Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Correspondence
  • Published:

Caution in the use of populism to describe distributional considerations of climate policy

Nature Climate Change volume 14, page 886 (2024)Cite this article

Subjects

Balancing effectiveness and broad social appeal of climate policy is not straightforward. Integration of distributional considerations into both the substance and framing of policy is one way to pursue this elusive balance. Driesen et al.1 provide helpful insight into the potential flow-on effects of the integration of climate and industrial policy. They highlight examples, particularly including the US Inflation Reduction Act, that incorporate protectionist industry interventions that the authors argue may paradoxically hinder coordinated efforts to mitigate climate change, for instance, by slowing the diffusion and availability of critical decarbonization technologies. Driesen et al. position these risks as stemming from a populist approach to climate policy.

In this brief Correspondence, I promote caution around the use of populism to describe substantive features of climate policy, separate to the political rhetoric that may be used to advance policy agendas.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on SpringerLink
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Driesen, D. M., Mehling, M. A. & Popp, D. Nat. Clim. Change 14, 414–416 (2024).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Norris, P. Party Polit. 26, 697–717 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Colvin, R. M. Nat. Energy 8, 776–778 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Jakob, M. et al. Nat. Clim. Change 10, 704–707 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bez, C., Bosetti, V., Colantone, I. & Zanardi, M. Nat. Clim. Change 13, 1131–1135 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hekkert, M. Nat. Sustain. 7, 512–513 (2024).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Rodríguez-Pose, A. Camb. J. Reg. Econ. Soc. 11, 189–209 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Mildenberger, M. & Stokes, L. C. Boston Rev. 45, 122–137 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Eckersley, R. Environ. Polit. 30, 245–265 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bidwell, D. & Sovacool, B. K. Nat. Energy 8, 317–320 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Crawford School of Public Policy, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia

    R. M. Colvin

Authors
  1. R. M. Colvin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. M. Colvin.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Colvin, R.M. Caution in the use of populism to describe distributional considerations of climate policy. Nat. Clim. Chang. 14, 886 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-024-02107-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-024-02107-x

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing