main diagnosis
Recently Published Documents

The general objective was to determine risk factors associated with pressure ulcers. Hypothesis: Intrinsic and extrinsic risk factors are significantly associated in the development of pressure ulcers. The research was applied, correlational, retrospective, quantitative. The population was 180 Clinical Histories, of which 60 belonged to patients who presented pressure ulcers (Cases) and 120 to patients who did not present pressure ulcers (Controls). The instrument was a data collection sheet; the information being processed through the SSPS Vs 22 program. The Chi square statistical test, the P - Value was less than 5%. The results were; age, sex, mobility, incontinence, nutrition, state of consciousness, degree of dependence and main diagnosis are intrinsic risk factors for the appearance of pressure ulcers, also extrinsic factors; Hospital stay, availability of equipment and materials, postural changes, body hygiene, massages, location of pressure ulcers and stages are risk factors for the formation of pressure ulcers. Conclusion: intrinsic and extrinsic factors are significantly associated with the development of pressure ulcers in adulthood and older adults.

Aim: to assess whether participation in cardiac rehabilitation affects the probability of returning to work after ischaemic heart disease. Methods: the study population consisted of 24,509 patients (18–70 years of age) discharged from an inpatient admission at a Danish hospital during 2014–2018 and who were working before their admission. Only patients with a percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting surgery procedure and ICD-10 codes I20–I25 as their main diagnosis or ICD-10 codes I21, I240, I248 or I249 as secondary diagnosis during an emergency admission were included. Exposure was defined as participation in cardiac rehabilitation ( N = 15,742), and binary indicator of being at work in the last week of a given month were used as primary outcomes. Coarsened exact matching (CEM) of exposed and unexposed patients was used to reduce selection bias. Logistic regression models were applied on the matched population ( N = 15,762). Results: Less deprived and less comorbid patients were more likely to receive cardiac rehabilitation. CEM succeeded in arriving at a population where this selection was reduced and in this population we found that patients who received cardiac rehabilitation had a lower probability of returning to work after 3 months (OR 0.81, 95%CI: 0.77–0.84), a higher but insignificant probability after 6 (OR 1.02, 95%CI: 0.97–1.08), and a higher probability after 9 (OR 1.08, 95%CI: 1.02–1.15) and 12 months (OR 1.20, 95%CI: 1.13–1.28). Conclusions: Deprived and comorbid patients have lower use of cardiac rehabilitation. In a matched population where this bias is reduced, cardiac rehabilitation will increase the probability of returning to work.

Introduction: The outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has recently become a major problem affecting thousands of individuals around the world. It is understood that a significant proportion of patients infected with COVID-19 have disturbed liver function tests. This is a case report of a patient with liver cirrhosis and COVID-19. Presenting Complaints and Investigations: A 39 year old female patient was admitted in AVBRH on 06/02/2021 with chief complaint of distension of abdomen, breathlessness, shortness of breath, reduced urine output over last 3 months. She had skin lesions over the hand, foot, abdomen and back with itching since 4 months. Physical examination, blood investigations and abdominal ultrasound showed cirrhosis of liver with gross ascites seen clinically. She had mild splenomegaly and gall bladder was enlarged. Laboratory tests showed elevated total bilirubin level. In peripheral blood examination, RBC count was low (3.66m/cu mm), Haemoglobin level was 8.2 gm/dl, Platelets count was low (1.19 lakh per cu. mm). WBC count was 3600 cu mm. Doctor diagnosed this as the case of cirrhosis of liver with pemphigus vulgaris with COVID-19. Past History: 6 months ago, patient was admitted in Aarogyadham hospital Yawatmal with chief complaint of abdominal pain, loss of appetites, fever. On ultrasonography, she had splenomegaly for which she took the treatment. The Main Diagnosis, Therapeutic Intervention and Outcomes: This case was diagnosed as a case of COVID-19 with Cirrhosis of liver. Interferon alpha 2b solution was given for 10 days to help improve the immunity. Tab. Ursoldiolis (ursodeoxycholic acid) was used to dissolve gallstones. Conclusion: Good clinical assessment, appropriate care, good nursing care by trained nurses and appropriate treatment can save lives even in complicated COVID-19 infected cases.

