health assessment questionnaire
Recently Published Documents

AbstractChronic rheumatological manifestations similar to those of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are described after chikungunya virus infection. We aimed to compare the relevance of joint counts and symptoms to clinical outcomes in RA and chronic chikungunya disease. Forty patients with chronic chikungunya arthralgia and 40 patients with RA were enrolled in a cross-sectional study. The association of tenderness and swelling, clinically assessed in 28 joints, and patient evaluations of pain and musculoskeletal stiffness with modified Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) and quality of life (QoL) assessments were investigated. Tender and swollen joint counts, pain and stiffness scores were all associated with the HAQ disability index in RA (all r > 0.55, p ≤ 0.0002), but only stiffness was significantly associated with disability in chikungunya (r = 0.38, p = 0.02). Joint counts, pain and stiffness were also associated with most QoL domains in RA patients. In contrast, in chikungunya disease, tender joint counts were associated only with one QoL domain and swollen joints for none, while pain and stiffness were associated with several domains. Our results confirm the relevance of joint counts in RA, but suggest that in chronic chikungunya disease, joint counts have more limited value. Stiffness and pain score may be more important to quantify chikungunya arthritis impact.

ABSTRACT Objectives This study aimed to evaluate the association between locomotive syndrome (LS) and frailty in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. Methods Subjects were 538 RA patients (female, 72.9%; mean age ± standard deviation, 66.8 ± 13.4 years). LS and frailty were defined as ≥16 points on the 25-question Geriatric Locomotive Function Scale (Stage ≥2) and ≥8 points on the Kihon Checklist (KCL), respectively. Results There were 214 subjects with Stage ≥2 LS (39.8%) and 213 subjects with frailty (39.6%). Among subjects with Stage 0, 1, 2, and 3 LS, 11.0%, 21.9%, 48.3%, and 84.6% had frailty, respectively. The KCL points for cognitive and psychosocial factors had no significant differences across LS stages. Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that the Health Assessment Questionnaire was independently associated with frailty and LS stage, and the Clinical Disease Activity Index was associated with LS stage but not frailty. Conclusions As LS worsens in RA patients, the likelihood of developing physical frailty increases. RA patients with a low LS stage can still develop frailty, and suppressing disease activity may not be sufficient to prevent frailty. These findings highlight the need to screen for frailty in RA patients and consider appropriate interventions based on each patient’s condition, focusing on nonphysical factors.

Abstract Purpose of Review To update the clinical value of a patient self-report multidimensional health assessment questionnaire (MDHAQ). Recent Findings The MDHAQ includes 10 individual quantitative scores for physical function, pain, patient global assessment, fatigue, sleep, anxiety, depression, morning stiffness, change in status, and exercise status, and 5 indices, RAPID3 (routine assessment of patient index data) to assess clinical status in all diseases studied, FAST3 (fibromyalgia assessment screening tool) and MDHAQ-Dep (depression) to screen for fibromyalgia and/or depression, RADAI self-report of specific painful joints and joint count, and a symptom checklist for review of systems, and recognition of flares and medication adverse events. The MDHAQ also uniquely queries traditional “medical” information concerning comorbidities, falls, trauma, new symptoms, illnesses, surgeries, hospitalizations, emergencies, medication changes, and medication side effects. Three MDHAQ versions include long for new patients, short for new and return patients, and telemedicine. An electronic MDHAQ (eMDHAQ) has been developed with software that can interface with any electronic medical record (EMR) through the HL7 FHIR standard. However, EMR collaboration and implementation have proven difficult. Summary An MDHAQ provides a quantitative overview of patient status with far more information and documentation than an interview, involving minimal extra work for the physician.

La artritis reumatoide (AR) es una patología crónica que genera limitación funcional, impactando en la calidad de vida de los pacientes y de su entorno familiar. El objetivo de este estudio fue estimar la prevalencia de AR en las comunidades de pueblos originarios qom y wichi de la ciudad de Rosario y Misión Chaqueña (Salta); además de comparar las características entre ambas. Se realizó un estudio transversal, epidemiológico, de base comunitaria, utilizando la metodología Community Oriented Program for the Control of Rheumatic Diseases (COPCORD). Los individuos con dolor músculo—esquelético (casos positivos) fueron evaluados en forma consecutiva por médicos generales y referenciados dentro de la semana al reumatólogo para diagnóstico y eventual tratamiento. La prevalencia de AR fue de 3% (qom) y 3.2% (wichi). Las características de la AR fueron similares en ambas comunidades en relación a la actividad medida por Disease Activity Score—28 (DAS 28) (p 0,341) pero no en la limitación funcional medida por Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ) (p 0,031). Existió un retraso promedio en el diagnóstico de 2 años. El 45% y 66% (p 0,100) de los pacientes qom y wichi tuvieron cambios radiográficos propios de una enfermedad avanzada. Más del 90% fueron seropositivos para factor reumatoideo y anticuerpos antipéptido citrulinado cíclico. El 42% y 29% (p 0,246) de los pacientes qom y wichi tenían antecedentes familiares de AR. Las prevalencias de AR en ambas comunidades fueron altas, con marcada agresividad de la enfermedad, así como impactante limitación funcional. El retraso en el diagnóstico es un factor fundamental para mejorar el pronóstico de esta patología.

