Naturalness Versus Markedness
Naturalness Versus Markedness
Naturalness Versus Markedness
te of naturalness, sounds are more difficult, less frequently occurring Related to development, natural sounds are acquired earlier by children and marked sounds tend to be acquired later Sound cognates are typically described as marked versus unmarked
Markedness Principles Voiceless obstruents are more natural than voiced obstruents Obstruents are more natural than sonorants Stops are more natural than fricatives Fricatives are more natural than affricates Low front vowels are the most natural vowels Close-tense vowels are more natural than open-lax vowels Anterior consonants are more natural than nonanterior consonants
Markedness and Implied Universals Fricatives imply stops Voiced stops imply voiceless stops Thus, whenever a more marked aspect is seen in the language, the unmarked cognate is assumed This idea has also been applied to childrens phonological systems
Natural Phonology Proposed by Stampe to describe phonological development Natural phonology hypothesizes that patterns of speech are governed by an innate, universal set of phonological processes Phonological Process - a pattern of substitution that applies to a class of sounds which are difficult for an individual All children use the phonological processes as they learn the phonological rules of their language and as their motor system develops Development and Natural Phonology Childs innate phonology is continuously revised toward the adult system, passive process 3 mechanisms: (1) limitation - differences in childs system compared to adult system become limited to specific sounds or sequences (2) ordering - substitutions that appear random or unordered become ordered (3) suppression - elimination of childs phonological processes to fit adult language Phonological Processes Disordered child is not progressing with suppression of processes as expected Phonological processes are useful clinically used to describe the patterns of errors do not need to agree with the original idea that phonological processes explain acquisition and disorder Natural Processes - phonological processes that occur crosslinguistically
Natural Processes Assimilatory processes Described in BBF as similar to co-articulation processes Nonassimilatory processes Omission and substitution processes Epenthesis insertion of a sound, usually in a cluster (e.g., blue is /blu/) Metathesis reversal of sounds (e.g., ask is /Qks/)
Linear versus Nonlinear Phonologies emphasis on serial sequence of segments segments = bundles of features all sound segments have equal value phonological rules apply only at the level of the segment and distinctive features propose a tiered or hierarchical arrangement segments = distinctive features that are ordered some features dominate other features phonological rules are affected by the sentence, word, stress, syllable, segment, and features
Nonlinear Phonologies Autosegmental Phonology a feature can operate independently, although within the hierarchical structure Metrical Phonology specifically deals with the dimension of stress Feature Geometry focused on the ordering of features, explain spreading and deletion processes