BFL Case Study
BFL Case Study
BFL Case Study
www.emeraldinsight.com/0025-1747.htm
MD
46,10 Internationalisation of Bharat
Forge Limited: a case study
Rajesh K. Pillania
1544 Management Development Institute, Sukhrali, Gurgaon, India and
Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
Abstract
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to follow the internationalisation of an Indian company,
Bharat Forge Limited. It studies how a small company from India becomes one of the leading players
in the global forging industry.
Design/methodology/approach – This is a case study approach for studying the process of
internationalisation in one particular firm.
Findings – Bharat Forge Limited has followed the traditional stages model of internationalisation. It
started global foray with exports and continued with that for more than three decades before going for
acquisitions way. The company has gone for related-diversified using its strengths in technology to
diversify its products, markets and customers over the years and today has a global footprints in
terms of sales and manufacturing locations.
Practical implications – It shows the way for companies even small ones and from developing
countries, that how one can go for internationalisation and emerge as a leading global player.
Originality/value – India is one of the fastest emerging markets and there is growing interests in
Indian economy and Indian firms. But there are few case studies on internationalisation of Indian firms
and this study tries to fill that gap. Bharat Forge Limited is an Indian multinational company and has
become a leading player in global forging industry.
Keywords International business, Emerging markets, Exports, Globalization, India
Paper type Case study
1545
Industry performance
The Indian forging industry has emerged as a major contributor to the manufacturing
sector of the country in recent past. The Indian forging industry has been growing at a
compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 29 percent from 2003 onwards, and on an
average exports contribute around 10-15 percent of the industry’s production as shown
in Table II. The capacity of the industry is estimated to be around 1.5 million tones and
the industry currently operates around 70 percent capacity utilization producing
around 1.0-1.2 million tones of forgings.
Riding on outsourcing and technological developments, India exported forgings
worth US$ 472 million in 2007-2008. The industry’s major markets are USA, Europe
and China. However, only about 30-35 manufacturing units are currently contributing
to exports directly. The industry is one of the leading industries, which have gone for
foreign acquisitions in Europe and USA because the auto ancillary industry in these
countries has been collapsing (AIFI, 2008).
Industry structure
The Indian forging industry is highly fragmented consisting of around 400 units and
out of those only 9-10 are large units. Table III gives comparative performance of seven
major forging companies. The SMEs form the backbone of the industry. The organized
sector accounts for about 65-70 percent of the total forging production in the country,
while unorganised players (who are mainly small and tiny units) cater mainly to job
work and the replacement market or tier 3 or tier 4 component manufacturers. The
unorganised sector caters mainly into Open Die Forging segment having lower capital
costs whereas the organized sector dominates the Closed Die Forging segment. Closed
Die Forging contributes 70 percent, Open Die Forging Die contributes 15 percent and
Precision Die Forging contributes rest 15 percent to total forgoing production in the
country. It has investment of US $ 700 million and provides employment to 200,000
directly and indirectly (AIFI, 2008). Historically the industry was labour intensive but
now it is becoming more capital intensive with opening up of the economy and
globalisation.
Product range
Indian forging industry makes a wide range of products, each being a diverse market
structure and technology requirement, meeting not only the needs of the country but
also supplying to global markets. The automotive industry is the main customer for
forgings. However, the industry’s efforts in upgrading technologies and diversifying
product range have enabled it to expand its base of customers to railways,
construction, petro-chemicals, power, diesel engines, aviation, defence, agriculture,
mining, oil and gas, industrial machinery, shipping, space etc.
MD
46,10
Table I.
1546
and employees
Global Production of
Outlook
The industry is facing various challenges in domestic and export markets as shown in
Table IV. The Indian automobile sector in general and auto components sector is
particular has been on a spectacular growth trajectory over last 8-10 years (Pillania,
2008). Within the auto industry, commercial vehicles remain the mainstay of the
forging industry, with passenger cars still an important segment. The newer
generation cars will require better quality forgings. Looking at the overall long term
picture, the vehicle industry seems well poised to achieve a figure of 3 million
passenger cars by the year 2015. The estimates for the Indian Auto component
industry are US$ 30-40 billion by 2015 (Pillania, 2007). The growth is expected to be led
by exports which could be worth US$ 20-25 billion by 2015. Going by these estimates a
conservative estimate (15-20 percent) of the production of forgings by 2015 would be to
the tune of US$ 6 billion (AIFI, 2008).
