BMC Public Health

Research article

BioMed Central

Open Access

Relationship between body image disturbance and incidence of depression: the SUN prospective cohort
Adriano Maral Pimenta1, Almudena Snchez-Villegas2,3, Maira Bes-Rastrollo2, Celeste Nicole Lpez4 and Miguel ngel Martnez-Gonzlez*2
Address: 1Department of Maternal and Child Nursing and Public Health, Nursing School, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG), Avenida Alfredo Balena, 190. Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, CEP 30130-100, Brazil , 2Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Medical School, Clnica Universitaria/Universidad de Navarra (UNAV), Inrunlarrea, 1. Pamplona, Navarra, E 31080, Spain, 3Department of Clinical Sciences, Medical School, Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria (ULPGC), PO BOX: 550, Las Palmas, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, CP. 35080, Spain and 4Harvard Medical School, Harvard University, 25 Shattuck Street, Boston, Massachusetts, 02115, USA E-mail: Adriano Maral Pimenta - adrianompimenta@yahoo.com.br; Almudena Snchez-Villegas - asanchez@dcc.ulpgc.es; Maira Bes-Rastrollo - mbes@unav.es; Celeste Nicole Lpez - celestenicole.lopez@gmail.com; Miguel ngel Martnez-Gonzlez* - mamartinez@unav.es; *Corresponding author

Published: 02 January 2009 BMC Public Health 2009, 9:1 doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-9-1

Received: 2 April 2008 Accepted: 2 January 2009

This article is available from: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/9/1 2009 Pimenta et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract
Background: Body image disturbance is an increasing problem in Western societies and is associated with a number of mental health outcomes including anorexia, bulimia, bodydysmorphia, and depression. The aim of this study was to assess the association between body image disturbance and the incidence of depression. Methods: This study included 10,286 participants from a dynamic prospective cohort of Spanish university graduates, who were followed-up for a median period of 4.2 years (Seguimiento Universidad de Navarra the SUN study). The key characteristic of the study is the permanently open recruitment that started in 1999. The baseline questionnaire included information about body mass index (BMI) and the nine figure schemes that were used to assess body size perception. These variables were grouped according to recommended classifications and the difference between BMI and body size perception was considered as a proxy of body image disturbance. A subject was classified as an incident case of depression if he/she was initially free of depression and reported a physician-made diagnosis of depression and/or the use of antidepressant medication in at least one of the follow-up questionnaires. The association between body image disturbance and the incidence of depression was estimated by calculating the multivariable adjusted Odds Ratio (OR) and its 95% Confidence Interval (95% CI), using logistic regression models. Results: The cumulative incidence of depression during follow-up in the cohort was 4.8%. Men who underestimated their body size had a high percentage of overweight and obesity (50.1% and 12.6%, respectively), whereas women who overestimated their body size had a high percentage of underweight (87.6%). The underestimation exhibited a negative association with the incidence of depression among women (OR: 0.72, 95% CI: 0.54 0.95), but this effect disappeared after adjusting for possible confounding variables. The proportion of participants who correctly perceived their body size was high (53.3%) and gross misperception was seldom found, with most cases selecting only one silhouette below (42.7%) or above (2.6%) their actual BMI. Conclusion: We found no association between body image disturbance and subsequent depression in a cohort of university graduates in Spain.

Page 1 of 9
(page number not for citation purposes)

BMC Public Health 2009, 9:1

http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/9/1

Background
Body image disturbance is defined as a distortion of perception, behavior, or cognition related to weight or shape [1], and it is becoming a common clinical disorder [2-7]. Aesthetic standards typical of Western cultures, based on the stereotype of a lean body for women and a muscular body for men, are considered possible determinants of body image disturbance [8, 9]. While most women wish to lose weight [10] even when their anthropometric parameters were normal, a significant number of men have shown muscle dissatisfaction [11]. Some reports in the scientific literature have found an association between body image disturbance and a number of mental health outcomes including depression [12-17], anorexia [12-14], bulimia [12-14], and body dysmorphia [16]. Currently, depression is a major public health problem. There is an estimated 150 million people around the world who suffer from this disease, and it is the first and the fourth cause of morbidity among women and men, respectively [18]. Recent data from the European Community suggest that depression is responsible for 6.2% of all cases of disability-adjusted life years, making it the third cause of morbidity in this continent, surpassed only ischemic heart disease and stroke [19]. In Spain, the European Study of the Epidemiology of Mental Disorders (ESEMED) showed that depression was the most common mental disorder in the country's population, with a prevalence of 3.9% [20]. Depression has a significant socioeconomic impact on a society, because it can lead to absence from work. Furthermore, depression is strongly related to suicide, which is also a major health problem worldwide [18]. Thus, research of factors associated with depression is important in order to reduce the magnitude and consequences of this disease. Results of some studies have shown that body image disturbance is associated with depression [8, 10, 16, 17]. Other researchers suggest that depression predisposes to body image disturbance [12, 13, 15]. However, these previous studies had a cross sectional design, which does not assure the temporal sequence of the association investigated. Therefore, the aim of our study was to assess the association between body image disturbance and

incidence of depression in a large prospective cohort of university graduates in Spain.