Background:Therapy choice and therapy change depend on the ability to accurately assess patients’ disease activity. The clinical assessments used to evaluate treatment response in rheumatoid arthritis have inherent variability, normally considered as measurement error, intra-observer variability or within subject variability. Each contribute to variability in deriving response status as defined by composite measures such as the ACR or EULAR criteria, particularly when a one-time observed measurement lies near the boundary defining response or non-response. To select an optimal therapeutic strategy in the burgeoning age of precision medicine in rheumatology, achieve the lowest disease activity and maximize long-term health outcomes for each patient, improved treatment response definitions are needed.Objectives:Develop a high-confidence definition of treatment response and non-response in rheumatoid arthritis that exceeds the expected variability of subcomponents in the composite response criteria.Methods:A Monte Carlo simulation approach was used to assess ACR50 and EULAR response outcomes in 100 rheumatoid arthritis patients who had been treated for 6 months with a TNF inhibitor therapy. Monte Carlo simulations were run with 2000 iterations implemented with measurement variability derived for each clinical assessment: tender joint count, swollen joint count, Health Assessment Questionnaire disability index (HAQ-DI), patient pain assessment, patient global assessment, physician global assessment, serum C-reactive protein level (CRP) and disease activity score 28-joint count with CRP.1-3 Each iteration of the Monte Carlo simulation generated one outcome with a value of 0 or 1 indicating non-responder or responder, respectively.Results:A fidelity score, calculated separately for ACR50 and EULAR response, was defined as an aggregated score from 2000 iterations reported as a fraction that ranges from 0 to 1. The fidelity score depicted a spectrum of response covering strong non-responders, inconclusive statuses and strong responders. A fidelity score around 0.5 typified a response status with extreme variability and inconclusive clinical response to treatment. High-fidelity scores were defined as >0.7 or <0.3 for responders and non-responders, respectively, meaning that the simulated clinical response status label among all simulations agreed at least 70% of the time. High-confidence true responders were considered as those patients with high-fidelity outcomes in both ACR50 and EULAR outcomes.Conclusion:A definition of response to treatment should exceed the expected variability of the clinical assessments used in the composite measure of therapeutic response. By defining high-confidence responders and non-responders, the true impact of therapeutic efficacy can be determined, thus forging a path to development of better treatment options and advanced precision medicine tools in rheumatoid arthritis.References:[1]Cheung, P. P., Gossec, L., Mak, A. & March, L. Reliability of joint count assessment in rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic literature review. Semin Arthritis Rheum43, 721-729, doi:10.1016/j.semarthrit.2013.11.003 (2014).[2]Uhlig, T., Kvien, T. K. & Pincus, T. Test-retest reliability of disease activity core set measures and indices in rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis68, 972-975, doi:10.1136/ard.2008.097345 (2009).[3]Maska, L., Anderson, J. & Michaud, K. Measures of functional status and quality of life in rheumatoid arthritis: Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ), Modified Health Assessment Questionnaire (MHAQ), Multidimensional Health Assessment Questionnaire (MDHAQ), Health Assessment Questionnaire II (HAQ-II), Improved Health Assessment Questionnaire (Improved HAQ), and Rheumatoid Arthritis Quality of Life (RAQoL). Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 63 Suppl 11, S4-13, doi:10.1002/acr.20620 (2011).Disclosure of Interests:Vibeke Strand Consultant of: Abbvie, Amgen, Arena, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celltrion, Galapagos, Genentech/Roche, Gilead, GSK, Ichnos, Inmedix, Janssen, Kiniksa, Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron, Samsung, Sandoz, Sanofi, Setpoint, UCB, Stanley Cohen: None declared, Lixia Zhang Shareholder of: Scipher Medicine Corporation, Employee of: Scipher Medicine Corporation, Ted Mellors Shareholder of: Scipher Medicine Corporation, Employee of: Scipher Medicine Corporation, Alex Jones Shareholder of: Scipher Medicine Corporation, Employee of: Scipher Medicine Corporation, Johanna Withers Shareholder of: Scipher Medicine Corporation, Employee of: Scipher Medicine Corporation, Viatcheslav Akmaev Shareholder of: Scipher Medicine Corporation, Employee of: Scipher Medicine Corporation

