Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Thepaper 1 Bible

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 2

May 3, 2010

T H E PAPE R 1 B I B L E
H

w
w

o
i t

u c
a

c
p

e
a

s
p

s
e

f
r

Question 1A/1B

Question 2

Question 3

Question 4

Understand historical sources

Compare and contrast historical

Explain the importance and

Evaluate and synthesize evidence

sources as evidence

limitations of historical sources

from both historical sources and


background knowledge

5 Marks

6 Marks

6 Marks

8 Marks

10 Minutes

15 Minutes

15 Minutes

20 Minutes

The content of the Paper 1 will be focussed on one of the bullet points from the 2010 History Course Guide.
Therefore, it is important that you have sufficient knowledge about each bullet point in the syllabus.
Reading Time - 5 Minutes
How to approach:
Open the Question Booklet and read the questions. Keep the question booklet open and refer to it when you:
Read the Source Booklet. Consider the origin of each source before reading the content below.
Make sure you consider the sources in relation to the questions in the Question Booklet.
When you finish reading the sources, begin to formulate the answer to question 1a in your head.
Things to remember:
You cannot highlight the sources at this point, but you should be very familiar with them.
Reading time is exam time. Do not waste any time and start daydreaming.
Question 1A - 5 Minutes
Reading Comprehension (3 Marks)
How to approach:
You should have begun considering this question during the reading time.
The question is worth three marks, but try to write down four points just in case one of
your ideas is wrong.
You can either quote the source or paraphrase the source in your answer.
Things to remember:
Make sure your answer is focused and succinct.
Dont spend too much time on this question. It is common to get lost here.
Question 1B - 5 Minutes
Political Cartoon/Photograph Analysis (2 Marks)
How to approach:
Before you try to answer what the cartoon means, deconstruct the cartoon.
Identify the key figures, symbols and labeling
After youve got your clues, be a detective and try to figure out the message of the image.
Use the key figures, symbols, labeling and caption to justify what you think the message is.
Things to remember:
Again, dont spend too much time on this question. Response should be focused and
succinct.

% OF GRADE
HL

SL

20

30

Hey it could be worse,


at least its not a Paper 2....
Political Cartoon Analysis
1. Who are the key figures and what are
they doing? What, if any, is the significance
of the way the figures are dressed or what
they are doing?
2. Are there any symbols in the cartoon?
What are they? What do they represent?
Why were these symbols chosen?
3. Is there any labeling that is present?
What is the purpose of such labeling?
4. Is the issue treated satirically or seriously?
5. How does the picture relate to the issue/
event that the cartoonist is presenting?
6. What is the cartoonists point of view?
Where does he or she stand? What
message is being conveyed?

Pa u l H a r t UA S D u b a i P O B o x 7 9 1 3 3 D u b a i , UA E p h a r t @ u a s d u b a i . a e

May 3, 2010

T H E PAPE R 1 B I B L E
Question 2 - 15 Minutes
Comparison and Contrast (6 Marks)
How to approach:
Read both sources again and highlight (in a light colour) the key ideas in each source
You may choose to make a few notes on scrap paper that briefly identify the similarities
and differences in relation to the question or you may begin to:
Write the comparison of both sources in the first paragraph and then the differences of
the sources in the second paragraph.
Things to remember:
Make sure the C&C are separate.
C&C the content of the sources, not the origin or purpose of them.
Contrast can be the differences between the two sources or when one source mentions
something that the other ignores.
Question 3 - 15 Minutes
Evaluation of Sources (OPVL) (6 Marks)
How to approach:
Read both sources again, paying particular attention to the italicized origin of the source.
Highlight (in a light colour) any key information in the origin or content of the source.
Write Q3 by evaluating one source and then the other.
Write a structured response (e.g. Origin - The origin of Source C is...).
Things to remember:
Make sure to explicitly refer to origin, purpose, value, and limitation.
Origin - if a primary source has been reprinted in another source, look at the original
source, not where/when it was reprinted.
Purpose - give the purpose of the source, not the excerpt.
Value and limitations - use the information you have on the origin and purpose to
evaluate the value and limitation of the source. Write 2-3 points for the value and
limitation of each source.
Avoid using the word bias without stating what kind of bias it is and providing
justification from the source.
Question 4 - 20 Minutes
Mini-Essay (8 Marks)
How to approach:
Read/skim the sources and highlight (in a dark colour) key info related to the question
Sketchy a brief essay outline (2-3 minutes).
Brainstorm three arguments - try to make them balanced so you can use all the
sources in your essay.
imagine it was a P2: what information would you include (own knowledge).
Start your essay with a thesis that has your three arguments built into it.
Write your essay. Refer to your outline while you write.
Things to remember:
Make sure you use both the sources (try to use all) and your own knowledge
You dont need an intro or conclusion.
If you have left yourself short on time (gar!!!), abandon the essay and use a laundry list
approach. Connect each source to the question. Include your own knowledge where
appropriate.

Common Limitations of Sources


Subjective (Emotionally Laden)
Evidence: Language, Tone, Style
Public vs. Private
Proximity to Event
Selective use of information
Political Bias
Historian - National/Social Influence/Bias
General texts lack depth/detail
Language Issues (access to foreign
documents/translation)
Soviet Secrecy & Manipulation of Statistics
Lack of access to Communist Archives
(pre-1991 USSR)
Face Saving
Propaganda
Exaggeration (Motivation for?)

Some Final Tips...


1. Don't panic; read the documents. Don't
be surprised if the subject is
obscure.You'll learn as you read. You are
being assessed on you skill of document
analysis. So get in there and analyze.
2. Make sure you understand the
question.
3. Remember that there is no one right
answer on source analysis questions.
Explanation and support for your answer
is what makes it right. Make sure you
support your opinion by citing the
documents.
4. Note the point of view of the author or
speaker in each document. Pay attention
to the social status or profession of the
author/speaker.
5. Note the tone of the writer/speaker.
6. Note the date of the documents. Their
status as a primary or secondary source
will impact how you interpret and
evaluate them.
7. Remember that the documents are not
necessarily facts. The documents quite
likely express the opinion or perception of
the author/speaker.
9. Assume the reader of the exam knows the
documents inside and out but cite the
documents that you use (e.g. Source C
argues)Do not quote extensively from
the documents.
10. Concise and exact responses are
much better than long and general ones.

Pa u l H a r t UA S D u b a i P O B o x 7 9 1 3 3 D u b a i , UA E p h a r t @ u a s d u b a i . a e

You might also like