Methods
Subjects The SUN project (Seguimiento Universidad de Navarra) is a multi-purpose, dynamic cohort conducted in Spain, consisting of exclusively university graduates as participants. The recruitment of participants began in December 1999 and it is permanently open. Information is collected using self-administered questionnaires sent by postal mail every two years. The objectives and methods of this project have been detailed previously [21].

As of February 2008, data from 19,057 participants were coded and prepared for analysis. All participants who complete a baseline assessment (Q_0) before May 2005 were eligible for these analyses (n = 15,502). Among them, 1,852 did not answer any of the follow-up questionnaires; after five mailings, they were considered lost to follow-up. We retained 13,650 participants. Among them, 4,328 were recruited more than 6 years ago and we had data from the baseline (Q_0), the 2-year (Q_2), the 4-year (Q_4), and the 6-year (Q_6) follow-up questionnaires. The number of participants retained for the 4-year follow-up (they returned Q_2 and Q_4) and for the 2-year follow-up (they returned Q_2) were 4,265 and 5,057, respectively. The overall follow-up rate was approximately 89%. Participants who had some of the following characteristics were excluded from the analysis (n = 3,364): subjects who reported the use of antidepressants or those with a self-reported physician-made diagnosis of depression at baseline (n = 1,565), those who reported extremely low or high values for total energy intake, because they were more likely to have failed to properly complete the questionnaire (less than 800 Kcal/day in men and 500 Kcal/day in women or more than 4000 Kcal/day in men and 3500 Kcal/day in women) (n = 1,184), we also excluded those without information on body size perception (n = 582), and pregnant women at baseline (n = 33). Finally, data from 10,286 participants remained available for the analysis. The study was approved by the Human Research Ethical Committee at the University of Navarra. Voluntary completion of the first questionnaire was considered to imply informed consent.
Exposure assessment The information about self-reported BMI was collected in the baseline questionnaire (Q_0) and grouped into four categories using the cut-off points established by the

Page 2 of 9
(page number not for citation purposes)

BMC Public Health 2009, 9:1

http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/9/1

WHO: BMI <= 19.99 kg/m2 for underweight subjects, 20.00 kg/m2 <= BMI <= 24.99 kg/m2 for normal weight subjects, 25.00 kg/m2 <= BMI <= 29.99 kg/m2 for overweight subjects and BMI >= 30.00 kg/m2 for obese subjects [22]. The self-reported BMI by participants of the SUN study was validated in a specific study exhibiting a high degree of validity (mean error = 1.4%) [23]. Body size perception was also assessed in the baseline questionnaire (Q_0) with the nine figure scheme (Figure 1), which was validated by Stunkard [24]. Participants were asked to select which of the nine figures most closely represent their body size. After this, they were grouped into four categories following the recommended classification: pictures 1, 2 and 3 as equivalent to underweight (BMI <= 19.99 kg/m2), pictures 4 and 5 to represent normal weight (20.00 kg/m2 <= BMI <= 24.99 kg/m2), pictures 6 and 7 representing overweight (25.00 kg/m2 <= BMI <= 29.99 kg/ m2) and pictures 8 and 9 representing obesity (BMI >= 30.00 kg/m2) [25]. The comparison between the categories of BMI and body size perception was conducted and the differences were considered as a proxy of body image disturbance. We classified individuals as overestimating their body size when they classified themselves into a higher body size category than their actual BMI. We classified individuals as underestimating their body size when they classified themselves into a lower body size category than their actual BMI.

Covariate assessment The baseline questionnaire (Q_0) included 554 questions about a wide array of characteristics: socio-demographic (e.g. sex, age and marital status), anthropometric (e.g. weight and height, weight gain in the past five years), lifestyle and health-related habits (e.g. smoking status, physical activity), diet (e.g. energy and alcohol intakes), employment status (e.g. employed/unemployed and working hours/week), obstetric history for women (e.g. pregnancy) and medical history (e.g. prevalence of chronic diseases and medication use). Total energy and alcohol intakes were ascertained through a semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire (136 food items) previously validated in Spain [26]. Physical activity was collected through a validated questionnaire that included information about 17 activities such as walking, running, cycling, swimming, judo, soccer, skiing or sailing. To quantify the volume of activity during leisure time, an activity metabolic equivalent (MET) index was computed by assigning a multiple of resting metabolic rate (MET score) to each activity [27], and the time spent in each of the activities was multiplied by the MET score specific to each activity, and then summed the overall activities obtaining a value of overall weekly MET-hours. Leisure time physical activity estimated with the questionnaire was previously validated by our group using a tri-axial accelerometer as the gold standard. Physical activity during leisure time (estimated as MET-h/week) derived from the questionnaire moderately correlated with Kcal/day assessed through the accelerometer (Spearman's rho = 0.507, 95% CI: 0.232 0.707, p < 0.001) [28].

