Worked Example Extract Columns PDF

134
Columns
General
he ca|cu|at|ons |n th|s sect|on |||ustrate
S! Les|gn o a non-s|ender edge co|umn us|ng hand ca|cu|at|on
S2 Les|gn o a per|meter co|umn us|ng |terat|on o equat|ons to determ|ne re|norcement
requ|rements
S3 Les|gn o an |nterna| co|umn w|th h|gh ax|a| |oad
S4 Les|gn o a s|ender co|umn requ|r|ng a two-hour ure res|stance
ln genera|, ax|a| |oads and urst order moments are assumed to |e ava||a||e he des|gns cons|der
s|enderness |n order to determ|ne des|gn moments, F
ld
he co|umns are des|gned and chec|ed
or ||ax|a| |end|ng he eects o a||ow|ng or |mperect|ons are |||ustrated
A genera| method o des|gn|ng co|umns |s as o||ows ln pract|ce, severa| o these steps may |e
com||ned
Leterm|ne des|gn ||e N EC0 & NA Table NA 2.1
Assess act|ons on the co|umn N EC1 (10 parts) & UK NAs
Leterm|ne wh|ch com||nat|ons o act|ons app|y N EC0 & NA Tables NA A1.1
& NA A1.2(B)
Assess dura||||ty requ|rements and determ|ne concrete N
strength
BS 85001
Chec| cover requ|rements or appropr|ate |re N
res|stance per|od
Approved Document B,
EC212
Leterm|ne cover or |re, dura||||ty and |ond N Cl. 4.4.1
Ana|yse structure or cr|t|ca| com||nat|on moments N
and ax|a| orces
Section 5
Chec| s|enderness and determ|ne des|gn moments N Section 5.8
Leterm|ne area o re|norcement requ|red N Section 6.1
Chec| spac|ng o |ars and ||n|s N Sections 8 & 9
.
.')
Co|umns
135
A 300 mm square column on the edge of a at slab structure
supports an axial load of 1620 kN and rst order moments of
38.5 kNm top and 38.5 kNm bottom in one direction only
. The
concrete is grade C30/37, f
ck
f = 30 MPa and cover, c
nom
, = 25 mm.
The 250 mm thick at slabs are at 4000 mm vertical centres.
N
Ed
= 1620 kN
38.5 kNm
38.5 kNm
Figure 5.1 Forces in edge column
5.1.1 Check slenderness, l
Effective length
, l
0
= factor l Cl. 5.8.3.2
where
factor = from Table C16, condition 2 each end Table C16, Table C16,
= 0.85 PD 6687: 2.10
l = clear height = 3750 mm l
= l
0
= 0.85 3750 = 3187 mm
Slenderness l = l
0
/i Exp. (5.14)
For examples of load take-downs and 1st order moment analysis see Section
5.3.2
Effective lengths are covered in Eurocode 2 Cl. 5.8.3.2 and Exp. (5.15). The
effective length of most columns will be l /2< l
0
l < l (see Eurocode 2 Figure 5.7f). l
PD 6687
[6]
Cl. 2.10 suggests that using the procedure outlined in Eurocode 2
(5.8.3.2(3) and 5.8.3.2(5)) leads to similar effective lengths to those tabulated
in BS 8110
[7]
and reproduced in Table 5.1 of Concise Eurocode 2
[5]
and in this
publication as Table C16. For simplicity, tabular values are used in this example.
However, experience suggests that these tabulated values are conservative.
Fig. 5.7
PD 6687
[6]
:
Cl. 2.10
Cl. 5.8.3.2(3)
5.8.3.2(5)
Table C16 Table C16
.'* Edge column
he |ntent|on o th|s ca|cu|at|on |s to show a typ|ca| hand ca|cu|at|on that ma|es reerence
to des|gn charts
lro|ect deta||s
Ca|cu|ated |y chg o| no CCIP 041
Chec|ed |y web Sheet no 1
C||ent TCC Late Oct 09
Edge column
136
where
i = radius of gyration
= h/12
0.5
for rectangular sections
l = 3187 3.46/300 = 36.8
5.1.2 Limiting slenderness, l
lim
l
lim
= 20 ABC/n
0.5
Exp. (5.13N)
where
A = 0.7 (default) Cl. 5.8.3.1(1)
B = 1.1 (default)
C = 1.7 r
m
= 1.7 M
01
/M
02
= 1.7 38.5/(38.5) = 2.7
n = N
Ed
/A
c
f
cd
= 1620 10
3
/(300
2
0.85 30/1.5)
= 1.06
l
lim
= 20 ABC/n
0.5
= 20 0.7 1.1 2.7/1.06
0.5
In this example l
lim
= 40.4 i.e. > 36.8 = Column not slender
5.1.3 Design moments
M
Ed
= max[M
02
; M
0Ed
+ M
2
; M
01
+ 0.5M
2
] Cl. 5.8.8.2(1)
where
M
02
= M + e
i
N
Ed
e
0
N
Ed
Cl. 5.8.8.2, 6.1.4
where
M = 38.5 kNm
e
i
= l
0
/400
e
0
= max[h/30; 20] = max[300/30; 20] = 20 mm
Cl. 5.2.7, 5.2.9
Cl. 6.1.4
M
02
= 38.5 + 1620 3.187/400 0.02 1620
= 38.5 + 12.9 32.4 kNm
= 51.4 kNm
M
0Ed
= 0.6M
02
+ 0.4M
01
0.4M
02
= 0.6 51.4 + 0.4 (38.5 + 12.9) 0.4 51.4
= 20.6 20.6
= 20.6
M
2
= 0 (column is not slender)
M
01
= M
02
= max[M
02
; M
0Ed
+ M
2
; M
01
+ 0.5M
2
] = 51.4 kNm = M
Ed
= 51.4 kNm
5.1.4 Design using charts (see Appendix C)
d
2
= c
nom
+ link + f/2 = 25 + 8 + 16 = 49
d
2
/h = 49/300 = 0.163
= interpolating between d
2
/h = 0.15 and 0.20 Figs. C5c), C5d)
for
N
Ed
/bhf
ck
= 1620 10
3
/(300
2
30) = 0.60
137
S! ldge co|umn
M
Ed
/bh
2
f
ck
= 51.4 10
6
/(300
3
30) = 0.063
A
s
f
yk
/bhf
ck
= 0.24
A
s
= 0.24 300
2
30/500 = 1296 mm
2
Try 4 no. H25 (1964 mm
2
)
5.1.5 Check for biaxial bending
l
y
/l
z
1.0 Cl. 5.8.9
i.e. l
y
/l
z
2.0 = OK but check Exp. (5.38b) Exp. (5.38a)
As a worst case M
Edy
may coexist with e
0
N
Ed
about the orthogonal axis: Cl. 6.1(4)
e
y
/h
eq

