Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 12 views

    Content Rubric: Points Description

    Uploaded by

    Kevin Mirasol
    The document outlines a rubric for evaluating content with points ranging from 1 to 4. A score of 4 reflects clear focus, logical organization and progression of ideas, specific and developed details, precise vocabulary, and fluent sentences. A score of 3 is similar but may have minor lapses. A score of 2 may have vague topic, lack relationship among ideas, be minimally complete, have weak support and general details. A score of 1 has unclear or confusing topic and organization and lacks precise vocabulary and fluent sentences.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Content Rubric: Points Description

    Uploaded by

    Kevin Mirasol
    12 views3 pages
    The document outlines a rubric for evaluating content with points ranging from 1 to 4. A score of 4 reflects clear focus, logical organization and progression of ideas, specific and developed details, precise vocabulary, and fluent sentences. A score of 3 is similar but may have minor lapses. A score of 2 may have vague topic, lack relationship among ideas, be minimally complete, have weak support and general details. A score of 1 has unclear or confusing topic and organization and lacks precise vocabulary and fluent sentences.

    Original Description:

    rubric

    Original Title

    Content Rubric[1]

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The document outlines a rubric for evaluating content with points ranging from 1 to 4. A score of 4 reflects clear focus, logical organization and progression of ideas, specific and developed details, precise vocabulary, and fluent sentences. A score of 3 is similar but may have minor lapses. A score of 2 may have vague topic, lack relationship among ideas, be minimally complete, have weak support and general details. A score of 1 has unclear or confusing topic and organization and lacks precise vocabulary and fluent sentences.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    12 views3 pages

    Content Rubric: Points Description

    Uploaded by

    Kevin Mirasol
    The document outlines a rubric for evaluating content with points ranging from 1 to 4. A score of 4 reflects clear focus, logical organization and progression of ideas, specific and developed details, precise vocabulary, and fluent sentences. A score of 3 is similar but may have minor lapses. A score of 2 may have vague topic, lack relationship among ideas, be minimally complete, have weak support and general details. A score of 1 has unclear or confusing topic and organization and lacks precise vocabulary and fluent sentences.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 3

    Content Rubric

    Points

    Description
    Topic/subject is clear, though it may or may not be
    explicitly stated
    Maintains focus on topic/subject throughout the
    response
    Organizational structure establishes relationships
    between and among ideas and/or events

    Consists of a logical progression of ideas and/or events


    and is unified and complete
    Support and elaboration are related to and supportive
    of the topic/subject
    Consists of specific, developed details
    Exhibits skillful use of vocabulary that is precise and
    purposeful
    Demonstrates skillful use of sentence fluency

    3
    Topic/subject is generally clear, though it may or may
    not be explicitly stated
    May exhibit minor lapses in focus on topic/subject
    Organizational structure establishes relationships
    between and among ideas and/or events, although
    minor lapses may be present
    Consists of a logical progression of ideas and/or events
    and is reasonably complete, although minor lapses may
    be present
    Support and elaboration may have minor weaknesses
    in relatedness to and support of the topic/subject
    Consists of some specific details
    Exhibits reasonable use of vocabulary that is precise

    and purposeful
    Demonstrates reasonable use of sentence fluency

    Topic/subject may be vague


    May lose or may exhibit major lapses in focus on
    topic/subject
    Organizational structure may establish little
    relationship between and among ideas and/or events
    May have major lapses in the logical progression of
    ideas and/or events and is minimally complete
    2
    Support and elaboration may have major weaknesses
    in relatedness to and support of the topic/subject
    Consists of general and/or undeveloped details, which
    may be presented in a list-like fashion
    Exhibits minimal use of vocabulary that is precise and
    purposeful
    Demonstrates minimal use of sentence fluency

    Topic/subject is unclear or confusing


    May fail to establish focus on topic/subject
    Organizational structure may not establish connection
    between and among ideas and/or events

    May consist of ideas and/or events that are presented


    in a random fashion and is incomplete or confusing
    Support and elaboration attempts to support the
    topic/subject but may be unrelated or confusing
    Consists of sparse details
    Lacks use of vocabulary that is precise and purposeful
    May not demonstrate sentence fluency

    You might also like