MTA Capital Program 2015-19
MTA Capital Program 2015-19
MTA Capital Program 2015-19
2015-2019
CAPITAL
PROGRAM
mta.info/capital
As Proposed to the MTA Board October 28, 2015
2015-2019
CAPITAL
PROGRAM
mta.info/capital
As Proposed to the MTA Board October 28, 2015
1
New York never stops. From morning-rush commuters to late-night clubgoers, from school children on subways to seniors on buses, millions of
people rely on the Metropolitan Transportation Authority to get them
through their daily lives. Without a robust and well-maintained network
of railroads, subways, bus routes, bridges, and tunnels, New York as we
know it could not function.
I first joined the MTA in 1982 to help rebuild an aging network that struggled to move 5.3 million people every day.
Today, farsighted investments by New York leaders over the past three decades have revitalized the MTA network
the engine for a New York metropolitan regional economy that accounts for 11 percent of our nations GDP and now
moves 8.7 million customers a day.
The key to keeping this system moving safely and reliably and to keeping our region vibrant has been the MTAs
Capital Program.
Every five years, the MTA takes a hard look at its system and its infrastructure to identify and prioritize the investments that will be essential to renew, enhance, and expand the system to meet the changing needs of the region,
its economy, and its residents.
The first MTA Capital Program was launched in 1982. That infusion of resources transformed a declining system
and revitalized New York City and State, and we havent stopped investing in our network since. More than 30 years
and $115 billion later, the Capital Program has given us a system we can depend on 24 hours every day of the year.
Take our previous 2010-2014 Capital Program: We bought new subway cars, new commuter railroad cars, new
local buses, and new express buses. We began installing modern, Communications-Based Train Control signals
for faster and better service. We brought real-time service information to much of our network. We built new rail
lines and connections that will serve New York for generations to come. And since Superstorm Sandy ravaged our
network, we committed more than $2 billion to fix the damage and fortify against future storms.
With a fully-funded 2015-2019 Capital Program, well continue making our system more resilient against big
storms. Well bring Positive Train Controla state-of-the-art signal systemto Metro-North and the Long Island
Rail Road. Well continue introducing new routes for Select Bus Service, which uses off-board fare collection,
low-floor, high-capacity buses, and dedicated bus lanes to cut travel times by nearly 20 percent.
Well replace 73 miles of subway track with safer, smoother track. And well complete hundreds of similar projects
that keep our customers safe and on time. These types of projects may not be glamorous, but together with the
normal scheduled replacement of our trains and buses, they are the key to moving 8.7 million people every day,
safely and reliably.
Thomas F. Prendergast
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Metropolitan Transportation Authority
Asset Renewal
All five of our operating agenciesNew York City Transit, Metro-North Railroad, Long Island Rail Road, MTA Bus
Company, and MTA Bridges and Tunnelsperform comprehensive asset condition inventories to identify assets
needing renewal. The results inform investments in the 2015-2019 Capital Program that promote safe and reliable
service, including investments in fleets, track, signals, and power. Over the past 30 years, renewal investments
have transformed the MTA system, and these investments remain our primary focus in the years to come.
Vision
Investments that enhance and expand the system are developed through a comprehensive analysis of regional
trends, including travel patterns, shifts in employment, and technological developments. These lead to many of
the investments in the 2015-2019 Program, from expanded Select Bus Service to contactless fare payment to
more real-time travel information.
*The latest 2015-2034 Twenty-Year Capital Needs Assessment was released in October 2013 and is available for download at mta.info/capital.
10
90 miles
70 miles
120 miles
700
2,411
1,704
Stations
Commuter
Fleet
Track Miles
6,465
5,690
Subway
Cars
Bridges and
Tunnels
Buses
11
Enhanced Security
12
Help Points
These high-tech intercoms are already installed in
more than 200 subway stations, making our subway
system safer and easier to use. By the end of the year,
well approach 300 stations with Help Points. The
2015-2019 Program will complete the rollout of Help
Points throughout the subway system, to every one of
our 469 stations.
and Reliability
Reliability is the second highest priority of the 2015-2019 Program, because in a place as
crowded as New York, its the only way to move so many people quickly and efficiently, 24/7.
Here are some of the ways well keep our system reliable through the 2015-2019 Capital Program.
New Fleet
Capital investments help us give you the most comfortable, dependable, and technologically-advanced
vehicles in the business. Through the 2015-2019
Program, well replace aging M-3 commuter rail trains
while adding hundreds of state-of-the-art, clean-fuel
technology buses and high-tech R-211 subway trains.
Track Rehabilitation
Well continue to roll out low-vibration subway track
for a smoother, quieter ride. Our commuter railroads
will continue their cyclical track programs, using hightech measuring equipment to help us find defects
and prioritize repairs.
13
14
Ridership is up
5.4
million
1992
7.7
million
2002
61%
8.7
million
2014
Here are just some of the ways well use the 2015-2019 Capital Program to prepare for and create
growth, while meeting our customers expectations:
Continue the progress weve made on two of the largest transportation projects in the nation: the next phase
of the Second Avenue Subway and East Side Access, which will bring the LIRR into Grand Central Terminal.
Both of these projects will add capacity to our system, and improve the reliability of our service by giving
customers new ways to get where theyre goingto, from, and within New York City.
Complete the Long Island Rail Road Double Track project, which will allow us to add off-peak service in both
directions for intra-Island commuting.
Replace our 1930s-era subway signals with Communications-Based Train Control, increasing capacity and
reliability while improving safety.
Introduce a host of service improvements, including a new fare payment system, mobile onboard ticketing,
and more real-time service information with new apps to match.
Continue to modernize our system with new trains, buses, and Help Points.
Review Transportation Reinvention Commission recommendations, so Capital Program investments maximize
economic growth and better address the challenges of climate change and regional population growth.
15
16
But all the environmental improvements were making are just a drop in the bucket compared to what we do for
our environment every single day. In fact, every year, the MTA allows our region to avoid almost 17 million metric
tons of greenhouse gas emissions. Thats equal to more than three times the entire annual greenhouse gas
emissions of San Francisco.
Our mass transit network isnt the only reason New York is so environmentally friendly. People also need to want
to use it. It needs to work well and be reliable enough to get people where they need to gosafely and on time,
every day. Thats whyif you want to invest in the sustainability of our regionthe best way to do it is by supporting
the investments that maintain and improve our entire system: the MTAs Capital Program.
17
17
Budget
Highlights
Category
Budget
Highlights
Line
Equipment
$377m
Subway
Cars
$2,956m
Stations
$2,781m
$927m
$1,845m
$353m
18
Category
Signals &
Communications
Budget
$2,766m
Highlights
Category
Budget
Highlights
Traction
Power
$773m
Service
Vehicles
$222m
Misc.
$860m
$386m
Help Points
Help Points make traveling on the
subway safer and easier, providing
information to customers and
assistance in times of emergency.
19
Buses
Budget
$1,020m
Highlights
$1,602m
Category
Budget
Highlights
Depots
$582m
20
Better Design
Budget
Buses
$244m
Highlights
$376m
Category
Budget
Highlights
Depots &
Facilities
$132m
21
Budget
Stations
$296m
Highlights
Category
Budget
Highlights
Communications &
Signals
$390m
$211m
22
Category
Budget
Highlights
Category
Line
Structures
$164m
$860m
Power
Budget
$250m
Highlights
$165m
Second Track
23
Budget
Highlights
Category
Budget
Highlights
$177m
GCT
Stations &
Parking/
Strategic
Facilities
$215m
$472m
24
Customer
Communications
Through the 2015-2019
Program, Metro-North will
improve customer communications at East of Hudson stations,
including: real-time information
on train arrivals and departures,
visual information displays,
an improved public address
system, and safety and
security enhancements.
Category
Budget
Highlights
Category
East of
Hudson Track
& Structures
$401m
West of
Hudson Track
& Structures
Budget
$57m
$101m
Highlights
Communications &
Signals
$194m
$173m
25
Budget
Highlights
Category
Budget
Highlights
BronxWhitestone
Bridge
$137m
Rehabilitate miscellaneous
structures - $29m
Henry
Hudson
Bridge
$243m
$56m
Rockaway
Crossings
(Cross Bay and
Marine Parkway
Bridges)
$64m
$747m
26
Category
Budget
Highlights
Category
Budget
Highlights
Throgs Neck
Bridge
$578m
Agency Wide
$386m
VerrazanoNarrows
Bridge
$530m
27
Network Expansion:
28
29
2015-2019
28,956
6,375
2,492
MTA/TBTA Bonds
8,165
8,336
3,588
28,956
The Capital Program is supported by a combination of local fundingincluding City, State and MTA sourcesand
federal sources. Taken together, these resources are expected to provide $29 billion to deliver the 2015-2019
Capital Program.
30
hDrake
drakeMTA Capital Plan 2015-2019
(Table of Contents)
2015-2019
33
34
Table of Contents
Executive Summary.
Overview....
37
Investment Summary.. .
39
40
Program Evolution....
42
44
47
MTA Core..
49
49
75
M TA M etro-North Railroad
101
M TA Bus Company
123
M TA Interagency
131
157
181
201
M TA M etro-North Railroad..........
209
M TA Bus Company.. ..
217
35
36
M TA Interagency........
218
221
228
237
Underground Gallery, 2009 Carlo Stanga, Commissioned by MTA Arts & Design
Overview
2015-2019
38
Investment Summary
The proposed MTA 2015-2019 Capital Program encompasses $29 billion of investments that renew, enhance, and
expand the MTA network. The majority of the plan focuses on renewing the system to promote safe and reliable
service. Enhancements are targeted toward improving system capabilities and the customer experience. Expansion
projects extend the reach of the network to address evolving regional mobility needs.
The plan is organized into a MTA Capital Program Review Board (CPRB) portion that is subject to CPRB review and a
Bridges and Tunnels portion that is not subject to CPRB review (Table 1). The CPRB portion is subdivided into core
investments that renew and enhance, and expansion investments that extend the MTA network. The Agency
sections of this book detail the projects included in the plan.
Table 1
MTA 2015-2019 Capital Program All Agency Summary ($ in millions)
Proposed
2015-2019
CPRB Core Capital Program
New York City Transit
$15,849
2,835
Metro-North Railroad
2,321
MTA Bus
376
MTA Interagency
264
$21,644
Network Expansion
4,456
$26,100
2,856
$28,956
39
Program Funding
Funds currently projected to be available for the proposed 2015-2019 MTA Capital Program total $29.0 billion
(Table 2) and are described in the following narrative.
Table 2
MTA 2015-2019 Capital Program Funding Sources ($ in millions)
Proposed
2015-2019
Total 2015-2019 Program Costs
$28,956
$6,275
100
MTA Bonds
5,889
1,846
8,336
2,492
600
562
$2,856
$28,956
$0
Funding Sources
Federal Formula, Flexible and Miscellaneous
The proposed 2015-2019 Capital Program was to coincide with the reauthorization of Federal transportation
funding that was scheduled to begin in FFY2015 (October 2014). The MTA, and its sister transit agencies across the
country, have been seeking significant increases in federal transit assistance, consistent with the Federal Transit
Administration (FTA) recognition that a substantial backlog of renewal investments must be addressed to achieve a
state of good repair (SGR) across the country. The current two-year MAP-21 authorization has been extended to
40
October 29, 2015. However, since Congress has yet to advance a multi-year authorization bill, MTA assumptions for
federal formula, flexible and miscellaneous funding do not reflect an increase in annual transit subsidies, keeping
them flat at recent levels for a total of $6.3 billion.
Federal Core Capacity Grant Program
The MTA currently assumes $100 million in Section 5309 Core Capacity funding for the Canarsie Line Power and
Station Improvements project, subject to further guidance and approval of the FTA.
MTA Bonds
The proposed plan includes $5.7 billion in new MTA bonding capacity, as reflected in the MTA July financial plan for
2016-2019. This category also includes $200 million in bond proceeds generated by savings due to the low-interest
FRA Railroad Rehabilitation & Improvement Financing (RRIF) loan supporting Positive Train Control (PTC) projects
(previously accounted for in Other MTA Sources).
PAYGO Capital
The proposed plan includes $1.6 billion in pay-as-you-go (PAYGO) capital, leveraging new debt service capacity until
fully consumed by the debt service needs of MTA bonds. An additional $200 million in PAYGO is made available by
the reduction in the needs (and required funding) for the B&T 2015-2019 Capital Program
State of New York Capital
The capital plan includes $1 billion in capital funding from the State of New York to support core program projects
($750 million) and the Penn Station Access project ($250 million). An additional $7.3 billion will be provided by the
State for the proposed 2015-2019 plan.
City of New York Capital
The proposed plan currently includes $492 million in annual capital contributions from the City of New York (for a
total of $2.46 billion over the five year period), reflecting a 392% increase above contributions in the prior Capital
Program, as well as $32 million in City matching funds to federal grants supporting the MTA Bus Capital Program.
Asset Sales / Leases
Funds reflect proceeds from East/West Rail Yards Payments in Lieu of Sales Tax/PILOST ($190 million), proceeds
from the proposed development of MTA Madison Avenue property pursuant to the Vanderbilt Corridor zoning ($110
million), and resources from the disposition of assets including properties jointly owned with the City of New York
($300 million).
Other MTA S ources
The MTA currently anticipates $562 million in other bond and PAYGO sources, primarily ($530 million) from savings
due to the anticipated issuance of lower cost Payroll Mobility Tax (PMT)-backed bonds.
Bridges and Tunnels Program Funding
The proposed fund sources for MTA Bridges and Tunnels total $2.9 billion and include $2.3 billion in TBTA bonds
and $580 million in PAYGO capital.
41
Program Evolution
In October 2014, MTA submitted to New York State our original $29 billion 2015-2019 Capital Program. Governor
Cuomo challenged the MTA to cut the Programs cost by 6 to 8 percent without impacting benefits or eliminating the
projects that are critical to the reliability of the MTA system. MTA is planning to do that in the following ways:
Transit. Through FASTRACK, an entire subway line is shut down for about four consecutive nights, giving workers
uninterrupted access to the system and allowing them to accomplish in a few nights what would normally take
months. The program is generating huge productivity gainsand savings. To accomplish further savings, MTA will
add more Capital Program work to FASTRACK closures. In addition, MTA will undertake intensive coordination to
finish multiple projects and maximize the use of piggy backing on the same track outage. MTA is also lookingon a
case by case basisto close entire stations to get work done faster and more efficiently. This will make stations
cleaner and safer, while reducing our costs. Similarlyfor select complex infrastructure rehabilitationsMTA is
considering full or partial line closures to get work done faster and cheaper. For these projects, MTA will survey
customers to determine their preferences, so we can move forward with their support.
Table 3
MTA 2015-2019 Capital Program Efficiencies Reductions ($ in millions)
Proposed
2015-2019
Agency
Reductions
($1,273)
(285)
Metro-North Railroad
(232)
MTA Bus
MTA Capital Construction / Interagency
Bridges and Tunnels
Total
Percent Reduction
(61)
(1,040)
(200)
($3,090)
10%
43
2015-2034
Twenty-Year Capital Needs Assessment
Asset Inventory
and Condition
Assessment
Strategic Vision
44
2015-2034
Investment Strategies
& Needs
2015-2019
Five-Year Capital Program
2015-2019
Program of Projects
45
46
47
48
2015-2019
Category
Assets
Subway Cars
Buses
4,475 Buses
Passenger Stations
469 Stations
Track
Line Equipment
Line Structures
Power
Shops & Yards
220 Substations
42 Shops
24 Yards
Depots
Service Vehicles
23 Bus Depots
640 Work Vehicles
496 Work Trains
50
64 Rail Cars
51
Table 5
New York City Transit Proposed 2015 -2019 Capital Program by Category ($ in millions)
Proposed
2015-2019
Percent
$2,956
19%
Buses
1,020
6%
Passenger Stations
2,781
18%
Track
1,845
12%
Line Equipment
377
2%
Line Structures
927
6%
2,766
17%
Power
773
5%
353
2%
Depots
582
4%
Service Vehicles
222
1%
Miscellaneous
860
5%
386
2%
$15,849
100%
Category
Subway Cars
Total
Numbers may not total due to rounding
52
Program Evolution
This plan for New York City Transit totals $15.849 billion, which is a reduction of $1.273 billion compared to the
previous NYC Transit 2015-2019 capital plan proposal that was submitted in September 2014. This $1.273 billion
reduction is the net effect of several factors:
Program Efficiencies
The plan assumes projected savings to be realized via more efficient design and construction of certain types of
capital projects. The efficiencies that will be employed to generate these savings include:
Coordination of multiple projects on the same section of track to minimize service diversions and reduce
agency support costs;
Component repair, rather than complete replacement, of certain capital assets;
Alternative procurement strategies, such as separate contracts for furnishing and installation of equipment
and design-build;
Use of standard, off-the-shelf specifications, to the extent possible; and
Exploration of new construction technologies.
Table 6 shows the elements in which these savings are assumed. Projects in these elements that are expected to
realize savings via efficiencies are starred (**) in the blue pages listing of projects. The budgets of starred projects
have been reduced by a fixed percentage (noted in Table 6) as compared to the agencys best estimate at the time
of this plan resubmission. New York City Transit will strive to meet these reduced budgets, by incorporating efficiency
strategies during project design. Some projects may yield greater savings opportunities than others, but achieving
the overall savings by element, as listed in Table 6, is the agencys goal.
Revised Estimates
In the year that has elapsed since the September 2014 plan submission, projects have advanced further in the
design process, resulting in better cost estimate information upon which to establish project budgets.
Priority Changes
NYC Transit has reevaluated all projects in the plan to consider new information available since September 2014
and confirm that all projects are critical to advance in the 2015-2019 timeframe. A number of projects were
identified that should wait until after 2019 due to scheduling concerns and that do not impact operations and
maintenance. Likewise, in a few cases, field conditions were found to exhibit less deterioratio n than expected and
can be remedied without capital investment. At the same time, however, a small number of projects have been
added to the plan resubmission to address newly emerging needs that had not been identified prior to September
2014.
Table 6
New York City Transit Cap ital Program Projected Savings Due to Program Efficiencies ($ in millions)
Element Type of Project
% Red.
Assumed
Savings
Likely Efficiencies
15%
15%
15%
8%
T70902 Substations
10%
15%
15%
10%
10%
8 Alternative procurement strategies; refinement of lifecycle extension strategies; use of standard, off-the shelf
specifications
15%
10%
Total
Numbers may not total due to rounding
54
Major Investments
Priorities for the 2015-2019 Capital Program stem from the agencys 2015-2034 Twenty-Year Capital Needs
Assessment. Built on the foundation of a comprehensive asset condition inventory, the assessment identified a
significant need to modernize signal systems as well as the traditional investment areas of rolling stock (cars and
buses), track and switches, and passenger stations.
The Signals and Communications category continues to be one of the largest categories, both in terms of identified
needs as well as proposed investment. This is a reflection of the safety and operational importance of the signal
system coupled with the age profile and conditions of existing installations.
Primary elements of this investment program include investments to maintain core infrastructure and smart
investments that will enhance mobility, customer satisfaction, safety, and security. Within these elements, highlights
of the proposed 2015-2019 Capital Program include:
Signals
Primary Operating Assets (Fleets and Track)
Passenger Stations
Component Repairs
Communication Technology Enhancements
The discussion below, which elaborates on these investment priorities, provides a capsule of the twenty-year
perspective as well as the proposed investments included in the 2015-2019 period.
Signals
About 30 percent of the line signal system (excluding interlockings) was installed before 1965 and has never been
rehabilitated. As a result, signal failures are a leading cause of subway service delays. The proposed program will
modernize six interlockings with current solid state technology. These projects will not only improve the reliability
and safety of subway service but will also prepare the lines for the roll-out of communications-based train control
(CBTC). Compared to traditional fixed block signals, CBTC offers a variety of benefits including the ability to run
more trains per hour, improve safety, reduce maintenance costs, and provide timely information to passengers.
CBTC is now complete on the Canarsie line and is in construction on the Flushing line. The proposed 2015-2019
Capital Program will continue to expand CBTC throughout the NYC Transit system, implementing the technology on
73.2 track miles on the Queens Blvd., 8th Avenue, and Culver lines. This will more than the double the 52 track miles
of CBTC investments made so far on the Canarsie and Flushing lines.
CBTC can increase capacity on crowded train lines due to higher throughput but complementary improvements in
traction power may be needed to realize this increase. Accordingly, the proposed 2015-2019 Capital Program
includes funding for five new substations (three on the Canarsie line and two on the 8th Avenue line) and
enhancements to other power infrastructure, including supplemental negative cables. These power capacity
investments total $337 million, which is in addition to the $2.152 billion signal program.
of these assets remains a core mission in the proposed 2015-2019 Capital Program. Prior capital programs had
brought all NYC Transit subway cars, buses, and track to a state of good repair and the resultant improvements in
service reliability are one of the great success stories of the capital program. Capital investments in cars, in concert
with the Scheduled Maintenance System (SMS), have increased reliability from approximately 7,000 miles between
breakdowns in 1982 to over 140,000 miles today. Likewise, bus fleet reliability has improved from below 1,000
miles between breakdowns to over 4,400 miles today. Derailments, which were once common, now occur only
rarely.
To maintain these gains in reliability, sustained investment is required. The proposed 2015-2019 Capital Program
includes over $5.8 billion for subway cars, buses, and track replacement. This represents approximately 37 percent
of the overall capital program, which is comparable to levels in past programs. The proposed 2015-2019 Capital
Program includes the purchase of 940 R-211 railcars, 10 open-gangway prototype cars and 1,391 buses (1,041
standard, 300 articulated, and 50 express buses) to replace existing fleets that are approaching the end of their
useful lives. NYC Transit will replace 127 mainline switches, 51 miles of mainline track and install 21 miles of
continuous welded rail (CWR) to prevent broken rails, reduce damage to rolling stock, and improve ride quality. In
yards, an additional 1.2 miles of track and 20 switches will be replaced.