Introduction: Sepsis is a life-threatening organ failure that occurs in severely ill patients as a result of a primary infectious cause or subsequent infection of injured tissues. The systemic effects of sepsis have been extensively studied, and evidence of local alterations and repercussions in the intestinal mucosal compartment is gradually characterizing sepsis-related changes in the gut. The current study focuses on sepsis-induced intestinal barrier failure, which includes increased epithelial permeability, which may allow bacterial translocation. The small bowel, commonly known as the small intestine, is roughly 1 inch in diameter and 20 to 30 feet long. It has a lot of folds to help it fit inside the abdominal cavity. The small bowel is connected to the stomach on one end and the big intestine on the other. Patient information: He was 63 years old male admitted to Acharya Vinoba Bhave Rural hospital sawangi meghe Wardha in MICU ward with chief complaints of altering sensorium. Low urine output vomiting, loss of appetite, swelling of the abdomen crampy abdominal pain that comes and goes. The Main Diagnosis, Therapeutic Intervention and Outcomes: A CT scan revealed a thicker transverse colon wall. His flexible sigmoidoscopy revealed “patchy inflammation and an isolated area of severe deep ulceration with nodularity and edema,” according to the report. The patient was given a preliminary diagnosis of "Inflammatory Bowel Disease—likely Crohn's," and was treated with steroids and Patient was done colonoscopy and course of inj. hydrocortisone, inj. Neomol, inj. levipril. Conclusion: In the case of acute small-bowel obstruction, helical CT is a highly sensitive approach for diagnosing or ruling out intestinal ischemia. In patients with significant trauma who are being assessed for sepsis of unknown origin, abdominal computed tomographic scans accurately identify intra-abdominal foci of infection. This patient was diagnosed with small bowel intimation and sepsis.

Background: After the COVID-19 pandemic reached France in January 2020, a national lockdown including school closures was officially imposed from March 17, 2020, to May 10, 2020. Pediatric intensive care units (PICUs) admit critically ill infants, children and teenagers with severe acute conditions, in particular infectious and traumatic diseases. We hypothesized that PICU admissions would be considerably modified by the lockdown.Aims: The objectives of the study were to describe the type of admissions to French PICUs and to compare the occupation of PICU beds according to local epidemic conditions during the French national lockdown period, compared with the same period the previous year.Methods: We conducted a retrospective multicenter study in 14 French PICUs. All children aged from 7 days to 18 years admitted to one of the 14 participating PICUs over two 3-month period (March 1, 2020, to May 31, 2020 and March 1, 2019, to May 31, 2019) were included. Analysis was based on data extracted from the medicalized information systems program (a national database used in all French hospitals, into which all admissions and their diagnoses are coded for the purpose of calculating hospital funding). Each main diagnosis was reclassified in 13 categories, corresponding to normal PICU admissions.Results: We analyzed a total of 3,040 admissions, 1,323 during the 2020 study period and 1,717 during the same period in 2019. Total admissions decreased by 23% [incidence rate ratio (IRR) 0.77, 95% CI 0.71–0.83, p < 0.001], in particular for viral respiratory infections (−36%, IRR 0.64, 95% CI 0.44–0.94, p = 0.001). Admissions for almost all other diagnostic categories decreased, except intoxications and diabetes which increased, while admissions for cardiac and hemodynamic disorders were stable. Patient age and the sex ratio did not differ between the two periods. Median length of stay in the PICU was longer in 2020 [4 (IQR 2–9) vs. 3 (IQR 1–8) days, p = 0.002] in 2019. Mortality remained stable.Conclusions: In this large national study, we showed a decrease in the number of PICU admissions. The most severe patients were still admitted to intensive care and overall mortality remained stable.

