecular properties, disease-induced changes in the gastrointestinal tract, and the timing of sample collection. For example, drug permeability, solubility, and interaction with transporters may vary between Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis. Research into the tissue concentrations of drugs like anti-TNF agents, ustekinumab, vedolizumab, and tofacitinib has shown variable correlations with clinical outcomes, suggesting potential roles for tissue concentration monitoring in therapeutic drug management. Although routine clinical application is not yet established, exploring tissue drug concentrations may enhance understanding of IBD pharmacotherapy. Full article

Background: Ustekinumab and vedolizumab represent both valid therapeutic options in patients with Crohn’s Disease. Data comparing the safety and efficacy of these drugs are indirect, with conflicting results reported. We aim to conduct a systematic review and metanalysis to assess the safety and effectiveness profile of ustekinumab and vedolizumab in patients with Crohn’s Disease, including only studies that applied propensity scores to reduce confounding bias. Methods: We identified 59 reports that compared ustekinumab and vedolizumab after a propensity score match analysis, of which 16 were assessed for eligibility, and finally, ten retrospective studies were included. The main outcomes considered were clinical steroid-free remission at 14 ± 4, 24 ± 4, and 52 ± 4 weeks, drug discontinuation rate, adverse events, serious infections, and hospitalization during the first year of treatment. Results: A total of 4398 patients were treated with ustekinumab (n = 2774, 63.1%) or vedolizumab (1624, 36.9%). Steroid-free clinical remission was not significantly different between ustekinumab and vedolizumab at 12 ± 4 weeks (OR 1.31, 95%CI 0.88–1.94, p = 0.180), at 24 ± 4 weeks (OR 1.18, 95%CI 0.79–1.75, p = 0.420), and at 52 ± 4 weeks (1.35, 95%CI 0.91–2.01, p = 0.140). In patients receiving ustekinumab, the rate of adverse events (OR 0.54, 95%CI 0.35–0.83, p = 0.005), infection (OR 0.61, 95%CI 0.47–0.80, p < 0.001) and the need of hospitalization at 1-year (OR 0.68, 95%CI 0.58–0.80, p < 0.001) appeared to be lower. Conclusion: Ustekinumab and vedolizumab do not significantly differ in inducing and maintaining clinical steroid-free remission, while ustekinumab was associated with a lower risk of serious infections and hospitalization during the first year of treatment. Full article

Background: Biologic agents used in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) may influence the pathophysiology of coexistent metabolic-dysfunction associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). This study primarily aimed to evaluate the six-month effect of infliximab or vedolizumab vs. no biologics on presumed hepatic steatosis in patients with IBD. Secondary endpoints were their effect on hepatic fibrosis and parameters related to hepatic metabolism. Methods: This prospective, non-randomized, controlled trial assigned adult bio-naïve patients with IBD into three groups: infliximab, vedolizumab, or controls (receiving no biologic). The baseline was the time of the initiation of biologic agents and the endpoint six months later. Hepatic steatosis was evaluated with transabdominal ultrasonography (Hamaguchi score), whereas controlled attenuation parameter (CAP), fatty liver index (FLI), and hepatic steatosis index (HSI) were used as surrogates. Hepatic fibrosis was evaluated with liver stiffness (LS), fibrosis-4 index (FIB-4), and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) fibrosis score. Results: Sixty-six patients were assigned to infliximab (n = 26), vedolizumab (n = 14), or control (n = 26); At the endpoint, the Hamaguchi score, CAP, FLI, and HSI were not different between groups. LS was not different between groups; however, FIB-4 was increased within all groups, and NAFLD fibrosis score was increased within infliximab and control groups, without significant biologic × time interactions. Conclusions: No positive or adverse effect of infliximab or vedolizumab vs. no biologic agents was shown on presumed hepatic steatosis in patients with IBD, who have not been previously exposed to biologic agents. Although no effect of both biologic agent on LS, a slight but significant increase in FIB-4 and NAFLD fibrosis score warrants further studying. Full article