Passenger Stations
Improving the station environment is a significant investment priority in the proposed 2015-2019 Capital Program,
totaling $2.781 billion and 18 percent of the total program. NYC Transit will continue to follow the successful
component-based repair strategy which was introduced in the 2010-2014 Capital Program to focus on eliminating
the most deficient conditions system-wide in lieu of more comprehensive projects at a limited number of locations.
This strategy is based on the results of a comprehensive condition survey of all stations in which each station
component is rated on a scale of 1.0 (best) to 5.0 (worst). The survey is updated every five years and covers
components such as stairs, platforms, mezzanines, windscreens, and canopies. The impact of the approach is a
steep reduction in the number and severity of deficiencies system-wide. By the end of the 2010-2014 period the
number of components rated 3.5 or worse will have decreased by 37 percent, as measured by the last two surveys.
Complementing the component program, the proposed 2015-2019 Capital Program includes renewal projects to
address 20 stations with high concentrations of deficient components.
NYC Transit is committed to making the subway system increasingly accessible to customers with disabilities. The
proposed 2015-2019 Capital Program provides ADA accessibility improvements at the final 11 out of a total of 100
Key Stations. Additional non-Key Stations will be made fully accessible as well.
Times Square and Grand Central subway stations are the two busiest stations in the system and patronage is
expected to increase. Accordingly, it is essential that the MTA secure adequate investment to make capacity
improvements so these stations are prepared to handle future growth needs of the City and region. The proposed
2015-2019 Capital Program includes substantial access and circulation improvements at Grand Central station
associated with the proposed development of the MTA Madison Avenue property. Similarly, at Times Square, work is
planned to renew and reconfigure the Shuttle station to improve passenger circulation and provide ADA accessibility.
The proposed 2015-2019 Capital Program also includes opening a second set of entrances at the 1 st Avenue station
and new stairs at the Bedford Avenue station on the Canarsie line (coordinated with ADA projects), the reopening of
a second entrance at the 8th Avenue station on the Sea Beach line, and other improvements to regional mobility.
The proposed 2015-2019 Capital Program also supports the completion of the new fare payment system (NFPS)
and miscellaneous station investments such as escalator and elevator replacements and signage.
56
Component Repairs
Based on the success of the component repair program in stations, NYC Transit will introduce a component-based
strategy in other asset categories, including line structures, shops, and depots. The line structure repair program will
focus on specific, known high-priority defects tracked through the continual inspection of all structures. Previously,
defects were repaired by extensive line rehabilitations, but like stations, this strategy limited the number of loca tions
that could be addressed. By focusing investment via a component approach, the 2015-2019 Capital Program will
correct defects on 12 underground tunnels and six elevated structures throughout the system, greatly extending the
reach of structure repair. As an alternative to demolition and reconstruction, a component -based approach will also
be applied at shops and depots. The proposed program includes repairs at nine shops, six depots and one base
shop, to address components such as HVAC systems, roofs, and structural elements. In addition, two depotsEast
New York and Grand Avenuewill be modified to accommodate articulated buses. Many component projects will be
implemented as part of the MTA-wide Small Business Development Program.
System Condition
Figure 2 illustrates the mix of investments by needs category in the proposed 2015-2019 Capital Program. The
program continues NYC Transits emphasis on achieving good repair and maintaining that condition through normal
replacement. Over 80 percent of the programs investments are dedicated to these activities.
Figure 2
New York City Transit Proposed 2015 -2019 Capital Program by Needs
System
Im provement
14%
State of Good
Repair
37%
Other
3%
N ormal
Replacement
46%
57
The System Investment Status (Figure 3), as developed for the 2015-2034 Twenty-Year Capital Needs Assessment
in 2013, presents by investment category whether an asset is considered in good repair or has backlogged
components in need of repair. NYC Transit has evaluated the assets that make up its vast infrastructure based on
one or more of three asset attributes as appropriate for a particular asset category:
Asset condition
Asset age vs. useful life
Asset performance vs. an identifiable performance standard it must meet
NYCT has used this dynamic approach since the 2010-2029 Twenty-Year Capital Needs Assessment, which differed
from the previous, static methodology that considered an asset in good repair if it received investment in any past
capital program, even as subcomponents aged and did not receive timely reinvestment.
Figure 3
New York City Transit System Investment Status
Cars
100%
Mainline Track/Switch
100%
Buses
91%
Pumps/Deep Wells
89%
Elevators/Escalators
82%
Bus Shops/Depots*
81%
Stations*
78%
Mainline Signals*
74%
Communications*
72%
Tunnel Lighting
70%
Power*
62%
High-Priority Ventilation
60%
Subway Shops
46%
Good Repair
Backlogged
58
59
60
62
63
64
Component Work
Beginning with the 2015-2019 Capital Program, NYC Transit will introduce a component repair program, similar to
the process developed for stations, to address defects for both elevated and subway line structures. In the subway,
areas on the right-of-way with concentrations of high-priority defects are targeted for investment. This component
approach will allow NYC Transit to address the most critical defects faster and more efficiently than under the
previous strategy, which was based on larger line segment rehabilitations. On elevated structures, component
repairs will be closely coordinated with planned painting projects to take advantage of project execution efficiencies
and prolong the useful life of the structure. In selected cases, more comprehensive projects may be required to
address structures with unique physical characteristics.
Structural Painting
Steel elevated structures require regular painting to protect against corrosion, extend the life of the structure, and
improve neighborhood aesthetics. Overcoat projects entail scraping loose paint and applying paint on top of the
existing paint layers. The debris from old coatings is collected and disposed of properly.
65
Signals
Signals ensure the safe and efficient movement of trains. There are 245 track miles of signals on the A Division and
485 miles on the B Division. Currently, 74 percent of the signal system is within its 50-year useful life, and the
balance is in need of modernization. The signal system is made up of two major elements: interlockings, or a set of
switches that are coordinated and controlled from a remote location, and the automatic signals between the
interlockings. Most of the NYC Transit system relies on conventional fixed block signal systems, but the agency is
beginning to transition to communications-based train control (CBTC) signals a technology that allows the agency
to run more trains per hour, improve safety, provide timely information to passengers, and reduce maintenance
costs. Installation of CBTC entails the modernization of each interlocking along a line, a subsequent overlay of
CBTC wayside equipment, and the outfitting of railcars with CBTC equipment.
In addition to signals, the other primary NYC Transit signal assets include ATS and the RCC. With continued
investment, NYC Transits signals have become increasingly automated. Train control has moved from local towers
to master towers and now to the RCC, a state-of-the-art facility. The ATS overlay technology provides the critical
information on train movements to enable centralized control and provides real-time train arrival information to
customers.
Communications
To meet the communication needs of a transit system serving an average of 7.7 million passengers each weekday,
NYC Transit has an extensive carrier-grade communications network. The network is supported by 472 miles of fiber
optic cable, extensive copper telephone cable installations, eight major PBX sites, wireless radio systems for use in
the subways by NYC Transit and the New York City Police and Fire Departments, 190 miles of subway antenna cable,
and one or more communications rooms located in every station. Collectively, these assets are critical to providing
service, responding to emergencies, enabling state-of-the-art customer communications, as well as administrative
operations. Communication assets also include in-station applications such as public address / customer
information signs (PA/CIS), closed-circuit television (CCTV) systems, and Help Points (customer intercom devices).
NYC Transits main fiber optic network, known as SONET/ATM, is scheduled to receive upgrades of selected
equipment in the 2015-2019 program to extend the life of the network. Various infrastructure investments will also
be required to support the continued functionality of NYC Transits communication systems, including the
replacement of communication cables (i.e., fiber optic, antenna, and copper cables), telephone infra structure, and
radio equipment.
66
Ongoing communications projects are poised to dramatically enhance the NYC Transit customer experience. One
major initiative is the roll-out of Help Points throughout the system. Help Points are highly visible intercom kiosks
that enable customers to speak directly with a NYCT customer service agent for customer information and
emergency assistance. Another key initiative is the Integrated Service and Information Management B Division
(ISIM-B) project, which will enable real-time train arrival information to be provided to NYC Transit customers and
personnel throughout the system.
67
68
Supervisory system improvements, including upgrades to the SCADA system and the replacement of control
and battery cables at various substation control zones.
NYC Transit also proposes $337 million in power system improvements to support high throughput on CBTC lines,
including:
Five new substations, including three on the Canarsie line and two on the 8th Avenue line.
Supplemental negative cables and low-resistance contact rail.
These proposals reflect anticipated programmatic savings of an average of 10 percent among select substation
projects and an average of 15 percent among select circuit breaker house projects (see Table 6). Savings are
expected through enhanced coordination of collocated projects, alternative procurement strategies including designbuild, and further use of the component repair approach.
69
70
71
72
73
74
2015-2019
Category
Assets
Rolling Stock
1,006
Electric Cars
45
Locomotives
134
Bi-Level Coaches
Passenger Stations
124
Stations
Track
515
537
Mainline Switches
162
Overhead Bridges
478
Undergrade Bridges
440
Power
108
Substations
328
Line Structures
76
25
77
Table 8
Long Island Rail Road Proposed 2015 -2019 Capital Program by Category ($ in millions)
Proposed
2015-2019
Percent
$500
18%
Stations
296
10%
Track
860
30%
Line Structures
164
6%
390
14%
211
7%
Power
250
9%
Miscellaneous
165
6%
$2,835
100%
Category
Rolling Stock
Total
Numbers may not total due to rounding
78
Program Evolution
This plan for Long Island Rail Road totals $2.835 billion, which is a reduction of $285 million compared to the
previous LIRR 20152019 capital plan proposal that was submitted in September 2014. This $285 million
reduction is the net effect of several factors:
Program Efficiencies
The revised plan assumes savings to be realized by pursuing more efficient design and construction opportunities in
project delivery. These savings are expected to be generated via the following efficiencies:
Undertaking intensive coordination of track outages to facilitate multiple projects on the same branch /
branch segment and maximizing the use of piggy backing for the same track outage. This works to
minimize service disruptions and associated substitute busing costs, while also reducing agency support
costs.
Implement mid-day station closures (where feasible) to increase efficiency of station, track and signal
construction
Table 9 below presents the elements in which these savings are assumed. Projects in these elements that are
expected to realize savings via efficiencies are starred (**) in the blue pages listing of projects. The budgets of
those projects which have been starred have been reduced to reflect the agencys best estimate at the t ime of this
plan resubmission. LIRR will work to meet these reductions by incorporating efficiency strategies as the project
progresses.
Table 9
Long Island Rail Road Capital Program Savings Due to Program Efficiencies ($ in millions)
Category
L702
Type of Project
Stations
L705
Communications
and Signals
Total
% Red.
12%
8%
Assumed
Savings Likely Efficiencies
$35 Undertake intensive coordination of track outages amongst
multiple capital projects to maximize piggy backing
opportunities, along with mid-day station closures for
construction (where feasible); Leverage contributions from
municipalities and private development towards
construction of new LIRR stations.
32 Undertake intensive coordination of track outages amongst
multiple capital projects to maximize piggy backing
opportunities, along with mid-day station closures for
construction (where feasible).
$67
79
Revised Estimates
In the year that has elapsed since the September 2014 plan submission, projects have advanced further in the
scope development and design process, resulting in better cost estimate information upon which to establish project
budgets. This is particularly true for projects in the Bridges element.
Priority Changes
LIRR has been undertaking a review of all projects in the plan, to reflect new information since the September 2014
submission for the 2015 2019 time period. This includes a review of ongoing normal replacement / state of good
repair programs as well as large investment efforts which span multiple capital programs to identify efforts which
could be better progressed following the 2015 2019 Program without impact on operations or maintenance and
inspection programs. In addition, needs addressed in this plan reflect the most up-to-date field condition data. This
is particularly true for projects in the Track Asset Category. Finally, the LIRR has re-examined the anticipated power
substation investments, adjusting the balance of work between substations identified for full replacement and those
substations which would be part of the substation component program
80
Major Investments
Primary elements of this proposed program include investments to maintain core infrastructure and smart
investments that will enhance mobility, customer satisfaction, safety, and security.
Core Infrastructure
The Long Island Rail Road continues the progress made since the inception of the first Capital Program in 1982,
with significant infrastructure investments in the proposed 2015-2019 Capital Program. Investments to maintain
the core infrastructure account for 67 percent of the proposed 2015-2019 Capital Program, across all asset
categories. This intensive level of investment assures that system components are replaced at the end of their
useful life, avoiding the service disruptions and added maintenance expenses that occur when components
unexpectedly fail. All LIRR asset categories, with the exception of Bridges and Viaducts, are currently under a normal
replacement cycle. Maintaining this classification is the goal of projects identified in the Stations, Track,
Communications and Signals, Shops and Yards, and Power investment categories. Key projects include:
Replacing platforms and associated station components at three stations: Babylon, Nostrand Avenue and
Hunterspoint Avenue.
Upgrading the LIRR signal network by installing bi-directional Automatic Speed Control (ASC) using cab
signaling in segments where it does not currently exist, including Dark Territory, and a more robust signal
normal replacement program, which targets aging and deteriorated signal system components.
Continuing multiple infrastructure improvement programs such as the Annual Track Program and the
continued upgrade and build out of the Fiber Optic Network.
Undertaking an expanded program of bridge painting and bridge waterproofing to address and prevent rust,
corrosion and water infiltration.
Implementing a substation component replacement program to address the most poorly rated components
within aging substations thereby protecting operational reliability.
Regional Mobility
Close to 75 percent of Nassau and Suffolk County residents who commute to Manhattan for work use the LIRR, and
that reliance on public transportation leads to cleaner air, improved mobility, and an all-around better quality of life
for residents of this populous region. To remain the vital force in transportation that Long Islanders rely on and to
continue contributing to the regions future growth and well-being, LIRR must prepare for the future. At present,
capacity issues at key locations impact LIRRs ability to respond to market demand. Penn Station, LIRRs Manhattan
terminal, is currently at capacity during many periods of the day. The stations 21 tracks shared by the LIRR,
Amtrak and New Jersey Transit carry over 1,000 trains each day, and service growth is simply impossible. The East
Side Access project, which will provide the LIRR with a second Manhattan terminal (Grand Central Terminal), will
allow direct Long Island Rail Road service to the east side of Manhattan for the first time ever. This enhanced train
service will bring Long Island residents closer to their final destination, thus reducing travel time and congestion at
Penn Station and the subway lines serving it.
Building upon this, proposed investments in this program support the growing role Long Island Rail Road plays in the
transportation of intra-Island riders and commuters working non-traditional hours, as well as leisure travelers taking
advantage of the regions wealth of cultural attractions. This program will complete a vision realized during the
1980s Main Line electrification project a full second track on the Main Line between Farmingdale and
81
Ronkonkoma. This tremendously important investment will greatly improve reliability and allow for expanded service
in this very busy suburban travel corridor.
Customer Satisfaction
The MTA Long Island Rail Road has a long history of contributing to the quality of life of area residents. From its
founding in 1834, the Long Island Rail Road has been a vital lifeline for Long Island and New York City, leading to
the growth and development of the communities it serves and providing a gateway for the economic growth of the
region. Today, as an essential component of the regions transportation infrastructure, the LIRR is looking to provide
opportunities for further ridership growth, incorporate modern technology, and improve accessibility for all riders.
The proposed 2015-2019 Capital Program includes a variety of such smart investments to enhance service
capacity, create new system capabilities and increase customer satisfaction.
21 st Century Electric Fleet
Between 2002 and 2007, the LIRR completed a major fleet replacement effort, retiring the almost 40 year old M -1
electric cars and replacing them with 836 M-7 cars. The state-of-the-art M-7 fleet has proven to be extremely
reliable, as demonstrated by the increase in the number of miles traveled prior to unscheduled maintenance . The M7 car sets the standard for a comfortable 21 st century LIRR experience, reflecting feedback received from customer
focus groups and incorporating improvements in seating, enhanced lighting, window design, public address systems
and restrooms. Auxiliary power units and climate control units were also doubled for greater reliability and comfort
and the cars meet all requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act. Building on these successes, the
proposed 2015 2019 Program will continue the purchase of new M-9 electric cars, an effort which began in the
2010 2014 Capital Program. This continued fleet modernization effort will complete the replacement of the aging
M-3 electric fleet, which faces a number of service reliability challenges and dated system technology. New car
purchases are also needed to support future operational needs associated with Grand Central service.
Station and Parking Improvements
The last 20 years have seen numerous investments in LIRR stations throughout the system, including installation of
elevators and other improvements to make stations wheelchair accessible; renewal of public restrooms, waiting
areas, and ticket offices; station plaza areas; platforms; and targeted parking rehabilitation and expansion to
maximize availability for LIRR customers.
Among these investments, two of the LIRRs busiest stations, Jamaica and Atlantic Terminal, underwent tremendous
transformation. As the LIRRs hub station, Jamaica has long served as the connecting point between 10 LIRR
branches and the three Western Terminals (Penn Station, Atlantic Terminal and Hunterspoint Avenue). Since the
Port Authority of New York and New Jerseys JFK AirTrain service began in December 2003, Jamaica Station has also
become a busy transfer point for travelers to and from JFK International Airport. In 2013, rehabilitation work was
completed on the historic Jamaica Station Building, which houses the stations ticket office and customer waiting
room, as well as LIRR corporate offices and facilities for key operations. Restoration work on this century-old
structure included roof replacement, repairs to terra cotta and faade ornamentation, extensive painting,
replacement of exterior doors and windows, new exterior building lighting, amongst other work elements. With these
recently completed capital investments, Jamaica Station ushers in the 21 st century, with its vaulted glass and steel
structure and adjacent iconic station building serving as a landmark within the community and providing a modern
facility for current and future LIRR customers.
Since 2012, all 121 LIRR branch line stations have Audio Visual Paging System (AVPS), which uses electronic signs
on station platforms and in station buildings to provide customers with real time train information. This includes
82
audio and visual message delivery with station stopping patterns for upcoming trains, critical safety reminders, and
information about upcoming service changes.
Capital improvements are underway which will transform numerous LIRR stations, including platform replacement
and associated improvements at Massapequa, Wantagh and Hicksville stations, installation of new elevators and
station upgrades at Queens Village, Flushing Main Street, and Mets-Willets Point stations. These projects are
transforming the customer environment at key locations, enhancing customer safety, and greatly improving station
access by providing ADA amenities.
This proposed program also features $25 million for the development and expansion of commuter parking. This will
build upon previous parking investments made through the Capital Program, including the Mineola Intermodal
Center and the Wyandanch Parking Facility, which opened for service in August 2015. The current parking needs for
LIRR customers will grow in the future, particularly once East Side Access service opens. Site selection for the new
parking facility will target the busiest LIRR electric branches, prioritizing stations also served by multiple bus routes
to provide multi-modal transit opportunities. Where possible, consideration will also be given to Transit Oriented
Development to partner with the community so that MTA investments can be coordinated with land use policies that
encourage compact development and convenient access to the system for its customers.
System Condition
Investments in its capital assets since 1982 have allowed the Long Island Rail Road to improve its operations, thus
providing an invaluable service to the region by ensuring the legacy of the railroad. The MTAs proposed 2015-2019
Capital Program continues this legacy and looks to the future with system improvement projects that will expand
capacity, increase levels of service, and support new LIRR service to Grand Central Terminal.
83
The proposed 2015 2019 Capital Program allocates 67 percent of its funding to state of good repair and normal
replacement projects, and 28 percent to smart investments that will improve the system (System Improvements).
Included in this system improvement funding are new stations, expansion and upgrades to track capacity, and new
investments in signals and communications (Figure 4).
Figure 4
Long Island Rail Road Proposed 2015-2019 Capital Program by Needs
Other
5%
System
Im provement
28%
State of Good
Repair
6%
N ormal
Replacement
61%
As described in the recently published 2015-2034 Twenty-Year Capital Needs Assessment, the MTA is recognizing
the fiscal realities of maintaining its assets by revamping the strategies by which assets are repaired and
modernized, placing much greater emphasis on lower-cost component replacement rather than complete
reconstruction of facilities. This shift is an outgrowth of the component investment strategy that was successfully
introduced for New York City Transit passenger stations in the 2010-2014 Capital Program, and is now being
applied in certain areas of the LIRR programs for stations, line structures, signals, and power.
Line Structures is the only asset category LIRR has identified as not in a state of good repair. In recent years, the
LIRR has made significant progress on this category with the completion of structural renewal on the Atlantic Avenue
Viaduct. Regular bridge inspections and maintenance also ensure the safety and operation of these assets. In
addition, other assets have components with replacement needs that will be reflected in future asset inventory
updates.
84
85
86
87
88
89
Station to increase station throughput in conjunction with service expansion. Current constraints in track and station
capacity limit the number of trains which Jamaica station can accommodate during peak periods. By implementing
new configurations for the interlockings both east and west of Jamaica station, this complex will be modernized,
through a new track layout, new signals, and new higher speed crossover switches. As East Side Access service
begins, the public will benefit directly from these investments because trains will be able to enter and leave the
station more quickly.
Building upon the Phase I work undertaken in the 2010 2014 Capital Program, the LIRR applied implementation
efficiencies to the schedule for this latest phase, reducing the 2015 2019 investment by $145 million while
continuing to modernize the track level infrastructure both east and west of Jamaica Station, installing higher speed
switches and creating more streamlined track routings though the Jamaica complex. In doing so, this effort will also
address selected state of good repair needs, by replacing and upgrading track, signal and switch components, many
of which have exceeded their useful lives and are in need of modernization.
Amtrak Territory Investments - $68 million
This project provides funding for LIRRs Baseline Capital Contribution to the North East Corridor pursuant to the
Passenger Rail Investment and Improvement Act (PRIIA) and other major investments in the Penn Station and East
River Tunnel joint use territory. This includes the continuation of the total track replacement work in the East River
Tunnels that began in the 2010-2014 Capital Program.