Participants were classified as having cardiovascular disease at baseline or at follow-up if they reported at least one of the following conditions: myocardial infarction, stroke, atrial fibrillation, paroxysmal tachycardia, coronary artery bypass grafting or other revascularization procedures, heart failure, aortic aneurism, pulmonary embolism, or peripheral venous thrombosis. Information regarding cancer both at baseline and during follow-up was also collected.
Outcome assessment Any participant, initially free of depression and of antidepressant treatment, who positively responded to the following question in Q_2, Q_4 or Q_6: "Have you ever been diagnosed of depression by a health professional?," was classified as an incident case of depression. A self-report of a physician-made diagnosis of depression has been validated in our cohort using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (SCID-I) as gold standard. Sixty two subjects with a self-reported physician-made

Figure 1 Options presented to select their silhouettes. F1/M1 F3/M3 = underweight (BMI <= 19.99 kg/m2); F4/M4 F5/M5 = normal weight (20.00 kg/m2 <= BMI <= 24.99 kg/m2); F6/M6 F7/M7 = overweight (25.00 kg/m2 <= BMI <= 29.99 kg/m2); F8/M8 F9/M9 = obesity (BMI >= 30.00 kg/m2).

Page 3 of 9
(page number not for citation purposes)

BMC Public Health 2009, 9:1

http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/9/1

diagnosis of depression and 42 subjects without the diagnosis were included in the validation study. The percentage of confirmed depression was 74.2%; 95% CI: 63.3 85.1. The percentage of confirmed non-depression was 81.1%; 95% CI: 69.1 92.9 (submitted article).
Statistical analysis The analysis was stratified by sex. Non-conditional logistic regression models were fit to assess the relationship between body image disturbance and incidence of depression in our cohort. Odds Ratios (OR) and their 95% Confidence Intervals (CI) were calculated taking as the reference category those subjects who had agreement between the body size perception and self-reported BMI.

Table 1: Characteristics of participants and non-participants in the SUN study.

Characteristics Incidence of depression (n, %) Age [years] (mean, SD)a Sex (n, %)a Male Female Body mass index [Kg/m2] (n, %)a Underweight Overweight Obese Weight change in the past five years [Kg] (n, %) Lost Gain Marital status (n, %)a Unmarried Married Other Body image (n, %) Underestimated Overestimated

Participants (n = 10,286) 498 (4.8) 37.7 (11.9)

Non-participants (n = 8,771) 105 (1.2) 39.2 (12.6)

4368 (42.5) 5918 (57.5)

3115 (35.5) 5656 (64.5)

1469 (14.3) 2541 (24.7) 452 (4.4)

1370 (15.6) 2273 (25.9) 461 (5.3)

Potential confounders included in the multivariate models were: age (continuous), working hours (< 35 hours/week, >= 35 hours/week, unemployed), weight gain in the past five years (none, lost, gain), marital status (unmarried, married, other), smoking (never, past smoker and current smoker), presence of any severe disease at baseline (cardiovascular and cancer), presence of any severe disease at follow-up (cardiovascular and cancer), alcohol intake (g/day, continuous), total energy intake (Kcal/day, continuous) physical activity during leisure time (weekly MET-hours, continuous) and pregnancy at follow-up. All p values presented are 2-tailed; p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

2466 (24.0) 4849 (47.1)

2128 (24.3) 4053 (46.2)

4597 (45.0) 5246 (51.4) 368 (3.6) 4542 (44.2) 265 (2.6)

3727 (42.9) 4423 (50.9) 539 (6.2) 3474 (44.9) 230 (3.0)

Standard deviation (SD), a Statistical significant difference.

Results
The mean follow-up of participants was 4.4 years (median = 4.2 years). Three hundred thirty eight participants initially free of depression reported a medical diagnosis of depression during this period (95 men and 243 women). In addition, there were 160 participants with no medical diagnosis of depression, but who reported initiation of antidepressants (67 men and 93 women). Therefore, the overall cumulative incidence of depression in this population was 4.8% during the follow up period. We show in table 1 some characteristics of participants and non-participants of this study. The non-participants were older, consumed more energy, and worked less hours/week than participants. The non-participants also had a higher proportion of women, ex-smokers, overweight, and obesity than participants. Table 2 shows the main characteristics of participants according to the categories of the variable 'body image disturbance'. Among men, those who overestimated their body size showed higher frequency of body weight gain in the past five years, and more of them were

ex-smokers compared to those who underestimated or correctly perceived their body size. The men who overestimated their body size also were older and had lower average physical activity during leisure time than those who underestimated or correctly perceived their body size. Furthermore, among men who underestimated their body size there was a higher proportion of overweight and obesity than those who overestimated or correctly perceived their body size. Among women, those who overestimated their body size showed a higher proportion of underweight, and more of them were unmarried in comparison with those who underestimated or correctly perceived their body size. The women who overestimated their body size also had lower average age, lower alcohol consumption, and a greater proportion of unemployment than those who underestimated or correctly perceived their body size. We show in table 3 the results of the logistic regression models fitted to evaluate the association between body image disturbance and the incidence of depression. This relationship was not statistically significant in either sex. After additionally adjusting for the occurrence of pregnancy or the incidence of cardiovascular disease and cancer during follow-up, the association between body

