Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 33 views

    Reserach Rubric

    Uploaded by

    api-319520170
    The document outlines a rubric for evaluating research writing. It evaluates papers on organization, development of evidence, language and vocabulary use, and conventions. For each category, it provides scoring criteria from 0 to 4, with 4 being the highest score. A score of 4 indicates strong skills in all areas, while lower scores indicate weaker or incomplete demonstration of the skills.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Reserach Rubric

    Uploaded by

    api-319520170
    33 views1 page
    The document outlines a rubric for evaluating research writing. It evaluates papers on organization, development of evidence, language and vocabulary use, and conventions. For each category, it provides scoring criteria from 0 to 4, with 4 being the highest score. A score of 4 indicates strong skills in all areas, while lower scores indicate weaker or incomplete demonstration of the skills.

    Original Title

    reserach rubric

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The document outlines a rubric for evaluating research writing. It evaluates papers on organization, development of evidence, language and vocabulary use, and conventions. For each category, it provides scoring criteria from 0 to 4, with 4 being the highest score. A score of 4 indicates strong skills in all areas, while lower scores indicate weaker or incomplete demonstration of the skills.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    33 views1 page

    Reserach Rubric

    Uploaded by

    api-319520170
    The document outlines a rubric for evaluating research writing. It evaluates papers on organization, development of evidence, language and vocabulary use, and conventions. For each category, it provides scoring criteria from 0 to 4, with 4 being the highest score. A score of 4 indicates strong skills in all areas, while lower scores indicate weaker or incomplete demonstration of the skills.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 1

    Research Writing Rubric

    Organization

    Development of
    Evidence

    Language and
    Vocabulary

    Conventions

    Main idea is clearly


    conveyed and well
    supported; response
    is focused.

    Information is
    organized logically
    into paragraphs.

    Evidence is relevant
    and thorough;
    includes facts and
    details.

    Ideas are clearly


    conveyed in a vague,
    using precise
    language and/or
    domain-specific
    vocabulary.

    Commands of
    conventions is
    strongly
    demonstrated.

    Main idea is clear,


    adequately
    supported; response
    is generally focused.

    Information is
    organized in
    paragraphs but
    some ideas are
    disconnected.

    Evidence is adequate
    and includes facts
    and details.

    Ideas are adequately


    conveyed, using both
    precise and more
    general language;
    may include domainspecific vocabulary.

    Commands of
    conventions is
    sufficiently
    demonstrated.

    Main idea is
    somewhat supported;
    lacks focus or
    includes unnecessary
    material.

    Information is
    presented in an
    acceptable order but
    paragraphs are used
    inconsistently.

    Evidence is
    incomplete;
    insufficient use of
    facts and details.

    Ideas are unevenly


    conveyed, using
    overly-simplistic
    language; lacks
    domain-specific
    vocabulary.

    Command of
    conventions is
    uneven.

    Response may be
    unfocused; confusing,
    main idea
    insufficiently
    supported.

    Organization is poor
    or nonexistent.

    Evidence is poor or
    nonexistent.

    Ideas are conveyed


    in a vague, unclear,
    or confusing manner.

    There is very little


    command of
    conventions.

    The response shows no evidence of the ability to construct a coherent informative essay using information from
    sources.

    Score

    Focus

    You might also like