Main Line Double Track Phase 2 - $250 million
The LIRRs Main Line from Farmingdale to Ronkonkoma is largely single track, with double tracking only at stations
and selected passing sidings. This results in a very fragile operation, where it is very challenging to recover from
adverse operational conditions and service disruptions. Infrastructure challenges also create timetable limitations,
particularly for off-peak trains. To address these challenges and to enhance service reliability and train service
opportunities along this very critical corridor, the LIRR is currently constructing a full second track. The first phase,
covering Ronkonkoma to Central Islip, is under construction and funded in the 2010 2014 Capital Program. Phase
2 in the proposed 2015 2019 Capital Program will complete the double track, by constructing the Central Islip to
Farmingdale segment.
A full second track between Farmingdale and Ronkonkoma will greatly enhance customer satisfaction and
operational performance on this segment of the LIRR. When Phase 2 is completed, the LIRR will be able to provide
bi-directional, half-hourly off-peak service in this corridor, greatly enhancing service opportunities for customers.
90
91
92
93
This proposed program includes two projects totaling $6 million to: continue the replacement of deteriorated radiax
cable in the East River Tunnels along with aging and deteriorated equipment in the Penn Station Radio room; a
public address system project to replace and upgrade station hardware and system components of the Audio Visual
Paging System this includes replacement of the control computer equipment at stations as well as installation of
upgraded electronic display signs at select locations.
This program also includes select security investments to safeguard LIRR customers, employees, and infrastructure.
Signals - $331 million
The Long Island Rail Roads proposed 2015-2019 Capital Program includes funds to advance LIRRs long-term
signal strategy. As part of its ongoing efforts to maintain signal assets, the LIRR has included a $50 million Signal
normal replacement project to renew and upgrade existing signal component equipment at locations throughout the
LIRR system.
Also, targeting one of the most critical needs for signal investment, the $52 million Babylon Interlocking Renewal
project will replace and upgrade aging signal equipment in the vicinity of Babylon Station, including switches,
signals, cables and other signal system components.
In order to increase safety and comply with federal mandates, a $126 million project is included to complete
Positive Train Control (PTC) investments, which will include wayside and on-board train control elements. This builds
upon PTC investments undertaken in previous capital programs.
The proposed Ronkonkoma to Yaphank Signalization project addresses some of the remaining areas of dark
territory within the LIRR system. Currently, the area east of Ronkonkoma is not signalized. This $29 million project
will upgrade the Ronkonkoma to Yaphank segment, including installing track circuits and automatic speed control
(ASC).
The proposed $44 million Babylon to Patchogue project will upgrade and modernize the signal system within this
segment of the Montauk Branch. In conjunction with other capital projects which are underway, this will provide for a
modernized, speed control signal system between Babylon and Montauk.
This proposed program also continues efforts towards Centralized Train Control, with a total of $ 20 million to
advance tower migration into the central control facility in Jamaica, thereby creating a greater concentration of the
LIRRs train dispatching and supervision functions within a single location.
Finally, a design effort for a new Hunt to Post signal system will advance the replacement and modernization of
signal technology along a portion of the Port Jefferson Branch, between Huntington and Smithtown. Finally,
investments in system-wide Lightning Protection will focus on key interlocking locations, providing an upgrade to the
latest surge protection standards. These two projects total $10 million.
This proposal reflects anticipated programmatic savings of an average of 8 percent among selected signal projects
in this category (see Table 9). Savings are expected as a result of intensive coordination of track outages amongst
multiple capital projects to maximize piggy backing opportunities, along with mid-day station closures for
construction (where feasible).
94
95
million Fire Protection Improvements project will replace and upgrade fire alarm and fire suppression systems at
selected employee facility locations. The proposed program also includes an $8 million capital project for restoration
and improvement of select employee facilities to address various building systems within selected shops, yard
facilities, towers and administrative offices.
Finally, shops and yards investment efforts in support of the above projects, to be undertaken as part of the MTAs
Small Business Development Program (SBDP), total $23 million. This includes replacement / renewal of building
components within LIRRs employee facilities.
96
The proposal also calls for $39 million in traction power investments for the replacement and/or upgrade of
sections of third rail protection board and replacement of conventional third rail with composite rail, as well as
upgrades to third rail cable feeders, third rail disconnect switches, 2000 MCM cable, and negative reactors. Other
projects within the power asset category, totaling $33 million, include replacement of substation batteries, DC relay
controls, volt feeders, signal power motor generators, tunnel lighting, and signal and power pole line replacement .
98
99
100
2015-2019
Category
Rolling Stock
Passenger Stations
Track
Structures
Assets
881
Electric Cars
278
Push-pull Coaches
67
Locomotives
14
Buses
86
Stations
552
573
Mainline Switches
325
Overhead Bridges
434
Undergrade Bridges
481
59
254
102
11
Substations
Track Miles of Third Rail Power
Shops and Yards
103
Table 11
Metro-North Railroad Proposed 2015 -2019 Capital Program by Category ($ in millions)
Proposed
2015-2019
Percent
$532
23%
392
17%
458
20%
194
8%
Power
101
4%
472
20%
Miscellaneous
173
7%
$2,321
100%
Category
Rolling Stock
Total
Numbers may not total due to rounding
104
Program Evolution
This plan for Metro-North Railroad totals $2.321 billion, which is a reduction of $232 million compared to the
previous Metro-North 2015 2019 capital plan proposal that was submitted in September 2014. This $232 million
reduction is the net effect of several factors:
Program Efficiencies
The revised plan assumes savings based upon more efficient design and construction, and modifications in project
delivery. These savings are expected to be generated via the following efficiencies:
Coordination of resources, work windows and work hour efficiencies to minimize service impacts and reduce
agency support costs.
Prioritize critical needs and utilize component repairs, rather than complete replacement, of certain assets
where possible.
Explore opportunities to leverage funding partnerships with municipalities and private development.
Refine scoping and implementation practices.
Table 12 below presents the elements in which these savings are assumed. Projects in these elements are expected
to realize savings via efficiencies are starred (**) in the blue pages listing of projects. Budgets of those projects
which have been starred have been reduced, based upon the agencys best estimate at the time of this plan resubmission. Metro-North will work to meet these reductions by incorporating efficiency strategies as the projects
progress.
105
Table 12
Metro-North Railroad Capital Program Savings Due to Program Efficiencies ($ in millions)
%
Red.
4%
Assumed
Savings Likely Efficiencies
$15 Rigorous site selection process with careful consideration of
opportunities to leverage funding partnerships with
municipalities and private development
9%
Category
M702
Type of Project
Stations &
Parking
M703
Track &
Structures
M704
Communications 15%
and Signals
M705
Power
Total
16%
$100
Revised Estimates
In the year that has elapsed since the September 2014 plan submission, projects have advanced further in the
scope development and design process, resulting in better project cost and schedule information upon which to
establish overall project budgets. This is particularly true for some Grand Central Terminal, Communications and
Signals, and Power projects.
Priority Changes
Metro-North has been undertaking a review of all projects in the plan, to incorporate new information since the
September 2014 submission and evaluate investment priorities for the 2015 2019 time period. This includes a
review of ongoing normal replacement/state of good repair programs as well as large investment efforts which span
multiple capital programs to identify efforts which could be progressed following the 2015 2019 Program without
posing undue burdens upon Metro-North operations or the railroads maintenance and inspection program. In
addition, some recently identified replacement needs have been incorporated in the plan submission, thus reflecting
the most up-to-date field condition data. Metro-North has re-examined the anticipated power and signal substation
investments and has adjusted the balance of work between various substation needs as well as the multiple signal
projects identified for capital funding. The priority needs on the stations were re-examined to update the balance of
rehabilitation and component work. Finally, funding was added to progress work towards a new midpoint yard and
passing sidings on the Port Jervis Line to support Metro-Norths West of Hudson service and ridership.
106
Major Investments
Primary elements of this investment program include investments that will enhance safety, security, reliability and
customer service as described below (more detailed summaries of the projects are discussed in later sections).
Achieving a state of good repair and protecting past investments in rolling stock and infrastructure to promote and
ensure safety and reliability remains one of the most critical elements of the proposed 2015-2019 Capital Program.
Metro-North must progress critical rolling stock and state of good repair infrastructure work while ensuring that all
the improvements resulting from the last 33 years of Capital Program work are maintained for future generations
through the normal replacement of assets at the end of their useful life. Key projects include:
Rolling Stock Investments
Continue implementation of the Metro-North Rolling Stock strategy with the replacement of the M-3 fleet at the end
of its useful life.
Safety Critical and State of Good Repair Projects
Significant investment in the Grand Central Terminal Trainshed, to improve the condition and progress the
$1 billion state of good repair backlog.
Advance and enhance the Cyclical Track Program to continue to maintain this infrastructure in a state of
good repair and to begin significant rail replacement system-wide.
Expand the Undergrade Bridge Program east and west of the Hudson River as well as the east of Hudson
Overhead Bridge Program to progress these bridges toward a state of good repair.
Continue the investment in bringing the Port Jervis Line infrastructure to a state of good repair with track,
viaduct and bridge work.
Continue extensive traction power rehabilitation and improvements essential to maintaining reliable and
dependable service and supporting service growth.
Begin replacement of the aged Hudson Line signal system from Croton-Harmon to Poughkeepsie with a high
capacity signal system.
Complete the federally mandated Positive Train Control project to enhance rail safety system-wide. Initial
investment in this critical technology was committed in the 2010-2014 Capital Program.
Complete replacement of the Electric Shop at the Croton-Harmon Shop, finishing the majority of work at
Harmon, the cornerstone of Metro-Norths long-term shops and yards strategy to upgrade and adequately
size shops and yards for storage, maintenance and inspection services.
Customer Experience Improvements
Continue investments in station renewal with rehabilitation and critical priority component repair projects to station
facilities throughout the system to maintain these elements in good repair. Continue program to improve customer
communications in Grand Central Terminal and at outlying stations East of the Hudson River by deploying the latest
customer information technology to provide real-time performance information including departure time and
destination, status, and track to customers and employees.
107
System Condition
Since 1982, when the first Capital Program began, Metro-North has committed a total of $6 billion to replace rail car
equipment and restore a majority of its infrastructure to a state of good repair, establishing a normal replacement
cycle for many of its assets and making select system improvements. Obsolete track was replaced by 1986 (with the
exception of the more recently acquired Port Jervis Line). The work to bring the Communications and Signals assets
to a state of good repair was completed by 2000 and the Power assets reached a state of good repair by the end of
the 2000-2004 Capital Program. These assets are in a cycle of normal replacement and need continued significant
investment in order to maintain a state of good repair and support safe, comfortable and reliable service for MetroNorth customers.
In the proposed 20152019 Capital Program, 84 percent of the Metro-North investments are dedicated to state of
good repair and normal replacement projects with 10 percent to investments to improve the system (System
Improvements). Much of the system improvement funding is devoted to completing the Positive Train Control
project, improved communications, and parking expansion and strategic intermodal facilities needed for our
customers to access the railroad. (See Figure 5)
Figure 5
Metro-North Railroad Proposed 2015-2019 Capital Program by Needs
5%
System
Im provement
10%
State of Good
Repair
33%
Other
6%
N ormal
Replacement
51%
Metro-North has four asset categories identified as not in a state of good repair:
Grand Central Terminal and Stations which includes the extensive Grand Central Terminal Trainshed; this
structure requires a significant increase in level of investment over the next 20 years to progress toward a
state of good repair.
Structures, which based on a more comprehensive inspection program, require a significant increase in
investments to progress work toward a state of good repair over the next 20 years.
Port Jervis Line Infrastructure, for which Metro-North assumed responsibility under a lease agreement with
Norfolk Southern in 2003, continues to require substantial additional investment to repair its 66 miles of
track and bridges. These needs will continue to be addressed in future programs.
Shops and Yards, for which state of good repair will largely be addressed by completion of the replacement
of the Harmon Shop Electric Shop in the 2015-2019 Capital Program.
108
Metro-North Railroad
Rolling Stock
Category M-701
The goal for the proposed 2015-2019 Capital Programs $532 million investment in rolling stock is to maintain the
fleet by replacing cars that have reached the end of their useful life and to accommodate projected growth in
electrified territory served by the Harlem Line and Hudson Line service. Upon completion of the delivery of
purchases made under the 2010-2014 Capital Program, the revenue fleet available for service will total 1,240
units. This includes 213 push-pull coaches, 881 electric cars, 52 locomotives, and 14 buses for East of Hudson
service; and 15 locomotives and 65 coaches available for service on the Port Jervis and Pascack Valley Lines,
operated by New Jersey Transit per an agreement among the parties. Through the 2015-2019 investments, MetroNorth will continue fleet replacement efforts to enhance the quality of service for railroad customers.
109
Metro-North Railroad
Stations
Category M-702
There are 86 Metro-North passenger stations in New York State, 74 east of the Hudson River and 12 more west of
the Hudson. The long-term objective of Grand Central Terminal, outlying station and parking investments is to
achieve a state of good repair, improve operations, increase customer satisfaction, and conserve the historic
stations along the system. In addition, Metro-North will make progress toward constructing new facilities to
accommodate increased ridership and increase access and parking opportunities. These initiatives support local
development opportunities as well.
110
Stations Projects
Upper Hudson and Harlem Line Stations Priority Repairs - $40 million
Priority component repairs at stations along the Upper Hudson and Upper Harlem Line will improve the condition of
the stations and provide an enhanced customer experience. In addition, potential intermodal improvements at
White Plains based on an upcoming City of White Plains led study to be undertaken in conjunction with the MTA and
other stakeholders.
Harlem Line Stations Improvements - $31 million
This project is a continuation of work begun in the 2010-2014 Capital Program. The 2015-2019 Capital Program will
rehabilitate Botanical Gardens, Williams Bridge and Woodlawn, addressing those elements of the stations that are
111
either in poor condition or that are at or beyond the end of their useful life. Station elements to be addressed
include platforms, overpasses, and canopies.
Harlem-125th Street Station Improvements - $2 million
This project will restore or replace the historic stairways located on the south side of 125 th Street under the viaduct.
Metro-North will also improve the lighting around the station building and under the viaduct to increase safety and
improve the customer environment.
Station Building Rehabilitation - $1 million
Many of Metro-Norths station buildings are historic, built in the late 1800s or early 1900s, and in varied
condition. The cost to renovate these structures can often be high because of building age and condition. The
proposed scope includes improvements at stations buildings such as Ossining and Brewster.
West of Hudson Station Improvements - $2 million
Metro-North serves eleven stations in Orange and Rockland Counties on the Pascack Valley and Port Jervis Lines.
Several of these stations are reaching the end of the normal service life and require priority component capital
investments. For the 2015-2019 Capital Program, three (3) stations have been identified for normal replacement
improvements: Spring Valley on the Pascack Valley Line and Harriman and Middletown on the Port Jervis Line.
Customer Communications - $60 million
This project, being designed in the 2010-2014 Capital Program, is part of a larger phased initiative to deploy the
latest customer information technology, providing real-time performance information including departure time and
destination, status, and track to customers and employees. It will provide the following improvements:
Replace obsolete head end Public Address (PA) and Visual Information Systems (VIS) equipment and field PA
and VIS communications equipment.
Integrate the functionalities of the existing station public address, Train Time and GCT VIS systems to create
a new Customer Communications Information System.
Provide visual information displays with real-time information including hardware, software and applications
and connections with Public Address (PA) systems for passenger stations.
Provide outlying stations Infrastructure and fiber connectivity for station devices including station cable,
conduit and communications rooms to support data requirements for all systems.
Replacement of all wayside PA systems at passenger stations.
Provide intercom/railroad telephone systems, including all necessary field/office systems for passenger
stations.
CCTV Video and Access Control Management - including central control equipment, access controllers, IP
cameras and network video recorders for passenger stations and other Metro-North facilities.
Elevator and Escalator Management- including central control equipment and controllers for all GCT and
passenger station elevators and escalators.
These Customer Service Initiatives (CSIs) are intended to provide a higher level of service to Metro-North customers
in a phased rollout east of the Hudson River, providing more accurate and usable systems to achieve the desired
level of service. CDOT will provide supplemental funding for this important project. In addition, Metro-North will work
112
with the CDOT to install these capabilities in Connecticut and with New Jersey Transit on the west of the Hudson
River territory as well.
New Fare Payment System - $5 million
The $5 million is allocated to advancing the MTA-wide new fare payment system to support the MTA-wide efforts to
allow customers to use a single smart card, or cell phone with a smart chip to ride the entire MTA network. This
project will develop the next generation ticket vending machine to replace current aging and obsolete ticket vending
machines in the next Capital Program.
Strategic Facilities - $20 million
The $20 million Strategic Facilities project will improve parking and access to Metro-North trains through parking
expansion at location(s) to be determined with possible candidates for such facilities considered based on available
land, demonstrated need and Transit Oriented Development (TOD) where possible. TOD initiatives, joint use of
parking facilities and access provided in partnership with developers can enhance Metro-Norths opportunities to
expand rail access, grow ridership, reduce capital costs, increase revenues and establish a more sustainable, mixe duse station area. To progress these projects, Metro-North will look to partner and coordinate with various third party
groups such as counties, local towns, communities and private organizations, as well as New York State agencies
such as the New York State Department of Transportation.
Mentoring Stations and Strategic Facilities - $18 million
The proposed 2015-2019 Capital Program includes an allocation of $18 million for station component and strategic
facilities investments in support of the above projects, to be undertaken as part of the MTAs Small Business
Development Program (SBDP).
This proposal reflects anticipated programmatic savings of as much as 4 percent in parking and strategic facilities
projects (see Table 12). Savings are expected as a result of a rigorous site selection(s) process with careful
consideration for potential developer/municipality partnerships.
113
Metro-North Railroad
Track and Structures
Category M-703
There are 387 route miles and 795 track miles (545 electrified) that constitute the Metro-North system in New York
State and Connecticut. Of that, 552 mainline track miles and 573 mainline switches are in New York State, including
Grand Central Terminal. The long-term objective of investments in this area is to maintain the condition of the
majority of the existing assets that are in a state of good repair and achieve a state of good repair for structures. The
ongoing renewal of the trackage is essential to providing customers with a safe, reliable, and comfortable ride. To
accomplish this, Metro-North has developed a cyclical program of track and turnout renewal and replacement that
maintains track structure components and switch facilities in proper operating condition. Similarly, the continued
integrity of line structures along the railroad right-of-way is vital to its smooth and safe operation. There are more
than 700 bridges in the New York Territory of Metro-North Railroad. This includes overhead and undergrade bridges,
viaducts, tunnels and retaining walls. A key focus for line structures in this program will be on addressing the most
critical needs for Metro-Norths 434 undergrade bridges throughout the system.
114
115
116
Metro-North Railroad
Communications and Signals
Category M-704
There are 387 route miles and 795 track miles that constitute the Metro-North system in New York State and
Connecticut. Of that amount, 579 track miles are signaled. The signal system includes 450 miles of cable
transmission systems, 100 centralized control systems, and a 328 route-mile signal network. The long-term
objective of investments in this area is to replace the aging signal system (wayside and operations control center)
with the latest technology to accommodate current operations and provide compatibility for future needs. Over the
previous capital programs, Metro-North has invested in a centralized control system and the infrastructure to
operate it. To protect the past investment and keep the system up to current standards, Metro-North has
established a cyclical program to replace and upgrade the elements of the overall signal system. In addition, MetroNorth looks to optimize train capacity to accommodate the railroads current needs, future se rvice plans and future
ridership projections. Metro-North will also make investments in Positive Train Control as required under the Rail
Safety Improvement Act of 2008.
117
based on the Amtrak Advanced Civil Speed Enforcement System (ACSES), which is an overlay to the Automatic
Control Signal (ATS) System used in the Northeast Corridor. This project supplements the funding in the 2010-2014
Capital Program and is needed to complete this federal mandate. The proposed 2015-2015 Capital Program
includes $94 million for the project. Connecticut Department of Transportation (CDOT) participation will supplement
this funding to support PTC investments in the state of Connecticut.
Other Communications and Signals projects - $8 million
The remainder of the communications and signals projects include Replace Signal Office Equipment/SCADA Office,
PBX Replacement, Upgrade Grade Crossings, Replace High Cycle Relays and Fire Suppression Systems.
This proposal reflects anticipated programmatic savings of an average of 15 percent among selected
Communications & Signal projects (see Table 12). Savings are expected as a result of coordination of resources,
work windows and work hour efficiencies to minimize service impacts and reduce agency support costs, as well as
refined implementation plans.
118
Metro-North Railroad
Power
Category M-705
There are 387 route miles and 795 track miles that constitute the Metro-North system in New York State and
Connecticut. Of that amount, 545 track miles are electrified with 256 track miles of DC 3 rd rail power and 289 track
miles of AC catenary power. The power supply for this system in New York State includes 49 DC substations, seven
AC substations and three yard distribution systems. The long-term objective of investments in this area is to
maintain the condition of the existing assets and increase traction power capacity to support current service levels
and projected service growth over the next 20 years.
119
Metro-North Railroad
Shops and Yards
Category M-706
Metro-North owns and operates 11 shops and/or yard facilities system-wide, including three shops at diesel/electric
yards (Brewster, Harmon, Highbridge), two diesel yards East of Hudson (Poughkeepsie and Wassaic), two diesel
yards West of Hudson (Port Jervis and Woodbine), one electric yard at North White Plains, Grand Central Terminal,
and two yards for non-revenue equipment at MO Tower and Mount Vernon West. The shop and yard facilities provide
for fleet storage, maintenance and inspection services. Metro-Norths long-term shops and yards strategy is to
upgrade and adequately size these facilities to accommodate additions to the rolling stock fleet (such as the M-7
electric cars), to support the Reliability Centered Maintenance program, to improve On-Time Performance, and to
ensure customers are provided with a safe, reliable and comfortable ride. In support of the long-term strategy,
Metro-North will continue to replace and upgrade its shop and yard infrastructure at Croton-Harmon yard and other
critical locations to meet the demands of the current (and planned) fleet, and support efficient operating and
maintenance practices.
