This document defines and discusses the concept of a contestable market. A contestable market is one where there is free entry and exit of firms, with low or zero sunk costs. For a market to be perfectly contestable, sunk costs would be zero and new and incumbent firms would face similar costs, eliminating any competitive advantage of incumbents. The theory is that even without actual new entry or competition, the mere threat of entry and exit is enough to force firms to behave efficiently and not abuse their market power. Making markets more contestable is one way to promote competition without direct government intervention.
This document defines and discusses the concept of a contestable market. A contestable market is one where there is free entry and exit of firms, with low or zero sunk costs. For a market to be perfectly contestable, sunk costs would be zero and new and incumbent firms would face similar costs, eliminating any competitive advantage of incumbents. The theory is that even without actual new entry or competition, the mere threat of entry and exit is enough to force firms to behave efficiently and not abuse their market power. Making markets more contestable is one way to promote competition without direct government intervention.
This document defines and discusses the concept of a contestable market. A contestable market is one where there is free entry and exit of firms, with low or zero sunk costs. For a market to be perfectly contestable, sunk costs would be zero and new and incumbent firms would face similar costs, eliminating any competitive advantage of incumbents. The theory is that even without actual new entry or competition, the mere threat of entry and exit is enough to force firms to behave efficiently and not abuse their market power. Making markets more contestable is one way to promote competition without direct government intervention.
This document defines and discusses the concept of a contestable market. A contestable market is one where there is free entry and exit of firms, with low or zero sunk costs. For a market to be perfectly contestable, sunk costs would be zero and new and incumbent firms would face similar costs, eliminating any competitive advantage of incumbents. The theory is that even without actual new entry or competition, the mere threat of entry and exit is enough to force firms to behave efficiently and not abuse their market power. Making markets more contestable is one way to promote competition without direct government intervention.
Contestability is not only about barriers to entry but also about the ease of exit from the industry In a perfectly contestable market sunk costs would be zero Contestability is not necessarily about minimising all barriers; it is more about existing and new firms facing similar costs so incumbent firms have no competitive advantage over new entrants
The theory is that new entrants and competition is not necessary to make firms behave in ways which maximise welfare (productive efficiency working at bottom of ATC curve, allocative efficiency where AR=MC) all that is needed is the THREAT of new entrants
Therefore making markets more contestable is one way to combat the abuse of market power Contestable Market: where there is free entry and free exit of other firms Example Oxford Walking Tours Contestable Market: where there is free entry and free exit of other firms
Ease of exit sunk costs
Similar costs for new entrants and incumbents New entrant Incumbent response Diagram: Extreme Contestability Perfect Contestability: unlikely in reality, but close to is achievable
Imperfect competition downward sloping D curve
Resembles perfect competition productive and allocative efficiency is achieved
Normal profits are made AR=AC
There is no need for the government to intervene in this market efficiency is achieved through contestability! Sunk Costs: sunk costs are retrospective (past) costs that have already been incurred and cannot be recovered e.g. advertising Hit and Run Entry: where new firms enter the industry, cream off some of the supernormal profits of the incumbents and then exit Key Definitions