Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 136 views

    Writing

    Uploaded by

    api-262368305
    The document describes a rubric for evaluating student responses. It provides criteria for assessing organization, evidence/elaboration, and conventions. For organization, the rubric evaluates elements such as structure, focus, transitions, and introduction/conclusion. For evidence/elaboration, it considers the use of sources, facts, details, and language. For conventions, it examines sentence formation, punctuation, capitalization, grammar, and spelling. The rubric assigns scores from 4 to 0 to rate responses in each category based on presence and quality of the listed elements.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Writing

    Uploaded by

    api-262368305
    136 views1 page
    The document describes a rubric for evaluating student responses. It provides criteria for assessing organization, evidence/elaboration, and conventions. For organization, the rubric evaluates elements such as structure, focus, transitions, and introduction/conclusion. For evidence/elaboration, it considers the use of sources, facts, details, and language. For conventions, it examines sentence formation, punctuation, capitalization, grammar, and spelling. The rubric assigns scores from 4 to 0 to rate responses in each category based on presence and quality of the listed elements.

    Original Title

    writing

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The document describes a rubric for evaluating student responses. It provides criteria for assessing organization, evidence/elaboration, and conventions. For organization, the rubric evaluates elements such as structure, focus, transitions, and introduction/conclusion. For evidence/elaboration, it considers the use of sources, facts, details, and language. For conventions, it examines sentence formation, punctuation, capitalization, grammar, and spelling. The rubric assigns scores from 4 to 0 to rate responses in each category based on presence and quality of the listed elements.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    136 views1 page

    Writing

    Uploaded by

    api-262368305
    The document describes a rubric for evaluating student responses. It provides criteria for assessing organization, evidence/elaboration, and conventions. For organization, the rubric evaluates elements such as structure, focus, transitions, and introduction/conclusion. For evidence/elaboration, it considers the use of sources, facts, details, and language. For conventions, it examines sentence formation, punctuation, capitalization, grammar, and spelling. The rubric assigns scores from 4 to 0 to rate responses in each category based on presence and quality of the listed elements.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 1

    Criteria

    4
    The
    response
    has
    a clear and
    Purpose &
    effective
    organizational
    structure,
    Organization

    creating a sense of unity and


    completeness. The response is
    fully sustained, and consistently
    and purposefully focused:
    -consistent use of a variety of
    transitional strategies to clarify the relationships between and
    among ideas
    -logical progression of ideas from
    beginning to end
    -effective introduction and
    conclusion
    -controlling or main idea of a
    topic is clear, focused, and
    strongly maintained

    Evidence &
    Elaboration

    Conventions

    The response provides thorough


    and convincing support/evidence
    for the controlling idea or main
    idea that includes the effective use
    of sources, facts, and details. The
    response clearly and effectively
    elaborates ideas, using precise
    language:
    -comprehensive evidence from
    sources is integrated
    -references are relevant
    -effective use of elaborative
    techniques

    The response has an evident


    organizational structure and a
    sense of completeness, though
    there may be minor flaws and
    some ideas may be loosely
    connected. The response is
    adequately sustained and generally
    focused:
    -adequate use of transitional
    strategies with some variety to
    clarify the relationships between
    and among ideas
    -adequate progression of ideas
    from beginning to end
    -adequate introduction and
    conclusion
    -controlling or main idea of a
    topic is clear and mostly
    maintained, though some loosely
    related material may be present
    The response provides adequate
    support/evidence for the
    controlling idea or main idea that
    includes the use of sources, facts,
    and details. The response
    adequately elaborates ideas,
    employing a mix of precise with
    more general language:
    -some evidence from sources is
    integrated
    -references may be general
    -adequate use of elaborative
    techniques

    The response has little or no


    discernible organizational
    structure. The response may be
    related to the topic but may
    provide little or no focus:
    -few or no transitional strategies
    are evident
    -frequent extraneous ideas are
    evident; may be formulaic
    -introduction and/or conclusion
    may be missing
    -may be very brief or have a major
    drift

    The response has little or no


    discernible organizational
    structure. The response may be
    related to the topic but may
    provide little or no focus:
    -few or no transitional strategies
    are evident
    -frequent extraneous ideas are
    evident; may be formulaic
    -introduction and/or conclusion
    may be missing
    -may be very brief or have a major
    drift

    Unintelligible
    In a language other than English
    Off-topic
    Copied text
    Off-purpose

    The response provides uneven,


    cursory support/evidence for the
    controlling idea or main idea that
    includes uneven or limited use of
    sources, facts, and details. The
    response elaborates ideas
    unevenly, using simplistic
    language:
    -evidence from sources is weakly
    integrated, vague, or imprecise
    -references may be vague,
    imprecise, or absent
    -weak or uneven use of
    elaborative techniques
    The response demonstrates an
    adequate command of
    conventions:
    -adequate use of correct sentence
    formation, punctuation,
    capitalization, usage grammar, and
    spelling
    -no systematic pattern of errors is
    displayed

    The response provides minimal


    support/evidence for the
    controlling idea or main idea that
    includes little or no use of sources,
    facts, and details. The responses
    elaborates of ideas is vague, lacks
    clarity, or is confusing:
    -evidence from the source material
    is minimal, absent, incorrect, or
    irrelevant
    -references may be absent or
    incorrect
    -minimal, if any, use of
    elaborative techniques
    The response demonstrates a
    partial command of conventions:
    -limited use of correct sentence
    formation, punctuation,
    capitalization, usage grammar, and
    spelling
    -some systematic patterns of
    errors may be displayed

    Unintelligible
    In a language other than English
    Off-topic
    Copied text
    Off-purpose

    The response demonstrates little


    or no command of conventions:
    -infrequent use of correct sentence
    formation, punctuation, capitalization, usage grammar, and
    spelling
    -systematic patterns of errors are
    displayed

    You might also like