120
Metro-North Railroad
Miscellaneous
Category M-708
Projects in this category provide for costs associated with the support and management of the Capital Program and
projects with program-wide applicability such as system-wide environmental remediation, protective liability
coverage, independent engineer services, value engineering services, scope development and security.
121
122
2015-2019
Category
Buses
Assets
646
72
497
Depots
124
Standard
Articulated
Express Coaches
Depots
14
Bus Washers
Paint Booths
125
Table 14
MTA Bus Company Proposed 2015 -2019 Capital Program by Category ($ in millions)
Category
Buses
Facilities and Equipment
Program Administration
Total
Numbers may not total due to rounding
126
$376
Proposed
2015-2019
Percent
$244
65%
105
28%
27
7%
100%
Program Efficiencies
The plan assumes savings of $4.2 million, to be realized via more efficient design and construction of depot
component and equipment projects. Efficiencies to be employed include:
Component repair, rather than complete replacement, of targeted equipment.
Coordination of contracting and procurement across multiple depots.
Greater use of life-extension techniques rather than full replacement.
Use of standard, off-the-shelf specifications, to the extent possible.
MTA Bus projects that are expected to realize savings via efficiencies are starred (**) in the blue pages listing of
projects. The budgets of starred projects have been reduced by 10 percent as compared to the agencies best
estimate at the time of this plan resubmission. MTA Bus will strive to meet these reduced budgets, by incorporating
efficiency strategies during project design. Some projects may yield greater savings opportunities than others, but
the total savings of $4 million is the agencys goal.
Table 15
MTA Bus Company Capital Program Projected Savings Due to Program Efficiencies ($ in millions)
Total
% Red.
10%
Assumed
Savings
$4
Likely Efficiencies
Component repair; coordination of contracting
and procurement; life extension techniques; use
of standard specifications
$4
Revised Estimates
In the year that has elapsed since the September 2014 plan submission, projects have advanced further in the
design process, resulting in better cost estimate information upon which to establish project budgets.
Priority Changes
MTA Bus has reevaluated all projects in the plan to confirm that all projects are critical to advance in the 2015-2019
timeframe. Some work was identified that can wait until after 2019 without an impact on operations and
maintenance, and has been excluded from the plan resubmission. At the same time, however, a small amount of
other work has been added to the plan resubmission to address newly emerging needs that had not been identified
prior to September 2014.
127
Major Investments
Bus fleets and depots are the core of MTA Bus investment needs. Highlights of the program follow.
Bus Fleet
The proposed 2015-2019 Capital Program includes $244 million to purchase a total of 345 new buses, including:
292 high capacity express buses and 53 articulated buses. All of the buses procured during the 2015-2019 period
will be for normal placement of buses that are approaching the end of their useful lives.
Program Administration
$27 million is set aside for in-house and third-party support of the projects proposed in the 2015-2019 Capital
Program.
System Condition
Figure 6 illustrates the mix of investments by needs category in the proposed 2015-2019 Capital Program. The
program continues the MTA Bus emphasis on achieving and maintaining a state of good repair by devoting 88
percent of funding to replacing fleet and restoring facilities.
Figure 6
MTA Bus Company Proposed 2015 -2019 Capital Program by Needs
System
Im provement
6%
Other
7%
State of Good
Repair
5%
N ormal
Replacement
81%
128
MTA Bus assets are evaluated with the same benchmarks used for NYC Transit assets namely asset condition,
asset age vs. useful life, and asset performance vs. an identifiable performance standard. The System Investment
Status (Figure 7) presents the percent of assets in good repair and those with backlogged components in need of
repair.
Figure 7
MTA Bus Company System Investment Status
Buses
Bus Shops & Depots*
100%
61%
Good Repair
Backlogged
129
130
2015-2019
132
Table 16
MTA Interagency Proposed 2015 -2019 Capital Program by Category ($ in millions)
Proposed
2015-2019
$39
225
Category
Total
$264
133
MTA Interagency
MTA Police Department
Category N-710
The MTA Police Department is responsible for ensuring the safety and security of MTAs customers, employees, and
facilities throughout the MTA service area. The service area encompasses over 4,400 square miles covering 14
counties in New York and Connecticut. On January 1, 1998, the MTA consolidated the police forces of the LIRR and
Metro-North Railroad under the jurisdiction of the MTA Police. Subsequently, the Staten Island Rapid Transit Police
was added to MTA Police on June 1, 2005. Prior to the consolidation, capital improvements associated with police
needs at these Operating Agencies were addressed as part of the respective agency capital programs. Building upon
the work begun with the 2005-2009 Capital Program and continued in the 2010-2014 Capital Program, the MTA
Police Departments 2015 -2019 Capital Program will continue to assist the MTA Police Department to accomplish
its mission of providing safety and security throughout the MTA network.
Proposed
2015-2019
$29
Poughkeepsie Facility
Total
$39
134
135
MTA Interagency
MTA Planning Initiatives
Category N-711
The 2015-2019 Capital Program includes funds for research and analysis to sustain various planning initiatives. The
planning initiatives support the MTA Long Range Planning Framework, which identifies long-term transportation
needs and capital solutions to address those needs, as well as coordinate with emerging needs in the City of New
York.
Proposed
2015-2019
$10
10
125
80
$225
136
Evaluation of Second Avenue Subway (SAS) future phasing opportunities (beyond Phase 2) in support of
implementation of SAS Phase 2 construction. Phase 2 construction is advanced as part of the MTACCs
program in 2015-2019.
In collaboration with MTA commuter railroads:
Supporting analyses to inform regional rail capital initiatives.
Evaluation of proposals by commuter railroads for service/network enhancements leading to capital
investments including additional MNR West of Hudson capacity, LIRR diesel territory service enhancements
and other LIRR Network Strategy outcomes and opportunities for through running of regional rail systems.
Evaluations of regional proposals by outside groups that could lead to MTA capital investments. Examples include
new airport access proposals, new rail uses of dormant rights of ways and new transHudson proposals.
Capital Program Support - $125 million
The 2015-2034 Twenty-Year Capital Needs Assessment and MTA Transportation Reinvention Commission
highlighted the need for ongoing investment in the MTA network to support our diverse and dynamic service region.
This investment is a critical element in maintaining New Yorks standing as one of the worlds preeminent economic
centers. Recognizing this vital need, funds are allocated to a variety of program support tasks, including:
Evaluate and implement strategic recommendations of the MTA Transportation Reinvention Commission.
Improve capital planning through Enterprise Asset Management (EAM) strategies and systems.
Facilitate initiatives designed to enhance operational safety MTA-wide for customers and employees.
Support implementation of new fare payment systems across the MTA family of Agencies.
Evaluate the opportunity to expand SBS through the NYCT/MTA Bus service area.
Develop pilot studies in support of these and additional strategic initiatives.
Urban Core Infrastructure Reserve - $80 million
The 2015-2019 Capital Plan includes funds reserved for the MTA to define projects in collaboration with the City of
New York to study and develop initiatives to support coordination in areas of common interest. The intent is to
bolster the existing MTA system to complement City initiatives on growth, development and mobility with such
additional capital improvements as new access at stations in employment centers, new passenger connections
between lines, and bus facilities. These activities will include a study of intra-city travel on the commuter rail
network, as well as a study of a potential bus station, staging, and/or storage facility in Flushing, Queens. Proposals
for capital improvement will be evaluated using standard planning, design, and engineering controls to ensure that
they become projects that are affordable and achievable.
137
138
2015-2019
140
141
Steering Committee headed by the MTA Chairman, with representatives of MTACC, LIRR, and Amtrak (see
Figure 8).
January 2014 to June 2014: Completed the Program-Wide and Harold Interlocking risk assessments,
additional independent studies and estimates, and review of the Integrated Systems Testing schedule by the
Supplemental Independent Review Consultant.
June 2014: Presented at CPOC the revised ESA cost of $10.178 billion and Revenue Service Date of
December 2022, including reasons for greater budget and schedule certainty, future risks and next steps.
All these steps were taken to ensure that the new budget and schedule sufficiently reflected the remaining type of
work and associated risk, and that the most appropriate ESA organizational structure was in place to successfully
manage the project going forward.
Figure 8
Budget and Schedule Ranges Presented to CPOC in January 2014
$9.693 billion
MTACC
$9.981 billion
$9.792 billion
Supplemental Independent
Independent
Review Consultant
Engineering Consultant
$10.772 billion*
FTA
September 2021
MTACC
November 2022
Supplemental Independent
Review Consultant
June 2023
Independent
Engineering Consultant
September 2023
FTA
Following this review effort, MTACC took further action to ensure ESA was able to advertise and award one of its
critical contracts to maintain the new schedule. The MTA Board amended the MTACC portion of the 2010 -2014
Capital Program to transfer $78.1 million from the ESA Rolling Stock Reserve/Liability Reserve project to the ESA
project so ESA could award GCT Concourse and Facilities Fit-Out contract (CM014B) before the end of 2014. This
action brought the approved ESA funding through the 2010-2014 Capital Program to $7.606 billion. The proposed
2015-2019 Capital Program includes $2.572 billion of additional local funds to complete the project. The proposed
142
2015-2019 Capital Program will also include $78.1 million to replenish the funds transferred from the ESA Rolling
Stock Reserve/Liability Reserve project.
Regional Investments overall budget has been impacted by ESAs revised budget and schedule as well. Driven by
the schedule extension and re-sequencing of work at Harold Interlocking, the proposed 2015-2019 Capital Program
includes $310 million in funds to complete this work.
Table 19
MTA Network Expansion Proposed 2015-2019 Capital Program by Category ($ in millions)
Funding In Prior Capital
Program(s)
Proposed
2015-2019
All
Programs
$7,606
$2,572
$10,178
535
535
695
695
Regional Investments
448
310
758
558
209
767
Miscellaneous/Administration
215
135
350
$8,827
$4,456
$13,283
Category
East Side Access
Total
Numbers may not total due to rounding
143
Project Description
The East Side Access Project will connect the Long Island Rail Roads Port Washington and Main Lines to a new
station at GCT. The connection will be made by constructing seven miles of new tunnels (3.5 miles in each direction)
beginning in Queens, going under Amtraks Sunnyside Yard, connecting to the lower level of the existing 63 rd Street
tunnel, and traveling under Park Avenue in Manhattan to reach GCT. Tail tracks under Park Avenue will extend to
38th Street.
Specific project construction details include:
Construction of a new LIRR station at GCT.
Construction of a new concourse and entrances at GCT.
Construction of a new mid-day storage yard in Queens.
Construction and reconfiguration of LIRRs Harold Interlocking, including boring soft ground tunnels in
Queens under Sunnyside Yard.
Reconstruction of a portion of Yard A for storing trains that serve GCT.
Excavation of tunnels in Manhattan using Tunnel Boring machines.
Following the receipt of a high bid for the Manhattan Structures construction contract in October 2012, MTA Capital
Construction Company in conjunction with the MTA, the Independent Engineering Consultant, the Federal Transit
Administration and a Supplemental Independent Consultant, completed a comprehensive project cost, schedule,
and organizational review, including conducting risk assessments. The results were presented to the MTA Board at
the June 2014 Capital Program Oversight Committee meeting, revising the overall cost by $1.933 billion from
$8.245 billion to $10.178 billion and adjusting the Revenue Service Date from August 2019 to December 2022.
144
Table 20
East Side Access Major Milestones and Forecasts
Major Milestone
Start Preliminary Design
Obtain Record of Decision
Start Early Construction Activities
Award Tunnel Boring Machine Tunneling
Timing
March 1999
May 2001
September 2001
July 2006
December 2006
Complete Construction
November 2019
December 2022
145
Major demolition, civil and structural work and relocation of existing Metro-North tracks in the GCT Madison
Avenue Yard in preparation of future construction of a passenger concourse for LIRR passengers. This work
is complete.
Open-cut excavation adjacent to the existing Sunnyside Yard in Queens and construction of permanent
tunnel structures. This work is complete.
Excavation of tunnels and station caverns in Manhattan from the existing 63rd Street tunnel at 2nd Avenue
to the new station at GCT. This work is complete.
Procurement of long lead materials for force account construction at Harold Interlocking and construction of
new interlockings. This work is complete.
2005-2009 Capital Program
The 2005-2009 Capital Program contains $2.672 billion in ESA funds and $10.5 million funded directly in the LIRR
capital program to continue major construction elements. Elements of project management, design, construction
management, insurance, and real estate necessary to support construction are also funded. The program includes
the following major construction elements:
Construction of the new tunnels in Manhattan. This work is complete.
Construction of bored tunnels under Sunnyside Yard and Harold Interlocking in Queens. This work is
complete.
Construction of the Northern Boulevard Crossing. This work is complete.
Major demolition, civil and structural work and relocation of existing Metro-North tracks in the GCT Madison
Avenue Yard in preparation of future construction of a passenger concourse f or LIRR passengers. This work
is complete.
Begin the reconfiguration of the Harold Interlocking. This work is on-going.
Construction of ventilation facility at 50th Street. This work is complete.
Design and manufacture of elevators and escalators. This work is on-going.
Purchase/acquisition of required real estate interests. This work is on-going.
2010-2014 Capital Program
The 2010-2014 Capital Program contains $3.232 billion in ESA funds to continue major construction elements.
Elements of project management, design, construction management, and insurance necessary to support
construction are also funded. The program includes the following major construction elements:
Construction of the new tunnels in Manhattan. This work is complete.
Construction and fit-out of the new LIRR caverns, concourse and mezzanines at GCT. This work is on-going.
Reconfiguration of the Harold Interlocking and yard lead. This work is on-going.
Procure, fabricate, install, test and commission communication, controls, security, fire detection, tunnel
ventilation and facility power. This work is on-going.
Procure signal equipment. This work is complete.
146
Construction of ventilation, track, power, signals and ancillary systems. This work is on-going.
Begin construction of a new entrance for LIRR customers at Grand Central Terminal. This work is on-going.
147
Project Description
The goal of the project is to relieve crowding and improve reliability on the Lexington line and to improve mobility for
commuters on Manhattans East Side and throughout New York City and the metropolitan area. Numerous
alternatives have been developed and analyzed for a new Second Avenue Subway since it was first conceived in the
1920s. The project is the result of the MTAs MESA (Manhattan East Side Alternatives) major investment study and
subsequent environmental impact statements.
Specific project construction details for the full-length SAS include:
Construction of a two-track 8.5 mile subway line from 125 th Street to Lower Manhattan.
Connection to the rest of the subway system via the 63 rd Street line.
Construction of 16 new, fully accessible subway stations.
Construction of new transfers with other MTA services, including 125 th Street (serving Metro-North and NYC
Transit passengers) and Grand Street Other transfers are being evaluated for 55 th, 42nd, 14th, and Houston
Streets.
148
The full-length Second Avenue Subway will provide two new subway services. One will operate along the full length of
the route between 125th Street and Hanover Square. The other will operate along Second Avenue from 125th Street
to 63rd Street, then travel west along the existing 63 rd Street line and join the Broadway (N/R/Q) line via an existing
connection and serve express stations along 7 th Avenue and Broadway before crossing the Manhattan Bridge to
Brooklyn. Customers traveling to Lower Manhattan on this line can transfer to local services for destinations south of
Canal Street.
The project will be implemented to provide for four operational phases. These could potentially overlap and include:
1) 105th Street to 62nd Street, including connection to the 63 rd Street line; 2) 125th Street to 105th Street; 3) 62nd
Street to Houston Street; and 4) Houston Street to Hanover Square. The MTACC is currently progressing Phase 1,
including three new stations at 96 th Street, 86th Street, and 72nd Street, and new entrances to the existing Lexington
Avenue/63 Street Station at 63rd Street and Third Avenue.
149
Program Efficiencies
The plan assumes savings of $48 million to be realized by utilizing best value procurement practices and resource
strategies in constructing the infrastructure elements of the Penn Station Access project. The types of efficiencies
that will be employed to generate these savings include:
Alternative procurement strategies, such as separate contracts for furnishing and installation of equipment
and design-build.
Coordination of multiple projects on the same section of track, to minimize service diversions and reduce
agency support costs.
Table 21 below shows the elements in which these savings are assumed. Projects in these elements that are
expected to realize savings via efficiencies are starred (**) in the blue pages listing of projects. The budgets of
150
starred projects have been reduced by a fixed percentage (noted in Table 21 below) as compared to the agencys
best estimate at the time of this plan resubmission. Metro-North Railroad will strive to meet these reductions by
incorporating efficiency strategies during project design. Savings may not be achieved consistently across all
projects because some projects may yield greater opportunities than others, but achieving the overall savings by
element, as listed in Table 21 below, is the agencys goal.
Table 21
MTA Capital Construction Company Capital Program Savings Due to Program Efficiencies ($ in millions)
Assumed
% Red. Savings Likely Efficiencies
10%
$26 Alternative procurement strategies;
Work coordination
10%
6 Alternative procurement strategies;
Work coordination
G7110105
G7110106
Power
10%
G7110108
10%
Total
$48
151
design, construction management, and insurance necessary to support construction are also funded. The program
includes the following major elements:
Amtrak fabrication of Central Instrument Locations (CILS).
Construction of the Westbound Bypass in Harold Interlocking.
Purchase of a small number of LIRR cars to support ESA growth.
Construction of an ADA elevator in Grand Central Terminal.
Material procurement and labor for Harold stages 3 and 4.
153
154
Table 22
East Side Access Proposed 2015-2019 Capital Program Reserves ($ in millions)
Project
Proposed
2015-2019
$78
131
Total:
$209
155
156
2015-2019
Facility
Bronx-Whitestone Bridge (BWB)
Year
Opened
1939
1970
Type of Structure
Suspension Span
3,842
Viaducts/Approaches
3,061
3,023
Viaducts/Approaches
2,472
1936
2,193
1950
Vehicular Tunnel
9,137
1937
Lift Bridge
3,985
1940
Vehicular Tunnel
6,414
1936
Suspension Span
2,624
158
Length (Feet)
1961
1964
772
1,600
Viaducts/Approaches
11,742
Ramps
10,935
Suspension Span
2,910
Viaducts/Approaches
8,022
Suspension Span
6,690
Viaducts/Approaches
2,910
Ramps
8,808
159
Table 24
Bridges and Tunnels Proposed 2015 -2019 Capital Program by Facility ($ in millions)
Proposed
2015-2019
Percent
$137
4%
243
9%
116
4%
64
2%
747
26%
56
2%
578
20%
530
19%
Agency Wide
385
14%
$2,856
100%
Facility
Bronx-Whitestone Bridge (BWB)
Total
Numbers may not total due to rounding
Table 25
Bridges and Tunnels Proposed 2015 -2019 Capital Program by Category ($ in millions)
Proposed
2015-2019
Percent
Structures
$803
28%
1,073
38%
206
7%
Utilities
406
14%
94
3%
Miscellaneous
86
3%
188
7%
$2,856
100%
Category
Structural Painting
Total
Numbers may not total due to rounding
160
Program Evolution
This plan for MTA Bridges & Tunnels totals $2.856 billion, which is a reduction of $200 million compared to the
previous B&T 2015-2019 capital plan proposal that was submitted in September 2014. This $200 million reduction
is the net effect of several factors:
Revised Estimates
In the year that has elapsed since the September 2014 plan submission, ongoing inspections at B&Ts facilities
were conducted and projects have advanced further in the design process, resulting in better cost estimate
information upon which to establish project budgets.
Priority Changes
Bridges & Tunnels has updated its Facility Master Plans and reevaluated all projects in the 2015-2019 capital
program to consider new information available since September 2014 and confirm that all critical work is
progressed in the 2015-2019 timeframe. The timing for implementation of some projects was refreshed for better
definition of time lines for major inter-agency coordination, more optimal sequencing of certain multi-phased
projects, and ensuring the most critical needs will be addressed in the capital program. Ongoing bridge and tunnel
inspection results have also been incorporated in the plan resubmission to address newly emerging needs that were
not identified prior to September 2014.
161
Major Investments
Core Infrastructure
Much of the proposed capital program focuses on preservation of assets and maintaining the structural integrity of
the facilities to help reduce risk, modernize to meet current performance standards, optimize facility and operational
efficiencies and improve overall financial performance. The replacement of aging facility components to ensure that
the historic B&T facilities remain in a state of good repair is highly prioritized. To determine the most immediate
structural needs, the seven bridges and two tunnels and other ancillary facilities undergo periodic, comprehensive
condition inspections. The bridges are inspected every two years, in accordance with the New York State Biennial
Bridge Inspection Program, and additional interim inspections are conducted in the years between biennial
inspection cycles on critical components and/or conditions that warrant more in-depth inspection efforts. In
addition, separate underwater and substructure inspections are performed per FHWA and NYSDOT requirements ,
which typically are based on a five year cycle. In-house engineering staff also assesses the overall condition of all
B&T facilities on an ongoing basis. Unlike bridges, federal and state mandated inspection cycles were not previously
specified for tunnels; However, in the 2010-2014 Capital Program, B&T embarked on comprehensive inspection
efforts at the Queens Midtown Tunnel, as well as conducted post Hurricane Sandy tunnel inspections at both
tunnels (HCT and QMT) to help inform major structural capital projects. Beginning in 2015, federal and state
requirements for similar biennial inspection cycles at the tunnels will commence. In general, B&T inspection
protocols have been highly regarded and were recently commended via an independent peer review.