Page 4 of 9
(page number not for citation purposes)

BMC Public Health 2009, 9:1

http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/9/1

Table 2: Characteristics of participants in the SUN study according to sex.

Sex Male Body image disturbance None n = 1,875 Depression (n, %) Age [years] (mean, SD)a Body mass index [Kg/m2] (n, %)a Underweight Overweight Obese Weight change in the past five years [Kg] (n, %)b Lost Gain Marital status (n; %)c Unmarried Married Other Smoking (n, %)b Current smoker Past smoker Physical activity [METs-h/week] (mean, SD)b Energy intake [Kcal/day] (mean, SD) Alcohol consumption [g/day] (mean, SD)c Working hours (n, %)c < 35 hours/week >= 35 hours/week Unemployed Chronic disease at baseline (n, %) Cardiovascular Cancer 78 (4.2) 42.2 (13.0) Under estimated n = 2,397 82 (3.5) 41.7 (12.4) Over estimated n = 96 1 (1.0) 47.4 (14.8) None n = 3,604 218 (6.0) 34.1 (10.1) Female Body image disturbance Under estimated n = 2,145 108 (5.0) 35.5 (10.4) Over estimated n = 169 10 (5.9) 31.2 (9.1)

58 (3.1) 682 (36.4) 35 (1.9)

0 (0.0) 1202 (50.1) 302 (12.6)

4 (4.2) 4 (4.2) 0 (0.0)

1,259 (34.9) 124 (3.4) 14 (0.4)

0 (0.0) 529 (24.7) 101 (4.7)

148 (87.6) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0)

330 (17.6) 1,064 (56.7) 634 (34.0) 1,171 (62.9) 58 (3.1) 373 (20.6) 633 (34.9) 26.8 (23.7) 2,448.9 (668.0) 10.9 (14.4)

460 (19.2) 1,218 (50.8) 804 (33.8) 1,495 (62.8) 81 (3.4) 469 (20.3) 772 (33.3) 29.6 (27.0) 2,462.5 (663.2) 10.4 (12.6)

13 (13.5) 62 (64.6) 29 (30.5) 66 (69.5) 0 (0.0) 17 (17.9) 38 (40.0) 21.5 (19.6) 2,375.2 (686.1) 12.3 (16.0)

999 (27.7) 1,532 (42.5) 1,968 (55.0) 1,490 (41.6) 122 (3.4) 911 (26.1) 833 (23.9) 21.7 (18.6) 2,320.4 (573.3) 4.0 (5.7)

608 (28.3) 905 (42.2) 1,055 (49.6) 972 (45.7) 99 (4.7) 485 (23.3) 535 (25.7) 21.6 (18.0) 2,299.4 (564.1) 3.8 (5.7)

56 (33.1) 68 (40.2) 107 (64.1) 52 (31.1) 8 (4.8) 41 (25.2) 36 (22.1) 20.3 (15.9) 2,327.4 (610.0) 3.1 (4.0)

196 (10.6) 1,521 (82.1) 135 (7.3)

230 (9.7) 1,978 (83.5) 160 (6.8)

10 (10.5) 74 (77.9) 11 (11.6)

734 (20.6) 2,287 (64.3) 534 (15.0)

442 (20.8) 1,412 (66.5) 269 (12.7)

35 (20.8) 91 (54.2) 42 (25.0)

128 (6.8) 53 (2.8)

148 (6.2) 65 (2.7)

9 (9.4) 6 (6.3)

100 (2.8) 115 (3.2)

73 (3.4) 87 (4.1)

3 (1.8) 3 (1.8)

Standard deviation (SD), a Statistical significant difference in both sexes; b Statistical significant difference for men; c Statistical significant difference for women. The means differences were compared using Analysis of Variance and Tukey's test.

image disturbance and the incidence of depression remained without statistical significance. Table 4 shows the results after restricting the case definition to the medical diagnosis of depression, eliminating the participants who only reported use of antidepressants during follow-up. Among women, underestimation of body size was inversely associated with the incidence of depression after adjusting for age (OR: 0.72, 95% CI: 0.54 0.95), but this relationship was not maintained after adjusting for other possible confounding variables. In figure 2 the categories of body image disturbance in the participants of this study are shown. The proportion of participants who correctly perceived their body size was high (53.3%) and gross misperception was seldom

found, with most cases selecting only one silhouette below (42.7%) or above (2.6%) their actual BMI.

