Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

MPS-Jul-2014-Eng 1 PDF

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 41

MONETARY POLICY STATEMENT

July 2014

16

111

14

104

12

97

10

90

83

76

69

62

0
Jul-07

Jul-08

Jul-09
Jul-10
SBP net liquid reserves

Jul-11

Jul-12
Jul-13
Interbank rate (rhs)

The shaded parts correspond to IMF programs

STATE BANK OF PAKISTAN

55
Jul-14

PKR/US$

billion $

SBP Foreign Exchange Reserves and Exchange Rate

Monetary Policy Statement, July 2014

Contents
Executive Summary

I.

Economic Environment during H2-FY14

A. Global Developments

B. Domestic Developments

Recent Economic Developments and Outlook

A. Short Term Interest Rates: Reinforcing Improved Market


Sentiments

II.

III.

B. Monetary Expansion: Receding Due to Lower Government


Borrowings Amid Rising Private Sector Credit

13

C. Fiscal Deficit: Curtailed and Supported by Increased External


Finance

19

D. External Sector: Increasing Financial Inflows and Rising Reserves

22

E. Economic Growth: Sustainability of Recovery Requires


Additional Reforms

26

F. Inflation: Moderate at a Single Digit Level

29

Concluding Remarks

31

List of Acronyms

34

Monetary Policy Statement, July 2014

List of Tables
Table 1:
Table 2:
Table 3:
Table 4:
Table 5:
Table 6:
Table 7:

Treasury Investments by Banks


Monetary Aggregates
Private Sector Credit
Financial Indicators of Selected Industries
Summary of Consolidated Fiscal Operations
Balance of Payments Summary
Average Inflation

12
14
15
16
20
23
29

List of Figures
Figure 1:
Figure 2:
Figure 3:
Figure 4:
Figure 5:
Figure 6:
Figure 7:
Figure 8:
Figure 9:
Figure 10:
Figure 11:
Figure 12:
Figure 13:
Figure 14:
Figure 15:
Figure 16:
Figure 17:

Interest Rate Corridor and SBPs Liquidity Provisions


Exchange Rate, Market Nostros and Trade Financing
Market and Retail Interest Rates
Yield Curves and Average Term Spreads
Contribution in Broad Money Growth
Government Borrowings and Composition of Fiscal Deficit
Financing from the Banking System
Average Annual Growth in Monetary Aggregates
Stock of Net Foreign Assets of SBP
Real Deposit Growth and Real Returns
Trend in Energy Subsidies
SBP Reserves and Exchange Rate
Growth in Effective Exchange Rate
Oil Imports
Real GDP Growth
Average Electricity Load Management
Investment Expenditure
Target vs. Actual CPI Inflation

9
10
11
12
13
13
14
17
18
21
23
24
24
26
26
27
29

Executive Summary
1.
Economic conditions are certainly better at the beginning of FY15 than a year
ago. The foreign exchange reserves held by SBP are considerably higher accompanied
by stability in the foreign exchange market. Growth in broad money is contained due
to deceleration in governments budgetary borrowings from the banking system.
Inflation remains in single digits and private sector credit is picking up along with
moderate economic recovery. Accordingly, SBP maintained the policy rate at 10
percent during H2-FY14; it was last increased in November 2013.
2.
A detailed assessment of the economy, however, indicates that challenges
and vulnerabilities remain. Continuation of prudent policies and reforms are needed
to build-on positive developments and to achieve protracted stability. For instance,
only comprehensive tax reforms can reduce the fiscal deficit and keep broad money
(M2) expansion within safe limits on enduring basis. Similarly, energy sector reforms
can not only provide critical impetus to economic growth but also help reduce import
bill and thus ease pressure on the balance of payments position.
3.
On its part, SBP is effectively managing market sentiments by supplementing
the monetary policy stance with calibrated liquidity operations in the interbank
market. Apart from anchoring inflation expectations, this has contributed in
achieving stability in the foreign exchange market and in building foreign exchange
reserves. This has also facilitated the shift in banks investment from T-bills to PIBs,
which has improved domestic debt maturity profile and reduced the roll-over risk for
the government.
4.
Specifically, despite significant injections by SBP, appetite for liquidity
remained sufficiently high in the market. As a result, short-term interest rates
remained on the higher side, making rupee liquidity more expensive. This reduced
pressure on exchange rate as it discouraged speculative holdings of foreign exchange
and made trade financing through foreign currency deposits held by banks more
attractive. To contain growth in SBPs Net Domestic Assets (NDA) and reserve money,
SBP will continue to monitor liquidity conditions in the market.
5.
Nevertheless, year-on-year growth in M2 has decelerated to 12.5 percent by
end-June 2014 the lowest rate of monetary expansion during last three years. This
was mainly due to a significant reduction in government borrowings for budgetary
support from the banking system. Specifically, the government borrowed Rs303

Monetary Policy Statement, July 2014

billion from the banking system during FY14; around 21 percent of Rs1446 billion
borrowed in FY13. Lower borrowing and subsequent deceleration in broad money,
projected to be around 12.9 percent in FY15, are contributing towards low
inflationary expectations.
6.
The lower demand for credit by the government also provided necessary
space to the private sector to borrow from the banking system. Given a stable
monetary policy stance along with improving macroeconomic conditions, private
sector credit has increased by Rs328.9 billion during July-May, FY14 highest in last
six years. A majority of this increase was availed for working capital though an
amount of Rs83.2 billion was also utilized for fixed capital formation.
7.
Going forward, an analysis of financial indicators of major industries along
with persistent energy shortages and deteriorating security conditions hint towards
some risks to credit demand. However, given robust profitability, asset quality, and
capital adequacy of the banking sector a reasonable supply of credit by banks can be
expected. Envisaged lower government borrowings from banks also support this
assessment. Nevertheless, deposit growth of 12.6 percent in FY14 needs to be
improved.
8.
Sustainability of lower government borrowings from the banking system,
including SBP, is contingent upon further reduction in the fiscal deficit and
continuation of external financing. In this context, the government has set a target of
4.9 percent of GDP for the fiscal deficit of FY15; about 0.9 percent below the revised
FY14 estimate of 5.8 percent of GDP. Also, a little over 80 percent of the projected
deficit is envisaged to be financed from external and non banking sources.
9.
From the point of view of monetary policy, evaluation of fiscal position is
important to gauge risks to projected money growth, private sector credit estimates,
and inflation outlook. A major risk to the fiscal position of FY15 is from the revenue
side. In particular, the FBR revenue target of Rs2810 billion looks challenging given
the current narrow tax base. The target for FY14 has been missed despite a
significant growth of 17.5 percent. Moreover, growth in total revenues was due to a
significant increase in non-tax receipts during FY14, which may not be the case in
FY15.
10.
Nonetheless, lower fiscal deficit and increase in external financing in FY14 has
already resulted in slower accumulation of domestic debt. The growth in domestic
2

State Bank of Pakistan

Monetary Policy Statement, July 2014

debt during FY14 has decelerated to 14.5 percent, which is significantly lower than
the average growth of around 27 percent during the last three years. This bodes well
from the point of view of countrys risk perception and could help in attracting
investment in the economy.
11.
The substantial increase in external borrowings since February 2014 have
provided a much needed respite and short term stability to the balance of payments
position. These foreign inflows have resulted in a capital and financial account
surplus of $6.1 billion during Jul-May FY14, which is a marked improvement
compared to a surplus of only $465 million in the corresponding period of last year.
Not only did this surplus comfortably finance the current account deficit of $2.6
billion but has also led to a significant increase in SBPs foreign exchange reserves.
12.
From a low level of $2.8 billion on 7th February 2014, SBPs foreign exchange
reserves have increased to $9.6 billion by 4th July 2014. Similarly, the Net
International Reserves (NIR) also gradually increased, reaching positive 2.7 billion by
end-June 2014 compared to negative 2.4 billion a year earlier a net increase of
$5.1 billion. These developments brought about a fundamental shift in sentiments in
the foreign exchange market from March 2014 onwards. The exchange rate has
stabilized slightly below Rs99 to USD after experiencing significant appreciation.
More recently, on 14th July 2014, Moody's Investors Service has revised the outlook
on Pakistan's foreign currency government bond rating to stable from negative.
13.
The impetus of positive sentiments together with continuation of IMF
program and governments privatization plan is expected to result in further
strengthening of the external position in FY15. Specifically, with current account
deficit projected to remain around 1 percent of GDP in FY15, SBP expects its foreign
exchange reserves to exceed $13 billion by end-June 2015 on the back of continued
financial inflows. The main risks to this assessment are uncertainty over international
oil prices and possible delays in planned foreign inflows.
14.
Sustaining this trend in the medium term, especially in the post IMF program
years, would require additional efforts and reforms. For instance, a trade deficit of
over 6 percent of GDP would need to be curtailed. Improving efficiency and
competitiveness of exports and reducing the share of imported oil in meeting
domestic energy needs are examples of required reforms. A significant recent
appreciation of the Real Effective Exchange Rate (REER) would also need to be

State Bank of Pakistan

Monetary Policy Statement, July 2014

monitored carefully in this context. Similarly, improvement in countrys security


conditions is also critical in attracting non debt creating financial inflows.
15.
Despite challenging security conditions and energy shortages, the real GDP
grew by 4.1 percent in FY14. Encouragingly, this relatively higher growth was led by
recovery in the industrial sector, thanks to better performance of Large Scale
Manufacturing (LSM). However, investment expenditures as a percent of GDP have
declined to 14 percent in FY14, which indicates erosion in economys future
productive capacity.
16.
The average CPI inflation in FY14, 8.6 percent, is in single digits for the second
consecutive year. For FY15, the SBP expects average CPI inflation to remain in the
range of 7.5 percent to 8.5 percent. Other than assuming continuation of current
monetary policy stance, this outlook is supported by (i) continuation of moderate
aggregate demand; (ii) further containment in government budgetary borrowing
from the banking system; and (iii) overall stable outlook of international commodity
prices. However, international oil price uncertainty and unanticipated price shocks
pose risks to the inflation outlook.
17.
In conclusion, the Board of Directors of SBP has decided to keep the policy
rate unchanged at 10.0 percent. Henceforth, the Board has also decided to publish
the summary of minutes of monetary policy proceedings of the Board meeting in
four weeks.