The rehabilitation and replacement of aging equipment and facility components has been the primary focus of B&T
in all of its capital programs. At the Robert F. Kennedy Bridge (RFK), a phased rehabilitation program that began in
the mid-1990s has resulted in a variety of improvements being completed at the facilitys complex array of
roadways and structures that link Queens, Manhattan, and the Bronx. In the two most recent programs, the decks
on both the southbound Manhattan to Queens ramp on Randalls Island and the on-board Harlem River Drive Ramp
on the Manhattan side were replaced as part of projects that also rehabilitated the substructures of those decks. In
addition, the design for the reconstruction of the Manhattan approach ramps at 124 th-125th Streets was completed,
and construction was awarded in late 2014. The replacement of the Bronx Toll Plaza deck also started during the 4 th
quarter of 2014.
The Bronx-Whitestone Bridge (BWB) has also benefitted from a wide range of recent investments with a strong
emphasis on renewing the roadway and deck elements, reducing loads on the main cables and improving the
bridges aerodynamic performance in high wind conditions.
In the 2010-2014 Capital Program, repairs were made to the Bronx concrete anchorage and the Queens elevated
and on-grade approaches were replaced. The completion of the Queens approach work in early 2015 was the final
step in replacing all of the original 1930s era roadways of this facility. While major portions of the BWB roadway
structure were being replaced, concurrent work was carried out at the Throgs Neck Bridge (TNB), including major
repairs to the steel superstructure supporting the deck on the Queens and Bronx approaches.
The Verrazano-Narrows Bridge (VNB), the longest suspension bridge in North America, has multiple decks and an
intricate system of ramps at both ends. The VNB requires continual investment in its roadways, structures and
utilities. Recent improvements either completed or underway include: replacement of the original upper level
suspended span decks with a new orthotropic steel deck, steel repairs and painting on the superstructure,
improvements to the Toll Plaza east and westbound ramps, and a complete rehabilitation of the East-bound Toll
Plaza roadways and Staten Island Expressway approach to the VNB.
162
At the Henry Hudson Bridge (HHB), the upper and lower level decks are being addressed for reconfiguration and/or
replacement. Substructure rehabilitation at the Marine Parkway Bridge (MPB) is ongoing while at the Cross Bay
Bridge (CBB), deck and superstructure rehabilitation, substructure and underwater work are in progress. The
electrical and mechanical equipment associated with the lift span at the MPB will be rehabilitated and or replaced
along with structural steel repairs as needed.
The Hugh L. Carey Tunnel (HCT) and Queens Midtown Tunnel (QMT) were severely affected by flooding during Super
Storm Sandy. As a result, the 2010-2014 Capital Program includes Super Storm Sandy restoration and mitigation
work at these facilities, in conjunction with pre-existing structural rehabilitation projects. Together, these
investments will address all the tunnel assets destroyed when corrosive salt-waters inundated the tubes in October
2012, along with other tunnel elements that were already scheduled for capital renewal in the facility master plans.
The replacement and rehabilitation of the core infrastructure will continue in the proposed 2015-2019 Capital
Program. As always, the suspension bridges will be a major area of investment. At the RFK, the initial phase of
construction of the Manhattan toll plaza and associated enabling projects will begin. At the BWB, a key focus will be
main cable investigation/monitoring, as well as structural repairs that address recent inspection findings. Similar
steel repairs will be carried out at the TNB, but the key projects at this structure will be the replacement of the
concrete grid deck on the suspended spans, dehumidification of anchorages, and addition of fire standpipes on the
main span and Bronx approaches. At the VNB, the replacement of major approach decks will be initiated and
anchorages and bridge piers will be rehabilitated.
Significant core work will also be carried out at the other facilities. At the HHB, the upper and lower level toll plaza
and southbound lower level approach will be replaced. Furthermore, the skewbacks (concrete arch supporting
structures) will be rehabilitated. Pier fender system rehabilitation will be performed at the Cross Bay and Marine
Parkway Bridges.
At the HCT and the QMT, core infrastructure work will include structural, electrical and mechanical rehabilitation of
the ventilation buildings and associated systems, including the tunnel control and monitoring systems and
modernization of central control rooms.
B&T capital projects are planned and designed to minimize the impact of construction on motorists and are carried
out in coordination with the surrounding communities. The agency is committed to maintaining the highest quality of
service for its customers, even while major construction work is ongoing. While some projects can impose potentially
significant operational constraints during construction, the end result of many of these facility improvement s is to
enhance the system and provide better ways for customers to travel through B&T facilities.
163
The 2015-2019 Capital Program will also improve traffic throughput and customer satisfaction at other B&T
facilities, through implementation of capacity and access enhancements. At the VNB, projects are in construction in
the 2010-2014 Capital Program to replace the six-lane upper level suspended span with a new seven-lane upper
level roadway and a Bus/HOV ramp on the Brooklyn Approach. This will result in a new deck configuration linking the
HOV lanes on the Staten Island Expressway to the west and the Gowanus Expressway to the east. In the 2015-2019
Capital Program, another project at the VNB will eliminate a lane-drop that currently causes delays and traffic at the
merge of lower level Brooklyn-bound traffic with the Gowanus Expressway. A design for the replacement and
widening of the Belt Parkway ramps (elevated and on-grade) will also be part of the 2015-2019 program, with
enabling work to be performed first in the 2015-2019 plan and full construction to follow in future capital programs.
At the TNB, the 2015-2019 Capital Program will replace the suspended span deck with a new deck configuration,
which will improve traffic safety and will also be able to accommodate a future seventh lane if mobility demand
dictates it. At the RFK, construction of a new connector ramp will complete a critical missing link to the northbound
Harlem River Drive, eliminating the need for Manhattan-bound highway traffic to utilize local City streets. These
investments will add to improvements already achieved in previous capital programs, such as the BWB roadway
deck project, which replaced the roadway, widened the traffic lanes on the approaches, and improved the lighting
and electrical systems.
On-going tunnel rehabilitation projects will also benefit B&T customers at both the HCT and QMT, with new wall tiles
and lighting that will significantly improve the customer environment inside the tubes, as well as some replacement
/rehabilitation work on the plaza slabs, which will improve the riding surface.
B&T also continues to implement Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) as part of its capital program. In previous
years, TRANSMIT readers were installed at all facilities enabling E-ZPass tags in vehicles passing through to be
anonymously read in order to measure general vehicular speeds on particular segments of roadway. This data is
coordinated with B&T Variable Message Signs (VMS), enabling timely and accurate travel time information to be
communicated to customers. Many of these signs will reach the end of their useful life during the 2015-2019 period
and will be replaced by newer, updated versions. B&T will also be upgrading its fiber optic infrastructure in the
proposed program, supporting the backbone for communications and implementation of ITS devices and systems.
No project in B&Ts history has done more to improve regional mobility and cust omer satisfaction than E-ZPass. In
the 2010-2014 Capital Program, B&T began replacing outdated components of the original E-ZPass system that was
first implemented in 1995. Original power and communications cables were replaced or upgraded to increase data
capacity and accommodate new ITS features. In the 2015-2019 Capital Program, B&T will continue replacing
outdated E-ZPass components and tolling equipment, so customers can continue to enjoy the benefits of E-ZPass.
164
requirements. Similar fire standpipe systems are being installed under the 2010-2014 Capital Program at the RFK
Manhattan Approach Ramps, as part of the ramp reconstruction projects.
Building upon these efforts to implement fire safety enhancements, B&T plans to ensure that fire standpipe systems
are installed at every facility. In the 2015-2019 timeframe, a new system will be installed at the MPB, additional
coverage will be provided at BWB and TNB, and the systems on the RFK and TNB will be completed. At the VNB, the
mooring platforms at the tower piers will be relocated to meet current Fire Department of New York (FDNY)
standards, along with necessary modifications to the fire standpipes. Additional fire lines accessible by fireboats will
also be added at the BWB. Other fire safety improvements in the 2015-2019 timeframe will include new smoke and
heat detection and alarm systems at the BWB, RFK, HCT and QMT. Similar improvements are already underway at
the TNB and MPB, under the 2010-2014 Capital Program.
The proposed 2015-2019 capital program also includes the replacement or upgrade of various tunnel electrical and
ventilation systems. These will improve the reliability and safety of tunnel operations, including during emergencies,
and conform to current tunnel safety codes and standards. At the QMT specifically, the outdated central control
room will be modernized to improve day-to-day monitoring of power system controls and other systems such as
traffic control and signaling, variable message signs, traffic speed sensors, radio rebroadcast, over height detection,
drainage pumps, tunnel lighting, and digital CCTV recording.
Other safety investments will include the design-build installation of a fender protection system at the BWB to
protect against vessel strikes as well as design for a similar protection system at the TNB. Finally, an electronic
monitoring and detection system is in the process of being installed at the TNB and similar systems are planned in
the 2015-2019 Capital Program at the BWB and RFK.
Resiliency
In the aftermath of Super Storm Sandy, the Governors Office published the NYS 2100 Commission Report, To
Improve the Strength and Resilience of the Empire States Infrastructure. The report examined key vulnerabilities
faced by the States infrastructure and developed recommendations for how to increase resiliency. The
recommendations re-enforced B&Ts existing resiliency strategies, which emphasized focus on seismic, marine
vessel collisions, fire and wind vulnerability risks and reinforced the need to add additional emphasis on climate
change induced hazards such as flood conditions. These directly affected facility master plans, focusing further
attention on a multi-hazard approach to mitigate natural and man-made risks. The 2015-2019 program will address
some of the major recommendations in the report, including retrofitting bridges and tunnels to withstand seismic
activity, as well as wind and fire events.
Mitigating climate change risks requires an assessment of broad systemic vulnerabilities, including sea level rise,
storm surge, changing precipitation, changing temperature, and other extreme events. The 2010-2014 Sandy
Mitigation Program was a start towards addressing B&T risks at the two tunnels and Rockaway crossings. The
proposed 2015-2019 program continues this strategy at these and other facilities, through initiatives that will help
to ensure the bridges and tunnels remain resilient against future catastrophic events.
The 2015-2019 Capital Program will implement recommendations from a tunnel vulnerability assessment, providing
a variety of structural and safety enhancements at the HCT and QMT. At the RFK, B&T will harden the structure
against future seismic and wind events, while proposed structural and deck work at the TNB, VNB and HHB will
incorporate seismic improvements whenever possible. This aligns with the MTA-wide strategy of incorporating
appropriate resiliency elements across core infrastructure projects. B&T will also design and install bridge structural
165
health monitoring systems, which track how bridges react to daily and extreme loads. This data will enable better
planning, design and construction of future projects that will preserve the structural integrity of these facilities.
System Condition
MTA Bridges and Tunnels developed its first multi-year capital program in 1992. Since then, the agency has invested
approximately $5.7 billion in capital funding for its infrastructure. While all B&T facilities are in a state of good
repair, more than half are over 70 years old. Even with regular maintenance, the structures and components of the
bridges and tunnels eventually deteriorate and need replacement from the combined effects of traffic loa ds and
environmental exposure. As B&T facilities continue to age, increasing levels of major improvements and life-cycle
replacements have become necessary. As major components reach the end of their useful lives, higher levels of
capital investment are needed just to keep them structurally sound. The goal for the 2015-2019 Capital Program is
to carry out a fully funded capital program that will keep the facilities in a state of good repair, ensure a high level of
reliability, resiliency and redundancy, and strategically improve facility operations and customer experience
wherever appropriate. B&T average annual commitments are projected to increase from $416 million in the
previous 2010-2014 Capital Program (excluding post-Sandy investments), to $571 million in the proposed program.
Figure 9
Bridges and Tunnels Proposed 2015 -2019 Capital Program by Needs Category
System
Im provement
11%
Other
3%
N ormal
Replacement
86%
Because B&Ts facilities are considered to be in a state of good repair, the vast majority of proposed investments
over the 2015-2019 time frame are classified as normal replacement (NR) work ($2.47 billion, or 86%) for assets
that have reached or exceeded their useful life. System Improvement (SI) projects account for just 11% of the total
program ($0.30 billion), while Other work comprises 3% of the total program ($0.08 billion). NR work renews
facilities, ensuring safe and reliable transportation for B&T customers. SI projects enhance facility operations and
security, enable customers to proceed through toll plazas more efficiently, and/or continue improvement of the
workplace for B&T employees.
166
167
Verrazano-Narrows Bridge: Anchorage & Piers Rehabilitation and Sealing - $49 million
This project will perform exterior and interior concrete repair and sealing of the Brooklyn and Staten Island
anchorages, improvements to the anchorage lighting, drainage, fire detection systems, and catwalks, and
rehabilitation of the eye bar dehumidification chambers and systems. The work will address water infiltration and
lower humidity levels in the anchorages to help protect the main cables from deterioration.
Cross Bay Bridge: Rehabilitation of Pier Fender System at Cross Bay and Marine Parkway Bridges - $49 million
This project will rehabilitate or replace the pier fender protection systems at the Cross Bay and Marine Parkway
bridges as necessary. Environmental mitigation measures will be incorporated, based on requirements of permitting
agencies.
Verrazano-Narrows Bridge: Main Cable and Suspender Rope Testing - $43 million
This project will carry out cable inspections to determine the overall health of the cable system. Several panels on
each main cable will be unwrapped and cable bands will be removed. Other tasks include inspection of the cables for
corrosion, sampling of wires, and re-wrapping of the cables. Cable modeling will be performed using the data gathered
to determine the remaining overall cable strength, and a cable health monitoring system will be evaluated for
installation in the main cables. Design for this project is being performed in the 2010-2014 program. The construction
phase will be carried out in the proposed 2015-2019 program.
Verrazano-Narrows Bridge: Main Steel Repair and Concrete Rehabilitation - $33 million
This project will perform structural repairs as necessary based on findings and recommendations from biennial
inspections in 2014 and 2016, as well as steel and concrete repairs required in the near future to maintain or
restore the bridge's intended level of service. Typical biennial recommended repairs include steel repairs, concrete
repairs, bearing replacement/rehabilitation, etc.
Bronx-Whitestone Bridge: Miscellaneous Structural Rehabilitation - $29 million
This project will perform high priority repairs recommended in recent biennial inspections, as well as address
potential findings from future inspections planned in 2015 and 2017. Select roadway framing connections will be
upgraded to meet current load standards. The project will also remove the non-functional Tuned Mass Damper
(relieving a substantial load on the bridge cables), the associated maintenance/inspection platforms, and remaining
portions of the stiffening truss from the structure, while modifying the traveler rails. This will allow the travelers (i.e.,
moving maintenance platforms) full access to the under-deck area.
168
169
complete the highway interchange and eliminate the need for Manhattan-bound RFK traffic to utilize local city
streets to reach the northbound HRD.
Agency Wide: Planning / Strategic Initiatives - $51 million
This project will encompass planning, design and/or construction efforts to address a variety of planning and
strategic initiatives, which may include All-Electronic Tolling (AET), Open Road Tolling (ORT), customer information
enhancements, reconstruction of the overhead plaza structures at the HCT Manhattan Plaza, and/or shared-use
pathways.
Verrazano-Narrows Bridge: Brooklyn Approach Reconstruction - $31 million
This project will widen the existing eastbound Gowanus Expressway from 92nd Street to Fort Hamilton Parkway,
improving the merge of Brooklyn-bound VNB lower level traffic with the Gowanus Expressway. The project will
improve traffic flow and safety, and reduce traffic delays in the critical I-278 corridor between the VNB and HCT. This
work will also require extensive interagency coordination with the New York State Department of Transportation
(NYSDOT).
170
171
172
173
174
175
2015-2019
177
178
Project Listings
Here are some helpful tips for navigating the project listings that follow.
Organization
Capital investments are organized and coded according to an Agency / Category / Element / Project (ACEP)
hierarchy:
Agency: MTA Agency responsible for project delivery (e.g., New York City Transit);
Category: Agency subset, typically focused on a particular asset type (e.g., Stations or Track);
Element: Category subset containing related projects (e.g., Signal Modernization element in Signals &
Communications category);
Project: Basic unit of the Capital Plan, reflecting a specific scope, schedule, and budget.
For example, the first project listing page is identified in the upper-left corner as Agency New York City Transit, and
in the upper-right corner as Category Subway Cars. Below that, T - 701" represents the Agency (T for New York
City Transit) and the category code (701 for subway cars). Further down the page, 01 Subway Cars refers to the
element, which in this case happens to have the same name as the parent category. Finally, this element has a
single project with identifier code 01, to Purchase 940 B Division Railcars. Combining all of the codes, the
unique ACEP for this project is T7010101.
Needs Codes
The focus of each project is indicated by its needs code:
State of Good Repair (SGR) projects renew assets that have surpassed their useful life, to achieve SGR.
Normal Replacement (NR) projects renew assets that are nearing the end of their useful life, to preserve
SGR.
System Improvement (SI) projects enhance the network, providing new capabilities and a better customer
experience.
Network Expansion (NE) projects extend the reach of the MTA network, expanding the service offering.
Administrative projects (e.g., insurance, scope development) are not assigned needs codes.
Commitments
Columns indicate the share of the project budget that is planned to be committed (i.e., started) in each year of the
2015-2019 period, along with the total for all years. Selected projects are starred (**), indicating that they are
expected to realize savings via efficiencies.