1548
Table III.
Comparative
performance of seven
major forging companies
Full year (Rs Cr.)
Company name Year end Equity Gr. Blk Sales NP NP Var% Div% B.V Rs CPS Rs. EPS Rs.
Ahmednagar Forg. 200806 34.92 393.92 661.16 63.44 2 3.00 0.00 118.40 23.80 18.20
Amforge Inds. 200803 2.96 26.02 50.79 2 1.84 0.00 0.00 25.90 0.00 0.00
Bharat Forge 200803 44.53 2,029.64 2,141.83 252.50 3.00 175.00 66.20 17.00 10.70
Kalyani Forge 200803 3.64 111.75 190.48 9.42 2 15.00 22.00 196.60 48.80 25.90
M M Forgings 200803 6.04 212.06 190.91 14.79 5.00 50.00 144.80 53.70 23.60
Mahindra Forging 200803 80.26 247.77 214.13 3.71 122.00 0.00 96.60 1.90 0.50
Patheja Forgings 199709 26.00 338.04 390.61 2 153.58 0.00 0.00 22.20 0.00 0.00
Source: Capital line Database, 2008
Internationalisation
Domestic/Foreign market Major challenges
of Bharat Forge
Domestic market Volatile international and domestic prices of inputs Limited
Compliance with stringent environment norms
Practical difficulties associated with consolidation of
capacities
High attrition rate, at all levels 1549
High interest rates
Exports market Impact of a rising rupee on export realization
Reluctance of suppliers and end users to compensate
for increasing costs
Inadequate investment in technology up gradation,
due to high costs of capital
Cost competitiveness adversely affected due to
constant cost escalation without adequate
compensation coupled with the impact of a rising Table IV.
rupee Major challenges/key
issues faced by the
Source: Association of Indian Forging Industry (AIFI), 2008 forging industry in India
and marine, mining and construction equipment, and other industries. With a global
forging capacity of over 700,000 TPA, it is producing complex large volume parts in
both steel and aluminium. It undertakes Close Die Forging, Open Die Forging and
Machining It has over 7000 global employees. Backed by a full service supply
capability and dual-shore manufacturing model, Bharat Forge provides end-to-end
solutions from product conceptualisation to designing and finally manufacturing,
testing and validation (BFL web site, 2008).
The company has won many laurels along its journey of internationalisation. BFL is
a recipient of several national and international honours, recognition and awards:
.
Forbes Magazine has listed it for consecutive three years in its global “Best under
a Billion” list.
.
Automotive Component Manufacturers Association of India (ACMA) has
honored it over past four years for its export excellence.
.
BFL has also been awarded the Indo German Chamber of Commerce (IGCC)
Award for “Outstanding Contribution towards Promotion of the Indo-German
Economic Relations for the Year 2005”.
.
Bharat Forge received GKD-NIQR award for “Outstanding Organization” on 23
April 2005.
.
Outlook recognized BFL as the Best Value Creator for 2004 among large
companies (Source: BFL web site, 2008).
1550
Table V.