Advanced clinical practitioner (ACP) roles require a broad range of knowledge of both medical and surgical medicine and the ability to work autonomously in a variety of settings. Despite around half of the UK adult population presenting with a skin condition requiring attention, this is something many ACPs feel unprepared to be consulted on. However, due to the complexity and large number of potential diagnoses, it is imperative that ACPs develop their confidence and knowledge to diagnosis, request investigations and initiate treatment for a patient with a skin complaint. In the first part of this clinical review the authors presented the key elements of history taking, consultation and assessment of the skin. This second clinical review discusses the main differential diagnoses, mimics, common investigations and treatments. This article is designed to support novice ACPs from acute hospital settings to primary care to develop a foundation of understanding in the main diagnosis and treatment options that should be considered following a clinical assessment of patients’ skin outside the dermatology setting.

ObjectivesLittle is known about resident physicians being treated at physician health programmes around the world despite the fact that it is a highly demanding training period. This study aims to describe the profiles of resident physicians accessing a specialised mental health service in Spain over a 20-year period and to compare them to consultant-grade physicians.DesignRetrospective observational study.SettingMedical records of the Galatea Care Programme for Sick Physicians.Participants1846 physicians registered at the Barcelona Medical Council-Association and admitted to the programme from January 1998 to December 2018.Primary and secondary outcome measuresNumber of admissions, sociodemographic and clinical variables, including medical specialty, main diagnosis and need of hospitalisation.ResultsResidents accounted for 18.1% (n=335) of the sample and admissions increased over the years. Most residents (n=311; 94.5%) and consultant-grade physicians (n=1391; 92.8%) were self-referred. The most common specialty among residents was family medicine (n=107; 31.9%), followed by internal medicine (n=18; 5.4%), paediatrics (n=14; 4.2%), psychiatry (n=13; 3.9%) and anaesthesiology (n=13; 3.9%). Residents, regardless of year of training, mainly asked for help because of adjustment (n=131; 39.1%), affective (n=77; 23%), anxiety disorders (n=40; 18.8%) and addictions (n=19; 5.7%). There were no significant differences between groups in the main diagnosis and in the variables related to need of hospitalisation. The percentage of residents accessing the programme was higher than in the reference population registered at the Barcelona Medical Council-Association (18.1% vs 7.6%; z=7.2, p<0.001) as was the percentage of family medicine residents (31.9% vs 19.6%; z=5.7, p<0.001).ConclusionsResidents are more likely than consultant-grade physicians to seek help when suffering from mental disorders. Local primary prevention actions since the beginning of their training period and having access to a well-known highly reliable programme may partly explain these findings.

IntroductionRobotic surgery (RS) can offer benefits compared to freehand surgery (FS) in the treatment of patients with spinal diseases. The aim of this study was to assess efficacy and safety of RS versus FS in spinal fusion. The outcomes considered were accuracy in the placement of pedicle screws, surgical times, hospital stay, exposure to radiation, and complications.MethodsA systematic review and meta-analysis were performed by researchers at the Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII). Studies published until June 2019 in the English, Spanish, or French languages were retrieved. The data analyses and risk of bias assessments were undertaken using RevMan 5.3.ResultsEight randomized controlled trials including 610 patients (RS: 308, FS: 302) were found. The mean age of the patients ranged from 56 to 68 years in the FS group and from 55 to 68 years in the RS group. The percentage of women included ranged from 46 to 73 percent undergoing FS and from 33 to 70 percent undergoing RS. The main diagnosis was degenerative spine disease. The number of screws implanted ranged from 22 to 584 for FS and 23 to 532 for RS. The robots used were the SpineAssist and Renaissance Guidance System (Mazor Robotics, Ltd) and the TiRobot® Orthopaedic Robotic System (Beijing Tinavi Medical Technologies Co., Ltd). Pedicle screw placement within the safety zone (Grades A and B on the Gertzbein and Robbins scale) ranged from 93 to 100 percent in FS and from 85 to 100 percent in RS (relative risk 1.0, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.99–1.03; p = 0.36) (I2=75%; p = 0.0005). Regarding intervention time, the meta-analysis showed a mean difference (MD) of 15.2 minutes (95% CI 5.35–25.05; p = 0.002) (I2 = 0%; p = 0.39) in favor of FS. The MD in hospital stay was 0.36 days (95% CI -1.03–0.31; p = 0.30) (I2 = 62%; p = 0.07), which was not statistically significant. Contradictory results were found for fluoroscopy time, although RS was associated with a lower radiation dose than FS (p < 0.05). In relation to safety, studies only reported on rates of surgical revision, which ranged from 0 to 2 after FS and from 0 to 10 after RS. The risk or bias was unclear in most studies.ConclusionsWe found no conclusive results suggesting benefits for spinal fusion using RS compared with FS. Further research with adequate selection of patients, type of robot, and comparator is needed.

