The document discusses several special needs populations in prisons, including those with mental illnesses, substance abuse issues, and medical conditions. It focuses on two specific programs: the Federal Bureau of Prisons' 500-hour residential drug treatment program, which treats drug addiction separately from the general prison population; and a containment model for managing sex offenders through individualized case management, multidisciplinary collaboration, consistent public policy, and quality control. Properly treating and managing these special needs populations is important to comply with civil rights guidelines, but also presents challenges for prison administration.
The document discusses several special needs populations in prisons, including those with mental illnesses, substance abuse issues, and medical conditions. It focuses on two specific programs: the Federal Bureau of Prisons' 500-hour residential drug treatment program, which treats drug addiction separately from the general prison population; and a containment model for managing sex offenders through individualized case management, multidisciplinary collaboration, consistent public policy, and quality control. Properly treating and managing these special needs populations is important to comply with civil rights guidelines, but also presents challenges for prison administration.
The document discusses several special needs populations in prisons, including those with mental illnesses, substance abuse issues, and medical conditions. It focuses on two specific programs: the Federal Bureau of Prisons' 500-hour residential drug treatment program, which treats drug addiction separately from the general prison population; and a containment model for managing sex offenders through individualized case management, multidisciplinary collaboration, consistent public policy, and quality control. Properly treating and managing these special needs populations is important to comply with civil rights guidelines, but also presents challenges for prison administration.
The document discusses several special needs populations in prisons, including those with mental illnesses, substance abuse issues, and medical conditions. It focuses on two specific programs: the Federal Bureau of Prisons' 500-hour residential drug treatment program, which treats drug addiction separately from the general prison population; and a containment model for managing sex offenders through individualized case management, multidisciplinary collaboration, consistent public policy, and quality control. Properly treating and managing these special needs populations is important to comply with civil rights guidelines, but also presents challenges for prison administration.
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 6
PRISONERS WITH SPECIAL NEEDS 1
Prisoners with Special Needs
Kimberly Washburn CJA/234 September 27, 2012 Edward C. Ley PRISONERS WITH SPECIAL NEEDS 2
Prisoners with Special Needs In this paper will be discussed as to how do special needs, mentally ill, and substance- abusing prisoners affect the jail and prison systems at state and federal levels? Also the topic of what would happen if these prisoners were not cared for properly? A special offender population will be chosen and it will be discussed as the program aimed to assist or care for that population. What are the characteristics of this program will be covered. With how the program affected the special offender population in that prison will also be covered? The residential drug program that operates within the prison is the Federal Bureau of Prisons drug abuse program it has separate units in numerous prisons that has staffing, structure, length of treatments, and programs that are provided to deal with the addictions. All inmates have to participant in the 500- hour program as well as reside in a treatment unit, which is separate from the prison general inmate population. This program requires the offenders to assume responsibility for their behavior and to make a conscious decision to avoid engaging in drug taking or criminal behavior. Evidence has proven that these types of programs are effective in both reducing drug use and recidivism. It helps them acquire positive life skills and have a physical wellbeing, and build family relationships. It is also supplemented by other programs that help complement it such as education, work skills training, recreation, disease prevention, and health promotion instruction (Seiter, 2011, p 285). There was estimated in midyear of 2005, that there were 1,255,700 offenders in state and federal prisons and local jails representing 56% of state prisoners, 45% of federal prisoners, and 64% of local jail offenders that had mental health problems (Seiter, 2011, p 287). Inmates are screened for mental illness when they are sent to prison. Treatment for the mentally ill in the prison will fall generally into one of three categories: First- screening the inmates at intake for mental health conditions, Second therapy or counseling for the inmates, and Third- psychotropic medications. In the prisons, the responsibility of assessing and the treating of the mentally ill inmates falls on the correctional psychologists. Mentally ill inmates are more common to have or display disciplinary problems while in prison. The mentally ill offenders are not only a problem to manage while in prison or under community supervision; they are also the most likely to recidivate than any other offenders. It is a difficult challenge in managing the mentally ill offenders in both the community and in the prison. Typical punishment does not deter the offenders like it does for the non-mentally ill inmates. Though they may receive longer prison sentence for the crimes, they may not be able to use the punishment as an incentive for them to discontinue their criminal activities. Even thou they are supervised when in the community, their ability not to recidivate in not a result of a simple decision not to, it is the results more so of their inability to manage themselves. It is difficult for them to maintain the use of their psychotropic medication, or to deal with the responsibility of the problems regarding housing, employment or relationships. For the older inmates there are several issues the prisons have to deal with, such as more expense for the increase for the health care needs. Because the elderly people require more medical care, it costs three times more for those incarcerated. Most have illnesses and general health problems that result from the aging process as well as their years of risky lifestyle choices, such as the use of tobacco use, extensive drug, and alcohol use, and high risk sexual behavior (Seiter, 2011, p 291). With the older inmates not able to be assigned to most work details that they have difficulty getting around, though, the prison as well as the housing and bed arrangements often cause problems. This all comes to the prison administrators need to protect the older inmates from being victimized by younger and stronger predators, who find that older inmates are easy victims from whom they can steal or extort money. Prison officials are continuously challenged with finding solutions to these problems, which do not have any easy or clear answers. To help remedy some of these problems, most prisons make allowances in standard policies for cell and bed assignment, or even for the inmate movement, by letting the older inmates begin moving from one building to another before the younger inmates. There are correctional agencies that even use entire prisons or housing units to house the older inmates and create counseling programs and recreation that meets their needs. Prisons also try to identify the specific jobs that can be done by the older inmates as well as have recreation departments create leisure activities like stretching classes or game table tournaments also to occupy these inmates and to meet their special needs. Inmates that may have diseases such as HIV/AIDS, Tuberculosis (TB), or Hepatitis C, the prison has serious problem with these issues. Because these cause problems as far as trying to avoid other inmates from being infected as well as the staffs safety in not becoming infected. When an inmate is found to have any of these diseases they have to be put in isolation in the prison hospital or somewhere so that they do not infect others. Then there is the issue of them being able to receive treatments. If the prisons did not take care or provide for the special need inmates of all the above mentioned, the prisons would be under violation of most state and federal guidelines that have been set by the government for the prisoners civil rights. That is why it is such a major issue for the prisons to make sure that they provide for those that have special needs, and that they stay in compliance with the rules that govern the inmates civil rights. Sex offenders present a difficult challenge for management in both the community and institutional settings. Reason being is not all sex offenders share similar characteristics, and the proven most effective management and treatment comes from creating a program that relates to the individual characteristics of each of the offenders (Seiter, 2011, p 301). A National Institute of Justice did a survey of state supervision of sex offenders in the community and could identify a five part containment process that seeks to hold offenders accountable through the combined use of both offenders internal controls and external control measures (Seiter, 2011, p 302) It is called the containment model uses a triangle of supervision, treatment to teach the sex offenders to develop internal control, over things such as their thoughts, surveillance to help control the offenders external behaviors as well as help monitor conformance to, the treatment plans, and the supervision conditions. The five components for the model are listed below: 1. The philosophy and goal of the community and victim safety. 2. To individualize case management systems of the sex offender that the specific containment is tailored to the needs of the sex offender. 3. The multidisciplinary approaches of collaboration among the teams of law enforcement, probation and parole, the treatment providers, and the prison personnel to all manage the offender. 4. Consistent public policies that reflect the latest knowledge regarding the effective management of the sex offenders. 5. A quality control component that can monitor whether the policies are being implemented as they are intended and that they are producing the desired effect.
Reference Seiter, R. (2011). Corrections: An Introduction (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Prentice Hall.