hook wire
Recently Published Documents

BackgroundPrecise preoperative localization is of great importance to improve the success rate and reduce the operation time of VATS surgery. This study aimed to assess the efficacy, safety, patient perception between CT-guided indocyanine green (ICG) preoperative localization of lung nodule and hook-wire localization.Methods65 patients with 85 clinically suspicious pulmonary nodules underwent ICG preoperative localization in this study, and 92 patients with 95 nodules localized by conventional hook-wire served as controls. Both hook-wire localization and ICG injection were performed under CT guidance. Successful targeting rate, success rate in the operative field, incidence rate of complications and respiratory pain score were recorded and compared.ResultsThe successful targeting rate for both groups is 100%, however, due to hook-wire dislodgement, the success rate in the VATS operation field of the hook-wire group (95.6%) is lower than that of the ICG group (100%), with no significant difference(p=0.056). The overall complication rate of the hook-wire group (37.0%) is significantly higher than the ICG group (35.4%) (p=0.038). The mean respiratory pain score of the hook-wire group is 3.70 ± 1.25, which is significantly higher than that of the ICG group (2.85 ± 1.05) (p<0.001).ConclusionsICG composed with contrast mixture are superior to the conventional hook-wire preoperative lung nodule localization procedure, with a lower complication rate, lower pain score, and relatively higher success rate. ICG is a promising alternative method for pulmonary nodule preoperative localization.

Abstract Objectives: To retrospectively analyse the potential influencing factors of CT-guided hook wire localization failure prior to thoracoscopic resection surgery of ground glass nodules (GGNs), and determine the main risk elements for localization failure.Methods: In all, 372 patients were included in this study, with 21 patients showing localization failure. The related parameters of patients, GGNs, and localization were analysed through univariate and multiple logistic regression analysis to determine the risk factors of localization failure.Results: Univariate logistic regression analysis indicated that trans-fissure (odds ratio [OR]: 4.896, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.489–13.939); trans-emphysema (OR: 3.538, 95%CI: 1.343–8.827); localization time (OR: 0.956, 95%CI: 0.898–1.019); multi-nodule localization (OR: 2.597, 95%CI: 1.050–6.361); and pneumothorax (OR: 10.326, 95%CI: 3.414–44.684) were risk factors for localization failure, and the p-values of these factors were <0.05. However, according to the results of multivariate analysis, pneumothorax (OR: 5.998, 95%CI: 1.680–28.342) was an exclusive risk factor for the failure of preoperative localization of GGNs.Conclusion: CT-guided hook wire localization of GGNs prior to thoracoscopic surgery is often known to fail; however, the incidence is low. Pneumothorax is an independent risk factor for failure in the localization process.

Introduction: Totally endophytic renal masses may be invisible during laparoscopic partial nephrectomy, posing challenge to surgeons regarding tumor’s identification and resection. Case presentation: A 22-year-old male was incidentally diagnosed with a completely endophytic, cT1a renal mass. Percutaneous Computed Tomography-guided insertion of a hook-wire was performed prior to laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. The hook-wire anchored centrally into the tumor and its extra-renal part was easily identified intraoperatively, contributing to tumor’s identification and surgical excision. Total operative time was 185 min, warm ischemia time was 21.5 min, tumor excision time was 10 min, and total renorraphy time was 31 min. No complications were encountered perioperatively. The patient was discharged on the fourth postoperative day. Histology revealed a pT1a, clear-cell renal cell carcinoma, with negative surgical margins. Conclusions: Our first experience indicates that hook-wire guided excision of a completely endophytic renal mass during laparoscopic partial nephrectomy is feasible, safe, and cost-effective.

Systemic arterial air embolism (SAAE) is a rare but serious complication of CT-guided hook wire localization of pulmonary nodule usually with catastrophic and poor outcome. Hook wire needle localization is done pre-operatively by placing wire around or into the pulmonary nodule to provide the thoracic surgeon accurate location guidance of the target nodule for Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery (VATS) wedge resection with safety margins. Physicians should be aware of this possible complication during the procedure in order to rescue the patient promptly as it requires rapid diagnosis and management. We describe a 55-year-old male who underwent a CT-guided hook wire needle localization of left upper lobe lung cancer and left lower lobe pulmonary nodule prior to planned VATS wedge resection who developed altered mental status and bilateral lower extremities paralysis after wire placement was completed. His CT head demonstrated small air embolism in the left occipital area, confirming the diagnosis of cerebral air embolism and follow up CT and MRI of the head revealed multiple areas of brain infarction. In addition, he was diagnosed with anterior spinal cord syndrome (ACS), most likely due to anterior spinal artery ischemia from micro air embolism on the basis of clinical findings but with negative ischemic changes on MRI of the spinal cord. His mental status recovered but he remained paraplegic and transferred to inpatient rehabilitation service.

Objective: To develop and validate a CT-based nomogram to predict the occurrence of loculated pneumothorax due to hook wire placement. Methods: Patients (n = 177) were divided into pneumothorax (n = 72) and non-pneumothorax (n = 105) groups. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was applied to build a clinical prediction model using significant predictors identified by univariate analysis of imaging features and clinical factors. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) was applied to evaluate the discrimination of the nomogram, which was calibrated using calibration curve. Results: Based on the results of multivariable regression analysis, transfissure approach [odds ratio (OR): 757.94; 95% confidence interval CI (21.20–27099.30) p < 0.0001], transemphysema [OR: 116.73; 95% CI (12.34–1104.04) p < 0.0001], localization of multiple nodules [OR: 8.04; 95% CI (2.09–30.89) p = 0.002], and depth of nodule [OR: 0.77; 95% CI (0.71–0.85) p < 0.0001] were independent risk factors for pneumothorax and were included in the predictive model (p < 0.05). The area under the ROC curve value for the nomogram was 0.95 [95% CI (0.92–0.98)] and the calibration curve indicated good consistency between risk predicted using the model and actual risk. Conclusion: A CT-based nomogram combining imaging features and clinical factors can predict the probability of pneumothorax before localization of ground-glass nodules. The nomogram is a decision-making tool to prevent pneumothorax and determine whether to proceed with further treatment. Advances in knowledge: A nomogram composed of transfissure, transemphysema, multiple nodule localization, and depth of nodule has been developed to predict the probability of pneumothorax before localization of GGNs.