State Bank of Pakistan

Monetary Policy Statement, July 2014

I.

Economic Environment during H2-FY14

A.

Global Developments

1.
Global economic growth prospects remain weak as advance economies,
particularly US and Euro zone, continue to experience slow growth despite corrective
measures. While Japan has exhibited better economic activity, its ability to drive
advance economies growth is contingent upon the success of its structural reforms.
At the same time, emerging economies, after recovering from the recent financial
crisis, are already operating close to their potential. Resultantly, the global economy
is expected to grow slower during 2014. In its latest assessment, the World Bank has
revised its projection for growth in global ouput downwards by 40 bps to 2.8 percent
for 2014.
2.
The US economy experienced slower GDP growth during first quarter of 2014.
This was largely a result of extreme weather conditions that curtailed investment and
exports1. However, market sentiments improved following the suspension of federal
government budget ceiling up until March 2015. Moreover, continued forward
guidance by the Federal Reserve on reducing its asset purchase program kept
financial market volatility at bay.2 This progress in balance sheet adjustment coupled
with consistently improving job markets data is expected to yield an upturn in US
economic growth in the second half of 2014.
3.
On the other hand, amidst low inflation, Euro zone growth continues to
remain subdued. Economic fragilities in peripheral economies remain despite a
pickup in their exports. With a strong euro, these peripheral economies have made
their exports competitive through negligible increases in wages. Financial conditions,
however, have improved in the Euro zone on account of three important
developments. These are: progress in restoration of fiscal discipline in most
economies within the Euro area, establishment of a pan-European banking
supervision regime and substantial monetary easing in June 2014 by the ECB.3
Nevertheless, banking stress would continue to drag economic recovery in the Euro
zone in the medium term.

World Bank (2014), Global Economic Prospects.


Asset purchase program stands at at $35 billion per month from July 2014, down from $75 billion in January 2014.
3
The ECB introduced several monetary easing measure in June including a cut in its benchmark rate to rate from 0.25 to
0.15 percent; a cut in deposit rates for banks from zero to -0.1 percent (to push banks to lend) and a substantial injection
of liquidity and credit easing measures including a Targeted Long Term Refinancing operation (TLTRO).
2

State Bank of Pakistan

Monetary Policy Statement, July 2014

4.
In contrast, Japans economy has shown significant improvement with both
fiscal and monetary stimulus impacting output. A sharp acceleration in consumer and
business spending prior to the implementation of a sales tax hike from April 2014
have helped maintain a broadly stable momentum in economic activity. However,
the prospects of Japans economy following an upward trajectory remain dependent
upon the success of its structural reforms aimed at increasing the potential output.
5.
Broadly, these developments in advanced economies have had a muted effect
on international financial and capital markets. Most emerging market economies
have experienced limited currency and stock market reactions since actual tapering
in the US. A few cases of large depreciations in countries, for example Thailand and
Argentina, however, are mainly a consequence of domestic political developments
and weak macroeconomic fundamentals. Moreover, the regional outlook for these
economies remains dependent upon growth supporting measures by China and a
recovery in global demand for exports.
6.
Nevertheless, capital inflows have in fact rebounded for emerging economies.
Resultantly, currencies like the Brazilian Real and the Indian Rupee are regaining
strength, thereby, reducing pressure on central banks in these emerging economies
to tighten their policy. In addition, recent monetary easing measures taken by the
ECB are expected to further boost these capital inflows as Euro Zone banks have
larger cross-border dealings than those of US and Japanese counterparts. Thus,
emerging market economies remain vulnerable to large spillover effects from
advanced economies, thereby requiring strong macroeconomic fundamentals to
cope with the resulting challenges.
7.
Largely reflecting global growth trends, international commodity prices are
expected to remain subdued in the medium term. World food prices have also
stabilized since March 2014 as global production recovers from adverse weather
conditions. Similarly, international oil price movements are expected to stay within a
narrow band. This is because OPEC production remains comfortable despite geopolitical concerns in Iraq and Syria.4 Resultantly, global inflation outlook remains
benign, which bodes well for Pakistans economy in the shape of stable international
prices.
8.
Moreover, global appetite for higher yields in the face of ample liquidity
improves Pakistans prospects of attracting further capital from international
4

Crude oil prices (SA light) averaged around $107/pbl during H2-FY14.
State Bank of Pakistan

Monetary Policy Statement, July 2014

markets. However, a slower global economic recovery may represent negative


implications for Pakistans trade prospects.
B.

Domestic Developments

9.
During H2-FY14, macroeconomic indicators of Pakistans economy like reserve
level, private sector credit, large scale manufacturing (LSM) and inflation moved in
the right direction. This, along with gains in confidence in the economy which is
reflected in the most recent consumer confidence surveys of SBP,5 allowed SBP to
keep the policy rate unchanged at 10.0 percent.
10.
External account witnessed substantial improvement in H2-FY14. Receipt of
foreign inflows under Pakistan Development Fund (PDF), successful issuance of
Eurobonds after a gap of seven years, inflows from auction of 3G/4G spectrum and
loans from multilateral agencies all added to a surplus in the capital and financial
accounts. Robust growth in workers remittances and Coalition Support Fund (CSF)
inflows helped manage current account deficit as well. Further, relatively low IMF
repayments also eased some of the pressures on SBP reserves in H2-FY14.
11.
Resultantly, the pressure on the balance of payments position eased and SBP
was able to meet the IMFs adjusted Net International Reserves (NIR) target for end
March 2014 through buildup of foreign exchange reserves.6 The stability in foreign
exchange market along with improvement in net foreign assets (NFA) was a natural
consequence of these developments.
12.
On the fiscal front, the government successfully brought down the fiscal
deficit during FY14. The contraction in fiscal deficit primarily came on the back of: i)
substantial increase in non-tax revenues; ii) reduction in energy sector subsidy and
iii) decrease in development outlay of federal and provincial governments.
Furthermore, efforts of fiscal consolidation were also reflected in a slower growth in
total expenditures. The estimated fiscal deficit for FY14 has also been revised
downwards to 5.8 percent of GDP from the budgeted 6.3 percent.
13.
Higher than expected external financing helped in substantially reducing
governments reliance on domestic sources to finance the deficit. Consequently,
5

The Consumer Confidence Index (CCI) for July 2014 is 142.26. Although it is slightly lower than 143.99 observed in May
2014, it is still higher than 141.82 and 133.59 recorded in March and January 2014, respectively.
6
As per provisional estimates, NIR target for June 2014 has also been met.
State Bank of Pakistan

Monetary Policy Statement, July 2014

government borrowing for budgetary support from the banking system witnessed a
sharp decline in H2-FY14. Importantly, the fiscal authority managed to bring down
the stock of borrowings from SBP below the IMF performance criterion ceiling for
end-March 2014. However, the NDA target was missed by a small margin.
14.
Credit to the private sector improved on the back of receding government
borrowings from the banking system. Also, it grew significantly due to pickup in
economic activities, improved market sentiments and better energy availability.
Increase in credit to the private sector was dominated by private sector businesses
and resurgence in consumer financing. Importantly, private sector businesses not
only availed credit for ongoing activities i.e. working capital requirements but also for
expansion purposes i.e. fixed capital.
15.
Led by revival in LSM, real GDP grew by 4.1 percent in FY14, which is the
highest since FY08. Inflation remained in single digit during FY14 despite some
volatility in prices of perishable food items. Worringly though, decline in real
investment expenditure continued in FY14 as well, as it slipped to 14.0 percent of the
GDP from 19.2 percent in FY08; the same was 14.6 percent last year.
16.
On the debt management front, roll-over risk has been reduced as the
government has switched its borrowing to longer term PIBs from shorter term T-Bills.
However, in addition to interest rate risk, it may create potential liquidity pressures
for banks as their resources are invested for longer term compared to their shorter
tenor liabilities.

II.

Recent Economic Developments and Outlook

A.

Short Term Interest Rates: Reinforcing Improved Market Sentiments

17.
To consolidate the improvement in major economic indicators and market
sentiments, SBP kept its reverse repo (policy) rate unchanged at 10.0 percent during
H2-FY14; it was last increased in November 2013. Besides favorable outlook for
inflation, the most significant factor contributing towards this stability in interest
rates is the recent improvements in the external sector.
18.
SBP, cognizant of these developments, is also playing its role in effectively
anchoring market sentiments by supplementing the monetary policy stance with
calibrated liquidity management in the interbank money market. This, in turn, has
8

State Bank of Pakistan

Monetary Policy Statement, July 2014

also contributed towards achieving stability in the foreign exchange market and in
building up of foreign exchange reserves.
19.
Stability in the foreign exchange market is an important component of
effective anchoring of market sentiments. To achieve this, SBP conducted calibrated
liquidity operations in the interbank market post January 2014 monetary policy
decision. Despite significant injections by SBP, appetite for rupee liquidity remained
sufficiently high in the market. Specifically, the average net liquidity injections by SBP
stood at Rs133 billion with an average cover-to-bid ratio of 0.80. 7

billion rupees

percent

20.
Under these tight liquidity Figure 1: Interest Rate Corridor and SBP's Liquidity Provisions
Weekly WA overnight repo
Net OMO injections
conditions banks frequently visited
rate
Net discounting
600
the SBPs overnight reverse repo 10.5 SBP reverse repo rate
10.0
450
facility with demand for hefty
9.5
300
volumes
to
meet
reserve
9.0
150
8.5
requirements and their liquidity
8.0
0
needs.8 Further, to avoid the
7.5
-150
7.0
penalty cost of 50 bps over and
-300
6.5
above the policy rate9, banks bids
SBP
repo
rate
6.0
-450
Jul-13
Jan-14
Jul-14
in the auctions of open market
Jul-13
Jan-14
Jul-14
Source: SBP
operation (OMO) were near or
above the policy rate of 10.0 percent on many occasions. This pattern of bidding was
further reinforced, as SBP at times, set the OMO cut-off rates above the policy rate.10
As a result, the weekly weighted average money market overnight repo rate has
been hovering around 9.5 percent since the January 2014 monetary policy decision.
In fact, about 25 percent of the time, it remained higher than the ceiling of SBPs 250
bps interest rate corridor (Figure 1).
21.
The elevated interbank overnight repo rate in turn kept other short-term
money market rates on the higher side and made rupee liquidity more expensive.
This, in turn, reduced pressure on exchange rate as it discouraged speculative
outflow of foreign exchange and made trade financing through foreign currency
7