Background and Aims: Postoperative recurrence in Crohn’s disease remains a significant clinical challenge, with high recurrence rates despite advancements in medical therapy. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of various treatments for managing postoperative recurrence following ileocolonic resection in Crohn’s disease. Methods: A comprehensive search of PubMed, Cochrane, and Scopus databases was performed to identify studies reporting on the therapeutic management of postoperative recurrence in Crohn’s disease. Studies encompassing patients with an endoscopic Rutgeerts score of at least I2 were included. Results: Ustekinumab showed promise, achieving significant endoscopic and clinical success in difficult-to-treat patients. Anti-TNF agents demonstrated superior endoscopic and clinical remission rates compared to mesalamine and azathioprine. Retreatment with anti-TNF therapy remained effective even after preoperative failure. Thalidomide showed efficacy in refractory Crohn’s disease, but carries significant toxicity risks, necessitating careful patient selection and monitoring. Combination therapies and non-pharmacologic strategies like enteral nutrition offer additional options, though patient compliance remains challenging. Conclusions: Personalized treatment plans based on individual risk factors and biomarkers are crucial. Infliximab is recommended as the first-line treatment, with ustekinumab and vedolizumab as alternatives in case of anti-TNF failure or intolerance. Early intervention, patient education, and ongoing evaluation are essential for optimizing long-term outcomes in managing postoperative recurrence in Crohn’s disease. Full article

Background: Few studies have compared the efficacy and safety of second-line biological therapies in ulcerative colitis (UC) patients with prior exposure to anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) therapy. We aim to compare the efficacy and safety between ustekinumab, vedolizumab, and tofacitinib, a current option as second-line biological therapy with different mechanisms in those patients. Methods: This retrospective multi-center study was conducted across five institutions from 2011 to 2022. We enrolled patients with moderate to severe UC who failed anti-TNF therapy and subsequently received ustekinumab, vedolizumab, or tofacitinib as second-line biological therapy. The outcomes were analyzed for clinical response/remission and endoscopic improvement/remission rates after induction therapy, drug persistency, and adverse events. Results: A total of 70 UC patients were included and grouped into ustekinumab (11 patients), vedolizumab (40 patients), and tofacitinib (19 patients) treatments. The clinical response/remission rates after induction therapy were similar between ustekinumab (90.9/81.8%), vedolizumab (92.5/65.0%), and tofacitinib (94.7/73.7%). There were no significant differences in the endoscopic improvement/remission rates between the three groups: 90.9/18.2% for ustekinumab, 72.5/12.5% for vedolizumab, and 84.2/26.3% for tofacitinib. Drug persistence was similar across the three agents (p = 0.130). Three patients of the tofacitinib group experienced adverse events (herpes zoster and hypertriglyceridemia). Conclusions: Based on real-world data, second-line biological therapy with ustekinumab, vedolizumab, and tofacitinib showed comparable efficacy in patients with moderate to severe UC with prior exposure to anti-TNF therapy. Full article

The aim of this paper is to raise awareness of MC as a clinically significant condition and to highlight its under-recognition, risk factors, diagnosis, management, and complications. This paper underlines the diagnostic and therapeutic challenges associated with the often nonspecific symptoms of MC. In order to create this article, we reviewed available articles found in the PubMed database and searched for articles using the Google Scholar platform. Microscopic colitis (MC) is a chronic inflammatory bowel disease, classified into three types: lymphocytic, collagenous, and unspecified. The average age of onset of MC is around 62–65 years and the disease is more common in women than men (nine times more common). The main symptom of MC is watery diarrhoea without blood, other symptoms include defecatory urgency, faecal incontinence, abdominal pain, nocturnal bowel movements, and weight loss. Once considered a rare disease, MC is now being diagnosed with increasing frequency, but diagnosis remains difficult. To date, a number of causative factors for MC have been identified, including smoking, alcohol consumption, medications (including NSAIDs, PPIs, SSRIs, and ICPIs), genetic factors, autoimmune diseases, bile acid malabsorption, obesity, appendicitis, and intestinal dysbiosis. It may be difficult to recognize and should be differentiated from inflammatory bowel diseases (Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis), irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), coeliac disease, infectious bowel disease, and others. Diagnosis involves biopsy at colonoscopy and histopathological evaluation of the samples. Treatment consists of budesonide oral (the gold standard) or enema. Alternatives include bile acid sequestrants (cholestyramine, colesevelam, and colestipol), biologics (infliximab, adalimumab, and vedolizumab), thiopurines, methotrexate, and rarely, surgery. Full article