Gross sales 2,314.37 1,990.84 1,651.44 1,258.63 866.92 648.01 459.02 525.35 558 450.95
Net sales 2,141.83 1,835.04 1,530.52 1,167.06 796.67 597.14 410.41 468.52 496.22 404.58
Other income 173.49 110.49 100.17 59.24 54.28 47.49 24.03 19.44 27.28 35.81
Value of output 2,162.47 1,857.51 1,560 1,194.83 793.88 628.34 408.49 461.95 512.5 402.76
Cost of production 1,667.54 1,396.5 1,167.11 851.06 571.52 450.33 316.88 356.92 382.17 325.11
Selling cost 67.15 45.9 41.98 37.67 24.31 16.81 5.61 5.17 0.35 0.4
PBIDT 640.91 541.22 442.23 333.99 259.14 195.68 119.49 132.71 133.39 113.29
PBDT 535.92 459.11 387.44 300.43 226.78 154.85 74.12 75.41 89.16 70.84
PBIT 501.97 441.42 369.19 281.43 213.37 153.92 79.77 93.02 103.52 84.16
PBT 396.98 359.31 314.4 247.87 181.01 113.09 34. 35.72 59.29 41.71
PAT 273.59 240.95 206.97 161.63 124.91 81.09 21.29 32.65 49.29 37.32
CP 412.53 340.75 280.01 214.19 170.68 122.85 61.01 72.34 79.16 66.45
Revenue earnings in forex 1,067.24 836.1 718.75 534.86 346.49 282.4 116.05 94.1 121.39 78.42
Revenue expenses in forex 178.25 179.48 137.55 65.28 49.61 45.8 17.61 33.41 38.12 32.16
Capital earnings in forex 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Capital expenses in forex 162.67 82.48 223.46 114.98 37.9 23.43 0.32 8.57 60.9 14.11
Book value (unit curr) 66.16 59.13 51.92 106.81 58.72 37.57 41.45 36.86 103.83 108.34
Market Capitalisation 5,952.55 7,012.36 9,886.79 5,457.68 2,764.02 908.09 402.42 308.79 547.3 301.44
CEPS (annualised) (unit curr) 17.89 14.66 12.12 51.61 43.14 31.02 15.85 18.52 20.24 17.24
EPS (annualised) (unit curr) 11.65 10.18 8.83 38.32 31 19.94 5.31 7.99 12.31 9.51
Dividend (annualised %) 175 175 150 125 100 60 35 30 50 40
Payout (%) 30.03 34.36 34.03 35.61 32.25 30.08 65.87 37.55 40.59 42.07
Cash flow from operating activities 345.63 295.77 218.24 137.26 222.95 167.53 142.38 209.91 201.93 164.38
Cash flow from investing activities 2 618.75 2238.62 2680.5 2270.84 2 114.76 2 48.97 254.04 156.51 2142.08 2 59.01
Cash flow from financing activities 2 298.17 173.71 939.54 153.11 2 122.93 2 104.53 281.91 2379.14 249.37 2 120.61
Notes: 1 Crore ¼ 10 million; INR ¼ Indian National Rupee (43 INR ¼ US $1 at end of 2006)
Source: Capitaline Plus data base, 2008
Years/Rate of growth 200803 200703 200603 200503 200403 200303 200203 200103 200003 199903
Net worth (%) 11.88 14.09 173.13 91 56.28 2 9.35 12.43 264.5 24.16 4.86
Capital employed (%) 1.19 26.52 150.64 60.29 8.41 2 11.33 2 0.61 230.68 0.81 2 5.58
Gross block (%) 16.98 37.15 33.34 15.43 6.79 8.85 11.19 2 6.05 44.07 33.87
Gross sales (%) 16.25 20.55 31.21 45.18 33.78 41.17 2 12.63 2 5.85 23.74 2 23.05
Net sales (%) 16.72 19.9 31.14 46.49 33.41 45.5 2 12.4 2 5.58 22.65 2 23.91
Cost of production (%) 20.13 18.59 36.66 54.93 21.68 49.76 2 10.2 2 8.75 19.9 2 19.54
Total assets (%) 6.73 19.21 92.07 48.17 27.71 16.24 2.52 228.96 5.28 2 2.54
PBIDT (%) 18.42 22.38 32.41 28.88 32.43 63.76 2 9.96 2 0.51 17.74 2.8
PBDT (%) 16.73 18.5 28.96 32.48 46.45 108.92 2 1.71 215.42 25.86 8.05
PBIT (%) 13.72 19.56 31.18 31.9 38.62 92.95 2 14.24 210.14 23 2 2.76
PBT (%) 10.48 14.28 26.84 36.94 60.06 228.75 2 3.7 239.75 42.15 2 0.48
PAT (%) 13.55 16.42 28.05 29.4 54.04 280.88 2 34.79 233.76 32.07 3.07
CP (%) 21.07 21.69 30.73 25.49 38.93 101.36 2 15.66 2 8.62 19.13 11.01
Revenue earnings in forex (%) 27.65 16.33 34.38 54.37 22.69 143.34 23.33 222.48 54.79 2 16.6
Revenue expenses in forex (%) 20.69 30.48 110.71 31.59 8.32 160.08 2 47.29 212.36 18.53 2 39.64
Market capitalisation (%) 2 15.11 2 29.07 81.15 97.45 204.38 125.66 30.32 243.58 81.56 2.24
Source: Capitaline Plus data base, 2008
statistics
Bharat Forge growth
Internationalisation
Limited
of Bharat Forge
1551
Table VI.
