Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 50 views

    Reflection Rubric

    Uploaded by

    api-290583845
    This rubric evaluates student reflections on course materials based on four criteria: depth of reflection, required components, structure, and evidence and practice. For each criterion, students can receive scores of superior (4), sufficient (3), minimal (1-2), or unacceptable (0). The rubric provides descriptions of the level of reflection, organization, writing quality, and synthesis expected to receive each score on each criterion.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Reflection Rubric

    Uploaded by

    api-290583845
    50 views1 page
    This rubric evaluates student reflections on course materials based on four criteria: depth of reflection, required components, structure, and evidence and practice. For each criterion, students can receive scores of superior (4), sufficient (3), minimal (1-2), or unacceptable (0). The rubric provides descriptions of the level of reflection, organization, writing quality, and synthesis expected to receive each score on each criterion.

    Original Title

    reflection rubric

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This rubric evaluates student reflections on course materials based on four criteria: depth of reflection, required components, structure, and evidence and practice. For each criterion, students can receive scores of superior (4), sufficient (3), minimal (1-2), or unacceptable (0). The rubric provides descriptions of the level of reflection, organization, writing quality, and synthesis expected to receive each score on each criterion.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as doc, pdf, or txt
    50 views1 page

    Reflection Rubric

    Uploaded by

    api-290583845
    This rubric evaluates student reflections on course materials based on four criteria: depth of reflection, required components, structure, and evidence and practice. For each criterion, students can receive scores of superior (4), sufficient (3), minimal (1-2), or unacceptable (0). The rubric provides descriptions of the level of reflection, organization, writing quality, and synthesis expected to receive each score on each criterion.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as doc, pdf, or txt
    of 1

    Reflection Evaluation-Rubric

    Criteria
    Depth of
    Reflection

    Required
    Components

    Superior 4

    Sufficient 3
    Response demonstrates a general
    reflection on, and personalization of,
    the theories, concepts, and/or strategies
    presented in the course materials to
    date. Viewpoints and interpretations are
    supported. Appropriate examples are
    provided, as applicable.

    Minimal 1-2

    Unacceptable 0

    Response demonstrates a minimal


    reflection on, and personalization
    of, the theories, concepts, and/or
    strategies presented in the course
    materials to date. Viewpoints and
    interpretations are unsupported or
    supported with flawed arguments.
    Examples, when applicable, are not
    provided or are irrelevant to the
    assignment.

    Response demonstrates a lack of


    reflection on, or personalization of, the
    theories, concepts, and/or strategies
    presented in the course materials to
    date. Viewpoints and interpretations
    are missing, inappropriate, and/or
    unsupported. Examples, when
    applicable, are not provided.

    Response includes all components


    and meets or exceeds all
    requirements indicated in the
    instructions. Each question or part
    of the assignment is addressed
    thoroughly.

    Response includes all components and


    meets all requirements indicated in the
    instructions. Each question or part of
    the assignment is addressed. All
    attachments and/or additional
    documents are included, as required.

    Response excludes essential


    components and/or does not address
    the requirements indicated in the
    instructions. Many parts of the
    assignment are addressed minimally,
    inadequately, and/or not at all.

    Writing is clear, concise, and well


    organized with excellent
    sentence/paragraph construction.
    Thoughts are expressed in a
    coherent and logical manner. There
    are no more than three spelling,
    grammar, or syntax errors per page
    of writing.

    Writing is mostly clear, concise, and


    well organized with good
    sentence/paragraph construction.
    Thoughts are expressed in a coherent
    and logical manner. There are no more
    than five spelling, grammar, or syntax
    errors per page of writing.

    Response is missing some


    components and/or does not fully
    meet the requirements indicated in
    the instructions. Some questions or
    parts of the assignment are not
    addressed. Some attachments and
    additional documents, if required,
    are missing or unsuitable for the
    purpose of the assignment.
    Writing is unclear and/or
    disorganized. Thoughts are not
    expressed in a logical manner.
    There are more than five spelling,
    grammar, or syntax errors per page
    of writing.

    Response shows strong evidence


    of synthesis of ideas presented and
    insights gained throughout the
    entire course. The implications of
    these insights for the respondent's
    overall teaching practice are
    thoroughly detailed, as applicable.

    Response shows evidence of synthesis


    of ideas presented and insights gained
    throughout the entire course. The
    implications of these insights for the
    respondent's overall teaching practice
    are presented, as applicable.

    Response shows little evidence of


    synthesis of ideas presented and
    insights gained throughout the
    entire course. Few implications of
    these insights for the respondent's
    overall teaching practice are
    presented, as applicable.

    Response shows no evidence of


    synthesis of ideas presented and
    insights gained throughout the entire
    course. No implications for the
    respondent's overall teaching practice
    are presented, as applicable.

    Response demonstrates an in-depth


    reflection on, and personalization
    of, the theories, concepts, and/or
    strategies presented in the course
    materials to date. Viewpoints and
    interpretations are insightful and
    well supported. Clear, detailed
    examples are provided, as
    applicable.

    Structure

    Evidence and
    Practice

    Writing is unclear and disorganized.


    Thoughts ramble and make little sense.
    There are numerous spelling,
    grammar, or syntax errors throughout
    the response.

    You might also like