Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 8K views

    3 Methods of Assessing Affective Learning Outcomes

    Uploaded by

    api-298323325
    This document discusses methods for assessing affective learning outcomes, including selected-response formats, rating scales, semantic differential scales, checklists, and peer ratings. Rating scales use categories to gather quantitative attributes and opinions in social sciences. Semantic differential scales use pairs of adjectives to measure degrees of agreement on feelings and beliefs. Checklists consist of items marked as present or absent to describe affective traits. Peer ratings ask students to assess classmates' behaviors, which can be analyzed using frequency nomination and sociograms. Examples of these assessment methods are provided.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    3 Methods of Assessing Affective Learning Outcomes

    Uploaded by

    api-298323325
    8K views15 pages
    This document discusses methods for assessing affective learning outcomes, including selected-response formats, rating scales, semantic differential scales, checklists, and peer ratings. Rating scales use categories to gather quantitative attributes and opinions in social sciences. Semantic differential scales use pairs of adjectives to measure degrees of agreement on feelings and beliefs. Checklists consist of items marked as present or absent to describe affective traits. Peer ratings ask students to assess classmates' behaviors, which can be analyzed using frequency nomination and sociograms. Examples of these assessment methods are provided.

    Original Title

    3 methods of assessing affective learning outcomes

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document discusses methods for assessing affective learning outcomes, including selected-response formats, rating scales, semantic differential scales, checklists, and peer ratings. Rating scales use categories to gather quantitative attributes and opinions in social sciences. Semantic differential scales use pairs of adjectives to measure degrees of agreement on feelings and beliefs. Checklists consist of items marked as present or absent to describe affective traits. Peer ratings ask students to assess classmates' behaviors, which can be analyzed using frequency nomination and sociograms. Examples of these assessment methods are provided.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
    8K views15 pages

    3 Methods of Assessing Affective Learning Outcomes

    Uploaded by

    api-298323325
    This document discusses methods for assessing affective learning outcomes, including selected-response formats, rating scales, semantic differential scales, checklists, and peer ratings. Rating scales use categories to gather quantitative attributes and opinions in social sciences. Semantic differential scales use pairs of adjectives to measure degrees of agreement on feelings and beliefs. Checklists consist of items marked as present or absent to describe affective traits. Peer ratings ask students to assess classmates' behaviors, which can be analyzed using frequency nomination and sociograms. Examples of these assessment methods are provided.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
    You are on page 1of 15

    Methods of Assessing

    Affective Learning
    Outcomes

    B. Selected-Response
    Format
    There are three types of
    selected-response
    format.
    These are Rating Scale,
    Semantic Differential Scale
    and Checklist.

    Rating Scale
    Rating Scale is a set of
    categories designed to gather
    information
    or
    quantitative
    attributes in social sciences.

    Strongl
    y

    Opinions

    1. Mathematics is a boring and dull


    subject.
    2. I enjoy studying Mathematics at
    school.
    3. Mathematics is an important subject
    for my future career.
    4. Mathematics is a difficult subject for
    me.
    5. I am confident that I will get a high
    grade in mathematics.
    6. Mathematics does not scare me at
    all.
    7. Mathematics is a very interesting
    subject.
    8. I am happier in mathematics than
    my other subjects.
    9. I believe I am god at solving
    mathematical problems.

    Agree
    (SA)
    5

    Agre
    e (A)

    Neutr
    al (N)

    Disagr
    ee(D)

    Strongl
    y
    Disagre
    e (SD)
    1

    Semantic Differential
    Scale
    Semantic Differential Scale
    uses a pair of adjectives to
    provide connections with
    feelings,
    beliefs,
    and
    opinions
    that
    can
    be
    measured by degrees of
    agreement that show both
    opposite
    directions
    and
    intensity.

    Examples of Semantic Differential Scale:

    Mathematics Test
    Easy __ __ __ __ __ __ __ Difficult
    3
    2
    1
    0
    1
    2
    3
    Basketball Player
    Weak __ __ __ __ __ __ __ Strong
    3
    2
    1
    0
    1
    2
    3

    Checklist
    It consists of simple items
    that the student or teacher
    marks as present or
    absent of certain attribute
    that describes the affective
    traits.

    Sample Checklist for Structured


    Observation in a Classroom
    Observations
    1. Students will attend classes on time.
    2. Students will submit assignments on time.
    3. Students will actively participate in the
    classroom decisions.
    4. Students will follow instructions during
    examination.
    5. Students will ask questions during classroom
    discussion.

    Yes

    No

    3. Peer Rating
    Peer Rating is a method
    that asks the student to
    assess or judge their
    classmates behavior.

    Frequency
    nomination
    and
    Sociogram is used to analyze the
    results of peer rating. And there are
    also two approaches of obtaining
    the peer rating: the Guess-who
    approach and the Sociometric
    approach.

    Guess-Who Form
    Direction: Write the name/s of your classmate/s who is
    described in the following questions. Your answer must
    remain confidential. No other students shall see your
    answer. Student/s can be named more than once in each
    category.
    1. Who is the most willing to work with others?
    ________________
    2. Which student is concerned more about others?
    ______________
    3. Who asks much help about his/her assignment?
    ______________
    4. Which students is willing to cooperate with others?
    ___________

    On the other hand, Socio


    metric approach is used to
    assess social structure of the
    class and interaction patterns
    among the students(McMillan,
    2001). This pattern allows the
    teacher to learn about social
    acceptance
    and
    the
    liking
    patterns of the students.

    Activity:
    In a one-half (crosswise) sheet
    of paper, choose whether you
    Construct a checklist for a Group
    Project Presentation or a rating
    scale measuring students study
    habits. You will only be given
    five(5) minutes to accomplish
    your task.

    References:
    Gabuyo, Y. A. (2012). Assessment of
    Learning 1. Manila, Philippines: Rex Book
    Store.
    Raagas, E. L. (2010). Assessment and
    Evaluation of Student Learning: Concepts
    and Applications (Third Edition). Cagayan
    de Oro City: Datstat Analysis Center.

    The End
    Reported by:
    Ann Tonette A. Zaspa

    You might also like