Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Scribd
Upload
24 views

Week 6 Tutorial Questions

Vincent, a 17-year-old, orders 10 waistcoats from Rite Tailors for a discounted price of $1,000 total. He pays a $200 deposit and takes immediate possession of one waistcoat. However, Vincent later cancels the order and demands his deposit back, claiming the contract is invalid due to his minor status. Rite Tailors refuses, arguing Vincent received goods and they will incur losses. Vincent may argue the contract is voidable due to his minority, while Rite Tailors could counter that the contract was for necessities so it is binding. Rite Tailors delivered goods so Vincent must pay or return the waistcoat received.

Uploaded by

IsfundiyerTaunga
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
24 views

Week 6 Tutorial Questions

Vincent, a 17-year-old, orders 10 waistcoats from Rite Tailors for a discounted price of $1,000 total. He pays a $200 deposit and takes immediate possession of one waistcoat. However, Vincent later cancels the order and demands his deposit back, claiming the contract is invalid due to his minor status. Rite Tailors refuses, arguing Vincent received goods and they will incur losses. Vincent may argue the contract is voidable due to his minority, while Rite Tailors could counter that the contract was for necessities so it is binding. Rite Tailors delivered goods so Vincent must pay or return the waistcoat received.

Uploaded by

IsfundiyerTaunga
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

AF108: INTRODUCTION TO LAW FOR COMMERCE

WEEK 6: TUTORIAL QUESTIONS

Part A: Capacity to Contract


1. What types of contracts will bind a minor?
2. When will a person of unsound mind be bound by a contract?
3. Vincent is aged 17 and attends High School. His dad is the CEO of a well-known
bank called, Money Bank. Vincent has no other siblings. He has always been
pampered by his dad and gets all his wishes granted (at least all that can be bought by
money). Vincent has an aunt who has her wedding scheduled to take place in a weeks
time. Although Vincent has a wardrobe full of clothes (shirts, trousers, waistcoats,
etc) he decides that he needs to buy a waistcoat for the occasion.
Vincent visits Rite Tailors, who specialise in the sewing of waistcoats. While placing
his order, Vincent notices a flyer on the shop counter. Rite Tailors were offering a
deal under which customers could get ten waistcoats for the price of five. Rite Tailors
normally charged $200 per waistcoat. Vincent places an order for ten waistcoats in
various colours. He pays a deposit of $20 and requests that his order for a red
waistcoat be made ready within four days. Rite Tailors do get the order ready for the
red waistcoat as agreed. Vincent tells them that he will pay them as soon as the
remaining waistcoats are made ready. He also tells them that his dad is the CEO of
Money Bank and they can trust him. Rite Tailors allow Vincent to take the red
waistcoat.
Vincent wears the red waistcoat to his aunts wedding. The day after the wedding, he
decides that red is just not his colour so he takes the waistcoat back to Rite Tailors. He
tells them to cancel his order for the remaining waistcoats and that he is returning the
red waistcoat as well. He also demands his deposit back. Rite Tailors are infuriated.
They tell Vincent that he cannot just refuse to go ahead with the deal. Vincent tells
them that he is a minor and the contract is therefore invalid.
Advise both parties as to their rights and liabilities.

Part B: Genuine Consent


For the following situation decide whether there is a contract or not and the position of the
parties, bearing in mind what you have learnt so far from your readings. Consider invitations

to treat, offers, acceptances, consideration and the five grounds that would make a contract
void/voidable i.e. mistake, misrepresentation, duress, undue influence and unconscionability.
1. Mary offers her BMW for sale to Ben. She says: Ben, I offer you to buy my blue
BMW registration number DW007 for $100,000. It is a wonderful car and the
latest of its kind. It is only 6 months old.
Ben takes Marys car for a test drive and goes to Tony, a Car Dealer and Tony advises
Ben that the BMW is indeed the latest model and he is getting a great deal. Ben does
not know that Tony is Marys cousin who happens to know that Mary really wants to
sell her car. Upon Tonys advise Ben purchases the car from Mary for $100,000.
After a week when Ben takes the car to Disneyworld Automotives for servicing, he is
asked to buy some parts. At the spare parts shop he realizes that the BMW, which he
has bought is not the latest model, and that there are 3 later versions already in the
market. He then goes back to Disneyworld Automotives with the parts, and discovers
that the car is more than two years old. Ben decides to confront Mary and when he
turns up at Marys house, he overhears Tony and Marys conversation as to how they
fooled Ben and sold a BMW worth $50,000 for $100,000. Ben decides to sue Mary.
On what ground(s) if any, could Ben sue Mary?

Part C: Torts
1. In order to succeed in an action in negligence, what must a plaintiff establish?
2. Maggie is an experienced baker and owns a cake shop. She buys ingredients from
Best Supplies, a local supplier. To attract customers, Maggie also serves hot
beverages and soft drinks at her cake shop. On Fridays, Jenny and her friends meet at
the cake shop for afternoon tea. One afternoon, Jenny ordered a piece of lemon cake
and hot chocolate while her friends only settled for soft drinks. After eating half of the
piece of cake, Jenny discovered remains of a cockroach in her cake. She suffered
severe shock and gastroenteritis. For two weeks, Jenny could not eat anything
without feeling nauseated. During this time she was also unable to go to work.
Advise Jenny as to whether she would be successful in bringing an action in
negligence against Maggie.

3. Kini, a football lover, frequently attended games at his local ground. On one occasion
the football was kicked into the stand where he was sitting, hitting him on the head
and knocking him out of his seat, causing him to break his arm.
Can Kini sue either the local council or the football club, or both, in negligence for the
broken arm that he received?

You might also like