Discussion
The results of our study do not support any association between body image disturbance and incidence of depression. However, our study was not informative for males who overestimated their body size, because we found a very small proportion of males in that category and a single case of incident depression among them. This is in contrast to some results observed by other researchers who examined this topic [8, 10, 16, 17]. However, those studies had a cross sectional design, which does not assure the temporal sequence of the

Page 5 of 9
(page number not for citation purposes)

BMC Public Health 2009, 9:1

http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/9/1

Table 3: Association between body image disturbance and incidence of depressiona in participants of the SUN study according to sex.

Sex Male Body image disturbance None Cases Total OR (95% CI)b OR (95% CI)c OR (95% CI)d 78 1875 1 (ref.) 1 (ref.) 1 (ref.) Underestimated 83 2397 0.83 (0.60 1.13) 0.83 (0.60 1.15) 0.83 (0.60 1.16) Overestimated 1 96 0.24 (0.03 1.78) 0.23 (0.03 1.70) 0.21 (0.03 1.55) None 218 3604 1 (ref.) 1 (ref.) 1 (ref.) Female Body image disturbance Underestimated 108 2145 0.81 (0.64 1.02) 0.84 (0.66 1.07) 0.85 (0.67 1.08) Overestimated 10 169 1.02 (0.53 1.97) 0.81 (0.39 1.69) 0.82 (0.40 1.70)

Odds Ratio (OR); 95% Confidence Interval (95% CI); a Depression was defined as a physician diagnosis or the use of antidepressants drugs; b Odds Ratio of the association between body image disturbance and incidence of depression adjusted for age; c Odds Ratio of the association between body image disturbance and incidence of depression adjusted for age, weight change in the past five years (none, lost, gain), marital status (unmarried, married, other), smoking (never, current smoker, past smoker), physical activity (METs-h/week), energy intake (Kcal/day), alcohol consumption (g/day), working hours (< 35 hours/week, >= 35 hours/week, unemployed), chronic diseases (cardiovascular diseases and cancer) at baseline; d Odds Ratio of the association between body image disturbance and incidence of depression adjusted for the same variables in (c) plus pregnancy and chronic diseases (cardiovascular diseases and cancer) during follow-up.

association investigated. This problem is avoided in our work which has had a longitudinal design. Other studies have shown that depression can lead to body image disturbance [12, 13, 15]. However, the temporal sequence is a potential major limitation of those studies as well, as they also used a cross sectional design. We have no knowledge of any previous prospective study with a large sample and follow-up period that has evaluated the relationship between body image disturbance and depression among adults. One study conducted with ninety-seven patients with binge eating disorders has reported that body image disturbance is a predictive factor of depression [29].

One possible explanation for the lack of association between body image disturbance and incidence of depression in our adult population is the high educational level amongst our studied population. This characteristic may contribute to more accurate self-report of perceived body size. More than 50.0% of the participants correctly estimated their body size and the misperception was mostly limited to only one silhouette below the actual BMI, which can be considered as acceptable. Studies done by our group have shown that participants of this cohort have also correctly selfreported diagnoses for other important characteristics [23, 28, 30, 31]. The lack of association between body image disturbance and incidence of depression in our study could also be

Table 4: Association between body image disturbance and incidence of depressiona in participants of the SUN study according to sex.

Sex Male Body image disturbance None Cases Total OR (95% CI)b OR (95% CI)c OR (95% CI)d 43 1840 1 (ref.) 1 (ref.) 1 (ref.) Underestimated 52 2366 0.94 (0.62 1.41) 0.92 (0.60 1.39) 0.92 (0.60 1.39) Overestimated 0 95 e e e None 163 3549 1 (ref.) 1 (ref.) 1 (ref.) Female Body image disturbance Underestimated 71 2108 0.72 (0.54 0.95) 0.76 (0.57 1.01) 0.77 (0.57 1.02) Overestimated 9 168 1.20 (0.60 2.39) 0.95 (0.43 2.06) 0.96 (0.44 2.09)

Odds Ratio (OR); 95% Confidence Interval (CI 95%);a Depression was defined only as a physician diagnosis, excluding those participants who reported use of antidepressant drugs, n = 160; b Odds Ratio of the association between body image disturbance and depression adjusted for age; c Odds Ratio of the association between body image disturbance and depression adjusted for age, body mass index, weight change in the past five years (none, lost, gain), marital status (unmarried, married, other), smoking (never, current smoker, past smoker), physical activity (METs-h/week), energy intake (Kcal/day), alcohol consumption (g/day), working hours (< 35 hours/week, >= 35 hours/week, unemployed), chronic diseases (cardiovascular diseases and cancer) at baseline; d Odds Ratio of the association between body image disturbance and incidence of depression adjusted for the same variables in (c) plus pregnancy and chronic diseases (cardiovascular diseases and cancer) during follow-up; e Odds Ratio could not be calculated.

