early mobilization
Recently Published Documents

Introduction: Monteggia fracture dislocations are rare injuries (<5%) where missed treatment results into deformity and dysfunction of forearm and hand. For the better functional result early diagnosis, accurate reduction of radial head and rigid fixation of ulna and immobilization during post-operative period for ligamentous healing around radius is vital. So operative treatment has been the primary method of treatment to prevent deformity and disability in monteggia fracture dislocation. Aims: The aim of this study was to evaluate the time taken to unite fractures, complications encountered and assess the functional outcome on the basis of K-wire fixation in monteggia fracture dislocation in children. Methods: A cross-sectional observational study was conducted in Nepalgunj Medical College and Teaching Hospital, Kohalpur, Banke with monteggia fracture dislocation in children. Results: Thirty-two monteggia fracture dislocation in children between six to 14 years of age were treated with intramedullary K-wires after reduction of radial head. Seven cases had open reduction, and five needed trans-capitellar K-wire supplementation. Mean union time was 8.44±1.94 weeks ranging from seven to 12 weeks. The functional outcome on the basis of Anderson’s scoring system was excellent in 25(78.1%), good in three and optimal in four cases. Conclusion: Monteggia fracture dislocation is better treated early and early mobilization of elbow joint is needed for better functional results.

Background: Olecranon process is a large, curved eminence comprising of the proximal and posterior part of the ulna. It lies subcutaneously which makes it more vulnerable to injury. Due to intra-articular extension of fractures, anatomical reduction and early mobilization should be achieved in every case and usually managed surgically. Aims and Objectives: To access the results of reconstruction plate in fracture olecranon.Materials &Methods: This was a prospective study consisted of 25 cases of olecranon fractures which were managed by open reduction and internal fixation using 3.5mm reconstruction plate. Patients were followed up every month till 6 months. At each follow up visit clinical and radiological parameters were assessed: Final assessment was done at 6 months using the Mayo Elbow Performance Score.Result: According to the AO classification, Type A-1 – 7 cases, A-3 – 1case, B-1 – 13 cases, B-3 – 1 case, C-1 – 1 case, C-2 – 1 case, C-3 – 1 case. An adequate reduction was maintained in all fractured olecranon until union. Average radiological union time was 12 weeks in 72% cases, 15 weeks in 16% cases, 18 weeks in 8% cases and > 18 weeks in 4% cases. The results were graded as per the criteria laid by Rogers et al as excellent in 84% cases, good in 12% and unsatisfactory in 4% cases. 2 cases developed superficial infection and 1 deep infection and 1 delayed union.Conclusion: Open reduction and internal fixation of fracture of olecranon with 3.5mm reconstruction plate is based on sound biomechanical principle with a good functional outcome and a low incidence of complications.

Aim: To explore the knowledge and attitudes of newly graduated registered nurses, who have undergone standardized training in the intensive care unit, about the early mobilization of mechanically ventilated patients and identify perceived barriers to the application of early mobilization.Background: Early mobilization of mechanically ventilated patients has been gradually gaining attention, and its safety and effectiveness have also been verified. Nurses in intensive care units are the implementers of early mobilization, and the quality of their care is closely related to patient prognosis. However, the knowledge and attitude of newly graduated registered nurses undergoing standardized training, in intensive care units, on the early mobilization of mechanically ventilated patients and the obstacles they face in clinical implementation are still unclear.Methods: This qualitative study utilized the phenomenological method to explore the experiences of 15 newly graduated registered nurses undergoing standardized training in intensive care units in a 3rd hospital in Shanghai, China. Semi-structured face-to-face interviews were conducted in June 2020. The Colaizzi seven-step framework was used for data analysis.Findings: A total of 15 new nurses comprised the final sample after data saturation. Three main themes emerged from the analysis and seven subthemes: perceived importance, low implementation rate, and perceived barriers.Conclusions: Newly graduated registered nurses undergoing standardized training in intensive care units have a high level of awareness of the importance of early mobilization of mechanically ventilated patients and are willing to implement it. However, there is a lack of relevant knowledge and other obstacles that restrict clinical implementation. Early mobilization should be included in the standardized training of new nurses in intensive care units.