AbstractThe concept of progressive fibrosing interstitial lung disease (PF-ILD) has recently emerged. However, real-life proportion of PF-ILDs outside IPF is still hard to evaluate. Therefore, we sought to estimate the proportion of PF-ILD in our ILD cohort. We also determined the proportion of ILD subtypes within PF-ILD and investigated factors associated with PF-ILDs. Finally, we quantified interobserver agreement between radiologists for the assessment of fibrosis. We reviewed the files of ILD patients discussed in multidisciplinary discussion between January 1st 2017 and December 31st 2019. Clinical data, pulmonary function tests (PFTs) and high-resolution computed tomography (HRCTs) were centrally reviewed. Fibrosis was defined as the presence of traction bronchiectasis, reticulations with/out honeycombing. Progression was defined as a relative forced vital capacity (FVC) decline of ≥ 10% in ≤ 24 months or 5% < FVC decline < 10% and progression of fibrosis on HRCT in ≤ 24 months. 464 consecutive ILD patients were included. 105 had a diagnosis of IPF (23%). Most frequent non-IPF ILD were connective tissue disease (CTD)-associated ILD (22%), hypersensitivity pneumonitis (13%), unclassifiable ILD (10%) and sarcoidosis (8%). Features of fibrosis were common (82% of CTD-ILD, 81% of HP, 95% of uILD). After review of HRCTs and PFTs, 68 patients (19% of non-IPF ILD) had a PF-ILD according to our criteria. Interobserver agreement for fibrosis between radiologists was excellent (Cohen’s kappa 0.86). The main diagnosis among PF-ILD were CTD-ILD (36%), HP (22%) and uILD (20%). PF-ILD patients were significantly older than non-F-ILD (P = 0.0005). PF-ILDs represent about 20% of ILDs outside IPF. This provides an estimation of the proportion of patients who might benefit from antifibrotics. Interobserver agreement between radiologists for the diagnosis of fibrotic ILD is excellent.

ObjectiveParamedic redirection from emergency department (ED) to subacute centres may be more beneficial for some patients, though little is known about which patients are potentially appropriate. We examined whether patient characteristics were associated with ED visits when the main intervention was suitable to be performed in a subacute centre.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective observational study using the National Ambulatory Care Reporting System from 2014 to 2018 in Ontario, Canada. We included all adult patients transported by paramedics and had a main physician intervention recorded. We used results of a RAND/UCLA modified Delphi study to categorise patients into either ED or a subacute care (urgent care and/or general practice centre) based on their main intervention. An independent logistic regression model was analysed for each subacute centre.ResultsA total of 2 394 072 ED visits were included; 59% of ED interventions were categorised as ‘urgent care’, 27% ‘ED only’, 9% either ‘urgent care’ or ‘general practice’ and 5% had an intervention not previously classified. ED visits suitable for ‘general practice’ had the highest percentage of patients discharged, while ‘ED only’ had the lowest. Lower medical acuity, younger age, time of triage in evening and overnight, and discharged from ED were independently associated with both subacute centres. ‘Urgent care’ visits/interventions were associated with an ED main diagnosis of the respiratory system (OR 3.49), while ‘general practice’ visits were associated with mental health disorders (OR 9.85) and injury/poison/consequences of external causes (OR 3.38).ConclusionsThe majority of ED visits had a main intervention that could have potentially been conducted in a subacute centre. We identified characteristics and diagnostic patterns associated with ED visits when the main intervention was categorised as a subacute centre intervention. This study contributes knowledge to inform which patients are potentially appropriate for paramedic redirection.