As of 11th July 2014, the outstanding net liquidity injections by SBP are Rs106 billion.
On average, market acquired Rs14 and Rs8 billion per visit in the post and pre January 2014 monetary policy decision,
respectively.
9
In case an eligible institution accesses the SBP repo/reverse-repo facilities more than 7 times during a given quarter, a
spread of plus/minus 50bps is applied over and above the applicable SBP Overnight Reverse Repo and Repo Rates,
respectively, for the remainder of the same quarter.
10
For example, out of 24 OMO injections conducted after the January 2014 policy decision, 9 times the OMO cut-off rate
was higher than the prevailing policy rate of 10.0 percent.
8

State Bank of Pakistan

Monetary Policy Statement, July 2014


Figure 2: Exchange Rate, Market Nostros and Trade Financing

Trade financing (Stock)


Market nostros*(Stock)

Interbank rate
Open market rate
113

1800

110

1600

107

1400

104
101
98

million $

PKR/US$

deposits held by banks more


attractive.11 The later trend is
reflected
in
drawdown
of
scheduled banks market nostros
against foreign currency deposits,
and subsequent increase in trade
financing, during the past few
months (Figure 2).

1200
1000
800

95
600
Jul-13
Jan-14
Jul-14
Jun-13
* balances held abroad by domestic banks

Dec-13

Jun-14

22.
By 11th July 2014, PKR has
Source: SBP
appreciated by 6.7 percent against
the USD in the interbank market since January 2014 monetary policy decision.12 This
appreciation is due to a combination of positive sentiments and improvements in the
external sector. For instance, during 17th January to 11th July, 2014, SBP reserves
increased by $6.2 billion on account of various inflows such as issuance of
Eurobonds, CSF proceeds, PDF inflows, sale of licenses of 3G/4G spectrum and net
foreign exchange purchases. These inflows strengthened the balance of payments
position and contributed in improving market sentiments. SBPs monetary policy
stance and associated liquidity management ensured that this virtuous cycle
continues to deliver stability in the foreign exchange market.
23.
Further, improved inflow of foreign exchange in the interbank market and
appreciation of PKR against the USD reinforced each other. The sharp appreciation in
PKR-USD parity encouraged exporters to sell their foreign exchange receipts earlier in
the spot and forward market, which accelerated PKR appreciation. At the same time,
the SBP also reduced its outstanding forward position by $1125 million during
January-May FY14, which also augmented foreign exchange liquidity in the interbank
market.13
24.
Nonetheless, it is important to highlight that most of the recent improvement
in financial account and appreciation of PKR against USD is due to debt creating
flows, and not because of private financial inflows or improvement in the trade

11

When banks lend, for example to exporters, the foreign currency is sold in the interbank market and the rupee
counterpart is provided to the borrower. The return on such loans is typically the LIBOR plus premium reflected by the
swap curve. Loans against foreign currency deposits become attractive if the borrowing cost of rupee loans is higher and
the PKR value remains stable (or it appreciates).
12
Overall, PKR has appreciated by 0.9 percent in FY14.
13
At the end of May 2014, the outstanding forward position stands at $1525 million. The end June 2014 target for the
same is $2150 million under the IMF program. Provisional estimates indicate that this target has also been met.
10

State Bank of Pakistan

Monetary Policy Statement, July 2014

account. A more sustainable solution for stability in the foreign exchange market lies
in the revival of private inflows and reduction in the trade deficit.
25.
Other than contributing towards foreign exchange market stability, higher
short-term rates in the domestic money market, such as the OMO cut-off rates, kept
yields on T-bills of all maturities very close to the policy rate. Historically, as the
government has rarely accepted bids on T-bills above the policy rate so banks
participation in T-bill auctions has declined significantly. As a consequence, fiscal
authority has retired Rs1224 billion worth of T-bills since the January 2014 monetary
policy decision.

percent

basis points

26.
Similarly, the elevated yields Figure 3: Market and Retail Interest Rates
Spread (rhs)
6-month KIBOR
on short-term government papers
WADR
SBP reverse repo rate
WALR
have also kept the corporate
12.0
720
10.3
benchmark rate, i.e. KIBOR, on the
10.0
600
10.0
higher side. Usually, the 6-month
8.0
480
9.7
KIBOR strictly follows the trend in
6.0
360
9.4
14
4.0
240
the policy rate. However, it has
9.1
2.0
120
been showing a positive spread
8.8
0.0
0
over the policy rate and
Jul-13
Jan-14
Jul-14
Jul-13 Dec-13 May-14
consistently hovering around 10.2
Source: SBP
percent since December 2013.
Effect of higher KIBOR can also been seen in higher weighted average lending rate
(WALR) and somewhat increased banking spread (Figure 3). This emerging trend may
negatively influence private investment in future as it will keep real lending rates on
the higher side.
27.
The stable inflation and exchange rate outlook, partly due to slightly higher
interest rates, made longer term investment more attractive for banks for most of
the H2-FY14. Against the target of Rs480 billion in PIB auctions, market offered
Rs1930 billion, out of which fiscal authority accepted Rs1874 billion. The decline in
effective maturity due to reopening of previous issues and lucrative term premium of
around 240 bps (compared to an average 100 bps in the last two fiscal years)
provided enough incentive to attract unprecedented bids in the PIB auctions (Figure

14

During the last three years (July 2010 to December 2013), the average spread has been around negative 11 bps.
State Bank of Pakistan

11

Monetary Policy Statement, July 2014


Figure 4: Yield Curves and Average Term Spreads
14-Mar-14
11-Jul-14

3 year - 6 month
10 year - 6 month

16-May-14

13.5

300

13.0

250
basis points

12.5
percent

4). This shift in banks investment


in PIBs has improved domestic debt
maturity profile and reduced the
roll-over risk for the government.15

12.0

200

1M
3M
6M
1Y
3Y
5Y
7Y
10Y
20Y

150
11.5
28.
The analysis also reveals
11.0
100
that around half of the investment
10.5
50
10.0
in PIBs made during Q3-FY14 is in
0
9.5
the 3-year paper, which roughly
FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14
so far
indicates the horizon of banks
Source: FMA and SBP
view about monetary policy (Table
1). It is interesting to note that the bulk of the fresh investments in PIBs (66 percent)
have been categorized under `Available for Sale bucket which insulates banks profit
and loss account from adverse interest rate movements. However, the interest rate
risk still remains as banks have to revalue these investments and the interest rate
insensitive portion (under Held to Maturity category) is only 33 percent.16

29.
Moreover, significant funding
from PIB auctions helped fiscal
authority to retire borrowings from the
SBP and meet the IMF program target
of Rs2390 billion for end March 2014.
However, despite successful conduct of
recent Sukuk auction17, the provisional
estimates indicate that the end June
2014 target of government borrowings
from SBP has been missed.

Table 1: Treasury Investments by Banks


billion rupees, flows during Q3-FY14
Held for
Trading

Available for
Sale

Held-toMaturity

MTB

60.4

-382.9

-61.4

PIB

7.3

497.7

245.3

3-year

6.3

250.9

131.8

5-year

3.8

140.1

73.7

10-year

-2.8

106.7

39.8

Other

3.8

-41.5

2.3

Total

71.5

73.4

186.3

Source: Unaudited Quarterly Accounts of Banks

30.
Nevertheless, shifting from shorter to longer tenor securities could potentially
enhance banking industrys risk exposure towards future interest rate changes. Thus,
from the perspective of financial stability, SBP is carefully monitoring and analyzing
these important emerging trends.
15

According to latest data up to May 2014, 56 percent of the total outstanding government securities held by banks and
non-banks were in the form of PIBs. The same ratio was 26 percent at the beginning of FY14.
16
In terms of BSD Circulars No. 10 and 14 of 2004 , banks/DFIs are required to classify their investment portfolio as (i) Held
to Maturity (ii) Held for Trading and (iii) Available for Sale. Any surplus/deficit on category (ii) will be charged to profit and
loss account, while any such surplus/deficit on (iii) will be taken to `surplus/deficit on Revaluation of Securities account in
the balance sheet. Securities held under (i) are not required to be revalued.
17
Against the target of Rs49.5 billion, islamic banks offered Rs113.7 billion in the recent Sukuk auction held on 20th June
2014. Despite lucrative offers, government adhered to the target and raised the amount at a cut-off margin of 200 bps
below the latest avaiable weighted average yield on 6-month T-bills.
12

State Bank of Pakistan

Monetary Policy Statement, July 2014

B.
Monetary Expansion: Receding Due to Lower Government Borrowings Amid
Rising Private Sector Credit
31.
The year-on-year growth in Figure 5: Contribution in Broad Money Growth
(in percentage points)
broad money (M2) has decelerated
NFA
NDA
to 12.5 percent in FY14 from 15.9 16.0
percent a year earlier. This is the 12.8
9.6
lowest monetary expansion during
6.4
the last three years, which is
3.2
mainly due to a significant
0.0
deceleration in growth of Net
Domestic Assets (NDA) of the -3.2
Average (FY09-13)
FY14p
banking system (Figure 5). p provisional
Source: SBP
However, part of the impact of this slowdown in NDA was offset by a considerable
expansion in NFA of the banking system during the same period.

