Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 25 views

    5 Scoring Rubrics

    Uploaded by

    api-298323325
    This document contains two rubrics for evaluating performances: a holistic scoring rubric for jazz chant and an analytic scoring rubric for interpretative storytelling. The jazz chant rubric evaluates voice quality, choreography, and timely submission of lyrics on a scale of 75 to 99. The storytelling rubric evaluates delivery, technicalities, originality, and appeal across five mastery levels using a heart rating system. Both rubrics provide criteria for strong performances and suggestions for areas of improvement.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    5 Scoring Rubrics

    Uploaded by

    api-298323325
    25 views3 pages
    This document contains two rubrics for evaluating performances: a holistic scoring rubric for jazz chant and an analytic scoring rubric for interpretative storytelling. The jazz chant rubric evaluates voice quality, choreography, and timely submission of lyrics on a scale of 75 to 99. The storytelling rubric evaluates delivery, technicalities, originality, and appeal across five mastery levels using a heart rating system. Both rubrics provide criteria for strong performances and suggestions for areas of improvement.

    Original Title

    5 scoring rubrics

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document contains two rubrics for evaluating performances: a holistic scoring rubric for jazz chant and an analytic scoring rubric for interpretative storytelling. The jazz chant rubric evaluates voice quality, choreography, and timely submission of lyrics on a scale of 75 to 99. The storytelling rubric evaluates delivery, technicalities, originality, and appeal across five mastery levels using a heart rating system. Both rubrics provide criteria for strong performances and suggestions for areas of improvement.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    25 views3 pages

    5 Scoring Rubrics

    Uploaded by

    api-298323325
    This document contains two rubrics for evaluating performances: a holistic scoring rubric for jazz chant and an analytic scoring rubric for interpretative storytelling. The jazz chant rubric evaluates voice quality, choreography, and timely submission of lyrics on a scale of 75 to 99. The storytelling rubric evaluates delivery, technicalities, originality, and appeal across five mastery levels using a heart rating system. Both rubrics provide criteria for strong performances and suggestions for areas of improvement.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    You are on page 1of 3

    HOLISTIC SCORING RUBRIC FOR JAZZ CHANT

    INDICATORS
    Voice quality ranges from loud to soft
    that evokes very remarkable and highly
    refined appeal.
    Choreography conjures very appropriate
    and astonishing movements.
    Has submitted the lyrics a day before the
    performance.
    Voice quality ranges from loud to soft
    that evokes satisfactorily remarkable and
    refined appeal.
    Choreography conjures appropriate and
    astonishing movements.
    Has submitted the lyrics on the day of
    the performance.
    Voice quality ranges from loud to soft
    that evokes pleasant and conceivable
    appeal.
    Choreography conjures appropriate and
    astonishing movements in majority of
    the parts of the performance.
    Has submitted the lyrics after the
    performance.
    Voice quality ranges from loud to soft
    that evokes unpleasant appeal.
    Choreography conjures appropriate and
    astonishing movements in some of the
    parts of the performance.
    Has submitted the lyrics 2-3 days after
    the performance.
    Voice quality ranges from loud to soft
    that evokes distracting appeal.
    Choreography conjures some appropriate
    and predictable movements.
    Has submitted the lyrics 4 days after the
    performance.
    Suggestions for Improvement:

    EQUIVALENT
    SCORE
    94 99

    88 - 93

    82 - 87

    76 - 81

    75 below

    _______________________________________________________________________________________
    _______________________________________________________________________________________
    _______________________________________________________________________________________
    ____________________________________________________________________________________

    Criticized by: ___________________

    ANALYTIC SCORING RUBRIC FOR


    INTERPRETATIVE STORYTELLING
    Criteria
    Mastery

    Delivery

    Technicalit
    ies
    Originality
    of the
    Piece

    Appeal

    All the parts


    of the story
    were narrated
    very smoothly
    and stylishly
    maintaining
    peoples rush.

    All the parts


    of the story
    were narrated
    smoothly and
    stylishly
    maintaining
    majority of
    peoples rush.

    All the parts


    of the story
    were narrated
    in a
    satisfactory
    smooth and
    stylish
    manner
    maintaining
    half of
    peoples rush.
    Facial
    Expressions,
    gestures and
    voice have
    been used
    and
    integrated in
    a consistent,
    organized and
    acceptablystructured
    striking
    manner.

    Facial
    Expressions,
    gestures and
    voice have
    been used
    and
    integrated in
    a very
    consistent,
    wellorganized and
    vastlystructured
    striking
    manner.
    Diction and
    grammar is
    superb.
    The piece was
    written by the
    storyteller
    himself to
    evoke
    extremelystirring
    ambience.

    Induces very
    catchy
    appeal.

    Facial
    Expressions,
    gestures and
    voice have
    been used
    and
    integrated in
    a consistent,
    organized and
    satisfactorilystructured
    striking
    manner.

    Diction and
    grammar is
    satisfactory.
    Majority of
    the parts of
    the piece was
    written by the
    storyteller
    himself to
    evoke
    satisfactorilystirring
    ambience.
    Induces
    satisfactorily
    catchy
    appeal.

    Total
    Hearts
    Description:
    25 - Prototypical
    22 - 24 - Very Satisfactory
    19 - 21 - Satisfactory

    All the parts


    of the story
    were narrated
    distractingly
    maintaining
    quarter of
    peoples rush.

    Few of the
    parts of the
    story were
    narrated
    distractingly
    killing
    peoples rush.

    Facial
    Expressions,
    gestures and
    voice have
    been used
    and
    integrated in
    a consistent,
    somewhat
    organized,
    unpleasant
    manner.

    Facial
    Expressions,
    gestures and
    voice have
    been used
    and
    integrated in
    a consistent,
    somewhat
    organized,
    disrupting
    manner.

    Diction and
    grammar is
    good.
    Some of the
    parts of the
    piece were
    written by the
    storyteller
    himself to
    evoke stirring
    ambience.

    Diction and
    grammar is
    fair.
    Few of the
    parts of the
    piece were
    written by the
    storyteller
    himself to
    evoke classic
    ambience.

    Induces
    acceptably
    catchy
    appeal.

    Induces
    ambiguous
    appeal.

    Diction and
    grammar is
    poor.
    Other people
    had written
    the piece to
    evoke a
    surprise
    ambience.

    Induces very
    spiteful
    appeal.

    16 - 18 - Good
    11 - 15 - Fair
    7 - 10 - Poor
    6 below - Pitiful
    ___________________

    Criticized by:

    You might also like