Beany Block: Kerb Drainage at Its Most Efficient
Beany Block: Kerb Drainage at Its Most Efficient
Beany Block: Kerb Drainage at Its Most Efficient
General
Beany Block was invented by Neil (Beany) Beanland,
C Eng.,M.I.C.E., M.I.H.T., Dip. T.E., a former highway
design engineer with West Yorkshire Metropolitan County
Council.
Since these units were introduced on a commercial scale in
early 1982, lengths varying between a few metres and
several kilometres have been installed in all types of
schemes, from motorway and trunk roads to estate roads
and car parks throughout the United Kingdom.
Footway/verge
Standard Beany Block top
Beany Block
Cement Mortar
Technicrete reserves the right to change or amend the contents of this document at anytime without any notice with this document intended for general information only.
Any specific information required about product specifications, applications, technical information, sales conditions, warranties and guarantees as required for any design or installation
should be obtained from Technicrete.
Technicrete House
Cnr. Main Reef Road & Houtkapper Street, Roodepoort, 1725
Tel: 011 674 6900 Fax: 011 672 1425
Email: info@technicrete.co.za
www.technicrete.co.za
0861 266267
Branches:
Carletonville: 011 372-8500
Stilfontein: 018 484-3089
Olifantsfontein: 011 203-7700
Hydraulic properties
The Technicrete Beany Block is simple yet practical and its excellent surface drainage
efficiency, together with its comparatively large flow capacity/unit weight ratio, makes
it superior to and more cost effective than conventional kerbing and drainage for many
roadway designs. Vehicle entrances can be easily accommodated using the Mountable
Beany top. This unit allows the bottom channel flow to be uninterrupted. The Beany
Block is also designed to be used in conjunction with SABS Fig. 3 & Fig. 4 Barrier
Kerbs.
Flow capacities and velocities for various channel gradients can be derived from
Hydraulic Research (Wallingford) Charts for the Hydraulic Design of Channels and Pipes.
As a quick reference, calculations have been carried out for two flow conditions:
1- Top and base blocks running full
2- Top and base blocks with base only running full
Standard
Beany Block
top
The system
Blocks of inverted channel section with an opening in one side face. When laid end to
end they form a combined kerb and surface water drainage unit strong enough to
withstand normal traffic loading. Each standard Top and Base Block is 500mm in
length and weighs approximately 85kg. The Top Block oval openings give an aesthetic
appearance and provide for greater inlet capacities than conventional kerb inlets.
Standard blocks may be used for curve radii of 30m or more. Splay blocks are
available to order for radii between 6m and 30m.
80
130
Flow velocities and capacities may also be derived from the Colebrook White equation for
open channel flow, roughness value 0.6mm and using the hydraulic constants shown in TABLE 1.
After determining the respective velocities and capacities, drainage system calculations can
be undertaken in the usual way.
Inlet apertures are shaped and positioned to give maximum drainage efficiency as well as
a pleasing appearance.
Minimum recommended self cleansing velocity 0.6m/s.
For comparison, the increased capacities over conventional pipes are approximately:
Top and base: 32% greater capacity than a 300 diameter pipe
Base : 40% greater capacity than a 225 diameter pipe
25
15
60
120
50
100
10 160
170
210
555
Cost saving
Substitutes for kerbs, stormwater pipework, kerb inlets and parts of
footways. Contractual claims due to damaged services etc., are less
likely than when laying conventional drainage.
35
245
170
TABLE 1
C.S. Area
A (m2)
Wetted
Perimeter P(m)
Hydraulic
A (m)
Radius R=
P
P
R
0.087
0.928
0.094
9.86
Base
0.047
0.569
0.083
6.84
75
50
R50
80
125
Advantages
Time saving (design and construction)
No long drainage sections required in the contract documents when
Beany Blocks are used.
380
35
Uses
Any application where high inlet capacity is required;
Beany produces 400mm length of inlet opening for every 1m of kerb;
Wide carriageways;
Parking areas;
Taxi ranks and bus depots;
Wash bays and vehicle service areas;
Median islands;
Industrial areas;
Drainage around buildings and walkways
Tollplazas.
The system consists of a series of Base Blocks of standard channel section and Top
Hydraulic constraints are shown in TABLE 1. Examples of velocities and capacities for the two flow
conditions with roughness value (k) = 0.6mm are shown in TABLE 2.
250
290
450
80
TABLE 2
Solving specific problems in conventional
drainage:
Insufficient fall;
Conflicting levels of service mains and cables;
Ponding adjacent to low points;
Traffic safety and control on existing
carriageways.
Additional cost savings can be achieved on
schemes involving:
Wide carriageways plus footways;
Carriageways having flat longitudinal falls;
Rock in sub-grade;
Shallow outfall;
Existing services or foul drainage at conflicting
levels.
2) Base only
1 in.
Vel. (m/s)
10
15
20
30
50
75
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
10.00
6.67
5.00
3.33
2.00
1.33
1.00
0.67
0.50
0.40
0.33
0.29
0.25
0.22
0.20
5.77
4.71
4.07
3.32
2.57
2.10
1.81
1.48
1.28
1.14
1.04
0.96
0.90
0.85
0.80
Cap. (l/s)
503
411
355
290
224
183
158
129
112
100
91
84
79
74
70
Vel. (m/s)
5.34
4.35
3.77
3.07
2.38
1.94
1.68
1.37
1.18
1.06
0.96
0.89
0.83
0.78
0.74
Cap. (l/s)
252
206
178
145
112
92
79
65
56
50
46
42
39
37
35