billion rupees

32.
Some deceleration in NDA Figure 6: Government Borrowing and Composition of Fiscal Deficit
Financing from the Banking System
Non-bank
of the banking system was
Bank
FY13
FY14p
Fiscal deficit
expected in the second half of
1600
450
cumulative flows
FY14 deficit financing
1400
FY14 as higher external inflows
375
1200
300
starting
in
February
2014
1000
225
substituted part of government
800
150
600
borrowings from the banking
75
400
system. This impact was further
0
200
0
-75
compounded by a relatively lower
Jul Sep Dec Mar Jun*
Q1
Q2
Q3
fiscal deficit and increase in nonp provisional
Source: SBP
bank borrowings that reduced the
governments financing needs from the banking system (Figure 6). Specifically,
government borrowed Rs303 billion for budgetary support from the banking system
during FY14, which is around 21 percent of Rs1446 billion borrowed in FY13 (Table
2).
33.
Other factors that have contributed in the slowdown of government
borrowings from the banking system and thus money creation are the quantitative
limits set under the IMF program. These include the direct impact of ceiling set on
government borrowings from SBP and indirect impact of restrictions on the fiscal
deficit. Historically, because of these limits both reserve money and broad money
have on average grown at a slower pace during the years of IMF programs than years
State Bank of Pakistan

13

Monetary Policy Statement, July 2014

without IMF programs (Figure 7). This


lower
borrowing
and
resultant
deceleration in reserve and broad
money is contributing towards low
inflationary expectations.
34.
With lower financing needs,
government was able to meet the endMarch 2014 net borrowing target of
Rs2390 billion from SBP as agreed in
the IMFs Extended Fund Facility (EFF).
Thereafter, according to provisional
estimates, stock of government
borrowings from SBP (on cash basis)
has increased to Rs2328 billion as on
end June, 2014 compared to IMFs
target of Rs2240 billion. This shows that
the end June 2014 target of
government borrowings from SBP,
agreed with the IMF, has been missed.

Table 2: Monetary Aggregates


stock and flow in billion rupees, growth in percent

NDA: of which
Net budgetary support

June
2013
Stocks

FY13

FY14P

FY151

8589

1479

778

830

Flows during

5246

1446

303

SBP

2213

507

197

Scheduled banks

3033

940

106

Commodity operations

468

32

25

3357

-19

384

288

31

54

269

-263

332

133

-261

357

Private sector credit


Credit to PSEs
NFA
SBP
Scheduled banks

461

136

-2

-25

Money supply (M2)

8858

1216

1110

1291

Reserve money

2535

346

326

369

Currency in circulation

1938

264

240

Total deposits

6909

950

868

Growth (year-on-year)
Net budgetary support

38.1

5.8

Scheduled banks

44.9

3.5

Private sector credit

-0.6

11.4

Money supply (M2)

15.9

12.5

12.9

Reserve money

15.8

12.9

12.9

Currency in circulation

15.8

12.4

15.9
12.6
35.
The lower demand for credit by Total deposits
the government provided necessary P:Provisional; Projections
Source: SBP
space to the private sector to borrow
from the banking system. Given a stable monetary policy stance along with
improving macroeconomic conditions, private sector credit has increased by Rs328.9
billion during July-May, FY14, while
Figure 7: Average Annual Growth in Monetary Aggregates
(during FY78 to FY13)
loans to private sector businesses
IMF program years
Non program years
(PSBs) have increased by Rs275.4 18.0
billion highest in last six years 16.0
(Table 3).18 This welcome rise in 14.0
credit is attributable to uptake by 12.0
10.0
traditional sectors, such as textiles,
8.0
energy and agriculture; and non6.0
traditional sectors, such as, telecom,
4.0
Reserve money
Broad money
beverages, metals, retail trade and
Source: SBP
1

18

As per provisional monetary survey of end June 2014, flow of credit to the private sector is Rs384 billion (Table 2).

14

State Bank of Pakistan

Monetary Policy Statement, July 2014

petroleum products. This upward trend


in credit uptake along with growth in
LSM of 4.3 percent (year-on-year)
during July-April 2014 suggests
continuity in revival of economic
activity.

Table 3: Private Sector Credit


flows; billion rupees
FY13
Jul-May
Total credit to private sector

33.0

328.9

1.Loans to private sector businesses

83.4

275.4

By Type
Working capital

36.
Analysis of loans by type shows
that while a bulk of credit was availed
for working capital, a sizeable amount
was also utilized for capital formation
(Table 3). Credit for long-term
purposes was taken by energy (Rs22.3
billion), telecom (Rs18.6 billion), sugar
(Rs11.2 billion), agriculture (Rs9 billion)
and textiles (Rs7.6 billion). While
telecom sector is investing in
expanding their infrastructure after
obtaining 3G/4G spectrum; energy and
textiles are possibly modernizing and
expanding their production due to
expected higher demand. In addition,
sugar sector is investing in bagasse
based Co-Generation Power Projects.
This suggests some pickup in
investment in the coming year.

FY14

95.9

192.2

-12.5

83.2

Agriculture

18.5

31.8

Manufacturing

Fixed Investment
By Sectors: of which

80.0

168.6

Textiles

43.7

40.5

Chemicals

-5.8

3.7

Food & beverages

30.9

96.4

Sugar
Non-metallic mineral products
Cement
Energy

28.1

45.0

-12.6

-12.9

-12.0

-13.2

6.3

50.3

Construction

-1.2

-3.8

Commerce and trade

-5.1

10.0

-17.2

25.6

Services

-9.8

-2.2

2. Personal

20.5

28.0

15.4

26.7

25.0

17.7

4. NBFC

-84.4

-2.3

5. Others

-11.6

10.2

Transport

Consumer financing
3. Investments

Source: SBP

37.
Along with higher demand by the private sector there has been some decline
in real lending rates in FY14. Real WALR has declined from 3.4 percent in June 2013
to 2.4 percent in May 2014, explaining some of the increase in private sector credit.
Moreover, decline in the risk premium19 by 80bps over the same period indicates
banks increased preference for lending to the private sector during FY14. Further,
the imposition of floor on return on savings deposits may have incentivized banks to
lend to the private sector to maintain their profitability.
38.
The major indicators of industrial sector performance by March 2014,
however, have declined marginally (Table 4). Volatility in exchange rate during FY14
19

Risk Premium equals WALR minus 6-month T-Bill rate.


State Bank of Pakistan

15

Monetary Policy Statement, July 2014

affected the profitability of sectors Table 4: Financial Indicators of Selected Industries*


more open to trade activities. For in percent
Textiles
Cement
Energy
example, the textile sector earned
FY13 FY14 FY13 FY14 FY13 FY14
good profits due to sharp
Gross Profit Margin
14.8
13.2
36.0
35.1
8.1
8.0
depreciation and stable cotton
Operating Margin
12.4
11.4
32.0
28.3
7.8
8.4
prices in the first half of FY14, Net Profit Margin
8.1
7.3
20.6
21.7
4.6
5.1
while PKR appreciation in the Cash Flow to Sales
10.9
10.1
26.2
27.2
5.3
5.7
second half along with falling yarn Cost of Goods Sold to Sales 85.2 86.8 64.0 64.9 91.9 92.0
prices in international market Financial Expenses to Sales 3.3 3.2 5.8 3.8 1.2 1.0
Interest Coverage Ratio
17.8
20.5
13.3
9.3
19.3
18.6
reduced their operating profit Inventory Turnover Ratio
43.6
47.1
7.5
6.4
10.1
11.0
margins. On the other hand, * Up to March 2014; ratios are calculated according to weighted average of
energy sector gained on account of companies
Source: Financial statements of 47 listed Companies
lower fuel costs payable in US
dollars in the second half of FY14. Moreover, increase in tax expenses also affected
corporate profitability. These recent performance indicators of the industry hint that
some risks to credit uptake exist from the demand side.
39.
On the other hand, profitability of the banking sector from core business
activities has remained stable as indicated by net interest margin (NIM) of around
one percent in Q3-FY13 and Q3-FY14. Return on Assets (ROA) and return on equity
(ROE, before taxes) have, however, improved over the same period. This is due to
higher fee based income, gains from foreign currency dealings and lower
provisioning expenses. Further, the non-performing loans (NPLs), both gross as well
as net, show a year-on-year decline in Q3-FY14. Given robust profitability, muted
credit risk and expected lower government borrowings from banks, it is anticipated
that banks would shift from relatively low return investments in government
securities to high return private sector loans.
40.
This potential shift poses some challenges for financial stability of the banking
sector, which indirectly has implications for monetary policy considerations.
Specifically, any switch from zero risk weighted investments in government securities
to higher risk weighted advances would entail additional capital charge and hence
some reduction in the capital adequacy of the banking sector. Particularly, for small
banks with proportionately higher investments to deposit ratio (IDRs), such a
portfolio shift may bring their capital adequacy ratio (CAR) under pressure. Among
other factors, banks temptation to maintain CAR around the current level of 15
percent, may lead to less risk taking and somewhat lower growth in advances.
16

State Bank of Pakistan

Monetary Policy Statement, July 2014

41.
For FY15, SBP expects that the improvements in main macroeconomic
indicators will continue though risk of loss of investor confidence remains.20
Nevertheless, we expect investment and production to continue their upward
trajectory in the coming year. Banks, with satisfactory asset quality and capital
adequacy, are willing to lend. Therefore, considering the recent momentum in credit
uptake in FY14 and expected growth in GDP and LSM, the private sector credit is
expected to grow by 7.6 percent in FY15.
42.
The reversal in Net Foreign
Figure 8: Stock of Net Foreign Assets (NFA) of SBP
(in billion rupees)
Assets of the banking system,
750
specifically of SBP, is another major 600
development
in
monetary 450
aggregates. After continuously 300
contracting for the past two and a 150
0
half years, NFA of SBP has started
to increase since February 2014 -150
(Figure 8). Specifically, the stock of -300
Jun-11 Dec-11 Jun-12 Dec-12 Jun-13 Dec-13 Jun-14p
SBP NFA, which had declined to
p provisional
Source: SBP
negative Rs123.4 billion by end
January 2014, has increased to positive Rs489.5 billion by end June 2014. This
increase is primarily a reflection of a buildup in SBPs foreign exchange reserves on
the back of considerable improvement in financial inflows.
43.
The increase in external inflows and lower government borrowings from the
banking system improved the overall NDA-to-NFA ratio as well. As on 30th June 2014
this ratio has declined to 15.6 from 31.9 a year earlier. This decline in NDA to NFA
ratio is reflective of the fact that the risk of substituting domestic assets with the
foreign assets is now relatively lower, which is a good sign for exchange rate and
inflation outlook.
44.
On the liability side, the growth in currency in circulation (CiC) during the
current year has decelerated to 12.4 percent, which was 15.8 percent last year
(Table 2). The current years lower growth in CiC is in line with lower government
borrowings from SBP. Additionally, lower transactional demand for currency owing
to slowdown in agriculture sector may have also contributed to this deceleration.
20