MD The geographic spread in actual sales in rupees is shown in Table VIII. The sales have
46,10 grown by 17.8 percent for year 2007-2008 which has been a challenging year for due to
currency appreciation, significant slowdown in key markets, and increasing fuel and
steel prices.
Bharat Forge Limited today has manufacturing facilities spread across six
countries and 12 locations – four in India, three in Germany, one each in Sweden,
1552 Scotland, USA and two in China. It has a global presence with foot prints in each of
triad region i.e. North America, Western Europe and Asia. This is highlighted in
Figure 1.
Bharat Forge Limited has more than 35 OEM and Tier 1 customers, which include
the top five passenger car and top five commercial vehicle manufacturers in the world.
It has a diversified product portfolio as shown in Table IX.
In 2000-2001, chassis components for commercial vehicles in India was the major
product for the company, which by 2008 contributes only 35 percent to total sales as
shown in Table X. Now it is targeting to have more than 40 percent of business in
non-automotive segment by 2011-2012.
Mr B.N. Kalyani, an MIT graduate in engineering, is the CMD of the company and
the management team is shown in the list below, the organisational structure is shown
in Figure 2.
.
Chairman & Managing Director – Mr B.N. Kalyani.
.
Dy. Managing Director – Mr GK Agarwal.
.
Executive Director – Mr Amit Kalyani.
. Executive Director – Mr Praveen Maheshwari.
.
Executive Director – Mr Subodh Tandale.
.
Executive Director – Mr B.P. Kalyani.
Europe 49
India 26
North America 17
Asia Pacific (excluding India) 8
Total 100
Table VII.
Geographic spread (2008) Source: BFL Annual Report, 2008
1553
Figure 1.
Global presence
.
Executive Director – Mr Sunil K. Chaturvedi.
.
Non-Executive Director – Mr Prakash C. Bhalerao.
.
Senior Vice President, Chief Compliance Officer, Company Secretary – Mr Beejal
Desai.
Internationalisation journey
Bharat Forge Limited started its international journey with execution of maiden export
order to Greece in 1972. It followed the export mode of internationalisation for over
three decades as shown in Table XI. The 1985 entry into erstwhile USSR provided a
stable export market in USSR but the US and Western European market was difficult
MD
Automotive Non-automotive
46,10
Crankshafts (forged and machined) High technology, highly engineered critical and
Front axle beams (forged and machined) safety forged and machined components such as
Pistons (forged) large crankshafts for marine and power, landing
Steering knuckles (forged and machined) gear, engine and structural parts for aircrafts and
1554 Steering knuckles (steel and aluminium) helicopters, connecting rods for locomotives and
Connecting rods (forged and machined) equalizer bars and spindles and other heavy
Camshafts (forged) products for construction equipment
Rocker arms (forged) Forged and machined components such as gate
Control arms (steel and aluminium) Valves, wellheads, etc. for oilfield industries
Steering arms (forged and machined) Oil and gas
Spindles Gate valve bodies, bonnets, chokes, wellheads, shells
Wheel carriers and plugs
Piston crowns Shaped forgings for both surface and subsea
Marine and power generation
Engine components like crankshafts, connecting
rods, propeller shafts
Energy sector – windmill
Main shafts, sun gear shaft – gear boxes, spur gears
– gear boxes
Aerospace
Engine components, structural components, landing
gears
Construction
Engine components like crankshafts, connecting
rods
Ground engaging tips
Railways
Engine components like crankshafts, connecting
rods, pistons
Signaling equipment, axle components
Table IX.