Abstract Early mobilization with mechanically ventilated patients has received significant attention within recent literature, however limited research has focused specifically on the burn population. The purpose of this single center, retrospective analysis was to review the use of a burn critical care mobility algorithm, to determine safety and feasibility of a burn vented mobility program, share limitations preventing mobility progression at our facility, and discuss unique challenges to vented mobility with intubated burn patients. A retrospective review was completed for all intubated burn center admissions between January 2015 to December 2019. Burn Therapy notes were then reviewed for data collection, during the intubation period, using stages of the mobility algorithm. In 5 years following initial implementation, the vented mobility algorithm was utilized on 127 patients with an average total body surface area of 22.8%. No adverse events occurred. Stage 1 (Range of motion) was completed with 100% of patients (n=127). Chair mode of bed, stage 2a, was utilized in 39.4%(n=50) of patients, while 15.8% (n=20) of patients were dependently transferred to the cardiac chair in stage 2b. Stage 3 (sitting on the edge-of-bed) was completed with 25% (n=32) of patients, with 11% (n=14) progressing to stage 5 (standing), and 3.9% (n=5) actively transferring to a chair. In 5 years, only 4.7% (n=6) reached stage 6 (ambulation). The most common treatment limitations were medical complications (33%) and line placement (21%). Early mobilization during mechanical ventilation is safe and feasible within the burn population, despite challenges including airway stability, sedation, and line limitations.

Treatment of acetabular fractures is challenging and risky, especially when surgery is performed. Yet, stability and congruity of the hip joint need to be achieved to ensure early mobilization, painlessness, and good function. Therefore, coming up with an accurate decision, whether surgical treatment is indicated or not, is the key to successful therapy. Data from the German pelvic Trauma Registry (n  = 4213) was evaluated retrospectively, especially regarding predictors for surgery. Furthermore, a logistic regression model with surgical treatment as the dependent variable was established. In total, 25.8% of all registered patients suffered from an acetabular fracture and 61.9% of them underwent surgery. The fracture classification is important for the indication of surgical therapy. Anterior wall fractures were treated surgically in 10.2%, and posterior column plus posterior wall fractures were operated on in 90.2%. Also, larger fracture gaps were treated surgically more often than fractures with smaller gaps (>3 mm 84.4%, <1 mm 20%). In total, 51.4% of women and 66.0% of men underwent surgery. Apart from the injury severity score (ISS), factors that characterize the overall picture of the injury were of no importance for the indication of a surgical therapy (isolated pelvic fracture: 62.0%, polytrauma: 58.8%). The most frequent reason for non-operative treatment was ‘minimal displacement’ in 42.2%. Besides fracture classification and fracture characteristics, no factors characterizing the overall injury, except for the ISS, and unexpectedly gender, are important for making a treatment decision. Further studies are needed to determine the relevance of these factors, and whether they should be used for the decision-making process, in particular surgeons with less experience in pelvic surgery, can orient themselves to.

To formulate the specific guidelines for the recommendation of thoracolumbar fracture regarding surgical techniques and nonfusion surgery. WFNS (World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies) Spine Committee organized 2 consensus meeting. For nonfusion surgery and thoracolumbar fracture, a systematic literature search in PubMed and Google Scholar database was done from 2010 to 2020. The search was further refined by excluding the articles which were duplicate, not in English or were based on animal or cadaveric subjects. After thorough shortlisting, only 50 articles were selected for full review in this consensus meeting. To generate a consensus, the levels of agreement or disagreement on each item were voted independently in a blind fashion through a Likert-type scale from 1 to 5. The consensus was achieved when the sum for disagreement or agreement was ≥ 66%. Each consensus point was clearly defined with evidence strength, recommendation grade, and consensus level provided. A magnitude of prospective papers were analyzed to formulate consensus on various surgical techniques that can be employed to address different types of thoracolumbar fractures. Surgical treatment of thoracolumbar fractures can be a better option over the nonoperative approach, especially for those who cannot tolerate months in an orthosis or cast, such as those with multiple extremity injuries, skin lesions, obesity, and so forth. It generally allows early mobilization, less hospital stay, reduced pulmonary complications, and better correction of sagittal balance. Current available literature fails to demonstrate any statistically significant benefit of fusion surgery over nonfusion in thoracolumbar fractures.