=
(M
Edz
/N
Ed
)/h
=
M
Edz
e
z
/b
eq
(M
Edy
/N
Ed
)/b M
Edy
Exp. (5.38b)
Imperfections need to be taken into account in one direction only.
= As a worst case for biaxial bending
Cl. 5.8.9(2)
M
Edz
= M + 0 = 38.5 kNm
M
Edy
= e
0
N
Ed
= 32.4 kNm
M
Edz

=
38.5
= 1.19 i.e. > 0.2 and < 5.0
M
Edy
32.4
Exp. (5.38b)
= Biaxial check required Cl. 5.8.9(4)
Check whether
(M
Edz
/M
Rdz
)
a
+ (M
Edy
/M
Rdy
)
a
1.0 Exp. (5.39)
where
M
Edz
= 38.5 kNm
M
Edy
= 32.4 kNm
M
Rdz
= M
Rdy
Figs. C5c), C5d)
To determine M
Rdz
, nd M
Ed
/bh
2
f
ck
(and therefore
moment capacity) by interpolating between d
2
/h = 0.15
(Figure C5c) and 0.20 (Figure C5d) for the proposed
arrangement and co-existent axial load.
Assuming 4 no. H25,
A
s
f
yk
/bhf
ck
= 1964 500/(300
2
30) = 0.36
Interpolating for N
Ed
/bhf
ck
= 0.6,
M
Ed
/bh
2
f
ck
= 0.094
= M
Rdz
= M
Rdy
= 0.094 300
3
30 = 76.1 kNm
a is dependent on N
Ed
/N
Rd
where
N
Ed
= 1620 kN as before
Cl. 5.8.9(4),
Notes to Exp.
(5.39)

Worked Example Extract Columns PDF

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Worked Example Extract Columns PDF

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Worked Example Extract Columns PDF

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

134

You might also like