Editorialnotes
Editorialnotes
Editorialnotes
Writing an Editorial
1 of 3
Editorials have:
1. 2. 3. 4. an introduction, a body and a conclusion (like other news stories). an objective explanation of the issue. This is especially important with complex issues. a timely news angle. opinions from the opposing viewpoint that directly address the same issues the writer addresses. 5. the opinions of the writer delivered in a professional manner. Good editorials engage issues, not personalities and refrain from name-calling or other petty tactics of persuasion. 6. alternative solutions to the problem or issue being criticized. Anyone can gripe about a problem, but a good editorial should take a pro-active approach to making the situation better by using constructive criticism and giving solutions. 7. a solid and concise conclusion that powerfully summarizes the writers opinion. Give it some punch.
Writing an Editorial
2 of 3
Writing an Editorial
1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Pick a significant topic that has a current news angle and will interest readers. Collect information and facts; include objective reporting; do research. State your opinion briefly in a thesis statement. Objectively explain the issue as a reporter would and tell why this situation is important. Give the opposing viewpoint first supported by quotations and facts. Refute (reject) the other side and develop your case using facts, details, figures and quotations. Pick apart the other sides logic. 7. Concede a point of the opposition they must have some good points you can acknowledge that would make you look rational. 8. Repeat key phrases to reinforce an idea. 9. Give a realistic solution(s) to the problem that goes beyond common knowledge. Encourage critical thinking and pro-active reaction. 10. Wrap it up in a concluding punch that restates your opening remark (thesis statement). 11. Limit your editorial to 500 words; make every word count; never use I.
A Sample Structure
I. Lead with an objective explanation of the issue/controversy Include the five Ws and the H. Pull in facts and quotations from the relevant sources. Additional research may be necessary. II. Present your opposition first As the writer you disagree with these viewpoints. Identify the people (specifically those who oppose you). Use facts and quotations to objectively state their opinions. Give a strong position for the opposition. You gain nothing in refuting a weak position. III. Directly refute the oppositions beliefs You can begin your article with transition. Pull in other facts and quotations from people who support your position. Concede a valid point to the opposition which will make you appear rational, that is, one who has considered all the options. IV. Give other, original reasons/analogies Begin defending your position with strong supporting reasons and build up to your strongest reason. Use a literary or cultural allusion that lends to your credibility and perceived intelligence. For example, We should render unto Caesar that which belongs to him. V. Conclude with some punch Give solutions to the problem or challenge the reader to be informed. A quotation can be effective, especially if it is from a respected source. A rhetorical question can be an effective concluder as well.
Writing an Editorial
3 of 3
Editorial Structure
Catch attention: Begin with a general statement which does not include the writer's stand on the controversy. Be careful; dont make it too obvious. It should be creative, thoughtful and specific. Concede: After stating thesis, recognize strongest opposing argument.
Commit: The lead should flow naturally into the thesis, or stance, taken by the editorial.
Convince: Build on your last point by making an even stronger point. Be sure points are backed by facts and examples.
Clinch: Save the strongest argument for last. This discourages rebuttal and leaves the reader with something convincing to ponder.
Cap it off: Leave the reader with a little something extra: a vision of the future, a revisit to the lead, a call to action, etc.
A final note: While professional editorial writers use many different structures, this model serves the beginning writer well. Its principles are solid. After the writer gets more experience, he/she will discover ways to vary the structure depending on the topic and approach. (Source: Alan Weintraut, Annandale High School)