Introduction: Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is a rare neoplasm representing 80% of gastrointestinal neoplasms. Laparoscopic resection is only recommended for GIST less than 2 cm and 5 cm for laparoscopic wedge resection. Thus, a large GIST is recommended to complete resection through laparotomy. A large GIST of the gastric fundus can be found in patients, which coincides with an upper right abdominal quadrant pain caused by cholecystolithiasis. A suggested laparotomy for tumor resection and cholecystectomy may result in poor recovery in the postoperative period. Therefore, one approach surgery with minimally invasive laparoscopic partial gastrectomy using Endoflex stapler and cholecystectomy was performed to achieve the optimal outcome.Case Presentation: A 43-year-old male had a major complaint of hematemesis and melena for one month and colicky pain in the right upper quadrant of the abdomen with increased intensity in the last two months. Contrast-enhanced abdominal MSCT revealed a solid 4.6 x 4 x 5.6 cm exophytic mass on the gastric fundus, added with 0.5 cm gall bladder stone. Laparoscopic partial gastrectomy and cholecystectomy were performed in a single minimal invasive surgical procedure. The post-operative period was uneventful. The patient experienced minimum pain, early mobilization, and better diet tolerance. He was discharged on day four after the surgery. Besides, the histopathologic result revealed a malignant mesenchymal tumor according to GIST with a tumor-free margin of resection.Conclusions: Single approach surgery with minimal laparoscopic partial gastrectomy and cholecystectomy has provided optimal outcomes for patients with large GIST and cholecystolithiasis.

The purpose of the study was to compare the impact of approaches to early mobilization of cardiac surgery patients on the duration of hospitalization. Materials and methods. Early mobilization of patients after cardiac surgery and study of its effectiveness is an important issue of physical therapy. The beginning of the development of cardiac surgery was characterized by the fact that patients after surgery were in the intensive care unit on a bed rest for several days to improve recovery and prevent complications. The benefits of early mobilization were later recognized, and patient verticalization began earlier. The study involved 90 patients (over 18 years old). Patients were divided into two groups. The first group of mobilization (GM1, n = 49) included patients who underwent surgery on Monday or Tuesday, performed standing and if possible walking on the spot on the first postoperative day with a physical therapist. The second group of mobilization (GM2, n = 41) included patients who underwent surgery on Friday, were mobilized to sit in bed on the first postoperative day; performed standing and walking on the spot on the second or third postoperative day with the participation of medical staff. In addition, other early mobilization points (chamber walking and corridor walking) were performed statistically later in GM2. Patients did not differ in other features of physical therapy. All patients were told during the preoperative consultation with a physical therapist that if they were operated on Friday, they would perform mobilization and therapeutic exercises with medical staff on weekends. Patient case data (age, sex, study protocols and operations) were studied. Results and discussion. Among GM1 patients, the part of men was 69.39%, and in the GM2 group – 78.05% (χ² = 0.856; p = 0.355). Groups of patients did not have significant differences in age, anatropometric parameters, key results of preoperative studies, characteristics of surgical interventions. The study did not establish the effect of more progressive early mobilization performed in GM1 on the length of stay in the postoperative ward (7 (6; 8) nights versus 7 (5; 8) nights; p=0.428) and the total duration of postoperative hospitalization (9 (8; 10) nights against 10 (7; 11) nights; p=0.733). Statistically better indicators of the GM1 group were obtained in the number of nights spent in intensive care (all patients – two nights, except 3 patients in GM1 and 11 in GM2 – three nights; p=0.007), but this advantage should be considered taking into account the impact of patient logistics, namely longer stay in intensive care on weekends. Conclusion. The data confirmed the same effectiveness of approaches to early mobilization of cardiac surgery patients in terms of duration of postoperative hospitalization