zoonotic infections
Recently Published Documents

Abstract Background Over the past decade, 70% of new and re-emerging infectious disease outbreaks in East Africa have originated from the Congo Basin where Rwanda is located. To respond to these increasing risks of disastrous outbreaks, the government began integrating One Health (OH) into its infectious disease response systems in 2011 to strengthen its preparedness and contain outbreaks. The strong performance of Rwanda in responding to the on-going COVID-19 pandemic makes it an excellent example to understand how the structure and principles of OH were applied during this unprecedented situation. Methods A rapid environmental scan of published and grey literature was conducted between August and December 2020, to assess Rwanda’s OH structure and its response to the COVID-19 pandemic. In total, 132 documents including official government documents, published research, newspaper articles, and policies were analysed using thematic analysis. Results Rwanda’s OH structure consists of multidisciplinary teams from sectors responsible for human, animal, and environmental health. The country has developed OH strategic plans and policies outlining its response to zoonotic infections, integrated OH into university curricula to develop a OH workforce, developed multidisciplinary rapid response teams, and created decentralized laboratories in the animal and human health sectors to strengthen surveillance. To address COVID-19, the country created a preparedness and response plan before its onset, and a multisectoral joint task force was set up to coordinate the response to the pandemic. By leveraging its OH structure, Rwanda was able to rapidly implement a OH-informed response to COVID-19. Conclusion Rwanda’s integration of OH into its response systems to infectious diseases and to COVID-19 demonstrates the importance of applying OH principles into the governance of infectious diseases at all levels. Rwanda exemplifies how preparedness and response to outbreaks and pandemics can be strengthened through multisectoral collaboration mechanisms. We do expect limitations in our findings due to the rapid nature of our environmental scan meant to inform the COVID-19 policy response and would encourage a full situational analysis of OH in Rwanda’s Coronavirus response.

Reverse-zoonotic infections of severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) from humans to wildlife species internationally raise concern over the emergence of new variants in animals. A better understanding of the transmission dynamics and pathogenesis in susceptible species will mitigate the risk to humans and wildlife occurring in Africa. Here we report infection of an exotic puma (July 2020) and three African lions (July 2021) in the same private zoo in Johannesburg, South Africa. One Health genomic surveillance identified transmission of a Delta variant from a zookeeper to the three lions, similar to those circulating in humans in South Africa. One lion developed pneumonia while the other cases had mild infection. Both the puma and lions remained positive for SARS-CoV-2 RNA for up to 7 weeks.

The human lineage entered a more carnivorous niche 2.6 mya. A range of evidence indicates this increased zoonotic pathogen pressure. This evidence includes increased zoonotic infections modern hunter-gatherers and bushmeat hunters relative to others living in the same environments, exceptionally low stomach pH compared to other primates, human-specific downregulation in ANTXR2 that would have protected against increased exposure to zoonotic anthrax, exceptional human immune responses to LPS compared to other primates, and other divergent immune genes. These all point to change, and likely intensification, in the disease environment of Homo compared to earlier hominins and other apes. At the same time, the brain, an organ in which inflammatory immune responses are highly constrained, begins to increase, eventually tripling in size. We propose that the combination of increased zoonotic pathogen pressure and the challenges of defending a large brain and body from pathogens across what would eventually become the longest lifespan of any mammal, selected for intensification of the self-medication strategies already in place in apes and other primates, resulting in a variety of plant-based pathogen defenses. In support, there is evidence of medicinal plant use by hominins in the middle Paleolithic, and all cultures today have sophisticated, plant-based medical systems, incorporate plant components high in secondary compounds (spices) into food, and regularly consume psychoactive substances that are harmful to helminths and other pathogens in the CNS and other tissues. The computational challenges of discovering effective plant-based treatments, and the economic challenges of benefiting from costly-to- acquire medical knowledge that would be more often useful to others than oneself, were selection pressures for increased cognitive abilities and unique exchange relationships in Homo. In the story of human evolution, which has long featured hunters, shamans and healers had an equal role to play.

