Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

C M Charles Synergetic Classroom

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 5

C. M.

Charles: The Synergetic


Classroom
By
Sydney Yee and

Ashly Emerson

C. M. Charles has a Ph.D in Curriculum & Educational Psychology from


University of New Mexico Charles has held faculty positions at Columbia
University and Pepperdine University, as well as currently at San Diego State
University. Charles has advised the governments of Peru and Brazil in
concerning education and curriculum and is most known for his writings
which include Educational Psychology (1976), Individualizing Instructions
(1976) and most notably The Synergetic Classroom (2000).
C. M. Charles defines synergy as a state characterized by high energy,
creativity and production. The people and other entities involved in synergy
feed psychic energy to each other [giving teachers and students] peak
educational experiences that leave themexhilarated (9).
A Synergetic Classroom is composed of 9 essential elements:
ethics
trust
charisma
communication
interest
class agreements
coopetition
human relations

problem resolution

Ethics
The foundation for
this model
Let students have
their dignity
Respect
Be fair

Communication
7 Gears of
Communication
Listening
Understanding
Reacting Helpfully
Encouraging
Persuading
Disagreeing
Productively
Resolving
Problems Amicably

Coopetition
"Cooperating to
Compete"
Advantages
and
Disadvantages
Compete as
groups
Motivation
Quality
Likelihood of
synergy

Trust
Ethics fosters trust
Trust is built and can
be lost easily
Keep promises
Honesty
Patience

Charisma
Gain interest with
charisma
Show your
personality
Show interest in
your student's lives
Then keep them
hooked with
meaningful and
interesting content
Energized Lessons Make learning fun

Interest
Know Students
Identify Needs
Make School
Interesting
Allow Choice
Try a Facilitative
Teaching Style

Class Agreements
Guidelines and
Rules
Find out what
students like and
dislike about school
How do students
prefer to learn
Send copy home to
parents
Periodical class
meetings

Human Relations
Student to
student
interaction
Teacher to
student
interaction
Greeting
Body language
Reactions

Problem
Resolution
Address
problem
immediately
Class Meeting
"I" statements
Focus on
problem
behavior, not
the person
Save Face
Remaining
calm

Advantages

Personal connection
Increased understanding and equality
Creates classroom community (not a dictatorship)
Teaches students to work together
Student share the burden of work
Makes learning more engaging
Prevents misbehavior before it happens

Disadvantages

Idealistic
A teacher may not be experienced enough to complete all aspects of
this model
Teacher needs to find perfect balance otherwise this technique may
not work
May allow for an unequal work burden
Students may develop a lack of initiative and a lack of personal
responsibility
Work Cited

DiPrima, M. B. (2007, April 7).


C.M. Charles. Retrieved February
9, 2015, from http://scilssynergetic.pbworks.com/w/page
/11077234/FrontPage
Deininger, K. (2010, September
26). C.M. Charles & "Synergetic
Discipline". Retrieved February
10, 2015, from
https://sites.google.com/site/mis
sdeiningersmanagement/
theorist-synergetic-discipline

You might also like