Page 6 of 9
(page number not for citation purposes)

BMC Public Health 2009, 9:1

http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/9/1

60,0

50,0

40,0

30,0

20,0

10,0

0,0
underestimated 3 underestimated 2 underestimated 1 correct classification overestimated 1 overestimated 2 overestimated 3

Figure 2 Body image disturbance in participants of the SUN study according to sex. Underestimated 3 = the person who underestimated 3 silhouettes below his/her body mass index; Underestimated 2 = the person who underestimated 2 silhouettes below his/her body mass index; Underestimated 1 = the person who underestimated 1 silhouettes below his/her body mass index; Correct classification = the person who assess correctly his/her body image; Overestimated 1 = the person who overestimated 1 silhouettes above his/her body mass index; Overestimated 2 = the person who overestimated 2 silhouettes above his/ her body mass index; Overestimated 3 = the person who overestimated 3 silhouettes above his/her body mass index.

Other limitations of this study were: (1) Depression was defined using the question, "Have you ever been diagnosed with depression by a health professional?" However, this question has been validated with this cohort by our group in previous research. In that study a self-reported physician-made diagnosis of depression was validated in our cohort using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (SCID-I) applied by blinded experienced psychiatrists as the Gold Standard (submitted article). Other studies applied questionnaires for diagnosing depressive symptoms, particularly the Beck Depression Inventory [39]; (2) Unfortunately, we did not asses variables such as family history of depression or adverse life events which might impact on the incidence of depression [40-42]; (3) The differences between the participants and non-participants of this study could also influence our results. Despite not being the initial objective of our study, it is important to highlight some secondary results that we observed. Men who underestimated their body size were those with higher rates of overweight and obesity. Among women, those who overestimated their body size had higher rates of underweight. These findings are consistent with the theory already presented in the introduction of this article which asserts that the aesthetic standards typical of Western cultures can influence body image disturbance [8, 9]. Women want to lose weight, despite leanness, a fact which may contribute to the occurrence of anorexia and bulimia [43, 44]. Men wish to gain muscle mass, despite having anthropometric standards within the normal range, which is contributing to the occurrence of muscle dysmorphia [45].

explained because we considered the difference between BMI and the silhouettes proposed by Stunkard et al. (1983) [32] as a proxy of body image disturbance, which does not accurately evaluate this outcome. Other studies applied questionnaires to measure the degree of contentment with physical appearance, such as the Body Satisfaction Scale [33], the Body Image Avoidance Questionnaire [34], the Selves Questionnaire [35] and the Multidimensional Body Self-Questionnaire [36]. Nevertheless, a major concern in the assessment of body image has been the apparent failure to recognize the complexity of the body image construct. There have been important advancements in the development of standardized body image measurement tools in recent years. However, it would be premature to assume that any of these methods assesses body image in its entirety [37]. It has been proposed that the body image disturbance is not due to any perceptual deficit, but is based on cognitive-evaluative dissatisfaction [38]. Furthermore, some authors have used body image disturbance and body image dissatisfaction as synonyms and these terms do not have the same meaning [29].

Conclusion
We conclude that no association was found between body image disturbance and the incidence of depression in participants of the SUN study. Other longitudinal studies among adults should be conducted to confirm our results.

Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions
AMP carried out the statistical analysis, drafted the manuscript and gave final approval of the version to be published. ASV was involved in drafting the manuscript, revised it critically for important intellectual content and gave final approval of the version to be published.

Page 7 of 9
(page number not for citation purposes)

BMC Public Health 2009, 9:1

http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/9/1

MBR made substantial contributions to analysis and interpretation of data, was involved in drafting the manuscript, revised it critically for important intellectual content and gave final approval of the version to be published. CNL was involved in drafting the manuscript, revised it critically for important intellectual content and gave final approval of the version to be published. MAGM made substantial contributions to conception and design, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation of data; was involved in drafting the manuscript, revised it critically for important intellectual content and gave final approval of the version to be published.

12.

13. 14. 15.

16. 17. 18. 19. 20.

Acknowledgements
We thank all members of the SUN Study Group for administrative, technical and material support. We thank participants of the SUN Study for continued cooperation and participation. The SUN Study has received funding from the Spanish Ministry of Health (Grants PI030678, PI040233, PI070240, RD06/0045, and G03/140), the Navarra Regional Government (PI141/2005) and the University of Navarra. The SUN Study has received funding from the Spanish Ministry of Health (Grants PI030678, PI040233, P1070240, RD06/0045, and G03/140), the Navarra Regional Government (PI141/2005) and the University of Navarra. AMP also likes to thank the Coordenao de Aperfeioamento de Pessoal de Nvel Superior CAPES, Brazil by the concept of a scholarship for studies at the University of Navarra, Spain.