The list of OIE identifies especially dangerous and other contagious diseases (83 — diseases of terrestrial animals, 48 — diseases of aquatic animals), including those common to humans and animals (zoonoses), including food more than 200. Veterinary science is tasked with ensuring the well-being of individual animal diseases: socially significant (brucellosis, tuberculosis, leptospirosis, etc.), as well as economically significant (African swine fever, bird flu, foot-and-mouth disease, etc.). It should be borne in mind that 80 % of pathogens that can be used for biological terrorism are also pathogens of zoonotic infections. In addition, the sources of causative agents of basic human food toxico-infections (salmonella, escherichia, yersenia, listeria, campylobacteria) are [4]. Foodstuffs occupy a special place among material goods, because they meet the vital need of people [6]. In the EU countries, zoonosis and food toxico infections are monitored. Monitoring results showed that the first and second most commonly reported zoonoses in humans were campylobacteriosis and salmonellosis. The EU trend for confirmed cases of people with these two diseases was stable (unchanged) during 2015–2019 years. The prevalence in the EU of salmonellous herd serovarpolozhitelnykh targeting salmonella has been stable since 2015 for breeding chickens, laying chickens, broilers and fattening turkeys, with fluctuations for breeding herds of turkeys. The results for salmonella obtained by the competent authorities for pig carcasses and poultry tested under national control programmes were more likely to be positive than those obtained from food industry operators. Escherichia coli infection (STEC), Siga toxin-producing, was the third most reported zoonosis in humans and increased from 2015 to 2019. Yersiniosis was the fourth most reported zoonosis in humans in 2019 with a stable trend in 2015–2019. Listeria rarely exceeded the EU food safety limit tested in ready-to-eat foods. A total of 5,175 food-borne outbreaks were reported. Salmonella remained the most identified causative agent, but the number of outbreaks caused by S. Enteritidis decreased. Norovirus contained in fish and fish products was a pair of agent/food that caused the largest number of outbreaks with convincing evidence. The report provides further updated information on bovine tuberculosis, Brucella, trichinella, echinococcus, Toxoplasma, rabies, West Nile virus, coccyella burnetia (Q-fever) and tularemia [3, 5, 7]. During diagnostic studies of imported cattle imported from Golandia, Germany, Switzerland, 7 subjects revealed positively responding animals to bluetang. The most serious situation regarding epizootic well-being, biological and economic security has developed in the African swine fever [4].

Salmonellosis is a common infection in poultry, which results in huge economic losses in the poultry industry. At the same time, Salmonella infections are a threat to public health, since contaminated poultry products can lead to zoonotic infections. Antibiotics as feed additives have proven to be an effective prophylactic option to control Salmonella infections, but due to resistance issues in humans and animals, the use of antimicrobials in food animals has been banned in Europe. Hence, there is an urgent need to look for alternative strategies that can protect poultry against Salmonella infections. One such alternative could be to strengthen the innate immune system in young chickens in order to prevent early life infections. This can be achieved by administration of immune modulating molecules that target innate immune cells, for example via feed, or by in-ovo applications. We aimed to review the innate immune system in the chicken intestine; the main site of Salmonella entrance, and its responsiveness to Salmonella infection. Identifying the most important players in the innate immune response in the intestine is a first step in designing targeted approaches for immune modulation.

The outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is a public health emergency that turns the year 2020–2021 into annus horribilis for millions of people across international boundaries. The interspecies transmission of this zoonotic virus and mutated variants are aided by exposure dynamics of infected aerosols, fomites and intermediate reservoirs. The spike in the first, second and third waves of coronavirus confirms that herd immunity is not yet reached and everyone including livestock is still vulnerable to the infection. Of serious concern are the communitarian nature of agrarians in the livestock sector, aerogenous spread of the virus and attendant cytocidal effect in permissive cells following activation of pathogen recognition receptors, replication cycles, virulent mutations, seasonal spike in infection rates, flurry of reinfections and excess mortalities that can affect animal welfare and food security. As the capacity to either resist or be susceptible to infection is influenced by numerous factors, identifying coronavirus-associated variants and correlating exposure dynamics with viral aerosols, spirometry indices, comorbidities, susceptible blood types, cellular miRNA binding sites and multisystem inflammatory syndrome remains a challenge where the lethal zoonotic infections are prevalent in the livestock industry, being the hub of dairy, fur, meat and egg production. This review provides insights into the complexity of the disease burden and recommends precision smart-farming models for upscaling biosecurity measures and adoption of digitalised technologies (robotic drones) powered by multiparametric sensors and radio modem systems for real-time tracking of infectious strains in the agro-environment and managing the transition into the new-normal realities in the livestock industry.