According to Overseas Investors Chambers of Commerce (OICCI) bi-annual survey of March 2014, business confidence
has gone down slightly due to rising cost of doing business, energy crises and deteriorating security environment. However,
recent announcement of decline in corporate tax rate from 35 percent to 33 percent for large tax payers in the budget for
FY15, may have slightly improved business sentiments.
State Bank of Pakistan

17

Monetary Policy Statement, July 2014

Despite this deceleration in CiC, the currency to deposit ratio has remained
unchanged at previous years level of 28, due to lower growth in deposits.
45.
Nevertheless, since most of the improvement in NFA and thereby lower
pressure of government borrowings from SBP is due to non-recurring external
inflows, sustainability of this trend could become challenging. For instance, despite
lower net government borrowings21 of Rs196.9 billion from SBP during FY14 as
compared to last year (Rs506.9 billion), the current years increase in SBPs holding of
MRTBs of Rs577.1 billion is higher than last year (Rs515.5 billion). The difference
between the two is mostly explained by an inflow of Rs157 billion in government
deposits received as grant under PDF. Thus, rather than relying on transitory inflows,
a meaningful increase in government resources such as tax revenues will be required
to consistently contain and reduce the stock of government borrowings from SBP as
stipulated in the SBP Act.

May-14

Feb-14

Nov-13

Aug-13

May-13

Feb-13

Nov-12

Aug-12

May-12

Feb-12

Nov-11

Aug-11

May-11

46.
Another challenge in the Figure 9: Real Deposit Growth and Real Returns
(in percent, year-on-year)
monetary sector is less than
WADR (outstanding)
Growth in total deposits (rhs)
desirable deposit mobilization by 3.0
12.0
10.0
banks to meet the total credit 1.5
8.0
demand of the economy. Thus, the 0.0
-1.5
6.0
growth in total private sector -3.0
4.0
deposits was of 12.6 percent -4.5
2.0
during FY14, could be due to (i) -6.0
0.0
continued negative real return on
deposits
which
may
be
Source: SBP
encouraging households to save
outside the formal economy (Figure 9);22 (ii) governments decision to allow access to
FBR over information on depositors accounts with banks; (iii) tax on cash
withdrawals; and (iv) lower government borrowings.
47.
With moderate growth in deposits, it became difficult to simultaneously meet
the end March 2014 IMF targets for government borrowings from SBP and SBPs
NDA. For instance, towards the end of March 2014 strong participation of scheduled
banks in the PIB auction necessitated liquidity injections by SBP. As a result, though
government borrowings from SBP remained lower than IMF target for end March
21

Net government borrowings equal total liabilities of the government (including MRTBS - the instruments through which
government borrows from SBP) minus their total deposits.
22
Real weighted average rates on outstanding deposits have been on average negative 1.54 percent during the period JulMay FY14 compared to on average positive 0.05 percent in the corresponding period of last year.
18

State Bank of Pakistan

Monetary Policy Statement, July 2014

2014, these liquidity injections led to a breach of SBPs NDA target by a small
margin23.
48.
Going forward, given SBPs policy of linking minimum saving deposit rate with
the repo rate, an improvement in real return on deposits can be expected. The
inflation is also expected to remain stable in FY15. These factors may help in
attracting higher volume of deposits in the banking system. Moreover, the exclusion
of time deposits under the revised regulation will have limited impact on growth in
deposits because it will be difficult for banks to reduce return on term deposits
below the savings category.24
C.

Fiscal Deficit: Curtailed and Supported by Increased External Finance

49.
Ministry of Finances provisional estimates for FY14 show the fiscal deficit at
5.8 percent of GDP (Table 5). This is considerably lower than 8.2 percent recorded in
FY13 and 6.3 percent target for the year. A combination of tax measures, non-tax
revenues and restraint over expenditures, particularly development spending, has
contributed in reducing the fiscal deficit for FY14.
50.
Total revenues have been estimated to grow by 28.8 percent in FY14; the
highest growth recorded in the last decade and higher than the budget estimates.
This acceleration in revenue growth is primarily due to substantial increase in nontax revenues, which exceeded the budget estimates and compensated for the lower
tax collection by the FBR. Specifically, the non-tax revenues grew by 45.9 percent,
bolstered by one-off revenue receipts of Rs157 billion under Pakistan Development
Fund (PDF), CSF of Rs105 billion, proceeds of Rs89 billion from the auction of 3G/4G
spectrum, and Rs67 billion from Universal Service Fund. Moreover, the transfer of
SBP profits has been considerably higher than the budget estimates.
51.
Reflecting the impact of increase in GST and removal of some tax exemptions
and concessions, the tax revenues have been estimated to grow by 22.5 percent in
FY14 against 7.1 percent increase in last year. Similarly, the FBR tax collection has
been estimated to grow by 17.5 percent compared to a meager 2.9 percent growth
witnessed last year. Despite this relative improvement, the growth is below the 27.8
percent increase envisaged in budget estimates, resulting in breach of the target.

23

As per end June 2014 provisional estimates, SBP NDA target may have also been missed by a negligible margin.

24

BPRD Circular No. 2 dated May 27, 2014, Minimum Rate of Return on Saving Deposits and SBP Repo Rate.

State Bank of Pakistan

19

Monetary Policy Statement, July 2014

52.
Deceleration
in
growth
of
development expenditures (including net
lending) to 5.3 percent in FY14 (or 4.7
percent of GDP) from 53.2 percent in FY13
(or 5.1 percent of GDP) is the other main
factor that has helped in reducing the
fiscal deficit in FY14. The current
expenditures, on the other hand, are still
higher than the budget estimates and
recorded a growth of 11.9 percent
compared to 2.6 percent a year earlier25.
As highlighted in previous monetary policy
statements, reduction in the fiscal deficit
was always going to be difficult with the
budgeted amount of development
expenditures. Moreover, the development
spending was linked to additional revenue
generation through Gas Infrastructure
Development Cess (GIDC) and other
administrative measures, which could not
generate the desired amount of
revenues.26

Table 5: Summary of Consolidated Fiscal Operations


billion rupees, unless stated otherwise
FY13P

FY14BE

FY14RE

FY15BE

2982

3640

3843

4216

FBR tax revenue

1936

2475

2275

2810

SBP profit

220

200

260

270

CSF money

172

105

3G license fee

120

89

56

Total expenditures

4816

5291

5314

5638

Current: of which

Total revenue: of which

3676

3964

4114

4421

Subsidies1

367

240

323

203

Interest

991

1154

1187

1325

1140

1327

1200

1217

Development; of which

363

86

120

Budget balance

Net lending

-1834

-1651

-1471

-1422

Financing

1834

1651

1471

1422

External

-2

169

714

508

Domestic

1835

1482

757

914

Non- Bank

378

507

382

686

Bank

1457

975

375

228

Memorandum items (as percent of GDP)


Overall budget balance

-8.2

-6.3

-5.8

-4.9

Primary balance

-3.7

-1.9

-1.1

-0.3

Revenue balance3

-3.1

-1.2

-1.1

-0.7

P: Provisional; BE: Budget Estimates; RE: Revised Estimates


1

shows subsidies by federal government only

total revenues minus total expenditures (excluding interest


payments)

53.
Along with more than budgeted
total revenues minus current expenditures
subsidies, interest payments continue to Source: Ministry of Finance
remain the major contributor to higher current expenditures. Interest payments are
estimated at Rs1187 billion about 30 percent of the current expenditures and 40
percent of the tax revenues. Though the upward adjustment in electricity tariffs has
resulted in marginal reduction in subsidies, the issues related to governance and
distribution losses of power companies remain a major risk to fiscal accounts (Figure
10). While substantial reduction in subsidies seems difficult going forward, interest
payments are likely to fall in FY15 with slowdown in domestic debt accumulation and
relative increase in low cost external funding.
3

25

Current expenditures include unidentified or statistical discrepency.


The GIDC was expected to generate revenues around 0.4 percent of GDP. However, this could only yield revenues
equivalent to 0.15 percent of GDP.
26

20

State Bank of Pakistan

Monetary Policy Statement, July 2014

billion rupees

54.
Lower fiscal deficit in FY14,
Figure 10: Trend in Energy Subsidies
Tariff differential subsidy
Other subsidy
especially the primary deficit
600
declining to 1.1 percent from 3.7
500
percent of GDP in FY13, and
400
increase in external borrowings,
300
have
resulted
in
slower
200
accumulation of domestic debt.
100
The growth in domestic debt
0
during FY14 has decelerated to
FY10
FY11
FY12
FY13
FY14
FY15BE
14.5 percent, which is significantly
Source: MoF Budget Documents
lower than the average growth of
27 percent during the last three years. This bodes well from the point of view of
countrys risk perception and could help in attracting investment in the economy.
55.
The growth in total interest payments are also expected to slowdown in FY15
as the share of relatively low cost external debt has increased. For instance, the
interest cost on recently issued Eurobonds for 5 and 10 year tenors is 7.25 and 8.25
percent compared to an interest cost of 12.66 and 13.08 percent for PIBs of similar
tenor27. However, the cost attached with external debt is susceptible to exchange
rate risk among other factors.
56.
The target for consolidated fiscal deficit in FY15 is set at 4.9 percent of GDP,
about 0.9 percent below the revised FY14 estimate of 5.8 percent of GDP. Underlying
this fiscal deficit target is the provincial surplus of Rs289 billion, FBR tax revenue of
Rs2810 billion, cut in current expenditure by 1 percent of GDP with a substantial
decrease in subsidies to Rs203 billion, and reduction in development expenditures by
0.5 percent of GDP.
57.
Though cutting development spending has proved to be the easiest option,
reducing subsidies as envisaged in the budget does not seem plausible under the
current circumstances. Given that increase in electricity tariffs last year 16 percent
for household and 24 percent for commercial and industrial use helped to reduce
subsidies by only Rs50 billion, reducing subsidies by more than Rs100 billion would
require a substantial increase in the tariffs. It indicates that there is a risk that
circular debt could reemerge unless substantial reforms are undertaken.