Objectives:Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic inflammatory disease that involves various joints in whole body. For evaluation of daily life activities (ADL), modified Health Assessment Questionnaire (mHAQ) is usually used. This index configures eight ADL functions these are separated by predominant extremities. This study aimed to evaluate how involved joint affect ADL predominantly in real world setting.Methods:A total of 24,450 times of consultation with RA patient were visited in the institute. Here, patient with RA was interviewed every another visit, and involved joint in whole body, pain score with visual analog scale (PS-VAS), and mHAQ were recorded. Involved joints were divided by four regions in accordance with joint size and part; small joint in upper extremities (US), large joint in upper extremities (UL), small joint in lower extremities (LS), and large joint in lower extremities (LL). mHAQ was also separately evaluated in accordance with predominant regions; upper extremities predominant mHAQ (mHAQ_UE), and lower extremities predominant mHAQ (mHAQ_LE). Adding to these parameters, as an index for disease activity monitoring, components of the simplified disease activity index score (SDAI) was also recorded. Relationship between mHAQ for each predominant extremities, and these parameters and sex, age, disease duration of RA, anti-cyclic citrullinated polypeptide antibodies (ACPA), rheumatoid factor (RF), and Sharp/van der Heijde score (SHS), were statistically evaluated using linear regression analysis.Results:mHAQ_UE significantly correlated with age, ACPA and RF titre, SHS, tenderness joint count (TJC), patient’s global assessment (PGA), evaluator’s global assessment (EGA), C-reactive protein (CRP), US, UL, LL, and PS-vas, whereas mHAQ-LE significantly correlated with all parameters that demonstrated significant correlation with mHAQ-UE and disease duration. mHAQ also correlated with all parameters those that demonstrated significant correlation with mHAQ-LE. Interestingly, all of mHAQ-UE, mHAQ-LE, and mHAQ did not correlated significantly with swollen joint count (SJC) and LS.Conclusion:mHAQ is influenced by various factors, however, SJC and involvement of small joint in lower extremities did not affect mHAQ.Disclosure of Interests:None declared

Background:The Cochin 17-item Scleroderma Functional (CSF-17) Scale is a patient-reported outcome measure evaluating activities and participation in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc).Objectives:The aim of the present study was to translate and cross-culturally adapt the CSF-17 into the Turkish language and investigate its convergent validity and reliability in Turkish-speaking patients with SSc.Methods:The CSF-17 was cross-culturally adapted according to Beaton’s guideline. Participants completed CSF-17 Scale, Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire (SHAQ), Short Form-12 (SF-12) Health Survey and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Internal consistency and test-retest reliability were determined interpreting Cronbach’s alpha and Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) values, respectively. Convergent validity was tested using Pearson’s correlation coefficient.Results:Fifty-six patients with SSc were enrolled in the study. Cronbach’s alpha and ICC values of the CSF-17 total score were found to be as 0.963 and 0.958, respectively, indicating excellent reliability. As for the convergent validity, it was determined that CSF-17 total score has a good correlation with SHAQ. Correlations of subscales of CSF-17 with subscales of SF-12 and HADS ranged from poor to moderate (Table 1).Conclusion:Tukish version of CSF-17 met the set criteria of reliability and convergent validity. According to the results of the analysis, it was concluded that the Turkish version of the CSF-17 is a reliable and valid tool for Turkish-speaking SSc patients.References:[1]Daste C, Abdoul H, Foissac F et al. Development of a new patient-reported outcome measure to assess activities and participation in people with systemic sclerosis: the Cochin 17-item Scleroderma Functional scale. British Journal of Dermatology 2020; 183:710-718.[2]Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F et al. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine 2000; 25(24):3186-3191.[3]Karadag DT, Karakas F, Tekeoglu S et al. Validation of Turkish version of the Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire. Clin Rheumatol, 2019,38(7):1917-1923.[4]Ware Jr J, Kosinski M, Keller SD. A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med. Care, 1996,34:220-233.[5]Zigmond A, Snaith R. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand, 1983,67:361-370.[6]Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol, 2007,60:34–42.Table 1.Convergent validity of the CSF-17ScalesCSF-17Section ASection BTotalSHAQ0.680**0.640**0.702**HADS-A0.405*0.472**HADS-D0.460**0.605**SF-12 MCS-0.482**-0.491**SF-12 PCS-0.745**-0.700**CSF-17: Cochin 17-item Scleroderma Functional scale, SHAQ: Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire, HADS-A: Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale-Anxiety, HADS-D: Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale-Depression, SF 12 MCS: Short Form-12 Mental Component Score, SF-12 PSC: Short Form-12 Physical Component Score.*p<0.05, **p<0.001Disclosure of Interests:None declared