179
180
SUBWAY CARS
T - 701
Commitments
($ in millions)
ELEMENT
DESCRIPTION/PROJECT
NEEDS
CODE
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
Total
All Years
01 SUBWAY CARS
01
NR
0.0
800.0
0.0
920.0
1,184.0
2,904.0
02
SI
0.0
52.4
0.0
0.0
0.0
52.4
Element Total 01
Category Total 701
$0.0
$852.4
$0.0
$920.0
$1,184.0
$2,956.4
$0.0
$852.4
$0.0
$920.0
$1,184.0
$2,956.4
181
BUSES
T - 703
Commitments
($ in millions)
ELEMENT
DESCRIPTION/PROJECT
NEEDS
CODE
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
Total
All Years
397.8
02 BUS REPLACEMENT
01
SGR
0.3
397.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
02
NR
0.3
84.8
0.0
0.0
0.0
85.1
03
NR
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.4
127.4
127.8
04
NR
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.4
66.6
67.0
05
NR
0.0
0.2
168.1
0.0
0.0
168.3
06
NR
0.0
0.3
0.0
0.0
36.2
36.6
12
SI
0.6
5.8
0.0
0.0
0.0
6.4
13
SI
0.5
5.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
5.7
14
NR
0.1
106.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
106.4
15
NR
0.0
19.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
19.0
$1.9
$619.0
$168.1
$0.8
$230.2
$1,020.0
$1.9
$619.0
$168.1
$0.8
$230.2
$1,020.0
Element Total 02
Category Total 703
182
PASSENGER STATIONS
T - 704
Commitments
($ in millions)
ELEMENT
DESCRIPTION/PROJECT
NEEDS
CODE
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
Total
All Years
04 FARE COLLECTION
01
SI
0.0
0.0
318.1
0.0
100.5
418.6
02
SI
0.0
6.6
0.0
0.0
0.0
6.6
$0.0
$6.6
$318.1
$0.0
$100.5
$425.2
Element Total 04
SGR
0.0
0.0
4.7
0.0
36.7
41.4
02
NR
3.8
0.0
40.9
0.0
0.0
44.7
03
NR
2.9
0.0
24.9
0.0
0.0
27.9
04
NR
0.0
1.9
0.0
22.4
0.0
24.3
23.4
05
SGR
0.9
9.7
0.0
12.9
0.0
06
SGR
1.5
0.0
11.8
0.0
0.0
13.3
07
SGR
0.0
0.0
2.1
0.0
35.2
37.2
08
SGR
0.0
3.1
2.1
31.1
23.5
59.8
09
SGR
0.0
2.7
0.0
43.7
0.0
46.4
10
NR
1.5
0.0
13.5
0.0
0.0
15.0
$10.6
$17.4
$100.0
$110.1
$95.4
$333.5
Element Total 07
183
PASSENGER STATIONS
T - 704
Commitments
($ in millions)
ELEMENT
DESCRIPTION/PROJECT
NEEDS
CODE
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
Total
All Years
12 STATION WORK
01
SGR
1.9
0.0
41.5
0.0
0.0
43.4
02
SGR
1.4
20.6
0.0
0.0
0.0
22.0
03
SGR
1.1
11.8
0.0
0.0
0.0
12.9
04
SGR
1.6
0.0
16.4
0.0
0.0
18.0
05
Renewal: 30 Av AST
SGR
1.2
16.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
17.5
06
SGR
1.0
13.8
0.0
0.0
0.0
14.8
07
Renewal: 36 Av AST
SGR
1.1
15.9
0.0
0.0
0.0
17.0
08
Renewal: 39 Av AST
SGR
1.0
13.7
0.0
0.0
0.0
14.8
09
SGR
1.4
0.0
0.0
46.9
0.0
48.2
10
SGR
1.3
0.0
0.0
15.1
0.0
16.4
11
SGR
1.3
0.0
0.0
17.1
0.0
18.4
12
SGR
1.4
0.0
0.0
20.8
0.0
22.2
13
SGR
1.1
0.0
17.3
0.0
0.0
18.4
14
SGR
1.1
0.0
15.3
0.0
0.0
16.4
15
SGR
1.1
0.0
14.5
0.0
0.0
15.6
16
SGR
1.2
0.0
15.2
0.0
0.0
16.3
17
Renewal: 69 St FLS
SGR
0.0
0.0
1.5
0.0
15.6
17.1
18
SGR
0.0
0.0
1.6
0.0
16.1
17.7
19
Renewal: 52 St FLS
SGR
0.0
0.0
1.6
0.0
17.0
18.5
20
SGR
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.5
21.4
22.8
21
SGR
0.7
7.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
7.7
22
SGR
0.0
1.1
0.0
10.9
0.0
12.0
23
SGR
0.3
1.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.7
24
SGR
0.3
2.6
0.0
0.0
0.0
2.8
25
SGR
0.4
4.6
0.0
0.0
0.0
5.0
26
SGR
4.6
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
4.6
28
SGR
15.9
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
15.9
29
SGR
0.4
4.8
0.0
0.0
0.0
5.2
31
SGR
0.7
5.8
0.0
0.0
0.0
6.4
32
SGR
0.7
0.0
7.4
0.0
0.0
8.1
34
SGR
0.3
0.0
3.1
0.0
0.0
3.4
35
SGR
1.0
0.0
14.0
0.0
0.0
15.1
5.9
36
SGR
0.0
0.6
5.4
0.0
0.0
37
SGR
0.5
0.0
5.8
0.0
0.0
6.4
38
SGR
0.0
0.6
6.1
0.0
0.0
6.7
40
SGR
0.3
2.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
2.6
41
SGR
0.0
0.0
1.0
0.0
9.4
10.4
42
SGR
0.1
0.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.6
184
PASSENGER STATIONS
T - 704
Commitments
($ in millions)
ELEMENT
DESCRIPTION/PROJECT
NEEDS
CODE
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
Total
All Years
12 STATION WORK
43
SGR
0.4
5.9
0.0
0.0
0.0
6.3
44
SGR
0.2
0.9
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.0
45
SGR
0.4
3.7
0.0
0.0
0.0
4.1
46
SGR
7.3
2.0
19.7
0.0
0.0
29.0
47
SGR
0.8
6.9
0.0
0.0
0.0
7.7
48
SGR
0.0
0.8
0.0
7.7
0.0
8.5
50
SGR
0.0
1.3
0.0
13.8
0.0
15.1
51
SGR
1.5
0.0
26.8
0.0
0.0
28.3
52
SGR
0.0
0.7
5.8
0.0
0.0
6.5
53
SGR
0.0
0.0
9.6
0.0
0.0
9.6
54
SGR
0.1
0.0
0.4
0.0
0.0
0.4
56
SGR
0.1
0.0
0.7
0.0
0.0
0.7
57
SGR
0.5
0.0
6.2
0.0
0.0
6.7
58
SGR
0.2
0.0
1.7
0.0
0.0
1.9
59
SGR
0.2
0.0
0.8
0.0
0.0
1.0
60
SGR
1.3
0.0
10.0
0.0
0.0
11.2
61
SGR
0.0
0.0
2.2
0.0
13.0
15.1
62
SGR
0.6
0.0
5.4
0.0
0.0
6.0
63
SGR
0.9
0.0
11.6
0.0
0.0
12.4
64
SGR
0.0
0.0
0.8
0.0
8.0
8.9
65
SGR
0.0
1.4
0.0
14.0
0.0
15.5
66
SGR
0.0
3.6
0.0
42.4
0.0
45.9
67
SGR
0.0
5.4
0.0
53.1
0.0
58.5
68
SGR
0.0
0.0
0.0
6.0
0.0
6.0
69
SGR
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.5
0.0
0.6
70
SGR
0.0
1.3
0.0
12.8
0.0
14.1
71
SGR
0.0
0.2
0.0
1.5
0.0
1.7
72
SGR
0.0
0.4
0.0
3.8
0.0
4.2
73
SGR
0.0
0.4
0.0
2.1
0.0
2.4
74
SGR
0.0
0.8
0.0
7.6
0.0
8.4
75
SGR
0.0
0.0
0.8
0.0
8.0
8.9
76
SGR
0.0
0.0
1.6
0.0
21.2
22.8
25.4
77
SGR
0.0
0.0
2.1
0.0
23.3
78
SGR
0.0
0.0
0.3
0.0
1.5
1.8
79
SGR
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
8.0
8.0
80
SGR
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.4
0.4
81
SGR
0.0
0.0
1.6
0.0
15.7
17.3
82
SGR
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.3
0.4
185
PASSENGER STATIONS
T - 704
Commitments
($ in millions)
ELEMENT
DESCRIPTION/PROJECT
NEEDS
CODE
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
Total
All Years
12 STATION WORK
83
SGR
0.0
0.0
0.3
0.0
1.3
1.6
84
SGR
0.0
0.0
0.5
0.0
2.6
3.2
85
SGR
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.0
1.4
1.6
86
SGR
0.0
0.0
0.6
0.0
4.4
5.0
87
SGR
0.0
0.9
0.0
7.7
0.0
8.5
88
SGR
0.0
0.2
0.0
2.1
0.0
2.3
SGR
89
Element Total 12
0.0
0.1
0.0
1.2
0.0
1.3
$60.9
$160.0
$277.2
$288.4
$188.7
$975.3
13 DISABLED ACCESSIBILITY
01
SI
3.2
36.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
39.3
02
SI
4.3
0.0
30.7
0.0
0.0
35.0
03
SI
3.6
26.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
30.2
04
ADA: 86 St 4AV
SI
3.2
0.0
25.6
0.0
0.0
28.9
05
SI
3.4
38.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
41.5
06
SI
3.6
0.0
27.5
0.0
0.0
31.1
07
SI
9.6
0.0
235.4
0.0
0.0
245.0
08
SI
3.3
0.0
29.1
0.0
0.0
32.4
09
SI
0.0
3.3
0.0
22.4
0.0
25.7
10
ADA: 59 St 4AV
SI
3.7
0.0
0.0
44.9
0.0
48.6
11
SI
0.6
5.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
6.1
12
ADA: 1 Av CNR
SI
4.7
54.4
0.0
0.0
0.0
59.1
14
SI
3.0
20.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
23.1
15
SI
4.1
0.0
40.5
0.0
0.0
44.6
16
SI
2.4
0.0
21.6
0.0
0.0
24.0
17
SI
0.0
0.0
10.0
0.0
0.0
10.0
18
SI
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.0
0.0
0.2
19
SI
0.0
0.0
0.0
15.0
0.0
15.0
$52.7
$183.9
$420.6
$82.3
$0.0
$739.5
Element Total 13
186
PASSENGER STATIONS
T - 704
Commitments
($ in millions)
ELEMENT
DESCRIPTION/PROJECT
NEEDS
CODE
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
Total
All Years
NR
1.1
9.7
0.0
0.0
0.0
10.8
02
SI
0.0
0.0
75.0
0.0
0.0
75.0
03
SI
1.5
13.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
15.0
04
SGR
1.1
0.0
28.9
0.0
0.0
30.0
05
SGR
0.2
8.6
0.0
0.0
0.0
8.8
06
Station Railings
SGR
0.3
3.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
3.8
07
NR
8.9
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
8.9
08
SGR
0.0
0.0
0.2
5.0
0.0
5.2
09
SGR
48.4
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
48.4
10
NR
30.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
30.0
11
SI
2.6
38.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
40.5
12
SGR
1.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.0
SI
13
Element Total 14
Category Total 704
0.0
0.0
0.0
30.0
0.0
30.0
$95.0
$73.3
$104.1
$35.0
$0.0
$307.5
$219.2
$441.2
$1,220.1
$515.9
$384.5
$2,781.0
187
TRACK
T - 705
Commitments
($ in millions)
ELEMENT
DESCRIPTION/PROJECT
NEEDS
CODE
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
Total
All Years
255.1
NR
255.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
02
NR
2.1
192.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
194.2
03
NR
0.0
2.3
227.9
0.0
0.0
230.3
04
NR
0.0
0.0
2.2
216.8
0.0
219.0
05
NR
0.0
0.0
0.0
2.2
216.8
219.0
06
NR
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
2.1
2.1
07
NR
64.4
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
64.4
08
NR
0.0
88.9
0.0
0.0
0.0
88.9
09
NR
0.0
0.0
35.9
0.0
0.0
35.9
10
NR
0.0
0.0
0.0
35.9
0.0
35.9
11
NR
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
35.9
35.9
12
NR
35.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
35.0
13
NR
0.0
35.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
35.0
14
NR
0.0
0.0
35.0
0.0
0.0
35.0
15
NR
0.0
0.0
0.0
35.0
0.0
35.0
16
NR
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
35.0
35.0
$356.6
$318.3
$301.0
$289.9
$289.7
$1,555.4
45.6
Element Total 02
NR
45.6
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
02
NR
3.6
52.6
0.0
0.0
0.0
56.3
03
NR
0.0
4.0
65.8
0.0
0.0
69.8
04
NR
0.0
0.0
3.3
54.1
0.0
57.3
05
NR
0.0
0.0
0.0
3.3
54.1
57.3
06
NR
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
3.4
3.4
Element Total 03
Category Total 705
188
$49.2
$56.6
$69.1
$57.3
$57.5
$289.8
$405.8
$374.9
$370.1
$347.2
$347.2
$1,845.2
LINE EQUIPMENT
T - 706
Commitments
($ in millions)
ELEMENT
DESCRIPTION/PROJECT
NEEDS
CODE
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
Total
All Years
30.7
05 LINE EQUIPMENT
01
SGR
0.0
1.1
29.6
0.0
0.0
02
SGR
1.6
0.0
12.2
0.0
0.0
13.8
03
SGR
4.2
0.0
35.8
0.0
0.0
40.0
100.0
04
SGR
0.0
0.0
5.0
0.0
95.0
05
SGR
0.0
0.0
5.9
56.9
0.0
62.8
06
SGR
0.0
0.0
6.2
0.0
93.8
100.0
07
SGR
0.0
5.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
5.0
08
SGR
0.0
0.0
3.0
0.0
22.0
25.0
$5.9
$6.1
$97.7
$56.9
$210.8
$377.3
$5.9
$6.1
$97.7
$56.9
$210.8
$377.3
Element Total 05
Category Total 706
189
LINE STRUCTURES
T - 707
Commitments
($ in millions)
ELEMENT
DESCRIPTION/PROJECT
NEEDS
CODE
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
Total
All Years
NR
20.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
20.3
02
NR
1.1
11.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
12.2
03
NR
0.0
1.2
14.4
0.0
0.0
15.7
04
NR
1.6
59.8
0.0
0.0
0.0
61.3
05
NR
0.0
2.0
0.0
18.0
0.0
20.0
06
NR
0.0
12.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
12.0
07
NR
0.0
0.0
17.0
0.0
0.0
17.0
08
NR
0.0
2.1
16.7
0.0
0.0
18.8
10
SGR
2.2
22.9
0.0
0.0
0.0
25.0
11
SGR
1.0
32.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
33.1
12
SGR
0.7
10.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
11.0
13
SGR
0.9
0.0
31.9
0.0
0.0
32.8
14
SGR
0.0
1.1
0.0
0.0
44.8
45.9
15
SGR
0.0
1.2
26.7
0.0
0.0
27.9
16
SGR
1.2
36.7
0.0
0.0
0.0
37.9
17
Overcoat: 48 St - 72 St FLS
SGR
0.0
0.0
1.1
0.0
27.5
28.5
19
SGR
5.8
6.0
290.4
82.9
41.5
426.4
20
SGR
0.0
11.0
10.0
10.0
9.0
40.0
21
SGR
0.0
40.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
40.0
22
SGR
0.0
0.0
1.2
0.0
0.0
1.2
Element Total 03
Category Total 707
190
$34.8
$249.6
$409.4
$110.9
$122.7
$927.3
$34.8
$249.6
$409.4
$110.9
$122.7
$927.3
ELEMENT
DESCRIPTION/PROJECT
NEEDS
CODE
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
Total
All Years
338.2
03 SIGNAL MODERNIZATION
01
SGR
6.1
332.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
02
NR
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.0
0.0
1.0
04
SGR
0.0
10.6
0.0
528.6
0.0
539.1
06
SGR
0.8
4.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
5.0
07
SGR
2.4
0.0
113.9
0.0
0.0
116.3
08
SGR
6.1
163.9
0.0
0.0
0.0
170.1
17
SGR
0.0
3.9
0.0
125.8
0.0
129.7
18
SGR
0.0
3.7
0.0
115.6
0.0
119.3
19
NR
15.2
0.0
17.8
0.0
0.0
33.0
21
NR
13.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
13.5
22
NR
0.0
0.0
28.8
0.0
0.0
28.8
23
NR
0.0
18.8
0.0
0.0
0.0
18.8
24
NR
0.0
0.0
0.5
0.0
6.9
7.4
25
SGR
1.5
0.0
14.1
0.0
0.0
15.6
26
NR
0.0
0.0
4.8
65.6
0.0
70.4
27
NR
0.0
0.0
4.5
40.5
0.0
45.0
29
NR
0.0
0.0
1.1
0.0
0.0
1.1
30
SGR
0.0
0.0
5.1
0.0
160.5
165.7
31
SI
0.0
0.0
10.0
0.0
0.0
10.0
32
SGR
4.6
0.0
162.1
0.0
0.0
166.6
33
SGR
4.5
0.0
142.4
0.0
0.0
146.9
NR
34
Element Total 03
0.0
0.0
10.0
0.0
0.0
10.0
$54.8
$537.3
$515.1
$877.0
$167.4
$2,151.7
191
ELEMENT
DESCRIPTION/PROJECT
NEEDS
CODE
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
Total
All Years
61.0
06 COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS
01
NR
6.1
0.0
54.9
0.0
0.0
02
NR
1.0
44.4
0.0
0.0
0.0
45.5
03
NR
21.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
21.0
04
SGR
0.0
0.0
28.7
0.0
0.0
28.7
05
SGR
1.0
7.9
8.5
0.0
0.0
17.4
06
SGR
0.0
2.5
22.5
0.0
0.0
25.0
07
NR
0.0
3.9
0.0
31.0
0.0
34.9
09
SGR
2.5
0.0
22.5
0.0
0.0
25.0
10
SI
36.9
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
36.9
11
SI
17.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
17.3
12
SI
3.0
15.4
0.0
0.0
0.0
18.5
13
NR
0.0
0.8
7.6
0.0
0.0
8.4
14
SI
0.0
0.0
121.7
0.0
0.0
121.7
17
NR
1.4
0.0
0.0
16.4
0.0
17.8
18
SI
0.0
5.0
10.0
10.0
5.0
30.0
19
SGR
2.5
0.0
22.5
0.0
0.0
25.0
20
SI
0.0
55.8
24.3
0.0
0.0
80.1
$92.7
$135.8
$323.1
$57.4
$5.0
$614.0
$147.4
$673.1
$838.3
$934.4
$172.4
$2,765.7
Element Total 06
Category Total 708
192
TRACTION POWER
T - 709
Commitments
($ in millions)
ELEMENT
DESCRIPTION/PROJECT
NEEDS
CODE
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
Total
All Years
02 SUBSTATIONS
01
SGR
0.0
2.6
28.5
0.0
0.0
31.1
02
SGR
1.7
32.9
0.0
0.0
0.0
34.7
03
SGR
2.1
0.0
0.0
34.7
0.0
36.8
04
SGR
0.0
0.9
0.0
8.1
0.0
9.0
05
SGR
1.1
0.0
23.8
0.0
0.0
24.9
06
SGR
5.3
0.0
0.0
47.8
0.0
53.1
07
SGR
0.0
0.0
0.0
2.3
0.0
2.3
08
SGR
1.1
6.8
0.0
0.0
0.0
8.0
09
SGR
1.4
9.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
10.9
10
SI
0.7
19.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
19.9
11
SI
5.5
98.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
103.7
15
SI
0.0
0.0
2.2
0.0
85.9
88.1
18
SI
0.7
0.0
20.3
0.0
0.0
20.9
19
SI
0.0
0.0
4.5
0.0
40.5
45.0
20
SI
0.0
0.0
2.5
0.0
57.5
60.0
$19.6
$170.2
$81.7
$92.8
$183.9
$548.3
Element Total 02
04 POWER DISTRIBUTION
01
SGR
0.0
1.8
12.7
0.0
0.0
14.4
03
SGR
2.3
0.0
27.8
0.0
0.0
30.1
04
SGR
0.5
0.0
2.0
0.0
0.0
2.5
06
SGR
1.6
0.0
14.5
0.0
0.0
16.1
07
SGR
0.0
1.5
0.0
12.2
0.0
13.7
10
SGR
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.0
9.0
10.0
11
NR
1.4
0.0
12.8
0.0
0.0
14.2
12
SGR
5.0
0.0
45.0
0.0
0.0
50.0
13
SGR
0.0
2.5
0.0
22.5
0.0
25.0
14
SGR
3.0
0.0
27.0
0.0
0.0
30.0
15
SGR
0.0
0.9
0.0
7.7
0.0
8.5
16
SGR
0.0
0.0
0.0
10.0
0.0
10.0
$13.8
$6.6
$141.8
$53.4
$9.0
$224.5
$33.4
$176.8
$223.5
$146.2
$192.9
$772.8
Element Total 04
Category Total 709
193
ELEMENT
DESCRIPTION/PROJECT
NEEDS
CODE
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
Total
All Years
25.7
DCE Shop Compnts Ph1: 180 St, CI, PEL, PEL Dsl **
SGR
2.3
0.0
23.5
0.0
0.0
02
SGR
3.3
0.0
56.7
0.0
0.0
60.0
03
DCE Shop Compnts Ph2: 239 St, Concrs, ENY [SBDP]** SGR
0.0
2.2
0.0
28.8
0.0
31.0
04
SGR
0.0
0.0
0.8
0.0
3.0
3.8
05
SGR
0.0
0.0
1.1
0.0
11.4
12.5
06
SGR
0.0
0.0
3.5
62.2
0.0
65.7
07
SGR
1.4
0.0
13.4
0.0
0.0
14.8
08
SI
0.0
1.9
0.0
15.6
0.0
17.5
09
NR
0.0
10.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
10.0
10
SGR
1.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.0
11
SGR
0.1
3.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
3.1
12
SGR
0.0
0.0
2.3
0.0
0.0
2.3
13
SGR
0.0
0.0
0.0
2.3
0.0
2.3
14
SGR
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
2.3
2.3
15
SGR
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.1
16
SGR
2.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
2.0
17
SGR
0.1
4.6
0.0
0.0
0.0
4.7
18
SGR
0.0
0.1
3.7
0.0
0.0
3.8
19
SGR
0.0
0.0
0.1
3.7
0.0
3.8
20
SGR
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
3.7
3.8
21
SGR
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.1
22
SGR
2.0
0.0
21.3
0.0
0.0
23.3
23
SGR
0.0
5.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
5.0
24
NR
11.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
11.0
27
Yard CCTV - Ph 3
SI
0.0
4.5
17.6
0.0
0.0
22.1
28
NR
0.0
0.0
2.0
0.0
0.0
2.0
29
SGR
0.0
6.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
6.1
30
SI
0.0
0.0
3.0
0.0
0.0
3.0
31
SGR
0.0
0.0
0.0
10.0
0.0
10.0
Element Total 04
Category Total 710
194
$23.1
$37.5
$149.0
$122.6
$20.5
$352.8
$23.1
$37.5
$149.0
$122.6
$20.5
$352.8
DEPOTS
T - 712
Commitments
($ in millions)
ELEMENT
DESCRIPTION/PROJECT
NEEDS
CODE
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
Total
All Years
SI
0.8
0.0
10.3
0.0
0.0
11.1
02
NR
1.0
0.0
11.0
0.0
0.0
12.0
03
NR
2.8
0.0
32.9
0.0
0.0
35.7
04
SI
0.2
0.0
2.4
0.0
0.0
2.6
05
NR
1.7
0.0
19.2
0.0
0.0
20.8
06
NR
0.0
1.7
0.0
19.9
0.0
21.6
07
NR
0.0
1.9
0.0
28.1
0.0
30.0
08
NR
0.0
2.1
0.0
24.9
0.0
27.0
10
NR
12.9
0.0
0.0
285.3
0.0
298.2
11
NR
0.0
0.0
10.0
0.0
0.0
10.0
$19.3
$5.7
$85.9
$358.2
$0.0
$469.0
Element Total 03
04 DEPOT IMPROVEMENTS
01
SGR
1.2
0.0
8.7
0.0
0.0
9.8
02
NR
0.5
0.0
7.0
0.0
0.0
7.6
03
SI
5.8
3.8
4.8
4.8
4.8
24.0
04
SI
0.5
0.0
4.5
0.0
0.0
5.0
05
NR
1.6
20.8
0.0
0.0
0.0
22.4
06
NR
0.0
2.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
2.5
07
NR
0.8
