Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Airport Site Selection Study Final Analysis

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 26
At a glance
Powered by AI
The document discusses the results of a site selection study to identify potential new locations for an airport to replace the existing Griffin-Spalding County Airport, which is constrained in its ability to expand and modernize. Sites 6 and 7 were selected as the top candidates for further analysis based on factors like infrastructure requirements, environmental impact, construction feasibility, and compatibility with industrial development.

The study evaluated potential sites according to infrastructure/land acquisition needs, environmental considerations, feasibility of construction, operational capability, and compatibility with industrial development.

Sites 6 and 7 were selected as the top two sites to receive further detailed analysis, including development plans, cost estimates, environmental reviews, and consideration of adjacent industrial park concepts.

Griffin-Spalding County Airport

Airport Site Selection Study Final Analysis


Presented to

July 16, 2009

Todays Briefing
Existing Griffin-Spalding County Airport Review of Previous Site Selection Study Tasks Final Analysis of Sites 6 and 7 Refined Site Layouts Cost Estimates Funding Timeline Tenant Relocation Comparisons to Existing Airport Next Steps Authorize Environmental Study

Existing Griffin-Spalding County Airport Current Airport Development Options Are Limited/Constrained by Encroachment

Previous Studies
Master Plan Recommendations (2003):
Extend Runway to 5,000 feet (Ultimate) Install Precision Landing System Construct Additional Aircraft Parking

State System Plan Recommendations (2004):


Extend Runway 5,000 Feet (Minimum)

Airport Site Selection Study


Purpose: Determine If A Suitable Replacement Airport Site Exists In Spalding County Established Suitability Criteria for Ideal Site Used GIS Analysis to Focus on Ideal Areas and Eliminate Unacceptable Areas Reasoning: Cost Of Replacement Airport May Be Less Than Upgrading Existing Airport

Site Selection Methodology

Eight Sites Selected for Preliminary Screening

Note: Sites are labeled randomly; not according to degree of suitability.

Site Selection Study Phase II


Eight Sites Ranked According To:
Infrastructure/Land Acquisition Environmental Considerations Constructability Operational Capability Industrial Compatibility

Preliminary Site Ratings Phase II


Site 1 Site 2 Site 3 Site 4 Site 5 Site 6 Site 7 Site 8 Infrastructure/Land Acquisition Environmental Constructability Operational Capability Site Ratings 1.50 1.80 1.50 1.50 1.46 1.83 1.90 1.50 1.50 2.00 1.75 2.17 2.20 2.50 1.75 3.00 2.32 3.00 2.20 1.33 1.25 3.00 2.16 1.17 2.50 2.50 2.25 1.00 1.88 1.83 2.40 1.67 2.00 3.00 2.18 2.33 2.10 1.50 2.00 1.00 1.79 1.67 2.40 1.67 2.00 1.00 1.75

Industrial Compatibility 1.00

1-least desirable; 3-most desirable Gray sites were eliminated from further analysis.

Site 6 was the primary site and Site 7 was the secondary site for continuing detailed analysis.

Preliminary Sites

Site Selection Study Final Analysis Top 2 Sites

Detailed Analysis Site 6 and Site 7


Basic Grading Plans Land Acquisition and Relocation Environmental Considerations Adjacent Industrial/Tech Park Concepts Construction Requirements Cost Estimates Funding Timeline

Site 6 Initial Development

Cost Estimates
Site 6 Site Selection, Environmental, and Planning Studies $ 1,030,000 $ Site7 1,030,000

Land Acquisition and Relocation $ $ Obstruction Removal Environmental Mitigation Construction - Airport Construction - Facilities $ $

7,000,000 $ 19,900,000 6,000,000 $ 3,800,000 $ 600,000 $ 6,000,000 2,900,000 600,000

$ 38,000,000 $ 43,900,000

Total Initial Airport Cost Estimate $ 56,430,000 $ 74,330,000 $ 2,984,000 $ 3,750,000 Local Funds Estimate

Potential Funding Timeline


Total Costs 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 $ $ $ 240,000 360,000 430,000 ($ FAA Funds State Funds Local Funds 978,500) 8,455,000 $ 9,785,000 $ 9,690,000 $ 5,700,000 $ 8,455,000 $ 4,750,000 $ $ ($ 240,000 360,000 548,500) 5,222,500 2,257,500 255,000 650,000 1,197,500