Product portfolio Source: BFL Annual Report, 2008
to crack. The first big break came from Rockwell International, a partner in one of
group companies in the parent Kalayani Group.
Starting 2004 it moved ahead with inorganic growth path with acquisitions. In
January 2004 BFL acquired Carl Dan Peddinghaus (CDP), the 2nd largest forging
company in Germany that is mainly engaged in the manufacture of passenger car
Internationalisation
of Bharat Forge
Limited
1555
Figure 2.
Organisational structure
components. The company was renamed CDP Bharat Forge. The company was turned
around by 2005. This acquisition made BFL the second largest forging company in the
world.
In October 2004 acquired another Germany company CDP Aluminiumtechnik, a
manufacturer of forged aluminium components for hi-end customers like BMW, Audi,
Volkswagen, Ford and others. The company is now renamed as Bharat Forge – AT.
Aluminium is progressively becoming the preferred material for specialized
automotive applications due to its significantly lighter weight that translates into
better fuel efficiency. While Bharat Forge already had a strong market presence in steel
forgings for commercial vehicles and passenger cars, the new acquisition will
contribute in widening the product offering and enable it to provide customers with a
larger bouquet of steel and aluminium components from a single source.
In 2005, BFL acquired Federal Forge now known as Bharat Forge America Inc.,
which provided BFL with a manufacturing presence in USA – one of its largest
markets. This was followed by the acquisition of Imatra Kilsta, AB, Sweden along with
its wholly owned subsidiary Scottish Stampings, Scotland (together called as Imatra
Forging Group).
In December 2005 Bharat Forge signed a JV with FAW Corporation – the largest
automotive group in China. Through this JV, BFL made a powerful entry into the large
and fast growing Chinese automotive market. The Forging Company of the FAW
group is the largest in China, and by joining hands with them, BFL instantly became
the largest forging company in China.
MD
Year Milestones in International Journey of BFL
46,10
1972 Execution of maiden export order to Greece
1985 Entry in the erstwhile USSR market by winning a large contract for under
carriage components
1990-1991 Major breakthrough in the developed markets of Japan, USA and UK for the
1556 critical suspension and engine components like front axle beams and machined
crankshafts
1991 Implementation of a large US $ 50 million forging facility up-gradation
programme by commissioning of 16,000 MT’s and 6,000 MT’s Weingarten
(Germany) make of screw press lines
2000 Implementation of a US $ 30 million forging facility expansion programme by
commissioning of second 16,000 MT’s Weingarten (Germany) make screw and
2,500 MT’s mechanical press lines
2002 Major breakthrough in exports by catching Toyota for supplying small forgings
for its global and Indian operations
Exports of front axle components of trucks to Renault Vehicle Industries, the
second largest truck manufacturers in Europe
2003 Successful entry into US passenger car markets by exports to Ford Motors and
Daimler Chrysler
2004 Acquired Carl Dan Peddinghaus GmbH & Co. KG (CDP), one of the largest
German Forging Companies with plants in Ennepetal and Daun
Acquired CDP Aluminiumtechnik now known as Bharat Forge
Aluminiumtechnik. Provided an entry into the hi-end and fast growing
aluminium component business
2005 Acquired Federal Forge now known as Bharat Forge America Inc. Provided BFL
with a manufacturing presence in USA – one of its largest markets
Acquired Imatra Kilsta, AB, Sweden along with its wholly owned subsidiary
Scottish Stampings, Scotland (together called as Imatra Forging Group)
Table XI. Signed a JV with FAW Corporation – the largest automotive group in China. JV
Major milestones in named FAW Bharat Forge
international journey of
BFL Source: BFL web site, 2008
BFL global acquisition strategy comprised two key elements. The first is to widen and
broaden the company’s customer base by bringing in a wider portfolio of product
offerings to a larger group of customers. And, second, to have global facilities that
enable us to work with OEMs as an engineering and development partner. The
strategy, therefore, focused on acquiring such companies that had product
complementarities and manufacturing facilities, which were synergistic and could be
leveraged for cost effective and flexible production systems (BFL, 2006).