0.0
4.7
0.0
0.0
5.5
08
NR
2.1
0.0
14.0
0.0
0.0
16.1
10
SI
0.0
0.0
5.0
0.0
0.0
5.0
11
NR
0.0
0.0
0.0
6.6
0.0
6.6
12
NR
8.9
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
8.9
Element Total 04
Category Total 712
$21.4
$27.1
$48.7
$11.4
$4.8
$113.3
$40.7
$32.8
$134.5
$369.6
$4.8
$582.4
195
SERVICE VEHICLES
T - 713
Commitments
($ in millions)
ELEMENT
DESCRIPTION/PROJECT
NEEDS
CODE
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
Total
All Years
17.8
02 SERVICE VEHICLES
01
NR
17.8
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
02
NR
0.0
7.9
0.0
0.0
0.0
7.9
03
NR
0.0
0.0
10.0
0.0
0.0
10.0
04
NR
0.0
0.0
0.0
9.1
0.0
9.1
05
NR
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
4.0
4.0
06
SGR
1.2
12.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
13.4
07
NR
1.8
0.0
22.9
0.0
0.0
24.6
08
NR
2.0
0.0
26.5
0.0
0.0
28.5
10
SI
4.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
4.5
11
Purchase Locomotives **
SGR
2.2
0.0
100.3
0.0
0.0
102.5
$29.5
$20.1
$159.7
$9.1
$4.0
$222.3
$29.5
$20.1
$159.7
$9.1
$4.0
$222.3
Element Total 02
Category Total 713
196
MISC./EMERGENCY
T - 716
Commitments
($ in millions)
ELEMENT
DESCRIPTION/PROJECT
NEEDS
CODE
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
Total
All Years
02 MISCELLANEOUS
01
0.0
1.6
1.6
1.6
1.6
6.4
02
5.0
0.0
5.0
0.0
5.0
15.0
03
5.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
5.0
04
0.0
5.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
5.0
05
0.0
0.0
5.0
0.0
0.0
5.0
06
0.0
0.0
0.0
5.0
0.0
5.0
07
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
5.0
5.0
$10.0
$6.6
$11.6
$6.6
$11.6
$46.4
3.6
Element Total 02
NR
3.6
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
02
SI
5.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
5.0
03
NR
1.4
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.4
04
NR
0.6
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.6
05
NR
1.4
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.4
06
SI
0.0
1.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.2
08
Element Total 04
0.0
20.5
0.0
20.5
0.0
41.0
$12.0
$21.7
$0.0
$20.5
$0.0
$54.2
05 ENGINEERING SERVICES
01
Scope Development
0.0
12.5
12.5
12.5
12.5
50.0
02
Design Reserve
0.0
0.0
45.0
50.0
0.0
95.0
03
Engineering Services
2.3
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
20.3
04
1.5
3.0
0.0
3.0
3.0
10.5
05
9.0
9.0
9.0
9.0
9.0
45.0
06
2.6
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
2.6
07
1.5
7.0
6.7
6.9
7.1
29.1
08
0.0
6.5
0.0
6.5
0.0
13.0
09
0.0
0.0
1.6
0.0
0.0
1.6
10
NR
0.0
0.0
1.9
0.0
0.0
1.9
11
NR
0.0
0.0
2.3
0.0
0.0
2.3
12
Test Pits
NR
0.0
0.0
12.4
0.0
0.0
12.4
13
NR
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.0
0.0
1.0
15
SI
0.0
0.0
5.0
0.0
0.0
5.0
16
SI
0.0
25.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
175.0
$16.9
$67.5
$151.0
$143.3
$86.1
$464.7
Element Total 05
197
MISC./EMERGENCY
T - 716
Commitments
($ in millions)
ELEMENT
DESCRIPTION/PROJECT
NEEDS
CODE
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
Total
All Years
26.3
NR
1.5
0.0
24.8
0.0
0.0
02
NR
0.0
0.0
11.0
0.0
0.0
11.0
03
Asbestos Abatement
NR
0.0
0.0
12.0
0.0
0.0
12.0
04
Asbestos Disposal
NR
0.0
0.0
1.1
0.0
0.0
1.1
05
NR
6.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
6.5
06
NR
0.0
0.0
0.0
11.5
0.0
11.5
NR
07
Element Total 06
0.0
0.0
0.0
8.1
0.0
8.1
$8.0
$0.0
$48.8
$19.6
$0.0
$76.4
07 EMPLOYEE FACILITIES
01
SGR
2.4
0.0
25.4
0.0
0.0
27.9
02
SI
2.0
0.0
18.0
0.0
0.0
20.0
03
SGR
1.4
13.9
0.0
0.0
0.0
15.3
04
SGR
0.0
9.7
0.0
0.0
0.0
9.7
05
SGR
0.0
4.9
0.0
0.0
0.0
4.9
06
SGR
0.4
3.7
0.0
0.0
0.0
4.1
07
SGR
0.5
4.6
0.0
0.0
0.0
5.1
08
SGR
0.2
0.0
2.4
0.0
0.0
2.7
14
NR
2.5
0.0
53.4
0.0
0.0
56.0
15
SI
0.0
25.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
25.0
16
NR
31.7
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
31.7
17
NR
0.0
0.0
5.2
0.0
0.0
5.2
18
NR
0.0
0.0
3.3
0.0
5.0
8.3
21
SGR
0.1
0.9
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.0
22
SGR
0.2
1.4
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.5
Element Total 07
Category Total 716
TOTAL PROGRAM
198
$41.4
$64.1
$107.9
$0.0
$5.0
$218.3
$88.2
$159.9
$319.2
$190.0
$102.6
$860.0
$1,029.8
$3,643.2
$4,089.6
$3,723.6
$2,976.8
$15,463.0
ELEMENT
DESCRIPTION/PROJECT
NEEDS
CODE
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
Total
All Years
231.7
01 SIR: MISCELLANEOUS
01
NR
0.0
231.7
0.0
0.0
0.0
02
SGR
0.8
0.0
8.3
0.0
0.0
9.1
03
SGR
0.0
17.4
0.0
0.0
0.0
17.4
04
NR
0.0
3.8
0.0
21.9
0.0
25.7
05
SI
2.5
23.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
25.5
06
SI
2.8
26.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
28.9
07
SI
2.5
23.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
25.5
08
SI
1.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.2
09
SGR
0.4
0.0
4.6
0.0
0.0
5.0
10
NR
5.9
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
5.9
11
SI
0.0
10.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
10.0
Element Total 01
Category Total 707
TOTAL PROGRAM
$16.0
$335.0
$12.8
$21.9
$0.0
$385.8
$16.0
$335.0
$12.8
$21.9
$0.0
$385.8
$16.0
$335.0
$12.8
$21.9
$0.0
$385.8
199
AGENCY
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
Total
All Years
TOTAL
$1,029.8
$3,643.2
$4,089.6
$3,723.6
$2,976.8
$15,463.0
TOTAL
$16.0
$335.0
$12.8
$21.9
$0.0
$385.8
$1,045.8
$3,978.3
$4,102.4
$3,745.5
$2,976.8
$15,848.8
200
ROLLING STOCK
L - 701
Commitments
($ in millions)
ELEMENT
DESCRIPTION/PROJECT
NEEDS
CODE
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
Total
All Years
01 REVENUE EQUIPMENT
ME M-9 Procurement
Element Total 01
Category Total 701
NR
0.0
22.0
265.0
213.1
0.0
500.1
$0.0
$22.0
$265.0
$213.1
$0.0
$500.1
$0.0
$22.0
$265.0
$213.1
$0.0
$500.1
201
STATIONS
L - 702
Commitments
($ in millions)
ELEMENT
DESCRIPTION/PROJECT
NEEDS
CODE
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
Total
All Years
NR
0.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
4.0
SI
0.0
5.7
0.0
0.0
0.0
5.7
NR
0.0
21.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
21.0
NR
0.0
0.0
5.0
0.0
8.0
13.0
NR
0.0
5.0
33.9
0.0
0.0
38.9
4.0
NR
0.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
NR
0.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
8.0
NR
0.0
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.3
5.0
NR
0.5
4.7
5.0
5.1
6.6
22.0
SI
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
5.0
5.0
SI
11.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
11.1
NR
0.0
2.6
19.5
0.0
0.0
22.1
SI
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
30.5
30.5
SI
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
5.0
5.0
$11.6
$44.3
$68.6
$10.4
$60.4
$195.3
Element Total 04
05 PARKING
V1 Parking Rehabilitation
NR
1.0
4.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
5.0
SI
0.0
3.0
0.0
0.0
22.0
25.0
$1.0
$7.0
$0.0
$0.0
$22.0
$30.0
Element Total 05
06 PENN STATION
VP Penn Sta Elevator/Escalator Replacement
NR
0.0
0.0
34.3
0.0
5.7
40.0
NR
1.0
4.0
18.5
0.0
0.0
23.5
SI
0.0
7.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
7.0
$1.0
$11.0
$52.8
$0.0
$5.7
$70.5
$13.6
$62.3
$121.4
$10.4
$88.1
$295.8
Element Total 06
Category Total 702
202
TRACK
L - 703
Commitments
($ in millions)
ELEMENT
DESCRIPTION/PROJECT
NEEDS
CODE
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
Total
All Years
NR
65.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
65.0
NR
0.0
60.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
60.0
NR
0.0
0.0
60.0
0.0
0.0
60.0
NR
0.0
0.0
0.0
60.0
0.0
60.0
NR
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
60.0
60.0
SI
0.0
2.0
1.5
1.5
1.5
6.5
WG Construction Equipment
NR
0.0
10.0
5.5
0.0
0.0
15.5
NR
Element Total 01
0.0
3.8
3.8
3.8
3.8
15.0
$65.0
$75.8
$70.8
$65.3
$65.3
$342.0
200.0
SI
0.0
51.0
0.0
149.0
0.0
NR
10.0
17.8
17.8
21.9
0.0
67.5
SI
0.0
78.0
0.0
0.0
172.0
250.0
$10.0
$146.8
$17.8
$170.9
$172.0
$517.5
$75.0
$222.6
$88.5
$236.2
$237.3
$859.5
Element Total 04
Category Total 703
203
LINE STRUCTURES
L - 704
Commitments
($ in millions)
ELEMENT
DESCRIPTION/PROJECT
NEEDS
CODE
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
Total
All Years
01 BRIDGES
BQ Bridge Program - Structural Renewals
SGR
0.0
47.2
18.8
0.0
0.0
66.0
SGR
0.0
20.3
12.0
15.5
0.0
47.8
SGR
0.0
5.4
5.4
5.4
5.4
21.4
SGR
5.7
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
5.7
SGR
0.0
7.2
4.4
5.4
6.0
23.0
Element Total 01
Category Total 704
204
$5.7
$80.0
$40.6
$26.3
$11.3
$163.9
$5.7
$80.0
$40.6
$26.3
$11.3
$163.9
ELEMENT
DESCRIPTION/PROJECT
NEEDS
CODE
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
Total
All Years
35.2
01 COMMUNICATIONS IMPROVEMENTS
SD Fiber Optic Network
NR
0.0
8.8
8.8
8.8
8.8
NR
0.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
8.0
SI
0.0
0.0
4.8
0.0
0.0
4.8
SJ
5.0
NR
0.0
2.0
3.0
0.0
0.0
NR
0.0
0.0
1.1
0.0
0.0
1.1
SI
0.0
1.5
1.6
0.0
0.0
3.1
SI
Element Total 01
0.0
1.9
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.9
$0.0
$16.2
$21.3
$10.8
$10.8
$59.1
51.9
02 SIGNAL IMPROVEMENTS
LH Babylon Interlocking Renewal **
NR
0.0
5.2
0.0
28.0
18.7
LJ
NR
0.0
12.5
12.5
12.5
12.5
50.0
SI
0.0
126.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
126.0
LL
29.4
SI
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
29.4
NR
0.0
0.0
0.0
5.0
0.0
5.0
LN Babylon to Patchogue **
NR
0.0
10.0
33.6
0.0
0.0
43.6
LP Lightning Protection
SI
0.0
5.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
5.0
SI
0.0
0.0
10.0
0.0
10.0
20.0
Element Total 02
Category Total 705
$0.0
$158.7
$56.1
$45.5
$70.6
$330.9
$0.0
$174.9
$77.4
$56.3
$81.4
$390.0
205
ELEMENT
DESCRIPTION/PROJECT
NEEDS
CODE
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
Total
All Years
NR
0.0
0.0
108.3
0.0
0.0
108.3
NR
10.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
10.0
YR Yard Improvements
SI
0.0
40.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
40.0
SI
Element Total 01
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
8.0
8.0
$10.0
$40.0
$108.3
$0.0
$8.0
$166.3
23.0
04 EMPLOYEE FACILITIES
YJ
NR
0.0
5.1
7.1
6.4
4.4
NR
0.0
2.0
2.0
0.0
0.0
4.0
NR
0.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
8.0
NR
Element Total 04
Category Total 706
206
0.0
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.5
10.0
$0.0
$11.6
$13.6
$10.9
$8.9
$45.0
$10.0
$51.6
$121.9
$10.9
$16.9
$211.3
POWER
L - 707
Commitments
($ in millions)
ELEMENT
DESCRIPTION/PROJECT
NEEDS
CODE
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
Total
All Years
01 POWER
XA Substation Replacements
NR
0.0
4.3
42.2
17.0
17.5
81.0
XB Substation Components
NR
0.0
18.6
0.0
26.6
7.8
53.0
NR
0.0
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.8
3.0
NR
0.0
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
2.0
NR
0.0
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.8
11.0
NR
0.0
3.8
3.8
3.8
3.8
15.0
NR
0.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
4.0
NR
0.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
4.0
XJ
1.0
NR
0.0
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
NR
0.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
8.0
NR
0.0
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
2.0
NR
0.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
4.0
NR
0.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
4.0
NR
0.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
12.0
NR
0.0
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
2.0
XR New Substations
SI
0.0
0.0
0.0
5.0
0.0
5.0
XS Substation Renewals
NR
0.0
27.4
0.0
0.0
11.2
38.6
$0.0
$68.2
$60.2
$66.6
$54.6
$249.6
$0.0
$68.2
$60.2
$66.6
$54.6
$249.6
Element Total 01
Category Total 707
207
MISCELLANEOUS
L - 709
Commitments
($ in millions)
ELEMENT
DESCRIPTION/PROJECT
NEEDS
CODE
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
Total
All Years
04 MISCELLANEOUS
N5 20 Substations Chlordane Remediation - Ph 2
0.0
0.0
10.0
0.0
0.0
10.0
NJ Program Development
0.0
1.5
2.0
2.0
2.0
7.5
NK Insurance
1.6
1.6
1.6
1.6
1.6
8.0
NL Independent Engineer
1.4
1.4
1.5
1.5
1.6
7.4
2.5
1.7
1.6
1.6
1.6
9.0
22.0
22.5
23.0
23.5
24.0
115.0
0.0
8.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
8.0
$27.5
$36.7
$39.7
$30.2
$30.8
$164.9
$27.5
$36.7
$39.7
$30.2
$30.8
$164.9
$131.8
$718.3
$814.7
$650.0
$520.3
$2,835.1
NQ Program Administration
NR EAM Reserve
Element Total 04
Category Total 709
TOTAL PROGRAM
208
NR
Metro-North Railroad
ROLLING STOCK
M - 701
Commitments
($ in millions)
ELEMENT
DESCRIPTION/PROJECT
NEEDS
CODE
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
Total
All Years
01 REVENUE EQUIPMENT
01
M-3 Replacement
Element Total 01
Category Total 701
NR
0.0
206.7
324.9
0.0
0.0
531.6
$0.0
$206.7
$324.9
$0.0
$0.0
$531.6
$0.0
$206.7
$324.9
$0.0
$0.0
$531.6
209
Metro-North Railroad
STATIONS
M - 702
Commitments
($ in millions)
ELEMENT
DESCRIPTION/PROJECT
NEEDS
CODE
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
Total
All Years
138.7
SGR
0.0
19.5
10.0
27.9
81.3
02
NR
0.0
1.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.0
03
SGR
0.0
0.0
1.2
0.0
0.0
1.2
04
NR
0.0
0.0
11.4
0.0
0.0
11.4
05
GCT Utilities
NR
0.0
0.0
5.0
0.0
0.0
5.0
06
NR
0.0
0.0
1.0
0.0
6.2
7.2
07
NR
0.0
37.5
7.5
0.0
0.0
45.0
Mentoring - GCT
NR
08
Element Total 01
0.0
2.0
3.0
0.0
0.0
5.0
$0.0
$60.0
$39.1
$27.9
$87.6
$214.6
02 OUTLYING STATIONS
01
NR
2.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
2.0
02
NR
0.0
0.0
30.6
0.0
0.0
30.6
03
NR
2.5
0.0
15.0
0.0
0.0
17.5
04
NR
2.5
0.0
20.0
0.0
0.0
22.5
05
NR
0.0
0.0
0.3
1.2
0.0
1.5
06
NR
0.0
0.1
0.4
0.0
0.0
0.5
07
Customer Communication
SI
0.0
45.0
15.0
0.0
0.0
60.0
08
SI
0.0
0.0
5.0
0.0
0.0
5.0
09
NR
0.0
3.0
10.0
2.0
0.0
15.0
$7.0
$48.1
$96.2
$3.2
$0.0
$154.6
19.7
Element Total 02
03 PARKING
01
Strategic Facilities **
SI
0.0
2.5
6.5
2.0
8.7
02
SI
0.0
0.0
1.0
0.0
2.0
3.0
$0.0
$2.5
$7.5
$2.0
$10.7
$22.7
$7.0
$110.6
$142.9
$33.1
$98.3
$391.9
Element Total 03
Category Total 702
210
Metro-North Railroad
ELEMENT
DESCRIPTION/PROJECT
NEEDS
CODE
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
Total
All Years
97.0
01 TRACK
01
NR
0.0
22.0
24.0
25.0
26.0
02
NR
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
2.0
03
NR
0.0
13.2
0.0
0.0
6.5
19.7
04
NR
9.4
10.7
10.6
14.6
6.2
51.5
05
NR
3.1
4.5
4.6
4.7
8.0
24.9
06
Turnouts - Yards/Sidings
NR
0.0
1.4
1.9
0.0
1.9
5.2
07
NR
0.0
2.1
0.0
5.4
0.0
7.5
08
Systemwide Drainage
NR
0.0
10.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
10.0
09
NR
0.0
12.0
5.4
2.2
2.4
22.0
$12.9
$76.3
$46.9
$52.3
$51.4
$239.8
40.0
Element Total 01
02 STRUCTURES
01
SGR
0.0
14.0
4.1
21.9
0.0
02
SGR
0.0
0.0
1.8
0.0
0.0
1.8
03
SGR
0.0
13.0
18.4
17.9
20.3
69.7
04
SGR
0.0
0.0
5.0
2.5
0.0
7.5
2.5
05
SGR
0.0
0.0
1.3
0.0
1.3
06
Railtop Culverts
SGR
2.1
1.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
3.4
07
Bridge Walkways
NR
1.0
0.7
0.3
0.0
0.0
2.0
08
SGR
2.5
1.3
1.2
0.0
0.0
5.0
09
NR
1.0
0.0
9.0
0.0
0.0
10.0
10
SGR
0.0
0.0
2.0
0.0
0.0
2.0
11
ROW Fencing
SGR
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
1.0
12
Catenary Painting
SGR
0.0
0.0
1.6
0.0
3.5
5.0
13
NR
0.0
1.2
1.2
1.3
1.3
5.0
14
NR
0.0
0.0
3.0
0.0
0.0
3.0
15
NR
0.0
0.0
3.0
0.0
0.0
3.0
$6.8
$31.7
$52.0
$43.8
$26.5
$160.8
Element Total 02
NR
0.0
15.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
15.0
02
SGR
5.6
0.9
3.5
0.0
0.0
10.0
03
SGR
0.0
0.0
6.9
8.1
0.0
15.0
04
SGR
0.0
0.0
14.0
0.0
0.0
14.0
05
SGR
Element Total 03
Category Total 703
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
3.5
$6.3
$16.6
$25.1
$8.8
$0.7
$57.5
$26.0
$124.5
$123.9
$104.9
$78.6
$458.0
211
Metro-North Railroad
ELEMENT
DESCRIPTION/PROJECT
NEEDS
CODE
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
Total
All Years
NR
0.0
17.0
10.0
4.5
0.0
31.5
02
NR
0.0
40.0
0.0
0.0
20.0
60.0
03
SI
0.0
54.0
37.9
1.9
0.0
93.8
04
NR
0.0
3.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
3.5
05
PBX Replacement
NR
0.0
1.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.5
06
NR
0.0
1.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.5
07
NR
0.0
1.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.0
NR
09
Element Total 01
Category Total 704
212
0.0
0.0
0.8
0.0
0.0
0.8
$0.0
$118.5
$48.7
$6.4
$20.0
$193.6
$0.0
$118.5
$48.7
$6.4
$20.0
$193.6
Metro-North Railroad
POWER
M - 705
Commitments
($ in millions)
ELEMENT
DESCRIPTION/PROJECT
NEEDS
CODE
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
Total
All Years
01 POWER
01
NR
0.0
2.0
10.0
0.0
0.0
12.0
02
Transformer Rehabilitation
NR
2.2
0.7
0.7
0.7
1.0
5.2
03
NR
1.4
1.5
0.7
0.2
0.0
3.9
04
NR
15.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
15.0
05
NR
0.0
0.0
11.0
0.0
0.0
11.0
06
NR
0.0
0.0
3.0
0.0
22.5
25.5
07
NR
0.0
10.0
5.0
5.0
0.0
20.0
08
NR
0.0
0.0
0.4
0.0
0.0
0.4
09
NR
0.0
0.0
2.8
0.0
0.0
2.8
10
NR
0.0
1.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.5
11
NR
0.0
0.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.5
12
Mentoring - Power
NR
0.0
3.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
3.0
Element Total 01
Category Total 705
$18.6
$19.2
$33.6
$5.9
$23.5
$100.8
$18.6
$19.2
$33.6
$5.9
$23.5
$100.8
213