Ulcerative colitis (UC) management encompasses conventional and advanced treatments, including biological therapy and small molecules. Surgery, particularly in the form of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA), is indicated in cases of refractory/severe disease. IPAA can lead to acute complications (e.g., acute pouchitis) as well as late complications, including chronic inflammatory disorders of the pouch. Chronic pouchitis, including the antibiotic-dependent (CADP) and antibiotic-refractory (CARP) forms, represents a significant and current therapeutic challenge due to the substantial need for evidence regarding viable treatment options. Biological therapies have shown promising results, with infliximab, adalimumab, ustekinumab, and vedolizumab demonstrating some efficacy in chronic pouchitis; however, robust randomized clinical trials are only available for vedolizumab. This narrative review focuses on the evidence concerning small molecules in chronic pouchitis, specifically Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors and sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor (S1P-R) modulators. According to the preliminary studies and reports, Tofacitinib shows a potential effectiveness in CARP. Upadacitinib presents variable outcomes from the case series, necessitating further evaluation. Filgotinib and ozanimod demonstrate anecdotal efficacy. This review underscores the need for high-quality studies and real-world registries to develop robust guidelines for advanced therapies in post-IPAA inflammatory disorders, supported by vigilant clinical monitoring and ongoing education from international IBD specialist societies. Full article

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic inflammatory disorder of the large intestine. Data on the comparative effectiveness of biological therapies such as vedolizumab (VDZ) and ustekinumab (UST) remain limited. This retrospective study compared the effectiveness and safety of VDZ and UST in UC patients. Between November 2018 and November 2023, 106 patients were included: 64 received VDZ and 42 received UST. Bio-failure was significantly higher (p = 0.005) in the UST group versus the VDZ group. The remission rates at 6, 22, and 54 weeks in VDZ group were 51.6%, 61.3%, and 66.7%. The remission rates at 8, 24, and 56 weeks in the UST group were 66.7%, 65.0%, and 66.7%, respectively. Both treatments were comparable in inducing and maintaining clinical remission over 54–56 weeks, with no significant differences observed in the Lichtiger clinical activity index. Subgroup analyses highlighted the potential short-term effectiveness of UST among cases of bio-failure and a white blood cell level ≥ 9000/µL. Safety profiles were generally favorable, with no significant adverse events. Usutekinumab demonstrated effectiveness as a salvage therapy in patients who failed VDZ. Despite the increased disease severity in the UST group compared to the VDZ group, both groups demonstrated similar remission rates, suggesting UST shows significant efficacy even in moderate to severe UC. Full article

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), which encompasses both ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn’s disease (CD), is a major health burden worldwide. There are increasing concerns surrounding the impacts of this disease due to significant rises in the prevalence rates of IBD across the world. In consideration of the complexities of managing IBD along with this marked rise in prevalence and incidence, developing new forms of treatment for this condition has become a major priority. In recent years, a potential new form of treatment for IBD has emerged in the form of biologic therapies. While there is a high level of optimism due to the development of these therapies, there is also a clear need to evaluate their effectiveness, and their overall safety profiles. For this review, we have evaluated three specific biologics used for the treatment IBD. More precisely, the focus of this review is to analyze and critically appraise the literature for vedolizumab, ustekinumab, and golimumab, and determine their roles in the management of UC and CD, respectively. After doing so, we have also briefly synthesized important new findings regarding the role of dietary and nutritional approaches. In doing so, we have aimed to contextualize the findings regarding biologics, and, in order to evaluate potential new treatment approaches for the future to augment biologic therapies, we have discussed the potential for combined approaches that incorporate the usage of both biologics and nutritional interventions for patients. Full article