21. 22. 23.

24.

References
1. 2. Posavac SS and Posavac HD: Predictors of women's concern with body weight: the roles of perceived self-media ideal discrepancies and self-esteem. Eat Disord 2002, 10:15360. Benninghoven D, Raykowski L, Solzbacher S, Kunzendorf S and Jantschek G: Body images of patients with anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa and female control subjects: a comparison with male ideals of female attractiveness. Body Image 2007, 4:5159. De Panfilis C, Cero S, Torre M, Salvatore P, Dall'Aglio E, Adorni A and Maggini C: Changes in body image disturbance in morbidly obese patients 1 year after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding. Obes Surg 2007, 17:792799. Fisak B Jr, Tantleff-Dunn S and Peterson RD: Personality information: does it influence attractiveness ratings of various body sizes?. Body Image 2007, 4:213217. Kittler JE, Menard W and Phillips KA: Weight concerns in individuals with body dysmorphic disorder. Eat Behav 2007, 8:115120. Rudiger JA, Cash TF, Roehrig M and Thompson JK: Day-to-day body-image states: prospective predictors of intra-individual level and variability. Body Image 2007, 4:19. Salbach H, Klinkowski N, Pfeiffer E, Lehmkuhl U and Korte A: Body image and attitudinal aspects of eating disorders in rhythmic gymnasts. Psychopathology 2007, 40:388393. Friedman KE, Reichmann SK, Costanzo PR and Musante GJ: Body image partially mediates the relationship between obesity and psychological distress. Obes Res 2002, 10:3341. Keel PK, Mitchell JE, Davis TL and Crow SJ: Relationship between depression and body dissatisfaction in women diagnosed with bulimia nervosa. Int J Eat Disord 2001, 30:4856. Muennig P, Jia H, Lee R and Lubetkin E: I Think Therefore I Am: Perceived Ideal Weight as a Determinant of Health. Am J Public Health 2008, 98:501506. Cafri G and Thompson JK: Evaluating the convergence of muscle appearance attitude measures. Assessment 2004, 11:224229.

25.

26.

3.

27.

4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11.

28.

29. 30.

31. 32.

33.

Dunkley DM and Grilo CM: Self-criticism, low self-esteem, depressive symptoms, and over-evaluation of shape and weight in binge eating disorder patients. Behav Res Ther 2007, 45:139149. Hrabosky JI and Grilo CM: Body image and eating disordered behavior in a community sample of Black and Hispanic women. Eat Behav 2007, 8:106114. Jansen A, Smeets T, Martijn C and Nederkoorn C: I see what you see: the lack of a self-serving body-image bias in eating disorders. Br J Clin Psychol 2006, 45(Pt 1):123135. Rotenberg KJ, Taylor D and Davis R: Selective mood-induced body image disparagement and enhancement effects: are they due to cognitive priming or subjective mood?. Int J Eat Disord 2004, 35:317332. Veale D, Kinderman P, Riley S and Lambrou C: Self-discrepancy in body dysmorphic disorder. Br J Clin Psychol 2003, 42(Pt 2):157 169. Wardle J, Waller J and Rapoport L: Body dissatisfaction and binge eating in obese women: the role of restraint and depression. Obes Res 2001, 9:778787. World Health Organization: World Health Report 2003: Shaping the Future. Geneva 2003. World Health Organization: Mental Health: Facing the Challenges, Building Solutions: report from the WHO European Ministerial Conference of Helsinki. Copenhagen 2005. ESEMeD/MEDHEA 2000: Prevalence of mental disorders in Europe: results from the European Study of Epidemiology of Mental Disorders (ESEMeD) project. Acta Psych Scand 2004, 109(Suppl 420):164. Segu-Gmez M, de la Fuente C, Vzquez Z, de Irala J and MartnezGonzlez MA: Cohort profile: the 'Seguimiento Universidad de Navarra' (SUN) study. Int J Epidemiol 2006, 35:14171422. World Health Organization: Obesity preventive and managing the global epidemiology. Report of a WHO consultation on Obesity. Geneva 1998. Bes-Rastrollo M, Prez JR, Snchez-Villegas A, Alonso A and Martnez-Gonzlez MA: Validacin del peso e ndice de masa corporal auto-declarados de los participantes de una cohorte de graduados universitarios. Rev Esp Obes 2005, 3:352358. Stunkard A: Old and new scales for assessment of body image. Percept Mot Skills 2000, 90(3 Pt 1):930. McElhone S, Kearney JM, Giachetti I, Zunft HF and Martinez JA: Body image perception in relation to recent weight changes and strategies for weight loss in a nationally representative sample in the European Union. Public Health Nutr 1999, 2 (1A):143151. Martn-Moreno JM, Boyle P, Gorgojo L, Maisonneuve P, FernandezRodriguez JC, Salvini S and Willett WC: Development and validation of a food frequency questionnaire in Spain. Int J Epidemiol 1993, 22:512519. Ainsworth BE, Haskell WL, Whitt MC, Irwin ML, Swartz AM, Strath SJ, O'Brien WL, Bassett DR Jr, Schmitz KH, Emplaincourt PO, Jacobs DR Jr and Leon AS: Compendium of physical activities: an update of activity codes and MET intensities. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2000, 32(9 Suppl):S498S504. Martnez-Gonzlez MA, Lpez-Fontana C, Varo JJ, Snchez-Villegas A and Martnez JA: Validation of the Spanish version of the physical activity questionnaire used in the Nurses' Health Study and Health Professionals' Follow-up Study. Public Health Nutr 2005, 8(7):920927. Masheb RM and Grilo CM: The nature of body image disturbance in patients with binge eating disorder. Int J Eat Disord 2003, 33:33341. Alonso A, Beunza JJ, Delgado-Rodrguez M and MartnezGonzlez MA: Validation of self reported diagnosis of hipertensin in a cohort of university graduates in Spain. BMC Public Health 2005, 5:94. Alonso A, Laguna S and Sequ-Gmez M: A comparison of information on motor vehicle crashes as reported by written or telephone interviews. Inj Prev 2006, 12:117120. Stunkard AJ, Sorensen T and Schulsinger F: Use of the Danish adoption register for the study of obesity and thinness.New York: Raven Press: Kety SS, Rowland LP, Sidman SW, Mathysee SW 1983, 115120. Rapoport L, Clark M and Wardle J: Evaluation of a modified cognitive-behavioural programme for weight management. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2000, 24:17261737.