27

The total interest cost of Eurobonds comes to around $1.2 billion (or Rs 117 billion at the prevailing exchange rate). In
comparison the interest cost on raising equivalent amount of local currency bonds (PIBs) is about Rs 191 billion.
State Bank of Pakistan

21

Monetary Policy Statement, July 2014

58.
Nevertheless, major risk to the fiscal deficit target of 4.9 percent in FY15 is
from the revenue side. In particular, the FBR revenue target of Rs2810 billions looks
challenging given that no major tax reform has been introduced in the FY15 budget.
Moreover, growth in total revenues was due to a significant increase in non-tax
receipts, which may not be the case in FY15. This underscores the need for reforms
to broaden the tax base and improve the tax collection system. Without enhancing
tax revenues, it seems difficult to keep the fiscal deficit low while maintaining a
minimum level of development spending, which is critical for infrastructure needs of
the economy.
D.

External Sector: Increasing Financial Inflows and Rising Reserves

59.
Notwithstanding higher current account deficit in comparison to FY13, the
overall external sector position improved considerably during H2-FY14. This has been
mainly due to a substantial increase in the capital and financial account, which
witnessed a surplus of $6.1 billion during Jul-May FY14 against $465 million in the
corresponding period of last year (Table 6). Besides the advantage of an IMF
program, the receipt of $1.5 billion under Pakistan Development Fund (PDF) and
more than estimated issuance of Eurobonds28, on account of investors
overwhelming response, considerably reduced external sector concerns.
60.
Further, loans from multilateral donors under the IMF program 29 ($1.8
billion), auction of 3G/4G spectrum (foreign exchange component of $547 million),
UBL privatization proceeds ($311 million), continued CSF inflows ($1.0 billion), and
government loans from commercial banks ($348 million) supported an upward
trajectory of foreign exchange reserves. These developments in external sector
brought about a fundamental shift in sentiments in foreign exchange market.
61.
Fresh disbursements ($1.7 billion) under the new IMF program also helped
offset some of the impact of substantial repayments related to the previous IMF
program ($3.1 billion) during the year and averted drawdown of SBP reserves. The
net SBP reserves have increased to $9.6 billion as of 4th July 2014, equivalent to 2.8
months of imports, from the lowest level of $2.8 billion on 7th February, 2014 that
was less than a month of import cover.

28

The realisation was four times the budgeted amount of $500 million. Out of this $1 billion is raised for 5-years at a fixed
rate of 7.25 percent and $1 billion for 10-years at a fixed rate of 8.25 percent. These rates were 5.58 percent and 5.56
percent higher than the benchmark US treasury rates for bonds of corresponsing tenor.
29
These include WorldBank ($1 billion), ADB ($400 million) and IDB ($400 million).
22

State Bank of Pakistan

Monetary Policy Statement, July 2014


Table 6: Balance of Payments Summary
billion $, unless stated otherwise
FY13
I. Current account balance
Trade balance
Services balance

FY14

FY151

Jul-May

-2.5

-2.2

-2.6

-15.4

-14.1

-15.0

-1.5

-1.3

-2.1

of which :CSF

1.8

1.8

1.1

Income balance

-3.7

-3.4

-3.6

Current transfers balance

18.1

16.7

18.2

of which : Remittances

13.9

12.8

14.3

II. Capital account: of which

0.26

0.25

1.8

0.0

0.0

1.5

0.55

0.21

4.36

Pakistan Development Fund


III. Financial account : of which
Direct investment (net)

1.3

1.1

1.3

0.03

-0.02

2.4

0.0

0.0

2.0

0.25

0.11

0.98

IV. Errors and omissions

-0.3

-0.2

-0.2

Overall balance (I + II + III +IV)

-2.0

-1.9

3.3

-1.1

-1.0

-1.1

Portfolio investment (net)


of which :Eurobond
General government (net)

-2.5

Memorandum items:
Current account as % of GDP
Capital and financial a/c as % of GDP

-0.9

0.3

0.2

2.7

-2.5

-2.3

-0.47

End period net SBP forex reserves2

6.0

6.4

8.7

Exports growth (%)

0.4

0.7

1.3

5.0

Imports growth (%)

-0.6

0.3

3.3

7.0

5.6

5.7

12.4

Change in IMF credit and loans

Remittances growth (%)


1

SBP projections

Excluding CRR and foreign currency cash holdings

Source: SBP

Figure 11: SBP Reserves and Exchange Rate

SBP net liquid reserves

End-period interbank rate (rhs)

12

110.0

10

106.0

8
billion $

63.
These
developments
resulted in a complete reversal of
exchange
rate
depreciation
31
witnessed in H1-FY14. In fact the
sentiments in the foreign exchange
market started improving well
before the pickup in foreign
exchange reserves in March 2014
(Figure 11). SBP actions in the form
of increase in the policy rate in H1FY14 followed by tight rupee
liquidity conditions in the interbank
market resulted in curbing the
speculative demand for foreign
exchange. On the back of continued

FY13

102.0

98.0

4
2

94.0

90.0
Jun-12

Dec-12

Jun-13

Dec-13

PKR/US$

62.
Better inflows and build-up
of foreign exchange reserves
position also helped in comfortably
meeting the IMFs end March FY14
target of Net International Reserves
(NIR) without putting pressure in
the foreign exchange market.30 As
per provisional estimates, the end
June 2014 NIR target has also been
met. Importantly, the NIR by endJune 2014 is positive 2.7 billion
compared to negative 2.4 billion a
year earlier a net increase of $5.1
billion.
Based
on
these
developments, Moody's Investors
Service has revised the outlook on
Pakistan's
foreign
currency
government bond rating to stable
from negative on 14th July 2014.

Jun-14
Source: SBP

30

The target for end March FY14 was exceeded by a considerable margin of $732 million.
Although depreciation in exchange rate was arrested following SBP and government efforts in early December 2013,
pressure in the market continued and exchange rate hovered around Rs105-106 per USD in Jan-Feb FY14.
31

State Bank of Pakistan

23

Monetary Policy Statement, July 2014

improvement in market sentiments and supplemented by larger foreign exchange


inflows exchange rate has appreciated by 10.0 percent to Rs98.8 per USD on 4th July
2014 after reaching a high of Rs108.6 per USD on 3rd December 2013.32

May-14

Apr-14

Mar-14

Feb-14

Jan-14

Dec-13

Nov-13

Oct-13

Sep-13

Aug-13

Jul-13

64.
PKR has also strengthened Figure 12: Growth in Effective Exchange Rate
against other trading partners (in percent, cumulative since end June 2013)
NEER
RPI
REER
currencies.33 The nominal effective 9.0
exchange
rate
(NEER)
has 6.0
appreciated by 8.5 percent during 3.0
0.0
December 2013 to May 2014.
-3.0
Despite relative price index (RPI) -6.0
decreasing by 0.07 percent, real -9.0
effective exchange rate (REER) has
appreciated by 8.4 percent during
Source: SBP
this period (Figure 12). This
appreciation in real exchange rate suggests deterioration in export competitiveness
of the country. This could further add to trade deficit, which continues to remain
high and is the major contributor to the current account deficit.
65.
Despite continually rising workers remittances, the external current account
witnessed a higher deficit of $2.6 billion during Jul-May FY14 as compared to $2.2
billion in the corresponding period of last year. This was mainly contributed by a
higher trade deficit as growth in imports (3.3 percent) outpaced growth in exports
(1.3 percent).

32

Figure 13: Oil Imports

Oil payments

billion $

66.
Trade deficit has remained
around 6.5 percent of GDP during
the past five years largely due to
higher oil imports and stagnant
exports. The oil imports have
remained the major contributor to
rising import bill with its share in
imports doubling since FY04. This
suggests that reducing oil imports
could go a long way in keeping

As percent of total imports (rhs)

17.5

42.0

15.0

36.0

12.5

30.0

10.0

24.0

7.5

18.0

5.0

12.0

2.5

6.0

0.0

0.0

FY04
* Jul-May

FY06

FY08

FY10

FY12

FY14*
Source: SBP

In FY14 PKR has appreciated by 0.9 percent.