Zoonotic infections of humans with influenza A viruses (IAVs) from animal reservoirs can result in severe disease in individuals and, in rare cases, lead to pandemic outbreaks; this is exemplified by numerous cases of human infection with avian IAVs (AIVs) and the 2009 swine influenza pandemic. In fact, zoonotic transmissions are strongly facilitated by manmade reservoirs that were created through the intensification and industrialization of livestock farming. This can be witnessed by the repeated introduction of IAVs from natural reservoirs of aquatic wild bird metapopulations into swine and poultry, and the accompanied emergence of partially- or fully-adapted human pathogenic viruses. On the other side, human adapted IAV have been (and still are) introduced into livestock by reverse zoonotic transmission. This link to manmade reservoirs was also observed before the 20th century, when horses seemed to have been an important reservoir for IAVs but lost relevance when the populations declined due to increasing industrialization. Therefore, to reduce zoonotic events, it is important to control the spread of IAV within these animal reservoirs, for example with efficient vaccination strategies, but also to critically surveil the different manmade reservoirs to evaluate the emergence of new IAV strains with pandemic potential.

Abstract Background Refugees in Malaysia, who are afflicted by poverty, conflict and poor health, are vulnerable to a range of zoonotic infections in the deprived environmental and social conditions under which they live. Exposure to infections such as leptospirosis, for which rodents are primary hosts, is of particular concern. Methods A wellness program was conducted to determine the presence of antibodies against Leptospira (seroprevalence) in 11 refugee community schools and centers in the Klang Valley, Malaysia. A total of 433 samples were assessed for IgG and IgM antibodies against Leptospira, using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA). Results Overall Leptospira seroprevalence was 24.7%, with 3.0% being seropositive for anti-Leptospira IgG and 21.7% for anti-Leptospira IgM. Factors significantly associated with overall Leptospira seroprevalence included: age, ethnicity, pet ownership, knowledge of disease and awareness of disease fatality. For IgM seroprevalence, significant risk factors included sex, ethnicity, eating habits with hands, pet ownership, the presence of rats, walking in bare feet and water recreation visits. Conclusions These findings highlight the need for improvements in health and well-being among the refugee community through disease awareness programs and provision of healthy behavior programs, particularly in hygiene and sanitation through community engagement activities.

Abstract Background Coxiella burnetii and Brucella spp. are zoonotic bacterial pathogens responsible for Q fever and Brucellosis, respectively. Both pathogens have a global distribution and Brucellosis is the most common zoonosis in the world. However, the CDC reports only 80-120 cases of human brucellosis and ~150 cases of acute Q fever annually. The diagnosis of these infections can be limited by: (1) their difficulty to culture; (2) the insensitivity and nonspecificity of serology; (3) the clinical overlap with other infections; and (4) the unreliability of epidemiological exposure history for these zoonoses. Unbiased microbial cell free DNA (mcfDNA) next-generation sequencing (NGS) offers a potential solution to overcome these limitations. Methods The Karius TestTM (KT) developed and validated in Karius’s CLIA certified/CAP accredited lab in Redwood City, CA detects mcfDNA in plasma. After mcfDNA is extracted and NGS performed, human reads are removed, and remaining sequences are aligned to a curated database of > 1500 organisms. McfDNA from organisms present above a statistical threshold are reported and quantified in molecules/µL (MPM). KT detections of Coxiella and Brucella were reviewed from August 2017 - present; clinical information was obtained with test requisition or consultation upon result reporting. Results KT detected 8 cases of Coxiella burnetii (1735 MPM +/- 3000) and 5 cases of Brucella melitensis (avg 296 MPM +/- 223) (Table 1), representing approximately 1-2% of all detections in the US during this period. All of the Coxiella detections were in adults (100% male) with 5 cases of fever of unknown origin, 2 cases of culture-negative endocarditis and one case of endovascular graft infection. Brucella detections occurred in 3 adults and 2 children (60% male), 3 with exposure to unpasteurized dairy and included 3 cases of spine infection (2 vertebral osteomyelitis, 1 epidural abscess). Conclusion Open-ended, plasma-based mcfDNA NGS provides a rapid, non-invasive test to diagnose diverse clinical manifestations of zoonotic infections such as Q fever and Brucellosis against competing broad differential diagnoses. Furthermore, these cases highlight the potential of the KT to diagnose infections caused by fastidious/unculturable pathogens with cryptic clinical presentations. Disclosures Nicholas R. Degner, MD, MPH, MS, Karius Inc. (Employee, Shareholder) Ricardo Castillo-Galvan, MD MPH, Karius Inc. (Consultant) Jose Alexander, MD, D(ABMM), FCCM, CIC, SM, MB(ASCP), BCMAS, Karius (Employee) Aparna Arun, MD, Karius (Employee) Ann Macintyre, DO, Karius, Inc. (Employee) Bradley Perkins, MD, Karius, Inc. (Employee) Asim A. Ahmed, MD, Karius, Inc. (Employee) Matthew Smollin, PharmD, Karius, Inc. (Employee)