Page 8 of 9
(page number not for citation purposes)

BMC Public Health 2009, 9:1

http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/9/1

34. 35. 36. 37. 38.

39. 40. 41.

42. 43.

44.

45.

Rosen JC, Srebnik D, Saltzberg E and Wendt S: Development of a body image avoidance questionnaire. Psychol Assessment 1991, 3:3237. Higgins ET: Self-discrepancy: A theory relating self and affect. Psychological Review 1987, 94:319340. Cash TF: The Multidimensional Body-Self Relations Questionnaire User's Manual.Norfolk, VA: Old Dominion University; 1994. Garner DM, Garfinkel PE and Bonato DP: Body image measurement in eating disorders. Adv Psychosom Med 1987, 17:11933. Skrzypek S, Wehmeier PM and Remschmidt H: Body image assessment using body size estimation in recent studies on anorexia nervosa. A brief review. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2001, 10:21521. Beck AT, Steer RA and Garbin M: Psychometric properties of the Beck Depression Inventory: Twenty five years of evaluation. Clin Psychol Rev 1988, 8:77100. Ferrando SJ and Freyberg Z: Treatment of depression in HIV positive individuals: A critical review. Int Rev Psychiatry 2008, 20:6171. Akechi T, Okuyama T, Sugawara Y, Nakano T, Shima Y and Uchitomi Y: Major depression, adjustment disorders, and post-traumatic stress disorder in terminally ill cancer patients: associated and predictive factors. J Clin Oncol 2004, 22:19571965. Rudisch B and Nemeroff CB: Epidemiology of comorbid coronary artery disease and depression. Biol Psychiatry 2003, 54:227240. Fernandez-Aranda F, Pinheiro AP, Tozzi F, Thornton LM, Fichter MM, Halmi KA, Kaplan AS, Klump KL, Strober M, Woodside DB, Crow S, Mitchell J, Rotondo A, Keel P, Plotnicov KH, Berrettini WH, Kaye WH, Crawford SF, Johnson C, Brandt H, La Via M and Bulik CM: Symptom profile of major depressive disorder in women with eating disorders. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 2007, 41:2431. Pagoto S, Bodenlos JS, Kantor L, Gitkind M, Curtin C and Ma Y: Association of major depression and binge eating disorder with weight loss in a clinical setting. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2007, 15:25572559. Pope HG Jr, Gruber AJ, Choi PY, Olivardia R and Phillips KA: Muscle dysmorphia: an underrecognized form of body dysmorphic disorder. Psychosomatics 1997, 38:548557.

Pre-publication history
The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/9/1/prepub

Publish with Bio Med Central and every scientist can read your work free of charge
"BioMed Central will be the most significant development for disseminating the results of biomedical researc h in our lifetime."
Sir Paul Nurse, Cancer Research UK

Your research papers will be:

available free of charge to the entire biomedical community peer reviewed and published immediately upon acceptance cited in PubMed and archived on PubMed Central yours you keep the copyright
Submit your manuscript here:
http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/publishing_adv.asp

BioMedcentral

Page 9 of 9
(page number not for citation purposes)