Thus Bharat Forge Limited has used exports, acquisitions and recently joint
venture in its internationalisation journey. It has used two-part strategy, the first being
expanding its capacity in India, which was used for supporting exports and the second
of acquisitions path.
Integration success
Merger and acquisitions has a poor success rate. Most acquisitions and alliances fail. A
few may succeed, but acquisitions, on average, either destroy or don’t add shareholder
value (Dyer et al., 2004). However BFL has been able to create value out of acquisitions.
The company has used a two-stage policy for integration. In the first phase, the Internationalisation
company focused on alignment of the acquired company with BFL in the first six to of Bharat Forge
eight months after each acquisition. In the second phase focus was on alignment in all
the business processes. The firm has derivative manufacturing council, global Limited
innovation council and common marketing organization where global best practices
are shared. All of the acquired companies except Sweden were making losses when
BFL acquired them. Now all of these are making profits (Anand, 2007). 1557
I am happy to inform you that we have laid a lot of emphasis on the integration between
Bharat Forge and its global operations. The objective was to bring people from across the
world together and create a common understanding of the goals and objectives of our
company, and help build strong working relationships to enable quick implementation of our
strategic plans (Baba Kalayni, CMD (BFL, 2005)).
It has put in efforts for developing strategy and making it relevant with the changing
scenario. It has progressed from the beginning made in 1997 with help from Tata
Strategic Management Group, to global leadership and recent focus towards
1558 innovation.
In 1997, BFL worked with the Tata Strategic Management Group (TSMG) to draw
up a five-year strategic plan. The objectives were to grow the business aggressively by
accessing global markets; to be among the top three global players in the chosen
industry segment; to set global industry benchmarks in cost, quality, technology,
speed-to-market and customer service; and to create sustainable competitive
advantage by taking strategic initiatives in areas of marketing, technology and
product development, operations and human resources.
With increasing success in the twenty-first century in international markets, BFL
focused on creating a position of global leadership in engine and chassis components
for passenger and commercial vehicles and has embarked upon a three-pronged
strategy to offer customers dual-shore design capability, dual shore forging
manufacturing capability, and dual-shore machining capability. That means offering
these facilities from different centres, whichever is the most appropriate in each
individual case. It has also set up a centre of excellence in Germany with a specific
focus on frontline product development capability and participation in the product
development initiatives of customers (Thomas, 2006). Recently BFL has recently
unveiled a new identity with focus on innovation.
Customer relationships
Today the company has a big customer base and almost all the big OEMs and Tier-I
firms are in the customer list. The company has put efforts for developing customer
relationships and moved from a supplier to development partner and full service
provider for customers from design to delivery of finished products. The company has
focused on building strong design and engineering capabilities to each of its global
locations to respond to the global customers’ preference for suppliers having such
facilities close to their product development facilities.
Fortunately for your company, we have strong and durable relationships with all our
customers, both domestic and international. Our contracts with them have pass through
clauses, which enable us to recover steel price increases. Transparency coupled with mutual
trust and confidence with customers has therefore, enabled us to minimize the impact of
higher input costs on performance (Kalayani, CMD (Moneycontrol, 2008)).
Figure 3.
Dual shore manufacturing
MD BFL has been able to bring operation efficiency among the units it has acquired
internationally. We have always given concerted attention to costs and productivity. I can
46,10 assure you that however large we are, we will always be concerned about productivity,
throughputs and costs. It is part of our DNA. We could build scale and created an
environment to share best practices across the organization through flexible product lines.