$ 13,900,000 $ $ 12,300,000 $ $ 10,200,000 $ $ 8,000,000 $ $ 11,000,000 $ $

222,500 $ 257,500 $ 255,000 $ 1,650,000 $ 1,347,500 $ -

($ 4,750,000)

2018 $ 1,900,000 Total Costs $ 56,430,000 $ 49,732,500 $

($ 1,900,000) 3,732,500 $ 2,984,000

Potential Funding Timeline


Environmental Mitigation Land Acquisition Site Clearing Local - $5,222,500 Land Acquisition Airfield Grading & Drainage Site Selection Study Local $240,000 Environmental Env. Permitting Assessment Airport Master Plan Local Local - $430,000 $360,000 Local - $2,257,500 ENVIRONMENTAL AND PLANNING APPROVED BY FAA

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

Federal Reimbursement ($978,500) Site Selection Ph. I & II Environmental Assessment & Permitting Airport Master Plan

Potential Funding Timeline


Existing Airport Leasehold Buyout Local - $8,400,000 Airfield Paving, Lighting, Marking Install ILS Construct Terminal Obstruction Removal Airport Entrance Road & Site Utilities Airfield Grading Local - $650,000 & Drainage Local - $255,000 Local - $1,197,500 NEW AIRPORT OPENS Tenants Transition

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

Federal Reimbursement Land Acquisition ($ 1,900,000) Federal Reimbursement Land Acquisition ($ 4,750,000) Sale of Existing Airport ($8,400,000 +)

Potential Tenant Transition


New Airport Opens: 2017 (estimated) Existing Airport Remains Open During Construction Both Airports Open for a Short Transition Period Existing Airport Closed by 2019 (estimated)

Existing Leaseholds
City/County Negotiates with Private Hangar Leaseholds Leases Do Not Specify a Reversion Clause Most Leases Have 20+ Years Remaining Improvements on Leasehold Based on Appraisals Value of Leasehold Improvements is ~ $7.5 to $8.4 Million (2009 Dollars)

Redevelopment of Existing Airport


City/County Must Sell Airport Property and Reinvest Proceeds into New Airport
Recover Cost of Acquiring Existing Leaseholds Sell 120 Acres of Non-Leased Area

Any New Leases Should State Shorter Time Period; Must Relocate Improvements at Own Expense Potentially Redevelop Existing Airport into Compatible Uses

Comparison Runway Capabilities


Site 6 - Initial Runway Length Runway Width Available Landing Length Pavement Strength 5,500 100 5,500 75,000 lbs Site 7 - Initial 5,500 100 5,500 75,000 lbs Existing Site 3,701 75 3,501 30,000 lbs Existing Site with Master Plan Improvements 5,000 100 4,750 30,000 lbs

Design Aircraft Gulfstream III Percent of General Aviation Fleet Served Gulfstream III King Air 90 Citation II

94%

94%

50%

65%

Comparison Instrument Approach Capabilities


Site 6 - Initial Site 7 - Initial Existing Site Existing Site with Master Plan Improvements

Precision Instrument Landing System Lowest Minima Approaches for Larger GA Aircraft Clear Approaches

Yes

Yes

No

Yes

Yes Yes Yes

Yes Yes Yes

No No No

No No No

Existing Airport Constraints

Comparison Landside Development


Site 6 - Initial Site 7 - Initial Existing Site Existing Site with Master Plan Improvements 479 acres Constrained Road/Structure Relocations

Acreage Landside Capacity Ability to Lengthen Runway to 6,000 Industrial/ Technology Park Potential

320 acres Unconstrained

416 acres Unconstrained

198 acres Constrained Road/Structure Relocations

Suitable Adjacent Suitable Adjacent Property Property

Yes

Yes

No

No

Comparison - Cost
Existing Airport No Build* Existing Site with Master Plan Improvements 62,000,000

Site 6 - Initial

Site 7 - Initial

Cost Estimates

56,430,000 $

74,330,000 $

15,000,000 $

* Cost shown for existing airport reflects anticipated cost to maintain current infrastructure.

Benefits of a New Airport


Built to FAA Safety Standards
Better Instrument Approach Minima Improved Safety Areas & Set Backs

Greater Access for Corporate Aircraft Future Expansion Potential


Ample Developable Property Compatible Land Use

Economic Development Opportunities In a 2000 NBAA Survey, 85% of Businesses Utilize General Aviation Airports

Next Steps
Airport Advisory Board Recommended Approval of Site Selection Study to City and County Commissions on 20 May 2009. City and County Commissions Approve Site Selection Study and Proceed to Next Phase Environmental Documentation.

You might also like