Although PKR has appreciated againt other currencies, appreciation against USD contributed mostly to the appreciation
in NEER.
33

24

State Bank of Pakistan

Monetary Policy Statement, July 2014

trade deficit at a manageable level,34 which could be achieved by shifting electricity


generation to low cost alternatives such as coal, hydel, etc (Figure 13).35
67.
Similarly, expansion in exports could be achieved through diversification, both
across products and markets. Growth in exports during Jul-May FY14 was largely due
to textiles as non-textile exports witnessed a decline. Given the high concentration of
textiles in Pakistans exports to European region (75 percent of total exports to EU),
Pakistan is likely to partially benefit from GSP plus status because textiles have the
least tariff relief under this scheme.36 In this context, new product lines need to be
developed within the textile sector in addition to focusing on new areas to increase
their share in overall exports.37 Also, new export destinations should be explored.
68.
Incorporating the latest developments and accounting for expected increase
in energy supply, SBP projects exports to grow in the range of 4.0 to 6.0 percent in
FY15. Similarly, given the stable outlook of international commodity prices and
expected better economic activity, imports are expected to witness a higher growth
in the range of 6.0 to 8.0 percent in FY15. These projections of exports and imports
growth translate into a trade deficit of $17.1 to $18.4 billion (or 5.5 to 7.0 percent of
GDP) for FY15. Assuming $1.2 billion CSF, proceeds of $300 million from auction of
remaining 4G license and workers remittances at $16.5 billion, the external current
account deficit is projected to remain in the vicinity of 1.0 percent of GDP.
69.
In addition to a benign external current account outlook, realization of inflows
on account of planned privatization of OGDCL and other public sector entities,
planned issuance of Eurobond ($500 million) and Sukuk ($500 million) in
international markets and program financing from multilateral donors under the IMF
program would also help in maintaining the upward trajectory in foreign exchange
reserves in FY15. The consistent foreign exchange reserve build-up together with a
prudent monetary policy stance would facilitate in keeping the foreign exchange
market stable.
70.
Nonetheless, sustainability of external sector over the medium term could
become challenging, specifically in the post IMF program years. Sustaining the recent
34

Level of trade deficit that could be financed through private inflows, and hence does not translate into stress in the
foreign exchange market.
35
Economic Survey 2013-14 outlines road map of increasing the power generation capacity as well as improving the energy
mix in the medium trem.
36
Scheik, Zeevar(2013), "Enhancing Pakistan's Trading Benefits from the proposed EU GSP plus Scheme", Trade Related
Technical Assistance Program funded by European Commission.
37
Leather, sports and footwear etc.
State Bank of Pakistan

25

Monetary Policy Statement, July 2014

improving trends over medium term needs additional efforts to ensure better law
and order, address energy sector issues, carry out fiscal reforms, and improve
economic governance. The improved domestic outlook on account of these
measures would result in restoring investors confidence and thus revival of non-debt
creating private inflows which remains at the heart of external sector sustainability.
E.

Economic Growth: Sustainability of Recovery Requires Additional Reforms

FY14

FY13

FY12

FY11

FY10

FY09

FY08

FY07

FY06

FY05

FY04

FY03

FY02

FY01

FY00

71.
The
National
Income Figure 14: Real GDP Growth
Accounts estimates show that real (in percent)
Growth (basic price)
Average
GDP grew by 4.1 percent in FY14 9.0
compared to 3.7 percent last year. 7.5
Though real GDP growth target of 6.0
4.4 percent for FY14 was missed, it 4.5
is first time in 6 years that growth 3.0
has surpassed the 4 percent mark 1.5
0.0
(Figure 14). Encouragingly, this
higher growth in FY14 was led by
Source: PBS
recovery in the industrial sector,
thanks to better performance of LSM and a turnaround in construction activity
besides improvement in electricity generation. This improvement lends some
credence to SBPs consistent stance that the major constraint to growth is not high
nominal interest rates set by SBPs monetary policy; rather it is issues like energy
shortages and law and order conditions.
72.
As anticipated at the Figure 15: Average Electricity Load Management
beginning of FY14, electricity (in Mega Watts)
4500
generation did improve during the
4000
year. Following the resolution of
3500
circular debt in June 2013 capacity
3000
utilization by power companies
2500
has somewhat increased (Figure
2000
15). Not only did it increase value
FY10
FY11
FY12
FY13
Jul-Apr Jul-Apr
FY13
FY14
addition by electricity and gas Note: It is the period average of difference in total electricity generation
peak hour demand of each day; a lower number indicates less
distribution, but also helped the and
loadshedding.
Source: NTDC
manufacturing
sector.
The
manufacturing sector also benefitted from some recovery in exports, especially of
textiles.
26

State Bank of Pakistan

Monetary Policy Statement, July 2014

73.
On the other hand, agriculture sector growth decelerated mainly due to
decline in the production of cotton and other minor crops. Though growth in services
sector was also lower than last year, its contribution to growth remains significant
given its high share in GDP. A sustainable increase in GDP growth, nonetheless,
would require consistent improvement in productivity across sectors, which is not
directly related to SBPs monetary policy stance. The role of monetary policy is
limited in increasing the economys growth potential. Its fundamental role in
economic growth is to ensure monetary and financial stability on consistent basis.
74.
On the demand side, the real GDP growth continued to be driven by higher
consumption. Both the private and public sectors contributed to 6.9 percent increase
in total consumption compared to 3.4 percent growth last year. As a result, the share
of consumption in domestic demand has slowly and steadily risen from 82 percent in
FY08 to 87 percent in FY14.38 Although aggregate demand is still moderate in SBPs
assessment a falling share of investment in GDP is worrisome as it indicates erosion
in the economys future productive capacity.
75.
Decline in growth in Figure 16: Investment Expenditure
investment expenditures in FY14
As percent of GDP (market price)
Growth rate (rhs)
4.0
validates this concern. The total 17.0
2.0
investment grew by only 1 percent 16.0
0.0
in FY14, down from 2.5 percent 15.0
-2.0
growth last year, largely due to 14.0
-4.0
decline
in
private
sector 13.0
-6.0
investment by 1.6 percent. It also 12.0
-8.0
maintained its declining trend in 11.0
FY10
FY11
FY12
FY13
FY14
terms of percent of GDP, falling to
Source: MoF; Economic Survey 2013-14
14.0 percent in FY14 from 14.6
percent last year (Figure 16). It seems that the increase in credit for fixed investment
in FY14 is meant for replacement of depreciating capital assets and investment.
Moreover, growth in private sector credit usually affect investment with a lag of one
year. Increase in investment as a share of GDP is critical for a sustainable path to
economic recovery in the medium term.
76.
While the importance of political stability, better law and order conditions and
a conducive business environment can hardly be overemphasized in promoting
investment, addressing energy shortages can go a long way in reviving investment
38

Domestic demand is the sum of total consumption and investment expenditures of both private and public sectors.
State Bank of Pakistan

27

Monetary Policy Statement, July 2014

and sustaining higher growth. These constraints have been affecting productivity,
thereby constraining economys ability to produce at its potential, which itself has
declined over the past few years due to falling investment and other constraints.
77.
Although the resolution of circular debt and consequent increase in utilization
of existing generation capacity has provided temporary relief, there is a need to
expand the existing capacity through low cost alternatives, stem line losses and
improve recoveries to permanently contain the reemergence of circular debt. A
combination of increased utilization of existing power generation capacity and
addition of new capacity is necessary to further narrow the supply-demand energy
gap going forward.
78.
Further increase in electricity supply, combined with expected higher growth
in exports, could help the manufacturing sector maintain the current momentum. In
addition, completion of governments planned infrastructure projects is likely to
provide boost to construction activity and related industries. The current trends in
private sector credit also point to better real economic activity in FY15. These
developments in industrial sector are also likely to positively impact the performance
of services sector, which could also marginally benefit from improved
telecommunication services with the start of 3G/4G mobile technology.
Incorporating these improvements, the real GDP growth is projected to be between
4 to 5 percent in FY15.39
79.
To achieve and sustain higher growth rate in excess of 6 percentwhich is the
minimum level required to absorb the expected new entrants in the labor marketit
is imperative for the government to complete the planned addition to power
generation over the coming years. At the same time, there is also need to gradually
shift oil-based power generation to low-cost alternatives. Similarly, improving law
and order conditions has become vital to arrest the declining trend in investment.
Fiscal reforms that could provide room for banks to lend to the private sector and for
government to spend more on infrastructure can also revive private investment and
growth.

39

This growth outlook assumes about 3 percent growth in agriculture, which is dependent on weather conditions and is
highly uncertain.
28

State Bank of Pakistan

Monetary Policy Statement, July 2014

F. Inflation: Moderate at a Single Digit Level


80.
The year-on-year inflation witnessed high volatility during FY14. It rose from
5.9 percent in June 2013 to 10.9 percent in November 2013, declined in subsequent
months before rising again to 9.2 percent in April 2014. Thereafter, it has again
receded to 8.2 percent in June 2014. Though the upward adjustment in administered
prices in the first few months of FY14 caused higher inflation initially, volatility in the
prices of perishable food items owing to supply chain disruptions resulted in higher
than usual variation in year-on-year inflation.40
81.
Nevertheless,
for
the Figure 17: Target vs. Actual CPI Inflation
(in percent)
second consecutive year, the
Actual
Target
average CPI inflation in FY14 has 15.0
remained within the single digit 12.0
level of 8.6 percent though it is still
9.0
higher than the years inflation
6.0
target of 8.0 percent set by the
3.0
government
(Figure
17).
0.0
Anticipating this outcome, the
FY10
FY11
FY12
FY13
FY14
policy rate has been maintained at
Source: PBS and SBP
10 percent since November 2013
to further anchor inflation expectations by keeping the real interest rate in the
positive territory.
82.
Despite relatively high average Table 7: Average Inflation
CPI inflation than FY13, both measures in percent
FY13
of core inflation, i.e. non-food non7.4
energy (NFNE) and 20% trimmed, CPI headline
Food group
7.1
exhibited gradual softening during
Non-food group
7.5
FY14 (Table 7). This indicates moderate Core measures
aggregate demand in the economy
NFNE*
9.6
20%
trimmed
9.0
relative to the available productive
capacity. The marginal increase in GDP * non-food non-energy; Projections
Source: PBS and SBP
growth to 4.1 percent in FY14 is mostly
a reflection of better utilization of spare capacity.