We now have the capability to manufacture large volumes of forged and value-added
machined products. We have further been able to enhance growth in rated capacities by
1560 sharing best-in-class shop floor practices within our group companies which have resulted in
increases in productivity and throughput (Kalayani, CMD (BFL, 2008)).
Conclusion
A lot of interest has been there in internationalisation process since long in
international business research (Berkema and Drogendijk, 2007). Internationalisation
is a topic at the core of the international business field, as most questions dealt with in
international business research emerge as a consequence of the interaction between the
firm and the different locations (Hutzschenreuter et al., 2007). There are two broad
approaches to internationalisation namely, the traditional stages approach and the
more recent born global approach (Pillania, 2009).
Firms embody disadvantages in competing with indigenous firms in foreign
markets and therefore internationalisation is about overcoming the inherent
disadvantage of liability of foreignness (Hymer, 1960, 1968; Hutzschenreuter et al.,
2007; Pillania, 2009).The famous Uppasala model (Johnson and Vahlne, 1977, 1990)
suggests that companies internationalise in small, incremental steps and the
internationalisation of the firm should be interpreted as an incremental learning
process (Cyert and March, 1963; Berkema and Drogendijk, 2007; Hutzschenreuter et al.,
2007). The liability of foreignness and information asymmetry were the major reasons
for firms to follow the traditional and more widely accepted stages model of Internationalisation
internationalisation (Pillania, 2009). of Bharat Forge
However, starting with the McKinensey findings of 1993 in Australia, born global is
an alternate approach which has gained some more support from similar studies in Limited
Europe. Born global firms go to international markets soon after their operations and
go at a fast speed (McKinsey, 1993; Rasmussen and Madsen, 2002; Pillania, 2009).
In the case under study, Bharat Forge Limited has followed the traditional stages 1561
approach for internationalisation. It started global foray with exports and continued
with that for more than three decades before going for acquisitions way. Based on the
accumulated leanings and resources, it has gone further in the internationalisation
process.
Further, in international business strategy, there has been considerable debate and
questions on global strategy, both for (Hamel and Prahalad, 1985; Govindarajan and
Gupta, 2001; Yip, 2002) and against global strategy (Rugman, 2000; Rugman and
Brain, 2003; Ghemawat, 2001, 2003). Even by the recent empirical evidence and view
that a global firm with global strategy must have a reasonable (at least 20 percent) of
sales coming from each of the three triad regions of North America, Europe and Asia
(Rugman, 2003), Bharat Forge Limited has become a global firm with global strategy.
References
Anand, M. (2007), “We want to be in every BRIC economy: Baba Kalayani”, Outlook Business
online, available at: www.outlookbusiness.com/print.aspx?articleid ¼ 464&editionid ¼
18&catgid ¼ 11&subcatgid ¼ 9 (accessed 12 June 2008).
Association of Indian Forging Industry (AIFI) (2008), “Current trends: Indian forging industry”,
AIFI web site, available at: www.indianforging.org/current_trend.aspx (accessed 14 June).
Barkema, H.G. and Drogendijk, R. (2007), “Internationalizing in small, incremental or larger
steps?”, Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 38 No. 2, pp. 1132-48.
BFL (2005), “Annual report 2004-05”, BFL web site, available at: www.bharatforge.com (accessed
12 June).
BFL (2006), “Annual report 2005-06”, BFL web site, available at: www.bharatforge.com (accessed
12 June).
BFL (2008), “Annual report 2007-08”, BFL web site, available at: www.bharatforge.com (accessed
12 June).
Cyert, R.M. and March, J.G. (1963), A Behavioral Theory of the Firm, Blackwell Business,
Cambridge, MA.
Dyer, J.H., Kale, P. and Singh, H. (2004), “When to all & when to acquire”, Harvard Business
Review, Vol. 82 No. 7, pp. 109-15.
Euroforge (2008), “Industry portrait”, Euroforge web site, available at: www.euroforge.org/page/
industry_portrait.html (accessed 12 June 2008).
Ghemawat, P. (2001), “Distance still matters: the hard reality of global expansion”, Harvard
Business Review, Vol. 79 No. 8, pp. 137-47.
