Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Performance Task Part 2 Rubric

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 2

4-Point

Informative-Explanatory
Performance Task Writing Rubric (Grades 4)
(Derived from Smarter Balance Assessment Consortium)

Score
Main Idea/Focus and
Organization

4
The topic is clearly
stated, focused,
strongly maintained
and communicated
clearly within the
purpose, audience,
and task
The response is
clear and organized
Clearly explains the
relationships
between and among
ideas

Evidence/Elaboratio
n

The response shows


a strong and
effective use of
sources, facts,
details

3
The response is
adequately stated,
generally focused,
mostly
maintained ,and the
topic is adequate
within the purpose,
audience, and task

2
The response is
somewhat stated
and is loses focus in
areas; the topic or
main idea may be
unclear and/or
somewhat
unfocused

The response has


minor mistakes and
some ideas may be
loosely connected

The response is
somewhat
organized/may lack
focus

Adequately
explains the
relationship
between and among
ideas

Weakly explains the


relationship
between and among
ideas

The response shows


adequate use of
sources, facts,
details

The response shows


weakness in ability
to use sources,
facts, details
effectively

1
The response may
be related to the
topic but may
provide little or no
focus

0
The response does
not answer the
question/address
any part of the
question(s) asked or
is left blank

The response is
disorganized and
difficult to follow
Does not explain a
relationship
between among
ideas/no
explanation of ideas
present

The response
includes little or no
use of sources,
facts, details

The response is offtopic, not related to


the prompt, or left
blank

Response is clearly
stated; uses
specific, sciencecontent vocabulary

Response
adequately
expresses ideas;
uses some sciencecontent vocabulary
mixed with general
vocabulary

Response somewhat
expresses ideas;
uses simple
vocabulary or very
little sciencecontent vocabulary

Response is
confusing; uses
science-content
vocabulary
incorrectly or not at
all

You might also like