Metro-North Railroad
ELEMENT
DESCRIPTION/PROJECT
NEEDS
CODE
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
Total
All Years
SGR
0.0
0.0
0.0
385.6
46.0
431.6
02
NR
0.0
0.0
2.0
0.0
0.0
2.0
03
SI
0.0
0.0
4.2
0.0
0.0
4.2
04
SI
0.0
9.2
8.0
7.0
0.0
24.2
05
SGR
0.0
0.0
10.0
0.0
0.0
10.0
Element Total 01
Category Total 706
214
$0.0
$9.2
$24.2
$392.6
$46.0
$472.0
$0.0
$9.2
$24.2
$392.6
$46.0
$472.0
Metro-North Railroad
MISCELLANEOUS
M - 708
Commitments
($ in millions)
ELEMENT
DESCRIPTION/PROJECT
NEEDS
CODE
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
Total
All Years
01 MISCELLANEOUS
01
NR
0.2
0.8
4.0
0.0
0.0
5.0
02
Environmental Remediation
NR
0.3
0.0
2.3
0.0
0.0
2.5
03
0.9
0.9
0.9
0.9
0.9
4.5
04
Independent Engineer
3.1
0.0
4.9
0.0
0.0
8.0
05
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
7.1
10.0
11.0
11.0
11.0
11.0
54.0
3.0
3.6
4.2
3.6
3.6
18.0
15.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
14.0
29.0
06
Program Administration
07
08
OCIP - Insurance
09
SI
12.9
0.0
0.0
2.2
0.0
15.1
10
SI
0.0
7.9
9.0
0.0
0.0
16.9
11
EAM Reserve
0.0
4.0
4.0
5.0
0.0
13.0
Element Total 01
Category Total 708
TOTAL PROGRAM
$46.8
$29.6
$41.6
$24.1
$30.9
$173.1
$46.8
$29.6
$41.6
$24.1
$30.9
$173.1
$98.4
$618.4
$739.7
$567.1
$297.3
$2,321.0
215
AGENCY
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
Total
All Years
TOTAL
$131.8
$718.3
$814.7
$650.0
$520.3
$2,835.1
TOTAL
Metro-North Railroad
$98.4
$618.4
$739.7
$567.1
$297.3
$2,321.0
$230.3
$1,336.7
$1,554.4
$1,217.1
$817.6
$5,156.1
216
ELEMENT
DESCRIPTION/PROJECT
NEEDS
CODE
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
Total
All Years
NR
0.0
0.0
48.1
0.0
0.0
48.1
02
NR
0.0
0.0
196.1
0.0
0.0
196.1
04
SI
0.0
5.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
5.2
05
SI
0.0
12.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
12.0
06
SI
0.0
0.0
0.0
6.0
0.0
6.0
07
SGR
10.8
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
10.8
08
NR
0.0
8.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
8.2
09
SGR
0.0
9.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
9.5
10
NR
0.0
0.0
0.0
4.9
0.0
4.9
11
NR
34.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
34.5
12
Environmental Remediation **
NR
0.0
4.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
4.5
13
NR
0.0
0.0
2.5
0.0
0.0
2.5
14
NR
0.0
0.0
3.6
0.0
0.0
3.6
15
Project Administration
1.5
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
13.5
16
0.8
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
6.8
17
0.8
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
6.8
18
0.0
0.0
0.0
3.0
0.0
3.0
$48.3
$45.5
$256.2
$19.9
$6.0
$376.0
$48.3
$45.5
$256.2
$19.9
$6.0
$376.0
$48.3
$45.5
$256.2
$19.9
$6.0
$376.0
Element Total 02
Category Total 703
TOTAL PROGRAM
NR
217
MTA Interagency
ELEMENT
DESCRIPTION/PROJECT
NEEDS
CODE
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
Total
All Years
28.5
SI
0.0
28.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
02
Poughkeepsie Facility
NR
0.0
0.0
2.0
0.0
0.0
2.0
03
Other Facilities
NR
0.0
0.0
2.3
0.0
0.0
2.3
04
REP-ESU Fleet
NR
0.0
0.0
0.7
0.0
0.0
0.7
05
Program Management
NR
0.0
1.0
1.0
1.5
1.5
5.0
Element Total 01
Category Total 710
218
$0.0
$29.5
$6.0
$1.5
$1.5
$38.5
$0.0
$29.5
$6.0
$1.5
$1.5
$38.5
MTA Interagency
MTA PLANNING
N - 711
Commitments
($ in millions)
ELEMENT
DESCRIPTION/PROJECT
NEEDS
CODE
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
Total
All Years
SI
0.0
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.5
10.0
02
SI
0.0
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.5
10.0
03
SI
0.0
20.0
35.0
35.0
35.0
125.0
SI
04
Element Total 01
Category Total 711
TOTAL PROGRAM
0.0
20.0
20.0
20.0
20.0
80.0
$0.0
$45.0
$60.0
$60.0
$60.0
$225.0
$0.0
$45.0
$60.0
$60.0
$60.0
$225.0
$0.0
$74.5
$66.0
$61.5
$61.5
$263.5
219
AGENCY
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
Total
All Years
TOTAL
$0.0
$29.5
$6.0
$1.5
$1.5
$38.5
TOTAL
MTA PLANNING
$0.0
$45.0
$60.0
$60.0
$60.0
$225.0
$0.0
$74.5
$66.0
$61.5
$61.5
$263.5
220
Commitments
($ in millions)
ELEMENT
DESCRIPTION/PROJECT
NEEDS
CODE
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
Total
All Years
Program Management
NE
10.4
9.7
7.5
4.9
0.0
32.6
02
Design - GEC
NE
18.0
10.5
6.5
3.2
0.8
39.0
03
MTA Management
NE
12.0
9.9
9.3
12.6
0.0
43.9
05
NE
0.0
10.9
8.1
0.0
0.0
19.0
11
OCIP
NE
20.9
76.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
97.1
13
Construction Management
NE
47.9
51.3
38.3
20.4
0.0
157.9
15
NE
0.0
0.0
5.6
0.0
0.0
5.6
16
General Conditions
NE
11.1
9.2
8.8
7.4
0.0
36.5
18
NE
0.0
19.6
21.9
15.5
8.5
65.5
21
NE
266.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
266.0
23
NE
0.0
26.6
1.3
0.0
0.0
27.9
24
EBRR
NE
0.0
0.0
77.3
2.3
1.0
80.5
27
NE
0.0
0.8
6.2
8.9
9.6
25.4
28
Rolling Stock
NE
194.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
194.5
32
Management Reserve
NE
0.0
20.3
20.8
0.0
75.0
116.0
34
Protect Locomotives
NE
7.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
7.5
35
NE
225.2
0.0
13.3
0.0
0.0
238.5
36
NE
37.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
37.5
38
NE
0.0
2.9
1.3
0.5
0.0
4.7
39
Utilities
NE
7.0
10.3
6.3
5.4
6.3
35.3
40
NE
5.4
10.4
7.2
1.4
0.0
24.4
41
NE
42.9
4.7
0.0
0.0
0.0
47.6
42
GCT Caverns
NE
777.4
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
777.4
44
NE
0.0
1.7
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.7
45
NE
0.0
16.8
0.0
0.0
0.0
16.8
46
NE
0.0
5.0
10.0
5.0
0.0
20.0
47
NE
1.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.0
49
Material Warranties
NE
7.2
7.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
14.3
50
NE
0.0
0.0
0.0
3.6
0.0
3.6
51
Test Trains
NE
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.8
0.0
1.8
52
NE
0.0
2.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
2.2
53
NE
0.0
0.0
35.0
0.0
29.0
64.0
54
Cab Simulator
NE
0.0
4.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
4.3
55
Program Contingency
NE
21.5
25.0
15.0
0.0
0.0
61.5
$1,713.3
$335.5
$299.8
$92.9
$130.2
$2,571.7
$1,713.3
$335.5
$299.8
$92.9
$130.2
$2,571.7
Element Total 01
Category Total 709
221
Commitments
($ in millions)
ELEMENT
DESCRIPTION/PROJECT
NEEDS
CODE
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
Total
All Years
NE
0.0
135.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
135.0
04
NE
0.0
0.0
0.0
50.0
0.0
50.0
05
NE
0.0
20.0
0.0
20.0
0.0
40.0
07
NE
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
270.0
270.0
98
NE
0.0
0.0
40.0
0.0
0.0
40.0
$0.0
$155.0
$40.0
$70.0
$270.0
$535.0
$0.0
$155.0
$40.0
$70.0
$270.0
$535.0
Element Total 01
Category Total 710
222
Commitments
($ in millions)
ELEMENT
DESCRIPTION/PROJECT
NEEDS
CODE
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
Total
All Years
31.1
Design
NE
0.0
31.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
02
Program Management
NE
0.0
9.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
9.3
03
Construction Management
NE
0.0
0.0
0.0
16.1
15.0
31.1
04
NE
0.0
0.0
0.0
237.6
0.0
237.6
05
NE
0.0
0.0
0.0
56.3
0.0
56.3
06
Power **
NE
0.0
0.0
0.0
106.2
0.0
106.2
07
Stations
NE
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
188.0
188.0
08
NE
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
30.6
30.6
09
NE
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
4.9
4.9
$0.0
$40.4
$0.0
$416.2
$238.5
$695.0
$0.0
$40.4
$0.0
$416.2
$238.5
$695.0
Element Total 01
Category Total 711
223
REGIONAL INVESTMENTS
G - 714
Commitments
($ in millions)
ELEMENT
DESCRIPTION/PROJECT
NEEDS
CODE
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
Total
All Years
01 REGIONAL INVESTMENTS
01
NE
0.0
0.0
0.0
12.2
5.9
18.1
02
NE
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
148.8
148.8
04
NE
0.0
0.0
0.0
3.9
3.9
7.9
07
NE
0.0
0.0
0.8
0.0
0.0
0.8
12
Sunnyside Station
NE
0.0
0.0
10.0
0.0
66.5
76.5
NE
13
Element Total 01
Category Total 714
224
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
57.8
57.8
$0.0
$0.0
$10.8
$16.2
$282.8
$309.8
$0.0
$0.0
$10.8
$16.2
$282.8
$309.8
Commitments
($ in millions)
ELEMENT
DESCRIPTION/PROJECT
NEEDS
CODE
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
Total
All Years
NE
0.0
78.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
78.1
02
NE
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
131.0
131.0
Element Total 01
Category Total 715
$0.0
$78.1
$0.0
$0.0
$131.0
$209.1
$0.0
$78.1
$0.0
$0.0
$131.0
$209.1
225
MISCELLANEOUS
G - 716
Commitments
($ in millions)
ELEMENT
DESCRIPTION/PROJECT
NEEDS
CODE
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
Total
All Years
01 MISCELLANEOUS
01
0.0
27.9
27.9
27.9
27.9
111.6
02
0.0
4.2
4.2
4.2
4.2
16.8
03
0.0
1.6
1.6
1.6
1.6
6.5
Element Total 01
Category Total 716
TOTAL PROGRAM
226
$0.0
$33.7
$33.7
$33.7
$33.7
$135.0
$0.0
$33.7
$33.7
$33.7
$33.7
$135.0
$1,713.3
$642.7
$384.4
$629.0
$1,086.2
$4,455.6
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
Total
All Years
$1,045.8
$3,978.3
$4,102.4
$3,745.5
$2,976.8
$15,848.8
$131.8
$718.3
$814.7
$650.0
$520.3
$2,835.1
$98.4
$618.4
$739.7
$567.1
$297.3
$2,321.0
$48.3
$45.5
$256.2
$19.9
$6.0
$376.0
$0.0
$74.5
$66.0
$61.5
$61.5
$263.5
Core Subtotal
$1,324.5
$5,435.0
$5,979.0
$5,044.0
$3,861.9
$21,644.4
$1,713.3
$642.7
$384.4
$629.0
$1,086.2
$4,455.6
$3,037.8
$6,077.7
$6,363.4
$5,672.9
$4,948.1
$26,100.0
AGENCY
227
STRUCTURES
D - 701
Commitments
($ in millions)
ELEMENT
DESCRIPTION/PROJECT
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
Total
All Years
NR
0.0
0.0
4.6
0.0
10.5
15.1
SI
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
7.0
7.0
$0.0
$0.0
$4.6
$0.1
$17.5
$22.1
NEEDS
CODE
AW AGENCY-WIDE
98
Element Total AW
BW BRONX-WHITESTONE BRIDGE
07
NR
0.0
1.6
0.0
19.1
0.0
20.7
14
NR
29.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
29.3
NR
84
Element Total BW
20.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
20.2
$49.5
$1.6
$0.0
$19.1
$0.0
$70.1
48.9
NR
0.1
1.6
0.0
47.2
0.0
24
0.0
0.0
0.0
6.6
0.0
6.6
$0.1
$1.6
$0.0
$53.9
$0.0
$55.6
Element Total CB
NR
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
4.5
4.6
48
NR
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
3.5
3.5
$0.0
$0.0
$0.0
$0.1
$8.0
$8.1
23.7
Element Total HC
Structural Rehabilitation
NR
0.1
1.7
0.0
2.2
19.7
89
Skewback Retrofit
NR
0.0
83.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
83.2
$0.1
$84.9
$0.0
$2.2
$19.7
$106.9
6.7
Element Total HH
NR
0.1
6.7
0.0
0.0
0.0
40
NR
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
4.5
4.6
$0.1
$6.7
$0.0
$0.0
$4.5
$11.3
Element Total QM
NR
1.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.5
19
NR
0.1
5.1
0.0
11.3
51.8
68.2
20
NR
0.0
0.9
2.2
1.9
11.3
16.3
22
NR
0.0
0.0
25.9
0.0
0.0
25.9
70
NR
0.1
4.7
0.0
7.4
81.6
93.8
$1.6
$10.7
$28.1
$20.6
$144.7
$205.7
Element Total RK
228
STRUCTURES
D - 701
Commitments
($ in millions)
ELEMENT
DESCRIPTION/PROJECT
NEEDS
CODE
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
Total
All Years
NR
10.3
0.0
13.0
139.1
0.0
162.5
87
NR
0.0
2.1
11.2
0.0
0.0
13.2
$10.3
$2.1
$24.2
$139.1
$0.0
$175.7
Element Total TN
VN VERRAZANO-NARROWS BRIDGE
10
NR
4.3
0.0
44.9
0.0
0.0
49.2
32
NR
0.0
0.0
0.5
1.8
31.6
33.8
34
NR
0.0
0.0
43.1
0.0
0.0
43.1
89
NR
0.8
0.0
2.8
18.1
0.0
21.6
$5.0
$0.0
$91.2
$19.9
$31.6
$147.7
$66.6
$107.5
$148.1
$255.0
$226.0
$803.2
Element Total VN
Category Total 701
229
ELEMENT
DESCRIPTION/PROJECT
NEEDS
CODE
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
Total
All Years
AW AGENCY-WIDE
X1 Agency Wide: Planning/Strategic Initiatives
SI
Element Total AW
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
50.8
50.8
$0.0
$0.0
$0.0
$0.0
$50.8
$50.8
SI
0.0
26.4
0.5
0.0
114.4
141.3
65
NR
0.0
0.1
12.5
0.0
211.5
224.1
$0.0
$26.4
$13.0
$0.0
$325.9
$365.3
Element Total RK
NR
0.0
0.0
310.4
0.0
0.0
310.4
55
NR
0.0
16.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
16.2
$0.0
$16.2
$310.4
$0.0
$0.0
$326.6
2.0
0.0
28.6
0.0
31.2
Element Total TN
VN VERRAZANO-NARROWS BRIDGE
11
NR
0.6
80
NR
0.0
0.0
0.1
8.6
0.0
8.7
84
NR
4.1
12.5
0.0
0.0
269.5
286.0
NR
86
Element Total VN
Category Total 702
230
0.0
0.1
4.2
0.0
0.4
4.6
$4.6
$14.6
$4.3
$37.2
$269.8
$330.5
$4.6
$57.2
$327.6
$37.2
$646.5
$1,073.2
ELEMENT
DESCRIPTION/PROJECT
NEEDS
CODE
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
Total
All Years
AW AGENCY-WIDE
32
NR
13.6
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
13.6
36
SI
0.0
0.0
1.2
0.0
9.5
10.7
52
SI
0.0
0.0
3.2
0.0
0.0
3.2
57
SI
0.0
0.4
0.0
7.7
0.0
8.1
63
NR
0.0
8.5
0.0
12.8
0.0
21.3
NR
65
Element Total AW
3.7
0.0
48.2
0.0
15.6
67.5
$17.3
$8.9
$52.6
$20.4
$25.0
$124.3
Element Total HH
Category Total 703
NR
0.0
81.7
0.0
0.0
0.0
81.7
$0.0
$81.7
$0.0
$0.0
$0.0
$81.7
$17.3
$90.6
$52.6
$20.4
$25.0
$206.0
231
UTILITIES
D - 704
Commitments
($ in millions)
ELEMENT
DESCRIPTION/PROJECT
NEEDS
CODE
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
Total
All Years
AW AGENCY-WIDE
73
NR
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
2.3
2.3
80
SI
0.0
0.8
10.8
1.3
0.0
12.9
NR
0.0
0.0
3.7
4.7
11.6
20.0
$0.0
$0.8
$14.6
$6.0
$13.8
$35.2
0.1
0.3
0.0
6.9
0.0
7.3
Element Total AW
BW BRONX-WHITESTONE BRIDGE
32
39
NR
SI
Element Total BW
0.1
31.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
31.1
$0.1
$31.3
$0.0
$6.9
$0.0
$38.3
NR
0.0
0.1
0.8
84.7
0.0
85.5
30
NR
0.0
0.3
1.2
9.1
0.0
10.6
64
NR
0.0
0.3
1.5
5.5
0.0
7.3
$0.0
$0.6
$3.5
$99.3
$0.0
$103.4
18.7
Element Total HC
NR
1.4
17.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
19
NR
0.0
0.4
1.3
1.5
12.1
15.3
$1.4
$17.7
$1.3
$1.5
$12.1
$34.0
42.2
Element Total HH
NR
0.0
0.0
0.0
42.2
0.0
91
NR
0.0
0.3
1.0
5.8
0.0
7.0
$0.0
$0.3
$1.0
$48.0
$0.0
$49.2
Element Total QM
NR
0.1
0.3
15.3
0.0
0.0
15.6
21
NR
1.1
22.8
0.0
0.0
0.0
23.8
60
SI
0.0
35.4
0.0
0.0
0.0
35.4
66
NR
0.0
0.0
0.0
19.2
0.0
19.2
$1.1
$58.4
$15.3
$19.2
$0.0
$94.0
Element Total RK
NR
0.0
0.0
0.6
0.0
2.2
2.8
60
Anchorage Dehumidification
NR
39.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
39.1
$39.1
$0.0
$0.6
$0.0
$2.2
$41.8
Element Total TN
232
UTILITIES
D - 704
Commitments
($ in millions)
ELEMENT
DESCRIPTION/PROJECT
NEEDS
CODE
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
Total
All Years
VN VERRAZANO-NARROWS BRIDGE
30
Elevator Rehabilitation
Element Total VN
Category Total 704
NR
0.0
0.7
1.5
0.0
7.6
9.8
$0.0
$0.7
$1.5
$0.0
$7.6
$9.8
$41.7
$109.8
$37.7
$180.9
$35.8
$405.8
233
ELEMENT
DESCRIPTION/PROJECT
NEEDS
CODE
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
Total
All Years
AW AGENCY-WIDE
12
NR
0.0
1.5
9.2
0.0
0.0
10.7
66
NR
0.0
0.1
0.1
25.4
0.0
25.5
$0.0
$1.6
$9.3
$25.4
$0.0
$36.2
0.0
1.1
3.7
0.0
0.0
4.7
$0.0
$1.1
$3.7
$0.0
$0.0
$4.7
0.0
0.8
2.4
0.0
0.0
3.2
$0.0
$0.8
$2.4
$0.0
$0.0
$3.2
0.1
2.8
0.0
33.4
13.9
50.2
Element Total AW
NR
Element Total HC
NR
Element Total QM
Element Total RK
Category Total 705
234
NR
$0.1
$2.8
$0.0
$33.4
$13.9
$50.2
$0.1
$6.2
$15.3
$58.8
$13.9
$94.3
MISCELLANEOUS
D - 706
Commitments
($ in millions)
ELEMENT
DESCRIPTION/PROJECT
NEEDS
CODE
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
Total
All Years
4.0
AW AGENCY-WIDE
10
0.0
4.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
15
0.0
1.4
0.0
0.0
1.1
2.5
18
0.0
2.5
2.5
2.5
5.6
13.1
21
Program Administration
4.7
4.7
4.7
4.7
5.2
24.0
22
Miscellaneous
0.1
3.5
2.6
0.0
0.0
6.1
28
Scope Development
0.0
6.7
1.6
1.6
2.5
12.5
85
0.0
7.8
0.0
0.0
0.0
7.8
94
0.0
15.6
0.0
0.0
0.0
15.6
$4.8
$46.2
$11.4
$8.8
$14.4
$85.6
$4.8
$46.2
$11.4
$8.8
$14.4
$85.6
Element Total AW
Category Total 706
SI
235
STRUCTURAL PAINTING
D - 707
Commitments
($ in millions)
ELEMENT
DESCRIPTION/PROJECT
NEEDS
CODE
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
Total
All Years
AW AGENCY-WIDE
95
NR
Element Total AW
0.0
30.4
0.0
0.0
0.0
30.4
$0.0
$30.4
$0.0
$0.0
$0.0
$30.4
28.8
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
28.8
$0.0
$0.0
$28.8
BW BRONX-WHITESTONE BRIDGE
84
NR
Element Total BW
$28.8
$0.0
$0.0
0.0
0.9
0.0
2.6
17.2
20.6
$2.6
$17.2
$20.6
NR
Element Total HH
$0.0
$0.9
$0.0
0.0
0.5
0.0
3.9
27.7
32.1
$0.5
$0.0
$3.9
$27.7
$32.1
NR
$0.0
Element Total RK
NR
0.0
0.0
26.3
0.0
0.0
26.3
60
NR
7.9
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
7.9
$7.9
$0.0
$26.3
$0.0
$0.0
$34.2
0.1
1.1
5.8
34.8
0.0
41.7
Element Total TN
VN VERRAZANO-NARROWS BRIDGE
49
Element Total VN
Category Total 707
TOTAL PROGRAM
236
NR
$0.1
$1.1
$5.8
$34.8
$0.0
$41.7
$36.8
$32.9
$32.1
$41.2
$44.9
$187.9
$171.8
$450.5
$624.8
$602.3
$1,006.5
$2,856.0
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
Total
All Years
$1,045.8
$3,978.3
$4,102.4
$3,745.5
$2,976.8
$15,848.8
$131.8
$718.3
$814.7
$650.0
$520.3
$2,835.1
$98.4
$618.4
$739.7
$567.1
$297.3
$2,321.0
$48.3
$45.5
$256.2
$19.9
$6.0
$376.0
$0.0
$74.5
$66.0
$61.5
$61.5
$263.5
Core Subtotal
$1,324.5
$5,435.0
$5,979.0
$5,044.0
$3,861.9
$21,644.4
$1,713.3
$642.7
$384.4
$629.0
$1,086.2
$4,455.6
$3,037.8
$6,077.7
$6,363.4
$5,672.9
$4,948.1
$26,100.0
$171.8
$450.5
$624.8
$602.3
$1,006.5
$2,856.0
$3,209.6
$6,528.2
$6,988.2
$6,275.3
$5,954.6
$28,955.9
AGENCY
237