Ghemawat, P. (2003), “Semiglobalization and international business strategy”, Journal of
International Business Studies, Vol. 34 No. 2, pp. 138-52.
Govindarajan, V. and Gupta, A. (2001), The Quest for Global Dominance, Jossey-Bass/Wiley, San
Francisco, CA.
MD Hamel, G. and Prahalad, C.K. (1985), “Do you really have a global strategy?”, Harvard Business
Review, Vol. 63 No. 4, pp. 139-48.
46,10
Hutzschenreuter, T., Pedersen, T. and Volberda, H.W. (2007), “The role of path dependency and
managerial intentionality: a perspective on international business research”, Journal of
International Business Studies, Vol. 38 No. 2, pp. 1055-68.
Hymer, S. (1960), “The international operations of national firms: a study of direct investments”,
1562 PhD dissertation, Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
(published by MIT Press under same title in 1976).
Hymer, S. (1968), “La grande firme internattionale”, Revue Economique, Vol. 14(b), pp. 949-73.
Johanson, J. and Vahlne, J.E. (1977), “The internationalization process of the firm: a model of
knowledge development and increasing foreign market commitments”, Journal of
International Business Studies, Vol. 8 No. 1, pp. 23-32.
Johanson, J. and Vahlne, J.E. (1990), “The mechanism of internationalization”, International
Marketing Review, Vol. 7 No. 4, pp. 11-24.
McKinsey & Company (1993), Emerging Exporters. Australia’s High Value-Added
Manufacturing Exporters, McKinsey & Company and the Australian Manufacturing
Council, Melbourne.
Moneycontrol (2008), “Bhart Forge-Chairman Speech 2008”, Moneycontrol web site, available at:
www.moneycontrol.com/stocks/company_info/chairmans_speech.php?sc_did ¼ BF03
(accessed 18 August 2008).
Rasmussen, E.S. and Madsen, T.K. (2002), “The Born Global Concept, 28th EIBA Conference,
Denmark”, available at: www.aueb.gr/deos/EIBA2002.files/PAPERS/S4.pdf (accessed on
23 March 2008).
Pillania, R.K. (2007), “Indian automobile components industry: a global perspective”, NICE
Journal of Business, Vol. 2 No. 2, pp. 32-41.
Pillania, R.K. (2008), “Knowledge management in SMEs in India – a study of auto components
sector”, International Journal of Electric and Hybrid Vehicles (IJEHV), Vol. 1 No. 3,
pp. 308-18.
Pillania, R.K. (2009), “Internationalisation of Essel Propack Limited”, Management Research
News, Vol. 32 No. 2 (in press).
Reuters (2008), “Bharat Forge betting on power, aerospace”, Reuters online, May 21, available at:
http://in.reuters.com/article/businessNews/idINIndia-33686620080521 (accessed 12 August).
Rugman, A.M. (2003), “Regional strategy and the demise of globalization”, Journal of
International Management, Vol. 9 No. 4, pp. 409-17.
Rugman, A.M. (2000), The End of Globalization, Random House, London and
Amacom-McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.
Rugman, A.M. and Brain, C. (2003), “Multinational enterprises are regional, not global”,
Multinational Business Review, Vol. 11 No. 1, pp. 3-12.
Thomas, C.P. (2006), “The road ahead”, India Brand Equity Foundation web site, available at:
www.ibef.org/download/corporatebharatforge_june06.pdf (accessed 12 June 2008).
Yip, G. (2002), Total Global Strategy II, Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
Further reading
Google Finance (2008), “Bharat Forge Limited”, Google Finance Online, available at: http://
finance.google.com/finance?q ¼ BOM:500493 (accessed 12 August 2008).
Levitt, T. (1983), “The globalization of markets”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 61 No. 5, Internationalisation
pp. 92-102.
Mukherji, S. and Ramachandran, J. (2005), “Bharat Forge Limited: forging leadership”, case
of Bharat Forge
study, Indian Institute of Management, Bangalore. Limited