FY14

FY151

8.6

7.5 - 8.5

9.0
8.3

8.3
8.5

40

Perishable food items exhibited inflation of 15.4 percent during FY14 as compared to 1.5 percent inflation in FY13.
State Bank of Pakistan

29

Monetary Policy Statement, July 2014

83.
In general, the supply conditions have improved in FY14. This is reflected in
better growth of large scale manufacturing (LSM) supported by a gradual
enhancement in power generation. Also, better production of non-perishable food
items, such as sugar and rice during H1-FY14 and wheat by the end of FY14
contributed to this trend.41 This improvement in supply conditions along with
moderate aggregate demand helped in containing inflationary pressure buildup in
FY14. In addition, general deceleration in international commodity prices along with
stability in international oil price has also favorably affected domestic inflation in
FY14.
84.
Moreover, to reduce the budget deficit, the government undertook some
fiscal consolidation measures in line with the requirements of the ongoing IMF
program. For instance, to reduce subsidies, the government introduced upward
adjustment in power tariffs earlier in the year and also enhanced GST rate while
withdrawing certain tax related exemptions. This kept CPI inflation elevated in H1FY14. On the other hand, improvements in external financing in H2-FY14 not only
contained the inflationary impact of government budgetary borrowing from the
banking system but also resulted in appreciation of PKR in March 2014. Thereafter,
exchange rate has remained stable, thereby easing pressure on domestic prices of
imported goods.
85.
The containment of government budgetary borrowings and exchange rate
stability amid improved foreign inflows have helped in anchoring inflation
expectations. This is also evident from the SBP-IBA Consumer Confidence Survey
(CCI) of July 2014 that predicts more or less stable inflation expectations till H1-FY15.
As sentiments in the economy have improved, there is uptake in private sector credit
and banks have started investing in long term government securities (PIBs). This
trend is expected to continue in FY15 as well.
86.
The SBP expects average CPI inflation to remain in the range of 7.5 percent to
8.5 percent in FY15. Other than assuming continuation of current monetary policy
stance, this outlook is supported by (i) continuation of moderate aggregate demand
along with ongoing improvement in capacity utilization; (ii) further containment in
government budgetary borrowing from the banking system; (iii) overall stable
outlook of international commodity prices; and (iv) marginal impact of new tax
measures for FY15. However, international oil price uncertainty and unanticipated
price shocks pose risks to the inflation outlook.
41

Non-perishable food group witnessed inflation of 7.6 percent both during FY14 and FY13.

30

State Bank of Pakistan

Monetary Policy Statement, July 2014

III.

Concluding Remarks

87.
There has been noticeable improvement in most macroeconomic indicators of
the economy in FY14. Led by external sector, both monetary and fiscal sectors
showed visible progress. Economic activity continued an upward trajectory as
indicated by increase in production (GDP), growth in LSM and rise in private sector
credit. Inflation, despite some volatility, remained in single digit. These are all
welcome signs requiring continuity in policy stance and vigilance regarding potential
risks.
88.
Notwithstanding higher current account deficit in comparison to FY13, the
overall external sector position has improved due to considerable increase in net
flows in financial accounts and robust growth in remittances. Most of these inflows
are, however, non-recurring in nature and debt creating. Private inflows in FDI and
FPI have improved but not to the extent that they could support current account
deficit. Unless the fundamental weakness in the balance of payments i.e. the trade
deficit is addressed, external account would remain vulnerable in the absence of
matching private inflows.
89.
The outlook for external account in FY15, however, is stable. Barring any
exogenous shock, the current account deficit is expected to remain in a manageable
range. Official inflows are again expected to lead financial and capital account
surplus which would add to the foreign exchange reserves. Sustainability of these
trends in the medium term, specifically in the post IMF program years, requires
additional efforts to ensure better law and order, address energy sector issues, carry
out fiscal reforms, and improve economic governance.
90.
Improvement in the external sector is also visible in the foreign exchange
market as PKR appreciated considerably against USD in H2-FY14. A combination of
positive sentiments, private inflows (from exporters) and reduction in SBP
outstanding forward position led to the recent rally in the value of rupee. As the
liquidity in the foreign exchange market improved, SBP calibrated its interventions to
anchor market sentiments, stabilize foreign exchange market and build up reserves.
This, in turn, helped achieve the NIR targets of March and June 2014 set by the IMF.
91.
Despite significant injections in the market rupee liquidity remained tight,
which facilitated stability in the foreign exchange market. Nevertheless, the average
money market repo rate hovered slightly above the ceiling of SBP corridor that
State Bank of Pakistan

31

Monetary Policy Statement, July 2014

nudged other market interest rates towards the higher side. Continuation of this
trend may have negative implications for real interest rates and private investment
in the economy.
92.
The one-off external inflows enabled the government to borrow lower
amounts from the banking system for budgetary support. As governments demand
for credit eased, private sector borrowed substantial amount of credit for working
capital and fixed investments. Given the current momentum in credit uptake and
expected growth in LSM and GDP, we expect private sector credit to grow reasonably
well in FY15. This assessment also takes into account the satisfactory asset quality
and capital adequacy of the banking sector.
93.
The concern in this regard is the less than desirable growth in banking system
deposit. To provide incentive to savers through real returns and encourage them to
save inside the formal economy, SBP has already linked the minimum rate on savings
deposits to 50bps below the floor of the interest rate corridor. Government too
needs to reconsider measures, such as tax on cash withdrawals and access to FBR
over customer accounts, which deter depositors.
94.
On the fiscal front, government successfully brought down the fiscal deficit to
5.8 percent of GDP from the budgeted 6.3 percent, primarily through increase in
non-tax revenues and decrease in development outlay of federal and provincial
governments. However, running expenses of the government remained high and the
FBR tax collection target in FY14 is estimated to fall short of the target. This implies
that the improvements in the fundamental factors, on the fiscal front, are still
awaited.
95.
Another important highlight, in the fiscal sector, is the slower accumulation of
domestic debt. Lower fiscal deficit and increase in external borrowings resulted in
slower growth in domestic debt during FY14. This bodes well from the point of view
of countrys risk perception and could help in attracting investment in the economy.
Moreover, the recent shift in borrowing pattern of government from short term to
long term is also expected to lower the rollover risk and lengthen average term to
maturity of public debt going forward.
96.
The growth in investments has once again declined despite real GDP growing
at 4.1 percent in FY14. The continuous decline in the investment to GDP ratio has
increased the likelihood of a decline in the productive capacity in the economy as
32

State Bank of Pakistan

Monetary Policy Statement, July 2014

well. In this backdrop, the decline in both measures of core inflation, non-food nonenergy (NFNE) and 20% trimmed, indicate moderate aggregate demand in the
economy, at the moment. However, as demand picks up, the production constraints
existing in the economy might become binding which could lead to inflationary
pressures in the medium term.
97.
However, currently due to the containment of government budgetary
borrowings and exchange rate stability amid improved foreign inflows, inflation
expectations are benign. This is evident from the SBP-IBA Consumer Confidence
Survey (CCI) of July 2014 that predicts more or less stable inflation expectations till
H1-FY15. SBP also expects inflation to remain in single digit in FY15. However,
international oil price uncertainty and unanticipated price shocks pose risks to the
inflation outlook.
98.
While the importance of bringing political stability, improving law and order
conditions and creating conducive business environment can hardly be
overemphasized, addressing energy shortages can go a long way in reviving
investment and sustaining higher growth. It is these constraints which have been
affecting productivity and constraining economys ability to produce at its potential.
Interest rate, at the moment, do not appear to be the prime factor affecting
investment in the economy.
99.
In conclusion, the Board of Directors of SBP has decided to keep the policy
rate unchanged at 10.0 percent. Henceforth, the Board has also decided to publish
the summary of minutes of monetary policy proceedings of the Board meeting in
four weeks.

State Bank of Pakistan

33

Monetary Policy Statement, July 2014

List of Acronyms
ADB
BE
BPRD
bps
BSD
CAR
CCI
CiC
CPI
CRR
CSF
ECB
EFF
EU
FBR
FDI
Forex
FPI
FY
GDP
GIDC
GSP
GST
H1
H2
IBA
IDB
IDR
IMF
KIBOR
LIBOR
LSM
M2
MoF
MRTBs
MTB
NBFCs
NDA
NEER
NFA
NFNE
34

Asian Development Bank


Budget Estimates
Banking Policy & Regulation Department
Basis Points
Banking Surveillance Department
Capital Adequacy Ratio
Consumer Confidence Survey
Currency in Circulation
Consumer Price Index
Cash Reserves Requirement
Coalition Support Fund
European Central Bank
Extended Fund Facility
European Union
Federal Board of Revenue
Foreign Direct Investment
Foreign Exchange
Foreign Portfolio Investment
Fiscal Year
Gross Domestic Product
Gas Infrastructure Development Cess
Generalized System of Preferences
General Sales Tax
First half
Second Half
Institute of Business Administration
Islamic Development Bank
Investments to Deposit Ratio
International Monetary Fund
Karachi Interbank Offer Rate
London Interbank Offer Rate
Large-scale Manufacturing
Broad Money
Ministry of Finance
Market Related Treasury Bills
Market Treasury Bills
Non Bank Finance Companies
Net Domestic Assets
Nominal Effective Exchange Rate
Net Foreign Assets
Non-Food Non-Energy

State Bank of Pakistan

Monetary Policy Statement, July 2014

NIM
NIR
NPLs
NTDC
OGDCL
OICCI
OMO
OPEC
PBS
PDF
PIBs
PKR
PPL
PSC
PSEs
PTCL
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
RE
REER
RHS
ROA
ROE
RPI
Rs
SA light
SBA
SBP
T-Bills
TDS
TLTRO
UBL
US
USD
WADR
WALR
YoY
$
3G
4G

Net Interest Margin


Net International Reserves
Non-Performing Loans
National Transmission and Dispatch Company
Oil and Gas Development Company Limited
Overseas Investors Chambers of Commerce and Industry
Open Market Operations
Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries
Pakistan Bureau of Statistics
Pakistan Development Fund
Pakistan Investment Bonds
Pakistan Rupee
Pakistan Petroleum Limited
Private Sector Credit
Public Sector Enterprises
Pakistan Telecommunication Limited
First Quarter
Second Quarter
Third Quarter
Fourth Quarter
Revised Estimates
Real Effective Exchange Rate
Right Hand Side
Return on Assets
Return on Equity
Relative Price Index
Pakistani Rupees
Saudi Arabian Light
Standby Agreement
State Bank of Pakistan
Treasury Bills
Tariff Difference Subsidy
Targeted Long-term Refinancing Operation
United Bank Limited
United States
United States Dollar
Weighted Average Deposit Rate
Weighted Average Lending Rate
Year on year
United States Dollar
3rd Generation
4th Generation

State Bank of Pakistan

35

You might also like